Hi
Is it a commit/push error? Discussion didnt outcome to that if I got it
right. Discussion led to put it outside tomee.git at least then preference
was more about to concentrate a single effort under Geronimo umbrella for
tomee and asf benefit.
How did we end up here? Did I miss a discussion?
Added project stubs:
https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/microprofile
Andy.
On 05/02/18 11:17, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote:
Hi,
Ok thanks guys.
@Rudy, you are most welcome :)
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:3
And what's that for?
Is there any behind the scene stuff going on at Tomitribe or can we finally get
back to discussing such things on the Apache lists?
Before we go on I'd would first finish the discussion how we want to turn TomEE
into an umbrella project or how the structure would be. And whet
Well the last discussion was about finding a way to unify the efforts.I totally
don't care whether this will be over at Geronimo or at TomEE.
If it is at TomEE, then this effort clearly has to be done in a way which
doesn't confuse users.Which means it must be totally clear which parts are
reus
"Parts of the components skeletons you just created"
They're just logically named empty modules for pending work?
On 12/02/18 20:42, Mark Struberg wrote:
And what's that for?
Is there any behind the scene stuff going on at Tomitribe or can we
finally get back to discussing such things on the
No Andy, as mentionned in the discussion Geronimo hosts the microprofile
@asf. This is why jwt should probably be done in geronimo which is the asf
ee related project umbrella.
I understand it is not the most convenient for tomitribe which probably
perfers to own the full project(s) but as a found
There is no implementation here at all, it is just the current spec
modules to start writing tests. I wanted to start writing a test for
geronimo config without interfering with anything else. No worries. I'll
revert it and start a private branch.
On 12/02/18 20:45, Mark Struberg wrote:
Well
You can PR it @geronimo if it is to add test coverage or to contribute
samples. We are on github normally.
Let me know if you need some help/pointers.
Le 12 févr. 2018 21:21, "Andy Gumbrecht" a
écrit :
> There is no implementation here at all, it is just the current spec
> modules to start writ
Reverted.
On 12/02/18 21:14, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
"Parts of the components skeletons you just created"
They're just logically named empty modules for pending work?
On 12/02/18 20:42, Mark Struberg wrote:
And what's that for?
Is there any behind the scene stuff going on at Tomitribe or ca
Any issues let me know and I'll fix tomorrow - not staying up for the
buildbot.
On 12/02/18 21:14, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
"Parts of the components skeletons you just created"
They're just logically named empty modules for pending work?
On 12/02/18 20:42, Mark Struberg wrote:
And what's tha
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> No Andy, as mentionned in the discussion Geronimo hosts the microprofile
> @asf. This is why jwt should probably be done in geronimo which is the asf
> ee related project umbrella.
>
I don't recall that discussion. Where did it take pl
Well, let's be a bit more specific.
a.)
No, Geronimo of course does not have have a monopoly on creating microprofile
implementations at the ASF. Nor does TomEE.
Geronimo a good place for reusable JavaEE parts though. And G started to
implement Microprofile specifications 2 years ago already. The
Oki, that was totally not obvious - sorry for getting this wrong ;)
Well but my other points are still valid: how do we like to continue with that
stuff?With sheldon, etc getting donated we HAVE to solve those issues.Except if
we say that those parts will become heavily TomEE centric and would
I'll apologize for not doing more on TomEE 8. But that is simply a time
thing, and not a Tomitribe thing. I still owe a fixed build on master
(which I am working on tonight) and forward porting the latest master
patches to the EE8 branch. That work is not forgotten, just has to be
fitted in with ev
I find the discussions and working on TomEE have become tedious,
contentious, unrewarding and fruitless in order to continue working on
the project in my free time. That'd be why I've not contributed
recently, but not speaking for others of course. I wasn't actually
trying to start any implemen
No worries Mark - I'll just work off the grid for now.
On 12/02/18 21:52, Mark Struberg wrote:
Oki, that was totally not obvious - sorry for getting this wrong ;)
Well but my other points are still valid: how do we like to continue with that
stuff?With sheldon, etc getting donated we HAVE to
It seems we all got hit on the wrong foot in some ways.
Why not take the chance to learn something and make it better.
For me: I should have asked what this is about instead of assuming something
which looked clear from my pov. Seems I was wrong.
@Andy what about creating a ticket on the issue tr
> On Feb 12, 2018, at 1:45 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> It seems we all got hit on the wrong foot in some ways.
> Why not take the chance to learn something and make it better.
> For me: I should have asked what this is about instead of assuming something
> which looked clear from my pov. Seems
Ok, community, we have to have another quick talk and then hopefully we can go
back to being awesome.
This thread got very negative and bares a striking resemblance to the
"Suffocating Development Environment" thread from the June 27th incident. Yes,
I've written about it enough times in the b
Mark you'd like us to talk about making TomEE an umbrella or not. I think it's
probably best you frame up and lead the discussion as you're the most
passionate about it and I won't do it justice.
I'd like to suggest that we give it two weeks. If the conversation dies out,
we need to read it a
All,
I followed what David calls "incidents" or "childish" quite closely in the
past. Why? Cause such situations are quite familiar to me. I've been there
thousands of times and what I can tell for granted is that non of these
situations are neither "incidents" nor "childish".
As a matter of fact
+1 words - and especially brief once as emails - are just a mapping from the
reality to some 'transport mechanism' (Claude Shannon sender theoreme anyone?).
And of course each 'map' is a huge simplification from the reality and thus
prone to be misinterpreted.
The important part here is that th
Instead of shooting to someone or start arguing. Simply asking would take
all misunderstand off and avoid this disgusting mess.
Le 13 févr. 2018 08:33, "Mark Struberg" a
écrit :
> +1 words - and especially brief once as emails - are just a mapping from
> the reality to some 'transport mechanism
23 matches
Mail list logo