On Sunday, 5 October 2014 at 21:53:08 UTC, eles wrote:
On Sunday, 5 October 2014 at 21:13:01 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 11:25:59 UTC, eles wrote:
it) and a new-comer on the scene is Tranglu, that I just
*Tanglu
http://www.tanglu.org/en/
On 10/2/14 3:42 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 07:14:35 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Doesn't Linux Mint provide an upgrade facility for you?
No idea.
I use Linux Mint, I believe I upgraded once *. I don't think it was
complex, just an upgrade
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 15:06:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/2/14 3:42 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 07:14:35 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Doesn't Linux Mint provide an upgrade facility for you?
No idea.
I use Linux Mint, I believe
On 10/6/14 12:10 PM, Kiith-Sa wrote:
On Monday, 6 October 2014 at 15:06:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 10/2/14 3:42 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 07:14:35 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Doesn't Linux Mint provide an upgrade facility for you?
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 11:12:12 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 07:43:54 UTC, eles wrote:
update-manager -d
It works.
Does it perform package upgrade? The comments are rather scary:
---
Hi, I have installed Linux mint 15 with Mint4Win as Dual boot
with Windows 7.
On 10/01/2014 04:50 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 10/01/2014 01:38 PM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
One nice thing about Ubuntu is that they even give you access to
future kernel versions through what they call HWE. In short, I can
run a 14.04 LTS kernel on a 12.04 server,
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 11:25:59 UTC, eles wrote:
Debian and Debian-based asks you to confirm file overwrite
(usually, the diff is displayed too).
Isn't it the same package manager? It should be able to do the
same on mint. Or may be fstab can be copied somewhere and then
back at some
On Sunday, 5 October 2014 at 21:13:01 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 11:25:59 UTC, eles wrote:
Debian and Debian-based asks you to confirm file overwrite
(usually, the diff is displayed too).
Isn't it the same package manager? It should be able to do the
same on mint. Or
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 12:44:08 UTC, eles wrote:
I doubt. At least, not easily. However, installing LMDE should
be a one-time process (it's a rolling distribution).
Do rolling distributions guarantee to not overwrite fstab? How
mint package update differs from a rolling distro package
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 07:16:14 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 12:44:08 UTC, eles wrote:
I doubt. At least, not easily. However, installing LMDE should
be a one-time process (it's a rolling distribution).
Do rolling distributions guarantee to not overwrite fstab? How
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 07:16:14 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 12:44:08 UTC, eles wrote:
I doubt. At least, not easily. However, installing LMDE should
be a one-time process (it's a rolling distribution).
Do rolling distributions guarantee to not overwrite fstab? How
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 11:31:07 UTC, eles wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 07:16:14 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 12:44:08 UTC, eles wrote:
I doubt. At least, not easily. However, installing LMDE
should be a one-time process (it's a rolling distribution).
Do
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 11:31:07 UTC, eles wrote:
The former attempt stability (because all packages are tested
together, along with their interactions), while the latter
attempt cutting-edge software (you update software as it gets
produced).
This generally true but not entirely true.
On 10/3/2014 3:25 AM, David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 07:16:14 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 12:44:08 UTC, eles wrote:
I doubt. At least, not easily. However, installing LMDE should be a
one-time process (it's a rolling
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 17:20:11 UTC, Brad Roberts via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 10/3/2014 3:25 AM, David Nadlinger via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 07:16:14 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 12:44:08 UTC, eles wrote:
My oldest
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 20:03:11 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
This a very unpleasant experience you get compared to sticking
to LTS or up to date distro
Erm, upgrading to the latest version is exactly what I want, old
version is of no interest to me. I read, one can reorient
aptitude to
On 2 October 2014 08:00, Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 20:03:11 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
This a very unpleasant experience you get compared to sticking to LTS or
up to date distro
Erm, upgrading to the latest
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 11:12:12 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 07:43:54 UTC, eles wrote:
update-manager -d
It works.
Does it perform package upgrade? The comments are rather scary:
---
Hi, I have installed Linux mint 15 with Mint4Win as Dual boot
with Windows 7.
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 11:40:31 UTC, eles wrote:
You simply made the wrong choice in the beginning.
Well, it looked popular and easy. Can I upgrade my mint to lmde?
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 12:06:16 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 11:40:31 UTC, eles wrote:
Well, it looked popular and easy.
Sorry. It's just that everything that glitters...
Can I upgrade my mint to lmde?
I doubt. At least, not easily. However, installing LMDE
On 1 October 2014 06:09, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Don't mean to be alarmist, but I'm posting this in case anyone else is like
me and hasn't been paying attention since this news broke (AIUI) about a
week ago.
Apparently bash has
On 10/1/14 1:09 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Patches have been issued (and likely more to come from what I gather), so:
FWIW, MacOS X now has an update for bash that fixes the bug, apparently
came out last night.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6495
-Steve
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 05:09:45 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Other OSes/distros are likely equally easy. Please, reply with
examples to help ensure other people on the same OS/distro as
you have no excuse not to update!
I find it ironic that it's another big global security hole
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 13:41:43 UTC, JN wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 05:09:45 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I find it ironic that it's another big global security hole
about which Windows users don't even have to be concerned about.
That's of course very true, since Windows
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 13:58:25 UTC, eles wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 13:41:43 UTC, JN wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 05:09:45 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I find it ironic that it's another big global security hole
about which Windows users don't even have to be
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 14:29:16 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
You would be surprised how some Fortune 500 companies are doing
their serious work in 100% Windows servers.
Sadly I need to comply with NDAs.
Isn't NASDAQ enough?
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 05:09:45 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Apparently bash has it's own heartbleed now, dubbed
shellshock.
Does it affect dash?
Also, how does one update software on linux? Last I checked, when
new version is out, repository of the previous version becomes
utterly
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 14:44:06 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Also, how does one update software on linux? Last I checked,
when new version is out, repository of the previous version
becomes utterly abandoned. A pity, on windows one can roll new
software versions as long as they are maintained.
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 14:44:06 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 05:09:45 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Does it affect dash?
No. It is a bashism, ie an extension specific to Bash. Busybox
users are not concerned neither.
A pity, on windows one can roll new
On 10/1/14 12:57 PM, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 15:48:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
This claim is so strange I can't even understand what it is about.
Which repositories get abandoned?
Repositories of the not latest version of the OS. Because only latest
version receives
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 16:57:07 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 15:45:26 UTC, eles wrote:
Repositories of the not latest version of the OS. Because only
latest version receives development. That is, if the OS doesn't
have rolling updates.
What is the difference
On 1 October 2014 18:12, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
On 10/1/14 12:57 PM, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 15:48:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
This claim is so strange I can't even understand what it is about.
Which
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 16:57:07 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 15:45:26 UTC, eles wrote:
The first thing that I love in Linux is the centralized update.
The downside is it's taken down centrally too, while
distributed windows software continues to work
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 18:42:41 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
A have linux mint 12 installation with mint4win (wubi), on
linux mint forums I was told, that updating from the latest
repository won't work. I would be grateful, if you explain, how
to upgrade it to the latest version. Yeah,
On 10/01/2014 03:19 PM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 10/1/2014 6:41 AM, JN via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 05:09:45 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Other OSes/distros are likely equally easy. Please, reply with
examples to help ensure other
On 10/01/2014 02:42 PM, Kagamin wrote:
A have linux mint 12 installation with mint4win (wubi), on linux mint
forums I was told, that updating from the latest repository won't work.
I sympathize:
On 10/01/2014 01:38 PM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
One nice thing about Ubuntu is that they even give you access to
future kernel versions through what they call HWE. In short, I can
run a 14.04 LTS kernel on a 12.04 server, so that I'm able to use
modern hardware and take
On Wednesday, 1 October 2014 at 20:45:14 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I suspect Mint may need to do things that way just as a
manpower issue. Mint's a popular distro, but I get the
impression it's development is a relatively small grassroots
thing with much more limited resources than say
Don't mean to be alarmist, but I'm posting this in case anyone else is
like me and hasn't been paying attention since this news broke (AIUI)
about a week ago.
Apparently bash has it's own heartbleed now, dubbed shellshock. Warm
fuzzy flashbacks of TMNT: The Arcade Game aside, this appears to
On 10/01/2014 01:09 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Debian 6: (Including setting up the LTS repos):
$ sudo cat 'deb http://http.debian.net/debian squeeze-lts main contrib
non-free' /etc/apt/sources.list
$ sudo cat 'deb-src http://http.debian.net/debian squeeze-lts main
contrib non-free'
40 matches
Mail list logo
