On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
focusing on three things: safety, lifetime management, and
static introspection.
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 04:02:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 21:57:37 Andrew Browne via
Digitalmars-d- announce wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu
wrote:
> We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main
>
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 12:53:16 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 05:33:07 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
On that topic, D's arrays would play nicer with both
refcounting *and* modern garbage collectors if they were
structured as base, offset, length instead of start,
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 05:33:07 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
On that topic, D's arrays would play nicer with both
refcounting *and* modern garbage collectors if they were
structured as base, offset, length instead of start, length.
That might be slower sometimes as slices wouldn't fit in
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 05:33:07 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:02:38 -0800, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I don't see how it possibly could given how dynamic arrays
work in D. It would have to have some sort of reference
counting mechanism, which
On Friday, January 13, 2017 05:33:07 Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:02:38 -0800, Jonathan M Davis via
>
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > I don't see how it possibly could given how dynamic arrays work in D. It
> > would have to have some sort of
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:02:38 -0800, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> I don't see how it possibly could given how dynamic arrays work in D. It
> would have to have some sort of reference counting mechanism, which
> would likely be a nightmare with slicing
On that topic, D's
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 21:57:37 Andrew Browne via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
>
> wrote:
> > We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
> > we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
focusing on three things: safety, lifetime management, and
static introspection.
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 15:58:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 01/04/2017 08:06 PM, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
C++ integration has disappeared? Is this now "done"?
We have a student on that. I've added a line for that to the
doc. -- Andrei
I did a lot of work on C++ name mangling
On Thursday, 12 January 2017 at 09:54:08 UTC, Mark wrote:
I think the "D for C++ programmers" page could use a revamp:
https://dlang.org/cpptod.html
At the moment it mainly explains where and how D differs from
C++. Whoever reads it may be ready to write C++ code in D, but
this seems
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 00:15:23 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 23:33:45 UTC, Benjiro wrote:
Maybe something to add ( for new users ) is something similar
to:
http://rustbyexample.com/
Easy to use, lots of information, simple tasks that involve
interaction for the user,
- tagging instead of hierarchical categories
The categories are in fact just a form of hierarchical tags. This is
quite useful, because applying a tag will bring in the ancestor tags for
free. The UI for both, applying tags and filtering, could be better,
though. And some form of crowd
On Sunday, January 08, 2017 18:06:53 Brian via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
>
> wrote:
> > We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
> > we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
> >
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
focusing on three things: safety, lifetime management, and
static introspection.
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 19:55:30 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 01/05/2017 11:00 AM, Basile B. wrote:
I don't known what did you decide in intern but when the
discussion
between users was hot (just after version 2.071.1 I think)
I've proposed
that:
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 15:58:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 01/04/2017 08:06 PM, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
C++ integration has disappeared? Is this now "done"?
We have a student on that. I've added a line for that to the
doc. -- Andrei
Cool. C++ integration would be a big
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 23:33:45 UTC, Benjiro wrote:
Maybe something to add ( for new users ) is something similar
to:
http://rustbyexample.com/
Easy to use, lots of information, simple tasks that involve
interaction for the user, feedback on success.
Do you know about the existing
On Saturday, 7 January 2017 at 20:10:17 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
I think there won't be much discussions about the goals (maybe
about the priorities). Many people come up with the same ideas
to resolve the pain points.
Actually I have a draft for a renewed site, will look at
implementing
On 01/07/2017 02:55 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 01/05/2017 11:00 AM, Basile B. wrote:
I don't known what did you decide in intern but when the discussion
between users was hot (just after version 2.071.1 I think) I've proposed
that:
On 01/05/2017 11:45 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Am 05.01.2017 um 01:59 schrieb Paul O'Neil:
>> On 01/04/2017 02:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals we plan to
>>> pursue in the coming six months. This half we are focusing on three
>>>
On 01/06/2017 11:09 PM, Anton wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals we plan
>> to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are focusing on three
>> things: safety, lifetime management,
On 01/05/2017 11:00 AM, Basile B. wrote:
> I don't known what did you decide in intern but when the discussion
> between users was hot (just after version 2.071.1 I think) I've proposed
> that:
> https://github.com/BBasile/DIPs/blob/3d5e3f81c541c6e23c69555a230b4d42a7bb6de6/DIPs/DIP8484.md
This is
On 01/05/2017 05:43 AM, Basile B. wrote:
> To simplify introspection with library traits that use the compiler
> "__traits()" someone has to remove the restrictions related to
> protection attributes. This is not a new topic. Without this, the new
> library traits won't work well and people won't
On 01/04/2017 11:43 PM, Basile B. wrote:
To simplify introspection with library traits that use the compiler
"__traits()" someone has to remove the restrictions related to
protection attributes. This is not a new topic. Without this, the new
library traits won't work well and people won't use
On 01/04/2017 08:06 PM, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote:
C++ integration has disappeared? Is this now "done"?
We have a student on that. I've added a line for that to the doc. -- Andrei
P/S
strange search one of cases why registry has a lot of similar
projects
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
focusing on three things: safety, lifetime management, and
static introspection.
Am 05.01.2017 um 01:59 schrieb Paul O'Neil:
On 01/04/2017 02:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals we plan to
pursue in the coming six months. This half we are focusing on three
things: safety, lifetime management, and static
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 21:07:00 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 08:45:09PM +, Stefan Koch via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...]
I claim dips on templates. (as in the colloquial english for
asserting
rights/ownership )
[...]
FYI, it's spelt "dibs" (with a 'b').
On Thursday, 5 January 2017 at 09:49:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, January 05, 2017 04:43:12 Basile B. via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu
wrote:
> We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main
> goals
On Thursday, January 05, 2017 04:43:12 Basile B. via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
>
> wrote:
> > We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
> > we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
> >
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
focusing on three things: safety, lifetime management, and
static introspection.
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
focusing on three things: safety, lifetime management, and
static introspection.
On Thursday, 5 January 2017 at 02:32:00 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
Templatize dmd <-> druntime API
I'm curious as to why. I'm guessing this is for things like
creating runtime type information?
This thread
(http://forum.dlang.org/post/mr7a65$2hc$1...@digitalmars.com) should
provide some
On 05/01/2017 8:22 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals we plan to
pursue in the coming six months. This half we are focusing on three
things: safety, lifetime management, and static introspection.
https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2017H1
On Thursday, 5 January 2017 at 02:32:00 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
I'm curious as to why. I'm guessing this is for things like
creating runtime type information?
There's a lot of benefits to it: it'd simplify the compiler a
bit, it'd simplify making custom runtimes, and it'd give us
options to
> Templatize dmd <-> druntime API
I'm curious as to why. I'm guessing this is for things like creating
runtime type information?
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
focusing on three things: safety, lifetime management, and
static introspection.
On 01/04/2017 02:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals we plan to
pursue in the coming six months. This half we are focusing on three
things: safety, lifetime management, and static introspection.
https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2017H1
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 21:21:17 UTC, aberba wrote:
I like the social media part. More people, more man power, more
noise about D.
I would read it as, with better signal-to-noise ratio.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 08:45:09PM +, Stefan Koch via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> I claim dips on templates. (as in the colloquial english for asserting
> rights/ownership )
[...]
FYI, it's spelt "dibs" (with a 'b'). ;-)
T
--
It won't be covered in the book. The source code has
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
focusing on three things: safety, lifetime management, and
static introspection.
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 at 19:22:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We release a brief Vision document summarizing the main goals
we plan to pursue in the coming six months. This half we are
focusing on three things: safety, lifetime management, and
static introspection.
44 matches
Mail list logo
