On 09/06/2015 06:33, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
snip
* Consolidated D1 D2 issues under D2.
It appears that you've changed everything to D2 indiscriminately, including issues that
have nothing to do with the D language or compiler, let alone D2 (e.g. issues with the
Bugzilla installation,
On 24/04/2015 11:58, Kagamin wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 April 2015 at 21:31:39 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
How does using SVN lead to fragmentation? I don't understand.
See
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.3160.1418550079.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
?? I've had a quick look, and can't
On 22/04/2015 08:20, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
snip
If you're forking a project on Github you get your own copy of the project. The
projects
are linked but the repositories are not. What I mean by that is on your fork
you'll see
that it is a fork with a link back to the original project. From the
On 21/04/2015 00:35, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
snip
In the other thread I referred to this
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5010754/github-collaborators-have-commit-access
which makes it sound as though it's possible to do the same thing in GitHub.
Is that
page wrong?
This question
On 21/04/2015 00:42, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
snip
Committing is a local (non-network) operation in git, so you must have pushed
them
afterwards, or your GUI has done this for you.
I committed using TortoiseSVN. Would that auto-push? I never imagined so.
snip
The shared repository model
On 20/04/2015 00:37, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sunday, 19 April 2015 at 23:14:13 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
For those of you who are still unfamiliar with GitHub,
Stewart, I haven't seen an active D project that WASN'T hosted on GitHub for
years now.
That doesn't mean absolutely none
On 20/04/2015 00:25, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
snip
Even if he had, what would be the point? It would greatly slow down the whole
process.
We have SVN repositories so that people can just put their updates straight in,
Only those who have access can do that. Getting patches into the bindings
On 21/04/2015 00:19, Stewart Gordon wrote:
snip
?? When I worked on the project on dsource, until it stopped working recently I
generally
had no trouble just committing my updates using SVN. I didn't have to create
patches at
all. As I understood it, neither did anybody else who helped out
In the light of problems with SVN on dsource, the Bindings project has been migrated to
GitHub on a trial basis. Apparently this is more or less the last active project on
Dsource, so after a brief discussion on another thread I have decided to give it a try.
So it's now at:
The wiki is terribly broken at the moment. I just edited a page
http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings/wiki/WikiStart
and it changed every linebreak to the literal string `\r\n`. The page looks OK in
preview, but then it breaks when you actually save it.
Stewart.
--
My email address is
On 16/04/2015 03:35, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 16/04/2015 11:25 a.m., Stewart Gordon wrote:
snip
How would we go about committing updates to it when this is done?
Let's say there is a new function in gdi.h added.
You would look for the file:
core/sys/windows/windows/gdi.d
And add
I haven't been active on the newsgroups lately, so lose track of what's going on. Has
anything happened?
Just now I tried to commit to the bindings project on dsource, but got an error
POST request on '/projects/bindings/!svn/me' failed: 500 Internal Server Error
Has it been doing this for a
On 07/04/2015 19:34, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 16:33:37 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
I haven't been active on the newsgroups lately, so lose track of what's going
on. Has
anything happened?
Just now I tried to commit to the bindings project on dsource, but got
On 07/04/2015 22:44, Stewart Gordon wrote:
snip
So I guess I'll have to try committing just a few at a time and see if that
works.
snip
Oh dear, it seems even that doesn't. It isn't predictable at what point it will fail, but
every single time it's failing somewhere. Even if I try
On 18/06/2012 00:49, cal wrote:
snip
ubyte[] data = some data;
Image img = new Img!(Px.R8G8B8)(width, height, data);
Image? Img?
img.write(mypng.png);
It uses adaptive filtering, and should work with the pixel formats supported by
the image
class (except for the 16 bit ones I've just
On 17/06/2012 08:55, cal wrote:
snip
If you don't care too much about compression level, you simply zlib
compress the data, write it out by image row/scanline, include
appropriate header and chunk info, and you're done.
snip
Not quite. You need to encode it by scanline, add the filter byte
On 17/06/2012 14:38, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
FWIW a while ago I wrote a simple experimental program that generates an
image and encodes it as a PNG. And I've just tweaked it and updated it to
D2 (attached). It supports
As some of you have heard already, I've taken the plunge and switched to D2.
And, having seemingly discovered that most people have already left D1 behind, and that
it's now harder than it was to make code compatible with both languages, I have decided to
make my libraries D2-only.
Other
On 01/04/2012 18:27, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
snip
I gave this a brief look, the console stuff for windows caught my eye.
No offense, but I totally expected console module to do coloring or some other
cool
terminal stuff. As is it looks like a workaround for stdio.
I'm not sure what it would
On 01/04/2012 18:27, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
snip
No offense, but I totally expected console module to do coloring or some other
cool
terminal stuff. As is it looks like a workaround for stdio.
snip
I've now rephrased the description of console on the library's main page to make its
purpose
With arrays and pointers, you can declare
const(int[]) constData;
immutable(int[]) immutableData;
to enforce constancy constraints. The type modifiers apply both to the reference to the
data and to the data being referenced. If you want to be able to change what data the
variables
I'm not sure how my post ended up in .announce, but anyway
On 28/03/2012 15:24, bearophile wrote:
snip
Is it possible to invent a language construct that allows:
const(Rebindable!(const()))
To be defined as the same as:
Rebindable!(const())
You mean be defined the same as
On 28/03/2012 16:09, Stewart Gordon wrote:
snip
Something like an onConst()/onImmutable templated methods for structs/classes?
snip
I'm not sure whether this would be a good idea. And it would solve only one of
Rebindable's many shortcomings
Moreover, any feature that makes a type
On 21/02/2012 00:53, James Miller wrote:
snip
There are a potentially infinite number of possible configurations,
and sites need to be aimed at the lowest-common denominator. Doesn't
look right with an enlarged font size? Tough.
snip
Try saying that in court when you're sued for disability
On 21/02/2012 11:43, James Miller wrote:
snip
Its more, if you are using a font with a massive difference in size,
then obviously things aren't going to look right. However, if a
website require pixel-perfect rendering, then it isn't going to work
anyway once it hits a platform that isn't the
On 19/02/2012 20:46, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
snip
The forum starts looking bad for me when I make the browser window smaller than
730 pixels
in width. Sorry, but I don't think anyone designs web pages for resolutions
lower than
800x600 today.
Mobile devices still have screens much smaller
On 19/02/2012 14:22, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2012 at 13:22:43 UTC, bearophile wrote:
A screen grab:
http://oi39.tinypic.com/2s7e1dy.jpg
I'm not quite sure what browser or configuration you're using, but the
screenshot does not
represent the intended look of the
On 17/12/2011 21:06, Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2011-12-17 13:09:35 +, Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com said:
snip
No, because in order to determine whether it's well-formed, one must know
whether it's
meant to be in SGML-based HTML, HTML5 or XHTML.
Perhaps for it matters for validation
On 17/12/2011 18:09, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Stewart Gordonsmjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:jci2bj$225s$1...@digitalmars.com...
snip
em isn't really an old-school example. It's the proper semantic markup
for emphasis.
Ok. It was a dedicated HTML tag instead of a span/div with
On 17/12/2011 06:35, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
snip
But if it'sijust/i ordinary text that simply needs to bebbolded/b
oriitalicized/i, then handling it in any roundabout way like that is
justiridiculous/i (and self-documenting would be completely
inapplicable).
You miss the point - why would
On 14/12/2011 10:12, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/12/11 7:46 PM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 06/12/2011 05:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://d-p-l.org
Andrei
Why does it have an HTML 4.01 doctype but then go on to use XHTML syntax???
Stewart.
I wouldn't know. What needs to be done
On 16/12/2011 18:26, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
snip
For example, I have an articles section on my site that (currently) uses
TangoCMS. I neither know nor care what doctype TangoCMS is sending out (and
I have even less interest in mucking with it's internals to change it), and
yet when I want to
On 16/12/2011 15:09, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 16 December 2011 at 13:33:06 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
But whatever I try to validate it as, there are errors.
Does validation make any positive difference at all?
Yes:
- it's a useful step in diagnosing problems with a webpage
On 06/12/2011 05:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://d-p-l.org
Andrei
Why does it have an HTML 4.01 doctype but then go on to use XHTML syntax???
Stewart.
On 26/10/2011 19:34, Walter Bright wrote:
snip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
snip
Version D 2.056 Sep 10, 2011
New/Changed Features
Druntime Bugs Fixed
Library Bugs Fixed
DMD Bugs Fixed
???
Stewart.
On 26/10/2011 02:44, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
snip
I have not looked over them in detail, but from what I've seen, they're _very_
similar - as in they took the C format specifiers and followed them in almost
all (and maybe even all) cases but added a few of their own. But slight
differences
On 13/10/2011 20:09, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
snip
I've written something to format and parse SysTimes using format strings based
on the
format PHP uses for its date() function:
https://github.com/CyberShadow/ae/blob/master/utils/time.d
Feel free to use this file as public domain.
My
On 13/10/2011 05:22, Jesse Phillips wrote:
Thought I would let everyone know that while std.dateparse is deprecated
and will be removed from Phobos in February, I've updated it to output a
std.datetime.SysTime.
https://gist.github.com/1283011
I don't have any interest in maintaining it, but
On 25/10/2011 20:53, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
snip
What does Walter have to do with anything here?
It was always my understanding that Walter is the man in charge of D
development.
He's not implementing any
date/time stuff, and he's not all that involved with Phobos development in
general.
On 25/10/2011 22:22, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
snip
At minimum, as I understand it, C, Java, python, and Ruby all have similar
date/time formatting facilities and use mostly the same flags for date/time
formatting.
If they're only _similar_, it isn't really a standard. Indeed, it seems to me a
On 12/03/2010 04:40, Walter Bright wrote:
Both C++ and D versions:
http://bugzilla.digitalmars.com/issues/
Why the two Bugzillas?
Stewart.
On 05/10/2010 06:51, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
snip
I think this site has good CSS tutorials: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/
Here is a tutorial for a liquid three column layout with a header and a
footer: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/floatutorial/tutorial0916.htm
That's geared towards creating a
On 04/10/2010 00:09, Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com
Yes, I should add some color and style sheets, but at the moment I am
just trying to get the layout right and make it much simpler to get to
what I think are the most useful links.
Comments welcome.
The layout breaks in
On 22/09/2010 22:26, Emil Madsen wrote:
Okay I'm interresting in getting more infomation about the bit[] type;
- is it still implemented in D1?
bit is now just an alias of bool, defined in object.
- and why was it removed?
I think because there were too many complaints of bugs with it, and
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:huj8co$od...@digitalmars.com...
Taken the words out of my mouth there. I once came across this:
http://www.wiltshirefarmfoods.com/accessibility.asp
Wiltshire Farm Foods has worked hard to make this site
Adam Ruppe wrote:
On 6/5/10, Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
snip
Others claim that some layouts just can't be made fluid.
The most annoying thing is the web is fluid by default - you have to
fight it to make it fixed width! But, meh, people are stupid.
Taken the words out of my
Adam Ruppe wrote:
On 6/4/10, Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
See also this discussion I was once involved in:
http://tinyurl.com/3ysen6d
and in particular Alan J. Flavell's comment (number 12 in the tree).
This thread reminds me of another bug report I got a few months ago:
please
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Matthias Pleh wrote:
I have renewed the layout of the wiki4d-site.
It's not finished, but I think it is already useable!
Content itself hasn't changed!
Any thoughts?
snip
Get rid of the abomination that is font sizes in px! Specify them in em
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
David Gileadi wrote:
snip
The bottom line for its recommendations is to use ems, plus
font-size:100% in the body tag.
Funny thing is: they got it wrong! The text of that page is too
small here...
Indeed, there are many web pages that don't practise what they
Adam Ruppe wrote:
Going OT here, but I've gotta defend the pixel font sizes.
I used to do percents, (since I read somewhere that px is evil and
zomfg never use it...) but I got tired of the constant bug reports
coming in from the clients saying it doesn't match the psd exactly on
my Mac.
Matthias Pleh wrote:
I have renewed the layout of the wiki4d-site.
It's not finished, but I think it is already useable!
Content itself hasn't changed!
Any thoughts?
snip
Get rid of the abomination that is font sizes in px! Specify them in em
or, even better, not at all.
Stewart.
Don wrote:
snip
IMHO, one of the most important bugs to fix is actually a spec bug:
4056 Template instantiation with bare parameter not documented
snip
Why single out that one?
This is the one that needs fixing most of all:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=677
Stewart.
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
snip
I'm using firefox. Even on their main
developer.apple.com/iphone/index.action, most of the text is light grey
on white.
Text is black here. But it is very thin, are you sure this isn't an
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:hspj3m$1c9...@digitalmars.com...
snip
Web sites should avoid setting specific font sizes, so low vision
users can enlarge it.
I agree a lot with most of this, but any web browser that doesn't
scale
Denis Koroskin wrote:
snip
int bar() @property
{
return 42;
}
What is @ going to be used for generally? (What is the essential
difference between an attribute that's an @word and one that's a simple
keyword before or after the type?)
Stewart.
Walter Bright wrote:
Stewart Gordon wrote:
I'm still none the wiser about why it absolutely has to be done like
this instead of the simpler solution I proposed years ago.
Can you refresh my memory?
Seems straightforward to find to me, but here it is:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives
Walter Bright wrote:
snip
There are some tricky bits to doing contract inheritance, I hope gdc and
ldc don't have trouble with it.
What tricky bits are those?
Stewart.
Walter Bright wrote:
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
snip
There are some tricky bits to doing contract inheritance, I hope gdc
and ldc don't have trouble with it.
What tricky bits are those?
It's outlined in the code comments, but it's implemented by making the
contract code
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:h8jg33$bb...@digitalmars.com...
Mostly additions to datetime: alignment fields for formatting, and a
unixTime property.
A few other tweaks and bug fixes have also been thrown in.
http://pr.stewartsplace.org.uk/d
Mostly additions to datetime: alignment fields for formatting, and a
unixTime property.
A few other tweaks and bug fixes have also been thrown in.
http://pr.stewartsplace.org.uk/d/sutil/
Stewart.
BCS wrote:
Reply to bearophile,
John C:
Did you not read the change log?
Implicit integral conversions that could result in loss of
significant bits are no longer allowed.
This was the code:
ubyte m = (n = 0 ? 0 : (n = 255 ? 255 : n));
That last n is guaranteed to fit inside an ubyte
snip
Walter Bright wrote:
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Walter, how often do you update your working copy from the SVN?
Obviously less than once every 2 releases.
As far as I know, it is current. Everything got checked in.
So how has the fix for
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2580
Walter, how often do you update your working copy from the SVN?
Obviously less than once every 2 releases.
Stewart.
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
snip
From the backend license:
The Software was not designed to operate after December 31, 1999.
Well that explains EVERYTHING! ;)
As does the preceding statement It has not undergone testing.
Hang on ... does that mean that 200% of things are now explained? Now
Implemented handling of file drag and drop. The MDI Edit example uses it.
And updated D2 support to DMD 2.023.
http://pr.stewartsplace.org.uk/d/sdwf/
Stewart.
Walter Bright wrote:
snip
Writing labeled block statements is something more likely to be
generated by an automated D code generator,
I still don't get it.
and it's convenient to be able to control if a scope is generated or not.
To force a block to create a scope:
{{
...
}}
To
I don't know how it's ended up being this long between successive SDWF
releases! Consider this an update to set the ball rolling again.
Now that the Windows API bindings on Dsource have developed, I figured it
was time that SDWF should use these bindings. So now it does. This might
also
67 matches
Mail list logo
