Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I am bumping the arsd repo dub's version number to 4.0.0. (this is super
super arbitrary for me though, I very rarely ACTUALLY break backward
compatibility, in fact I try to be both backward and forward compatible
with myself and with dmd versions, just meh)
yay, so your
Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 18:41:11 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
audio-formats is a new pure D #DUB package that allows to decode and
encode audio files.
Also: it's just a custom repackaging of the huge work of Ketmar.
https://repo.or.cz/iv.d.git
glad you found
Guillaume Piolat wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2020 at 18:49:23 UTC, ketmar wrote:
glad you found it useful! but why only that? there is GPL Opus decoder
too, and two decoders for Ogg/Vorbis: stb and complete port of the
official Xyph tremor library. also, you can find a resampler there,
ta
Guillaume Piolat wrote:
Any input concerning stb_vorbis vs Tremor? Tremor is twice the code size
and I'm not sure the one to be favoured.
tbh, i didn't really tested stb much (if at all). it *should* work, but...
my audio player was based on tremor, so it is better tested. maybe just
make `v
quick-and-dirty port of my Zymosis Z80 emulation engine to D.
code was built from scratch and not using huge tables to generate
huge sources (it's just one module with source size ~64KB).
it properly emulates all known Z80 quirks (including MEMPTR
register) and passes all 1335 tests from FUSE.
On Sunday, 20 April 2014 at 13:08:02 UTC, bearophile wrote:
sorry, it uses GDC @attribute("forceinline") feature, so you
Have you performed a benchmark with and without that attribute?
not on this code yet. will check it someday,
http://repo.or.cz/w/zymosis.d.git
In this kind of code compute
On Sunday, 20 April 2014 at 15:17:56 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
https://github.com/TurkeyMan/superemu
wow, my google-fu is bad than. %-) doing 'git clone' right now.
btw, what is the license for your code?
Funny you make a point of forceinline, I have forceinline
placeholders
btw, what is the license for your code?
I don't really care. Refer to it as much as you like.
so maybe you will add license to sources? WTFPL, for example,
which basically means "public domain". the thing is that sources
without license are proprietary, and nobody except the author can
do anyt
If something's open source with no commercial intent, is there
good
reason not to use gpl? How hard is it to change later?
i don't see a reason not to use GPL even on commercial code. %-)
this is quick-and-dirty port of TweetNaCl to D. it's not a proper
'D rewrite' of TweetNaCl, it still shows it's C roots, but it
works. and it has test suite and ddoc which original TweetNaCl
lacks.
WARNING! API is subject to change. but you can take the current
version and use it as-is if the
bug tracker is just a thing to collecting dust. you can write your
report there, or to /dev/null, or not write it at all -- the result
will be the same.
i know at least 3 bugs in phobos and at least one very nasty bug in
compiler (which causes UB, so-called heisenbug), but have no motivation
to re
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 06:39:56 +
uri via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> You spent the effort implementing a fix, the time talking about
> your fix but cannot be buggered submitting a PR for the fix?
one fix at a time, not more. the first one is still sitting in
bugtracker, collecting dust. ma
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:03:38 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> You mean http://issues.dlang.org? That's used regularly.
oh, really? https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12853
> Whatcha waiting for? reports + pull requests please. Thanks! -- Andrei
have no motivati
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:19:43 +
Dragos Carp via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Fix is in Bugzilla attached, though without an unittest
> demonstrating the error.
test is in bugzilla, but it's not formatted as unittest, just as
standalone module copypasted in comments. my fault, i'm really so
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:53:07 +0200
Lionello Lunesu via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> It's fine, I can create the PR for you
there is one already, but without tests:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2336
> You'll get the credit as well, of course.
i don't care about credits
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 01:11:00 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I have completed the translation of the book.
great news! and great book. thank you.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
preliminary, but working port of Cassowary Solver — GUI-oriented
constraint solver, toolkit-agnostic layout engine. it's not
D-spirited yet, but it works. todo list includes templated
classes and bindings for gtk.d. feel free to fork and improve.
url: http://repo.or.cz/w/cassowary.d.git
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:01:45 +
Yuriy via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> +1
> http://code.dlang.org/packages/cassowary-d
damn it! my google-fu sux again. i did search and found nothing, so
made a port. feel so stupid now...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 15:16:07 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
heh. but i have a nice text parser! so it's not a completely trashcan
work. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:36:37 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
wow.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:43:56 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
ah. sure i'll try to write you about every bug i found. %-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:39:15 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
can't link it. GNU/Linux, x86, latest DMD from git.
lib/libd.a(semantic.o): In function
`_D1d3ast10expression56__T15UnaryExpressionTC1d3ast10expression13AstExpressionZ15UnaryExpression11__T6__ctorZ6__ctorMFS1d8locat
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:07:56 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> hmm it looks like you are not linking llvm in ...
but i am. %-) or, better to say, your makefile doing it with
`llvm-config --libs`.
> do you use the most recent version from my sdc32-experimental
> repo ?
yes, j
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:33:05 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> please do `git pull` and if the error presists post the full
> error-message on dpaste or similar.
you're welcome.
upgated to git commit 58a36a1acdc6b9a5bcd07edf69b958c3b4ac1657
build log: http://dpaste.com/2NBTC
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:40:31 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Are you on a 64bit system ?
no, i said somewhere in the previous messages that i'm using x86 arch.
%-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:54:42 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> AFAICS this it because you are using dmd-master
> if it fails with the dmd-2.065 then I have a real nut to crack
sorry, you are right. downgrading to dmd-2.065 fixes the build.
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:33:39 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> please try to compile a few tests and tell me if it works
results of runner.d: http://dpaste.com/0P4DXGE
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 18:29:59 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
still, very impressive!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 21:58:58 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> enableing multihtreading and such
i explititely passes runner.d -j1 (other cores has work to do too %-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 22:16:50 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> sh buildTester.sh
alas, i have no LLVMArchive, and it refuses to link without it. when i
removed -L-lLLVMArchive, it says that
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-slackware-linux/4.9.1/../../../libLLVMSupport.a(Process.o):
In funct
On Sat, 2 Aug 2014 01:37:33 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
damn, it's hard to switch between two dmds. ok, i compiled everything,
here's the timings:
./runner 2> /dev/null > /dev/null 21.39s user 1.48s system 146% cpu 15.643
total
./jsonRunner 2> /dev/null
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 23:16:43 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Thanks for your cooperation!
you're welcome. %-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 02 Aug 2014 03:27:58 +
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I got that error recently. It is an LLVM bug and upgrading LLVM
> should do the trick.
in my case it was nothing with LLVM. sdc-32 needs dmd-2.065, and i'm
using dmd-2.066-master. switching to 2.065 resolves the iss
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 15:49:09 +
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> it must have a commit I have squashed.
> I do this quite often since sometimes I commit stuff that causes
> my build to fail :p
btw, please, don't do that. just revert commits, there's no need to
rewrite the histo
On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 23:12:43 +0200
Mike Wey via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> GtkD is a D binding and OO wrapper of Gtk+ and is released on the LGPL
> license.
>
> The most notable changes in this release are the discontinuation of
> the support for D1, and better support for installing more t
a small update for parser: it is now possible to parse so-called
"scripts" (only from 'string' type for now). sample script can
look like this one, which centers two buttons inside the panel,
keepeng equal button sizes:
===[cutline]===
var(stay)
panel.left = 0,
panel.top = 0,
panel.width
subj. C API wrapped in a nice struct (WARNING! ugly mixins
inside!). there is no extensive documentation (oh, c'mon, do you
really need it?), but repo contains sample tag viewer/editor.
requires taglib_c (C wrapper from the original taglib package).
repo: http://repo.or.cz/w/taglib.d.git
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 10:50:38 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I have just recompiled dmd, but I don't see that new compiler
> switch (dmd 2.067).
are you sure that you compiled dmd for 32-bit windows? other versions
seems to not have this flag.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 11:34:59 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Yes, I am using a 32 bit Windows.
are you sure that you have latest git then? yes, i know that this is
very silly question, but sometimes... ;-)
unfortunately, i have no windows boxes (neither cross-compilers), so
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 13:01:06 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> OK, -m32mscoff works (probably I was using a wrongly written
> switch), but I don't see it listed among the other compiler
> switches.
maybe this is due to mscoff support still considering 'experimental'?
signat
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:01:24 +
bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> What's the advantage of this over maintaing packages for the RC
> version until it's ready?
'cause not releasing periodically means "ah, it will never be ready!
let's look at another language, D is not worth using ye
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:48:00 +
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I don't see how infrequent, stable releases are more likely to
> provoke that reaction than frequent, unstable releases.
"stability" is something that cannot be achieved in living language.
and having offic
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 20:22:08 -0400
Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Well, people will invent *any* excuse to pass over anything they
> don't feel like bothering with. It sounds like that's probably what
> they were doing.
not exactly, 'cause they *are* interested in using D, es
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:24:54 +
Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
> publication it's on LOR?
DYI.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:24:54 +
Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Who could help with translation change logs to russian and
> publication it's on LOR?
sorry, i mean DIY. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 15:27:34 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I think it would be great to motivate the change properly. -- Andrei
aren't it motivated enough in PR? this will allow to build real package
hierarchies instead of dumping everything in one flat package.
my
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:41:29 +0900
Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
btw. http://wiki.dlang.org/Beta_Testing contains bug #10928 as
"blocker", but it's marked as "RESOLVED FIXED" in bugzilla. and bug
#12696 needs to be rechecked, as it seems to be fixed too.
signature.asc
Descrip
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 07:25:43 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
but it requires to dump all 'subpackages' into one flat directory and
with ugly names.
proposed extension will not break any existing code, yet will allow much
nicer hierarchy.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:19:37 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Can't it be addressed by publishing release schedule, like llvm
> does it, to indicate the work is going on?
hm. sounds reasonable. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:15:53 +
disapointed user via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> support for windows that really sucks.
that is 'cause windows really sucks.
> good luck in the future for all you guys
you too.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:26:36 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Huh? If std.datetime and std.regex are subpackages of `std`
> package, it usually means, they should reside in `std` directory,
> no? And how explicit package protection can change that?
imagine mybiglib, mybiglib.in
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:33:52 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Do we need a hierarchy of internals, is the problem this big? Why
> mybiglib.wisdom is not good?
ah, why we need such things as subdirectories at all? CP/M was fine
without concept of subdirectories!
signature.asc
D
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:18:09 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> What is it that we could help with? -- Andrei
he's drama queen, he doesn't need any help, only attention.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 22:00:57 +
eles via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I don't like Go (syntax, mainly). The sole contender in the
> C++-like family, for systems programming, would be Vala, but
> since they dropped the posix profile... :(
language without CTFE is soo unpleasant to use afte
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:19:59 -0700
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> No need to demean the question. It is valid. -- Andrei
sorry, i don't mean to insult anyone, just trying to make people see
analogies. hierarchies are everywhere, it's convient way to store alot
of things.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 22:02:31 +
anonymous via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> From a German author that would be an embracement of fascism.
i always wonder how good people at finding various offences and fascims
everywhere.
i bet that such people are glad to censor Hašek's "The Good Soldier
Š
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:57:27 +0200
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Specially the younger generations, they just use it because it sounds
> cool.
and fun. they don't fear that old dead dog anymore, they making fun of
it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 04:31:31 -0400
Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Yea, this *statement* really made me go o_O
>
> link[$.rel = "foobar", $.type = "text/css"];
>
> That's a lot of syntax abuse there!
but it's fun! we all used to think that "$ should mean 'length'" and he
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:37:30 +
Ola Fosheim Gr via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Now the comma-operator has to stay because removing it is a
> severe breaking change.
but we can abuse opIndex and/or opSlice too! ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:48:32 +
anonymous via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> It's pretty much the Nazi anthem.
oh, really? let's see. current German anthem:
Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit
für das deutsche Vaterland!
Danach lasst uns alle streben
brüderlich mit Herz und Hand!
and so on. pr
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:08:05 +
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Please, this is not important enough to argue here.
ah, excuse me. it's so easy to drag me into such talks... mea culpa.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 20:48:22 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
or (smart plan!) just apply the necessary PRs, build dmd from sources
and start using the features. if authors of popular libraries will do
this, there will be no choice and maintainers will be forced to apply
this pa
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 04:50:36 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
to be honest, i myself is a happy user of Kenji's $ patch and
package(...) patch. yes, it costs some efforts to keep 'em up-to-date,
but hey, i have no life anyway.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 02:39:39 +
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> It is the same reasoning as with deep filesystem hierarchies and,
> well, any data hierarchies
i already told that, but without any effects.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:51:10 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> 5. Using C's floor instead of D's floor. - very significant (why?)
gcc/clang inlines floorf().
gdc generates calls to floor() in both cases, C floor() is just faster.
i.e. gdc fails to see that floor() can be converted t
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:51:10 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
ps.
> 6. This change
> (https://github.com/nsf/pnoise/commit/baadfe20c7ae6aa900cb0e4188aa9d20bea95918)
>
with GDC has no effect at all.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:44:07 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
hm. for my "GDC 4.9.1. git HEAD" #6 has no effect at all.
p.s. it's unfair to specify "-msse3 -mfpmath=sse" for gcc and not for
gdc. gdc can use this flags too! (yeah, the effect is great: sse3
variant is ~2.5 times faster
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:44:07 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
p.s. what i did is this:
auto tm = Timer();
tm.start;
foreach (; 0..100) {
auto n2d = Noise2DContext(0);
foreach (i; 0..100) {
foreach (y; 0..256) {
foreach (x; 0..256) {
auto v = n2d.
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:09:02 +
Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> 64's default GDC
i think that 64-bit gcc/gdc turns sse optimisations on anyway, 'cause
there is no x86_64-capable CPUs without sse. and i'm on x86 arch.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 16:16:43 +0100
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> That's because floor isn't an intrinsic. The crippling speed issue
> was the fact that floor computed and returned at real precision.
i'm testing on x86, and the difference between 'call floorf' and
inlining is si
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:46:19 +
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> ..and it has just been merged! ^_^
WOW! that's great!
> Thanks Walter!
second that!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:16:14 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> * The 'User Defined Attributes (UDA)' chapter
great!
> * static this, static ~this, shared static this, and shared static
> ~this
and this too.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:16:14 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> * Formatted element output with %( and %)
by the way, i never knows about this feature. maybe i should RTFM
someday...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:18:42 +
safety0ff via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> What do you have against capitalizing 'I' ?
don't even noticed that until your post. but maybe that is 'cause i'm
not using capitals at all... ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:17:53 +
krzaq via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> If you're writing in a language, try to appear literate.
but what if i can't, for example? i can read (and understand without
dictionary, and with jokes too) books of Pratchett, Carrol, Adams, even
Tolkien with his "ye o
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:13:23 +
krzaq via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Negligence to
> do so is, to me, either extreme laziness or lack of respect to
> the reader.
neither, in fact. i believe that those rules are useless and senseless
now, so it's more like a "one man crusade". i know tha
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 07:55:36 +
safety0ff via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> It also appears unprofessional and uneducated.
so i am.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014 11:27:41 +
NCrashed via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
looks very interesting, thank you.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:02:01 +0200
Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> > The final executable size was 15 bytes.
> > The customer loved it.
and they never knows that it took at least 512 bytes anyway. or even
more, depending of claster size. heh.
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:47:40 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/templates_more.html
there is a little bug: opSlice(size_t, size_t) description is:
`collection[i, j]`
shouldn't it be: `collection[i..j]`?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:48:26 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Would you like to send me your name so that I add it to the
> Acknowledgments section. (Otherwise ketmar is it. :)
Ketmar, or Ketmar Dark if you want "full name". ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:20:04 -0700
Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> [1] http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/alias_this.html
heh, i just wanted to point at your book. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:24:55 +0200
simendsjo via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> My guess is the average for developers is ~8GB. 2GB RAM is really not
> enough for pretty much anything these days - the browser alone easily
> chews 3-4GB on moderate use. I recommend you just upgrade your
> compute
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:29:17 +0200
simendsjo via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> But if your parents want Facebook and Instagram, you better give them
> a pretty beefy computer.
i'll give 'em opera 12. yes, it's dead, but it's the only browser that
can work month by month without restarting (no,
Hello.
last night i ported ZMBV video codec to D. ZMBV is videocodec invented
by DosBox team to record old videogames' gameplay. if you are into
writing "old-school" games, it can be handy to embed the
possibility to creating gameplay video directly in your game.
it's only codec for now (i.e. it
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:51:06 +
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/985
>
> Here is initial port result available for early experiments. It
> can be compiled with make -f posix.mak GC_TYPE=concurrent and
> passes the test suite
On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:18:18 -0700
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> That's a good idea, but I hate environment variables affecting all D
> executables. They always wind up being inadvertently being left on,
> or off, or set for some unrelated purpose. It also would affect all D
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:14:29 +
Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> > i assume that not everyone are ready to build dmd from sources,
> Digger? What can be easier?
i've never used Digger, so i can't tell anything about it. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:14:29 +
Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> > i assume that not everyone are ready to build dmd from sources,
> Digger? What can be easier?
p.s. i mean that it will be good to have Digger mentioned somewhere at
the front page, with some usage samples, s
On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 10:33:46 -0700
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On 10/7/2014 11:58 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > maybe enable envvar-control in alphas/betas and disable in releases?
> I thought you were opposed to -release builds?
i'm opp
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:47:09 +0300
ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
p.s. i believe that there shouldn't be any flags that turns off range
checking. if someone wants to do it "fast", he can use pointer
arithmetics (this is exactly the same as using arrays with range chec
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 08:10:38 +
Dylan Knutson via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I'm sure there's a cross platform way to retrieve
> them without bring passed them directly
there isn't.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:54:25 +
Sean Kelly via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> >> I'm sure there's a cross platform way to retrieve them without
> >> bring passed them directly
> > there isn't.
> Runtime.args?
it's good, but it isn't modifiable. so programmer must manually ignore
gc-related
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:12:25 +
Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Friday, 17 October 2014 at 17:53:18 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > I've come to even hate anything GUI (except maybe the
> > editor), I'd hate to even think about browsing the file sys
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 01:29:30 +
Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> No. Really. I'm serious.
>
> https://github.com/Hackerpilot/dfix
>
> dfix is a tool for automatically upgrading older D syntax to the
> newer style.
>
> * Updates old-style alias syntax to new-style
> * Fixes
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:10:25 -0800
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> I know it's a tough call. But I do see these sorts of comments regularly, and
> it
> is a fact that there are too many D libraries gone to seed that won't compile
> anymore, and that makes us look bad.
but D w
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:22:51 +
Brian Schott via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> dfix is a tool for automatically upgrading the syntax of D source
> code.
>
> Changes since 0.1.1:
> * #1 dfix will now rewrite "const int foo() {}" to int foo()
> const {}"
> * #6 The C-style array syntax fix
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:33:29 +
Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Monday, 1 December 2014 at 07:53:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> > Well, I had tagged 1.0.0, then fixed a problem :-)
> Well 1.0.0 is reserved for the first stable release, usually
> you'd begin with 0.1.0 or s
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 01:48:55 +
krzaq via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Sure, this will eliminate spammers. But I wonder what the word of
> mouth will be:
> Have you tried asking on the D forum?
> Yeah, but they thought I was a spammer and wouldn't let me
> post.
> Oh, well, maybe try t
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:47:09 +0100
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On 2014-12-03 14:02, Martin Krejcirik wrote:
>
> > Asking for D feature names in not good IMHO.
>
> I agree. I try the demo at got a question about what this feature is called:
>
> auto u = new class M {};
>
1 - 100 of 357 matches
Mail list logo
