Re: [tdf-discuss] WPS Office native document files are officially supported in LibreOffice?
2016-11-06 7:26 GMT+01:00 Hugo Alejandro: > Hello everyone, although it seems insane, there are users that use native > file formats from "popular" office software as WPS Office. > > File extensions are: .wps for text document (different than ms works), .dps > for presentations and .et for spreedsheets. > > The funny thing is that 50% of files that I get with these types of > documents can be opened without problems, including encrypted files, > however, the other 50% there is a total or partial loss of information to > be > imported. Interestingly, I have not found information on whether these > formats are supported in LibreOffice, although the facts say yes. > > Is there such information or any place to get all currently supported files > by LibreOffice? I found a great number of questions in the LibreOffice > Ask, perhaps > adding a supported files table on the wiki or the document help works (I'd > like to help), considering it is one of the powerful features it has > LibreOffice, together with project as TDLP. > > -- > *Hugo* Hugo, the article on LibreOffice in the English-language version of Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreOffice) provides a list of supported file formats ; for example, it is noted that .wps files can be read, but not written to. I did not find any information regarding .dps or .et files Henri -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Munich and OpenSource
2014-08-20 14:49 GMT+02:00 M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com: 2014-08-20 13:38 GMT+02:00 Werner werner...@gmx.ch: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/08/19/munich_dumping_linux_for_windows/ I hope it won't ge going as far as some of these CDU politicians would like. Werner I hope so as well. Anyone at TDF who is better informed about this matter than the Reg (not a particularly high bar over which to jump) ?... Henri I note that *Tech Republic* claims that the situation is not as all as simple as portrayed in the *Reg* (which is not known for the most accurate journalism in the world, particularly when it comes to open source) : http://www.techrepublic.com/article/no-munich-isnt-about-to-ditch-free-software-and-move-back-to-windows/ Henri -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Munich and OpenSource
2014-08-20 13:38 GMT+02:00 Werner werner...@gmx.ch: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/08/19/munich_dumping_linux_for_windows/ I hope it won't ge going as far as some of these CDU politicians would like. Werner I hope so as well. Anyone at TDF who is better informed about this matter than the Reg (not a particularly high bar over which to jump) ?... Henri -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Happy Birthday, TDF!
2014-02-19 15:07 GMT+01:00 Jens Mildner j...@mildner-web.de: Florian Effenberger wrote Happy Birthday, Document Foundation! Congratulations from my side, too! It's a pleasure to watch TDF grow and prosper. But with TDF leaving its infancy, and a new board stepping up to continue the success story, maybe it's time to share a thought or two about the future. For me, there's two key points within TDF: First is independence, the way the foundation is set up, the hard-coded mixture rules for TDF's bodies, the democratic process, the donation-only funding (combined with a careful financial planning and only-spend-what-you-have attitude). Especially when I look at the other big non-profit entity aiming at software for end users, Mozilla, I get the strong gut feeling (without doing deeper research) that this independence is pure gold, and needs to be preserved no matter the cost. The second point is transparency, which is key for building the trust necessary to make donation-based funding models work, and therefore is key for TDF's independence, too. I'm not only talking about transparency of the decision-making process here, but also about financial transparency, development transparency, and so forth. And while TDF is already strong at both independence and transparency, it could still be better. So I suggest the following things: 1) Official statement of affiliation by every member of any official body of TDF, if there's none already present. 2) TDF becoming a member of the Initiative Transparente Zivilgesellschaft by Transparency Deutschland e. V., adhering to its 10-point code of conduct. [1] Having said that, I also think that TDF should broaden its scope of software development to truly free the desktop. In its values, it is stated that TDF commits to eliminate the digital divide in society by giving everyone access to office productivity tools free of charge to enable them to participate as full citizens in the 21st century. Personally, I think that things like a browser, email client, and personal information manager should also be considered as being office productivity tools, and therefore should be offered by TDF in the long run, too. This is even more true when I look at the current market for these kinds of software. I've read many times that the one big thing missing from OOo/LO is an Outlook replacement, which would be a combined email client/PIM thingie. And with Mozilla going into development directions that I call ambiguous at best, the question about which browser to use on Windows could be hard to answer in the not too distant future. So, two years of TDF is surely a time to celebrate, but probably also a time for discussing the course to a future even brighter. All the best, Jens Mildner [1] http://www.transparency.de/Initiative-Transparente-Zivilg.1612.0.html Contrary to Jens' point of view as expressed above, I'd like to suggest that, at least for the near future, TDF confines its activities to working to provide «everyone access to office productivity tools free of charge», in accordance with its statutes. This, which entails battling against Microsoft's entrenched quasi-monopoly, is a more than sufficiently daunting task, which will require all the efforts of which we are capable. Email clients, which in an age in which people are continually connected to the internet, are of minor use, are beyond its purview. Those who wish to use one can employ Thunderbird Rather than do many things poorly, let us do one thing well !... Henri -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Happy Birthday, TDF!
2014-02-17 12:55 GMT+01:00 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org: Dear community, allow me some personal words on this very special day: Happy Birthday, Document Foundation! It's unbelievable that it's already been two years. Two years to the day, The Document Foundation (TDF) was created as a stable, safe, secure, independent and longlasting entity, by the community, for the community, with strong values and ideals. Two years later, the LibreOffice community is one of the most vivid, valued and recognized free software projects, with truly wonderful and fantastic friends and contributors around the world, and has grown way beyond our dreams. I would like to personally thank all of you for making possible what looked impossible two years ago - you all truly rock, and all of you made TDF what it is today. I'm very proud and truly honoured to be part of this project, and to have been given a chance to shape it from the very beginning. It has been an interesting, exciting and unforgettable time for me, and I am looking forward to the next years, because a bright future is ahead of us. The new board, who will be on duty from tomorrow on, I wish all the very best for guiding TDF through the next two years. I am more than confident that we have wonderfully experienced, engaged and highly motivated contributors, who will take the right decisions at the right time to the very best of our community. Florian Many thanks to you, Florian, and to all those who have made TDF such a success !... Henri -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] City of München counters disinformation form proprietary provider
I imagine that many LO users will find the *following articlehttps://joinup.ec.europa.eu/news/city-munich-stands-its-calculation-open-source-saves-millions * of interest Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Happy Birthday, Document Foundation!
2013/2/17 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Hello everyone, exactly one year ago, February 17th 2012, The Document Foundation was established as a charitable Foundation under German law (gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts). So far, it has proven to be the ideal entity for reflecting the LibreOffice's community needs. I am proud and honoured to be part of this project, part of this community, and part of TDF. I would like to thank all of you who have contributed to the success of our common goal - all developers, marketeers, localizers, administrators, designers, testers, donors, adopters, users and everyone else involved. You have made possible what the community has been dreaming of for a decade, and we all can be excited about the future! Florian Many happy returns !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Initial Reactions to 4.0.0
2013/2/10 Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org I have not been able to install the final release, but I have a copy of RC2 installed. I have not yet had significant experience with it, but: First the bad: I only found one problem (new bug introduced into the macro language that prevents a struct from being assigned to a property in another struct), but Noel Power fixed that for release to 4.0.1 Sadly, the fix did not make it into 4.0.0. I found a work around, but I hate to change my existing macros for a bug that will be fixed soon. When will 4.0.1 be released? Now the good: My entire impression on the good is based on the fact that it just seems to render better. I don't want to go back just because it looks better. Unsure what was done with respect to fonts and rendering for this to be the case; maybe it is all in my head. Sadly, I have been significantly busier than usual, so I cannot comment on many other aspects of the release. The team has done a very good job. -- Andrew Pitonyak Andrew, the version available for download from the LibreOffice site as of yesterday, when I did so, was 4.0.0.3, so I presume that the bug you mentioned has been corrected. Perhaps you would care to check ?... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Initial Reactions to 4.0.0
2013/2/8 Robert Boehm boehm.robe...@gmail.com Hi alljust a short note to say that I did something I usually never do I went bold and installed LibreOffice 4.0.0 NOT waiting for the first point release. So far so good...this is a good releasenot aware of any bugs affecting the work that I do yet. Recommended it to another person who was using the 3.6 series and he also was bold and installed it...working fine. One thing that has already been noticed on the street is the MUCH faster start-up time for the cleaned up code... I just want to congratulate the entire LibreOffice development team for starting this new and exciting 4 versionwith all of the new features and speed, it just re-energized me in the promotion of this amazing project. For my part, I'll continue beta testing in Windows and Linux and submitting bug reports when I find them But this 4.0 seems to me to be the best initial release yet Thanks to everyone! Bob Boehm Can't wait for this release to become available in more languages than «English (USA)» !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Initial Reactions to 4.0.0
2013/2/9 webmaster-Kracked_P_P webmas...@krackedpress.com On 02/09/2013 02:34 PM, M Henri Day wrote: ... Can't wait for this release to become available in more languages than «English (USA)» !... Henri What is meant by that? 4.0.0 has all the language packs, as far as I can see, as 3.6.5 does. So it is in other languages than English. Sorry to disturb you, webmaster-kracked ; when I checked earlier, I couldn't find anything but the English (US) version, but after posting Luis Vásquez R was kind enough to point out in a private message that the new version was available in some 120 languages and I've already downloaded and installed the Swedish-language version Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Personal wishes at the end of the year
2012/12/23 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Dear friends, Dear community, the end of the year 2012 is approaching with large steps, and in most countries around the globe, whether they celebrate Christmas or not, the holiday season has just begun. People meeting with old friends, their families, their beloved ones, thinking about what has happened in the past twelve months, and looking forward to what is to come the next 365 days. For the LibreOffice community, The Document Foundation and also me personally, the current year has been an extraordinarily exciting one. One year ago, we weren't sure whether our plan to set up TDF in Berlin the way we wanted it to be - independent, meritocratic, open and transparent - would work out, or whether we had to redecide for another country. Shortly before Christmas, we received several concerns we had to address, but as all of you know, luckily everything went well, and on February 17th, The Document Foundation was finally incorporated in Berlin, marking not only a milestone in the history of free office suites, but also, I dare to say, in the history of foundations under German law (Stiftung). Since the creation of our very own legal entity, the LibreOffice project has seen a massive boost in activity once again. Individuals, governments and corporations from around the world have a rapidly growing interest in what we do, how we do, and how we govern ourselves. The LibreOffice community has been invited to dozens of events around the world, giving speeches, talking to major stakeholders, and, most important, fascinated more and more people to become a part of our community. This October, we have gathered in Berlin and celebrated a wonderful conference at the physical hometown of The Document Foundation, which to me marked the highlight of this year. I am very proud for being part of this community. Exciting times are behind us, and even more exciting times are ahead. When we started TDF more than two years ago, one of our strongest wishes was to keep this spirit and this momentum we have seen during the very first days - and today, I feel this spirit and this momentum have even grown further and continue to drive us day by day. I would like to thank all of you personally for what you have contributed to LibreOffice, The Document Foundation and free and open source software at large. I am honoured to be part of the free office community since summer 2004, and still, I am fascinated day by day to see this activity all over the world, people dedicating their heart and their passion to work on our common goal. In all those years, I not only met fantastic colleagues, but even more, true friends. We can all be proud and thankful for what we have achieved, and can anticipate the year 2013 with confidence, as great times are ahead - the best is yet to come. I wish all of you a wonderful holiday season, lots of time to spend with your beloved ones, time to recreate your soul and to relax, and time for those things in life that are truly important. Have a wonderful start into the new year, with lots of joy, health, success and luck, to achieve your goals and make your dreams come true. On behalf of millions of LibreOffice users worldwide, and very personally, thank you very much for everything you do, and looking forward to be working with you in the next year! Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year! Florian As an enthusiastic user, who never fails to promote LibO to others in relevant contexts, let me thank you, Florian, and all the others at TDF for all the work you have done to provide us with so outstanding a product ! Please do keep up the good work !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: TDF Statutes -- check over the EN version
2012/9/16 Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com Hi Florian, Le 2012-09-16 05:39, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi, Marc Paré wrote on 2012-09-16 08:19: The TDF/LibreOffice global websites use International language as its international language base. The documents will not be a legal document, but a translation of a legal document. The TDF is registered in Germany and the legal documents are in DE. the documents in their current form have been translated by a lawyer together with a native speaker. So, from my POV, we should definitely be very careful in changing words, and involving someone understanding the German legal system can't harm (I can't volunteer, I desperately lack time). Otherwise, I fear, we change the document according to sounds good, but screw up the meaning :-) Florian Yes, the exercise is not to make the document sound good, but to fix grammatical/spelling errors in EN, establish a proper form (i.e. title form should be uniform throughout the text) as well as make the document sensible. This, all keeping true to the DE document which supersedes it legally. The membership in the board of directors ends after term of office and the appointment of a successor, by death or by resignation, which is permissible at any time. -- this to me, in EN, is nonsensical. the sentence needs to be reformulated to correctly represent the DE version. There are more instances of incorrect use of punctuation that suggest the wrong intent of sentences. There should also be no spellingz errers. If the small team looking at the document is still not satisfactory, we should wait till we have a member(s) who is/are familiar with the German legal system to help. A reminder to us that the TDF/LibreOffice make use of international English on its site(s). Cheers, Marc -- Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com http://www.parEntreprise.com http://www.parentreprise.com/ parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF) parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.orghttp://www.libreoffice.org/ Marc, the distinction you make between *producing* a legal document and * translating* one is essential ; in cases of disagreement between versions, it would (here) be the original German version which prevails. Our task would rather be to improve the readability of the English language version, to the degree that such is required. I find your idea of putting the text on a wiki excellent Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Can sessions of LibreOffice be saved? - they can't in Xfce
2012/9/13 tashirosgt tash...@zianet.com Has anyone been able to save sessions of LibreOffice 3 writer? By saving the session, I mean that if you are editing a document and log out, when you log back in, LibreOffice will automatically open the document that you were editing. I cannot save sessions of LIbreOffice writer using the Xfce window manager. When I reported this as a bug to the Xfce site (https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8981) the bug was closed with the suggestion that LibreOffice writer is responsible for the problem. Is that true? - or can users of other window managers (such as MS Windows 7, Linux Gnome 3, LXDE etc.) save sessions of LibreOffice writer? Tashirosgt, on my setup - 64-bit Ubuntun12.04 with the Cinnamon desktop and running LibreOffice Version 3.6.0.1 (Build ID: 360m1(Build:101)), if, after logging out and logging in again, I click my Writer icon, the document I was working on re-appears, i e, it is preserved Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] TDF Statutes -- check over the EN version
2012/9/13 Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com Hi everyone, I was just re-reading the TDF Statutes web page[1] and would like to suggest that a small group of us review the EN version (translation) from the point of view of syntax, form and readability. I have already made a few spelling corrections on the page, but I find that it is in need of a review as it does not read well at all. I am taking into account that this is a translation from the legal DE version and that it is written in legalese. I believe the EN document needs close attention as most visitors to the site who are serious in documenting our Charter and Statutes are offered this document which I find could be improved while still maintaining the integrity of the original DE text. If we could have 4-5 of us, at least on DE member who is familiar (or who want to be familiar with the DE document). We could put the text on a wiki page (temporarily) and work with the corrections/improvements from there. This should not take long. I would also ask if Jean Hollis-Weber could help out with this if she has time. The text needs some TLC from the point of view of punctuation, syntax, form and all that is of EN grammatical rules. This document is especially important to the project. We need to get this page right. It defines who we are and how we do it. Cheers, Marc [1] http://www.documentfoundation.org/foundation/statutes/ Marc, I don't know how exclusive you intend to be with your reference to «a small group of us», but I'd be happy to help in refining the English-language text Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] [QA] LibreOffice 3.6.1.1 first tests results
2012/8/16 Carlo Strata carlo.str...@tiscali.it Ciao Everyone! My current notebook system: - OpenSuSE 12.1, updated, gnome 3.4.1, Kernel Linux 3.1.10-63-desktop, x86-64 (on an Intel EM64T Cpu), italian GUIed; - nVidia GeForce 9500M GS - 512 Mbyte dedicated Video RAM, kernel integrated nouveau driver; - LibreOffice vanilla Version *3.6.1.1* (Build ID: 4db6344), italian GUIed. In the LibreOffice *3.6.0.4* first tests I dealt with this bugs: - system integratiion file association fails (even though .../desktop-integration/**libreoffice3.6-suse-menus-3.6.**0-104.noarch.rpm was installed); - italian dictionary doesn't seem to check the words (none incorrect were underlined); - importing a pdf file results in a read only opened Draw document and the read only state still remains/persists after saving as a LibreOffice Draw file (odg file). In the first 3.6.1.1 - that I have just downloaded and installed - test all of upper bugs seem to be fixed! :-) Fine work from tester and developer and bug fixer! Have a nice and sunny day! Carlo Encouraging ! Mille grazie !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] The City Hall of Vieira do Minho adopts Free Software (LibreOffice)
2012/3/10 mcande...@cm-vminho.pt PRESS RELEASE The City Hall of Vieira do Minho adopts Free Software (LibreOffice) The City Hall of Vieira do Minho has definitively adopted the productivity software LibreOffice around its computing park. This productivity package includes Writer, word processing and editing of web pages, Calc (Spreadsheet), creating and editing spreadsheets, Impress, creating and editing multimedia presentations, Draw, creating and editing drawings, diagrams and graphs , Base (Database), creating and editing Databases and Math (Equation Editor). With this change to a Free Software, besides the lack of a financial burden due to the inexistence of licensing (Free Software), this City Hall has adopted open standards in accordance with Law 36/2011 of 21 June. It has also started the standardization and universality of digital formats in the files used by the City Hall and its residents. This type of software enables the use of a variety of operating systems for use of various tools, it has been adopted internationally with very positive and encouraging results, it has the ability to import / export various proprietary formats (Word files, Excel, Powerpoint, Outlook, etc.) and establishes the native creation of PDF files. Other interesting feature of the software is to be fully in Portuguese and have writing tools also in Portuguese. Regarding the management of employees ' electronic mail, the City Hall has adopted the Thunderbird program, also a Free Software. With this measure, the City Hall of Vieira do Minho aims to demonstrate that the definitive adoption of free software in many areas of public administration is not only desirable but also essential for a more modern and financially sustainable Public Service. Vieira do Minho March 8, 2012 Communication Office Encouraging !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Can we replace Floppy Disk
2011/12/30 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net On 12/30/2011 08:12 AM, M Robinson wrote: ... I haven't heard of Delete/Eraser that works as well on SSDs as traditional hard drives. That said USB will be the most common storage media soon enough. Who saves to CDs at work? I don't think the icon is a big deal, the whole interface is dated, I pitched a Firefox addon-like interface a while back, but I'm still ahead of my time on that. Rather than reinventing the wheel, update the saveicon with a stock USB icon: a vertical USB icon, it looks like a human carrying stuff and you have the integrated download arrow, and it is a recognized symbol on cameras, phones, TVs, etc. http://imagebin.org/190980 Rather than reinvent the wheel: Stock icons: GNOME Humanity: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gnome-icon-theme/trunk/scalable/actions/document-save.svg [my system Humanity: /usr/share/icons/Humanity/actions/16/document-save.svg matches the one from freedesktop.org] Tango: http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/tango/tango-icon-theme/32x32/actions/document-save.png?view=co [which is not used by LO when the Tango theme is selected - LO still uses a floppy with the Tango theme. My system Tango: /usr/share/icons/Tango/22x22/actions/document-save.png matches the one from freedesktop.org] freedesktop.org Icon Theme Specification: http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html document-save The icon for the save action. Should be an arrow pointing down and toward a hard disk. I suspect that LO are still using these icons for Tango: http://jimmac.musichall.cz/i.php?i=Tango-OOo [Tango OpenOffice.org 2.0 -Note this artwork is not public domain.] However, that standard Tango icons *are* public domain: http://tango.freedesktop.org/ quote Terms Of Use The Tango base icon theme is released to the Public Domain. The palette is in public domain. Developers, feel free to ship it along with your application. The icon naming utilities are licensed under the GPL. Though the tango-icon-theme package is released to the Public Domain, we ask that you still please attribute the Tango Desktop Project, for all the hard work we've done. Thanks. /quote Personally, I like the arrow pointing downward towards a harddisk (would look much the same if it were interpreted as an SSD), but please give us some advance notice, so that I can prepare myself for the task of explaining to my retirees «what they did with the TV on my screen» :-) Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Can we replace Floppy Disk
2011/12/30 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@openoffice.org On 28/12/2011 Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Danishka Navin wrote: Why we still continue the Floppy Disk as the icon for Save button in LibreOffice? When was the last time you saw a phone that look like http://iphonestudio.co.uk/**images/uber_iphone_phone_logo.**jpghttp://iphonestudio.co.uk/images/uber_iphone_phone_logo.jpg Ironically that 70 years old design is still used on IPhone and others modern cell-phone to indicate: 'telephone' Indeed. An icon is just a convention to convey a meaning and it should not necessarily be a representation of reality. One doesn't usually look for words in a document using a binocular or a magnifying glass, but people can easily associate these icons to Find. For those who want to practice their Italian or stress-test machine translation, here's a nice short and funny article from 1996 by the famous writer Umberto Eco: Icons everywhere? No thanks, I can read. http://tecfa.unige.ch/staf/**staf9597/beltrame/STAF13/eco.**htmlhttp://tecfa.unige.ch/staf/staf9597/beltrame/STAF13/eco.html Regards, Andrea. As a counter to Professor Eco's brief - and as always in his case, witty critique of icons, may I suggest that interested users test his conclusions by launching Writer, clicking Tools and selecting Customise and then Toolbars, clicking the Toolbar button and finally selecting «Text only». * Pace* Professor Eco, but I suspect that all who do so will immediately reselect «Icons only» Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Holiday Greetings
2011/12/25 drew d...@baseanswers.com This has been quite a year for the extended community and communities of individuals formed since the decision to open source the original StarOffice application suite some 12 years ago. Then again the same could be said for the entire dozen years - and here is my meager attempt to capture that in 2 minutes... http://youtu.be/J84WQtbcZ1s Merry Christmas ~~ Drew Jensen Loved the video ! And thanks to you, Drew, and all the developers who have helped to bring us products like StarOffice, OpenOffice, and LibreOffice ! And happy Winter Solstice (for us in the Northern hemisphere) to you all !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice in press release about extensions
2011/11/8 Christophe Strobbe christophe.stro...@esat.kuleuven.be Hi Italo, At 13:01 8-11-2011, Italo Vignoli wrote: Christophe Strobbe wrote: LibreOffice (http://www.libreoffice.org/) is a free and open-source office suite developed by The Document Foundation as a fork of OpenOffice.org. The Document Foundation was formed in September 2010 and has released several new versions of LibreOffice since that time. New code in LibreOffice is developed under a double license: GNU Lesser General Public License Version 3 (LGPLv3) and the Mozilla Public License (MPL). I don't like as a fork of OOo, and I would rather prefer based on OOo source code. Of course, the concept of the fork is correct, but as the reality is that every flavour of the legacy StarOffice source code is now a fork (AOOo is more of a fork than LibreOffice) I would avoid to label LibreOffice as such. Thanks for your comment. I have changed the paragraph to: LibreOffice (http://www.libreoffice.org/) is a free and open-source office suite based on the OpenOffice.org source code. It is a community-driven project of The Document Foundation. The Document Foundation was formed in September 2010 and has released several new versions of LibreOffice since that time. New code in LibreOffice is developed under a double license: GNU Lesser General Public License Version 3 (LGPLv3) and the Mozilla Public License (MPL). Best regards, Christophe -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Twitter: @RabelaisA11y Good suggestion by italo, well implemented by Christophe. Kudos to both of you !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Candidacy for Board of Directors seat -- Bjoern Michaelsen [UPDATE]
2011/9/28 Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com Hi all, On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:55:00 +0200 Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote: What will I be doing, should I get elected? TDF and the Libreoffice project have already come a long way since their birth less than a year ago. As a developer I will represent that part of the community, but I will also try to help grow the channels of communication between developers and other parts of the project. Being responsible for the complete product on the Ubuntu platform, I firmly believe all parts of the project are not only important, but also need a shared vision of what needs to be accomplished to create an even better product. As it is always hard to put such abstract topics down in a few sentences, the above is just a short overview. However, just two days ago, somebody who I highly regard for his skills in open source software project management put in words most of what I was trying to say -- as bluntly as usual. Here is the interview (with Linus Torvalds): http://h30565.www3.hp.com/t5/Feature-Articles/Linus-Torvalds-s-Lessons-on-Software-Development-Management/ba-p/440 Best, Bjoern Bjørn, the following is not intended as a swipe at you personally, but I must say that the introduction of the Unity UI on Ubuntu has not been the sort of thing that I should like to see occur on LibreOffice. My impression is that objections from users have been disregarded in a cavalier manner, and that we were faced with an attitude of my way or the highway. Not encouraging Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Candidacy for Board of Directors seat -- Bjoern Michaelsen [UPDATE]
2011/9/28 Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com Hi Henri, On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:50:06 +0200 M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com wrote: Bjørn, the following is not intended as a swipe at you personally, but I must say that the introduction of the Unity UI on Ubuntu has not been the sort of thing that I should like to see occur on LibreOffice. My impression is that objections from users have been disregarded in a cavalier manner, and that we were faced with an attitude of my way or the highway. Not encouraging No need to assume I would take this personal. Although I did some technical work on integrating Libreoffice into Unity as well as in other desktops, I have not been involved at all with the decision to make Unity the default desktop (you can actually easily confirm that from the date when I joined Canonical). Aside from that: I am running for the seat personally, not to represent my employer. The initiative for this came from me alone(*). Best, Bjoern Björn, no need to assume that I shouldn't take you at your word when you say you had nothing to do with the Unity decision ; if you joined Canonical later, you certainly can't be held responsible. Nor did I assume that you were runnning as a representative of your employer, but based on your mention of the fact that you (now) work for Canonical, I did in fact have some questions regarding your attitude towards relations with the wider user community. These questions have now been resolved to my satisfaction ; thank you for doing so Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Candidacy: Personal Profile of a Marketer
2011/9/24 Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com PLEASE BE WARNED, THIS IS NOT A TOTALLY SERIOUS PROFILE Who am I? At 57, I am the grandfather of The Document Foundation, but I can anticipate that you will find me jumping around for a long time as I plan to work full time on advocating FOSS when I will retire in eight years (good marketing planning looks at the long term...). During my working life, I have done quite a few things, that you can find summarized in my Linkedin profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/italovignoli. If you want to know how I ended up in marketing of technology products with a background in humanities, you can read my very personal story, which I wrote for the tenth anniversary of ComputerWorld Italy: http://www.linkedin.com/in/italovignoli. The story is in Italian, but I can anticipate that it is written in a style which makes Google Translate shine, apart from some hiccups. Of course, this is the absolute truth. It all happened in June 1982. What I have done for TDF? Don't look at statistics, as you won't find my name anywhere. I've just tried to do what I know best: provide some marketing advice, and try to make TDF and LibreOffice as popular as possible by engaging the media. I have also gone a few miles around to represent TDF at conferences in Chicago, Zagreb and Athens, and I will also be speaking at LinuxCon Europe in Prague in October. What motivates me to work for TDF? I have a professional challenge: with a marketing budget of zero (in letters it looks bigger), outsmart corporations with a marketing budget with six or more zeros (and with a number in front which makes it more significant). I have managed to achieve this objective at OOo in Italy, and I would like to achieve the same objective at TDF. What will I be doing, should I get elected? I promise that I will never write a single line of code, and this is quite important for software stability. In addition, I will cook pasta at hackfests and on spare time I will handle some marketing and media relations. I am also going to have an awful lot of fun, as any serious grandfather deserves when he is close to retiring. END OF PARTIALLY SERIOUS PROFILE I promise I will be more serious when answering additional enquiries. Ciao, Italo -- Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com mobile +39.348.5653829 VoIP +39.02.320621813 skype italovignoli Was looking forward to reading your very personal story, Italo - without the aid of Google Translate - but was unable to find it on the Linkedin page to which you linked above. Is the following the blog you had in mind ( http://www.cwi.it/2010/02/01/nasce-il-nuovo-blog-sistemaperto-riflessioni-in-liberta-sullopen-source/) or, if not, could you point me to another ?... Henri -- *老朽 頓首 M Henri Day, PhD, MD Stadshagsvägen 22, 5tr S-112 50 Stockholm SUÈDE Tel : +46 8 6183098 Email : mhenri...@gmail.com Skype/Google Talk : mhenriday http://mhenriday.googlepages.com http://mhenriday.blogspot.com/ http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/mhenriday/* *Re**gistered Linux user : #451735* -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Candidacy: Personal Profile of a Marketer
2011/9/24 Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com M Henri Day wrote: Was looking forward to reading your very personal story, Italo - without the aid of Google Translate - but was unable to find it on the Linkedin page to which you linked above. Is the following the blog you had in mind ( http://www.cwi.it/2010/02/01/nasce-il-nuovo-blog-sistemaperto-riflessioni-in-liberta-sullopen-source/ ) or, if not, could you point me to another ?... Sorry, the link was totally wrong, I have re-sent the message with the right link: http://www.italovignoli.com/?p=557 -- Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com mobile +39.348.5653829 VoIP +39.02.320621813 skype italovignoli Thanks for correcting the link, Italo ; I enjoyed the story !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [QA] Opening a .doc file - Regression in Libreoffice 3.4 ???
2011/8/24 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net On 08/23/2011 01:47 PM, Sveinn í Felli wrote: Sorry if this is not the proper list to ask, but before filing a bug I'd like to know if someone has seen this before: The following .doc file does open correctly in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 but neither in LibreOffice 3.4.2 nor in LibreOffice 3.4.3 OOO340m1 (Build:301) - tested on Debian and LinuxMint: http://www.tullverket.se/download/18.4ab1598c11632f3ba9280009674/enhetsdokument+anvands+vid+import+och+export+4+blad_tv718_3.doc Seems like a problem with lookup in many fields (Error: Source reference not found), also looks like cell formatting is separated onto another page than the form tables. Curiously in LibreOffice 3.4.3 OOO340m1 the file is always opened as read-only, no matter which permissions or filesystem is used. Of course this could simply be a corrupted file, still it opens correctly in OOo. Any ideas ? Regards, Sveinn í Felli Opens fine in OOo 3.2.1 (go-oo/Ubuntu version), OOo 3.3.0, and OOo-Dev 3.4.0 . Does *not* open properly in *any* LO versions that I currently have installed (3.3.3 and 3.4.2). You've found YALOB (Yet Another LO Bug); of which there seem to more more of every day oddly enough with previous OOo files. I see rapid regression with *every* new LO update and have actually started using older OOo go-oo packages for stability. Note to others who may think that I do not use or have installed LO: $ locate versionrc /opt/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/libreoffice3.4/basis3.4/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice3.4/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice3.4/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/ooo-dev/basis3.4/program/versionrc /opt/ooo-dev/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/ooo-dev3/program/versionrc /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.3/program/versionrc /opt/openoffice.org/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/openoffice.org3/program/versionrchttp://openoffice.org/ure/bin/versionrc%0A/opt/openoffice.org3/program/versionrc /usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.2/program/versionrc /usr/lib/openoffice/program/versionrc /usr/lib/ure/bin/versionrc and I have LO installed for testing on Ubuntu 11.04 and 11.10. As a follow up to NoOp's comment above, I can here mention that on my build - LibreOffice 3.3.3 (OOO330m19 (Build:301) libreoffice-3.3.3.1, Ubuntu package 1:3.3.3-1ubuntu2) - on 64-bit Ubuntu 11.04, this EU customs document opens in highly distorted form : no text in some fields/pages, pages come in erroneous order, and in many fields, the following text appears : «Fel: Det gick inte att hitta referenskällan», which, for the sake of both importers and exporters, I hope does not appear on the original form Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Enhancement Request: Comment Ranges
2011/6/16 Charles Jenkins cejperso...@tec-usa.com Cristoph wrote: What I'm currently unsure about - how to proceed. Although I'm not that convinced about voting, maybe it should be added to: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Vote_for_Enhancement I did it! The wiki finally let me edit the page! Now that we can find Bug 38244 under the section for voting on Enhancements to Writer, I'd like to ask everyone with an interest in this issue to please sign up and add your vote. If you use Track Changes to work with an editor, you probably need this feature! :-) Charles, I'm happy to hear that you were able to edit the page, but less happy that, despite signing in, I couldn't find any way to register my vote. A step-by-step for the intellectually challenged ?... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] List of supported formats in LibreOffice Draw.
Back in February, SVG was added to the list of formats natively supported in LibreOffice Draw. Can anyone help me find a link to a webpage that lists * all* such formats ? Many thanks !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Enhancement Request: Easier Graphic Insertion
2011/6/10 Charles Jenkins charles.jenk...@tec-usa.com Hi, everyone! I'm new here. I have a feedback to offer, and I was told this is the place to do it. In my day job as an engineer, I currently use Microsoft Word to write technical documentation which includes screenshot images. I'd like to break the Word habit. I understand that when creating publications like newsletters, some people may need to place graphics in a particular spot on the page and have text flow around it. However, I think most business and casual users -- and certainly someone like myself who produces technical documentation -- need to have the graphics flow along with the text. In other words, we need the graphics to be anchored as a character. I know LibreOffice can do this, but it is not the default behavior, and to fix it after inserting a picture involves a lot of work: The initial paste is almost guaranteed to put the anchor in the wrong place, and even after moving it, you typically have to go into the Picture dialog box to fix Position attributes. Microsoft Word and the Macintosh word processors I'm familiar with insert pictures anchored as a character by default. Though many other things are disastrously wrong with Microsoft Word, I have to admit that they do picture insertion just right. With LibreOffice, adding a screenshot is quite a frustrating battle for me. If Insert Pictures Anchored as Characters were only an option turned ON by default, LibreOffice would be much more usable for me, and I suspect many others, at work. -- Charles Agreed ! Simplifying the procedures necessary to implement a desired action would greatly facilitate promoting LibreOffice to prospective users unaccustomed to wending their way through complicated series of steps in order to accomplish what to them are/should be relatively simple tasks. I'm by no means asking for a ribbon, but a GUI which would allow one to, say, insert an image in a running text would be most welcome indeed !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Installing Language Pack
2011/6/11 johnerskine johnerskine1...@gmail.com Henri This worked - many thanks! John Glad to have been able to be of help !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] When will 3.4 be available in Ubuntu ppa
2011/6/10 theTechnaddict thetechnadd...@gmail.com I love the improvements of 3.4 - if nothing else it loads so much faster and works better (with Ubuntu 11.04). I also enjoy the benefits of repositories. There's a ppa for libreOffice but this still has 3.3.2 files in it. I can install from debs, I know, but the question is - when will the ppa have 3.4? Let me second (third) this question. I only hope that we don't get a response of the type - when you chaps get off your posteriors and write a new package !... Henri Great work, I've stopped looking around for an alternative to OpenOffice and look forward instead to the developments in this project. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/When-will-3-4-be-available-in-Ubuntu-ppa-tp3047804p3047804.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- *老朽 頓首 M Henri Day, PhD, MD Stadshagsvägen 22, 5tr S-112 50 Stockholm SUÈDE Tel : +46 8 6183098 Email : mhenri...@gmail.com Skype/Google Talk : mhenriday http://mhenriday.googlepages.com http://mhenriday.blogspot.com/ http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/mhenriday/* -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice
2011/6/10 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com On Jun 10, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Volker Merschmann wrote: Hi, 2011/6/10 Thorsten Behrens t...@documentfoundation.org: BRM wrote: Clearly marking the website, signatures, etc. for TDF would probably go a long ways in helping to end that conversation. Since we're now down to debating cosmetics - could we please end the discussion here all get back to work? TDF will be legally established in due course, quite a few people are working on that. Some more fundamental (not just cosmetical) insights actually have been published by the FSF: http://www.fsf.org/news/openoffice-apache-libreoffice I would recommend that TDF make their own determinations... After all, it would be trivially easy for someone at the ASF to make a counterpoint blogpost recommending AL... If people are swayed by what FSF (or anyone else) says without giving thoughtful and honest consideration for their *own* s/w, then FOSS is in big, big trouble. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted «After all, it would be trivially easy for someone at the ASF to make a counterpoint blogpost recommending AL...» Isn't that precisely what you've done in the above, Jim ? You seem to ignore the fact that FSF recommended the following : «[a]nybody who plans to use or contribute to one of these productivity suites should understand how these policies affect them, and consider which better complement their own goals», which strikes me as both objective and reasonable and then, on the basis of its own analysis, suggested that LibreOffice contributes more to the cause of free software. What's the beef ?... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] FYI: Apache Incubator is now voting
2011/6/10 Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com Hi all, I just wanted to bring an FYI that the Apache Incubator has begun its voting process on accepting the OO.o proposal to become a podling within the Incubator. At the moment, it appears to be passing by a huge margin, with only two dissenting votes[1] at this time. The Apache process recognizes two types of votes: * binding votes are from those who have a recognized ability to participate in the process. These votes are the ones which will be counted. * non-binding votes are from other participants in the conversation. Their votes are allowed as a measure and gauge over the broader community opinion, even though they will not actually be tallied in the final ballot. If you wish to make your voice heard, then I would encourage you to respond to the [VOTE] thread on gene...@incubator.apache.org (I would think gmane[2] is your best way to respond to the thread without having to actually subscribe). Cheers, -g [1] the dissenting votes are non-binding, fwiw [2] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/29904 ps. my advance apologies if you feel this post is inappropriate for these two TDF forums. I felt obliged to include you all in this process, though I do understand that it may not be welcome. Speaking solely for myself, Greg, your post was not at all unwelcome ; on the contrary, thanks for keeping us informed as to what is going on !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice
2011/6/8 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:36 PM, M Henri Day wrote: left out. As I see it, the upshot of the matter is that TDF would best be advised to devote its limited resources to improving LibreOffice, rather than to working to please the lawyerly mind I would suggest, as an outsider, that TDF continue the lawyerly efforts in finalizing its foundation, non-profit, governance, models. There is nothing worse, or more dangerous, than an almost created foundation. ;) Good point, Jim ! I amend my comment to read as follows : As I see it, the upshot of the matter is that TDF, after completing the procedure necessary for establishing itself as a non-profit foundation according to the laws and regulations governing such in the country (Germany) in which it is registered, would best be advised to devote its limited resources to improving LibreOffice, rather than to working to please the lawyerly mind and complying with all the regulations required to accept a possible «donation» from a legal entity registered in the United States. Hope the above will suffice !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice
2011/6/8 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:04 PM, NoOp wrote: Repeat. On 06/06/2011 06:05 PM, NoOp wrote: On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: ... Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly clear that this is it... This is one promise I fully expect Oracle will keep :/ Interesting... Could you clarify that statement? 1. @ASF: What happens to OOo if ASF votes *not* to accept the OOo project into the incubator? And it that is the case, what happens to the OOo software that has been granted to the ASF by Oracle? ... Was it your intention to pop into this list with: Hello! I have also just subscribed to both discuss@ and steering-discuss@ in hopes that if there are questions here regarding OOo, LOo, TDF and the ASF, I can respond. I'm also here to also ask that if you feel more comfortable emailing me directly, that is fine as well. and no longer respond to questions? The questions are, IMO, valid and are important - both for OOo and TDF/LO. Sorry I did not reply to this email in a timely manner... although I have replied to others, I did not have time to answer this one; I have been traveling and am at a conference and so sincere apologies for taking 2 days to reply. I think that should OOo not be approved as an incubator podling, then there are 3 main options. The first is that the ASF could refuse the grant, at which point they would remain Oracle property. I think that some people would want to do that; the ASF is not in the business of accepting stuff that it has no intention of using. The 2nd is that the ASF accept the grant and simply place the tarball on a server somewhere and say here it is. The ASF would let the OOo trademark die. The 3rd would be that the ASF would donate the code and the trademark to someone else; there is no guarantee that it would be to TDF or anyone else to TDFs liking, since we have no idea who it would be or could be donated to. I will say that it is unfortunate that there is sooo much distrust on both sides, because it really prevents us from having the type of open and honest discussions required. There are people who see TDF's resistance to working with the ASF as a simple ploy to get the ASF to donate the code (and trademark) to them, acting for what seems as what is in their best interest, rather than the best interest of the community in general. Same as those who see the ASF as more interested in taking over than in working with people. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted Jim, thank you for your considered - and considerate ! - reply. The circumstances being what they are, would not the best path for ASF to take(as seems to me to be the case) be to accept the grant (in the event Oracle is offering it *nulla condicione astrictus*) and then donate both the code and the trademark to TDF, given the great work that the latter has been doing on LibreOffice ?... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to join Apache OpenOffice
2011/6/8 toki toki.kant...@gmail.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Henri wrote: The circumstances being what they are, would not the best path for ASF to take(as seems to me to be the case) be to accept the grant (in the event Oracle is offering it *nulla condicione astrictus*) Assuming that Oracle is offering the code, trademarks, etc to The Apache Software Foundation under the usual Apache Software grant (http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt), I'm not convinced that The Apache Software Foundation could make that donation. Whilst Distribute and sublicense is legally acceptable, a flat out donation is skating on thin ice. (The exception would be if The Apache Software Foundation was being dissolved, and in that specific situation, the code would have to be donated under the Apache License to an organization that had 501(c)(3) status. Equivalent status in a jurisdiction outside of the United States does not count.) Furthermore, whilst it is fine to ask for the donation, lawyers from both The Apache Software Foundation and The Document Foundation would have to verify that the donation was legal in both jurisdictions. (United States, and Germany.) (Going by memory, the paperwork to solicit donations in DE is only 20 pages long, and about 30 days to complete.) Jim wrote: then I would expect that they/we would spent quite a bit of time determining the best place for it.. That place being somewhere that The Apache Software Foundation can place the code, and be in compliance with US Law, Delaware Law, The Apache Software Foundation by-laws, the laws of the state that the recipient organization is in, and the by-laws of the organization in which it is placed. Somewhere that the Apache Software Foundation legal team can ensure that is kosher for _both_ parties. TANSTAAFL wrote: Where *else* would even be a *remotely* viable candidate? There might be no viable candidates. Just because _The Document Foundation_ has filled out most of the paperwork for Germany, does not mean that it can be the recipient of any donations from the United States. For starters, has The Document Foundation filled out any of the legally required paperwork to solicit donations in any state of the United States? (Fortunately, the same form can be used in most of the states. However, it still has to be customized for each state.) I'd suggest that the reason Oracle apparently ignored the letter sent by The Document Foundation to them, was to avoid any potential penalties imposed by the State of California. Whilst the penalty is chump change, it is cheaper to avoid the potential situation of having to pay that penalty in the first place. Especially when you are giving something away. jonathon - -- If Bing copied Google, there wouldn't be anything new worth requesting. If Bing did not copy Google, there wouldn't be anything relevant worth requesting. DaveJakeman 20110207 Groklaw. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN79oYAAoJEERA7YuLpVrVKw4H/iWX9UgdTGfzNYrJH6AeP9NJ /bmbgXXaakIGStWkWsWH4qJEVpQVm4EzjNRjeI5wm5JA/qZIkT60GNK8LkF8oZLV wWt7QPh0YDp3EFQKW34+FlxIL5AkjZaDRJDMtZ9LO3UHoiXoCpdaZWAAusz1zhlP dZUjszM9gM3+8XaOAwNMTrutQBRXHCUqeGokzb6h0MIQ6ubXj3j/Y1680eJ4XAKK q9gA+y7UzV3ZYF1hFCEk5iBiJJ2zoKaJsylVINTIZ/rAUwYl8OCW2j3IJwufa4Qf WzFqS+i6DrDS6TB9INTtuDewVVms09zS91Cj9TI1au5nbUF8Hnnw8E+lzjDn65A= =MjIw -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thanks, Toki - problems of the type you describe are the reason I added the stipulation «nulla condicione astrictus». But you are no doubt entirely correct - one can't just give things away ; instead the recipient has to demonstrate that they fulfil certain specifications. Otherwise, the lawyers and legislators - all too often in the same person - would feel themselves left out. As I see it, the upshot of the matter is that TDF would best be advised to devote its limited resources to improving LibreOffice, rather than to working to please the lawyerly mind Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Oracle contributes OOo Code to Apache Software Foundation's Incubator
2011/6/1 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net quote REDWOOD SHORES, CA--(Marketwire - Jun 1, 2011) - With today's proposal to contribute the OpenOffice.org code to The Apache Software Foundation's Incubator, Oracle continues to demonstrate its commitment to the developer and open source communities. Donating OpenOffice.org to Apache gives this popular consumer software a mature, open, and well established infrastructure to continue well into the future. The Apache Software Foundation's model makes it possible for commercial and individual volunteer contributors to collaborate on open source product development. -- Luke Kowalski, vice president, Oracle Corporate Architecture Group. /quote More: http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm It will be interesting to see how this works out how TDF will work with ASF. Fascinating, NoOp - wheels within wheels ! Thanks for posting this !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Oracle contributes OOo Code to Apache Software Foundation's Incubator
2011/6/1 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net On 06/01/2011 09:23 AM, M Henri Day wrote: 2011/6/1 NoOp ... More: http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm It will be interesting to see how this works out how TDF will work with ASF. Fascinating, NoOp - wheels within wheels ! Thanks for posting this !... Henri TDF's Statement: http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/06/01/statement-about-oracles-move-to-donate-openoffice-org-assets-to-the-apache-foundation/ Bravo, TDF - this is precisely the attitude we need !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Comparison of LO and OO downloads for a non-English language
2011/5/29 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@openoffice.org M Henri Day wrote: 2011/5/28 Stefan Weigel stefan.weigel@... As far as I know, it´s an issue of data volume on the download servers. Which, no doubt, is an question of money. Actually it is just a choice: it does lower the barrier for someone to host a mirror, but the size and upload time are comparable; the ratio between the space needed to host LibreOffice and OpenOffice.org is not an order of magnitude but something like 1/5 or 1/6, especially now that LibreOffice partially dropped support for several dozens of languages (that were actually untranslated). You should also consider that the help pack is kind of optional in LibreOffice, since LibreOffice relies on online (i.e., on a website) help as its primary help system. Regards, Andrea. If, indeed, Andrea, this is a choice between two more or less equal alternatives (from tdf's point of view), I should like to suggest that the alternative in which help packages, etc, for non-English-language version are bundled together with the main (US-English) download be adopted, so the need for users to download and install two or three different packages is obviated Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Comparison of LO and OO downloads for a non-English language
I've been wondering for some time why downloading a stable Swedish version of LO is more complicated than downloading a stable Swedish version of OO (I presume this is also the case for other non-English languages, but I've not tried). Below a table which displays the difference : *(64-bit) Ubuntu 10.10 :* * LibO_3.3.2_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz 163 MB * LibO_3.3.2_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_sv.tar.gz 2.1 MB (sv - Svenska) * LibO_3.3.2_Linux_x86-64_helppack-deb_sv.tar.gz 9.9 MB (sv - Svenska) Download now! Start downloading OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 for Linux Debian 64-bit in Swedish. (Java Runtime Environment (JRE) included for all OS versions except Linux 32/64-bit Debian and Mac OS) * (64-bit) Windows 7 :* * LibO_3.3.2_Win_x86_install_multi.exe 214 MB * LibO_3.3.2_Win_x86_helppack_sv.exe 9.6 MB (sv - Svenska) Download OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 Click to start downloading the most recent version for Windows and Swedish (Java Runtime Environment (JRE) included for all versions except Linux 32/64-bit Debian and Mac OS) As the table makes clear, for 64-bit Linux Debian, two more files must be downloaded and installed in the case of LO than in the case of OO. For Windows, one more file is required. This means that when helping retirees install an alternative to MS Office, I find myself turning to OO rather than LO, which I prefer for my own use. If the respective helppacks and langpacks can be included in stable versions of OO for non-English languages, I fail to understand why the same thing cannot be done for LO versions. But perhaps I am missing something here ?... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Comparison of LO and OO downloads for a non-English language
2011/5/28 Stefan Weigel stefan.wei...@bildungskreis.org Hi, Am 28.05.2011 19:44, schrieb M Henri Day: If the respective helppacks and langpacks can be included in stable versions of OO for non-English languages, I fail to understand why the same thing cannot be done for LO versions. But perhaps I am missing something here ?... As far as I know, it´s an issue of data volume on the download servers. Stefan -- LibreOffice - Die Freiheit nehm' ich mir! Which, no doubt, is an question of money. Thanks, Stefan, that explains it. Sometimes liberty is not that easy to seize !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Math: There is no
2011/5/4 Olivier Hallot olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org Thanks Mike for the tip As I see, this character U+2204, does not exist in Opensymbol font, used by Math by default. At least not in the displayed characters of Math UI. So, if this symbol get implemented in Opensymbol, it will be trivial to make it show in the Element window Olivier Olivier, in Linux operating systems such as, e g, Ubuntu, symbols like the ∄ symbol can easily be inserted in a LibreOffice document by holding the Ctrl and Shift keys and pressing u (Ctrl+Shift+u) and then typing the hexdecimal code (in this case) 2204 and pressing the space bar. But I agree, this type of logic symbol should certainly be included in the list of special characters in LibreOffice Math Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Math: There is no
2011/5/4 Robert Derman robert.der...@pressenter.com Olivier Hallot wrote: Em 04-05-2011 13:11, M Henri Day escreveu: 2011/5/4 Olivier Hallotolivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org Thanks Mike for the tip As I see, this character U+2204, does not exist in Opensymbol font, used by Math by default. At least not in the displayed characters of Math UI. So, if this symbol get implemented in Opensymbol, it will be trivial to make it show in the Element window Olivier Olivier, in Linux operating systems such as, e g, Ubuntu, symbols like the ∄ symbol can easily be inserted in a LibreOffice document by holding the Ctrl and Shift keys and pressing u (Ctrl+Shift+u) and then typing the hexdecimal code (in this case) 2204 and pressing the space bar. But I agree, this type of logic symbol should certainly be included in the list of special characters in LibreOffice Math Henri Hi Yes, in a Mandriva system as well, although I run out of fingers to type such key combination!! Does not work in Windows... Since the majority of computer users have the Windows OS, it sounds like we need to specifically add this character to the set of Math characters. As I noted above, I quite agree that these logical symbols should be added to the list of special characters in LibreOffice Math. However, until they are, there exists a workaround for Windows users, which even works with Windows 7 (checked on 64-bit Win7 Pro) ; namely, to install UnicodeInput ( http://www.fileformat.info/tool/unicodeinput/index.htm). Note, however, that (for me at least), it is not the hex code, but rather the decimal code that must be used to import the glyph ; thus entering «2204» (without the quotation marks) in the tool gives me the desired ∄, whereas entering «089c»gives me a glyph I cannot read ࢜ with the fonts I have installed on Win7 Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Math: There is no
2011/5/4 Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:19 PM, M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/5/4 Robert Derman robert.der...@pressenter.com [...] (for me at least), it is not the hex code, but rather the decimal code that must be used to import the glyph ; thus entering «2204» (without the quotation marks) in the tool gives me the desired ∄, whereas entering «089c»gives me a glyph I cannot read ࢜ with the fonts I have installed on Nope - that's double conversion you're doing here.. 2204 is already hex value. that in decimal would be 8708 While probably not so useful for this case, you can also modify windows keyboard layouts to have access to more key-combinations. http://microsoft.com/globaldev/tools/msklc.mspx ciao Christian I'm not quite sure I follow you here, Christian ; 089c is the hexadecimal representation of the number represented by the decimal 2204 ((12x16⁰ + (9x16¹) + (8x16²)), so I don't understand where the «double conversion» comes in. As I understand it, 2204 is the decimal and 089c the hexadecimal code for the glyph «∄», and the first page of Table de caractères Unicode ( http://unicode.coeurlumiere.com/) would seem to back me up. But perhaps this is a misunderstanding on my part, and if so, I should be grateful if you would disabuse me Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice Math: There is no
2011/5/4 Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:06 PM, M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/5/4 Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com [...] I'm not quite sure I follow you here, Christian ; 089c is the hexadecimal representation of the number represented by the decimal 2204 Yes, but the 2204 is not a decimal number. 2204 is already a hexadecimal representation. [...] so I don't understand where the «double conversion» comes in. Your converting a number to hexadecimal that is already hexadecimal. It is not two thousand two hundred and four, but 2*16³+2*16²+4 = 8708 As I understand it, 2204 is the decimal and 089c the hexadecimal code for the glyph «∄», No. 2204 is the hexadecimal representation, and 089c is a completely different character (one that is not assigned) and the first page of Table de caractères Unicode ( http://unicode.coeurlumiere.com/) would seem to back me up. No, on the contrary, when you look up 089c there (go to 0890 in the leftmost row, then go to the c = 12th column (starting to count with 0, i.e. the columns with characters are 0890, 0891, … 0899, 089A, 089B, 089C (=2204), 089D, 089E, 089F Nowhere in the table's body, you'll see a hex digit, none of the small numbers above the characters contains an a, b, c, d, e or f, while the outer numbering does - thus those little number cannot be hexadecimal, but those are the decimal ones, they are increased by one left to right, top to bottom. go to http://unicode.coeurlumiere.com/?n=8192 locate the 2200 in the leftmost index column, go to the 4th (again starting with 0) column and you are at our character U+2204, with decimal number 8708. But perhaps this is a misunderstanding on my part, and if so, I should be grateful if you would disabuse me Hope that helps. ciao Christian Thanks, Christian ; I stand corrected Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Competition in the EU regarding pre-installed Windows
2011/4/22 Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com FFII and the AFUL (two free-software associations) have started a crowd-sourcing effort to provide information to the European Commission Competition agency about the lack of choice for the consumers when it comes to computers and compulsory pre-installed Windows. Original press-releases: http://press.ffii.org/Press%20releases/Share%20your%20operating%20system%20bundling%20tales%20with%20the%20EU http://aful.org/communiques/share-your-operating-system-bundling-tales-with-the-eu Here is my take to simplify the message, http://simos.info/blog/archives/1198 How is this relevant to LibreOffice? The source of the problem is the bundling of Microsoft Windows to the new computers. The manufacturers get discounts for the licenses if they support only Windows, if they promote only Windows on their websites and ads, and so on. If this relationship weakens, we may see a chance for LibreOffice on new computers, or Linux computers that obviously have LibreOffice. tl;dr: Visit http://ec.europa.eu/competition/forms/consumer_form_en.html to report cases where you could not buy a computer without Windows, while you had not need for Windows. Simos «If this relationship weakens, we may see a chance for LibreOffice on new computers, or Linux computers that obviously have LibreOffice.» 'tis a consummation. Devoutly to be wished. But somehow I find it difficult to envisage either Joaquín Almunia eller Alexander Italianer going that far Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Competition in the EU regarding pre-installed Windows
2011/4/22 Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:03 PM, M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/22 Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com FFII and the AFUL (two free-software associations) have started a crowd-sourcing effort to provide information to the European Commission Competition agency about the lack of choice for the consumers when it comes to computers and compulsory pre-installed Windows. Original press-releases: http://press.ffii.org/Press%20releases/Share%20your%20operating%20system%20bundling%20tales%20with%20the%20EU http://aful.org/communiques/share-your-operating-system-bundling-tales-with-the-eu Here is my take to simplify the message, http://simos.info/blog/archives/1198 How is this relevant to LibreOffice? The source of the problem is the bundling of Microsoft Windows to the new computers. The manufacturers get discounts for the licenses if they support only Windows, if they promote only Windows on their websites and ads, and so on. If this relationship weakens, we may see a chance for LibreOffice on new computers, or Linux computers that obviously have LibreOffice. tl;dr: Visit http://ec.europa.eu/competition/forms/consumer_form_en.html to report cases where you could not buy a computer without Windows, while you had not need for Windows. Simos «If this relationship weakens, we may see a chance for LibreOffice on new computers, or Linux computers that obviously have LibreOffice.» 'tis a consummation. Devoutly to be wished. But somehow I find it difficult to envisage either Joaquín Almunia eller Alexander Italianer going that far I do not understand the comment. What we do is report to the EU the cases we know, where we were forced to buy a computer with pre-installed Windows, although we did not need Windows (either we use Linux or we already had a Windows license). It's up to the Competition agency of the European Commission to take appropriate action. That's their job. Our job, and the initiative from the FFII and AFUL, is to report cases to the EC Competition agency. Simos Just pointing out, Simos, that I don't share what seems to be your confidence in the ability - or for that matter, the intention - of the Competition Agency to do what we both agree is its job Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Competition in the EU regarding pre-installed Windows
2011/4/22 Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:36 PM, M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/22 Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:03 PM, M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/22 Simos Xenitellis simos.li...@googlemail.com FFII and the AFUL (two free-software associations) have started a crowd-sourcing effort to provide information to the European Commission Competition agency about the lack of choice for the consumers when it comes to computers and compulsory pre-installed Windows. Original press-releases: http://press.ffii.org/Press%20releases/Share%20your%20operating%20system%20bundling%20tales%20with%20the%20EU http://aful.org/communiques/share-your-operating-system-bundling-tales-with-the-eu Here is my take to simplify the message, http://simos.info/blog/archives/1198 How is this relevant to LibreOffice? The source of the problem is the bundling of Microsoft Windows to the new computers. The manufacturers get discounts for the licenses if they support only Windows, if they promote only Windows on their websites and ads, and so on. If this relationship weakens, we may see a chance for LibreOffice on new computers, or Linux computers that obviously have LibreOffice. tl;dr: Visit http://ec.europa.eu/competition/forms/consumer_form_en.html to report cases where you could not buy a computer without Windows, while you had not need for Windows. Simos «If this relationship weakens, we may see a chance for LibreOffice on new computers, or Linux computers that obviously have LibreOffice.» 'tis a consummation. Devoutly to be wished. But somehow I find it difficult to envisage either Joaquín Almunia eller Alexander Italianer going that far I do not understand the comment. What we do is report to the EU the cases we know, where we were forced to buy a computer with pre-installed Windows, although we did not need Windows (either we use Linux or we already had a Windows license). It's up to the Competition agency of the European Commission to take appropriate action. That's their job. Our job, and the initiative from the FFII and AFUL, is to report cases to the EC Competition agency. Simos Just pointing out, Simos, that I don't share what seems to be your confidence in the ability - or for that matter, the intention - of the Competition Agency to do what we both agree is its job Well, you have to substantiate this claim, otherwise it appears that you are trying (unintentionally) to derail this discussion. We know that government agencies might be slow to react, but the way you are phrasing your view is that the Competition agency will simply not examine and discard any report. Simos «[D]erailing» strikes me as a bit harsh, Simos - and surely views as to the possible success of a suggested measure are relevant to this discussion ? Just what is that you suggest I substantiate - my lack of confidence in the ability or intentions of the EC Competition Agency (especially now that Neelie Kroes has been assigned other duties) ? Without personal knowledge of the commissioner and the agency head concerned - which, presumably, you lack as much as I - the only manner in which our differing views on the matter can be tested is by waiting to see whether, in fact, the Competition Agency does move to address the problem of the quasi monopoly held by Windows in desktop OSs. I very much hope that you are right and that I am wrong, but my experience with the EU Commission and the agencies it governs is that pessimism is usually warranted. In any event, just so that you know where I stand on this matter, I reproduce here a comment I published in the Reg on 20100106 : Here in Sweden, computer users who are not unusually computer savvy have no effective choice of operating system - in the event they haven't heard of Mac - none of the major electronic outlets selling computers to the general public ever mention that there are, in fact, alternatives to Windows OS. Smaller shops devoted to a more technically literate clientèle where one can purchase computers without an OS or have one installed according to one's needs do indeed exist, but generally speaking, users in this country are faced with a monopoly and are forced to pay the inevitable monopoly tax that accompanies one. It was heartening to see the European Commission take on Microsoft over the issue of bundling Internet Explorer with Windows OS, but it must be admitted that by the time the agreement with Microsoft forcing the company to make users aware that a choice of browser was indeed possible was reached, Firefox had already broken open the bundle. I'd very much like to see the European Commission require purveyors of computers in Europe to inform customers that a plethora of operating
Re: [tdf-discuss] Fwd: [users] Licensing Details
2011/4/21 James Wilde james.wi...@sunde-wilde.com Just got this message in my inbox. I wonder if sending him a note about LibO would be considered to be in breach of the comprehensive warning at the bottom. //James Begin forwarded message: From: SAEED AHMED saeed.ah...@3i-infotech.com Date: April 20, 2011 15:34:31 GMT+02:00 To: us...@openoffice.org us...@openoffice.org Subject: [users] Licensing Details Reply-To: us...@openoffice.org Hi, We are working and quoting for an upcoming a government opportunity, which intent to supply around 500 desktops. The suggested operating system would be Windows 7, and we would like to propose open office as an Office Suite for all the 500 desktops. Request to share the details on licensing in case of any. The Following components need to imply. 1. Full version and Perpetual use by client 2. Patches and Support till the product is supported by Openoffice.Org Looking forward to hear from you. Thanks and Regards, Syed Saeed Ahmed, Senior Manager - IT Services and eGovernance, 3i Infotech Ltd. Tel.Direct: + 91 22 39814534 | Mobile : + 91 9967014782 | Email: saeed.ah...@3i-infotech.com | www.3i-infotech.com * 3i Infotech wins the WorldBlu List of Most Democratic Workplaces 2010 Award * To file your Tax Returns just in minutes all you need is you Visit www.taxsmile.com India's Premier tax filing portal. This e-mail message may contain confidential,proprietary or legally privileged information. It should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have erroneously received this message, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. The recipient acknowledges that 3i Infotech or its subsidiaries and associated companies,(collectively 3i Infotech), are unable to exercise control or ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information contained in e-mail transmissions and further acknowledges that any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and no binding nature of the message shall be implied or assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due authority of 3i Infotech. Before opening any attachments please check them for viruses and defects. Well, James, as I read that last paragraph above, Mr Ahmed requests those who have «erroneously received» his posting to notify him in that event. Thus I presume you are within your rights to contact him whether or no your receipt of the posting can be considered erroneous. As the paragraph does not explicitly prohibit mentioning LibO in sucjh a notification, I also presume that you would be within your rights to do so. The above, of course, with the caveat that I am hardly an expert in Indian, Singaporean, Thai, Malaysian, or UK legal practices Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Fwd: [users] Licensing Details
2011/4/21 drew d...@baseanswers.com On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 19:05 +0200, M Henri Day wrote: 2011/4/21 James Wilde james.wi...@sunde-wilde.com Just got this message in my inbox. I wonder if sending him a note about LibO would be considered to be in breach of the comprehensive warning at the bottom. //James Begin forwarded message: From: SAEED AHMED saeed.ah...@3i-infotech.com Date: April 20, 2011 15:34:31 GMT+02:00 To: us...@openoffice.org us...@openoffice.org Subject: [users] Licensing Details Reply-To: us...@openoffice.org Hi, We are working and quoting for an upcoming a government opportunity, which intent to supply around 500 desktops. The suggested operating system would be Windows 7, and we would like to propose open office as an Office Suite for all the 500 desktops. Request to share the details on licensing in case of any. The Following components need to imply. 1. Full version and Perpetual use by client 2. Patches and Support till the product is supported by Openoffice.Org Looking forward to hear from you. Thanks and Regards, Syed Saeed Ahmed, Senior Manager - IT Services and eGovernance, 3i Infotech Ltd. Tel.Direct: + 91 22 39814534 | Mobile : + 91 9967014782 | Email: saeed.ah...@3i-infotech.com | www.3i-infotech.com * 3i Infotech wins the WorldBlu List of Most Democratic Workplaces 2010 Award * To file your Tax Returns just in minutes all you need is you Visit www.taxsmile.com India's Premier tax filing portal. This e-mail message may contain confidential,proprietary or legally privileged information. It should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have erroneously received this message, please delete it immediately and notify the sender. The recipient acknowledges that 3i Infotech or its subsidiaries and associated companies,(collectively 3i Infotech), are unable to exercise control or ensure or guarantee the integrity of/over the contents of the information contained in e-mail transmissions and further acknowledges that any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and no binding nature of the message shall be implied or assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due authority of 3i Infotech. Before opening any attachments please check them for viruses and defects. Well, James, as I read that last paragraph above, Mr Ahmed requests those who have «erroneously received» his posting to notify him in that event. Thus I presume you are within your rights to contact him whether or no your receipt of the posting can be considered erroneous. As the paragraph does not explicitly prohibit mentioning LibO in sucjh a notification, I also presume that you would be within your rights to do so. The above, of course, with the caveat that I am hardly an expert in Indian, Singaporean, Thai, Malaysian, or UK legal practices Henri That's all well and good - but - contacting him is simply _wrong_ IMO. He asked a question on the OpenOffice.org users list, not LibreOffice. To forward such a message here was wrong and such actions should NOT be tolerated. Sincerely, Drew Jensen «It is not best that we should all think alike; it is a *difference of opinion* that *makes horse races*.» Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Request for Libre Office on Spoon
2011/4/19 Blake Madden bl...@spoon.net Hello, I was referred to this mailing list by Florian Effenberger of The Document Foundation. My name is Blake and I work for a company called Spoon, which offers the ability to launch desktop apps from the web with no installs. We recently received a request to add LibreOffice to the Spoon.net app library. We'd like to partner with The Document Foundation to offer LibreOffice on Spoon. In the interest of transparency and public input, Florian suggested I submit my request to this mailing list for discussion. You can see examples of Spoon powered apps at http://spoon.net/apps . For free apps and trials, Spoon is a free service, and all that is needed for distribution is written permission. Feel free to shoot me an email if you have any questions. Thanks for your time. Sincerely, Blake Madden Account Manager Spoon Nothing for us Linux users ? Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: Live online testing of LibreOffice (WebLive) as: Re: [tdf-discuss] Request for Libre Office on Spoon
2011/4/20 Fabián Rodríguez magic...@member.fsf.org On 04/20/2011 05:13 AM, M Henri Day wrote: [...] Nothing for us Linux users ? Henri I believe this should work for any browser with Java support: http://www.edubuntu.org/weblive/app/lowriter Make sure you change the URL for the app name, and also make sure you specify Ubuntu or Edubuntu 11.04 from the possible choices. I haven't had time to test this BTW. Cheers, -- LibreOffice questions ? Des questions sur LibreOffice ? Preguntas acerca de LibreOffice ? Ask LibreOffice: http://libreoffice.shapado.com/ ~ Fabián Rodríguez http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:MagicFab Thanks for the link, Fabian ! I realise you haven't tested it yet, but get the impression that it only runs Writer ? Anyone here who has tested who might be able to say whether that impression is correct ?... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Feature Request: Capitalizing Letters:
2011/4/7 Steve Edmonds steve.edmo...@ptglobal.com On 2011-04-07 10:54, Steve Edmonds wrote: On 2011-04-07 10:02, Christoph Noack wrote: Hi Laurence! Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2011, 07:32 +1000 schrieb Laurence Jeloudev: can't there be a shortcut like in microsoft office for capitalisation? You can define a shortcut to execute the capitalization feature. Please go to Tools -- Customize... and the tab Keyboard. Then select an entry in Shortcut keys according to your wish (Strg+F3 is already used for AutoText, but you may change that). Then, chose the desired feature - in your case it might be Category=Format, and Function=Capitalize Every Word (or: Rotate case). Does this help? Cheers, Christoph Thanks, helped me - I just had a cause to lowercase 2 letters in the middle of a list of uppercase words. Made it much easier with a shortcut. In fact it is even better to asign my own shortcut. For best efficiency I like to keep one hand on the mouse and one on the keyboard (highlight-shortcut) and hence I want one handed shortcuts. SHIFT+F is no good, CTRL+SHIFT+L or CTRL+SHIFT+U works for me. When assigning, keyboard shortcuts, Ubuntu and other Linux users might want to note that «Ctrl + Shift + u» provides access to Unicode hexadecimals Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Get and appove: recommended Soundfile pronouncing LibreOffice
2011/4/1 dionysien jean-francois.bour...@univ-paris8.fr Hi all We must keep in mind that languages vary enormously with respect non only to their available vowels and consonants, but also to their possible syllables. The component words of LibreOffice, though quite common international words, have already diverging pronounciations wordwide. We already know that in Japanese a vowel will HAVE to be inserted between B and R, and probably also at the end, just because the syllabic pattern of Japanese commands it. And that is right so, even if the phonetic [libureofisu] differs from [librofis] Some will need the of Libre, à la Spanish, others won't, à la French, others will pronounce a double , à la Italian, others, lacking a [o] vowel, will put a [u] to pronounce the ... No single recommendation is necessary or even usable. We must also remember that in the language used in this forum, the very name of vowels is mostly a... diphtong Let every language community decide for the most suitable pronunciation, according to their possibilities and wishes. That diversity just reflects the richness of word cultures. We can share a common LibreOffice and call it in our mother tongue. Cheers Jean-François Agree, Jean François ; moreover, not only does the syllabic pattern of Japanese necessitate the insertion of a vowel or vowels in consonant clusters, but the same imperative holds true to an even greater degree in (standard) Chinese. Thus it is inevitable that the term «LibreOffice» will be pronounced differently from land to land, language to language, dialect to dialect. As the same time, the concerns of posters who wonder how it can be pronounced in their respective languages should not be ignored. Why not post mp3 files with pronunciations by tdf developers from various countries which could help in the construction of standards for the many languages in which, hopefully, LibreOffice will employed. Friedrich's German-lnguage version is a good example Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Get and appove: recommended Soundfile pronouncing LibreOffice
2011/4/1 Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:26 PM, M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/1 dionysien jean-francois.bour...@univ-paris8.fr Hi all We must keep in mind that languages vary enormously with respect non only to their available vowels and consonants, but also to their possible syllables. The component words of LibreOffice, though quite common international words, have already diverging pronounciations wordwide. We already know that in Japanese a vowel will HAVE to be inserted between B and R, and probably also at the end, just because the syllabic pattern of Japanese commands it. And that is right so, even if the phonetic [libureofisu] differs from [librofis] Sure, but that doesn't mean you explicitly voice those vowels. (and of course that doesn't mean you cannot pronounce it differently to what you write) A machine saying libreoffice mimicing the intended french/english: http://tts.imtranslator.net/FKTh Agree, Jean François ; moreover, not only does the syllabic pattern of Japanese necessitate the insertion of a vowel or vowels in consonant clusters, but the same imperative holds true to an even greater degree in (standard) Chinese. Thus it is inevitable that the term «LibreOffice» will be pronounced differently from land to land, language to language, dialect to dialect. Sure, but if people want some guidelines (or better hints on what the intended sounding ist), why not provide them with one? If you say libre as in the french word libre = free and the english office then people might be as smart as before, as they don't necessarily have a clue on how french is pronunced, etc. Esp. for Japanese using foreign words in japanalized pronounciation is nothing new.. As the same time, the concerns of posters who wonder how it can be pronounced in their respective languages should not be ignored. Why not post mp3 files with pronunciations by tdf developers from various countries which could help in the construction of standards for the many languages in which, hopefully, LibreOffice will employed. Friedrich's German-lnguage version is a good example nitpickOh, it is not German language :-) it is the french/english version spoken by a German/nitpick Thanks for your nitpicking, Christian ; were I to return the favour I should point out that Friedrich's file was an example of a German-language pronunciation of a French word followed by an English one. In any event, as I hope I made clear in my previous posting, I feel that more of the same (*mutatis mutandi*, of course) would be helpful to those in doubt as to how to the term might be pronounced in their respective languages *Gruß* Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: How to pronounce the name (again, sorry)
2011/3/30 Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com On 3/29/11 10:10 PM, Sveinn í Felli wrote: Well, 'Libre' is also spanish - but with quite different pronounciation ('b' approaches 'v'). 'Libre' is also italian - but then it means a book, I think. Book in Italian is libro. Anyway, I think that the English pronunciation of libre (as in FLOSS, free libre open source software) - although slightly different from the French and the Spanish pronunciation - is to be considered the reference for every language. What, pray, is «the English pronunciation of libre» ? If the first vowel is to be pronounced as «aɪ» as in, say, «live», it differs vastly from the customary pronunciation in almost all European languages - Germanic as well as Romance - which is much closer to «iː», and can hardly serve as «the reference for every language» Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: How to pronounce the name (again, sorry)
2011/3/30 Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com I am not a native English speaker, but I think that liberty - which has the same root of libre - is not pronounced as laiberty. I have heard many native English speakers pronounce libre, and they all pronounce it the same way. Italo, you may have missed the first post in this thread, but there the OP (Samphan Raruenrom) posted a Google Translate version ( http://translate.google.com/#fr|en|LibreOffice) in which the initial vowel is, in fact, pronounced as «aɪ». If the native English speakers you have heard pronounce it as «i» or «iː», then I think this, unlike the Google Translate version, could serve as the basis for an international pronunciation, which in any event will inevitably vary from language to language (and idiolect to idiolect) Henri On 3/30/11 8:37 AM, M Henri Day wrote: What, pray, is «the English pronunciation of libre» ? If the first vowel is to be pronounced as «aɪ» as in, say, «live», it differs vastly from the customary pronunciation in almost all European languages - Germanic as well as Romance - which is much closer to «iː», and can hardly serve as «the reference for every language» -- Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com mobile +39.348.5653829 VoIP +39.02.320621813 skype italovignoli -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- *老朽 頓首 M Henri Day, PhD, MD Stadshagsvägen 22, 5tr S-112 50 Stockholm SUÈDE Tel : +46 8 6183098 Email : mhenri...@gmail.com Skype/Google Talk : mhenriday http://mhenriday.googlepages.com http://mhenriday.blogspot.com/ http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/mhenriday/* -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] How to pronounce the name (again, sorry)
2011/3/29 Prabath Galagamage gprab...@gmail.com I think Friedrich Strohmaier's comments is correct. In the native languages can not write the name of LibreOffice by English letters. It is one of reason for lack of development of native languages. One or more official pronunciation suggestions are there, it is better for our local activities and it is helpful for make a unique name to LibreOffice around the world. Prabath, please note that the letters in question were devised and used for centuries before anything that could be called the English language existed and, in different variations, are used at present to represent the sounds of many languages other than English. The alphabet comprising these is best known as the Latin or Roman alphabet Henri On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Friedrich Strohmaier damokles4-lis...@bits-fritz.de wrote: Hi sophie, *, sophie schrieb: On 28/03/2011 17:32, Jon Hamkins wrote: In the U.S., it is also unclear how to pronounce LibreOffice. Those of us showing up to man the booth at SCaLE came with slightly different assumptions on pronunciation. Do we need an official position from TDF, perhaps a localized one, or is it OK for everyone to say it how they want? Pronounce it as you feel it, it's the best for an open source project :) Sorry, I strongly disagree. Which I disagree is to leave people alone while asking for help. You are in the position of not having any issues pronouncing, because You were one of the minds choosing the name, which of course fits the people doing so. There is nothing wrong with that. But we should not let people beeing on their own, facing those issues for two reasons: - we never should leave alone anyone searching help - I'd think it's a nice thing to understand each other when we meet live at any place and speak of the subject of our hearts :o)). This is no proposal for a single official pronunciation written in stone, but rather one for an agreement for better understanding. Gruß/regards -- Friedrich Libreoffice-Box http://libreofficebox.org/ LibreOffice and more on CD/DVD images -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Prabath Galagamage http://textlk.blogspot.com/ http://agniezine.wordpress.com/ http://www.ejsa.info -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- *老朽 頓首 M Henri Day, PhD, MD Stadshagsvägen 22, 5tr S-112 50 Stockholm SUÈDE Tel : +46 8 6183098 Email : mhenri...@gmail.com Skype/Google Talk : mhenriday http://mhenriday.googlepages.com http://mhenriday.blogspot.com/ http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/mhenriday/* -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] How to pronounce the name (again, sorry)
2011/3/27 Stefan Weigel stefan.wei...@bildungskreis.org Hi, Am 27.03.2011 08:22, schrieb Samphan Raruenrom: I found this page http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/faq/general-faq/how-do-you-pronounce-libreoffice/ that link to Google translate to provide the (official?) pronouncement. I don´t think, that this is official in sense of approved by TDF or the TDF community. http://translate.google.com/#fr|en|LibreOffice This sounds odd to me, personally. The following sounds almost like the one I am used to: http://translate.google.com/#fr|en|LiebreOffice I'm quite surprised with it. I thought it is ˈlɪbə as in liberty orlbr as in http://www.thefreedictionary.com/vers+libre So actually it is ˈliːbreɪ as in http://es.thefreedictionary.com/libre , right? Yes, I would agree. It would be nice if someone could provide an official pronouncement sound file on the LibreOffice website (and phonetic, for the literate). I am not sure, if there is really a need for an official pronunciation. This is a free project. Every participant is free to pronounce it the way she/he likes. For me, there is nothing wrong with different pronunciation by people with different native tongue. IMO, http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/faq/general-faq/how-do-you-pronounce-libreoffice/ should be changed, in order to express that ther is no wrong or right. :-) Stefan I'm with Stefan here ; pronunciation of the term «LibreOffice» should be left to usage in the countries/regions concerned. I find the one suggested (?) by Google Translate directly distasteful ; why should the great vowel shift which occured in English from the late fifteenth century onwards be imposed on all the countries which use variants of the Roman alphabet ? Freedom to pronounce the term as suits us best ; isn't that an integral part of LIBREOffice ?... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] How to pronounce the name (again, sorry)
2011/3/27 sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com Hi Prabath, On 27/03/2011 19:17, Prabath Galagamage wrote: In the Sri Lanka and Sinhala language we have problem with correct pronunciation. There is no correct pronunciation, we can not write name of LIbreOffice by Sinhala language. Please insert correct pronunciation audio to TDF web site. there is one on the wiki done by Cedric Bosdonnat with the French pronunciation , but I can't find it at the moment, anybody knows where it is? I've added Cédric on CC, he will be able to tell us tomorrow anyway. Kind regards Sophie Sophie, I think this is the link to which you refer : * http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr/wordpress/?p=722* . It links to a French pronunciation of *libre* and an English pronunciation of *office*, which should do the trick. Cédric's wise words about minor differences in pronunciation not constituting a problem (which product names are pronounced identically throughout the world ?) are worth taking *ad notam* !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Euro symbol not inserted into write documents
2011/3/25 Tinkerer j_taylo...@btinternet.com Hi Mark I am in the UK too. Perhaps I should have mentioned, I am using an iMac System 10.6.6 Shift 3 = £ Shift 4 = $ Alt2 = € The € is universal now and you should not need to use things like macro's Tink. On the standard 105-key Scandinavian keyboard, the symbol «€» is most easily typed via «Alt Gr + e». Doesn't this procedure work on English-language keyboards ?... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] [OT] Japan Earthquake
2011/3/12 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net To all the LibreOffice/TDF users/contributors in Japan areas affected by the earthquake, I wish you, your families, and friends well. Gary 私の最も深い同情を表明させて頂きます Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] hi !
2011/3/6 csol...@gmail.com csol...@gmail.com Hi,what is up? my friend that works at chinese electronic corporation called VIP-SHIMAO tell me: their company is carrying out a promotion activity, there are phone,notebook,LCD TV and so on,not only all of goods are new and original ,but also the price so cheaper,they have received from customers high praise in the worldwide, today i get the digital camera that ordered,their service team are so excelent,shiping time take less than one week,i am very satisfied with their goods and service. now i share with you the good news,i believe that you can find what you need or like there : www.vip-shimao.info i trust that you will not despair and will get surprising,wish shopping happily!! Wish shopping happily to you, too - but I do hope that a post like the above will *not* be archived for eternity and that, indeed, the poster will be removed from this list !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs
2011/2/27 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Hi, RGB ES wrote on 2011-02-26 14.58: I get a certification error with konqueror, but not with firefox for https://www.libreoffice.org/. Same forhttps://bugs.freedesktop.org/ might be because Konqueror does not know about the StartSSL Root CA which we use - it should work at least in Firefox, IE, Chrome, SeaMonkey and Safari. :-) Florian Interesting ! I checked this out in FF, Chromium, and Opera and at first glance everything looked fine. However, that latest Opera contains a feature that allows one to check security information with respect to a website, and under the «Security» tab, I see the following (my translation from the Swedish) : * This web site is not secure.* The connexion to www.libreoffice.org is not secure and should not be used to transmit sensitive information. The server attempted to activate security functions but failed. The above notice is followed by a so-called «certificate summary», as follows : Owner : *.libreoffice.org, Florian Effenberger Issuer : StartCom Class2 Primary Intermediate Server, CA StartCom Ltd. Expires : 2012-12-27 01.37.00 GMT Encryption protocol : TLS v1.0 256 bit AES (1024 bit DHE_RSA/SHA) Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs
2011/2/27 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Hi, M Henri Day wrote on 2011-02-27 16.10: Interesting ! I checked this out in FF, Chromium, and Opera and at first glance everything looked fine. However, that latest Opera contains a feature that allows one to check security information with respect to a website, and under the «Security» tab, I see the following (my translation from the Swedish) : * This web site is not secure.* The connexion to www.libreoffice.org is not secure and should not be used to transmit sensitive information. The server attempted to activate security functions but failed. do you see the same message if you open https://www.libreoffice.org/admin/? Thanks, Florian No, Florian, when I type that sequence into the address bar, I'm redirected to «https://www.libreoffice.org/Security/login?BackURL=%2Fadmin%2F» and a padlock symbol is shown to the left. When I click on the latter, I'm informed both that the connexion is secure and that the website has an «impeccable» security history - a description I much appreciated. In order to log onto the above page, I was instructed to «[p]lease choose an authentication method and enter your credentials to access the CMS» ; when I then attempted to do so using my email address and my registration password for the LibreOffice forum, I was rejected, which is, I presume, precisely as it should be, given that I am not an LO adminstrator Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs
2011/2/27 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote: ... Interesting ! I checked this out in FF, Chromium, and Opera and at first glance everything looked fine. However, that latest Opera contains a feature that allows one to check security information with respect to a website, and under the «Security» tab, I see the following (my translation from the Swedish) : * This web site is not secure.* The connexion to www.libreoffice.org is not secure and should not be used to transmit sensitive information. The server attempted to activate security functions but failed. The above notice is followed by a so-called «certificate summary», as follows : Owner : *.libreoffice.org, Florian Effenberger Issuer : StartCom Class2 Primary Intermediate Server, CA StartCom Ltd. Expires : 2012-12-27 01.37.00 GMT Encryption protocol : TLS v1.0 256 bit AES (1024 bit DHE_RSA/SHA) Henri That's OK as it is pulling the images from an http vs http: http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-12.png In other words, its mixed only 'partially' secure. Not quite sure what you mean by «pulling the images from an http vs http» here, Gary, as the address for which the anomalous security ratings is shown is, in fact, «https://www.libreoffice.org/», i e, a https address. In any event, I still get the above messages for «https://www.libreoffice.org/» on Opera If you try https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ that page should show the security lock. And if you check the security (Tools|Advanced|Page Security Info) you should see: The connection to www.libreoffice.org is secure. Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01 That was indeed the case on Opera 11.01 on my 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10 setup The issue, at this point, is with SeaMonkey (linux) Konquer. If I try on SeaMonkey Windows 2.1b2 it's fine: http://img402.imageshack.us/f/seamonkeycertwindows1.png/ I've posted on the SeaMonkey dev group to see I someone there can figure out the issue. Gary -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** Archived for eternity ! Not bad - I'd settle for half of that ! Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] [Solved] Re: Ping Florian - StartCom Certs
2011/2/27 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net On 02/27/2011 11:52 AM, M Henri Day wrote: 2011/2/27 NoOp snipped On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote: ... That's OK as it is pulling the images from an http vs http: http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-12.png In other words, its mixed only 'partially' secure. Not quite sure what you mean by «pulling the images from an http vs http» here, Gary, as the address for which the anomalous security ratings is shown is, in fact, «https://www.libreoffice.org/», i e, a https address. In any event, I still get the above messages for «https://www.libreoffice.org/» on Opera What that means is that the rotating images that you see on the page showing LO screenshots are obtained from http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/. That's a non-encrypted link so Opera is telling you that there are unencrypted objects on the page therefore isn't completely secure. In other browsers (Firefox for instance) you will see a 'broken lock' on that page to indicate that it has mixed objects (unencrypted/encrypted). Gary, I can't access the http://www.libreoffice.org/http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/ assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/page ; when I try I'm informed that I don't have the requisite permissions. However, precisely as you said - which, of course, I should have noted previously - in Firefox, when I access the http://www.libreoffice.org/http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/page, a note to the effect that the website has not provided any information on the owner is displayed and in addition, under technical details, a message to the effect that the website is partially encrypted and that certain portions of the page were not encrypted before being sent over the internet Henri If you try https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ that page should show the security lock. And if you check the security (Tools|Advanced|Page Security Info) you should see: The connection to www.libreoffice.org is secure. Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01 That was indeed the case on Opera 11.01 on my 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10 setup The issue, at this point, is with SeaMonkey (linux) Konquer. If I try on SeaMonkey Windows 2.1b2 it's fine: http://img402.imageshack.us/f/seamonkeycertwindows1.png/ I've posted on the SeaMonkey dev group to see I someone there can figure out the issue. Looks like a SeaMonkey profile issue. Just tried on a different machine the regular profile gets the errors. Switched to a clean 'test' profile and https://www.libreoffice.org/download works fine (linux). Now I just have to find the correct mozilla sqlite file that apparently is still stuck on *.documentfoundation.org and not picking up *.libreoffice.org. Apologies for for the false alarm noise. Gary ... -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- *老朽 頓首 M Henri Day, PhD, MD Stadshagsvägen 22, 5tr S-112 50 Stockholm SUÈDE Tel : +46 8 6183098 Email : mhenri...@gmail.com Skype/Google Talk : mhenriday http://mhenriday.googlepages.com http://mhenriday.blogspot.com/ http://www.stumbleupon.com/stumbler/mhenriday/* -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Unable to use SCIM to import CJK languages into LibreOffice on 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10
2011/2/21 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net On 02/20/2011 07:39 AM, M Henri Day wrote: I recently had occasion to reinstall 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10 (n b, not because of a problem in Ubuntu itself, but because I replaced Windows Vista with Windows 7 on the Windows side of this dual-boot machine and thereafter failed in my attempts to restore GRUB2) and after doing so, noticed that no matter what I tried, I was unable to get SCIM to import CJK languages into a Writer text. Same problem, of course, when using OOo ; I'm using the latest (Swedish) 3.3 version in both cases. SCIM works fine with other applications on Ubuntu, like the gedit text editor or Gmail's compose. In contrast to the situation on Ubuntu, I have no problem using the Microsoft IMEs to import these languages into LO or OOo texts. However, I don't want to be forced to run Windows 7 in order to write, e g, a Chinese or Japanese text in a LO or OOo document. Is it possible to get SCIM and LO to play nice with each other and in that event, does anyone have any suggestions as to how to go about doing so ?... Henri Perhaps try iBus instead? https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ibus NoOp, thanks for your suggestion. Alas, I found myself unable to get IBus to work ; for example, after installing IBus according to the instructions on the Ubuntu Community page and adding Chinese and Japan, I didn't find «IBus Preferences» under «System» → «Preferences», nor did «Ctrl + Space» start IBus in, e g, LibreOffice, despite my having selected «ibus» as my keyboard input method under «System» → «Administration» → «Language Support». So I'm still trying to get SCIM to work. The thing that surprised me with respect to Christian's advice above to set SCIM as my «global default» was that I thought I had already done so ; i e, I had edited my profile under /etc by adding the following : # SCIM export XMODIFIERS='@im=SCIM' export GTK_IM_MODULE=scim export XIM_PROGRAM=scim -d export QT_IM_MODULE=scim scim -d I had also ensured that the following lines appeared in /etc/scim/global : /SupportedUnicodeLocales = sv_SE.utf8,en_US.UTF-8. Previously, these measures have sufficed to make SCIM work with OOo/LO What next ?... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Unable to use SCIM to import CJK languages into LibreOffice on 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10
I recently had occasion to reinstall 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10 (n b, not because of a problem in Ubuntu itself, but because I replaced Windows Vista with Windows 7 on the Windows side of this dual-boot machine and thereafter failed in my attempts to restore GRUB2) and after doing so, noticed that no matter what I tried, I was unable to get SCIM to import CJK languages into a Writer text. Same problem, of course, when using OOo ; I'm using the latest (Swedish) 3.3 version in both cases. SCIM works fine with other applications on Ubuntu, like the gedit text editor or Gmail's compose. In contrast to the situation on Ubuntu, I have no problem using the Microsoft IMEs to import these languages into LO or OOo texts. However, I don't want to be forced to run Windows 7 in order to write, e g, a Chinese or Japanese text in a LO or OOo document. Is it possible to get SCIM and LO to play nice with each other and in that event, does anyone have any suggestions as to how to go about doing so ?... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Unable to use SCIM to import CJK languages into LibreOffice on 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10
2011/2/20 Christian Lohmaier lohmaier+ooofut...@googlemail.com Hi Henri, *, On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:39 PM, M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com wrote: Same problem, of course, when using OOo ; I'm using the latest (Swedish) 3.3 version in both cases. SCIM works fine with other applications on Ubuntu, like the gedit text editor or Gmail's compose. As OOo/LO doesn't support GTK's input method switching on the fly (you cannot choose between the different input methods by opening the context-menu), you need to enable scim before launching OOo/LO - either by setting it as your global default (i.e. default not GTK input method, but scim), or by setting GTK_IM_MODULE=scim just for OOo/LO Either add it to the soffice startup script, or launch it manually from the commandline. (GTK_IM_MODULE=scim soffice) Note that it has to be completely shut down, otherwise it will just reuse an existing session and not apply the change. ciao Christian That was fast, Christian - many thanks ! I chose to launch the start up script from the command line and it worked perfectly - the command opened OOo (3.2) and a test showed that SCIM functioned just as it should. Well and good ! But alas, as always seems to be the case with me, the situation is more complicated. At the moment I have no less than two (2) versions of OOo and one (1) version of LibreOffice installed on my machine - i e, the Ubuntuised version of OOo that came with the 10.10 OS, *viz*, 1:3.2.1-7ubuntu1.1 and the OOo 3.3 RC (3.3.0-20) and LibreOffice 3.3 (3.3.0-19) packages which I myself installed. Writer in the former is launched via the command «ooffice -writer %F», the two latter packages are launched via «/opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice» and «/opt/libreoffice/program/soffice», respectively. Not surprisingly, after performing the command «GTK_IM_MODULE=scim soffice», SCIM now works with the first named, but not with the latter two. My knowledge of Ubuntu hasn't sufficed to permit me to set SCIM as my global default, which I think would be the best solution or, failing that, to insert the «GTK_IM_MODULE=scim» in the soffice startup scripts for both LibreOffice and OpenOffice. Can I prevail upon you to further help me by explaining how to perform these operations ?... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] No more desktop Linux systems in the German Foreign Office - The H Open Source: News and Features
2011/2/18 Gordon Burgess-Parker gbpli...@gmail.com On 18/02/11 06:16, Samphan Raruenrom wrote: They're moving back from Linux to Windows+Office! What's happening there? Apparently it was all to do (!) with printer and scanner driversmethinks there has been some MS shenanigans here... I suspect that Herr Westerwelle has been borged Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Extensions for LibreOffice
2011/2/12 Robert Holtzman hol...@cox.net On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:46:02PM +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Christophe Strobbe schrieb: I hope they are, but[...] Hi, I see several problems: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33265 Has anyone gotten an untrusted site warning for this link? FF says the certificate has expired. -- Bob Holtzman Key ID: 8D549279 If you think you're getting free lunch, check the price of the beer Bob, when I checked the link in FF 3.6.15pre on 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10, I saw the following : «(Felkod: sec_error_unknown_issuer)». I get the same type of warning in Chromium (11.0.669.0 (74721)). Agree that someone from tdf should check this out !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Computer Magazine cover CDs
2011/2/9 Alexander Thurgood alex.thurg...@gmail.com Le 09/02/11 09:38, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit : Hi Jonathan, I have the perfect magazine that might be willing to put LO as part of their CD on their magazine. it is linuxformat.co.uk is their website :) I thought (and I may be completely wrong here) they'd already done a review when 3.3.0 final was released, and kind of said something akin to Yes, hmm, good, but not good enough Alex Did a search for LibreOffice on the *Linux Format* website, but with no results Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] 恭禧發財
2011/2/4 Harold Fuchs hwfa.libreoff...@gmail.com M Henri Day mhenri...@gmail.com wrote in message news:AANLkTimLyyZmZzWk=92TYCnfm=oahfko12zp38ak0...@mail.gmail.com... ... *祝 新春快乐 ! *Henri (*戴安理*) whoat are you talking about?:-) I regret having offended your sensibilities, Pier Andreit ; I simply took my cue from Drew. Hope that you have not suffered permanent damage from being confronted with a script you do not understand !... Henri (戴安理) Henri, Google translator translates your 戴安理 as Diane Li. Why, please? I have *no* Chinese of any description (Mandarin, Cantonese, ...) whatsoever so, if it's a pun or similar, please explain. Oh, and to James Wilde, thank you very much for Google translator; wonderful! -- Harold Fuchs London, England Harold,as I explained in another posting on this somewhat confused thread, «戴安理» is just my name in Chinese script. Alas, I seem to have contributed to a large degree to the confusion ! But it's been fun !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] 恭禧發財
2011/2/4 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net On 02/04/2011 12:18 AM, M Henri Day wrote: 2011/2/4 Harold Fuchs hwfa.libreoff...@gmail.com ... Google translator translates your 戴安理 as Diane Li. Why, please? I have *no* Chinese of any description (Mandarin, Cantonese, ...) whatsoever so, if it's a pun or similar, please explain. Oh, and to James Wilde, thank you very much for Google translator; wonderful! -- Harold Fuchs London, England Harold,as I explained in another posting on this somewhat confused thread, «戴安理» is just my name in Chinese script. ... Henri, you left out the 'M'. NoOp, so can it go : Chinese names tend to be short and lapidary, like the classical language Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] 恭禧發財
2011/2/3 drew d...@baseanswers.com The year of the Rabbit is upon us, So go do what rabbit's do! Which is . tell all their friends about LibreOffice! 长寿 Drew *祝 新春快乐 ! *Henri (*戴安理*) -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] 恭禧發財
2011/2/3 yahoo-pier_andreit pier_andr...@yahoo.it Il 03/02/2011 16:10, M Henri Day ha scritto: 2011/2/3 drew d...@baseanswers.com The year of the Rabbit is upon us, So go do what rabbit's do! Which is . tell all their friends about LibreOffice! 长寿 Drew *祝 新春快乐 ! *Henri (*戴安理*) whoat are you talking about?:-) I regret having offended your sensibilities, Pier Andreit ; I simply took my cue from Drew. Hope that you have not suffered permanent damage from being confronted with a script you do not understand !... Henri (戴安理) -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] 恭禧發財
2011/2/3 yahoo-pier_andreit pier_andr...@yahoo.it snip :-))) 'ntepreoccupa' nun s'offennemo, e mica c'ho o so si mo http://translate.google.com/# te po da 'na mano :- L'unica cosa che mi preoccupo è che non so identificare il dialetto Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice docs for Ubuntu
2011/1/30 Fabián Rodríguez magic...@member.fsf.org Hi I've consolidated the notes I had about LibreOffice and Ubuntu at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LibreOffice I've shared it with the Ubuntu community on identi.ca and I hope it will provide an easy resource to refer to. Any comments / suggestions are welcome - direct edits to the wiki are *most* welcome :) Cheers, Fabian -- Fabián Rodríguez http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:MagicFab Very useful, Fabian ! Thanks very much !... Henri -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-discuss] LibO - was New name
2010/10/5 James Wilde james.wi...@sunde-wilde.com On Oct 5, 2010, at 13:53 , Carlos Jose Lenarts Ramis wrote: I don't like the name LibreOffice but the I like acronym LibO. I'm neutral about LibreOffice, but I agree about LibO. And I can guarantee that it will go over big here in Sweden. We have all kinds of xxxO here, for example: JO justice ombudsman (an ombudsman is the citizens' representative in government) DO discrimination ombudsman JämOequality of the sexes ombudsman HomOequality of sexual orientation ombudsman and now LibOlibertarian ombudsman? Sorry, couldn't resist it. :) //James A rose by any other name - but if we get a Swedish language pack, it should indeed become popular Henri -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/