> CentOS 5 is EOL in March 2017. Even if work started NOW on v9/CentOS 6
> bearing in mind the gestation period for v8, would it get out the door
> by then ? And by which time CentOS 6 will be getting on with current EOL
> in Nov 2020 (gawd that seems a long time away!)
>
It all starts with settin
Hi Greg,
good to see you alive an kickin' ;-)
The MAS (Mitel Application Server) is in basic still e-smith/SME Server,
but extended with (proprietary and/or OS apps) to become a Unified
Communications and applications platform. Surely it will run CentOS 6.x by
now, and a modern grandson of SME Se
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Greg Zartman wrote:
>
>
> Biggest technical change (other then CentOS 6 base) is that FormMagick is
>> being gradually ripped out and replaced with new server-manager panels
>> based on Mojolicious::Lite.
>>
>>
> Someone finally came to their senses! :) :)
>
> For
> e-smith, as was, wrote FormMagick. Charlie and I both worked for e-smith.
> FormMagick was a big advance at the time, with some horrid parts. The world
> has moved on.
>
Hence my (our) respect to the e-smith team at the time. (Technical) design
cisions made then are still paying off today.
Some
> To give people an idea of host much better Mojolicious::Lite is to work
> with, here's one example, the shutdown/reboot panel. This is roughly 100
> lines of fairly sparse perl code, and 60 lines of HTML template. [There
> are comment blocks in the original file, but I think they just add bulk.
>
> No insult intended Gordon. I'm sure FormMagick did the trick for you guys
> in the day, but boy was it mystery to alot of us on the outside.
>
hence I remember so well :-)
___
Discussion about project organisation and overall direction
To unsubscribe,
> Its 'accept everything
> and bounce bad addresses later' policy forced me to drop SME as mail
> servers long ago. Maybe that was fixed eventually...
>
So we are able to harvest some possible development targets during the last
few days.
@Gordon, Agree with the focus on patching, testing, testi
Happy New year Shad
> These values are totally bogus. You can't pick dates out of the air
> without having any idea what is involved or how much labor force you have
> in place. Even then this sounds like something a sales guy or product
> manager would set and then try to hold a development te
> 'I have', he said smugly not that I'm necessarily any the wiser ;-)
>
ditto.
___
Discussion about project organisation and overall direction
To unsubscribe, e-mail discussion-unsubscr...@lists.contribs.org
Searchable archive at http://lists.contrib
> Because Shad is very busy, and also because he prefers instant messaging
> and Skype, and I choose not to use those media, it's hard to get his
> attention to discuss development processes via email. I strike while the
> iron is hot.
>
We are ALL busy, but DO follow Contribs.org community provid
> Let's take details off-line or into bugzilla
I assume the bugzilla route will be chosen in the spirit of 'community
effort', regardless of 1 personal preference in this WHOLE, 4000+ persons,
contribs.org community? IRC with archived logs would be a good
alternative, but that idea was killed a
> I'll give more money every month to the project sme, i'm waiting the
> beginning of this month.
>
Stephane do what you like to do, but next what you are already doing,
financial donations would be too much to expect/ask from you.
___
Discussion about p
Hi David,
your comments are what it make while.
Regards,
-HF
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:54 PM, David Ball wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> This is my first contribution to these mailing lists, inspired largely by
> John's document “The Future of SME Server”.
>
> As it is my first time here, a little about
Ian,
my best guess would be to create an extra forum e.g. Do you want to help?
'Development' etc wil scare people away.
Simply post tasks and from there take it to bugzilla, the entry level is
low and a broad audience.
There is a huge amount of lurkers on the forums and we can capitalize on
tha
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Ian Wells wrote:
>
>> Often a small task comes up
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Can someone reproduce Bug X?
>>
>> Bug Y is an easy fix, who wants it?
>>
>> Can someone with ABC please test this? Eg Windows Domain, or Win8, or
>> PPTP etc
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> W
* Mitel handed over the e-smith forums and documentation to the community
* At that time Jeff Coleman registered the domain name contribs.org and
received all assests from Mitel on behalf of the community
* I myself maintained contribs.org for several years, working with Jeff
* Jeff eventually tr
Correct, contribs.org at the time was the only 'organized entity' (as
per remark from Charlie below) to whom Mitel was able to 'hand over'
Currently contribs.org is 'still' registered to SME Server Inc
On 7-3-2014 17:07, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Fri, 7
I agree with the priority question and marketing approach.
-HF
On 8-3-2014 20:13, Jesper Knudsen wrote:
I think the first question, before the technology, is to ask what would we
use the data gathered for?
In my perspective, Smolt is not what we need. I do not think that we would
be any wiser
Hi Jonathan,
nice to see you back around.
The 'Test Internet Connection' in the console app 'phones home' with
data. Let's take a look at that.
I personally think that the data submitted should only contain:
a. Install date
b. Version
c. GeoIP location
d. Unique installer code
regarding d.
On 9-3-2014 21:05, Jonathan Martens wrote:
On 9-3-2014 20:47, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
nice to see you back around.
I have been around, although laying low and will be around and every
now and then chime in with my meaning, ideas etc. although I can not
dedicate the time I did
I hope Shad would be willing to speak up, for he is fully aware and
maintained all 'phone home' and install UUID, EPOCH stuff. Hopefully it
will prevent us from re-inventing the wheel.
On 10-3-2014 15:22, Jesper Knudsen wrote:
I agree that a unique ID would be beneficial in the long run and w
ReleaseVersion=8.1
SystemID=d0a6d2e7-f4be-4ebf-ae5a-7507775690ab
*From:*discussion-boun...@lists.contribs.org
[mailto:discussion-boun...@lists.contribs.org] *On Behalf Of
*Hsing-Foo Wang
*Sent:* 10. marts 2014 15:40
*To:* discussion@lists.contribs.org
*Subject:* Re: [discussion] Install
rt.pl
chmod +x SMEReport.pl
# Manual checkin
./SMEReport.pl -debug
mv SMEReport.pl /etc/cron.weekly
Regards,
Jesper
*From:*discussion-boun...@lists.contribs.org
[mailto:discussion-boun...@lists.contribs.org] *On Behalf Of
*Hsing-Foo Wang
*Sent:* 10. marts 2014 16:45
*To:* discussion@lists.contri
Just a word of humble appreciation to all of those involved in this effort.
-HF
On 27-3-2014 17:53, I Wells wrote:
Looking better today, all pass
http://wellsi.homeip.net/rnotes/robot/log.html
The solution I found from searching online was to install paramiko via yum
sudo pip uninstall pycr
Agree :-) It would be nice to embrace Jonathan still/again! And
hopefully others that would like to give it a try to get involved.
-HF
On 6-5-2014 20:43, stephane de Labrusse wrote:
++ :)
___
Discussion about project organisation and overall direc
I really hope someone will step up to the plate (or assist), with or
without a little funding from the Koozali Foundation.
-HF
On 01-06-14 19:41, Paul Pikowsky wrote:
Hello,
I belong to a Linux users group in Davis, California, LUGOD. They
have a website here:
http://www.lugod.org/
At e
http://wiki.contribs.org/SME9.1_Roadmap
http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server_10.0_Development
On 09/20/2014 04:25 PM, John Crisp wrote:
On 20/09/14 13:21, Daniel Berteaud wrote:
Le 20/09/2014 12:01, stephane de Labrusse a écrit :
Indeed we have to write and update a 'new roadmap' for the SME S
One topic that we should address is the usage of the build-in PPTP VPN
capabilities. We know it is unsafe to use, and does not fit the SME
Server philosophy. I think we should at least offer a save alternative,
and leave PPTP in with a warning.
Maybe we can take a closer look at Daniels OpenVP
Jesper,
good to see you involved.
You comments make sense to me, and I'm glad to see that you brought your
excellent expertise on the mail topic to the table. Hence this
discussion list.
I suggest we take the SME Server functionality/role to a higher level,
and see what 'visions' are out th
What would you do? I would by a next generation Tesla
So some interesting visions are posted. Like mine above, that is a bit
over the top, but you get what I mean. Like we all know, SME Server has
design principles, specifically regarding stability and security, and
bleeding edge does n
On 09/23/2014 12:07 AM, stephane de Labrusse wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 22/09/2014 22:53, Les Mikesell a écrit :
I think the real competitor would be ClearOS. Has anyone done a
feature comparison or considered joining forces as a CentOS SIG
for future versions?
I
On 09/23/2014 12:35 PM, Huib de Visser wrote:
Also, i believe there could be a great opportunity for SME if it would
be able to manage/run(backup/restore) Docker containers. If those
containers are able/configured to use SME's core services,
functionality could expand rapidly. Just my 2 cents
Hi JPP,
On 11/13/2014 03:05 PM, Jean-Philippe PIALASSE wrote:
Hi,
no reaction on Docteam list so I transfer there.
Message transféré
Hi docteam members,
I have worked on updating pertinent informations needed in one place on
the wiki . From now I need hep and volunteers to
Indeed, hats off!
FYI:
This page http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server_recent_fixes
Show a list of SME core packages issues that:
1. have been confirmed and are being worked on
2. Have been fixed and closed
both depending on status and resolution and since release of the latest ISO
The red line(
historically, Ian would announce each and every updated
e-smith-*/smeserver-* RPM on the ML.
On 12/05/2014 10:13 PM, Terry Fage wrote:
Thanks HF will certainly use that link.
I am more concerned with an update that is released that fixes a
particular issue, like the Thunderbird one now.
Th
On 12/22/2014 03:43 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote:
Le 22/12/2014 12:56, Dave Liquorice a écrit :
IMHO if they are not putting anything back into SME be that via bug fixes,
development, NFRs or financially they are effectively stealing the code and
efforts of others.
No no no, and triple no !! ;-)
On 12/23/2014 06:55 AM, Terry Fage wrote:
On 23/12/2014 8:40 AM, Ian Wells wrote:
Earlier I chose a format very similar to RedHat, an example below and
also at
http://www.wellsi.homeip.net/rnotes/sme9/9bugreport.html
Is the above url operational?
Try without the www part.
It autogenerates dr
Hi all,
the title might seem harsh, but to be honest, there are too few editors
in non English languages. Let alone in English. There are 203 editors
registered, but only a very very few actually edit. In whatever
language. So time to 'cut costs'.
The non English pages are way out of date an
On 01/11/2015 08:48 PM, stephane de Labrusse wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 11/01/2015 19:59, Hsing-Foo Wang a écrit :
What do you think?
I know that some French translators are still active IMO you will
remove them a way to be involved in the project. But I agree
On 01/25/2015 08:59 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote:
Le 25/01/2015 19:10, Terry Fage a écrit :
On 26/01/2015 4:33 AM, stephane de Labrusse wrote:
Then you should open a bug, and see with Daniel, how we can do that
and see which Data will be gathered.
If this is going to be done, it needs to be in t
Thanks.
On 13/02/16 23:44, "Jim McLaren" wrote:
>On 13/02/2016 22:36, Gavin Weight wrote:
>>
>>> On 13 Feb 2016, at 22:23, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> No difference...
>>
>> No wonder with an "attitude" like that it is n
Xavier, can you please simply leave this community. It's for the better
to all of us. Merci.
On 13/10/16 19:05, smeserve...@free.fr wrote:
Dear John,
Your culture is so light that you feel the need to use it in all your
mail...then do you remember how was the end of life of Henri II?
He fini
42 matches
Mail list logo
