While I am not much of a spelunker... why not an attribute of the QM that
displays the status (found, killed, etc..)?
class Trip():
blah ...
qms = models.ManyToMany(QM)
class QM():
blah ...
status = models.Charfield(max = 30, choices = (('found', 'found'),
('killed', 'killed')))
hth,
how about:
class Guest(models.Model):
first_name = models.CharField(maxlength=30)
last_name = models.CharField(maxlength=30)
relations = models.ManyToManyField(Relation, related_name =
'guest_relationship')
class Relation(models.Model):
guest = models.Foreignkey(Guest)
t; def __unicode__(self):
> > >return self.prot_name
> >
> > > With prot_name being the primary key field. Is that wrong?
> >
> > > Allison
> > > ps. wow you're quick to respond..thank you
> >
> > > On Jul 10, 4:56 pm, "Richard Dahl&quo
do you have a __unicode__() function for the Protein Model ala:
def __unicocde__(self):
return ('%s' % (self.name))
-richard
On 7/10/08, allisongardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Sorry about obscure title...don't know what the problem is let alone
> its name.
> I am inputting protein
You may be able to do what you want to by overriding the save() function
within the model. If you need any information from the form or related
object you could pass them as kwargs to save.
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/model-api/
-richard
On 7/2/08, Brian Rosner <[EMAIL
Also ensure that you have imported those models into your apps models.py
from django.contrib.auth.models import User
from django.contrib.contenttypes.models import ContentType
os some such import statement should be at the top of your models.py
-richard
On 7/2/08, Brian Luft <[EMAIL
Yes, of course you did, I just didn't read your post quite right, disregard.
-richard :)
On 7/1/08, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hallöchen!
>
> Richard Dahl writes:
>
> > In your example SpecialProcess inherits from Process and Sample
> >
In your example SpecialProcess inherits from Process and Sample has a M2M to
Process, where should the SpecialProcess come in?
Is this what you mean:
class Sample(models.Model):
processes = models.ManyToManyField(SpecialProcess)
If you do this, you should get SpecialProcess from
print
Not sure exactly where you are going, but what do you mean by ' Inside
views.py it only lets me send 1 queryset to the template' why can't you do
something like:
render_to_response('Template.html', {'first_qs': Model1.objects.all(),
'second_qs':Model2.objects.all()})
-richard
On 7/1/08,
Generally with HTTP, you would configure your server to continue to respond
to requests;) Which is exactly what django does anyway.
HTTP is a connection based (TCP) protocol, but the connection is closed once
the return has been sent. Hence the need to store a 'session' variable in
the server
The 'core' problem as you say, is essentially the core problem of all
programming: programs don't write themselves. You have to write appropriate
code for what you are trying to do, what does it matter if someone forgets
to add the username to the render call, or if someone forgets to add the
Well, in keeping with the spirit of the link referenced, at least its not
trac!
Seriously, though, psycopg2 is an open source library with a history of
working pretty well for what it does. AFAIK there is not a great deal of
money behind it, and so they may not have the prettiest or most useful,
That (or some variation) is the simplest way to do it, although you do not
need to attach the entire request object if you do not want to, i.e.:
return render_to_response('somepage.html',
{'username':request.user.username})
{{ username }}
On 6/24/08, Huuuze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> A
I am a bit confused, are you looking for this:
class IntegerRelation(models.Model):
content = models.IntegerField()
class A(models.Model):
integers = models.ManyToManyField(IntegerRelation)
-richard
On 6/22/08, Xan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Suposing you want a model A
new_obj = form.save()
new_objects_id = new_obj.id
hth,
-richard
On 6/23/08, Calvin Dodge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I need to get the id of a record after saving it with form.save(). I'm
> not seeing this described in the docs, and haven't dredged anything up
> by searching this group.
>
" %
> (reference_name)
>
>#send_mail(subject, message, email, '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
>request.session['first_name'] = first_name
>
>
> Do you see anything else that can be encapsulated along the same line?
> I don't have as much redundancy now, but if this is
an Lua.com has been
> received.'
>message = "Thank you for suggesting %s to us. We'll review
> your suggestion and get back to you as quickly as possible." %
> (reference_name)
>
>send_mail(subject, message, email,
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
>
put all of the otherwise duplicative code into its own function within
another module. then import that function into your views.py, i.e:
at the top of views.py:
from formprocessing.py import formprocessor
then within formproccessor.py
def processemail(email, reference_name):
subject
You should be able to access it in a template from an instance of a model
that uses it via:
model_instance_object.ROLES
but if you just want to access from the template generically, then yes, you
need to pass it to the template.
hth,
-richard
On 6/20/08, diggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
sure, its just python:
for r in ROLES:
r[0] #retrieves 'Associate' the first iteration
r[1] # also retrieves 'Associate'
You just need to ensure that ROLES is imported into your views.
hth,
-richard
On 6/20/08, diggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I've defined a set of
While I am not one to insist on 3rd normal form or anything like that, I
would recommend you look at normalizing this db a bit. Perhaps you
could create a table or two for the companies and contact info, it can be
dangerous to limit yourself to one phone number or even one address in many
cases.
Couldn't this also be done via:
Country(models.Model)
name = Char()
borders = ManyToMany(CountryBorders)
CountryBorders(models.Model):
border = models.FK(Country)
length = models.PosIntField()
With this you could have:
Country:
name: Germany
borders: France/1000Km,
I would probably just pass in a python list with all of the letters in the
alphabet, then just
{% for l in alphabet_list %} ...
-richard
On 6/17/08, M.Ganesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am relatively new to both python and django. Please help me to do this :
>
> {% for letter
What exactly are you trying to do? Are you worried about people entering
html into the form fields and having that saved to the database? If so,
Django's ORM escapes this for you when saving to the DB. you can use
jQuery's ajax functions to submit the form, and do normal form validation
with
Just an idea, not sure if it will work for you as I don't know a whole lot
about how it works, but wouldn't setting unique_together on the Relation
class for owner and pet accomplish what you want? The validation happens at
the DB level, but I believe it propogates back to the form.
hth,
-richard
I would start with 'Dive into Python' or 'How to think like a computer
scientist in python' to gain familiarity with basic python concepts.
-richard
On 6/10/08, Pedro Cora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> First of all, sorry if i'm making a question that should appear a lot
> here.
>
> I'm a
from:
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/db-api/
Backward
If a model has a ForeignKey, instances of the foreign-key model will have
access to a Manager that returns all instances of the first model. By
default, this Manager is named FOO_set, where FOO is the source model name,
In my opinion, it shouldn't matter what type of web app you are
creating, Django is a framework that can be used to develop any kind
of app you can imagine. That being said, Django was designed for a
particular use and has been tailored for that use, deviating
significantly from that
I have implemented this by looping through the form fields in a generic form
creation function. Not sure if it is the 'proper way' but it works very
well for me.
-richard
On 6/5/08, Wim Feijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Richard and Rishabh,
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Actually, I
from:http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/newforms/#widgets
class CommentForm(forms.Form):
name = forms.CharField(
widget=forms.TextInput(attrs={'class':'special'}))
url = forms.URLField()
comment = forms.CharField(
As far as the first question, I would create my own group model. My
reasoning is pretty simple, I create models based on functionality or
purpose of the object. auth.groups is essentially used to assign
permissions to users, you are really looking to associate users with
other users. So while it
Usually this would be done with a javascript function. You could display
the form but have the city field disabled until a state was chosen and then
(probably with an async call) populate the city field with a list of
relevant cities.
To just use server side validation for this you would have to
>raise errorclass, errorvalue
> OperationalError: (1054, "Unknown column
> 'itemengine_gear.generic_info__hits' in 'order clause'")
>
> The template chokes the same way trying to access the object...
> I shouldn't have to change my code?
>
> rob
>
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/db-api/
contains the info you want. Try this:
Gear.objects.select_related().order_by('generic_info__hits')
you could also set the order_by in the Meta of Item to hits and then you
could just do:
Gear.objects.select_related().order_by('generic_info')
Two options I can think of quickly:
1. in the __init__ of the form, see if a value has been passed in for the
League and School and only if there is none, create the queryset as
described.
2. Do not use a model form to create the initial form, just use a simple
template and the javascript you have
I have been working on an app that enables the completion of IT security
assessments. A version of it that I used 2 years ago did allow remote
completion of the assessments and I faced this same problem. I was not
comfortable using the django development server locally (primarily because
of the
initd.org is having problems with thier Trac implementation.
-richard
On 5/28/08, Andrew D. Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Good afternoon.
>
> When I follow the following link from the Django
> Book, v1.0 to information about using Django
> with PostgreSQL, I get redirected to a rant:
>
1. Create a custom save() method on the model that took the contents of the
field in question and called .lower() on the string - If you simply want to
make sure only lowercase letter are saved to the database.
2. Create a custom field (subclass models.CharField?) that only accepted
lowercase
You can do this with an intermediate table:
class Fruit(models.Model):
name = models.CharField()
def __unicode__(self):
return ('%s' % (self.name))
class FruitItem(models.Model):
fruit = models.ForeignKey(Fruit)
number = models.IntegerField()
def __unicode__(self):
I am not sure about any specific differences, but psycopg2 is what I
believe to be recommended by initd.org, although there seems to be a
problem with their Trac so I could not confirm. I originally (2 years
ago) setup up Django with psycopg1, but when I rebuilt my development
Not sure if there is a better way (suggestions are appreciated), but I
just use the GenericForeignKey i.e.:
class Asset(models.Model):
content_type = models.ForeignKey(AssetType)
object_id = models.PositiveIntegerField()
content_object = generic.GenericForeignKey('content_type',
Firebug is where you will get django's errors, if you are using an async
call to django (AJAX, XHR, etc..)
-richard
On 5/23/08, Peter Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > The debug information is available from firebug. You will see the
> reuest,
> > right click on it and select 'Open in
This could also be done with Generic Relationships:
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/models/generic_relations/
I use this for similiar object references. I also sometimes use
intermediary tables between the base model and the generic_relationship to
limit the types of objects that can
The debug information is available from firebug. You will see the reuest,
right click on it and select 'Open in New Tab'
-richard
On 5/23/08, Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Peter: Thanks for the reply.
>
> I do have DEBUG=True.
> I have tried both 1/0 and assert false; but both times I
This is still pretty WET for my tastes, but I do not completely understand
your requirements. Programming is after all an art and a science. I have a
tendendcy to normalize things as much as I feel is reasonable, perhaps it is
more than you require. I would at least consider something like the
I would caution you to think in the terms of the data storage
(models) separately from data entry (forms via views). Most likely you want
a class Person which would have a field for title. Maybe the title field is
a FK to the Title model, maybe it is a charfield with or without 'choices'
Why not just define your base models in a Module in your import path called
basemodels.py and import the specific base models you need into the
requisite app. You could then use model inheritance to add the specific
fiddly bits required for that app. It is just python after all. Am I
I am not really sure exactly what you are trying to accomplish here, if you
want to 'create a load of Places based on what is in RawPlaces but with a
resource' wouldn't a FK or M2M (depending on your cardinality requirements)
relationship to RawPlaces within Resource simplify this process? I am
James,
Thanks, this is great. I never made this connection before. I have
been using threadlocals for a while (to implement a custom manager
with role-based access). Since the start I have been passing a users
role as a kw argument in to the Manager via the shell for testing, and
until
how do you pass the request object to models?
-richard
On 5/19/08, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:24 PM, enri57ar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How access to request object within models ?
>
> Pass it as an argument the same as any other value. Magical
at more clear
> so please keep'em coming
>
> On May 19, 9:33 pm, sebey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ok but I may want enable it and disable it and change the message form
> > time to time which is why I would like it go though django
> >
> > On
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> ok but I may want enable it and disable it and change the message form
> time to time which is why I would like it go though django
>
> On May 19, 5:27 pm, "Richard Dahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are a number
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/CookBookThreadlocalsAndUser
-richard
On 5/19/08, enri57ar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> How access to request object within models ?
>
>
> from django.contrib.auth.models import User
>
> Class Message(models.Model):
>message = ...
>user_id =
There are a number of ways to do this, you do not need a separate template
within your template. You do not even need to use AJAX, as you seem to be
wanting to return both the main content and the 'message' in one
response.) You could simply wrap your message html in a div that is hidden
and use
. How I get B related with A? (Ok, by setting the attribute,
> but...) How can I do that by using form_for_model() according to my
> database model? The User don't have the choice to manipulate the ID of
> A or something like that. There shouldn't be a field for the ID!
>
> On 16 Mai, 22:52
For the first question, the db-api doc should provide this and more
information, as I am not sure I completely understand, but here goes
(assuming the following models):
class B(models.Model):
attribute = char()...
class A(models.Model):
attribute = char()...
bs = m2m(B)
in your
I do not think that admin currently supports this, but I could be wrong. but
here are two ways to accomplish it.
class Item(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
class ItemOrder(models.Model):
item = models.FK(Item)
order = models.int()
def __unicode__(self):
This can be done with the threadlocals middleware:
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/CookBookThreadlocalsAndUser
On 5/16/08, Chris Farley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Django has that nice "auto_add=True" property you can set on a model's
> field. I have two fields in my models called
Forgive my feeble mind, but I am trying to understand, what is the point of
substituting 'walewadu' for 1 or 2 or 3855? What security does this
provide?
-richard
On 5/15/08, Norman Harman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Gabriel wrote:
> > Mike Chambers gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >>
> >> I am
e first record with a high PK, and keep the competition
guessing as to how many records you have:)
-richard
On 5/15/08, Norman Harman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Richard Dahl wrote:
> > Mike,
> > I concur with jonknee, the attribute 'hidden' on a form field simply
>
am also not concerned about spam, but rather just dont want to expose
> raw database ids to the public.
>
> mike
>
> Richard Dahl wrote:
> > Mike,
> > I concur with jonknee, the attribute 'hidden' on a form field simply
> > tells a browser that is following the s
The CSRF middleware probably would not provide a solution for this
problem. It sets a hidden field with a value that is derived from
hashing the session id with a secret, but I do not believe it sets a
unique key per form. As long as the session was valid (assuming the
app in question is using
Mike,
I concur with jonknee, the attribute 'hidden' on a form field simply
tells a browser that is following the standards not to display it.
The form field and all of the data within it is still sent via http.
Any script or proxy (i.e. webscarab) or other mechanism such as a
sniffer can get at
I am not sure what you mean by 'passed through the form', are you
reffering to some sort of hidden form-field? I am not sure exactly
how encryption of these two fields is going to help you. If the form
processing view is publicly available, and these two values are
availble to a user (or
A third alternative is to use a GenericForeignKey. Although this may
add too much complexity. Put the GenericForeignKey in a model called
PhotoTag and create a M2M relationship between it and Photo and use it
to select either a Place or a UserProfile, i.e.
class PhotoTag(models.Model)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/9/08, Richard Dahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure what javascript library you are using based on the code
>
> Google maps. GXmlHttp is just like XmlHttpRequest
>
> Now I have this in my view:
>
>
I am not sure what javascript library you are using based on the code
snippet, but you seem to be looking for a javascript object to be
returned that contains XML. What you are returning is simply the text
'hello world' as a plain vanilla http response. You need to return
the type of object
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Richard Dahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If I said that this condition is indicative of an XSS attack vector I
> > may as well say that Apache is vulnerable to a Denial of Service
> > attack because 'after I ran apachectl stop, I co
, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -richard,
>
> On Wed, 7 May 2008, Richard Dahl wrote:
>
> > I am not sure exactly what you mean by 'not step on each others toes'
> > What exactly are you concerned with? You could very easily have a form
> > w
Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Richard Dahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Excellent, good catch, when logged out it does indeed display the
> > alert, I image it has to do with the 'next' property, which is not, I
> > be
Excellent, good catch, when logged out it does indeed display the
alert, I image it has to do with the 'next' property, which is not, I
believe, escaped, as it is not entered into the DB or presented to any
other user. So again, it begets the question: How is the XSS attack
possible?
WARNING!
I am not sure exactly what you mean by 'not step on each others toes'
What exactly are you concerned with? You could very easily have a
form with 4 phone number fields: home, office, mobile, fax; using
jQuery's .class selector i.e. $(".phone").mask("(999)999-");
you could find all of the
I don't understand how this becomes an XSS vulnerability, XSS attacks
work by having malicious scripts executed by another user. Key word
being 'another'. If this works (it gives me a 404) this is an example
where you can XSS attack yourself, but there is no reasonable what to
necessarily
try this:
result_set = Model.objects.all()
if result_set:
result_set has data
else:
result_set is empty
On 5/6/08, jwwest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What's the preferred method of checking to see if a result set is
> empty in a view? For instance, I'm writing blog software and have a
see comments inline...
On 5/5/08, phillc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> there has been a few things that i feel have been holding back from
> making my code structure/process better. i was hoping someone could
> help me on some of these questions.
>
> first:
>
> How does one develop tests
The documentation says that it is not provided by the auth system and
not built into the admin, but it may be possible. One thing you
should try is to build a custom manager for your model and use
threadlocals (search the archives for this) to enable this. Something
like:
class
You are having trouble because the form does not contain a Manager
object, it contains the primary key of a related Manager object.
try this:
m = Manager.objects.get(pk=form['manager'])
send_mail(
'Software Request', message,
sender, m.email)
-richard
On
Based on what you have described I see no reason to tie a persons
sports role to them directly, by doing something like what I suggest
below, you tie a person to a role only when they use that role (during
a game). If you think about it, this represents real life a bit more
accurately. I played
cjl,
Essentially you need metatables that can describe the attributes
relatable to your main models. I built a proof of concept db backend
last year for a 'Database Application for the Management of
Information related to all Things' , (codenamed: DAMIT) but decided
that while possible,
This is where I would suggest you rethink your data model. Is there a
reason to link Article to both Issues and Magazine?
Why not something like:
Issues has FK (magazine) to Magazine
Articles has FK (issue) to Issues
Issues could be configured to return its magazine.title and
self.issue_number
try this
pdata = myfile.objects.filter(mmtype__exact="W")
hth,
-richard
On 4/14/08, Jaap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> django version 0.96.1 on windows xp home.
>
> error is caused by statement in view:
> pdata = myfile.objects.filter(mmtype__eq="W")
>
> where the model is:
>
> mxt = (
>
How about:
a = A.objects.get(pk=1)
c = C.objects.filter(Q(a__exact = a) | Q(b__a__exact = a)).distinct()
hth,
-richard
On 4/14/08, Jeff Gentry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I have a setup that I figured I could just crib off of the
> User/Group/Permission code because the setup is
You could do something like this:
f = forms.form_for_model(modelname)
f.base_fields['fieldname'].queryset = (query_based_on_variable)
I automatically do this for a number of forms (to enforce role-based access)
by looping through the base fields:
get_form(model_type, r):
f =
I think it depends on exactly what article_count is. Is it the number of
views of the article? The total number of articles? The number of articles
related to this article? I am just not sure what you are trying to
accomplish.
-rfd
On 4/4/08, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> If I have an
I use something like this in a function that creates forms for most
of my models with some special processing based on related fields:
for n in object_instance._meta.fields:
if n.verbose_name == 'RELATED_FOREIGNKEY_MODEL_VERBOSE_NAME':
#Model has FK relation
for n in
The join table is created by django when you do a syncdb, however if
the table with the M2M relation in it is already present (as in your
case) the join table will not be created. This appears to me to be
your problem. If you want it to be a m2m relation, you can create
the join table
I have a model class 'Organization' with a parent and I do this with a
method get_child_orgs:
get_child_orgs(self):
child_orgs = []
co = Organization.objects.filter(parent__exact = self)
for c in co:
child_orgs.append(c)
gc = c.get_child_orgs()
I have used both mochikit and yahoo YUI for this, both of them work well.
JQuery show a great deal of promise as well although I have never used it.
-richard
On 10/3/07, Emmchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> @ Hraban - Thank you for your reply.
>
> Yes, I want to display up to four columns.
I can't see why that would cause a redirect, it is hard to diagnose a
problem without seeing the code or the server logs. Is the get request for
the same URL?
On 10/3/07, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm working on an advanced search feature for a website and am using
>
Django works just like any other web app. It is stateless. There is
no way of passing the object from one view to another. You must
enable sessions in order to store the user associated with any given
login. Refer to the django documentation for sessions.
-richard
On Oct 1, 2007, at 9:46
My approach to a similar problem is to instantiate a user within my test
setup and pass that user to the model.save function.
i.e
class Device(models.Model):
foo = models
bar = models
def save(self, user=None):
model_instance = save_function(self, user)
Aryko,
I didn't need row-level permissions so much as I needed role-based
permissions, sort of the same thing but not exactly. I rolled my own. I do
not believe the rlp branch is being actively maintained, but cannot say for
sure as I have not looked into it in a while.
Essentially I associate
Alper,
Do you have sessions enabled? see
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/authentication/#authentication-in-web-requestsfor
details.
As you are not doing anything special with your login function, have you
considered using the @login_required decorator on the dashboard view? I
know
It is hard to see with the indentation as it is, but it seems you are
not returning an http response if the 'if id is none:' You are
building the form for model, but it doesnt look like it is returned.
The bottom line seems to be indented to correlate to the if
request.method not the
come up with.
-richard
On Sep 27, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Lic. José M. Rodriguez Bacallao wrote:
> I'll do that
>
> On 9/27/07, Richard Dahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a row-level-permissions branch, but I do not believe it is
> actively being developed at this time. I wr
There is a row-level-permissions branch, but I do not believe it is actively
being developed at this time. I wrote my own role-based permission system
and integrated it into all of my models that require it. I have not
attempted to integrate the permission system into the admin interface
though.
Off the top of my head, how about something like this:
form_data = request.POST
form_data['domain_id'] = domain_id
form = DNSRecordForm(form_data)
if form.is_valid():
form.save()
I think you should get the idea. Obviously the DNSRecordForm will
have to have the domain field in it.
Within the Meta class of the Model you can set the default ordering of
objects when getting a list of them.
class Meta:
ordering = ['field_to_order_by']
-richard
On 9/26/07, Vitaliy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> For example i have this model:
>
> class Post(models.Model):
>#some
.
-richard
On 9/25/07, Bruno Tikami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> I'm more concerned with the query response time...
>
> thanks for your fast reply = )
>
> On 9/25/07, Richard Dahl < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Bruno,
> > It is
Bruno,
It is difficult to advise based on the information provided. Not sure
exactly what you are concerned with, postgres database size? query response
time? network transfer time? All of the above? Each of these impacts can be
dealt with differently. Perhaps if you provided some detail on
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
