Ken,
Thanks a lot; it works now. Once again, thanks everyone on the list
for the help.
Charles
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 2:40 PM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:31:25PM -0500, c cc wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> Thank you so much--it works, except there is no graph. Am I missing
>> somet
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:31:25PM -0500, c cc wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Thank you so much--it works, except there is no graph. Am I missing
> something? Thanks!
>
> Charles
>
Hi Charles,
>From the README:
GD Graphing Library
If you plan on leaving DSPAM's logging function enabled, and would
Paul,
Thank you so much--it works, except there is no graph. Am I missing
something? Thanks!
Charles
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Paul Cockings wrote:
> Please add username/password for ds...@yourdomain.tld to your htpasswd file
> or whatever mechanism you use for authentication.
>
> Then l
Hi,
Thanks for the idea, but unfortunately, it did not work either.
Charles
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Dudi Goldenberg wrote:
>
>>ls -lah /var/spool/dspam/data/mydomain.com/
>>
>>drwxrwsr-x 2 dspam dspam 4096 Sep 4 11:04 dspam
>
> A quick test (or fix) is to run apache as user dspam, or
>ls -lah /var/spool/dspam/data/mydomain.com/
>
>drwxrwsr-x 2 dspam dspam 4096 Sep 4 11:04 dspam
A quick test (or fix) is to run apache as user dspam, or add the user running
apache to group dspam.
Regards,
D.
--
Hi,
Thanks for your suggestions in your previous message! In deed, dspam
is a real user except mydomain.com, which I use to mask my real domain
on the public list. For all these time, I always used dspam, without
the domain, as my user name to log in; however, I just got an idea
from you previous
On 2012-09-05 18:20, c cc wrote:
> /var/spool/dspam/data/mydomain.com/dspam/dspam.log
>>> /var/spool/dspam/data/mydomain.com/dspam
>>> [root@mail dspam]# ls
>>> dspam.log dspam.stats
Who is the owner of these files and what permissions are set?
Please show the output of 'ls -lah
/var/spool/d
On 2012-09-05 21:30, c cc wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Again, thanks for your patience and time.
>
> I reread the webui section; at first, I thought it was the user
> permission problems too, but if it were the case, I wouldn't be able
> to log into the webui, right?
I have seen on my own setup, that you can
Tom,
Again, thanks for your patience and time.
I reread the webui section; at first, I thought it was the user
permission problems too, but if it were the case, I wouldn't be able
to log into the webui, right? I can log into the Dsapm webui, but I
just don't get any history or analysis numbers. T
On 05-09-12 19:39, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 11:20 AM, c cc wrote:
>> Tom,
>>
>> Once again, thanks for your help!
>>
>> 1. Yes, the user name is dspam
No, you misread the question. The account in dspam user database is
'ds...@domain.com' (according to your earlier copy/paste deta
On 09/05/2012 11:20 AM, c cc wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Once again, thanks for your help!
>
> 1. Yes, the user name is dspam
>
> 2. I am using Apache and the the user and group name are apache.
>
> User apache
> Group apache
>
> Maybe I am doing something wrong here, but when I entered the command
> sudo, I
Tom,
Once again, thanks for your help!
1. Yes, the user name is dspam
2. I am using Apache and the the user and group name are apache.
User apache
Group apache
Maybe I am doing something wrong here, but when I entered the command
sudo, I received the following:
[dspam@mail conf]$ sudo -u apac
Hi
1) The location of the logfile tells me that the dspam user is
'ds...@mydomain.com'. Is that the username you use on the webui?
2) You still did not check of the webui has access to the logfile. To
find out more on this, check and report the fllowing:
- The webui is served by a webserver (lig
Andreas,
Thanks for your suggestion, but it still doesn't work.
Charles
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Andreas.B wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "c cc"
> To: "Troy Ayers"
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 8:29 PM
>
Tom,
1. Yes, as you can see from below, it has the *.log and *.stats. files.
/var/spool/dspam/data/mydomain.com/dspam
[root@mail dspam]# ls
dspam.log dspam.stats
2. I am able to log into the Dspam webgui with the password; I am
receiving receiving emails with the dspam signature on it. Maybe I
- Original Message -
From: "c cc"
To: "Troy Ayers"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 8:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] web ui
> Troy,
>
> Thanks! Could you give me more details about the "user@domain?" As for
> as I know, the config.pl is
(please keep replies on-list)
Do further checks:
1) is the file there? Does it contain data?
2) did you setup your web server in a way so that it can actually read
the file? If unsure, please document what you did, and how you tried to
verify that your setup was working.
On 31/08/12 21:37, c cc
Hi,
historical data has no relaion with dspam_stats. The stats command uses
the processing engine numbers to return totals, these are always available.
The webui uses a log file that is available only when you have enabled
"UserLog on" in dspam.conf. Then, to use the data in the logfile, you
must
Troy,
Thanks! Could you give me more details about the "user@domain?" As for
as I know, the config.pl is correct, and I made only one change in the
config.pl file in which I added my own domain to
$CONFIG{'LOCAL_DOMAIN'} = "mydoamin.com". Thanks!
Charles
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Troy Ay
Paul:
Thanks! I am using version 3.10.2, and compiled from source on Centos
6.2 with Apache 2.2.15. Also, I used most of the information from the
link below for the installation. If you need more information from my
side, please let me know. Thanks for your help.
http://wiki.ledhed.net/index.php/
Probably a case where the UI expects "user@doman" or just "user", and
it's not getting the right one. configure.pl setup properly?
-Troy
On 8/31/2012 12:36 PM, c cc wrote:
> Hi, All:
>
> I am unable to retrieve any data from "history" or "analysis" via the
> Dspam WebUI; whenever I clicked on th
Hi, All:
I am unable to retrieve any data from "history" or "analysis" via the
Dspam WebUI; whenever I clicked on the "history" or "analysis" tab, I
received the error below. However, I do get the statistics from the
command line using dspam_stats though. Does anyone have any idea?
Thanks!
-
On 31/08/11 15:51, Dudi Goldenberg wrote:
>>> Viewing the actual date could make it somewhat easier to spot before a
>>> retrain attempt is made.
>>>
>>>
>> You can edit configure.pl to change the DATE_FORMAT used. We use this
>> here:
>>
>> $CONFIG{'DATE_FORMAT'} = "%a, %d %b %Y %I:%M%p"; # Date
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:21:50AM -0700, Dudi Goldenberg wrote:
> Is there a way to show Date/time instead of DOW/time in the history pages?
>
> For low volume mailboxes, you can have several msgs with "Wed xx:yy" time
> stamps, where some of them are too old and can nom be retrained (like
> We
>> Viewing the actual date could make it somewhat easier to spot before a
>> retrain attempt is made.
>>
>>
>You can edit configure.pl to change the DATE_FORMAT used. We use this
>here:
>
>$CONFIG{'DATE_FORMAT'} = "%a, %d %b %Y %I:%M%p"; # Date format in strftime
>style
Off to check it, thanks
Is there a way to show Date/time instead of DOW/time in the history pages?
For low volume mailboxes, you can have several msgs with "Wed xx:yy" time
stamps, where some of them are too old and can nom be retrained (like
Wednesday, 3 weeks ago...).
Viewing the actual date could make it somewhat e
On 31/08/11 15:21, Dudi Goldenberg wrote:
> Is there a way to show Date/time instead of DOW/time in the history pages?
>
> For low volume mailboxes, you can have several msgs with "Wed xx:yy" time
> stamps, where some of them are too old and can nom be retrained (like
> Wednesday, 3 weeks ago...
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:24:07 -0200
Felipe Szczesny Rout wrote:
> Em Sex, 2009-12-11 às 16:01 +0100, Stevan Bajić escreveu:
> > Hallo all,
>
> Hello Stevan
>
Hallo Felipe,
> >
> > some days ago Paul has posted on the developer mailing list asking for a
> > possibility to delegate the managem
Em Sex, 2009-12-11 às 16:01 +0100, Stevan Bajić escreveu:
> Hallo all,
Hello Stevan
>
> some days ago Paul has posted on the developer mailing list asking for a
> possibility to delegate the management of certain users/domains to other
> users then administrator.
>
> As usual I could not sit
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:11:51 -0800
Mark Dadgar wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> > As a plus point I promise to either replace the current Web UI with
> > something more modern or at least include that small hack I have done for
> > Paul in the contribution directory.
On Dec 11, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> As a plus point I promise to either replace the current Web UI with something
> more modern or at least include that small hack I have done for Paul in the
> contribution directory.
Replacing the web ui with something more modern would make my y
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:10:10 -0200
> Von: Felipe Szczesny Rout
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Web UI
> Helo Steve,
>
Hallo Filipe,
> I finished the translation of web ui to brazilian portug
Helo Steve,
I finished the translation of web ui to brazilian portuguese (pt_br).
Can I send you as a mail attachment or you prefer another deliver
method ?
Felipe.
Em Seg, 2009-11-23 às 09:35 +, Paul Cockings escreveu:
> Forgot to say
>
> Once you have the source code, look in this
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:08:59 -0200
> Von: Felipe Szczesny Rout
> An: Steve
> CC: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Web UI
>
> > I would not mind if you would translate the templates for the WebUI in
> I would not mind if you would translate the templates for the WebUI into
> Portuguese and send us a copy of it :)
>
>
Consider it done ! :-)
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30
Forgot to say
Once you have the source code, look in this folder
dspam/webui/cgi-bin/templates
Copy one of the country folder and rename to 'es' then make the changes
Pc
Daniel Sánchez Pearson [Hacheté Diseños Web] wrote:
Yes. Could someone give send me the lines that have to be tr
Hi Daniel,
The lastest Dspam code is held in a GIT versioning repository on source
forge. http://dspam.git.sourceforge.net/
[if you don't know GIT]
The basic process is to download a 'clone' from this repository to your
local computer. Then work on the files on your computer. Once you are
Yes. Could someone give send me the lines that have to be translated?
Thanks!
At 03:04 22/11/2009, troxlinux wrote:
in Spanish it is possible for a future not very distant?
regarsdss
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
in Spanish it is possible for a future not very distant?
regarsdss
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:50:54 -0700
> Von: Remo Mattei
> An: Steve
> CC: "dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net"
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Web UI
> I am swapt lately but I could look into the Italian let me know
>
Please d
szczesny rout"
>> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Betreff: [Dspam-user] Web UI
>
>>
>> Hello Steve,
>>
> Hallo Filipe
>
>
>> I almost finished the upgrade from 3.8.0 to 3.9.0beta4.
>> O noticed that web ui from 3.8.0 still works with new v
From: "Steve"
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Web UI
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:53:22 -0200
> Von: "felipe szczesny rout"
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: [Dspam-u
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:45:46 +0100
> Von: "Daniel Sánchez Pearson [Hacheté Diseños Web]"
>
> An: "Steve" , dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [Dspam-user] Web UI
> HI,
>
Hallo,
> If it
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:53:22 -0200
> Von: "felipe szczesny rout"
> An: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: [Dspam-user] Web UI
>
> Hello Steve,
>
Hallo Filipe
>I almost finished the upgrade from 3.8.0 t
Hello Steve,
I almost finished the upgrade from 3.8.0 to 3.9.0beta4.
O noticed that web ui from 3.8.0 still works with new version of dspam. As I
did a little modification in 3.8.0 web ui to allow-me authenticate through AD
servers (ldap). Is there a good reason to change web ui at this
45 matches
Mail list logo
