Re: [E1000-devel] Regarding LVMMC error of Intel igb driver

, 2019 6:00 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Subject: Regarding LVMMC error of Intel igb driver Hello I've found your e-mail address on https://git.digitalstrom.org/bsp/linux/commit/1516f0a6492a3d1bd9fbebeac331950986ec9a9b I was running a server in home which has Linux(ubuntu 18.04) installed with KVM

Re: [E1000-devel] link detection incorrect on i40e

> -Original Message- > From: Fujinaka, Todd [mailto:todd.fujin...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 1:14 PM > To: Fujinaka, Todd ; Stephen Hemminger > ; zhuyj > Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wim

Re: [E1000-devel] [Intel-wired-lan] Panic on next-queue i40e when rebooting

> -Original Message- > From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On > Behalf Of Alexander Duyck > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 11:07 AM > To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; intel-wired-lan l...@lists.osuosl.org> > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] Panic on

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e: Deadly GRE packet

Thanks Michal, Can we also get a full dmesg log from the receiving side during a repro? Carolyn > -Original Message- > From: Michał Mirosław [mailto:michal.miros...@atendesoftware.pl] > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 8:04 AM > To: Ronciak, John > Cc:

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e: Deadly GRE packet

> -Original Message- > From: Michał Mirosław [mailto:michal.miros...@atendesoftware.pl] > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 5:45 AM > To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org > Cc: Paweł Małachowski ; mirq- >

Re: [E1000-devel] Setting speed to 10GB on 2x40 XL710 FVL nic

> -Original Message- > From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkev...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 12:43 AM > To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [E1000-devel] Setting speed to 10GB on 2x40 XL710 FVL nic > > Hi, > Is it possible to set the speed to 10GB on 2x40 FVL nic? > >

Re: [E1000-devel] [patch] igb: cleanup igb_enable_mas() a bit

[..] I'm looking into this and while the code fix is correct, I'm not sure the underlying code is correct. Unfortunately, the person who knows the most about this is out for spring break. Can we hold off on this patch? Yes, the intended fix is good. In addition though, I think

Re: [E1000-devel] igbvf warning on 3.14.x

Adding Todd Fujinaka, who is customer support for igbvf. I'll assist if need be. Thanks, Carolyn -Original Message- From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of William Dauchy Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 12:36 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net] igb: Unset IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX-flag when falling back to msi-only

; Wyborny, Carolyn Subject: [PATCH net] igb: Unset IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX-flag when falling back to msi-only Prior to cd14ef54d25 (igb: Change to use statically allocated array for MSIx entries), having msix_entries different from NULL was an indicator that MSIX is enabled

Re: [E1000-devel] ethtool - igb -firmware version retrieved from driver ?

-Original Message- From: Stijn Vander Maelen [mailto:stiva...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 9:48 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Subject: ethtool - igb -firmware version retrieved from driver ? Carolyn, Found your email address here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch

Re: [E1000-devel] ethtool - igb -firmware version retrieved from driver ?

of the driver, then all functions begin igb_. Let me know if there's more info I can provide. Thanks, Carolyn -Original Message- From: Stijn Vander Maelen [mailto:stiva...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:33 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Subject: Re: ethtool - igb -firmware version

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net-next] igb: make local functions static and remove dead code

-Original Message- From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Kirsher Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 4:52 PM To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; net...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] igb: make

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 1/9] drivers: net: Remove unused function igb_get_eee_status_i354() in e1000_82575.c

-Original Message- From: Rashika Kheria [mailto:rashika.khe...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 4:15 AM To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH v2 1/9] drivers: net: Remove unused function igb_get_eee_status_i354() in e1000_82575.c

-Original Message- From: Josh Triplett [mailto:j...@joshtriplett.org] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 9:43 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Rashika Kheria; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V

Re: [E1000-devel] DH8900 MAC and I210-AT LAN driver conflict

. Thanks, Carolyn Carolyn Wyborny Linux Development Networking Division Intel Corporation -Original Message- From: Evan.Wang(王维) [mailto:evan.w...@advantech.com.cn] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 9:48 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn; Ronciak, John; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Cc

Re: [E1000-devel] DH8900 MAC and I210-AT LAN driver conflict

Hello Evan, I don't see the outputs you mention below attached to your email. We do need to see them, but also, I would like to suggest that you go back to to the latest 4.x.x version of igb. We don't have the DH8900 hw to test with and the newest parts supported in the 5.0.x version share

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel igb module command line configuration in kernel sources

-Original Message- From: Andrew Davidoff [mailto:david...@qedmf.net] Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 7:29 PM To: Tantilov, Emil S Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Intel igb module command line configuration in kernel sources On Thu, Sep 5, 2013

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel igb module command line configuration in kernel sources

-Original Message- From: Andrew Davidoff [mailto:david...@qedmf.net] Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 12:33 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Tantilov, Emil S; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Intel igb module command line configuration in kernel sources

Re: [E1000-devel] Fw: {ticketno:[8000746962]} - Проблема с новым драйвером под Linux

-Original Message- From: Karen Martirosyan [mailto:kar...@mail.ru] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:34 AM To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Fw: {ticketno:[8000746962]} - Проблема с новым драйвером под Linux First_name: Karen Last_name: Martirosyan Email:

Re: [E1000-devel] /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?

-Original Message- From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pa...@ucw.cz] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 5:40 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Bjorn Helgaas; Greg KH; kernel list; Joe Lawrence; Myron Stowe; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V

Re: [E1000-devel] /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?

-Original Message- From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:53 PM To: Pavel Machek Cc: Greg KH; kernel list; Joe Lawrence; Myron Stowe; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory

Re: [E1000-devel] /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?

-Original Message- From: Wyborny, Carolyn Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 7:56 AM To: 'Pavel Machek' Cc: Bjorn Helgaas; Greg KH; kernel list; Joe Lawrence; Myron Stowe; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter

Re: [E1000-devel] /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?

[..] If there's patch, I'll gladly try it :-). Thanks, Pavel Thanks Pavel, It ended up taking more time than I thought. The checking of whether ASPM is really enabled or not is, unfortunately, not as straightforward as I

Re: [E1000-devel] /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?

-Original Message- From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com] [..} We *could* consider something like this, since its scope is limited. But since the problem also occurs with Windows, it's pretty likely that there's a BIOS update to fix it. I notice on the X60 support page

Re: [E1000-devel] /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?

-Original Message- From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:57 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Pavel Machek; Greg KH; kernel list; Joe Lawrence; Myron Stowe; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose

Re: [E1000-devel] [RFC] igb: minimize busy loop on igb_get_hw_semaphore

-Original Message- From: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves [mailto:lclau...@uudg.org] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:45 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Clark Williams Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [RFC] igb: minimize busy loop on igb_get_hw_semaphore Hello, A customer

Re: [E1000-devel] /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy not writable?

-Original Message- From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com] [..] Holy cow, you guys have a lot of folks listed in MAINTAINERS for Intel drivers :) This is an ASPM question, if that helps narrow down the folks interested. Well, we try to have everyone involved, I guess. I

Re: [E1000-devel] Problems using timestamps in igb driver with I350-T2 adapter

-Original Message- From: Don Smith [mailto:smit...@cs.unc.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 2:19 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Problems using timestamps in igb driver with I350- T2 adapter This turned out

Re: [E1000-devel] Problems using timestamps in igb driver with I350-T2 adapter

-Original Message- From: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr [mailto:peter.p.waskiewicz...@intel.com] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 12:59 PM To: Don Smith Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Problems using timestamps in igb driver with I350-T2 adapter On 06/24/2013 11:38

Re: [E1000-devel] igb_reset_task and igb_close function race in igb-4.2.16

-Original Message- From: fanhe [mailto:fan...@163.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:40 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] igb_reset_task and igb_close function race in igb-4.2.16 Hi, everyone, I wonder igb has a concurrent reset and close of device

Re: [E1000-devel] interface link goes down

-Original Message- From: ratheesh kannoth [mailto:ratheesh@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 8:34 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] interface link goes down Hi, driver = igb-3.3.6 hw-mac.type = e1000_82576 media type = copper

Re: [E1000-devel] 82574L Gig E Adapter not recognized by OpenSUSE kernel 3.8.0-28-desktop

-Original Message- From: Bruce Ferrell [mailto:bferr...@baywinds.org] Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 9:49 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] 82574L Gig E Adapter not recognized by OpenSUSE kernel 3.8.0-28-desktop Any suggestions folks? Do I have a bad

Re: [E1000-devel] How to enable Adaptive RX on

-Original Message- From: Dhanasekaran Anbalagan [mailto:bugcy...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 12:14 PM To: Ben Hutchings Cc: e1000-devel; netdev Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] How to enable Adaptive RX on Hi Bean, Is there any specific modules here, we need enable

Re: [E1000-devel] igb driver failing at probe

-Original Message- From: Flavio Leitner [mailto:f...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 1:00 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] igb driver failing at probe Hi, It was told about a system failing to probe igb device: ... igb

Re: [E1000-devel] igb: Add i2c interface to igb.

-Original Message- From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 10:36 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: re: igb: Add i2c interface to igb. Hello Carolyn Wyborny, The patch 441fc6fdb47a: igb: Add i2c

Re: [E1000-devel] igb: Add i2c interface to igb.

-Original Message- From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 11:15 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: igb: Add i2c interface to igb. [..] It's just static analysis and reading the code (today's

Re: [E1000-devel] [netdev-next:master 6/14] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:7574:19: sparse: symbol 'igb_get_i2c_client' was not declared. Should it be static?

-Original Message- From: Wu, Fengguang Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 7:32 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [netdev-next:master 6/14] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:7574:19: sparse: symbol 'igb_get_i2c_client

Re: [E1000-devel] BUG? strange behavior with vlans and virtual functions on i350

-Original Message- From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@genband.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:31 PM To: Vick, Matthew Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Allan, Bruce W; Ronciak, John; Brandeburg, Jesse Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] BUG? strange behavior with vlans

Re: [E1000-devel] BUG? strange behavior with vlans and virtual functions on i350

-Original Message- From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@genband.com] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 1:43 PM To: Levy, Lior Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V

Re: [E1000-devel] rx_queue_*_csum_err increasing on igb

-Original Message- From: ScoobydooXP [mailto:scoobydo...@64systems.com] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 12:42 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Ronciak, John; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] rx_queue_*_csum_err increasing on igb Sorry for the delay in my

Re: [E1000-devel] rx_queue_*_csum_err increasing on igb

-Original Message- From: ScoobydooXP [mailto:scoobydo...@64systems.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 12:35 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Ronciak, John; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] rx_queue_*_csum_err increasing on igb Thank you for the info. Which

Re: [E1000-devel] rx_queue_*_csum_err increasing on igb

-Original Message- From: ScoobydooXP [mailto:scoobydo...@64systems.com] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:10 PM To: Ronciak, John Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] rx_queue_*_csum_err increasing on igb Replies are inline. I hope this helps.

Re: [E1000-devel] Adapter reset on 82576 and 82580 bonded pair

-Original Message- From: Simon Utting [mailto:m...@simon-utting.com] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 2:39 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Adapter reset on 82576 and 82580 bonded pair Hi, Apologies if this is missing any information, I will try

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel PRO/1000 (82574L) randomly loses connection

-Original Message- From: Topi Mäenpää [mailto:topi.maen...@intopii.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 10:06 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Intel PRO/1000 (82574L) randomly loses connection Hi, I'm having serious trouble with Intel PRO/1000

Re: [E1000-devel] kernel panic

-Original Message- From: Artem Bokhan [mailto:a...@eml.ru] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:49 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] kernel panic Sorry again, http://pix.academ.org/img/2012/08/08/07a2e123fc35442f0cbc446d337f1558.jpg On 08.08.2012 20:45,

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net-next] igb: add delay to allow igb loopback test to succeed on 8086:10c9

-Original Message- From: Stefan Assmann [mailto:sassm...@kpanic.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:44 AM To: net...@vger.kernel.org Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wyborny, Carolyn; sassm...@kpanic.de Subject: [PATCH net-next] igb: add delay to allow igb loopback test

Re: [E1000-devel] link loss with Intel I340-T4 and CentOS 6.2

Any news on this issue? Any known workaround? I can report the exact same problem but with a QuadPort ET (82756-based) card on a Dell Server T410 G11. Also, CentOS did not work neither does Proxmox (debian-based) with kernel 2.6.32-12-pve (latest stable). IGB driver is the latest, I also

Re: [E1000-devel] For the e1000e driver, ethtool is printing speed and duplex while link is not detected.

-Original Message- From: Steven La [mailto:steven...@riverbed.com] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 11:13 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] For the e1000e driver, ethtool is printing speed and duplex while link is not detected. Oops... I forget to mention

Re: [E1000-devel] link loss with Intel I340-T4 and CentOS 6.2

-Original Message- From: Marcelo Bello [mailto:marcelo.be...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 7:03 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] link loss with Intel I340-T4 and CentOS 6.2 *Re: [E1000-devel] link loss with Intel I340-T4 and CentOS

Re: [E1000-devel] igb 82576 dropping multicast packets

-Original Message- From: Andrew J. Schorr [mailto:asch...@telemetry-investments.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:24 AM To: Brandeburg, Jesse Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] igb 82576 dropping multicast packets Hi, I sent this a week ago, and haven't

Re: [E1000-devel] Problem with 82575GB Card and packets/s capabilities.

-Original Message- From: junkmail [mailto:junkm...@lone.ath.cx] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 9:30 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] Problem with 82575GB Card and packets/s capabilities. [..] options igb RSS=1 Above is how file

Re: [E1000-devel] query for i350 network card test under linux

-Original Message- From: Jack Wang [mailto:jack_w...@usish.com] Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2012 11:56 PM To: Linux NICS Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] query for i350 network card test under linux Hi all, I want to find a tool to verify the network card hardware

Re: [E1000-devel] Dell R720 SR-IOV failure with igb

-Original Message- From: Dax Kelson [mailto:dkel...@gurulabs.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 4:18 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Dell R720 SR-IOV failure with igb I'm working on a Dell R720 server. The NIC daugherboard has 4 ports. Qty 2 ports with

Re: [E1000-devel] link loss with Intel I340-T4 and CentOS 6.2

-Original Message- From: Nick [mailto:n...@deepgroove.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 12:14 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] link loss with Intel I340-T4 and CentOS 6.2 On 05/29/2012 11:18 AM, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote: -Original

Re: [E1000-devel] Dell R720 SR-IOV failure with igb

-Original Message- From: Wyborny, Carolyn [mailto:carolyn.wybo...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 4:09 PM To: Dax Kelson; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Dell R720 SR-IOV failure with igb -Original Message- From: Dax Kelson [mailto:dkel

Re: [E1000-devel] Strange Issue with igb driver

-Original Message- From: Mirko Leanza [mailto:m.lea...@resi.it] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 1:11 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn; 'Mirko Leanza'; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: R: [E1000-devel] Strange Issue with igb driver Hi and thank you very much! The WA works great, also if I

Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs.

-Original Message- From: Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 3:58 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel list Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs. [..] Did you find any time to pursue this? Hello Ben, We've created a sample

Re: [E1000-devel] Strange Issue with igb driver

-Original Message- From: Mirko Leanza [mailto:m.lea...@resi.it] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 1:10 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn; 'Mirko Leanza'; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: R: [E1000-devel] Strange Issue with igb driver Hi and thank you very much! The WA works great, also if I

Re: [E1000-devel] Strange Issue with igb driver

-Original Message- From: Mirko Leanza [mailto:mik...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 3:56 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Strange Issue with igb driver Hi all, I've a strange issue with igb driver, In a complex aTCA enviroment we have a CPU

Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs.

-Original Message- From: Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 3:58 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel list Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs. Did you find any time to pursue this? Thanks, Ben Hello Ben, I haven't had time

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel 82574L rx_short_length_errors

-Original Message- From: Aleksey Chudov [mailto:aleksey.chu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 7:49 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Intel 82574L rx_short_length_errors Then I tied to insert in one server additional NIC 82576 connected to the

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel 82574L rx_short_length_errors

-Original Message- From: Aleksey Chudov [mailto:aleksey.chu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 11:53 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Intel 82574L rx_short_length_errors Then I tied to insert in one server additional NIC

Re: [E1000-devel] Enable VF only on 2nd 82576 port

-Original Message- From: Jemma Jones [mailto:jemmajone...@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:26 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Enable VF only on 2nd 82576 port Hi, I've got a 82576 car with 2 ports. They show up on my system as 2 physical

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e interface hang on 82574L

-Original Message- From: Chris Boot [mailto:bo...@bootc.net] Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 10:54 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: netdev; lkml; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: e1000e interface hang on 82574L [...] Carolyn, I've just had the opportunity to upgrade to a 3.2.9

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e interface hang on 82574L

-Original Message- From: Nix [mailto:n...@esperi.org.uk] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 9:20 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Chris Boot; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; netdev; lkml Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e interface hang on 82574L [...] you'll see that I tested

Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs.

-Original Message- From: Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:30 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel list Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs. [..} But, though I receive packets just fine, I do NOT see the 4 bytes of FCS

Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs.

-Original Message- From: Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:30 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel list Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs. On 02/21/2012 04:23 PM, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote: -Original Message

Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs.

-Original Message- From: Wyborny, Carolyn [mailto:carolyn.wybo...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 12:30 PM To: Ben Greear Cc: e1000-devel list Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs. -Original Message- From: Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com

Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs.

-Original Message- From: Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 1:02 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel list Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs. On 02/24/2012 12:50 PM, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote: -Original Message

Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs.

-Original Message- From: Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:30 PM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel list Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs. On 02/21/2012 04:23 PM, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote: -Original Message

Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs.

-Original Message- From: Ben Greear [mailto:gree...@candelatech.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 10:09 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: e1000-devel list Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Question on igb and rx-fcs. On 02/21/2012 09:51 AM, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote: -Original Message

Re: [E1000-devel] interface counters

-Original Message- From: Bokhan Artem [mailto:a...@eml.ru] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:12 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Brandeburg, Jesse; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] interface counters 15.12.2011 22:51, Wyborny, Carolyn пишет: -Original

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e interface hang on 82574L

-Original Message- From: Chris Boot [mailto:bo...@bootc.net] Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 3:11 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: netdev; lkml; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: e1000e interface hang on 82574L On 04/01/2012 17:12, Chris Boot wrote: On 03/01/2012 00:02, Wyborny

Re: [E1000-devel] Linux igb issue

-Original Message- From: Azher Mughal [mailto:az...@hep.caltech.edu] Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 6:59 AM To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Wyborny, Carolyn Subject: Linux igb issue Hi All, I downloaded the latest driver from sourceforge ver 3.3.6 and it has your patch. Removing the older

Re: [E1000-devel] igb + balance-rr + bridge + IPv6 = no go without promiscuous mode

-Original Message- From: Chris Boot [mailto:bo...@bootc.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 8:58 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Nicolas de Pesloüan; netdev; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: igb + balance-rr + bridge + IPv6 = no go without promiscuous mode On 04/01/2012 16

Re: [E1000-devel] igb + balance-rr + bridge + IPv6 = no go without promiscuous mode

-Original Message- From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Boot Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 1:53 PM To: Nicolas de Pesloüan Cc: netdev Subject: Re: igb + balance-rr + bridge + IPv6 = no go without promiscuous mode On 23/12/2011

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e interface hang on 82574L

-Original Message- From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chris Boot Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2011 1:32 AM To: netdev; lkml; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: e1000e interface hang on 82574L On 27 Dec 2011, at 22:01, Chris

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net-next] igb: reset PHY after recovering from PHY power down

-Original Message- From: Koki Sanagi [mailto:sanagi.k...@jp.fujitsu.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 7:18 PM To: net...@vger.kernel.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck

Re: [E1000-devel] interface counters

-Original Message- From: Bokhan Artem [mailto:a...@eml.ru] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 9:26 AM To: Brandeburg, Jesse Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] interface counters 13.12.2011 23:57, Jesse Brandeburg пишет: On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 04:16 -0800,

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net-next 2/2] igb: offer a PTP Hardware Clock instead of the timecompare method

; Wyborny, Carolyn Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] igb: offer a PTP Hardware Clock instead of the timecompare method On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 02:33:09PM -0800, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 19:00 -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: This commit removes the legacy timecompare code from

Re: [E1000-devel] interface counters

-Original Message- From: Bokhan Artem [mailto:a...@eml.ru] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 9:44 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Brandeburg, Jesse; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] interface counters 15.12.2011 22:51, Wyborny, Carolyn пишет: I will be updating

Re: [E1000-devel] Tuning driver igb to routing

-Original Message- From: Welisson [mailto:welissont...@ig.com.br] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 7:54 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Tuning driver igb to routing Hi, I have a NIC quad port (82576) used driver igb, but when compiling driver i don' t

Re: [E1000-devel] interface counters

-Original Message- From: Allan, Bruce W [mailto:bruce.w.al...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 9:05 AM To: Brandeburg, Jesse; Bokhan Artem Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] interface counters -Original Message- From: Jesse Brandeburg

Re: [E1000-devel] programm eeprom - 82574L

-Original Message- From: 5snkaz3...@snkmail.com [mailto:5snkaz3...@snkmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 09, 2011 9:12 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn; E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wyborny, Carolyn Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] programm eeprom - 82574L Wyborny, Carolyn wrote at 08:00 -0800

Re: [E1000-devel] programm eeprom - 82574L

-Original Message- From: 5snkaz3...@snkmail.com [mailto:5snkaz3...@snkmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 8:27 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] programm eeprom - 82574L How do I program the eeprom on the 82574L under linux? I have a new part on an

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net-next] igb: reset PHY after recovering from PHY power down

-Original Message- From: Koki Sanagi [mailto:sanagi.k...@jp.fujitsu.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 7:18 PM To: net...@vger.kernel.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck

Re: [E1000-devel] Issue with (Intel 82576 Gigabit - Quad Port Server Adapter, ET2

-Original Message- From: John Haechten [mailto:jhaech...@crossroads.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 8:36 AM To: John Haechten; Brandeburg, Jesse; Wyborny, Carolyn; e1000- de...@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] Issue with (Intel 82576 Gigabit - Quad Port Server

Re: [E1000-devel] Issue with (Intel 82576 Gigabit - Quad Port Server Adapter, ET2

-Original Message- From: John Haechten [mailto:jhaech...@crossroads.com] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 8:38 AM To: John Haechten; Wyborny, Carolyn Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] Issue with (Intel 82576 Gigabit - Quad Port Server Adapter, ET2 Carolyn, Did you get the files

Re: [E1000-devel] Issue with (Intel 82576 Gigabit - Quad Port Server Adapter, ET2

The output looks to be from after the problem has happened. The bus info after the quad 82576 card is all unretrievable in the lspci outputs. Can you also reboot the system and provide new lspci outputs so we can look at the setup and the ASPM status. As Jesse suggested, there appears to be

Re: [E1000-devel] Issue with (Intel 82576 Gigabit - Quad Port Server Adapter, ET2

-Original Message- From: John Haechten [mailto:jhaech...@crossroads.com] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 3:23 PM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Issue with (Intel 82576 Gigabit - Quad Port Server Adapter, ET2 I have run into an issue with an Intel 4 Port

Re: [E1000-devel] looking for source for igb driver version 3.0.3

-Original Message- From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@genband.com] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:44 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Brandeburg, Jesse; Kirsher, Jeffrey T Subject: [E1000-devel] looking for source for igb driver version 3.0.3 Hi, I've got a board for

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel 82580 loopback test fail

-Original Message- From: Zhaobing [mailto:soldier.zhaob...@huawei.com] Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 1:18 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Wangshiwen Subject: [E1000-devel] Intel 82580 loopback test fail Hi, I am an engineer of Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd,my name

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel i350 under igb?

-Original Message- From: Andy Cress [mailto:andy.cr...@us.kontron.com] Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 7:19 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Intel i350 under igb? Is the Intel i350 Powerville NIC supported under the igb driver? If so, what is its PCI ID?

Re: [E1000-devel] Driver issue with I340-T2/hardware timestamping

-Original Message- From: amnon cohen [mailto:amnonbc...@googlemail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 6:10 AM To: Dan Tucholski Cc: Wyborny, Carolyn; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Driver issue with I340-T2/hardware timestamping You need to define ensure

Re: [E1000-devel] Driver issue with I340-T2/hardware timestamping

-Original Message- From: Dan Tucholski [mailto:dtuchol...@telosalliance.com] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 9:07 AM To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Subject: [E1000-devel] Driver issue with I340-T2/hardware timestamping Hello, I am doing research with two of your intel I340-T2 gigabit network

Re: [E1000-devel] 2.6.39: kernel igb and e1000e-1.3.17 driver broken?

-Original Message- From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 4:43 PM To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 2.6.39: kernel igb and e1000e-1.3.17 driver broken?

Re: [E1000-devel] igb driver throughput on Intel E31320 vs Intel X3450

-Original Message- From: Ed Ravin [mailto:era...@panix.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:55 PM To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] igb driver throughput on Intel E31320 vs Intel X3450 I'm beginning to wonder whether this is cache line bouncing. I went to the X3450

Re: [E1000-devel] 82573L NVM Checksum is not valid, no eth0

-Original Message- From: Joshua Stein [mailto:joshua.lee.st...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 2:49 AM To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82573L NVM Checksum is not valid, no eth0 Hello, This is an old issue and I cannot figure out how to fix it. I have an

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] igb: restore EEPROM 16kB access limit

-Original Message- From: Andy Gospodarek [mailto:a...@greyhouse.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 7:16 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: Andy Gospodarek; Stefan Assmann; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000- de...@lists.sourceforge.net; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Pieper, Jeffrey E; Ronciak, John Subject

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] igb: restore EEPROM 16kB access limit

-Original Message- From: Stefan Assmann [mailto:sassm...@kpanic.de] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 8:07 AM To: Wyborny, Carolyn Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Pieper, Jeffrey E; Ronciak, John; Andy Gospodarek Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb

  1   2   >