Re: [O] how do you compose mails in Gnus with org-mode

> Thorsten Jolitz writes: > PS > you do have this variable defined, right? > , > | mail-header-separator is a variable defined in ‘sendmail.el’. > | Its value is "--text follows this line--" > | > | Documentation: > | Line used to separate

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

Hi Thomas, "Thomas S. Dye" writes: > Instead, let's move the project forward with the understanding that > if it proves to be a bad idea, then the Org mode community will have > Nicolas' very nice .texi file (with backports by Kyle Meyer) to fall > back on. Maybe we are

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I disagree. My motivation is not to attract more contributors. I don't > think this was Thomas and Jonathan's motivation when they started the > project either, but I may be wrong. For the record, I think having more contributors

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > You recently re-introduced a file named "orgmanual.org" in contrib/ > alongside "manual.org". The former is apparently outdated. Yes, my mistake, fixed now. -- Bastien

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

Hi Achim, Achim Gratz writes: > I've posted a working Makefile back when Thomas was working on the > manual and it is still working with minimal modifications. If you > decide you want to have this (and exactly which way) I'm sure that can > be further refined in a matter of

Re: [O] how do you compose mails in Gnus with org-mode

Uwe Brauer writes: "Thorsten" == Thorsten Jolitz writes: > >> Uwe Brauer writes: >> "Thorsten" == Thorsten Jolitz writes: >>> >>> > Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: >>> > Hallo >>>

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

phillip.l...@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: > Probably, by the time all of the manuals are in org-mode, > machines will be significantly faster, there will be emacs-free org mode > converter, or we will have hit the heat death of the universe. Perhaps > it's not a problem. :) The output

Re: [O] how do you compose mails in Gnus with org-mode

>>> "Thorsten" == Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: > "Thorsten" == Thorsten Jolitz writes: >> >> > Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: >> > Hallo >> >> >> I know that the subject of my email exists

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

Aloha Bastien, I disagree that the manual project should move into a one year probation where success is measured by the number of contributors. So, my response to LETS GO! is NOT THERE! Instead, let's move the project forward with the understanding that if it proves to be a bad idea, then

Re: [O] Agenda bug

Eric S Fraga writes: > On Tuesday, 6 Mar 2018 at 11:23, Robert Horn wrote: >> I discovered that the lines ( the body of a headline): >> *** real headline >>* example >>:SCHEDULED: >> >> cause agenda processing to fail. It tries to parse as a >> timestamp. The parser used by

Re: [O] [Error]

Uwe Brauer writes: "Thorsten" == Thorsten Jolitz writes: > >> Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: >> Hallo > >>> I know that the subject of my email exists already. >>> >

Re: [O] how do you compose mails in Gnus with org-mode

Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Uwe Brauer writes: > > "Thorsten" == Thorsten Jolitz writes: >> >>> Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: >>> Hallo >> >>>> I know that the subject of my email exists already.

Re: [O] org-adapt-indentation 'content (was Re: [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core)

Hi Nicolas, Christian Moe writes: >>> Me too, for the same argument. But this points to a strong limitation >>> to `org-adapt-indentation' for which I'd like to propose this change. >>> >>>(setq org-adapt-indentation t) => current behavior >>> (setq

Re: [O] how do you compose mails in Gnus with org-mode

Uwe Brauer writes: "Thorsten" == Thorsten Jolitz writes: > >> Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: >> Hallo > >>> I know that the subject of my email exists already. >>> >

Re: [O] Adding an item to the agenda from the agenda view

Dear all, Many thanks for your responses. So as I understand it,there are two ways to achieve what I am trying to do: either through diary, or through capture. I am not sure which I should choose, though. Since it seems my initial message was somehow unclear, let me try to explain what I am

[O] partly automating backporting [was Re: [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core]

On 3/6/18, Achim Gratz wrote: > I haven't looked at how often changes to Org's manual actually originate > on the Emacs side in one development cycle of Emacs (which is generally > a year or more, but it can't be that much. it is an interesting technical question whether we

Re: [O] Bug: Broken orgmode.org links in doc/misc/org.texi and lisp/org

Hi Tim, Tim Landscheidt writes: >> - https://orgmode.org/org-remember.pdf >> - https://orgmode.org/worg/code/org-info-js/ >> - https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages.html >> - https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-lilypond.html >> -

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

Bastien Guerry writes: >> Exactly. Emacs will anyways ship with org.texi. So moving the manual >> source to Org in the Org repo shouldn't concern the Emacs repo. > > Yes, but it is still a concern for Emacs contributors like Glenn and > others who occasionnally make corrections in Emacs' org.texi.

Re: [O] Adding an item to the agenda from the agenda view

Shérab writes: > Dear all, [...] > When I want to schedule a dinner with John, what I currently do is: > > 1. C-c a a > > 2. Look for a date > > 3. (say I find that April 1st isalright) > > 4. quit the agenda view > > 5. Visit the buffer corresponding to

Re: [O] Bug: Broken orgmode.org links in doc/misc/org.texi and lisp/org

I wrote: > […] > The following links in Emacs master's doc/misc/org.texi and > lisp/org are broken (404): > - https://orgmode.org/org-remember.pdf > - https://orgmode.org/worg/code/org-info-js/ > - https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages.html > -

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

Aloha Bastien, Bastien writes: Hi Thomas, "Thomas S. Dye" writes: Instead, let's move the project forward with the understanding that if it proves to be a bad idea, then the Org mode community will have Nicolas' very nice .texi file (with backports by Kyle Meyer) to fall

Re: [O] Adding an item to the agenda from the agenda view

On Tuesday, 6 Mar 2018 at 22:15, Shérab wrote: [...] > I am fine with steps 1 to 3 but would like to do steps 4 to 8 in a much > more efficient way, without having to re-enter the date, but with the > same result,i.e. the heading being added atthe endo of ~/gtd/agenda.org > > Do I make more

Re: [O] Agenda bug

On Tuesday, 6 Mar 2018 at 11:23, Robert Horn wrote: > I discovered that the lines ( the body of a headline): > *** real headline >* example >:SCHEDULED: > > cause agenda processing to fail. It tries to parse as a > timestamp. The parser used by agenda appears not to enforce

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

Hello Thomas, as a preamble, let me say that I appreciate the directness of your message and the civil tone of this conversation. I understand there are frustrations lingering around, I have my own too, so let's keep this thread as constructive as possible, because we all deserve it as a

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

Hi Kaushal, Kaushal Modi writes: > Exactly. Emacs will anyways ship with org.texi. So moving the manual > source to Org in the Org repo shouldn't concern the Emacs repo. Yes, but it is still a concern for Emacs contributors like Glenn and others who occasionnally make

Re: [O] Concatenating header args

Hello, John Kitchin writes: > I am pretty sure this isn't possible. The headers get overridden by the > most local settings. There isn't a way to concatenate them. In some cases > there isn't a way to figure out what you want, e.g. if a heading property > said ":tangle

[O] [Error] (was: how do you compose mails in Gnus with org-mode)

>>> "Thorsten" == Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: > Hallo >> I know that the subject of my email exists already. >> [[https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2009-08/msg00855.html]] > This works

Re: [O] Bug: Mode line face is not updated when clock overruns [9.1.7 (release_9.1.7-466-ga16590.dirty @ /home/luke/elisp/org-mode/lisp/)]

Hello, Luke writes: > The face of the clocked time does not seem to change when the clock > overruns (typically it changes to a red background). > > I'm no lisp expert, but after digging around in the code it looks like > the problem is in

[O] Concatenating header args

Hello, how can I concatenate header args? Let's assume I have an Org structure like follows: * foo :PROPERTIES: :header-args: :flags -Wall :END: ** bar #+begin_src C :flags -lm #+end_src Now I want the code to be compiled with -Wall _and_ -lm. Regards hmw

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

Aloha Bastien, Bastien Guerry writes: Maybe this is where some misunderstanding arose: to me, there was no _project_ to migrate to manual.org -- it was an idea in the air after you made your experiment and we now have the decision at hand because the project is, well, DONE. We could have

Re: [O] how do you compose mails in Gnus with org-mode

>>> "Thorsten" == Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Joseph Vidal-Rosset writes: > Hallo >> I know that the subject of my email exists already. >> [[https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2009-08/msg00855.html]] > This works

Re: [O] Concatenating header args

I am pretty sure this isn't possible. The headers get overridden by the most local settings. There isn't a way to concatenate them. In some cases there isn't a way to figure out what you want, e.g. if a heading property said ":tangle no" and your header said ":tangle yes" it would not make sense

[O] Agenda bug

I discovered that the lines ( the body of a headline): *** real headline * example :SCHEDULED: cause agenda processing to fail. It tries to parse as a timestamp. The parser used by agenda appears not to enforce the requirement that headlines begin with asterisks on the left

[O] Bug: exclude symlinked directory from publishing [9.1.6 (9.1.6-57-gec8590-elpa @ /home/michel/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20180219/)]

Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.

Re: [O] How to keep correct filepaths when using the #+INCLUDE derivative?

Hello, Daniel P Gomez writes: > I noticed that (buffer-file-name (buffer-base-buffer)) will always > return nil because `org-export--prepare-file-contents` is called in > `org-export-include-keyword` after a call to `with-temp-buffer`. Two > possible solutions to this

Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

My 2¢ on this topic: 1. org is an excellent tool for writing. I cannot consider writing with any other tool these days. 2. texi is an excellent tool for reading/browsing documentation. Likewise, I cannot imagine doing so in another tool (in the Emacs sphere). We should find a way to