Re: [PSES] Radiated Emissions - How many points to QP?

Hi Larry, I agree with you completely...I think the lab didn't see that peak going over the limit line and therefore didn't QP. We only noticed now that they have sent the report several weeks later. They're arguing that there is no need to retest. Thanks, Mark From: Larry K. Stillings

[PSES] Radiated Emissions - How many points to QP?

limit. Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks, Mark - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG All emc-pst

Re: [PSES] High Touch Current in Industrial Machinery

Hi Brian, Since this is machinery, typically IEC 60204-1 would be applied. Check out clause 8.2.6 Additional requirements for electrical equipment having earth leakage currents higher than 10 mA. Best regards, Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | AUTOBAG(r) brand Equipment | Streetsboro, OH

Re: [PSES] safety under single fault

Just a simple reminder, especially if anyone uses their employer or private business devices to use AI tools: the information used for questions immediately and forever becomes public property. -Original Message- From: Ralph McDiarmid Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 2:08 PM To:

Re: [PSES] Timeframe for new FCC registration

to be able to submit to FCC and ISED databases. Mark From: Brian Gregory Sent: Monday, October 9, 2023 1:44 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Timeframe for new FCC registration Hello, I'd like to have all options fleshed out prior to committing to a fairly expensive quote for full

Re: [PSES] Hazard warning labels on panel doors where COTS UPS installed?

Wouldn't this fall under the requirement from 60204-1 clause 5.3.5 for Excepted Circuits? "Permanent warning label(s) shall be appropriately placed in proximity to the operating means of the supply disconnecting device to draw attention to the hazard" Best regards, Mark Stult

Re: [PSES] How to Measure Surface Conductivity?

Hi Brian, You may want to consider repeating test #3 after environmental conditioning. The true test of a plating is corrosion resistance over time. Best of luck, Mark Stultz | CMSE | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro, OH | 330-342-2402 From: Brian Kunde Sent: Tuesday

Re: [PSES] Link to secondary legislation draft RE: [PSES] SI amendment providing UKCA label deadline extension.

scheduled for a vote. Best regards, Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro, OH | 330-342-2402 From: Richard Georgerian Sent: Monday, 28 November, 2022 10:41 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Link to secondary legislation draft RE: [PSES] SI

Re: [PSES] RoHS Exempt Industrial Machinery

Bridge-type milling and drilling machines; o Metal forming presses; o Newspaper printing presses; Best regards, Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro, OH | 330-342-2402 From: Brian Kunde Sent: Tuesday, 26 July, 2022 10:36 AM To: EMC-PSTC

Re: [PSES] Removable door panel grounding

. Best regards, Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro, OH | 330-342-2402 From: James Pawson (U3C) Sent: Friday, 17 June, 2022 3:43 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Removable door panel grounding CAUTION: This email originated from

Re: [PSES] Removable door panel grounding

In my experience, a single connection point is risky as it only takes a small amount of corrosion to cause the machine to fail the 60204-1 ground bond test. Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro, OH | 330-342-2402 From: Ken Javor Sent: Thursday, 16

Re: [PSES] Removable door panel grounding

is installed. You'll need the panel and gasket plated so that there is no corrosion that would increase the contact resistance since this arrangement can't be considered gas-tight. Best regards, Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro, OH | 330-342-2402 From

Re: [PSES] AW: Short Range Device RED standard?

this helps. Mark On 4/28/22 2:49 AM, Dürrer Bernd wrote: Hi Ryan, For the radio module that you describe, the following standards are applicable: ETSI EN 300 328 V2.2.2 (https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300300_300399/300328/02.02.02_60/en_300328v020202p.pdf) is the applicable standard

Re: [PSES] Risk assessment versus HBSE

could be present. There is some data out there for impact with adults in industrial environments, but precious little... well, nothing that I've found so far... involving contact with children. Thanks, Mark On 2/23/22 8:01 PM, Douglas E Powell wrote: Looks very interesting, I'll have to fit

Re: [PSES] Risk assessment versus HBSE

injury, such as being more easily pushed down and hitting their head on the floor. In fact, I am interested to know if there are others out there who are aware of any data or studies regarding impact with children. Thanks, Mark Hi Doug: Thanks for your comments. What bothers me

Re: [PSES] IP Code Question

with IP32, we typically make sure that any water that enters the enclosure will be directly away from any components therein and toward drain holes at the bottom of the enclosure. Best regards, Mark Stultz From: Brian Kunde Sent: Monday, 14 February, 2022 9:23 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] [PSES] Magnets as reliable fasteners

Ted brings up a great point and it a good reminder that, in addition to the standards, you need a cross-functional risk analysis. This is why I always bring in a Service Tech from the field to take part in the risk analysis. They have shown me several "tool holders" over the ye

Re: [PSES] Magnets as reliable fasteners

need to be brought before the committee. Best regards, Mark Stultz From: Gary Tornquist <05big...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, 8 February, 2022 9:52 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Magnets as reliable fasteners You don't often get email from 05big...@gmail.com<mai

Re: [PSES] Machinery Leakage Current

Many thanks to all for the great conversation on this. I've learned quite a bit! Mark Stultz From: MIKE SHERMAN Sent: Thursday, 3 February, 2022 3:48 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Machinery Leakage Current CAUTION: This email originated from outside

[PSES] Machinery Leakage Current

IEC 60335-1. Is there another source for leakage current limits that is machinery-specific? There is nothing in the type-C standard for this product type. Thanks, Mark Stultz - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety E

[PSES] ISO/IEC symbol for SCCR

Hello, Does anyone know of an ISO or IEC symbol for short circuit current rating? Is it acceptable to abbreviate as SCCR or will this need translated? Thanks, Mark Stultz - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety

Re: [PSES] Multiple Power cord-sets bundled with product

We build a top-level generic and then pack the power cord right before crating. Where we run into issues is when we have a distributor in Europe or Asia orders the machine based on their location but the end-user is in a different country. Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | Automated

Re: [PSES] Demo exception for EAC certification for Russia

Wonderful, Thanks! Mark Stultz | CMSE® | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro, OH | 330-342-2402 From: Graevinghoff Andreas (ETAS/NE) Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 12:13 PM To: Stultz, Mark ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: Demo exception for EAC certification

[PSES] Demo exception for EAC certification for Russia

Machinery and many other products require EAC certification or declaration prior to "placing on the market" in Russia or other EAEU countries. Does anyone know if there is an exception for demo or trade show machines? Thanks in advance, Mark Stultz 10175 Philipp Parkway Senior

[PSES] Ganged Conductors in Machinery

Hello all, Is it permissible to combined separate conductors to carry a load in parallel within machinery? If it is allowable, what derating would be required? I can't find reference to this in IEC 60204-1 or NFPA 79. Many thanks, Mark Stultz 10175 Philipp Parkway Senior Mechanical

Re: [PSES] engineering rules of thumb

I believe Doug is going forward with the meeting. My mistake was sending a calendar invite to the whole list rather than my personal calendar. Sorry for the confusion. Mark Stultz | CMSE® | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro, OH | 330-342-2402 From: Bansi Patel Sent

Re: [PSES] engineering rules of thumb

My apologies for the meeting spam... Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro, OH | 330-342-2402 -Original Appointment- From: Stultz, Mark <0f79f2e10e47-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> On Behalf Of Stultz, Mark Sent: Tuesday, March 16,

[PSES] Canceled: engineering rules of thumb

:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0700 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN="Stultz, Mark":mailto:mark.stu...@sealedair.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=doug emces d.com:mailto:d...@

[PSES] engineering rules of thumb

:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0700 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN="Stultz, Mark":mailto:mark.stu...@sealedair.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=doug emces d.com:mailto:d...@

[PSES] OATS installation

Hello, In an effort to get more accurate pre-compliance measurements, we're looking into building an OATS setup. Does anyone know of any companies in the US that will install/build one? Thanks, Mark Stultz 10175 Philipp Parkway Senior Mechanical Development Engineer Streetsboro, OH 44241

Re: [PSES] Use of Electrical Enclosure as the Ground Bus

bells for me which is what prompted re-reading the standards. This machine will be sold worldwide, but mostly in the US, Canada, and the EU. We typically apply IEC 60204-1 for electrical safety and EN 415-10 (Packaging Machinery: General). Thanks, Mark Stultz | CMSE® | Sealed Air | Automated

[PSES] Use of Electrical Enclosure as the Ground Bus

on connecting the bonding system this way? Is NFPA 79 as inflexible in this regard as I am reading it? Thanks in advance, Mark Stultz 10175 Philipp Parkway Senior Mechanical Development Engineer Streetsboro, OH 44241 CMSE® - Certified Machinery Safety Expert (TÜV NORD) 330-342-2402 Automated

Re: [PSES] SPVD Interpretation

. Best regards, Mark Stultz | CMSE(r) | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems | Streetsboro, OH | 330-342-2402 From: David Cereceres Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 1:45 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] SPVD Interpretation CAUTION: This email originated from outside

[PSES] Japan PSE Labeling

Anyone know where to find vector files (dxf, ai, pdf, et cetera) for the PSE mark for Japan? Or dimension requirements? Thanks, [cid:image001.png@01D5F87E.2E1AE560] Mark Stultz 10175 Philipp Parkway Senior Mechanical Development Engineer Streetsboro, OH 44241 CMSE® - Certified Machinery

Re: [PSES] Mandatory certification

Hello Kevin, Thanks for the great explanation. Who is ultimately responsible for ensuring that equipment is certified by a NRTL? Does the final responsibility fall on the purchaser/end-user or on the manufacturer? Best regards, Mark Stultz | CMSE® | Sealed Air | Automated Packaging Systems

[PSES] Residual Voltage Tester

Hello, Anyone know of a good tester for IEC 60204-1 and 60335-1 residual voltage that's available in the US? I'm looking at http://www.stanmax.nl/index.php/msom/ but not sure about leadtime from NL. Thanks! [cid:image001.png@01D5DA7B.4CAEE2E0] Mark Stultz 10175 Philipp Parkway Senior

Re: [PSES] 80/80 rule

John, would be beneficial if you can share your earliest recollection of the dates, besides stating it dates back much further. Mark From: John Woodgate Organization: J M Woodgate and Associates Reply-To: John Woodgate Date: Monday, November 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM To: Subject: Re: [PSES] 80

[PSES] Japan PSE Mfg Testing

t? Is it ground/bond resistance? Thanks, [cid:image005.png@01D59097.7E4A7D10] Mark Stultz 10175 Philipp Parkway Senior Mechanical Development Engineer Streetsboro, OH 44241 CMSE® - Certified Machinery Safety Expert (TÜV NORD) 330-342-2402 Automated Packaging Systems [A picture contai

Re: [PSES] Trusted resources for RoHS/Reach

<mailto:paul.good...@era.co.uk> http://blog.complianceandrisks.com/commentary-analysis/uk-reach-after-brexit Mark Schmidt From: Grasso, Charles [mailto:charles.gra...@dish.com] Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 4:03 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Trusted resources for RoHS/Reach Hello e

[PSES] Compliance Engineer Opportunity at SpaceX

is the job post. https://grnh.se/acfc73d22. Please contact Jennifer Tran with all of the inquiries and responses. jennifer.t...@spacex.com<mailto:jennifer.t...@spacex.com>; P: 310.970.3507 Thank you, Mark Gandler - This m

Re: [PSES] E-Stop Questions

with the red button? Someone suggested blue as a background color because allegedly this is easier for color blind persons to see. What standard(s) does this requirement come from? Thanks, Mark Mark Ortlieb Sr. Product Safety Engineer 858-207-7591 Brain Corporation™ 9401 Waples Street, Suite

[PSES] RED EU radio restrictions

they are? Thanks, Mark Mark Ortlieb Sr. Product Safety Engineer Brain Corporation™ 9401 Waples Street, Suite 100<https://maps.google.com/?q=9401+Waples+Street,+Suite+100+San+Diego,+CA%C2%A0+92121=gmail=g> San Diego, CA<https://maps.google.com/?q=9401+Waples+Street,+Suite+100+San+Diego,

Re: [PSES] PLINE 1610

Thanks Doug… From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 11:42 AM To: Schmidt, Mark ; EMC-PSTC Subject: Re: [PSES] PLINE 1610 You might try ATE Corp. They still rent these and may also have maintenance shop services. Anyway, you could ask. Best, Doug

[PSES] PLINE 1610

for looking at it. Thanks, Mark Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer

Re: [PSES] Radio and Machinery Directive

. This will be provided by the LSEM. The Power Source will also be approved and qualified by the LSEM. Naturally, we will assure that our components in their installation will not prohibit final compliance requirements but. Thanks again, Mark From: lauren.cr...@us.tel.com [mailto:lauren.cr

[PSES] Radio and Machinery Directive

completed machinery is placed on the market a CE mark is not required, so a Declaration of Incorporation will be issued. This is an industrial application and one of the pieces that will be part of this installation is BT compliant for USA, Canada, EU, China, Japan and S. Korea. What would be my

Re: [PSES] A question about FDA language and interlocking devices

n any moving part other than the door."” Compliance Guide for Cabinet X-Ray Systems https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ucm094358.htm Mark From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 12:31 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject:

[PSES] UK Gov Using The UKCA Mark

All, Just received the following link from a colleague, using the UKCA marking if the UK leaves the EU without a deal. Links to part of the "[PSES] Brexit requirements for UK manufacturers" a couple of weeks ago. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prepare-to-use-the-ukca-

Re: [PSES] Brexit requirements for UK manufacturers.

integrity which is unlike the CE Mark. So to John’s point no I do not agree with your interpretation of what I said. From: Pete Perkins [mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 11:58 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Brexit

Re: [PSES] Brexit requirements for UK manufacturers.

: the manufacturer is ultimately responsible for their product. Mark From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 3:05 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Brexit requirements for UK manufacturers. That puts the responsibility for compliance

Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5 Surge Testing Single plug vs. multiple plug system

Agreed, however this is typically done in the qualification and preliminary test phase of system integration. You should always know what your margins/limitations are. I believe the question focused on final test and in that case you test to the requirements of the standards. From: John Howe

Re: [PSES] IEC 61000-4-5 Surge Testing Single plug vs. multiple plug system

have design's or systems that have 2 or 3 external power cords and these of course are tested independently since end use intended configuration is to supply AC with multiple AC Main connections. Regards, Mark From: Larry K. Stillings [mailto:la...@complianceworldwide.com] Sent: Wednesday, January

Re: [PSES] Does incorporated barcode scanner result in a new laser product?

the action or process of providing someone or something with an “official document” attesting to a status or level of achievement. Thank you. From: lauren.cr...@us.tel.com [mailto:lauren.cr...@us.tel.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2018 10:51 AM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE

Re: [PSES] Does incorporated barcode scanner result in a new laser product?

ropriately classified. If not be prepared to add time and money to your program for addition testing. Mark From: Lauren Crane [mailto:lauren.cr...@us.tel.com] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 4:04 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Does incorporated barcode scanner result in a

Re: [PSES] Rechargeable li-ion batteries in toys for infants...

I believe UL/IEC 62133 would also be applicable to the battery pack and don’t forget to contact your local shipping/transport company on li-on battery requirements UN3480 and 3481. Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient,

Re: [PSES] Rechargeable li-ion batteries in toys for infants...

to be used with the toy - what is Note 3 in section 1 (scope) of EN62115. Mark Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content

Re: [PSES] EU Requirements for Sample Performance Assessment.

Great Question. No absolute answer but my opinion would be create awareness. 1. Generate an official legal disclosure agreement between both parties with the understanding that your potential customer understands the fact this is not yet compliant outside the US and they will assume

Re: [PSES] How to lose another million dollars

Ignorance can be achieved at all levels of management. Not sure escalating is the best way forward. Just sayin. From: John Allen [mailto:09cc677f395b-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 1:19 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] How to lose another

Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Sometimes the simple aspects aren't

James – Thank you! I see they do a Stainless Steel M3 x 6mm long plain stud so I will pass that onto our DO and see what they think: electrically it’s ideal for a crocodile clip and pointed probe for a four terminal resistance test. With best regards, Mark From: James Pawson (U3C) Sent: 03

[PSES] Sometimes the simple aspects aren't

be used on/in/through C-section steel prior to painting, that can subsequently be used as an earth bond (at 10 A DC) test point, that will last for decades, and look good? Ever hopeful, Mark Mark Hone Electrical Manager TPG Maritime Ltd [cid:image003.png@01D4436F.32931D80]Email: mark.h

Re: [PSES] External toothed star washer used in earth connection

Hi Scott, Can’t remember for sure (since I no longer have access to a copy of the standard) but IPC-A-610 may provide guidance on acceptability criteria for that. Regards, Mark From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2018 9:22 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG

Re: [PSES] SEV Mark Required for Swiss Adapter Plug?

Hi Mike, SEV or ENEC Mark - Yes. It’s a corporate liability question or applied due diligence to protect your consumer. How did you verify the certification to the IEC standards? Either way I would think that your corporate layers would advise 100% to the letter of the law. Which doesn’t help

Re: [PSES] SEV Mark Required for Swiss Adapter Plug?

Hey Mike, Personally, I would accept that but….. I will refer back to my “grey” statement. Mark From: msherma...@comcast.net [mailto:msherma...@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2018 1:25 PM To: Schmidt, Mark Cc: EMC-PSTC Subject: Re: SEV Mark Required for Swiss Adapter Plug? "How di

Re: [PSES] Safety Test Templates Question

Hi Brian, “The good-old-days” Where have all the good times gone? Legislation destroyed the essence of common sense practices and logic. Influenced by power (monetary) and opinion which equates to politics. Yup, I said the “P” word. Regards, Mark From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku

[PSES] Compliance/Safety Engineer Position at juniper

/jobdescription.html?jid=939161 Please contact me directly at mgand...@juniper.net<mailto:mgand...@juniper.net> Thank you, Mark Gandler (Hiring Manager) - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society em

Re: [PSES] Dips and interruptions when connected to UPS

Agree with Charles, you need to provide a compliant system to the end user. This means test with the UPS since it plugs into the AC Mains. Regards, Mark From: Grasso, Charles [mailto:charles.gra...@dish.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 10:38 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES

Re: [PSES] Customer Requests for Risk Assessments

Integrators of complex systems interfacing with other manufacturers equipment, aerospace and military excluded and should provide a RAR. I am sure there are other situations as well. If we look at Brian's intro to his question "Our company makes Laboratory Equipment (test and measurement

Re: [PSES] Customer Requests for Risk Assessments

Nice. From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 3:59 PM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Customer Requests for Risk Assessments An engineer and a lawyer argued about whose was the oldest profession. 'The creation

Re: [PSES] Customer Requests for Risk Assessments

with their time but to create chaos. Making corporate life difficult and sometimes meaningless. There was a time where Company A produced and sold a product and Company B said wow what a great product. The end. Regards, Mark Schmidt From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] Sent

Re: [PSES] South Africa radio approvals

Hi Doug, Yes, this is normal. I do not believe 3rd parties could influence or expedite services with the ICASA due to the fact that they may be in violation of their own anti-bribery polices. That couldn't happen could it? Regards, Mark From: Kealey, Doug [mailto:doug.kea...@garmin.com] Sent

Re: [PSES] Doug Smith's second teaser

I’d like to second John’s query, as I haven’t seen the explanation either. If it has been posted, are EMC-PSTC postings being lost somewhere? I have checked our company spam filters! Regards, Mark From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk] Sent: 08 February 2018 14:15 To: EMC-PSTC

Re: [PSES] FCC 433 MHz

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Michael Derby <micha...@acbcert.com> Date: 02/09/2018 4:54 PM (GMT-05:00) To: "Schmidt, Mark" <markschm...@xrite.com>, EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC 433 MHz ---

Re: [PSES] FCC 433 MHz

Hi Ghery, Thank you for your input. Best Regards, Mark From: n6...@comcast.net [mailto:n6...@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 3:40 PM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: RE: [PSES] FCC 433 MHz Mark, "It depends". What is the purpose you have in mind

[PSES] FCC 433 MHz

Hello Group, Can anyone tell me if 433 MHz is a restricted operating frequency for commercial devices per the FCC? Thank you. Best Regards, Mark Schmidt Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email

[PSES] Eval and Demonstration Units

otype for evaluation only" or is more complex than that. Best Regards, Mark Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that t

Re: [PSES] [Commercial] [PSES] Standards - CNS, KN, SI

Hi Grace, My understanding is that the KN standards need to be purchased and are written in Korean. I believe they are derived from the IEC but are not identical. You may want to add KN35 to your list. Regards, Mark From: Grace Lin [mailto:graceli...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Re: [PSES] Battery Charger

Hello Brian, This was defined by a NRTL to be a Class III battery charger. Thank you, Mark From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 1:55 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Battery Charger From: Schmidt, Mark

Re: [PSES] Battery Charger

thanks for that. In talking with some NRTL's and the direction they believe is appropriate can lead/mislead you down a path that may not be logical one. Thanks again, Mark From: Ted Eckert [mailto:ted.eck...@microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 12:21 PM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC

[PSES] Battery Charger

protection is in the 2 cell battery pack. Would have LED indicator(s) for charge status. Size: approximately 5" x 3" x 2" Are there any battery charger standards that may be applicable? Does this battery charger need to be Listed or Recognized by NRTL. Any thoughts or inputs are welcome?

Re: [PSES] [Commercial] [PSES] Labeling - battery operated products

be advantageous. Mark From: Schmidt, Mark [mailto:markschm...@xrite.com] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2017 8:36 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [External] Re: [PSES] [Commercial] [PSES] Labeling - battery operated products This message originated from the outside of our organization and was sent

Re: [PSES] [Commercial] [PSES] Labeling - battery operated products

to a distributor or another office or branch of your company. This is not easily done and very complicated, I am not an expert talk to your shipping company. Mark From: Amund Westin [mailto:am...@westin-emission.no] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2017 12:35 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject

Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling

Thank you, Mark From: Ben Kim [mailto:benki...@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2017 12:03 AM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling Hi Mark, RRA notice 2015-26 and KATS announcement (date 4/26/2016) include this information. Click

Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling

Thank you Ben, Is there a link to this that is accessible? Is it on the RRA or KATS site? Regards, Mark From: Ben Kim [mailto:benki...@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 1:42 PM To: Schmidt, Mark; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] KC Mark E labeling Mark, e-labelling

[PSES] KC Mark E labeling

are designing the physical label for this OEM right now. Do I have to keep the KC MSIP ID on the physical label? Thanks, Mark Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

ated with a harmonised standard that determines the conformity assessment procedure? Best regards Mark B *From:* Michael Derby [mailto:micha...@acbcert.com] *Sent:* 28 June 2017 23:02 *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards If you have a transmitter-only de

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

parameters.” So it IS a harmonised standard (no requirement for EU type approval examination if applied in full) but it doesn’t give a presumption of conformity (manufacturer may be required to do additional testing to ensure receiver parameters meet article 3.2 requirements?). Mark Bailey

[PSES] UL 773

limit but inside the UL 773 limit? BR Mark Bailey - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All em

Re: [PSES] crimp hardware for multiple conductors?

Hi Adam, For quick connects, whatever you do, make sure it conforms to UL310 if your product is attempting to meet the requirements of UL60950. Regards, Mark From: Adam Dixon [mailto:lanterna.viri...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 7:45 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject

Re: [PSES] Korea KN 32

Hello Dieter, My experience with Korea is that they only accept 10 meter measurements even for KN 32. Not sure where you can get a Korean Standard in English. I doubt if they are available unless you have it translated of course. Regards, Mark Schmidt From: Paasche, Dieter [mailto:dieter.paas

Re: [PSES] lowest emissions 4k TV?

Great discussion - thanks to all. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen" Date: 01/14/2017 6:06 AM (GMT-05:00) To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] lowest

Re: [PSES] lowest emissions 4k TV?

In the project that I am currently working on the main PC, HDMI cable and Touchscreen is a subsystem of a larger system which includes hydraulics, turntables, D65 lamps, power supplies and many other sources of potential emissions for this device. Only the poorly constructed HDMI cable is the

Re: [PSES] lowest emissions 4k TV?

cable for RF. Thanks, Mark From: Ghery S. Pettit [mailto:n6...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 8:39 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] lowest emissions 4k TV? Brent, I ran into a problem with HDMI cables back in 2014. It seems that the HDMI specification

Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for EMC testing purposes

Hi John, Would this be applicable for Light Industrial equipment as well? Thank you. From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:49 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Criteria for determining industrial vs. non-industrial for EMC

Re: [PSES] Fire ants

if it did, I would migrate to it being an H field effect. Mark From: Doug Powell [mailto:doug...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 10:36 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Fire ants This topic is getting interesting.. I had originally thought it would be received like one

[PSES] RoHS and CE Discussion for component

to apply a CE mark on the component because it is a requirement of the RoHS Directive. In addition since we plan on meeting the EMC Directive requirements (good engineering practices) we must label the component with the CE Mark and generate a DoC to the EMC and RoHS Directive. We have received

Re: [PSES] EU RoHS Exempt Components

Hi Brian, The EU does not require disclosure of an exemption, for China RoHS a disclosure table is required. Always a good idea to have this information internally if ever challenged. Regards, Mark From: Kunde, Brian [mailto:brian_ku...@lecotc.com] Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:34 AM

[PSES] Desktop Power Supplies

? As part of the system compliance testing the desktop PSU will be included in the desktop test set-up for radiated emissions and we'll do AC port conducted emissions.testing. Assuming the system passes I can then put the appropriate mark/ wording on my product but am I also required to put the same mark

[PSES] 61000-3-2

are required. Is this correct? Thank you, Mark Schmidt - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to <emc-p...@ieee.org> All em

Re: [PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Components

Carl, In regard to your statement Another package may include plastic panels with no inherent standalone function In this case there are no harmonized standards that I am aware of for plastics so I will further assume that no CE Mark is required. Mark Schmidt -Original Message- From

Re: [PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Components

Components In message 119fa9545c6e264b830c4582886d1190c534d...@quimby.dw.local, dated Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Mark Schmidt mark.schm...@dornerworks.com writes: In regard to your statement Another package may include plastic panels with no inherent standalone function In this case there are no harmonized

  1   2   3   4   >