On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:16:12 +0100 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> On 09/02/17 00:47, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 15:12:56 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> > said:
> >
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> On 07/02/17 10:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 7 Feb
Hello.
On 09/02/17 04:50, Simon Lees wrote:
>
>
> On 02/09/2017 12:42 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 07/02/17 10:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 18:25:58 +1030 Simon Lees said:
>>>
On 02/06/2017 10:06 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wro
Hello.
On 09/02/17 00:47, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 15:12:56 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> said:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 07/02/17 10:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 18:25:58 +1030 Simon Lees said:
>>>
On 02/06/2017 10:06
On 02/09/2017 12:42 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/02/17 10:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 18:25:58 +1030 Simon Lees said:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/06/2017 10:06 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
Time-based releases keep the expectations
On 02/08/2017 11:59 PM, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
> I don't get the reluctance on releasing now. IMO, if we stop releasing
> in a timely fashion, EFL will become full of bugs again. EFL was
> becoming quite stable with the releases that Stefan has been managing.
> If we start questioning the
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 15:12:56 +0100 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/02/17 10:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 18:25:58 +1030 Simon Lees said:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/06/2017 10:06 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Time-based releases keep t
Hello.
On 07/02/17 10:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 18:25:58 +1030 Simon Lees said:
>
>>
>>
>> On 02/06/2017 10:06 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>>
>>> Time-based releases keep the expectations if they are followed. Once
>>> we miss the frame, we start to
Hello.
On 07/02/17 08:28, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:56:38 +0900 Jean-Philippe André
> said:
>
>> My only point with gl filters, eo intf and cmake is that we have those
>> works in progress that need to be put on hold if we're intent on doing this
>> release
Hello.
I let this thread sit for a while to get some more insights.
On 07/02/17 03:56, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Sorry, it looks like I worded my questions badly :)
>
> On 6 February 2017 at 20:36, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Stefan Schmidt
I'm agreeing with Felipe here.
What say ye?
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Felipe Magno de Almeida <
felipe.m.alme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't get the reluctance on releasing now. IMO, if we stop releasing
> in a timely fashion, EFL will become full of bugs again. EFL was
> becoming quite st
I don't get the reluctance on releasing now. IMO, if we stop releasing
in a timely fashion, EFL will become full of bugs again. EFL was
becoming quite stable with the releases that Stefan has been managing.
If we start questioning the releases, we will always find reasons why
not to release now. Bu
>> Like I'd love to see efl_net being tested in the field as it's what
>> ecore_con uses internally to provide legacy, as well as people being
>> able to use the Eo API directly.
>>
>
> People can't use the EO API directly. Or are we declaring EO stable now? If
> so we need to properly separate whi
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 18:25:58 +1030 Simon Lees said:
>
>
> On 02/06/2017 10:06 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >
> > Time-based releases keep the expectations if they are followed. Once
> > we miss the frame, we start to have this feature-based releases ("oh,
> > waited so long, can wait a
On 02/06/2017 10:06 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
> Time-based releases keep the expectations if they are followed. Once
> we miss the frame, we start to have this feature-based releases ("oh,
> waited so long, can wait a bit more") and when people work
> independently, they always have
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:56:38 +0900 Jean-Philippe André said:
> My only point with gl filters, eo intf and cmake is that we have those
> works in progress that need to be put on hold if we're intent on doing this
> release properly. In other words: stop developing in branches, except for
> the regu
Hey,
Sorry, it looks like I worded my questions badly :)
On 6 February 2017 at 20:36, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > On 06/02/17 10:33, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 1 February 2017 at 23:46, Stefa
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 06/02/17 10:33, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 1 February 2017 at 23:46, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On 12/12/16 11:34, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
Next try. People started to ask me
Hello.
On 06/02/17 10:33, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1 February 2017 at 23:46, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 12/12/16 11:34, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Next try. People started to ask me about 1.19 again more recently so
>>> here is my new schedule proposal
Hi,
On 1 February 2017 at 23:46, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 12/12/16 11:34, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Next try. People started to ask me about 1.19 again more recently so
> > here is my new schedule proposal for 1.19.
> >
> > 2016-08-11 Merge window for 1.19 opens
> > 2
Hello.
On 12/12/16 11:34, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Next try. People started to ask me about 1.19 again more recently so
> here is my new schedule proposal for 1.19.
>
> 2016-08-11 Merge window for 1.19 opens
> 2017-02-07 Merge window is over.
> * Only bug fixes from this point
> * Al
Great. I'm looking forward to the next Edi release which is once again
dependent upon the next major EFL release :)
Andy
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 at 11:44, Al Poole wrote:
> Month of stabilization sounds good!
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Next tr
Month of stabilization sounds good!
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Next try. People started to ask me about 1.19 again more recently so
> here is my new schedule proposal for 1.19.
>
> 2016-08-11 Merge window for 1.19 opens
> 2017-02-07 Merge window is over.
Hello.
Next try. People started to ask me about 1.19 again more recently so
here is my new schedule proposal for 1.19.
2016-08-11 Merge window for 1.19 opens
2017-02-07 Merge window is over.
* Only bug fixes from this point
* Alpha release tarball
* One month stabilization phase starts
201
Hello.
On 14/11/16 02:55, Gyuyoung Kim wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
>
> I wanna start to prepare EWebKit 1.19 version soon. Please let me know when
> EFL 1.19 candidate is prepared.
>
> I will make EWebKit 1.19 based on the candidates.
Great to hear!
We have not finalized the 1.19 schedule yet. The da
Hello Stefan,
I wanna start to prepare EWebKit 1.19 version soon. Please let me know when
EFL 1.19 candidate is prepared.
I will make EWebKit 1.19 based on the candidates.
BR,
Gyuyoung.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 1.18 is out for almost a month now. Ti
On 10/26/2016 10:32 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 26/10/16 12:28, Simon Lees wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/26/2016 07:43 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On 24/10/16 19:42, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> On 12/09/16 19:
Hello.
On 26/10/16 12:28, Simon Lees wrote:
>
>
> On 10/26/2016 07:43 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 24/10/16 19:42, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt
>>> wrote:
On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, S
On 10/26/2016 07:43 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 24/10/16 19:42, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> On 10/09/16 01:29, Ce
On 10/26/2016 07:57 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 24/10/16 23:01, Simon Lees wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/25/2016 04:12 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt
>>> wrote:
On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, S
Hello.
On 10/09/16 00:37, Andrew Williams wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The schedule sounds fine - you're right there is plenty to do.
> But. I feel after the Eo API is still not stable after 1.18 that maybe the
> release milestones should be a feature / API / completeness commitment
> rather than time?
Do yo
Hello.
On 24/10/16 23:01, Simon Lees wrote:
>
>
> On 10/25/2016 04:12 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric B
Hello.
On 24/10/16 19:42, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
>>> wrote:
On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:08:58 +0200 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> On 25/10/16 03:56, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:49:27 +0200 Stefan Schmidt
> > said:
> >
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> On 13/09/16 00:31, Simon Lees wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 09/13/2016 12:28 AM
Hello.
On 25/10/16 03:56, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:49:27 +0200 Stefan Schmidt
> said:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 13/09/16 00:31, Simon Lees wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/13/2016 12:28 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrot
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:31:33 +1030 Simon Lees said:
>
>
> On 10/25/2016 04:12 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt
> > wrote:
> >> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
> >>> wrote:
> On 10/09/16
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:49:27 +0200 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> On 13/09/16 00:31, Simon Lees wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 09/13/2016 12:28 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review
On 10/25/2016 04:12 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
>>> wrote:
On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need to be
done regarding Efl
Hello.
On 13/09/16 00:31, Simon Lees wrote:
>
>
> On 09/13/2016 12:28 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need to be
>>> done regarding Efl new interface task, but I hope that
Hello.
On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need to be
>>> done regarding Efl new interface task, but I
On 14/09/16 17:53, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 13/09/16 23:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> I
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 13/09/16 23:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
>>> wrote:
On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review
On 09/14/2016 07:37 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hello,
I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what stil
On 13/09/16 23:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hello,
I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need t
Hello.
On 12/09/16 19:01, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need to be
>>> done regarding Efl new interface task, but I
On 09/13/2016 12:28 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need to be
>> done regarding Efl new interface task, but I hope that 1.19 will be
>> our final call. We do now have time to
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need to be
>> done regarding Efl new interface task, but I hope that 1.19 will be
>> our final call. We do now have t
Hello.
On 10/09/16 01:29, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need to be
> done regarding Efl new interface task, but I hope that 1.19 will be
> our final call. We do now have time to cleanup example and check that
> things look fine.
Please
On 09/10/2016 08:07 AM, Andrew Williams wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The schedule sounds fine - you're right there is plenty to do.
> But. I feel after the Eo API is still not stable after 1.18 that maybe the
> release milestones should be a feature / API / completeness commitment
> rather than time? Honest
Hello,
I fully agree with Andrew. I have yet to review what still need to be
done regarding Efl new interface task, but I hope that 1.19 will be
our final call. We do now have time to cleanup example and check that
things look fine.
Thanks,
Cedric
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Andrew William
Hi.
The schedule sounds fine - you're right there is plenty to do.
But. I feel after the Eo API is still not stable after 1.18 that maybe the
release milestones should be a feature / API / completeness commitment
rather than time? Honestly right now I want to avoid another release that
may not be
Hello.
On 05/09/16 16:20, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 1.18 is out for almost a month now. Time to start thinking about the
> schedule for 1.19.
>
> Personally I would like that we get back to our original 3 months
> schedule as soon as possible. Reality is that we had to postpone some
> wor
Hello.
1.18 is out for almost a month now. Time to start thinking about the
schedule for 1.19.
Personally I would like that we get back to our original 3 months
schedule as soon as possible. Reality is that we had to postpone some
work on interfaces towards 1.19 so I want to gather some input
53 matches
Mail list logo
