One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/3/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-01, 18:00:16
Subject: Re: Against
Why Peirce ?
Peirce's philosophy is a philosophy of science,
a fact that should meet with agreement here.
As such, his philosophy to some extent includes
change.
So far, we have been referring to the necessary
(Platonia) and the contingent (actuality). The
necessary is timeless and always
I accidentally sent the email below out too early.
I see what you mean about the need for plum orchards etc in
the brain. I was simply assuming that comp could do whatever
is needed and didn't think through what I had said.
Obviously an over-assumption.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
Roger,
Isn't your god an observer?
Richard
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
One cannot have 1p if there is no observer.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/3/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving
On 02 Dec 2012, at 19:33, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/2/2012 1:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 Nov 2012, at 21:28, meekerdb wrote:
On 11/30/2012 10:02 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
And a transcendent truth could be arithmetic truth or
the truth of necessary logic.
True in logic and formal
On 02 Dec 2012, at 19:56, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 12/2/2012 1:31 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/2/2012 12:56 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 12/1/2012 11:23 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/1/2012 6:42 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 12/1/2012 9:18 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/1/2012 5:50 PM, Stephen P.
On 12/3/2012 7:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
So our existence at the current level is bad' and we are to
revert back to some primitive non-tech version and be happy. OK.
Proceed there without me. I am not interested in telling you how to
live your life, just respect my basic human rights:
Hi meekerdb
1p is not a fiction. Your 1p is what is reading this page.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/3/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: meekerdb
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-02,
Hi Richard Ruquist
Yes, God is the supreme observer. See Leibniz.
The supreme monad sees all clearly.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/3/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver:
RC,
So the entire universe can be in 1p at all times.
RR
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Yes, God is the supreme observer. See Leibniz.
The supreme monad sees all clearly.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/3/2012
Forever
On 02 Dec 2012, at 21:23, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/2/2012 10:43 AM, John Clark wrote:
Now it's usually down is some kind of detector that amplifies the
effect of each electron. Neither one has anything to do with
destroying the electron.
You don't need to destroy the electrons you just
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Did you mean I saw W or M, which is indeed confirmed by the two
copies? Or I saw W or I saw M, which again is confirmed by the two copies?
I meant that a observer who did not want to play games and honestly wanted
to convey the
On 03 Dec 2012, at 00:04, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/2/2012 7:27 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
The 1p truth of the machine is not coded in the machine. Some
actual machines knows already that, and can justified that If there
are machine (and from outside we can know this to correct) then the
On 12/3/2012 9:11 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
Stephen,
Your point in context of climate change with another reefer madness
study permeated by various formulations of may is what?
Me too, I see all these folks from the sixties and seventies, that
have kept their smoking habits go
On 12/3/2012 4:42 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi meekerdb
1p is not a fiction. Your 1p is what is reading this page.
Where did I refer to 1p? Where did I call anything a 'fiction' Are you replying to the
voices in your head? Don't put words in my mouth.
Brent
[Roger Clough],
On 12/3/2012 4:53 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
You might be right, I am not sure. Then, the fear sellers did not need the climate
change for imposing tyranny: food and drug works already very well. (Cf Obama and the NDAA).
And they might be related, as Henry Ford said already in before 1930, --why
On 12/3/2012 8:46 AM, John Clark wrote:
If the information is not recorded, e.g. the photon is absorbed or is
just let
travel off to infinity the interference is lost.
That is incorrect, you've got it backward. If the information on what slit the electron
went through is not
On 12/3/2012 10:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 03 Dec 2012, at 00:04, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/2/2012 7:27 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
The 1p truth of the machine is not coded in the machine. Some actual machines knows
already that, and can justified that If there are machine (and from outside we
On 12/3/2012 11:00 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Maybe you can help me figure out which scientific study is cause for concern and which
is not. They are all loaded up with maybe and might, etc. That is the nature of
science,
In the case of climate change there is a big uncertainty which is
Dear Roger and Friends,
You might find this paper of some interest:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.7188
Leibniz's Laws of Continuity and Homogeneity
Mikhail G. Katz, David Sherry
(Submitted on 30 Nov 2012)
We explore Leibniz's understanding of the differential calculus, and
argue that his
On 12/3/2012 8:54 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
RC,
So the entire universe can be in 1p at all times.
RR
Dear Richard,
How would one prove that all observations that that 1p has are
mutually consistent? Unless you assume that the speed of light is
infinite, and thus there exists a unique
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:26 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 12/3/2012 8:46 AM, John Clark wrote:
If the information is not recorded, e.g. the photon is absorbed or is
just let travel off to infinity the interference is lost.
That is incorrect, you've got it backward. If the
22 matches
Mail list logo
