Le 25 mars 2015 07:23, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net a écrit :
On 3/24/2015 11:18 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le 25 mars 2015 05:08, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au a
écrit :
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:25:04AM +0100, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le 25 mars 2015 00:11, meekerdb
On 3/24/2015 11:18 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le 25 mars 2015 05:08, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
mailto:li...@hpcoders.com.au a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:25:04AM +0100, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le 25 mars 2015 00:11, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
Le 25 mars 2015 03:49, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
Then the john-before-he-measures-the-photon-spin can't measure the
photon spin,
Photons have polarization not spin, electrons spin but obviously
Le 25 mars 2015 05:08, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:25:04AM +0100, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le 25 mars 2015 00:11, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net a écrit :
When rerunning the program with the recorded initial input, by
hypothesis
the second run
Le 25 mars 2015 07:27, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com a écrit :
Le 25 mars 2015 07:23, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net a écrit :
On 3/24/2015 11:18 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le 25 mars 2015 05:08, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au a
écrit :
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:15 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
it will be more than human.
I'm not sure what that means.
It means that a future machine can perform any task in a way that is
superior to way that
2015-03-25 16:35 GMT+01:00 Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com:
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-25 12:25 GMT+01:00 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com:
2015-03-25 12:09 GMT+01:00 Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au:
Quentin
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-25 12:25 GMT+01:00 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','allco...@gmail.com');:
2015-03-25 12:09 GMT+01:00 Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au
On 25 Mar 2015, at 12:25, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Multiple realisation does not undermine physical supervenience...
what undermine it, is that you're forced to accept (with the movie
graph argument) that the consciousness is supervening on the movie +
broken gate... which is absurd, and
On 24 Mar 2015, at 06:05, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 02:17:40PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
If you take the block universe model seriously then we are nothing
more than conscious recordings!
Fair point!
I don't know what MGA stands for, or what it
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:33 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Generally when Watson was wrong he knew he was probably wrong. I find
that significant.
I find that significant too, but this probability is
On 24 Mar 2015, at 06:47, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/23/2015 10:31 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
meekerdb wrote:
On 3/23/2015 10:05 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 02:17:40PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
If you take the block universe model seriously then we
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Generally when Watson was wrong he knew he was probably wrong. I find
that significant.
I find that significant too, but this probability is ultimately computed
by analysing frequencies of occurrence of terms and
On 24 Mar 2015, at 06:31, Bruce Kellett wrote:
meekerdb wrote:
On 3/23/2015 10:05 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 02:17:40PM +1100, Bruce Kellett wrote:
If you take the block universe model seriously then we are nothing
more than conscious
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
No, when you measure the spin of an electron, you don't have memories of
seeing spin up and spin down,
That is true you don't have such memories, but the electron does. Because
of this if you DON'T measure the spin of the
On 26 March 2015 at 07:00, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Yes, I also suspect that no deity exists but it will, in the future.
If you are curious about how this is already transforming into a religion,
google for Roko's basilisk.
Also the plot of Frank Herbert's Destination
On 3/25/2015 1:15 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com mailto:allco...@gmail.com
wrote:
John is inconsistent... he asserts that theory for duplication machines,
and so
say that he can never say anything about his future expectations because
On 26 March 2015 at 09:15, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
John is inconsistent... he asserts that theory for duplication machines,
and so say that he can never say anything about his future expectations
because he is no
On 3/25/2015 2:05 PM, John Clark wrote:
PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com mailto:te...@telmomenezes.com
wrote:
What is our disagreement here exactly? You just seem to dislike my lack
of reverence for Watson.
I have no problem when people point out that Watson can't perform task
On 3/25/2015 9:15 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2015-03-25 16:35 GMT+01:00 Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com
mailto:stath...@gmail.com:
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
mailto:allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-25 12:25 GMT+01:00 Quentin
On 26 March 2015 at 09:15, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-25 21:08 GMT+01:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 3/25/2015 9:15 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
No, there are as many (same) conscious moments as there are instances
running in realtime on the physical substrate
2015-03-25 21:08 GMT+01:00 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 3/25/2015 9:15 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2015-03-25 16:35 GMT+01:00 Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com:
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-25 12:25 GMT+01:00 Quentin
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
John is inconsistent... he asserts that theory for duplication machines,
and so say that he can never say anything about his future expectations
because he is no more... but somehow he can when he talks about MWI... go
figure.
2015-03-25 21:15 GMT+01:00 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
John is inconsistent... he asserts that theory for duplication machines,
and so say that he can never say anything about his future expectations
because he is no
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:15 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
John is inconsistent... he asserts that theory for duplication machines,
and so say that he can never say anything about his future expectations
because he
PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
What is our disagreement here exactly? You just seem to dislike my lack
of reverence for Watson.
I have no problem when people point out that Watson can't perform task X,
but it makes me nuts when they say Watson accomplished task X much better
This could be just thye benevolent dictator we need to sort out the planet
we're ruining.
I for one welcome our silicon based overlords...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
On 3/25/2015 2:09 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Human-level intelligence seems to depend on much more complex interconnections between
algorithms. I suspect that this level of complexity cannot be designed by humans
directly, so I agree with you that we will probably need algorithms that evolve more
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
MWI postulates that all outcomes of an experiment occur, whether they
involve interference effects or not.
According to Quantum Mechanics depending on circumstances sometimes you get
interference and sometimes you don't, and we're
On 3/25/2015 3:38 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
MWI postulates that all outcomes of an experiment occur, whether they
involve
interference effects or not.
According to Quantum Mechanics depending on
2015-03-25 11:53 GMT+01:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
That's the capsule theory of identity in a capsule, as it were. The MWI
and comp both lead to it - each observer moment is only connected to the
others by the contents of your memory. Otherwise you're like Memento man.
Yes, but the previous
That's the capsule theory of identity in a capsule, as it were. The MWI and
comp both lead to it - each observer moment is only connected to the others
by the contents of your memory. Otherwise you're like Memento man.
On 25 March 2015 at 19:23, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 25
Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le 25 mars 2015 07:27, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
mailto:allco...@gmail.com a écrit :
Le 25 mars 2015 07:23, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net a écrit :
On 3/24/2015 11:18 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le 25 mars 2015 05:08,
2015-03-25 12:09 GMT+01:00 Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au:
Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le 25 mars 2015 07:27, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com mailto:
allco...@gmail.com a écrit :
Le 25 mars 2015 07:23, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:
meeke...@verizon.net a écrit :
On
2015-03-25 12:25 GMT+01:00 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com:
2015-03-25 12:09 GMT+01:00 Bruce Kellett bhkell...@optusnet.com.au:
Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Le 25 mars 2015 07:27, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com mailto:
allco...@gmail.com a écrit :
Le 25 mars 2015 07:23, meekerdb
http://www.raqqa-sl.com/en/?p=857
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send
36 matches
Mail list logo
