On 3/3/2013 12:37 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi,
When Bruno claims that physics can be derived from the UD, would a
proof of that represent, on some level, a (partial) solution to the
measure problem?
Terren
--
Hi Terren,
It would seem so, or more accurately the other-way around. I just
On 02 Mar 2013, at 21:58, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/2/2013 1:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2013, at 20:37, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/1/2013 8:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2013, at 16:28, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/1/2013 7:13 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Feb 2013, at 20:29,
On Sunday, March 3, 2013 2:56:18 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
It's still random.
No, it isn't. If it were, then his book would be about the Neuronal
Basis
for The Illusion of Free Will.
The roles of efficient causation and final causation in the double aspect
theory of mind
The double aspect theory of mind considers the brain and its actions according
to two aspects, the brain and the mind. There is no assignment of causation,
there is only correlation.
Leibniz's metaphysics,
Hi Stephen,
That's a nice read but written under the materialist assumption so doesn't
really apply to my question.
Terren
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 3/3/2013 12:37 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi,
When Bruno claims that physics can be
On 03 Mar 2013, at 01:46, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/2/2013 1:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Mar 2013, at 21:02, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/1/2013 9:20 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
In physics we sometimes get big numbers, like 10^88 or 10^120,
but we never need 10^120 + 1.
But physics is no more
On 03 Mar 2013, at 06:37, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi,
When Bruno claims that physics can be derived from the UD, would a
proof of that represent, on some level, a (partial) solution to the
measure problem?
Yes. UDA gives the large shape (cf Plato versus Aristotle), and the
translation in
Questions. In your opinion, are Leibniz's monads individual thoughts, are
the just another word for the soul, the who thing wrapped up together? How
do these monads become part of the human brain? Are they generated by the
brain, or do they emit out of some Platonic realm, to activate the
On 3/2/2013 11:56 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
So you admit that what you say contradicts the fact that you are
intentionally saying it?
Intentional, as far as I can understand its use in philosophy, is
more or less equivalent to mental or conscious. You seem to take
it as an a priori fact
On 3/3/2013 10:11 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi Stephen,
That's a nice read but written under the materialist assumption so
doesn't really apply to my question.
Terren
Hi Terren,
Hummm, I can translate it in my mind over to the dual...
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Stephen P.
On Sunday, March 3, 2013 2:35:10 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 3/2/2013 11:56 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
So you admit that what you say contradicts the fact that you are
intentionally saying it?
Intentional, as far as I can understand its use in philosophy, is
more or less
Mitch,
My opinion is that monads are everywhere at a density of 10^90/cc,
and they precipitated out of space in the big bang
http://yanniru.blogspot.com/2013/
Richard
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:46 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Questions. In your opinion, are Leibniz's monads individual thoughts,
In a message dated 3/3/2013 3:30:06 PM Eastern Standard Time,
yann...@gmail.com writes:
Mitch,
My opinion is that monads are everywhere at a density of 10^90/cc,
and they precipitated out of space in the big bang
http://yanniru.blogspot.com/2013/
Richard
Thanks, Richard. So you view
Ok, maybe I'm missing something but I'm not sure how a paper that assumes
physics can say anything about how physics might emerge from arithmetic.
On Mar 3, 2013 2:49 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 3/3/2013 10:11 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
Hi Stephen,
That's a nice read
Richard, a very good paper you have there. The Mindspace recording
mechanism you invoked sounds exactly like the Hindu akashic records feature to
their religion. For people like myself, you'd need to expand on the particular
physics of the recording, such as what is analogous to the
On 3/3/2013 3:43 PM, Terren Suydam wrote:
Ok, maybe I'm missing something but I'm not sure how a paper that
assumes physics can say anything about how physics might emerge from
arithmetic.
Check out this paper: http://boole.stanford.edu/pub/ratmech.pdf
On Mar 3, 2013 2:49 PM, Stephen
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
I could easily think of evidence that would convince me, for example,
that the moon landing was a hoax, but no conceivable evidence would
have any bearing on the fact that everything is either determined or
random,
On Sunday, March 3, 2013 6:54:27 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I could easily think of evidence that would convince me, for example,
that the moon landing was a hoax, but no conceivable evidence would
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:00 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Richard, a very good paper you have there. The Mindspace recording mechanism
you invoked sounds exactly like the Hindu akashic records feature to their
religion. For people like myself, you'd need to expand on the particular
physics of
Well if what emerges from comp is not physics, then physics refutes comp.
So that means that you can use physics to say what comp must emerge.
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Terren Suydam terren.suy...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, maybe I'm missing something but I'm not sure how a paper that assumes
On 3/3/2013 8:17 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Well if what emerges from comp is not physics, then physics refutes comp.
So that means that you can use physics to say what comp must emerge.
what is proposed is that both comp and physics are co-emergent and
co-defining. Neither is
Supports my view of sense, Invalidates mechanistic assumptions about eyes.
The genie about the reality of sense just doesn't seem to want to stay in
the bottle...
Craig
http://www.newswise.com/articles/ectopic-eyes-function-without-connection-to-brain
*Experiments with tadpoles show ectopic
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think you *can* conceive of a third option. I think you're
just saying you can, like saying that you can conceive of a four-sided
triangle.
I don't have to conceive of a third option, my will embodies it.
On Sunday, March 3, 2013 11:02:02 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I don't think you *can* conceive of a third option. I think you're
just saying you can, like saying that you can conceive of a four-sided
24 matches
Mail list logo
