On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 1:36:58 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
I would never claim there is no relationship between numbers and
geometry, I claim that there is no function which geometry serves for
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
I would never claim there is no relationship between numbers and
geometry, I claim that there is no function which geometry serves for
arithmetic.
Pythagoras discovered and proved his famous theorem using geometry, only
later
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 11:58:01 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no mathematical justification for geometry though that I can
think of.
There are ways that numbers can describe geometry and ways that
geometry can describe numbers.
Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no mathematical justification for geometry though that I can
think of.
There are ways that numbers can describe geometry and ways that
geometry can describe numbers. What more do you need?
A reason that there could possibly be a
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
There is no mathematical justification for geometry though that I can
think of.
There are ways that numbers can describe geometry and ways that geometry
can describe numbers. What more do you need?
So the fact that
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 3:43:03 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
There is no mathematical justification for geometry though that I can
think of.
There are ways that numbers can describe geometry
On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:15:48 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
I do know that over the past year you have told this list that
information does not exist, and neither do electrons or time or space or
bits or even
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
I do know that over the past year you have told this list that
information does not exist, and neither do electrons or time or space or
bits or even logic, so I don't see why the nonexistence of movement in a
comp universe or any
On Saturday, November 10, 2012 12:15:59 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:wrote:
If numbers exist then so does geometry, that is to say numbers can be
made to change in ways that exactly corresponds with the way objects move
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
If numbers exist then so does geometry, that is to say numbers can be
made to change in ways that exactly corresponds with the way objects move
and rotate in space.
I'm saying that there would be no such thing as objects,
On 09 Nov 2012, at 01:54, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, November 8, 2012 2:57:35 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Nov 2012, at 19:04, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 10:49:35 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
On 07 Nov 2012, at 13:42, Craig Weinberg
On Thursday, November 8, 2012 11:36:18 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Can anyone explain why geometry/topology would exist in a comp universe?
If numbers exist then so does geometry, that is to say
:20
Subject: Re: Arithmetic doesn't even suggest geometry, let alone awareness.
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 10:49:04 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
I don't really know, but one starts with one point (a number ?)
then two points to form a line, then rotation of that line
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 8:19:03 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Craig,
Comp is not false, IMHO, it is just looked as through a very limited
window. It's notion of truth is what occurs in the limit of an infinite
number of mutually agreeing observers. 1+1=2 has no
On Thursday, November 8, 2012 2:57:35 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Nov 2012, at 19:04, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 10:49:35 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Nov 2012, at 13:42, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Can anyone explain why
On 11/8/2012 7:42 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 8:19:03 AM UTC-5, Stephen
Paul King wrote:
Hi Craig,
Comp is not false, IMHO, it is just looked as through a very
limited window. It's notion of truth is what occurs in the limit
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
Can anyone explain why geometry/topology would exist in a comp universe?
If numbers exist then so does geometry, that is to say numbers can be made
to change in ways that exactly corresponds with the way objects move
Can anyone explain why geometry/topology would exist in a comp universe?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/GpiggMAKD74J.
To post to this
On 11/7/2012 7:42 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Can anyone explain why geometry/topology would exist in a comp universe?
--
Hi Craig,
So far it seems that there is only a singular set of countable
recursive functions (or equivalent) and thus a single Boolean algebra
for the Universal
, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-11-07, 07:42:18
Subject: Arithmetic doesn't even suggest geometry, let alone awareness.
Can anyone explain why geometry/topology would exist
On 07 Nov 2012, at 13:42, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Can anyone explain why geometry/topology would exist in a comp
universe?
The execution of the UD cab be shown to be emulated (in Turing sense)
by the arithmetical relation (even by the degree four diophantine
polynomial). This contains all
, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-11-07, 07:42:18
Subject: Arithmetic doesn't even suggest geometry, let alone awareness.
Can anyone explain why geometry/topology would exist
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 10:49:35 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Nov 2012, at 13:42, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Can anyone explain why geometry/topology would exist in a comp
universe?
The execution of the UD cab be shown to be emulated (in Turing sense)
by the
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 10:58:12 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
According to Kant, the fundamentals or primitives of spacetime objects
are the two fundamental (inextended) intuitions:
1) a sliver of time alone (showing when something happens)
and 2) a frame of
On 11/7/2012 10:24 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 8:19:03 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
On 11/7/2012 7:42 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Can anyone explain why geometry/topology would exist in a comp
universe?
--
Hi Craig,
So far it
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 6:50:03 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
On 11/7/2012 10:24 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 8:19:03 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
On 11/7/2012 7:42 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Can anyone explain why geometry/topology
On 11/7/2012 8:18 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 6:50:03 PM UTC-5, Stephen Paul King wrote:
On 11/7/2012 10:24 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 8:19:03 AM UTC-5, Stephen Paul
King wrote:
On 11/7/2012 7:42 AM, Craig
On 07 Nov 2012, at 19:04, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 10:49:35 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 Nov 2012, at 13:42, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Can anyone explain why geometry/topology would exist in a comp
universe?
The execution of the UD cab be shown to be
28 matches
Mail list logo