From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2015 8:07 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Idiot Test
On 14 Aug 2015, at 23:21, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote
From: marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Idiot Test
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:27:29 +0200
On 13 Aug 2015, at 13:15, Kim Jones wrote:
OK - so the inability to be sure if someone is an idiot is just as
fraught as trying to be sure that they are intelligent, I
On 14 Aug 2015, at 23:21, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:
From: Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: Idiot Test
Idiocy only ever applies to other people
explained by
Chaotic Inflation. Easy peasy.
-Original Message-
From: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, Aug 14, 2015 1:42 pm
Subject: Re: Idiot Test
I am curious you
point in the enterprise of exploring
the terrain of consciousness.
The Idiot Test is a cynical exercise, you seemed to have missed that. It's a
cartoon in words designed to focus on something sinister; either a lie or a
form of stupidity. A thought bubble as we say nowadays. Just one grade better
Inflation. Easy peasy.
-Original Message-
From: 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, Aug 14, 2015 1:42 pm
Subject: Re: Idiot Test
I am curious you seem to speak of idiots
From: spudboy100 via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: Idiot Test
Chris, when you can think of politicians and actors of your political
preference, who behave idiotically
From: Kim Jones kimjo...@ozemail.com.au
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: Idiot Test
Idiocy only ever applies to other people, yes. It's like sexual perversion and
corruption; these things
On 8/14/2015 2:11 PM, Kim Jones wrote:
Idiocy only ever applies to other people, yes. It's like sexual perversion and
corruption; these things are done only by others, never by me! Why I speak of the need
for some fabled 'test' - a bit like Alice drinking from the bottle marked 'drink me'.
@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 6:12 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Idiot Test
I simply feel it is hard to identify idiocy when it hits closer to home. In
fact, as I stated, holding a certain position or opinion may not, in fact be
idiotic at all. I sometimes feel
everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, Aug 14, 2015 5:17 pm
Subject: Re: Idiot Test
From: spudboy100 via Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 12:39 PM
Subject: Re
ignorant that we would have been able to conceive
before.
Bruno
Well, that’s it, surely. The Idiot Test administered in this way has as a
basic assumption that only what might be called The True Public Idiot is by
nature incapable of changing or modifying his stated beliefs. A hallmark
On 13 Aug 2015, at 01:06, chris peck wrote:
Here's a thread with all the list's alpha-male geniuses mocking
someone. Here's me, the village idiot, convinced they all pass their
own idiot test with flying colours. lol.
Looks you are the one mocking others, ... lol.
I mean if the test
more, and to recognize we are more ignorant that we would
have been able to conceive before.
Bruno
Well, that’s it, surely. The Idiot Test administered in this way
has as a basic assumption that only what might be called The True
Public Idiot is by nature incapable of changing
new, it
just shows reasons to doubt more, and to recognize we are more
ignorant that we would have been able to conceive before.
Bruno
Well, that’s it, surely. The Idiot Test administered in this way
has as a basic assumption that only what might be called The True
Public Idiot
missed the message
From: marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Idiot Test
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 15:27:29 +0200
On 13 Aug 2015, at 13:15, Kim Jones wrote:
OK - so the inability to be sure if someone is an idiot is just as fraught as
trying to be sure
to this as 'baseline
consciousness'. It is merely a starting point in the enterprise of exploring
the terrain of consciousness.
The Idiot Test is a cynical exercise, you seemed to have missed that. It's a
cartoon in words designed to focus on something sinister; either a lie or a
form of stupidity
Here's a thread with all the list's alpha-male geniuses mocking someone. Here's
me, the village idiot, convinced they all pass their own idiot test with flying
colours. lol.
I mean if the test involves understanding the implications of psychedelic drugs
then you all just failed to do
can't use!!!
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
-Original Message-
From: chris peck chris_peck...@hotmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 12, 2015 07:06 PM
Subject: RE: Idiot Test
div id=AOLMsgPart_2_5295ac28-3689-4288-b9f4-76631c0cb089
style scoped
, it just shows reasons to
doubt more, and to recognize we are more ignorant that we would
have been able to conceive before.
Bruno
Well, that’s it, surely. The Idiot Test administered in this way has
as a basic assumption that only what might be called The True Public
Idiot is by nature
, and to
recognize we are more ignorant that we would have been able to conceive
before.
Bruno
Well, that’s it, surely. The Idiot Test administered in this way has as a basic
assumption that only what might be called The True Public Idiot is by nature
incapable of changing or modifying his stated
Oh I'd enjoy that test! :) But I'd enjoy even more administering it to John
Clarke. I suspect I already know the result however.
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 10:09:42 AM UTC+10, Kim Jones wrote:
OK - perhaps this post is not entirely serious. I don't actually know.
There appears to be no
On 11 Aug 2015, at 02:09, Kim Jones wrote:
OK - perhaps this post is not entirely serious. I don't actually know.
There appears to be no reliable test of idiocy. Even people who
invite others to participate in games of running along a lawn while
a drone fires rockets at them may not
On 11 Aug 2015, at 10:55, Pierz wrote:
Oh I'd enjoy that test! :) But I'd enjoy even more administering it
to John Clarke. I suspect I already know the result however.
I agree, but it is not entirely obvious, as I think John C does not
lie to himself, only to us.
Sometimes, I am not sure
On 12 Aug 2015, at 9:42 am, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
If you think you have a sure fire way to identify an idiot...it's you.
Brent
You, sir - are no one’s idiot.
Kim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To
of ...
atheism (the non agnostic one 'course). Not that it makes you believe in anything new,
it just shows reasons to doubt more, and to recognize we are more ignorant that we
would have been able to conceive before.
Bruno
Well, that’s it, surely. The Idiot Test administered in this way has
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Pierz pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh I'd enjoy that test! :) But I'd enjoy even more administering it to
John Clarke. I suspect I already know the result however.
Idiot or not at least John Clark knows how to spell his last name.
John K Clark
--
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 10:51:37 AM UTC+10, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Pierz pie...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Oh I'd enjoy that test! :) But I'd enjoy even more administering it to
John Clarke. I suspect I already know the result however.
OK - perhaps this post is not entirely serious. I don't actually know.
There appears to be no reliable test of idiocy. Even people who invite others
to participate in games of running along a lawn while a drone fires rockets at
them may not actually qualify, ultimately, as idiots.
It may be
29 matches
Mail list logo
