> On 9 Jan 2019, at 07:58, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 11:37:13 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 2:52:27 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com <> wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, January 6, 2019 at 10:45:01 PM UTC, Bruce wrote:
> On
On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 11:07:51 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 9 Jan 2019, at 07:58, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 11:37:13 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 2:52:27 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 9 Jan 2019, at 15:13, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 4:06:08 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 6 Jan 2019, at 22:27, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Why - in numerical reality (UD) - can't there be vampires, werewolves,
>> that sort of things?
> On 10 Jan 2019, at 07:39, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 6:49:05 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:38 AM John Clark > wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 5:01 PM Bruce Kellett > wrote:
>
> > Rubbish. The fine structure constant is not computabl
> On 9 Jan 2019, at 11:20, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 9:44:40 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 6 Jan 2019, at 15:20, Philip Thrift > wrote:
>>
>>
>> In terms of processing, I distinguish experience processing from information
>> processing.
>
>
> OK.
On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 7:36:33 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 9 Jan 2019, at 15:13, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 4:06:08 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6 Jan 2019, at 22:27, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>> Why - in numerical rea
On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 12:16:33 PM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 7:36:33 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9 Jan 2019, at 15:13, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 4:06:08 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 11:20:20 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 9 Jan 2019, at 11:20, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 9:44:40 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6 Jan 2019, at 15:20, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>> In terms of processing, I
On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 11:07:51 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 9 Jan 2019, at 07:58, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 11:37:13 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 2:52:27 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 11:07:51 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 9 Jan 2019, at 07:58, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 11:37:13 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 2:52:27 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 4:01:46 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:53 AM John Clark > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:58 PM Philip Thrift > > wrote:
>>
>> >> Is the Fine Structure Constant a rational number? Is it a algebraic
number? Is it a transcendental num
On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 8:49:41 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:36 PM John Clark > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:49 PM Bruce Kellett > > wrote:
>>
>> >>The following 2012 article in Physical Review letters describes a QED
calculation involving 12,672 tent
Interesting articles.
Brent
Forwarded Message
Another rebuttal:
https://www.hpcwire.com/2019/01/09/the-case-against-the-case-against-quantum-computing/
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 1:57 PM :
In the IEEE Spectrum last week, Mikhail Dyakonov presented his overview of the
field:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:53 PM Bruce Kellett wrote:
> > *There is no theoretical value".*
>
>From a book on spectrography by Norman Ramsey discussing the lamb Shift,
the very thing that led to the discovery of the Fine Structure Constant in
the first place:
"*The atomic hydrogen hyperfine sep
On 1/10/2019 4:21 PM, John Clark wrote:
/So even Feynman knew that there was no theoretical value for the
FSC, alpha./
No, he knew very well there was a theory that could come up with a
value because his own Feynman Diagrams could do it. But what he didn't
know and what nobody kno
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:18 PM Brent Meeker wrote:
> On 1/10/2019 4:21 PM, John Clark wrote:
>
> *So even Feynman knew that there was no theoretical value for the FSC,
>> alpha.*
>>
>
> No, he knew very well there was a theory that could come up with a value
> because his own Feynman Diagrams
16 matches
Mail list logo