Thanks for telling me Telmo,
Have a good day,
Bruno
On 22 Jun 2010, at 11:42, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Ok, nothing to add. I fully agree with what you say.
Best,
Telmo.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
Hi Telmo,
I'm having a hard time understanding this
Hi Bruno,
Ok, nothing to add. I fully agree with what you say.
Best,
Telmo.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Hi Telmo,
>
>
>
> I'm having a hard time understanding this particular statement:
>
>
>
> "The lobian error is that prohibition at the start deprive its target
Hi Telmo,
I'm having a hard time understanding this particular statement:
"The lobian error is that prohibition at the start deprive its
target of its responsibility. Eventually it dissolves
irresponsibility in a unsustainable economical pyramidal power
which can only crash. Better t
On 21 Jun 2010, at 12:43, Rabbi Rabbit wrote:
Dear Bruno,
I am learning something very valuable from this experience. I think
that, coming from different backgrounds, if we want to have an
exchange of ideas we need to create a common language.
My lack of a common language with you prevents me
Dear Bruno,
I am learning something very valuable from this experience. I think
that, coming from different backgrounds, if we want to have an
exchange of ideas we need to create a common language.
My lack of a common language with you prevents me to follow you
through your argumentations. I sens
Dear Marty and George,
I answer you together since you had some questions about translation.
Regarding your question, Marty, I think you should embrace whatever
interpretation of Exodus 3,14 that is most meaningful to you. Maybe,
as you suggest, God could identify with Frank Sinatra singing "I fa
Hi Bruno,
Thank you for the detailed response. I was aware of most arguments up until
the self-referential machine part and, of course, agree with them. That part
I'm still digesting, although I believe I understand most of your argument
there.
I'm having a hard time understanding this particular
Hi Telmo,
Nobody knows logic. Marijuana illegality, and the whole prohibition
politics are based on error in the most elementary part of logic.
And formal logic, a branch of mathematics, is virtually known only
by professional logicians.
Sorry if this is off-topic, but I would love to
Hi rand,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 8:56 AM, r wrote:
> I'm not Bruno but here's my take:
>
> 1. The demands of those who use addictive/habituating substances are
> without limit.
>
Surely that's not true? There is a finite amount of people with a finite
amount of time to consume drugs.
> 2. The
I'm not Bruno but here's my take:
1. The demands of those who use addictive/habituating substances are without
limit.
2. There is a finite limit to the number of attempts possible to deter
supply shipments.
3. Such attempts will always fall short as the futile waste of money/time
which they are.
4
Hi John
Thanks for your appreciation.
John Mikes wrote:
Dear George,
I was missing more of your contributions on this list lately (years?).
Let me reflect to a few of your topics:
*Chaos.*
A decade or so ago I was named 'resident chaotician' on another list -
later changed my mind when I wa
Dear Rabbi
Rabbi Rabbit wrote:
What is
surprising about Abulafia is that he did not reach this state by
suppressing his conscious mind, as most mystics do by repetition of a
single formula/mantra, but by overstimulating it with letter
combinations accompanied by body motions.
Too much informa
Hi Bruno,
> Nobody knows logic. Marijuana illegality, and the whole prohibition
> politics are based on error in the most elementary part of logic. And formal
> logic, a branch of mathematics, is virtually known only by professional
> logicians.
>
>
Sorry if this is off-topic, but I would love to
On 18 Jun 2010, at 17:03, Rabbi Rabbit wrote:
Dear George,
Thank you for your beautiful interpretation of B'reshit (Book of
Genesis).
By your description, I have the feeling that you think about Sefirotic
Kabbalah. Briefly, Sefirotic Kabbalah believes that God emanated in 10
Sefirot (the mean
inclined to say:"I am
what I amget used to it." Or with Popeye: "I yam what I yam and
that's all that I yam." What do you think?m.a.
- Original Message -
From: "Rabbi Rabbit"
To: "Everything List"
Sent: Friday, Jun
ongruent with your
"consciousness filters out the world from chaos".
I still feel that R.Rabbit would add more content to 'God' than just
consciousness. (Cf: Bruno's 'Theos').
John M
On 6/17/10, George Levy wrote:
>
> Hi Rabbi Rabbit.
>
>
Dear George,
Thank you for your beautiful interpretation of B'reshit (Book of
Genesis).
By your description, I have the feeling that you think about Sefirotic
Kabbalah. Briefly, Sefirotic Kabbalah believes that God emanated in 10
Sefirot (the meaning of the word is unclear, the root "Seper" is
re
Dear John,
In Kabbalah letters are numbers and vice versa.
Regarding your question of what is the meaning of the Name of God, if
you ask me, I think it is meaningless. It is pure, full presence. It
is up to us to predicate something out of it and to turn it
meaningful. Due to its claim of totalit
Dear Bruno,
Let me answer a few of your remarks.
> Nobody knows logic. Marijuana illegality, and the whole prohibition
> politics are based on error in the most elementary part of logic. And
> formal logic, a branch of mathematics, is virtually known only by
> professional logicians.
I thi
Hi Rabbi Rabbit.
Welcome
I haven't contributed to this list for a while but I have been reading it.
Here is a possible connection between the Kabbalah and the Multiverse,
which I will describe in a bulleted fashion for brevity.
The initial chaos, "Tohu va Bohu," (from which
On 16 Jun 2010, at 01:04, Rabbi Rabbit wrote:
Dear Bruno,
Thank you for your ample and generous answer.
I want to play with my cards on the table and I take as a rule not to
pretend to understand what I do not understand.
That is a good idea, especially if you want understand.
I must c
Dear R.Rabbit,
thanks for the consideret reply and your willingness to expand your domain
into relations with other domaines. You see, we are already in trouble with
22 letters (never mind 27, or the mathematical operator battle) about ONLY
the NAME of God. What is in a name? whatever callers like
Dear Jason,
My assumption is that the Name of God, according to Abraham Abulafia,
could be made of any possible combination of the 22 letters, as long
as this name does not exceed 22 characters. This includes repetitions
of letters and any combination between 1 and 22 characters.
Thank you for yo
Rabbi Rabbit,
Forgive me if I missed this elsewhere in your posts, but is there the
assumption somewhere that the name of God is 22 Hebrew letters long? If
that is the case and some letters may be missing and others repeated, then
you are correct about there being 22^22 combinations. If every le
Oh, bad, bad computer.
In my previous post where it is written "" please read 22 raised
to the 22th power (base 22, exponent 22). No HTML posting here, I'll
need to take it into account!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To
Dear John,
I feel most at home in a list about our ignorance! Thank you and Bruno
for the warm welcome.
Regarding your question, the wonderful thing is that we both are
right. The Hebrew alphabet has 22 and 27 letters. There you are, an
example of the multiverse! Not either-or, but both-and!
The
Dear Bruno,
Thank you for your ample and generous answer.
I want to play with my cards on the table and I take as a rule not to
pretend to understand what I do not understand. I must confess you
that your answer was for me as promising as it was obscure.
I'll try to break down my doubts.
> Ah!
Hi, Rabbi Rabbit, welcome to our 'list about our ignorance'.
You wrote about "ALL 22 letters of the Hebrew alphabet (Babel)" so I clicked
(as is my habbit) Google for Hebrew alphabet and found 27 letters.
Also: texts I bounce into from Israeli sources look different from those
images reproduced in
Hi Rabbi Rabbit, welcome,
I entered to your discussion list from the back door. I am not a
scientist or a philosopher, but a graduate student researching
Kabbalah, popularly known as Jewish mysticism.
We talk a lot about Plotinus in this list, and it is known that
Kabbalah is related to Pla
Dear all,
I entered to your discussion list from the back door. I am not a
scientist or a philosopher, but a graduate student researching
Kabbalah, popularly known as Jewish mysticism.
As others here, I knew about this site through "The Theory of
Everything". I landed on the this book through Bor
30 matches
Mail list logo
