On Friday, July 25, 2014 9:15:10 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Jul 2014, at 04:32, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:36:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM
On 25 Jul 2014, at 17:07, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 21:21, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig
On 23 Jul 2014, at 21:21, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
PGC,
I am not being critical of Bruno. I just do not
On 24 Jul 2014, at 04:32, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:36:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
PGC,
I am not being critical of Bruno. I just do not understand
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 21:21, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
PGC,
I am not being critical of Bruno. I just do not understand what he
is saying.
My understanding is that if comp is correct, it is both 3p and 1p
correct.
Bruno's argument to
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
PGC,
I am not being critical of Bruno. I just do not understand what he is
saying.
My understanding is
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:36:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
PGC,
I am not being critical of Bruno. I just do not understand what he is
saying.
My understanding is that
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Craig,
You still talk like if I pretended that computationalism is true. I don't
do that, ever.
But you *do* pretend that computationalism
PGC,
I am not being critical of Bruno. I just do not understand what he is
saying.
My understanding is that if comp is correct, it is both 3p and 1p correct.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Richard
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM UTC-4, yanniru wrote:
PGC,
I am not being critical of Bruno. I just do not understand what he is
saying.
My understanding is that if comp is correct, it is both 3p and 1p correct.
Bruno's argument to me has been that comp is not correct in 1p. When I
On 18 Jul 2014, at 14:42, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, July 18, 2014 4:10:47 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
With the TOE elementary arithmetic (predicate logic + RA axioms),
the input are numbers, and they obey the laws of addition and
multiplication. They make more sense according
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:20, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:22:46 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Jul 2014, at 15:05, Craig Weinberg wrote:
So much of our attention in logic and math is focused on using
processes to turn specific inputs into even more specific
On Thursday, July 17, 2014 4:25:07 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:20, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:22:46 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Jul 2014, at 15:05, Craig Weinberg wrote:
So much of our attention in logic and math is focused
On 16 Jul 2014, at 15:05, Craig Weinberg wrote:
So much of our attention in logic and math is focused on using
processes to turn specific inputs into even more specific binary
outputs. Very little attention is paid to what inputs and outputs
are or to the understanding of what truth is in
On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:22:46 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Jul 2014, at 15:05, Craig Weinberg wrote:
So much of our attention in logic and math is focused on using processes
to turn specific inputs into even more specific binary outputs. Very little
attention is paid to
16 matches
Mail list logo
