On 24.10.2012 20:31 meekerdb said the following:
On 10/24/2012 5:31 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
http://www.frontiersin.org/Perception_Science/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00390/abstract
Comments?
Woo-woo. Small effect sizes which are *statistically* significant
are indicative of bias errors. I'd
On 25 Oct 2012, at 17:55, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
But I don not mean such kind of anticipation. such anticipation by
gathering information and computation is a fundamental activity of
living beings.
OK.
I refer to adivination. I suppose that a definition of
adivination is the
On 24 Oct 2012, at 19:25, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
2012/10/24 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 24 Oct 2012, at 14:31, Stephen P. King wrote:
http://www.frontiersin.org/Perception_Science/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00390/abstract
Comments?
If verified it might confirms Helmholtz intuition
On 24 Oct 2012, at 19:31, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
I dont believe that such genuine anticipation is possible, for a
simple reason: If for quantum or relativistic means the mind or the
brain could genuinely anticipate anything, this would be such a huge
advantage, that this hability would
But I don not mean such kind of anticipation. such anticipation by
gathering information and computation is a fundamental activity of
living beings. I refer to adivination. I suppose that a definition of
adivination is the anticipation of something for which we have no
conscious or unconscious
On 10/25/2012 9:25 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Oct 2012, at 19:31, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
I dont believe that such genuine anticipation is possible, for a
simple reason: If for quantum or relativistic means the mind or the
brain could genuinely anticipate anything, this would be such a
On 10/25/2012 11:55 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
But I don not mean such kind of anticipation. such anticipation by
gathering information and computation is a fundamental activity of
living beings. I refer to adivination. I suppose that a definition of
adivination is the anticipation of
At the risk of beating a dead horse, Cramer's Transactional Interpretation of
Quantum Mechanics TIQM, a 4th possible interpetation of QM, requires waves
coming back from the future.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation More
recently he [Cramer] has also argued TIQM to be
On 24 Oct 2012, at 14:31, Stephen P. King wrote:
http://www.frontiersin.org/Perception_Science/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00390/abstract
Comments?
If verified it might confirms Helmholtz intuition that perception is
unconscious anticipation.
It would be the Dt of the Bp Dt. It is natural
2012/10/24 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 24 Oct 2012, at 14:31, Stephen P. King wrote:
http://www.frontiersin.org/**Perception_Science/10.3389/**
fpsyg.2012.00390/abstracthttp://www.frontiersin.org/Perception_Science/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00390/abstract
Comments?
If verified it
I dont believe that such genuine anticipation is possible, for a simple
reason: If for quantum or relativistic means the mind or the brain could
genuinely anticipate anything, this would be such a huge advantage, that
this hability would be inherited genetically by everyone of us, every human
On 10/24/2012 10:04 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
At the risk of beating a dead horse, Cramer's Transactional Interpretation of
Quantum Mechanics TIQM, a 4th possible interpetation of QM, requires waves
coming back from the future.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation More
On 10/24/2012 5:31 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
http://www.frontiersin.org/Perception_Science/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00390/abstract
Comments?
Woo-woo. Small effect sizes which are *statistically* significant are indicative of bias
errors. I'd wager a proper Bayesian analysis of the original
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 10/24/2012 10:04 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
At the risk of beating a dead horse, Cramer's Transactional Interpretation
of
Quantum Mechanics TIQM, a 4th possible interpetation of QM, requires waves
coming back
14 matches
Mail list logo
