Re: [Evolution-hackers] UID in vCard

On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 21:06 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Mo, 2011-11-14 at 11:22 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 10:00 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > So I suggest to pursue the first approach instead. I think it is > > > possible for the file backend. > > > Is it also possib

Re: [Evolution-hackers] UID in vCard

On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 21:06 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Mo, 2011-11-14 at 11:22 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 10:00 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > So I suggest to pursue the first approach instead. I think it is > > > possible for the file backend. > > > Is it also possib

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Hot news from the Evo/WebKit Universe

ld be amusing. -- System & Network Administrator [ LPI & NCLA ] <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware Developer <http://www.opengroupware.us> Adam Tauno Williams ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Hot news from the Evo/WebKit Universe

ld be amusing. -- System & Network Administrator [ LPI & NCLA ] <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware Developer <http://www.opengroupware.us> Adam Tauno Williams ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit branch is ready

poser now. I > > have > > quite a lot of time till 3.6 and hopefully the composer won't take as much > > time as the reader did, so if things go well, we could kill GtkHtml for > > good > > in 3.6 after all :) > Wonderful!!! +1 +1 Your effort is apprec

Re: [Evolution-hackers] ActiveSync support for Evolution

On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 21:52 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > Since I've been using this "in anger" for my company email for the last > few months, and I haven't had cause to touch the code since the > beginning of December... I suppose it's about time I pulled my finger > out, called it a "release",

[Evolution-hackers] Bug#623066, Me, Evolution, & jhbuild

I'd like to test the changes regarding Bug#623066 and possibly others. Is there anything special I need to do to get jhbuild to create the correct version/branch of Evolution? Or, initially, can I achieve the correct version via jh?

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Bug#623066, Me, Evolution, & jhbuild

On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 09:24 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 09:38 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > I'd like to test the changes regarding Bug#623066 and possibly others. > > Is there anything special I need to do to get jhbuild to create the > >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Did 3.4 just get really slow?

On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:49 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote: > On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 11:25 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > Le vendredi 18 mai 2012 à 23:43 +0100, David Woodhouse a écrit : > > > I just updated to Fedora 17 and Evolution 3.4. > > > It seems to have just noticed that I archived a quarter's

Re: [Evolution-hackers] some api for memo ?

On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 19:23 +0200, Pierre-Yves Luyten wrote: > Hello, > Is there some API to play with evolution memos (vjournal) from another > application? > seems it's just .ics , but the VJOURNAL type is different than VTODO / > VEVENT > (The goal would be to have some note editor taking adv

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Return back folder remember for Open/Save dialog

On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 11:04 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 09:19 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 14:47 +0200, Milan Crha wrot > > Consistency with other GTK+ applications is more important. > > If GtkFileChooser has chosen a bad policy, try and open a d

Re: [Evolution-hackers] mail migration

On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 04:54 +0100, Sasa Ostrouska wrote: > Hi I know this is not direclty related to hacking on evolution, but I > would like to ask one advice. > I have about 5Gb of e-mails on my laptop which I use for work, and it > is still on evolution 2.26.3. > I would like to migrate now this

Re: [Evolution-hackers] mail migration

On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 23:29 +0100, Sasa Ostrouska wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Adam Tauno Williams > wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 04:54 +0100, Sasa Ostrouska wrote: > >> Hi I know this is not direclty related to hacking on evolution, but I > >>

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Required Evolution-code-help

I've never done it with Evolution / MAPI code. But generally that is what I would do to discover "how-the-*@&^&*&@-did-i-end-up-in-this-function". -- Adam Tauno Williams GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA ___

Re: [Evolution-hackers] The wiki is the new official homepage

onstellation of sites has been confusing even to me [a l-o-n-g time user]. > [1] http://blogs.gnome.org/mccann/2013/12/17/lets-face-it/ -- Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awill...@whitemice.org> GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python

Re: [Evolution-hackers] The wiki is the new official homepage

onstellation of sites has been confusing even to me [a l-o-n-g time user]. > [1] http://blogs.gnome.org/mccann/2013/12/17/lets-face-it/ -- Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awill...@whitemice.org> GPG D95ED383 OpenGroupware Developer <htt

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Sieve application for filtering mail [was: Re: Evolution custom email message]

n the server. If you are looking for a lexer/parser there is one implemented in C inside Cyrus IMAP's timsieved server - it parses and compiles the SIEVE scripts to byte-code when a user uploads/activates a script. <http://git.cyrusimap.org/cyrus-imapd/tree/timsieved> -- Adam Tauno Willi

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Developing a new protected message complement

event injection. A specific definition of that he means by "protected" is required. Protected as in legally verifiable [cryptographically signed] or protected as in keeping a call-center operator from just deleting everything? -- Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awill...@whitemice.org&g

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Congratulations to GSoC students!

Watson Yuuma Sato: PKCS#11 module Awesome! -- Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awill...@whitemice.org> GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your lis

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

ix its summary with [webkit-composer]. > > [0] - https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/log/?h=wip/webkit-composer > > [1] - http://ur1.ca/gvb12 -- Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awill...@whitemice.org> GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA ___

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Mailing list moderators wanted

se drop a short reply (and > explicitly CC me on it just to be on the safe side). I'm in. -- Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awill...@whitemice.org> GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA ___ evolution-hackers m

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Propper subject prefix when reply.

fault is '' [empty string] Not quite what you are looking for however.  I do not see any other parameters related to Subject of a reply. -- Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awill...@whitemice.org> GPG D95ED383 Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Support alternative concepts to organise mail communication?

On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 11:33 +0100, Anna Marei wrote: > Wouldn't this be great? > Maybe in a way Nylas https://www.nylas.com/nylas-mail/  now > Mailspring https://getmailspring.com/ does? > E.g. > - Single, unified inbox Honestly, I fail to see the point of that at all.  And - Evolution has that fe

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Nor “Answer to list”, nor “answer to all” make use of “Cc” …add “wide answer”?

> “reply in private to the list, outside of the knowledge of eventual > participants). The problem here is “reply to the list” is not the > canonical standard thing most people will want to do, it is just the > complementary opposite of “reply privately to the sender”: “reply > privately to the lis

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Plans for GroupDAV/CalDAV/CardDAV/plain WebDAV?

> I'd like to ask, what are the plans for supporting completely > GroupDAV / CalDAV / CardDAV / or simply > calendars/todo's/journals/contacts over plain WebDAV? > AFAIK the current stable version supports: > • CalDAV: now complete (calendar, todo, journal) (since 2.25) > • CardDAV: not implemented

Re: [Evolution-hackers] any point in server side indices?

On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 19:56 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > Cyrus has a facility to maintain indices on the server. > Will such indices help evolution? I believe that they will. certainly suggests that Evolution [Camel] utilizes IMAP SEARCH. And I search 1

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Thank you and question

On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 20:23 -0400, alex...@optonline.net wrote: > To the evolution team, > > I wanted to say thank you for putting together an awesome mail > program. I have been using it for a few years and will never use or > support Microsoft outlook again. > Now, i have a few questions that i

Re: [Evolution-hackers] MAPI support not even close... ?!?! Can I help?

> And second, because I figured developers would be happier about trying > to fix issues on the current master branch rather than do bugfixing and > development on the older branch. > > I want MAPI support to actually _work_ in Gnome 2.30. So you're the other one! Sometimes I feel like it is ju

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Moving from the single mbox file format for the local folders

> > I thought of bring this in this list to gather more opinions to choose > > the right one. The approach #2 seems a better one as we are choosing a > > way for storing the messages internally in evo. Are we missing to see > > anything while we choose the second one ? > > One advantage which I see

[Evolution-hackers] WebDAV Addressbook Debugging

s me to restart Evolution. Running Evolution from the command line doesn't provide any additional information. -- Adam Tauno Williams LPIC-1, Novell CLA <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware, Cyrus IMAPd, Postfix, OpenLDAP, Samba ___

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebDAV Addressbook Debugging

On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:25 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > I'm aware of the CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG and CALDAV_DEBUG environment > directives for debugging IMAP and CALDAV. Is there an equivalent for > WEBDAV addressbooks? > > I am testing Evo with our GroupDAV server a

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebDAV Addressbook Debugging

On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:37 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:25 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > I'm aware of the CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG and CALDAV_DEBUG environment > > directives for debugging IMAP and CALDAV. Is there an equivalent for >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebDAV Addressbook Debugging

On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 15:44 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 14:37 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:25 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > I'm aware of the CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG and CALDAV_DEBUG environment > &g

[Evolution-hackers] WebDAV Addressbook Comments

rbird the entire application was useless after the addressbook was loaded. -- Adam Tauno Williams ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebDAV Addressbook Debugging

On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 14:25 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:25 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > I am testing Evo with our GroupDAV server and after a moment it > responds > > with 'address book not available' and instructs me to restart > E

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebDAV Addressbook Debugging

On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 20:45 +0200, Butrus Damaskus wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Adam Tauno Williams > wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 14:25 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:25 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >> > I am tes

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebDAV Addressbook Comments

On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 06:37 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > 1. Every time one does a search of the address book the backend performs > a PROPFIND. This seems like overkill if the backend already has the > contents of the addressbook. In offline mode this doesn't happen, so

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebDAV Addressbook Comments

On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 06:37 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > 1. Every time one does a search of the address book the backend performs > a PROPFIND. This seems like overkill if the backend already has the > contents of the addressbook. In offline mode this doesn't happen, so

[Evolution-hackers] Confused by non-refreshing GET after CalDAV Put

, etc... BUT if I go forward one month, then back, and open the appointment the appointment has 'refreshed' and I see an appointment with myself as the attendee, etc... -- Adam Tauno Williams LPIC-1, Novell CLA <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com> OpenGroupware, C

[Evolution-hackers] Anyone using CalDAV ToDo Lists? (No URL/Priority values)

/15349830 URL:http://**/Tasks/view/15349830/History/ X-COILS-KIND:None X-COILS-PROJECT;X-COILS-PROJECT-ID=1025770: END:VTODO END:VCALENDAR I'm curious if other users see values from the server presented for tasks in the URL or PRIORITY fields? -- Adam Tauno Williams L

[Evolution-hackers] Anyone using CalDAV ToDo Lists? (No URL/Priority values)

/15349830 URL:http://**/Tasks/view/15349830/History/ X-COILS-KIND:None X-COILS-PROJECT;X-COILS-PROJECT-ID=1025770: END:VTODO END:VCALENDAR I'm curious if other users see values from the server presented for tasks in the URL or PRIORITY fields? -- Adam Tauno Williams L

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Anyone using CalDAV ToDo Lists? (No URL/Priority values)

On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 06:49 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > evolution-2.30.1.2-3.9.x86_64 > I extended our groupware server to support tasks over CalDAV. And I can > see the tasks in Evolution, but... > Evolution displays no URL or Priority for any task although these >

[Evolution-hackers] Memo CALDAV Query

When Evolution does the calendar-query on a collection for memos (vjournal) objects if specifies a time-range, like: Is this time range at all adjustable or configurable? I haven't found anything in the UI that seems to pertain to this - perhap

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memo CALDAV Query

On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 15:30 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 09:04 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > When Evolution does the calendar-query on a collection for memos > > (vjournal) objects if specifies a time-range, like: > > ... > > > &

Re: [Evolution-hackers] stable evolution for windows. real?

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:36 +0530, Akhil Laddha wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 16:47 +0300, Абдулахадов Айрат wrote: > > Hi! Has anyone some experience in using stable evolution on windows? Is > > it a good idea to try to use evolution on windows? > You can install current stable Evolution 2.32.1

[Evolution-hackers] Stale page @ projects.gnome.org

This page is quite stale. ___ evolution-hackers mailing list evolution-hackers@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hack

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution calendar backend

On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 10:57 -0600, Kirk Wolff wrote: > Hello, > I've been digging through calendar's webdav backend The calendar is CalDAV [it uses REPORT methods]; a descendant of WebDAV. > code and found that > there's special handling of calendar items (components) that have > the same UID.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Multiple child-addressbooks under an account

On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 19:49 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote: > On 01/21/2011 06:30 PM, Kirk Wolff wrote: > > Is there a way to add child-addressbooks under an addressbook account > > with evolution's GUI? I don't see any current implementations that have > > a 'tree' of addressbooks under an addressbook

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution calendar backend

On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 14:18 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 10:57 -0600, Kirk Wolff wrote: > > Hello, > > I've been digging through calendar's webdav backend > The calendar is CalDAV [it uses REPORT methods]; a descendant of WebDAV. > >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Multiple child-addressbooks under an account

On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 01:26 +, Kirk Wolff wrote: > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 14:23 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 19:49 +0100, Onyeibo Oku wrote: > > > On 01/21/2011 06:30 PM, Kirk Wolff wrote: > > > > Is there a way to add child-add

[Evolution-hackers] Hierarchical Tasks [Was: Multiple child-addressbooks under an account]

Please use Ctrl-L [reply-to-list] rather than Reply-All when replying to list messages. On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 15:50 +1000, Andrew McMillan wrote: > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 14:23 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > This really seems like a server-side issue to me. The issue really is >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Sqlite cache for address-book storage in EDS

On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 10:09 +0530, Chenthill Palanisamy wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > Okay, this might be a long shot but I'm gonna throw it out there anyway: > > would it make sense to look at using Xapian to index a directory of raw > > vCards? > Am not sure

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Sqlite cache for address-book storage in EDS

On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 18:57 +0530, Chenthill Palanisamy wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Adam Tauno Williams > wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 10:09 +0530, Chenthill Palanisamy wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > >> > Ok

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Sqlite cache for address-book storage in EDS

On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 14:15 +0100, Matthias Braun wrote: > Am Montag, den 14.03.2011, 08:40 -0400 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams: > > On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 18:57 +0530, Chenthill Palanisamy wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Adam Tauno Williams > > > wrot

Re: [Evolution-hackers] IMAP Features plugin -- still useful?

On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:39 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > The IMAP Features (imap-headers) plugin allows you to specify which > headers to download from an IMAP server when building folder summaries. > This is useful for instance when you have client-side filters that > operate on particular heade

Re: [Evolution-hackers] IMAP Features plugin -- still useful?

On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:39 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > The IMAP Features (imap-headers) plugin allows you to specify which > headers to download from an IMAP server when building folder summaries. > This is useful for instance when you have client-side filters that > operate on particular heade

[Evolution-hackers] Categories

When saving a task or event over a CalDAV collection Evolution sends a CATEGORIES attribute like: CLASS:PUBLIC CATEGORIES:Favorites\,Gifts\,Goals/Objectives PERCENT-COMPLETE:0 Looking at RFC2445 I'm pretty sure this is wrong. Shouldn't it be: CLASS:PUBLIC CATEGORIES:Favorite,Gifts,Goals/Objecti

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Categories

On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 07:14 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > When saving a task or event over a CalDAV collection Evolution sends a > CATEGORIES attribute like: > CLASS:PUBLIC > CATEGORIES:Favorites\,Gifts\,Goals/Objectives > PERCENT-COMPLETE:0 > Looking at RFC2445 I'm pr

[Evolution-hackers] Attachments?

Are attachments for tasks related to a CalDAV task list supposed to be functional? If the attachment is encoded as a link [and the site requires authentication] Evolution presents a "HTTP authentication required" error dialog and drops the attachment; it doesn't ask for authentication or attempt

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Attachments?

On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:23 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > Are attachments for tasks related to a CalDAV task list supposed to be > functional? > If the attachment is encoded as a link [and the site requires > authentication] Evolution presents a "HTTP authentication require

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Attachments?

On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:23 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > Are attachments for tasks related to a CalDAV task list supposed to be > functional? > If the attachment is encoded as a link [and the site requires > authentication] Evolution presents a "HTTP authentication require

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Attachments?

On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 22:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:23 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > Are attachments for tasks related to a CalDAV task list supposed to be > > functional? > > If the attachment is encoded as a link [

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Attachments?

On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 06:59 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 22:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:23 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > > Are attachments for tasks related to a CalDAV task list supposed to be > >

Re: [Evolution-hackers] calendar events with category list - Evolution 2.32

On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:57 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 14:25 +0100, Valluri, Amarnath wrote > > When see this event in Evolution-2.32 UI(Import Assistant), only the > > last(Business) category is shown. > > I could see the same issue reported by Patrick on Evolution-2.10 bu

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Since evolution-alarm-notify asks for passwords

On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 08:36 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: > > My question is whether there can be done any better way of coping with > > this, because having the password prompts (there are two pilled, > > actually) after each and every login is just a bad experience, from my > > point of view. > (G