We have an Exchange 2000 SP3 setup with some Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers in it.
With UsersComputers on the AD side, users with Exchange 5.5 mailboxes show the
Exchange-related tabs; we can do things like changing storage limits and have
the ADC replicate these into the Exchange 5.5 directory.
If we
Something else I have seen recently is that the presence of emails at the
top level of the mailbox. The only way I know to find these is to log into
the users mailbox asa secondary mailbox to your own. Then select his
Mailbox listing in your Folder list view (the middle column). If you see
some
Or if you don't want to add it as a second mailbox, just set off the web
page view from properties.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 November 2002 12:28
To: Exchange
You mean like the user dragged them into Outlook Today, at which point
they couldn't see them from Outlook? Right-click on Outlook today,
select Properties, click Home Page and turn off the show home page
thingy, then you can see them and move them back.
-Original Message-
From: Couch,
Thank you Craig for giving such a succint lucid description of the Exchange
store. I liked it so much I forwarded it to everyone in the department to
read.
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
Thanks Tom. I have now learned my one thing for the day. Can I go home
now?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: losts mails
You mean like the user dragged them into Outlook
Weird. User had notepad popup and display this message.
Hi, guess you have got the message. I have kept a list of files that I have
infected under this. If you are smart enough just reverse back the process.
i could have done far better damage, i could have even completely wiped your
harddisk.
I have a weird one for you. We have one user who's emails stick in his
outbox. This is just for external emails. I thought it was because he is
on a laptop and was having connection problems to the exchange server. That
was not the case; I logged in as this user on our terminal server, and set
I found it at both Trend and Symantec, actually. Take your pick.
http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.prolin.worm.html
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_PRO
LIN.A
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At:
Sybari (Antigen) has this up on their archives. It dates back to 11/00. If
you are blocking .exe files, you should be fine. If you want to take a look
at it, here is the link:
http://www.sybari.com/alerts/
Then do a search for The Penguin
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Orin
Never mind, I fixed it. Somehow the MTA service was not turned on. DUH,
just goes to show you: Check the easy stuff first.
^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^
Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd.
981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^
Doug
Doug,
Does the user have a Internet Email account setup on his Profile.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 November 2002 13:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Stuck
No filters on mailbox, no defined view, user didn't delete the message. He only
replied to a message, and both messages (from inbox and sent items) disapeared... We
are using Exchange 2000 SP2 and Outlook 2000 SP2
I know I have some bandwidth problem here (my exchange server is on a distant
Has anyone had any experiences with using PDA's for
accessing user mailboxes? Our company is starting to
research use of PDA's. So far I have done some research
on the BlackBerry site.
Any recommendations as to server software for E2K SP2.
Any hardware recommendations for the PDA's
Thanks in
That helps but I still have some questions. I'll try to be more clear.
When I look in the Exchange System Manager at an account does or does that
not give one at least a relatively true size for that persons mailstore size?
Bindview tells me they simply use the numbers provided by Exchange to
http://blackberry.net/products/software/server/index.shtml
Best way to go. Less hassle for the users.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell,
Ronald B.
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Pennell, Ronald
Microsoft has something called the 'Mobile Internet Server' or something
to that effect.
I believe it's made for access to mailboxes via Handhelds and Mobile
Phones. The site used to be loaded with marketing crap so I couldn't
find any hard facts.
We don't officially support PDAs, but I (and a
Beware of blackberry. Don't know about the situation in the states, but
in Europe the GSM provider must specifically support blackberry (ie. Not
any GSM provider with GPRS support).
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 November 2002 4:38 PM
For pure Exchange connectivity options, Blackberry is really the only player
in town, and they are wonderful as long as they work in your area.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
We only have a few PocketPC users, but we have had good success with the OWA
for PDA at http://www.leederbyshire.com. It works especially well if the
users have wireless Internet access, but our users also can access it via
dial-up on their PocketPC.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From:
Exchange doesn't currently offer mailbox replication to other servers. There
are a number of 3rd party high availability solutions which offer
replication of Exchange server data across the LAN/WAN. Some of these
products[1] are listed at www.mail-resources.com in the web links | server |
high
As part of the research (part of the very early on research IMO) I'd
recommend getting groups of likely users together for brief meetings (brown
bag lunches possibly) where they could provide a list of features they'd
like to have in using a PDA. Then work with them to prioritize the list and
use
Was it a message, or an appointment request? If he has his Outlook
configured a particular way, as soon as he replies accept/deny/tentative,
Outlook puts the appointment on his calendar and *automatically* puts the
request in the Deleted Items.
-Original Message-
From: Albert Charron
We are in a trial period with blackberry on the O2 (BT cellnet) network -
it's working very well.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 November 2002 15:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000
Jim,
Regardless of the the trend I see for all other users, I would have a
problem believing either set of numbers. Here's why:
The first set of numbers (if that is actually kilobytes and not bytes) would
indicate that there SHOULD be a total of ~336mb in the first mailbox.
Obviously, there
Got a question for you all. In the planning stages of a E2K migration from
5.5 SP4. My question is, do you need an ADC if you join your existing 5.5
ORG with your E2K server in a new site and are there any pitfalls to doing
it this way??
Josh Bennett
Exchange Admin\Systems Engineer
What is a desirable computer room temperature?
Ours is currently at:
69 Degree Fahrenheit
45 Percent Relative Humidity
Is this to hot?
Thanks,
Eric Sabo
NT Administrator
Computing Services Center
California University of Pennsylvania
Are you running E2K SP2 or SP3 (you should be). Pre-SP2 was not as good
as automatically switching over to another global catalog.
And Mike is right, both domain controllers must be global catalogs if
you want redundancy for Exchange 2000.
HTH,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Dan Aalberg
No pitfalls other than you can't actually do it that way.
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Got a question for you all. In the planning stages of a E2K
migration from
5.5 SP4.
Sounds just about perfect.
-Original Message-
From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT-Computer Room Temperature
What is a desirable computer room temperature?
Ours is currently at:
69 Degree Fahrenheit
We're in the process of locking down ports for our Exchange 5.5 deployment.
I've read the FAQ's and found ports required, but have a couple of
questions.
If you have a Exchange Server with no IMC on it just mailboxes do you need
TCP 25 SMTP enabled. I would think it should only be enabled for
We are currently configuring a select few mailboxes for POP3 delivery for
their WAP devices. This is a temporary setup until we upgrade to Exchange
2000 but I need to get it working.
Here is my setup: 1 site with 2 Exchange 5.5 SP3 servers. IMS is setup on
server 1. the DNS record for
To answer your last question: Move all of your POP users to the same server. To pick
up their mail, they have to point to the server their mailbox is hosted on.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:32 AM
To:
Exchange 5.5 doesn't do protocol proxing for POP3/IMAP. Users need to point
directly to the server their mailbox resides on to retrieve mail via these
protocols. So, as darcy suggested move all users to the same box or publish
a pop2, pop3 and pop4 PRN. E2K will support protocol porying with the
Thanks for the quick answer Darcy and Chris.
-
Matthew Bailey
LAN Engineer
CSK Auto Inc.
602-631-7486
-
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002
Why couldn't you if you are in mixed-mode?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K migration
No pitfalls other than you can't actually do it that way.
-Original
You can't join a 5.5 Org to an E2K server. You can join an E2K server to an
existing 5.5 ORG, but only if you have the ADC installed first.
Hunter
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
In order to install Exchange 2000 into an Exchange 5.5 org it needs to be
installed into an existing Exchange 5.5 site. And as you've already
determined, in order to install into an Exchange 5.5 site, an ADC needs to
be installed. Begin at any point along this circle, and in the end you'll
wind up
There is a lot (and I mean a LOT) of legacy crap (for the lack of a better
term) that we do not want to carry to E2K. We where looking to just export
mailboxes to PST and re-import. However, the more I look at it, there does
not seem to be any way to avoid using an ADC unless we just do a
I apologize if I worded things incorrectly. That is what I meant. We have a
5.5 ORG that we are going to install a E2K server in a new site in the 5.5
ORG to eventually replace the 5.5 environment with.
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Hunter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday,
That's not entirely true (that you have to cut over all at once). However,
cleaning up legacy crap before putting the migration into motion is an
extremely sound initial step. If cutover is not immediate then information
needs to be replicated between the systems and that replication should be as
Without knowing exactly how you are configured, it is difficult to provide
meaningful recommendations, but I'll give it a shot.
In Exchange 5.5 if you do not have an IMC set up on it, then you should
not need port 25. Same thing with X.400. If you are not running any X.400
connectors, then you
We're planning to bring up an Exchange 2000 server in our environment in the
next week. It will coexist with our Exchange 5.5 server for a few months.
I used the ADC from Exchange Sp3 CD. We've run /forestprep and /domainprep
and have created a two-way connection agreement, but I have not seen
Thanks this is good information as I learn little by little. Our IMC is on
it's own separate box, so that would require port 25. The systems that
house our users do not have a IMC's but pass mail to the dedicated IMC's, so
they don't need port 25.
X.400...since it's used internally by 5.5,
Joshua, you can migrate from E55 to E2K without installing the ADC.
However, the mechanics of it are very different from the Traditional
migration. What you are looking at is a Clean and Pristine migration.
The nuts and bolts of this are:
1. Install E2K server into a new Exchange organization
The blackberry 957...with the GOOD software is Sweet!!!
full OL capability (ok no GAL surfing yet, and drafts dont sync..but
everything else does) It Rocks!
If you want full OL/exchange integration then get the GOOD software.
The blackberry server software as of yet does NOT do full integration
I use my Blackberry all the time and it works great. In fact, I'm not sure
how I would live without it. We also have some people that use Palm's via
POP to gain access to messages.
In my opinion, if you want the least amount of hassles and a solution that
can scale, Blackberry is tough to beat.
Just curious, does exch 2k do protocol proxy for pop/smtp?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: POP3 on Exchange 5.5
Exchange 5.5 doesn't do protocol proxing for POP3/IMAP.
Windows 2000 SP3
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Exchange 2k SP3
Exchange Site A has 3 Exchange 5.5 Servers
Exchange Site B has 2 Exchange 5.5 Servers
Exchange Site C has 1 Exchange 5.5 Server
We have 3 AD Sites that correspond exactly to our 3 Exchange 5.5 Sites. We
have set up our ADC and all of our
Check your Site Replication Service (SRS).
-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2k/Exchange 5.5 Mixed Mode problem
Windows 2000 SP3
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Exchange 2k SP3
Is the CA to the E5.5 Site Primary for Exchange?
Jim Collins
Sr. Systems Engineer
Competitive Computing, Inc.
www.competitive.com
-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange
We have tested MS MIS and it worked pretty well.
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes
Microsoft has something called
These tabs will only appear on a machine where the Exchange management tools
are installed.
-Original Message-
From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
We're planning to bring up an Exchange 2000 server in
Well, SMTP protocol proxying either already exists in 5.5 or is a creature
like a Jackalope depending on your perspective. E2K FE servers will proxy
for POP3 and IMAP4.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:27 PM
To:
We are considering MS MIS. Is there anything you don't like about it?
Dennis Depp
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000
The computer I'm using has the Exchange Management tools installed. What I
am not seeing when creating a user, is a drop-down to select Exchange Tasks.
I see that the ADC has started but nothing else -- no errors, nothing.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I have setup an A/A Exchange cluster with SP3 in parallel with an Exchange
5.5 SP4. I can move mailboxes from Exch5.5 to any of the other servers or
vice versa. But When I create a new user with a mailbox, the mailbox is not
created on any of the cluster servers. But when one looks at the property
Maybe the Advanced Features on the View pulldown menu?
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions
The computer I'm using has the Exchange
Hi,
What is the consenus out there on using an assigned Exchange service
account vs using the Local System account for Exchange 2000? This would
be for a fairly large environment.
Thanks,
Darrin
_
List posting FAQ:
Yes it's a two-way agreement and its set to primary both ways.
This is a primary connection agreement for the connected exchange
organization.
This is a primary connection agreement for the connected windows
domain.
Both are checked.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Collins
All of the exchange services (except the ADC) should run under the
context of Local System on E2K. Why would you even want to change this?
-Original Message-
From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:26 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, at 12:26pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We also have some people that use Palm's via POP to gain access to
messages.
Anyone here using IMAP to access Exchange from a handheld? I'm seeing
increasing numbers of handheld devices and/or software for them that support
IMAP. I'm
Doable, but why? I mean, I can whack myself in the head with a 2x4. Very
doable, but why?
- Original Message -
From: Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:26 PM
Subject: Exchange System Account
Hi,
What is the
Just curious if anyone could see any reason why they would want to
this.
Just throwing it out there.
Thanks,
Darrin
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange System
For Exchange2000, in Exchange System Manager the 'mailbox' will not show
up until either the user logs into their 'mailbox' or an object is sent
to the mailbox, like a new email.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of M2web
Sent:
You'd survive just fine without it. If by 'least amount of hassles' you
mean 'if you have an additional $400 per user to throw away'.
After seeing PocketPC handle messaging with POP, IMAP and OWA to
Exchange, I really can't see the value of a Backberry anymore IF you
have other PDA's in place.
Upgrading a single NT4 Exchange 5.5 environment to a new W2K Exchange
2000 environment using a new AD Domain (1 server does it all in both
environments) .
Users are a mix of NT4, W2K and XP Pro workstations using Outlook 2000
or Outlook XP.
Using Exmerge on 5.5 to create a .PST file for
I just noticed another post SPK4 fix ...
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?ReleaseID=45312area=searcho
rdinal=4
I can't seem to find a good URL that has a list of post SPK4 fix's. I know
I've applied at least 6.
_
But do you really need to apply them if you aren't experiencing the
specific issues they address?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Finch Brett
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I just
Well no not this one, but I do recall a few of them were security related
(ASP and IMS). Which is why it would be nice to take a look at all of them
and decide. Quite frankly with the timing of this one, I'm wondering if a
beta of Outlook11 didn't spur this...
-Original Message-
From:
None that I can see.
- Original Message -
From: Darrin J. Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 6:12 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange System Account
Just curious if anyone could see any reason why they would want to
this.
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=8206source=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 17:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Event ID: 8206 MSExchangeFBPublish
Anybody else seeing this
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/product.cfm?id=312
Content Auditor
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Davinder Gupta
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 19:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Keyword search
Is there a way to do a search
As you can see, like most technologies, PDA's are surrounded by lots of
opinions. Often people like what they have used, even if it is only one
type and have no real basis for a comparison (i.e. valid opinion).
Ok, the ugly truth: None of the systems out there are very good yet.
You've heard
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=184source=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Online Defragmentation
I have just this on the Event Viewer. What
Right. Remember, none of the numbers can be valid because there is no such
thing as a physical mailbox. They are views, and as such, any size
attributed to them is a theoretical number obtained by summing a bunch of
stuff. Also, remember that notes and attachments associated with calendar
This problem seems to be caused by a server being rebuilt in the
exchange organization without it being removed first from the
organization using Exchange Administrator in RAW mode.
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=209source=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q165947
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Saul
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 19:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error in Application Log
I am running Exchange 2000 SP3, W2K
I've also seen this happen if the Public Folder Store does not have a
replica of the free/busy data for the site.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Cool enough that your equipment doesn't burn up. Not so cool that you
drive your electric bill up unnecessarily.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is no M: drive. There is no mailbox.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Thursday,
I'm waiting until there's a system that will zap the mail directly into
my brain without any stupid belt-hung device. I don't receive much of
anything but Spam anyway.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
They're in the registry.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Technical Consultant
hp Services
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:42
Indeed. The latter does become an issue, esp. in a place like Las Vegas
in July.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cool enough that your
84 matches
Mail list logo
