how is your exchange connected to internet?
r u using smtp gateway for incoming and outgoing messages?
how is ur dns configured for resolution?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Not true, the RUS will stamp the addresses as per the Recipient Policy
when the new account appears on the domain controller it looks at.
Perhaps you are thinking of mailbox rights which are only created
whenever the user first logs in or the delivery of the first piece of
mail.
-Original
I am running Exchange 5.5 on a Windows 2000 server with AD. How do I set
internal mail limit send\receive of 5 megs only. I have a 5 meg send\receive
limit set for external SMTP mail.
Thank you for any the help.
Mark...
_
List
What are some of the products that people are using as centrailized vault
storage for long time email retention?
We know about KVS, but what others are out there that people have used and
have good or bad results with?
Milt
_
You do not need a FE/BE setup.
Any decently modern hardware will barely notice 100 users. Besides, a
FE/BE setup doesn't really reduce the CPU load on the mailbox server
unless you are doing SSL.
Also, to do FE/BE you need the enterprise version of exchange (at least
for Exchange 2000 - not sure
If you have more than one Exchange server, you can set it at the MTA. But if
you only have one, you cant do anything for internal mail.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pouncey, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 5:05 AM
To: Exchange
I am looking for alternate solutions to using PST files. I have had
numerous users come to me with corrupt files. Are there any out there?
Kevin
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
I have used the Assentor product for SEC compliance but not the archiving
product. They just came out with some new stuff. Might be worth looking at,
not sure about pricing though.
From: Milt Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
EX 5.5, NT4 SP6a
Event service won't start and displays the following error message:
Could not start the Microsoft Exchange Event Service service on \\s-mail
Error 2140: An internal Windows NT error occured.
The only entry related in EV is Event ID 5 with the following description:
An
Why not just store them on the server; i.e. maiboxes and do away with .pst's?
Paul Chinnery
Network Administrator
Mem Med Ctr
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Dietz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 9:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PST Alternative?
I am
I found the resolution. The Exchange Event Service needs to run as the
Exchange service account that was used to install exchange...not
localsystem. Thanks for everyone's help.
_
List posting FAQ:
Increase the disk space and thus the limits on the Exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Dietz
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PST Alternative?
I am looking for alternate
I've seen various articles on this. One states to re-install the event
service portion on 5.5 by using the add/remove. The issue I had was on
Exch2000 and was that the service needed to run as the exchange service
account.
_
List
Assentor did not provide a seamless integration with Outlook for the
end-users. It allowed reviewers to use a web interface to look at
archived messages. I don't know about the new stuff though.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
Q270677
Jon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 7:32 AM
Posted To: exchange
Conversation: Event Service won't start
Subject: Event Service won't start
EX 5.5, NT4 SP6a
Event service won't start and displays the
Just to add to this thread. If you do implement SSL on the back-end, it
can cause a bit of a config headache in the future if you want to add
OMA and ActiveSync. Basically, with SSL present, you cannot simply use
the default configuration for ActiveSync and OMA - new virtual
directories must be
This brings up the old philosophical question about how much disk space
do you allow any one user. 100mb, 1gb, 10gb, 100gb??
I work at a place where folks work 20, 30, 40 years. Some of these folks
would keep every shred of email forever if there was not some upper
limit on their space. We try to
I've inherited a network running Samba 3.0 as a PDC and would like to
migrate to either NT 4.0 or windows server 2003 and was wondering if anyone
could offer any suggestions on how to move the SAM over to a Windows PDC.
Any tools out ther that will help acomplish this task. I've already tried
The account associated with Event Service is the same as the one used to
install Exchange,
however Event service won't still start.
-Original Message-
From: M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Event service
Since this most likely means stopping EX, running Optimizer and re-applying
the SP,
it'll have to wait for an off-peak time.
In the mean time, can you point me to those articles?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:59 AM
To:
Hi there
I have an urgent question.
I came in this morning and found the AD completely blocked because
surveyor.exe was taking up all memory resources on the DC. After
rebooting the memory use went back to normal and users could log to the
network.
Unfortunately when our director booted his PC
Hi,
I think I am probably the poster you are refering to. We haven't posted the
fix because we still haven't resolved it.
Since my last posting on this thread, we have tried running without the
Sophos MailMonitor anti-virus and also without the GFI MailEssentials. The
problems continued while
Good morning,
I have a client that is moving from 5.5 to 2003. Their 5.5 box had been
set for LDAP to run on port 390, all was well.
However when I load 2003 on a new member server and run everything
through, the new 2003 box can't connect and move mailboxes from the 5.5
box. ADC says that
All,
We extensively use MS Electronic Forms/Forms Designer here, I would be
grateful if someone could point me in the right direction on how the
forms could be used to populate a database as well as being delivered to
the relevant public folder for action. Does anyone know of a good
resource
Not sure what happened to answer your first question. But you can not
restore a single mailbox from backup unless you use bricklevel backup
method. Restore DB to a recovery box then run exmerge is the one way.
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
I had a customer run into the same issue. Althoug still not resolved the
last time I spoke with them they tried all of the things you mentioned. They
where running TrendMicro. Please post if you finally resolve it.
From: Mark Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Might want to look at www.slipstick.com
From: Mark Condron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Electronic Forms
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:20:39 -
All,
We extensively use MS Electronic Forms/Forms Designer
Hi, folks:
Our environment: native AD and E2k SP3, WinXP on the desktops, Outlook
2000/2002 clients.
Would anyone have tips on how to access OSTs when the primary mailbox
owner/account has already been deleted from AD? We recently had some
downsizing and are trying to get to emails on laptops
I can't restore the backup to the store. (it is indeed brick-level)
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 January 2004 15:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lost mailbox
Not sure what happened to answer your first question. But you can not
There is a tool called OST2PST. It is supposed to convert the ost file
to a pst file, which you can then work with. Google found this link.
http://salvatore.f2o.org/media/apps/ost2pst.zip
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From:
Can anyone point me to resources covering this topic? Specifically, I'd
like to include information like:
Your current mailbox size is X
The size of your Y folder is Z
etc.
-Yanek.
This electronic message
Here is a good link
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF012.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Exchange
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Manager Report Customization
Can anyone
There is in fact an OST2PST converter. I used it several years ago to
convert the ost of a user that had left on his computer. It worked like
a champ and I think it cost less then $100. I don't remember the
website but you should be able to google for it.
-Doug Jones
-Original
One other option is to start the machine up, log in as the user (using
cached credentials) and then open Outlook offline, and copy it to a PST.
That's assuming, of course, you can reasonably hack their password.
--
Roger D. Seielstad -
With a Win2K machine running post SP3, Syskey is enabled by default and
makes most attempts at breaking the users password useless unless you are
launching a brute force login attack. I have had some limited success with
logging into the machine as a another privilaged user account, rolling the
Shoot, just log in as the local admin. You will have access to all the
user profiles, hence access to the .ost file.
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004
Was his AD account deleted or was his mailbox deleted?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 4:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Lost mailbox
Hi there
I have an urgent question.
I came in this morning and found the AD
Could be a DNS problem. Is your AD DNS server using root hints or
forwarders? I had an issue a while ago where my SMTP servers stopped
sending mail. It started happening soon after we changed our AD DNS
servers from using forwarders to using root hints. It turned out that MS
AD DNS was not fully
When you look at the list of mailboxes in the information store, do you
see the orphaned mailbox marked with red?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lost mailbox
Only the
No, he's gone completely, but I have brick level backups
Kind regards,
Kim
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 January 2004 17:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Lost mailbox
When you look at the list of mailboxes in the information
I have not used brick level that much... maybe you need to manually
create a new mailbox for him and then restore it from a brick level
backup?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Yesterday morning the Unix box our Exchange system hands off
Internet-bound email to was having a problem, as initially evidenced on
the Exchange side by the filling up of remote SMTP queues. As part of
the troubleshooting process I restarted the SMTP virtual server. When I
did this it flushed all
Perhaps, but unless I'm totally missing something, it doesn't answer my
question. :)
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:28
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Mailbox Manager Report Customization
Subject: RE:
Thank you all for your replies.
Regards,
-Juancho
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english
To
Good afternoon,
I have a client that is moving from 5.5 to 2003. Their 5.5 box had been
set for LDAP to run on port 390, all was well.
However when I load 2003 on a new member server and run everything
through, the new 2003 box can't connect and move mailboxes from the 5.5
box. ADC says that
E2K SP3
W2K SP3
Any idea why I can't add an smtp address to every mailbox in the org?
I am trying to add it to the default policy then apply the ppolicy, and
it isn't working..
_
List posting FAQ:
Is the Exchange 5.5 server also a Windows 2000 DC?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:58
Does anyone have a utility to test relaying through a isolated relay?
I have built an IMSS server, to take over the task of relaying from Exchange
for internal use. The server points internal mail to Exchange and external
to another IMSS server on the DMZ.
Normally I would telnet in and send
Ok...slight problem here.
O/S - Win2k, SP2
Exch - 5.5, SP4+
Situation: MTS-Out is so clogged with outbound NDR's to spammers, that
when I open the 5.5 Exchange Admin Console and attempt to look at the
Outbound awaiting conversion queue of the IMS connector, the console
just freezes. Had this
Just pretty sure? Have you checked?
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Joyce
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 11:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Have you run all the prerequisite steps such as ForestPrep and DomainPrep?
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 7:19 AM
To:
Anything in the event log?
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recipient
If it were an open relay, it would let you send mail from any From
address regardless of whether or not you have a valid account.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL
Nothing at all..
I am on the phone with PSS as we speak, he seems a tad confused..
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient Policies
Anything in the event log?
Ed
Restarting the System Attendant Service might help.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recipient Policies
E2K SP3
W2K SP3
Any idea why I can't add an smtp address to every mailbox
The first may be true, don't believe the second is. But it's Monday and
I was up late helping my son with his science project so...
-Original Message-
From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Sunday, January 11, 2004 10:17 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Exchange 2003
When you create a new mailbox the smtp address doesn't get show until the
user logs in although the address is valid. Not sure if this applies to new
addresses set by new recipient policies. Did you try sending to a user to
see if it goes through?
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.slipstick.com
www.outlookcode.com
www.cdolive.com
-Original Message-
From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004 6:21 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Electronic Forms
Subject: Electronic Forms
All,
We extensively use MS Electronic Forms/Forms
Exchange not configured to not permanently delete mailboxes when the
associated AD account is deleted. Wow, that kinda sucks. Someone might
want to change that setting back to the way it was out of the box.
-Original Message-
From: Juancho Ciocon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At:
It's not simply a question of access to the file if one wants to open it
offline using Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004 9:53 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Converting OST to PST
Subject: RE: Converting OST to
It is restricted to certain hosts; I can add any host in there for testing.
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Internal relay test
If it were an open relay, it would
I am trying to move PFs to from and exchange 2000 server (SP3) to a
exchange 2003 server. I added the new server as a replica to all pfs.
Here is what is weird. Before I replicated the folders over, I could
see the contents fine(my mailbox is on the new server). When the new
server was added as
Oh, and it's only Outlook 2003 that can use large PST files. The
Exchange MAPI drivers (exmerge, etc) are still limited to small PST
files.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 10:17 PM
To: Exchange
Ok, now he says we need to restart the SA for it take effect...
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient Policies
Nothing at all..
I am on the phone with PSS as we speak, he seems a tad confused..
This happened me too. When I finally got rid of my Exchange 5.5 box and
went to native mode, it worked. You don't have a 5.5 box in your org,
do you?
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:30
Posted To:
Nah, it stamps all the attr's. It just wont stamp existing ones. MS PSS
says I have to restart all the SA's on E2K servers running a RUS. In our
case, 7.
Argh...
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:14 PM
To: Exchange
Sounds like folder replication was not yet complete for the folder(s) in
question. PF replication is a lazy operation IIRC.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004 1:33 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Public Folder
Yeah that's what I was beginning to think. I just checked the actual
pub.edb and the modified date goes back to Nov of 2003, but the pub.stm
has a modified date of today. If I go to a PF and post content on it
from Outlook, should it not modify the modified date on the pub.edb?
-Original
Guess I should have mentioned that this is an Exchange 2000 sp3 system.
Jon
-Original Message-
From: Martin, Jon
Posted At: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:35 AM
Posted To: exchange
Conversation: Incorrect NDRs Miss-Addressed Email Queues
Subject: Incorrect NDRs Miss-Addressed Email Queues
Nope E2K native mode..
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recipient Policies
This happened me too. When I finally got rid of my Exchange 5.5 box and
went to native mode, it
If there are problems with the RUS, generally you will see the errors
while the System Attendant starts (because this is the process that
manages the RUS). When troubleshooting RUS problems I generally only need
to work with one RUS from the domain that is having the problems to see
where the
You can try to move RUS to another server and see what happens. In the
RUS config, you have two knobs to twist - the RUS home server and domain
controller. Try different combos and see what happens. This is a part of
my scientific jiggle method.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems
In the really early releases of Exchange 2000, there were some issues
with RUS. If there was an address conflict, RUS would stop stamping
addresses. But those issues were taken care of by the service packs.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Dear All,
I am getting ready to upgrade an Exch 5.5 system running on NT4 to Exch 2003 on Win
2003 and am trying to decide whther or not to use a front end server. I will have
approx. 100 users accessing this server via POP3/IMAP and another 30 or so via OWA.
Additionally I will have another
There used to be a FE/BE document on http://www.microsoft.com/ISN
I don't know if it is still there.
Based on my own experience at the previous place, we ran two OWA/SMTP
FEs configured with MS Windows Load Balancing. Each machine had 512MB
RAM, dual 800MHz CPUs, and one 18GB RAID1 volume (I
Actually, in a pinch, if one of those FEs was down, the other one was
able to handle things by itself fine. More RAM would have helped.
Sincerely,
Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP
Systems Engineer
Messaging and Collaboration
Spherion
-Original Message-
From: Fyodorov, Andrey
Sent:
I can't get too scientific here, but I currently have 100 in-house users
running outlook, plus another 50 at any given time accessing their mail over
OWA. All of this is being done on the following very modest hardware:
Intel P3-1000 Mhz, 512 MB Ram and 10k rpm SCSI disks. I log all of the
Ok...slight problem here.
O/S - Win2k, SP2
Exch - 5.5, SP4+
Situation: MTS-Out is so clogged with outbound NDR's to spammers, that when
I open the 5.5 Exchange Admin Console and attempt to look at the Outbound
awaiting conversion queue of the IMS connector, the console just freezes.
Had this
I think I may have fixed my occurrences of a similar issue.
I had an Dell RAC3 which didn't have drivers so was disabled.
When the drivers were loaded it defaulted to a 192.162.x.x address.
SMTP vs was set to use 'all assigned'.
I have explicitly set it to one ip address.
I'm not sure if this was
Is it possible to find out which folder is contained in the data section
of the event ?
one such data section is:
: 004d005b 00580042 0043003a 00720068
0010: 00730069 00690074 0065006e 00530020
0020: 00680063 006c0075 0065006c 005d0072
0030: 0049002f 0062006e 0078006f
is there a way to
Exchange 5.5,sp4
Outlook xp with sp2
when my users are away, they set ooo for their
emailers, however, these ooo messages are only
delivered to the local network only.
I have tested this by sending an email from my
network-outlook account to my yahoo account and no ooo
message is delivered.
Did
James,
mr.bhi-erc.com internet address = 206.61.211.99 --- this box is not running Exchange.
Rgds.
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jan 12, 2004 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Clogged IMS...
Ok...slight problem here.
It's happened again, Monday moning and the queue is filling up and not
moving out of 'waiting for submission'.
I went throught proceadure again but ten minutes later and the messages
are building up again.
I'm temped to uninstall the AV software and to see what happens. Every
one has av on
The default is 20GB if I remember correctly. But can be changed via
registry key if I also remember correctly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm [NY]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Event id 1147
Error 0x80040301 while disabling rule on public folder with rule ID
1-1AC16. The folder ID of the public folder is in the data section of
this event.
from MS
snip
Product: Exchange
ID: 1147
Source: MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store
Version: 6.0
Component: Information Store
32TB theoretically.
No .. I haven't hit that limit yet at home.
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL
That surprises me because it's a new server and the public folder store is
on this new server and I haven't changed any permissions. I will
definitely check though. The question I guess would be, what account
would need permission to what? Exchsvc? Servername$? Exch Admins?
Didn't we set a limit at 16 gigs in stead of going for the big limit???
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Tuip
[MVP]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 1:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 2003 backups
32TB
There's also a registry setting that you can pump up for event service debugging which
I used when I had similar problems in 55. I don't recall exactly what it but technet
will tell you.
leeann
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of M
Sent:
There are unsubscribe instructions at the bottom of the list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Reasoner, Bob (PHES)
Sent: 08 January 2004 22:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake
While I don't want to sound like a
He's still suffering from culture shock.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004
Kinda like his dad, eh?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:05 PM
To:
That's probably the best way to do it.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:59 PM
Yes, and all their names as well!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: doubletake
Do you want to see pictures of my 257 cats?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail
Route it to an iMail server that has a Nobody alias (catch-all alias)
Well, you would have to buy iMail for that. But there are some similar
e-mail server programs out there that are free that allow Nobody
aliases. For example MailEnable (although it is a POS).
Oh, Mercury Pegasus Mail comes to
We are in the process of replacing one of our Exchange servers and the new
server's Exchange Event service will not start. The following appears in
the application log whenever an attempt is made to start the service:
Event Type: Information
Event Source: MSExchangeES
Event Category:
Matthew, you will find that the PST=BAD has become religious dogma on
this list. In reality, PST files are just another tool, and much like
any other tool (inclined plane, fire, chainsaw, etc) they are neither
inherently good nor evil.
On the other hand, while PST files can serve a useful
That's one of the reasons the FAQ recommends subscribing a public
folder...
PIMPCBO
-Original Message-
From: Reasoner, Bob (PHES) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:54 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: doubletake
Subject: RE: doubletake
While I don't want
I have a PST larger than 2GB FWIW. Seems to work fine.
Yes, I'm mostly just being difficult.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:47 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Exchange 2003 backups
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003
Look on Sue Mosher's Slipstick site for Ffolder Utility:
Ffolder Utility: Utility to rename or delete special
Outlook folders such as the Calendar, Tasks, Inbox, and Contacts. VB
source code included.
http://www.slipstick.com/addins/gallery/index.htm#ffolder
You could perhaps copy all data from
1 - 100 of 55897 matches
Mail list logo
