-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler;boeing.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail blasts
You like to pay more for it?
The external source is owned by your CEO (ala Enron)?
You don't want to deal with reply traffic?
Your link
You like to pay more for it?
The external source is owned by your CEO (ala Enron)?
You don't want to deal with reply traffic?
Your link to your ISP is via a 300 baud acoustic modem?
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA;AIIM.ORG]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:08 PM
To:
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail blasts
You like to pay more for it?
The external source is owned by your CEO (ala Enron)?
You don't want to deal with reply traffic?
Your link to your ISP is via a 300 baud acoustic modem?
-Original Message-
From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA
You have a smart user.
http://www.grinningshark.com
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
That reminds me, I need to reinstall my copy of that here at work.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu 10/10/2002 13:26
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Mail loop
Are either one of you being blacklisted?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vincent
Avallone
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 09:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail being delayed
I am running an Exchange 2000 server with SP2.
We have ONE
A search of google or the FAQ should provide sufficient data that further
elaboration on my part is not required.
-Original Message-
From: dvij query
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 7/23/2002 11:16 PM
Subject: RE: mail trap for outgoing message.
what's that??Pls. elaborate
--- Chris
Imsext.dll
-Original Message-
From: dvij query [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mail trap for outgoing message.
Hi All, In exchange 5.5 ( frontend outlook2k) how can
we trap outbound SMTP mails without knowing
Set up a different SMTP server, enter that in his account data (by IP
address) and log it from that server. Most users don't know what an IP
address IS. Other than that, IIRC, you'll need to log all SMTP traffic
and extract that one user's data from there.
-Original Message-
From:
what's that??Pls. elaborate
--- Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Imsext.dll
-Original Message-
From: dvij query [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mail trap for outgoing message.
Hi All, In exchange 5.5
The only way I can think of is to disconnect your server from the
Internet.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon
Sent:
One could install an SMTP gateway application which refused inbound SMTP
mail FROM your domain.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAIL SPOOFING;NOT MAN SPOOFING
The only way I
Subject: RE: MAIL SPOOFING;NOT MAN SPOOFING
One could install an SMTP gateway application which refused inbound SMTP
mail FROM your domain.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MAIL
Post the entire NDR. If you dont have limits, the recipient does.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Limits
All
As far as I am aware I do not have any limits set ... but
them i'd wager
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Limits
All
As far as I am aware I do not have any limits set ... but I have just
received an NDR in the postmaster
The maibox you are sending to has the limit
Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
-Original Message-
From: Darren Ash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 13:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Limits
All
As far as I am aware I do not have any limits
Turned off OOO and reply to internet. Contacted admin at remote site.
Between the two the loop went away. Thanks for the help.
Kelly
-Original Message-
From: Saunders, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail
I get that from time to time too and my ISP is the phone company! Just
log into the web page and it'll be reset. I think it's internet.com's
problem. Really, we ought to move this forum somewhere else.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from
You can also send a message with the word unhold to reactivate. Happens to
me about once or twice a week
- Original Message -
From: Bashir Malekzada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:02 PM
Subject: Mail server rejecting email
OOO was disabled when I disabled forward to internet. Any more ideas? I
think the problem in on the receiving end.
Thanks,
Kelly
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail loop
: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail loop
OOO was disabled when I disabled forward to internet. Any more ideas? I
think the problem in on the receiving end.
Thanks,
Kelly
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
You can set the Prohibit Send and Receive Limit on the mailbox to a very
low number until the loop is quashed.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Or use turfing to kill the looping message as it comes in. Q245465
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail loop
You can set the Prohibit Send and Receive Limit on the mailbox
UDP notifications. See Q270065.
M
- Original Message -
From: Gagrani, Kishore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:41 PM
Subject: Mail won't leave Outbox unless till something is clicked on
mailbox
Hi,
After upgrading to
Q311506
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail won't leave Outbox unless till something is clicked on mailbox
Hi,
After upgrading to Exchange 2000 Server we are having a
I'm think GC or DNS issues.
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:42 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: lesser of the evils - ssl or smtp
Subject: Mail won't leave Outbox unless till something is
, June 06, 2002 3:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail won't leave Outbox unless till something is clicked on m ailbox
Q311506
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail won't
-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
I just installed it and it looks great. They say on a decent machine it can
push 8,000 messages per hour. Has anyone tested
-Original Message-
From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail stuck in Categorizer
I've had this problem and it was because the mail couldn't go to the
next
server inline, in my case it was through our outbound
Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail stuck in Categorizer
Thanks everyone for the input, so it could have been the next server
inline and now that server is up and running fine and the message is
still not going anywhere.
Any ideas on how to kick start it, I have re-started services and the
server itself
Basically it means you're waiting on AD to give Exchange the location of the
mail server the mailbox resides on or what action to do with the mail. It's
waiting on a response from AD.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:25
Hello,
We had this problem with E2K and SP1, after an inplace upgrade from 5.5 .
It only occurred to Email sent to Distribution Groups that had restrictions on who
could send to the DGs. Once the restrictions were removed from the effected lists the
stuck Email would flow out of the
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: Richard Serafin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Mail stuck in Categorizer
Hello,
We had this problem with E2K and SP1, after an inplace upgrade from 5.5
.
It only occurred to Email sent to Distribution Groups
Merak looks good. Similar to Imail but with more features.
Do you know if it is a good performer?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
I
Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
Merak looks good. Similar to Imail but with more features.
Do you know if it is a good performer?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Of Andrey Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
Speaking of Imail, I have seen some Imail servers running on crappy
hardware, on Win2KPro, hosting more than 10,000 mailboxes and still
delivering decent performance
Our Imail servers do POP3, IMAP, HTTP, and SMTP.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 4:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
SMTP and POP only makes a HUGE different on what performance
Is there a way to disable maling list feature in Merak?
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 6:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
I really like Merak mail.
http
Jim,
Remember categorizer = AD lookup :)
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 12:53 PM
Subject: RE: Mail stuck in Categorizer
Basically it means you're waiting on AD to give Exchange
Very good in small deployments (250 or so users.). I can't speak of its
scalability.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MS Exchange
List
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Mail stuck in Categorizer
Hello,
We had this problem with E2K and SP1, after an inplace upgrade from
]] On Behalf Of Randal, Phil
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
Don't forget David Harris's Mercury/32 from http://www.pmail.gen.nz
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
stalker cgate pro
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
Rockliffe MailSite (http://www.rockliffe.com)
IPSwitch Imail (http://www.ipswitch.com)
Gordano NTMail (http://www.gordano.com)
Out of these 3, my choice would be Rockliffe Mailsite. It
allows to create
custom
Did I read this right? FREE?
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
Don't forget David Harris's Mercury/32 from http://www.pmail.gen.nz
Phil
Yes, you did!
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2002 15:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT
Conversation: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
Subject: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
Did I read this right? FREE?
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 10:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail
: RE: Mail Exchangers for NT based systems
Yup. Free. And it's soon going to be saving the taxpayers of Texas the
money they were spending on my annual Listserv maintenance fee.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Friday, May 10, 2002 09:41
If the user did not completely close out of ALL outlook windows, the server
doesn't know he deleted a thing. I usually tell them reboot just to get
them off of my back for 5 ...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:03 AM
check the top of the information store folder...aka Outlook Today...
dave
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Question
If the user did not completely close out of ALL outlook
, 2002 12:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail question
Have you checked the Folder size via the Outlook client to see what folder
has the email
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 6:46 AM
I'm not sure that it will drive the message, since it is coming out of the
server's store automatically, but it may be wise to make sure that to OST is
not synched to a previously excessive size.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April
Those items arent counted against you.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Devine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail question
What is the Deleted Items Retention policy? If it's not Zero Days
In Outlook, right click the mailbox folder (not inbox), click properties,
click Folder Size and you'll see how much mail (in K) is in each folder.
-Original Message-
From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange
This is not a good answer, but you really should consider Outlook2000.
William
-Original Message-
From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mail stuck in a strange way
Brothers and sisters,
2 notebook
willam,
i cant begin with outlook 2000. They wouldnt like it.
gr
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:32 AM
Aan: Exchange Discussions
Onderwerp: RE: mail stuck in a strange way
This is not a good answer
No reaction?
Brothers and sisters,
2 notebook users (VIP) have the next problem:
When they work offline and send a message, the message goes to outbox.When
they are online and sychronised it,the message wordt delivered but still
exist in outbox.( Not italic letter type)There is also a
DO they have multiple Information Services set up?
Have you tried recreating their Outlook profiles then re-creating their
*.ost?
-Original Message-
From: Kiran, Murat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 5:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail stuck
They dont have multiple IS set up.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:50 PM
Aan: Exchange Discussions
Onderwerp: RE: mail stuck in a strange way
DO they have multiple Information Services set up?
Have you tried
I ran it quite some time ago, and I found it to be ok. No rulset, though :(
Mihnea Mironescu
IT Manager
Papastratos Romania SRL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel.: +40-1-221-9175
Fax: +40-1-430-4091
, March 11, 2002 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Mail Loop at MS?
I just retired from MS after eight years in support. I know what I'm talking
about.
You called in with a specific issue. As long as you're not presenting a
laundry list of issues that case is not closed until that specific
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but...
..since many of us call pss from time to time - there was this time when
i was attempting to add another DC to my network, and while working
: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:18 AM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS?
Actually, I will say that if you call in with a difficult issue, there are
times when they get pissy with you because the ticket is open too long
Since PSS has absolutely no input or administrative control over the
microsoft.com domain, including the Exchange servers, your lack of warm
fuzzies is ill-placed.
- Original Message -
From: Michel, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March
, 2002 3:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Mail Loop at MS?
Since PSS has absolutely no input or administrative control over the
microsoft.com domain, including the Exchange servers, your lack of warm
fuzzies is ill-placed.
- Original Message -
From: Michel, David [EMAIL
0x8009030c (
N:\transmt\src\smtpsink\exps\expslib\context.cpp@1414 ).
Data:
: 0c 03 09 80 ...?
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS
Unfortunately sarcasm doesn't translate well in this medium.
- Original Message -
From: Michel, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:34 PM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS?
You've misinterpreted a sarcastic jab at a company
Why another 245 quatloos? The case is open until _you_ say it's fixed.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Pinquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:39 PM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS?
I had the same thing during a support call
Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Mail Loop at MS?
Why another 245 quatloos? The case is open until _you_ say it's fixed.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Pinquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions
been asked for more than $245. In fact, I've been refunded my $245 quite a
few times.
-ryan-
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Pinquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS?
nope, i've tried to finagle
.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Pinquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:58 PM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS?
nope, i've tried to finagle them before - they're pretty specific about
what they'll fix on an issue. Generally
situations.
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Mail Loop at MS?
I just retired from MS after eight years in support. I know what I'm
talking
about.
You called in with a specific
Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but...
..since many of us call pss from time to time - there was this time when
i was attempting to add another DC to my network, and while working on
the ADS-related issue, the Server blue screened on a boot. I was
transferred
you and Dean left Daniel?
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic
oriented..
They better not Change PSS. Is this why you and Dean left Daniel?
Milton R Dogg
Of The Dogg Foundation..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail
At: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:38 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but...
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but...
I can't agree on their excellence. They do have their days. I had
PSS working on an exchange/Ad issue
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but...
You were expecting them to perform months worth of work for a few
hundred dollars?
As to the problem, since very few if any others have it, maybe the fault
should be looked at as something that you've done
before
leaving.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Pinquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but...
..since many of us call pss from time to time - there was this time
Seven months on an open case? And you never demanded escalation? Or to talk
to a manager?
- Original Message -
From: David J. Culliton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:37 PM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic
Nope. Installing Windows2000 is one issue, installing Activie Directory is
another issue. Handled by two different groups.
- Original Message -
From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:13 PM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop
No comment.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:22 PM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but...
They better not.. Or I will drive up there and Burn their campus down
to be done.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 03/11/2002 6:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 8:20 PM
Subject: RE: Mail Loop at MS? - getting a bit off topic, but...
After the 3rd or 4th tech there was a manager involved (at least he
represented himself as such). There were a total of 9 people involved over
the period in question. I
http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=article;
sid=156
(ugly link may wrap)
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Try Windows 2000 Magazine Network, Exchange and Outlook Administrator. The
article is titled Is your Exchange Server Relay-Secure? It splanes
everytang.
Art
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
You've been subscribed to the list for a long time. How about reading
the FAQ?
FAQ 3.73.
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 01:43 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Mail relay
Subject: Mail relay
Is there a way to confirm that I am stopping the relays?
Davinder
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Mail relay
You've been subscribed to the list for a long time
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q153119
try sending as Tom Meunier... ;)
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail relay
Is there a way to confirm that I
dude.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Davinder Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail relay
Is there a way to confirm that I am stopping the relays?
Davinder
-Original Message-
From: Tom
Can you record and then send me RFC2821 as a .wav file, please?
Thanks, Serdar.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail relay
It's in the article that is in the FAQ! Why don't
More detailed information is needed. i.e. Given the fact that you
stated that you use Mdaemon relay server, I assume when you say a few
site, you don't mean Exchange server sites, do you? Were these sites
able to send you email before? Did you have any DNS or network changes
at your site?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 4:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail problem
More detailed information is needed. i.e. Given the fact that you
stated that you use Mdaemon relay server, I assume when you say a few
site
The MTA on ServerA should reroute on it's own as long as the MTA on ServerB
is down.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:28 AM
Subject: Mail Queued at MTA
All Nt4 SP6a Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Ive got a
to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Levis
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mail relay
Is he on broadband or a dialup? If he's on broadband, then it wouldn't be
TOO
I recommend you post the entire NDR.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 08:25 AM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: mail
Subject: mail
Hello,
I received this message from a client
that was all they sent me as a ndr.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
I recommend you post the entire NDR.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto
sorry it is
dealers
prices
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
I recommend you post the entire NDR.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL
-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
that was all they sent me as a ndr.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange
No laughing list persons, to much multi-tasking.
Sorry for the interruption return to your Exchange discussion.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
sorry it is
dealers
prices
-Original Message
yup i recieved the message
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: mail
Works here:
test Your message
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: test
Sent:Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:44
101 - 200 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
