RE: Backing up with Windows 2000

2002-02-06 Thread Elmer Stöwer
Depending on the storage device you are using you should realy have a look at the mediapools in computer admininstration of w2k. It took me some time to find out, how and that tapes are controlled in a library in win2k. regards Elmer -- Elmer Stöwer CyberConsult - Beratungsgesellschaft für N

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread QUINN, Chris
I never went to MEC01 and I got it -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2002 22:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? I did; I just assumed it was marketing drivel from MEC01. > -Orig

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Joyce, Louis
Neither did I and I got it. What's Exchange? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2002 10:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else ge

RE: Exchange Databases in an inconsistent state

2002-02-06 Thread Mike Lagase
If you cannot get the Information Store consistent by any other means and you have no backup, then your only option is to run a eseutil /p which will force the database consistent. Be prepared to lose some mail. You may also need to run isinteg to fix the pointers in the store as well. If you go t

RE: Faxination

2002-02-06 Thread Irfan Malik
Also, When I send mail it returns back with 605 error. Any idea -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Faxination Ummm. I looked at the FAQ on their site found s

Experience poll 20,000 users

2002-02-06 Thread Tony Hlabse
I recently applied for a job which requires experience with at least 20,000 users. The job would be as a Exchange Admin. , part of a team. They said I have all the qualifications except no 20,000 environment experience. Even though over the past 5 years I have had experience at sites ranging from

RE: Experience poll 20,000 users

2002-02-06 Thread Myles, Damian
I was involved in a 25,000+ user rollout on 5.5 ... typically, the difference lay in the use and function of servers (e.g. dedicated bridgeheads for X400 and SMTP traffic) other elements to consider were working within the constraints of the NT4.0 domain model and how this might impact ove

RE: Exchange Databases in an inconsistent state

2002-02-06 Thread Andy David
Or it will blow up. Listen to what the man said. Call PSS. -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Databases in an inconsistent state If you cannot get the Information Stor

PST files

2002-02-06 Thread McCready, Robert
Exchange 5.5 SP4, Outlook 98, NT 4.0 SP6. We have a user who recently left the company. He has a PST file on his home drive. A user who has taken over his responsibilities wants to add the PST folder to their Outlook box. If you right click on the PST file and check properties, it says that t

RE: Experience poll 20,000 users

2002-02-06 Thread LSandoval
I have worked in an environment with 30,000 users and 30 servers. The big difference I have seen between large and small environments, is the large environment had no exceptions, had their processes and procedures streamlined, had a team of 12, had change control, and new their stuff really well.

RE: Ed Server Move Method - Corrupt Priv edb

2002-02-06 Thread Ramsay, Steve
Ed, In this particular case, would you recommend a Brick-level Backup as an additional precaution ;-) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2002 02:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ed Server Move Method - Corrupt Priv edb You might as

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Ray Zorz
Exchange is where you go to change euros into dollars. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? Neither d

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread DOT
Same here. Dot Harris Exchange Administrator William Blair & Company, L.L.C. > -Original Message- > From: Joyce, Louis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:15 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? >

RE: Scheduled Exchange backups using NT backup

2002-02-06 Thread Michel, David
Besides the usual "read the Disaster Recovery White Papers", check out Q300439 for command line switches to use w/ NTBackup. Just use the wizard to setup an Exchange backup and change the command line it creates to suit your needs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMA

RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts!

2002-02-06 Thread King, John
SlipStick is da bomb..! -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts! GOT IT - Thanks The SlipStick sit

RE: Experience poll 20,000 users

2002-02-06 Thread Hurst, Paul
Use to work at 110,000 user exchange site, had Email Admins all around the world. We could never run it from one Email admin group (KM security, rebuilds, servers doing one function etc), maybe they are referring to working with multiply Email Admins groups on the same system but time zoned diffe

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Joyce, Louis
Not yet. Still soldiering on with the pound. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2002 13:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spa

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Hurst, Paul
The PST has been cleared down, this is the white space/marked deleted items taking up the space. Now if you had a util to undelete deleted PST email Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message-

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread McCready, Robert
So PST files never reduce in size, regardless if everything is deleted? -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files The PST has been cleared down, this is the white space/marke

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread LSandoval
My experience has been that if you delete data from a .pst file, you must compress the .pst file to regain the space. LaCretia -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Martin Blackstone
Mine too. I have heard rumor that in Outlook2K and higher, it automatically compresses the PST, but I can neither comfirm nor deny that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Martin Blackstone
The original user may have deleted everything out of it before leaving (common move). -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PST files Exchange 5.5 SP4, Outlook 98, NT 4.0 SP6. W

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread LSandoval
No, we have Outlook2K and I still have to compress the file to get the space back. LaCretia -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PST files Mine too. I have

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Martin Blackstone
Well, there you go. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files No, we have Outlook2K and I still have to compress the file to get the space back. LaCretia -

Problem with dir-rep move

2002-02-06 Thread LSandoval
Let's see if I can explain this. We moved a dir rep connector over the weekend and during such a move all users on that dir rep should lose their membership to any distribution lists. This occurred on the bridgehead server and therefore the admin felt the dir rep move was successful. On Monday,

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Andy David
Actually I think you are right Martin, automatic background compression has been around since Outlook 98. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files Well, there you go.

Need to diagram my servers/exchange other and network devices

2002-02-06 Thread Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC
I have all the servers stuff but I need CISCO images, does anyone have a stash of routers and switches .jpg's I can use. thanks in advance /s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC, LINCS Support, List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www

RE: Need to diagram my servers/exchange other and networkdevices

2002-02-06 Thread Andy David
http://www.microsoft.com/office/visio/ -Original Message- From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need to diagram my servers/exchange other and network devices I have all the servers stuff b

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Martin Blackstone
It is hard for me to confirm. I try to avoid PSTs, and the ones I have are huge anyhow (listserv archives). -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files Actually I think you are

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Alverson, Thomas M.
Yes we have several users who freaked out when their hard drives were constantly active for "no reason". After forcing a foreground compression the activity stopped. This was a long time ago - I don't remember the version of outlook. Tom -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMA

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Cebuly, John
I got one, addressed to the smtp address I use for this list - NOT the address I gave to vendors at MEC... -Original Message- From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Bowles, John L.
Yea I got something 2 days ago from that person. What is up with that? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Cebuly, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Experience poll 20,000 users

2002-02-06 Thread Myles, Damian
That's true... also if its a greenfields project and involves workstations as well as servers then you're likely to find a separate project team with its own project life cycle for deployment, design and testing teams and separate rollout teams. They may just have decided to 'scope' anyone with

Names not resoling correctly

2002-02-06 Thread Mitchell Mike
Good morning, Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Sp4 I have an instance where a user keys in a name in the to: box and the name resolves. But once the message goes out it is returned because of a bad address. The person swears they are using the global address list. I have no problems with the list. T

RE: Problem with dir-rep move

2002-02-06 Thread Ramsay, Steve
Try running the Knowledge Consistency Checker on the mailbox servers after replicating the removal of the Dir Rep connector. When I had to do this in the past, I made sure that all servers in each site had replicated and all other sites removed before recreating the Dir Rep connector. Regards S

RE: Problem with dir-rep move

2002-02-06 Thread LSandoval
One problem, the dir rep has already been added back. The funny thing is the other admin added one of the users back on the bridgehead. It replicated successfully to the users servers and then all of the other users disappeared from the list. This is weird. So, he suggested that I add one us

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Ramsay, Steve
I've just emailed my c2c rep about it... -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2002 14:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? Yea I got something 2 days ago from that person. What is up wi

RE: Names not resoling correctly

2002-02-06 Thread Hurst, Paul
Is she sending to a DL in her PAB? If so this is held in the DL and so any changes in the Email address or GAL does not reflect. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [ma

RE: Names not resoling correctly

2002-02-06 Thread LSandoval
Make sure the user logs out of Outlook and back in after update his PAB. I have had Outlook cache the information until logging the client out and back in. Just a thought. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:24 A

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Hurst, Paul
We have OLK2 here but it does not auto compress PST's. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchan

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Hurst, Paul
You need to do a manual compress afterwards. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:22 PM To: Exchange D

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Joyce, Louis
I have a large vice here that I use to compress PST user's heads. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2002 14:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subj

RE: Names not resoling correctly

2002-02-06 Thread Mitchell Mike
Is there a file that is kept on my work station that points to a name list? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Names not resoling correctly Is she sending to a D

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Doug Eubank
What utility are you using to resolve the address and compare to Spam lists? > -Original Message- > From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? > >

Site connector in Exchange 2000

2002-02-06 Thread Robert Blomquist
I have a situation where I need 2 separate forests, in different countries, to share global address lists, and we want something similar to the Exch5.5 site connector (we want internal mail to stay internal and not travel through the internet.) If mail has to flow through the internet in order for

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Andy David
Are the psts local or on the network? -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files We have OLK2 here but it does not auto compress PST's. Cheers Paul Standards are like toot

RE: Procomm and Exchange

2002-02-06 Thread Roger Seielstad
And how many restores did you do from that configuration? How often did you get a corrupt DB? Were you able to restore to a different machine? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA > -Origin

RE: Procomm and Exchange

2002-02-06 Thread Andy David
What is your quest? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Procomm and Exchange And how many restores did you do from that configuration? How often did you get a corrupt DB?

RE: Procomm and Exchange

2002-02-06 Thread Ray Zorz
to follow that star -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Procomm and Exchange What is your quest? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielst

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread John Matteson
>From the same people that bring you MAXCompression. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Ex 5.5 SP 4

2002-02-06 Thread Callan, Chris
Ok, I am downloading Ex 5.5 SP4 for our disaster recovery site, but the web page which holds the files has a number of them. Which ones do I need and what ones should I not even bother with. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://w

RE: Procomm and Exchange

2002-02-06 Thread Morgan, Joshua
And how many restores did you do from that configuration? We did it a few times Basically we took the snapshot then moved it to the other filer's allocated drives. We then used our private Backup network connected via Fiber to backup these unattached Databases. We used a rename script an act

RE: Procomm and Exchange

2002-02-06 Thread QUINN, Chris
To seek the Holy Grail -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2002 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Procomm and Exchange What is your quest? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday

RE: Procomm and Exchange

2002-02-06 Thread Bauer, Mr. Rick
No matter how resistant, is Redmond to new technology (not much of a songwriter, Pancho) As many of you know, we have been using a Network Appliance Filer (NAS) for our storage end to our Exchange (3 server) environment. From 5.5 to Exchange 2000 mixed to fully native, we have watched this pi

RE: Problem with dir-rep move

2002-02-06 Thread Ramsay, Steve
They way I did it was: - Remove Dir Rep Connector - Run KCC on both Bridgeheads (both sites should no longer see each others objects) - Replicate change to all other site servers using intrasite rep then run KCC to remove other sites objects. - Create new Dir Rep Connector, run KCC to create stub

RE: Problem with dir-rep move

2002-02-06 Thread LSandoval
What I am finding is that intersite replication is not working. Any ideas? -Original Message- From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Problem with dir-rep move They way I did it w

PF Replication not working

2002-02-06 Thread Ashraph, Elizabeth A.
Hi, One outcome of the system date change on our Exchange servers, is that intersite public folders replication stopped working on the day of the date change, the time has since been reset, but is there something that else that needs to be reset for PF replication. Thanks. -Liz- -Or

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread RonGrant
Whew, glad it wasn't me. :) My web dude had 16,000 return recites in his inbox this morning. I had three from different folks telling me to clean up my act and stop the spam. The web guy emailed me asking me what was up. Turned out his web server was relaying through his IIS. Not really sure how t

RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts!

2002-02-06 Thread Horst Hinz
We've used the reg hack here for Outlook 2000. Worked for us. -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts!

RE: Enterprise downgrade to Standard

2002-02-06 Thread Hawkins, Stuart
erm...thanks for this its not really the answer in this situation though, as we have no need for the enterprise features, and the cost implications are very significant. anyone loaded an enterprise DB into 5.5 standard ? Stuart Hawkins Network Systems Manager Bovis Homes Limited Cheltenham, UK Te

RE: Experience poll 20,000 users

2002-02-06 Thread Darcy Adams
As part of the team responsible for a nearly 200K rollout, I'd say it really depends on the architecture of the company. 7K users can be just as difficult as 20K. Or, 20K can be pure hell compared to that measly 7K you've been managing. More likely, though, with a 20K implementation you'll ha

RE: Limit outgoing size by destination domain?

2002-02-06 Thread Exchange Discussions
Thanks!! -- Dustin -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 5, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Limit outgoing size by destination domain? Here it is...you owe me one. ~Jim === That won'

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Darcy Adams
I haven't seen any sign of it on my .pst's - I compress manually [1] occasionally, and often get back quite a bit of space. Darcy [1] Don't get excited Andy, it's the .pst's that I compress. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 20

text messages are trunkcated

2002-02-06 Thread richard . lanci
the environment is exchange 5.5 sp3, NT4, sp6a, mailsweeper 4.2_1, outlook 2000 a few users are complaining that they are not getting a 4 page TXT file. if the e-mail goes to a yahoo.com or hotmail.com address, they will get the 4 pages. I have called mailsweeper tech support and went thru a fe

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Andy David
I didnt say it worked! But it supposed to work automagically in the background. Just curious, are your psts local or on the network? -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST fil

RE: Problem with dir-rep move

2002-02-06 Thread Ramsay, Steve
..yet you can see recipients from Site B on the GAL in Site A? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2002 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem with dir-rep move What I am finding is that intersite replication is not worki

RE: Ex 5.5 SP 4

2002-02-06 Thread Ed Crowley
Has a number of what? Which what do you need? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Callan, Chris Sent: Wedne

RE: Procomm and Exchange

2002-02-06 Thread Ed Crowley
I fart in your general direction. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of QUINN, Chris Sent: Wednesday, February

RE: Procomm and Exchange

2002-02-06 Thread Roger Seielstad
The only thing I've got to say is that the only IS issues I've EVER experienced have been due to disk subsystem issues. So, if you've had IS problems, the natural conclusion would be that it's the disk subsystem. To me its must less an issue of the databases being on a NAS, and much more an issue

RE: Problem with dir-rep move

2002-02-06 Thread LSandoval
Yes... Ok I did more testing here and after I added one of the missing members to the bridgehead, I forced an update from server A (I had waited an hour for intersite replication to happen and nada, so I pulled an update to force it). The new member was added and the other members disappeared.

RE: Ex 5.5 SP 4

2002-02-06 Thread Joyce, Louis
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/55/sp4dl_en.asp?FinishURL=%2Fdow nloads%2Frelease%2Easp%3FReleaseID%3D25492%26area%3Dsearch%26ordinal%3D21%26 redirect%3Dno Watch the word wrap. Download them all Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions

RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving m e nu ts!

2002-02-06 Thread Candee Vaglica
Have you installed the security patch for Outlook 2000? Q259228 Q296065 -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 7:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving

RE: Experience poll 20,000 users

2002-02-06 Thread Ed Crowley
I would say that all differences are strictly arbitrary. In fact, working at a 20,000-person company (or even larger) might give you LESS relevant experience because administrators are often less broadly exposed to their environments. For example, in some large environments, an Exchange 2000 adm

RE: Ex 5.5 SP 4

2002-02-06 Thread Callan, Chris
Has a number of files to be downloaded. Which ones do I need to bother with. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 SP 4 Has a number of what? Which what do you need? Ed C

RE: text messages are trunkcated

2002-02-06 Thread Ed Crowley
The problem statement is incomplete or confusing. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: second exchange server !

2002-02-06 Thread Ed Crowley
Tell us about your domain structure. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Torben Hansen Sent: Friday, Februar

RE: text messages are trunkcated

2002-02-06 Thread richard . lanci
user A (who works at a radio or tv station) sends a plain text message to users B (my co-worker and me) and to user C (yahoo.com address). user C gets the complete message (when printed is about 4 pages). users B gets 1 or 2 pages, when printed. _

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Darcy Adams
Local. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files I didnt say it worked! But it supposed to work automagically in the background. Just curious, are your psts local or on the

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Ken Cornetet
Nope, I got one too, and I didn't go to MEC2001. I was at 2000, though... -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? I did; I just assumed

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Mood, Steve
Me too, and never been to a MEC -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? Nope, I got one too, and I didn't go to MEC2001. I was at 200

RE: Experience poll 20,000 users

2002-02-06 Thread Chris Scharff
Just tell them the 20k user experience thing is bogus and if they disagree, bring them around to your way of thinking with ThE sTiCk[tm]. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[E

RE: PST files

2002-02-06 Thread Martin Blackstone
Locals only!! -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST files Local. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:

RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5.

2002-02-06 Thread John Strongosky
Thanks for all your input, my manager is going to put this out at the Executive Managers Meeting as well as an email to everyone. I agree with Sent Items and Deleted Items, but they want Inbox as well and then they are going for the rest of the Mailbox.Is there a best time to run this? I've g

OWA 2000, 404 File not found

2002-02-06 Thread Andrey Fyodorov
Hi, I am trying to do something that is supposed to work - create a vitual OWA directory that will only service users whose e-mail address ends with @domainABC.com All the users have e-mail address ending with @maindomain.com Some users have secondary e-mail address ending with @domainABC.com (t

RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5.

2002-02-06 Thread HANNA, Keith (TSL Shirley)
Our policy is for 60 days, but is only run once a week (on a sunday). Keith -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2002 17:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5. Thanks for al

RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5.

2002-02-06 Thread Martin Blackstone
Once a week on Sundays? Say 5AM -Original Message- From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5. Thanks for all your input, my manager is go

DS hangs with event 1186

2002-02-06 Thread Tim Evans
I've running Exchange 5.5 service pack 3, 2 servers in a single site. The 2 servers are connected together via an OC3, so bandwidth shouldn't be an issue. One of my servers occasionally stops responding. None of the services stop, they just stop responding. The only indication I've found that this

RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5.

2002-02-06 Thread Ed Crowley
Just point out that malcontents won't follow the policy and copy their "evidence" into a PST or print it out, while your policy will have destroyed all "evidence" in your company's favor. When your company is sued by a malcontent employee, remember that I told you so. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MV

RE: text messages are trunkcated

2002-02-06 Thread Ed Crowley
What is lost? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:13

RE: DS hangs with event 1186

2002-02-06 Thread Ed Crowley
Single site or multiple sites? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Evans Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2

RE: Ex 5.5 SP 4

2002-02-06 Thread Ed Crowley
Generally, you need only one. If you list them in your message, I'll try to help you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: DS hangs with event 1186

2002-02-06 Thread Tim Evans
single site Tim Evans, Sparling 206-667-0509, fax 206-667-0554 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:23 AM To: Tim Evans Subject: RE: DS hangs with event 1186 Single site or multiple sites? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP

Re: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Guy
I though about going. If C2C works with the psychic network, maybe I'll get one. - Original Message - From: "Mood, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:28 PM Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this go

RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?

2002-02-06 Thread Freese, Roberta
Yes, got one yesterday evening. I wrote Jon to complain about his spam (again [1]) and I copied the abuse mailboxes at sprint.net [2] and at crocker.com. I got 2 apologies from Jon; the extra one is probably because either he reads the role accounts for crocker or whoever does read them is fo

RE: Supporting Outlook as an Exchange Admin - Poll

2002-02-06 Thread Garrish, Robert B.
Dear Ron, I am third level support for Outlook 2000. First Level = PC Hotline (help desk) Second Level = PC and Laptop Technicians (I teach / train them regularly) Third Level = Exchange Admin (me) Any time a "new client issue" shows up, I document the "fix" and place the MS Wor

RE: Ex 5.5 SP 4

2002-02-06 Thread McBee, Jim
Chris: You probably only need the SP4_550I.EXE, which is the core files that updates the 5.5 server. The SP4_55SS1.EXE includes the files you find in the \SUPPORT directory. There a number of hotfixes for Exchange 5.5 SP4 (you need SP4 first!) that you can download from http://

Re: Experience poll 20,000 users

2002-02-06 Thread Tony Hlabse
Ed come to think of it I used to know someone in the company and they did mention that. What they want is someone to do the day to day admin. stuff (what ever they think that is), while they migrate from 5.5 to 2000. Would love to involved with that project. Nice to put on the old resume. - O

Problems with change the password in OWA

2002-02-06 Thread Moises A. Zamora V.
Hi, I'm trying to change the password in OWA but displays this message when click the OK button. Internet Service Manager for Internet Information Server 5.0 Access is denied. Back to http://server_name/exchange/mzamora/?Cmd=close Like the normal users don't have the privileges to change t

Exchange 2000 Software Question

2002-02-06 Thread Pillai, Raj
I am trying to do domainprep and forestprep on a w2k server, however the exchange 2000 CD I am using does not have these options. Did some digging on the Microsoft site and it says something about a Release Candidate 2 (RC2) or RTM version of E2K. Is this different than standard edition ?

RE: MTA Problems?

2002-02-06 Thread Garrish, Robert B.
Dear Tim, http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q296879 (link may wrap) Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Kalligonis, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 02:44 PM To: Exchan

  1   2   3   >