Depending on the storage device you are using you should realy have a look at the
mediapools in computer admininstration of w2k. It took me some time to find out, how
and that tapes are controlled in a library in win2k.
regards
Elmer
--
Elmer Stöwer
CyberConsult - Beratungsgesellschaft für
I never went to MEC01 and I got it
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 February 2002 22:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
I did; I just assumed it was marketing drivel from MEC01.
Neither did I and I got it.
What's Exchange?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 February 2002 10:01
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else
If you cannot get the Information Store consistent by any other means
and you have no backup, then your only option is to run a eseutil /p
which will force the database consistent. Be prepared to lose some mail.
You may also need to run isinteg to fix the pointers in the store as
well. If you go
Also, When I send mail it returns back with 605 error. Any idea
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Faxination
Ummm. I looked at the FAQ on their site found
I recently applied for a job which requires experience with at least 20,000
users. The job would be as a Exchange Admin. , part of a team. They said I
have all the qualifications except no 20,000 environment experience. Even
though over the past 5 years I have had experience at sites ranging from
I was involved in a 25,000+ user rollout on 5.5 ... typically, the difference lay in
the use and function of servers (e.g. dedicated bridgeheads for X400 and SMTP traffic)
other elements to consider were working within the constraints of the NT4.0
domain model and how this might impact
Or it will blow up.
Listen to what the man said. Call PSS.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Databases in an inconsistent state
If you cannot get the Information
Exchange 5.5 SP4, Outlook 98, NT 4.0 SP6. We have a user who recently left
the company. He has
a PST file on his home drive. A user who has taken over his
responsibilities wants to add the PST folder
to their Outlook box. If you right click on the PST file and check
properties, it says that
I have worked in an environment with 30,000 users and 30 servers. The big
difference I have seen between large and small environments, is the large
environment had no exceptions, had their processes and procedures
streamlined, had a team of 12, had change control, and new their stuff
really
Ed,
In this particular case, would you recommend a Brick-level Backup as an
additional precaution ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 February 2002 02:21
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ed Server Move Method - Corrupt Priv edb
You might
Exchange is where you go to change euros into dollars.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
Neither
Same here.
Dot Harris
Exchange Administrator
William Blair Company, L.L.C.
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
Besides the usual read the Disaster Recovery White Papers, check out
Q300439 for command line switches to use w/ NTBackup. Just use the wizard
to setup an Exchange backup and change the command line it creates to suit
your needs.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SlipStick is da bomb..!
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving
m e nu ts!
GOT IT - Thanks
The SlipStick
Use to work at 110,000 user exchange site, had Email Admins all around the
world. We could never run it from one Email admin group (KM security,
rebuilds, servers doing one function etc), maybe they are referring to
working with multiply Email Admins groups on the same system but time zoned
Not yet. Still soldiering on with the pound.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 February 2002 13:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else get
The PST has been cleared down, this is the white space/marked deleted items
taking up the space. Now if you had a util to undelete deleted PST email
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original
So PST files never reduce in size, regardless if everything is deleted?
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files
The PST has been cleared down, this is the white
My experience has been that if you delete data from a .pst file, you must
compress the .pst file to regain the space.
LaCretia
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Mine too. I have heard rumor that in Outlook2K and higher, it automatically
compresses the PST, but I can neither comfirm nor deny that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
The original user may have deleted everything out of it before leaving
(common move).
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PST files
Exchange 5.5 SP4, Outlook 98, NT 4.0 SP6.
Well, there you go.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files
No, we have Outlook2K and I still have to compress the file to get the space
back.
LaCretia
Let's see if I can explain this. We moved a dir rep connector over the
weekend and during such a move all users on that dir rep should lose their
membership to any distribution lists. This occurred on the bridgehead
server and therefore the admin felt the dir rep move was successful. On
Actually I think you are right Martin, automatic background compression has
been around since Outlook 98.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files
Well, there you
I have all the servers stuff but I need CISCO images, does anyone have a
stash of routers and switches .jpg's I can use.
thanks in advance
/s/ Frank W. Vans Evers, SAIC, LINCS Support,
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
http://www.microsoft.com/office/visio/
-Original Message-
From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Need to diagram my servers/exchange other and network devices
I have all the servers stuff
It is hard for me to confirm. I try to avoid PSTs, and the ones I have are
huge anyhow (listserv archives).
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files
Actually I think you
Yes we have several users who freaked out when their hard drives were
constantly active for no reason. After forcing a foreground compression
the activity stopped. This was a long time ago - I don't remember the
version of outlook.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Andy David
I got one, addressed to the smtp address I use for this list - NOT the
address I gave to vendors at MEC...
-Original Message-
From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 5:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by
That's true... also if its a greenfields project and involves workstations as well as
servers then you're likely to find a separate project team with its own project life
cycle for deployment, design and testing teams and separate rollout teams. They may
just have decided to 'scope' anyone
Good morning,
Outlook 98. Exchange 5.5 Sp4
I have an instance where a user keys in a name in the to: box and the name
resolves. But once the message goes out it is returned because of a bad
address. The person swears they are using the global address list. I have
no problems with the list.
Try running the Knowledge Consistency Checker on the mailbox servers after
replicating the removal of the Dir Rep connector.
When I had to do this in the past, I made sure that all servers in each site
had replicated and all other sites removed before recreating the Dir Rep
connector.
Regards
One problem, the dir rep has already been added back. The funny thing is
the other admin added one of the users back on the bridgehead. It
replicated successfully to the users servers and then all of the other users
disappeared from the list. This is weird.
So, he suggested that I add one
I've just emailed my c2c rep about it...
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 February 2002 14:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
Yea I got something 2 days ago from that person. What is up
Make sure the user logs out of Outlook and back in after update his PAB. I
have had Outlook cache the information until logging the client out and back
in. Just a thought.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:24
We have OLK2 here but it does not auto compress PST's.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:49 PM
To:
You need to do a manual compress afterwards.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everybody agrees you should have one,
but no one wants to use yours
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:22 PM
To: Exchange
I have a large vice here that I use to compress PST user's heads.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 February 2002 14:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Is there a file that is kept on my work station that points to a name list?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Names not resoling correctly
Is she sending to a
I have a situation where I need 2 separate forests, in different countries,
to share global address lists, and we want something similar to the Exch5.5
site connector (we want internal mail to stay internal and not travel
through the internet.) If mail has to flow through the internet in order
Are the psts local or on the network?
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files
We have OLK2 here but it does not auto compress PST's.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like
And how many restores did you do from that configuration?
How often did you get a corrupt DB?
Were you able to restore to a different machine?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
What is your quest?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Procomm and Exchange
And how many restores did you do from that configuration?
How often did you get a corrupt DB?
to follow that star
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Procomm and Exchange
What is your quest?
-Original Message-
From: Roger
Ok, I am downloading Ex 5.5 SP4 for our disaster recovery site, but the web
page which holds the files has a number of them. Which ones do I need and
what ones should I not even bother with.
Chris
_
List posting FAQ:
And how many restores did you do from that configuration?
We did it a few times
Basically we took the snapshot then moved it to the other filer's allocated
drives. We then used our private Backup network connected via Fiber to
backup these unattached Databases. We used a rename script an
To seek the Holy Grail
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 February 2002 14:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Procomm and Exchange
What is your quest?
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
No matter how resistant, is Redmond to new technology
(not much of a songwriter, Pancho)
As many of you know, we have been using a Network Appliance Filer (NAS)
for our storage end to our Exchange (3 server) environment. From 5.5 to
Exchange 2000 mixed to fully native, we have watched this
What I am finding is that intersite replication is not working. Any ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Ramsay, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Problem with dir-rep move
They way I did it
Hi,
One outcome of the system date change on our Exchange servers, is that
intersite public folders replication stopped working on the day of the date
change, the time has since been reset, but is there something that else that
needs to be reset for PF replication. Thanks.
-Liz-
Whew, glad it wasn't me. :) My web dude had 16,000 return recites in his
inbox this morning. I had three from different folks telling me to clean up
my act and stop the spam. The web guy emailed me asking me what was up.
Turned out his web server was relaying through his IIS. Not really sure how
We've used the reg hack here for Outlook 2000. Worked for us.
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving
m e nu ts!
erm...thanks for this
its not really the answer in this situation though, as we have no need for
the enterprise features, and the cost implications are very significant.
anyone loaded an enterprise DB into 5.5 standard ?
Stuart Hawkins
Network Systems Manager
Bovis Homes Limited
Cheltenham, UK
As part of the team responsible for a nearly 200K rollout, I'd say it really depends
on the architecture of the company. 7K users can be just as difficult as 20K. Or,
20K can be pure hell compared to that measly 7K you've been managing.
More likely, though, with a 20K implementation you'll
Thanks!!
--
Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: February 5, 2002 4:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Limit outgoing size by destination domain?
Here it is...you owe me one.
~Jim
===
That
I haven't seen any sign of it on my .pst's - I compress manually [1] occasionally, and
often get back quite a bit of space.
Darcy
[1] Don't get excited Andy, it's the .pst's that I compress.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06,
the environment is exchange 5.5 sp3, NT4, sp6a, mailsweeper 4.2_1, outlook
2000
a few users are complaining that they are not getting a 4 page TXT file.
if the e-mail goes to a yahoo.com or hotmail.com address, they will get
the 4 pages. I have called mailsweeper tech support and went thru a
I didnt say it worked!
But it supposed to work automagically in the background.
Just curious, are your psts local or on the network?
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST
..yet you can see recipients from Site B on the GAL in Site A?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 February 2002 15:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problem with dir-rep move
What I am finding is that intersite replication is not
Has a number of what? Which what do you need?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Callan, Chris
Sent:
I fart in your general direction.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of QUINN, Chris
Sent: Wednesday,
The only thing I've got to say is that the only IS issues I've EVER
experienced have been due to disk subsystem issues.
So, if you've had IS problems, the natural conclusion would be that it's the
disk subsystem. To me its must less an issue of the databases being on a
NAS, and much more an
Yes...
Ok I did more testing here and after I added one of the missing members to
the bridgehead, I forced an update from server A (I had waited an hour for
intersite replication to happen and nada, so I pulled an update to force
it). The new member was added and the other members disappeared.
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/downloads/55/sp4dl_en.asp?FinishURL=%2Fdow
nloads%2Frelease%2Easp%3FReleaseID%3D25492%26area%3Dsearch%26ordinal%3D21%26
redirect%3Dno
Watch the word wrap.
Download them all
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
Have you installed the security patch for Outlook 2000?
Q259228
Q296065
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 7:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - Outlook 2000 attachment filtering is driving
I would say that all differences are strictly arbitrary. In fact,
working at a 20,000-person company (or even larger) might give you LESS
relevant experience because administrators are often less broadly
exposed to their environments. For example, in some large environments,
an Exchange 2000
Has a number of files to be downloaded. Which ones do I need to bother
with.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 SP 4
Has a number of what? Which what do you need?
Ed
The problem statement is incomplete or confusing.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tell us about your domain structure.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Torben Hansen
Sent: Friday,
user A (who works at a radio or tv station) sends a plain text message to
users B (my co-worker and me) and to user C (yahoo.com address). user C
gets the complete message (when printed is about 4 pages). users B gets 1
or 2 pages, when printed.
Local.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files
I didnt say it worked!
But it supposed to work automagically in the background.
Just curious, are your psts local or on
Nope, I got one too, and I didn't go to MEC2001. I was at 2000, though...
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
I did; I just assumed
Me too, and never been to a MEC
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
Nope, I got one too, and I didn't go to MEC2001. I was at
Just tell them the 20k user experience thing is bogus and if they disagree,
bring them around to your way of thinking with ThE sTiCk[tm].
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse
Locals only!!
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: PST files
Local.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002
Thanks for all your input, my manager is going to put this out at the
Executive Managers Meeting as well as an email to everyone. I agree with
Sent Items and Deleted Items, but they want Inbox as well and then they are
going for the rest of the Mailbox.Is there a best time to run this?
I've
Hi,
I am trying to do something that is supposed to work - create a vitual OWA
directory that will only service users whose e-mail address ends with
@domainABC.com
All the users have e-mail address ending with @maindomain.com
Some users have secondary e-mail address ending with @domainABC.com
Our policy is for 60 days, but is only run once a week (on a sunday).
Keith
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 06 February 2002 17:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange
5.5.
Thanks for
Once a week on Sundays? Say 5AM
-Original Message-
From: John Strongosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Any Best Practices using the Mailbox Manager in Exchange 5.5.
Thanks for all your input, my manager is
I've running Exchange 5.5 service pack 3, 2 servers in a single site. The
2 servers are connected together via an OC3, so bandwidth shouldn't be an
issue. One of my servers occasionally stops responding. None of the
services stop, they just stop responding. The only indication I've found
that
Just point out that malcontents won't follow the policy and copy their
evidence into a PST or print it out, while your policy will have
destroyed all evidence in your company's favor. When your company is
sued by a malcontent employee, remember that I told you so.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
What is lost?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:13
Single site or multiple sites?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim Evans
Sent: Wednesday, February 06,
Generally, you need only one. If you list them in your message, I'll
try to help you.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
single site
Tim Evans, Sparling
206-667-0509, fax 206-667-0554
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Tim Evans
Subject: RE: DS hangs with event 1186
Single site or multiple sites?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet
I though about going. If C2C works with the psychic network, maybe I'll get
one.
- Original Message -
From: Mood, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:28 PM
Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
Yes, got one yesterday evening.
I wrote Jon to complain about his spam (again [1]) and I copied the abuse
mailboxes at sprint.net [2] and at crocker.com. I got 2 apologies from Jon;
the extra one is probably because either he reads the role accounts for
crocker or whoever does read them is
Dear Ron,
I am third level support for Outlook 2000.
First Level = PC Hotline (help desk)
Second Level = PC and Laptop Technicians (I teach / train them regularly)
Third Level = Exchange Admin (me)
Any time a new client issue shows up, I document the fix and
place the MS Word
Chris:
You probably only need the SP4_550I.EXE, which is the core files
that updates the 5.5 server. The SP4_55SS1.EXE includes the files you
find in the \SUPPORT directory.
There a number of hotfixes for Exchange 5.5 SP4 (you need SP4
first!) that you can download from
Ed come to think of it I used to know someone in the company and they did
mention that. What they want is someone to do the day to day admin. stuff
(what ever they think that is), while they migrate from 5.5 to 2000. Would
love to involved with that project. Nice to put on the old resume.
-
Hi,
I'm trying to change the password in OWA but displays this message when
click the OK button.
Internet Service Manager
for Internet Information Server 5.0
Access is denied.
Back to http://server_name/exchange/mzamora/?Cmd=close
Like the normal users don't have the privileges to change
I am trying to do domainprep and forestprep on a w2k server, however the
exchange 2000 CD I am using does not have these options. Did some digging on
the Microsoft site and it says something about a Release Candidate 2 (RC2)
or RTM version of E2K. Is this different than standard edition
Dear Tim,
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q296879
(link may wrap)
Rob Garrish
Exchange Administrator
Wawa Inc.
610-558-8371
-Original Message-
From: Kalligonis, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 02:44 PM
To:
What happens when you type in setup/forestprep ?
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 1:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 Software Question
I am trying to do domainprep and forestprep on a w2k
Nothing at all, there is no forestprep option under setup/, unless I am
missing something.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question
What happens when
How about setup/forestgump?
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Software Question
What happens when you type in setup/forestprep ?
-Original Message-
Under 5.5 it was easy: The routing Tab in the Internet mail connector
allowed for specification of additional e-mail domains to be treated as
inbound or re-routed into another domain name. And worked instantly after
IMC restart.
The Recipient policy is supposed to go into its place. I need
we administer our ex server from terminal services and have to twice
weekly close several incidences of mmc.exe. for some reason it wont close
on it's own. whazzup wid dat?
_
List posting FAQ:
We have installed our Active Directory Connector and created connection
agreements for each of our sites. For each site there is a two-way
primary CA for recipients, DLs, and Resources; a secondary CA one way from
Active Directory back to exchange; and finally a Public Folder CA, which
is
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
