I remember having had this issue with service packs on my admin win2k box.
Something related to different security DLLs level.
It has been already discussed in the list not too long ago, check the
archives.
HTH
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:bmellott;SND.com]
The SMTP address exists as the from address for outbound NDRs.
You still have to configure an inbound mailbox to receive
[EMAIL PROTECTED] email.
You server will still run fine without doing that.
I bet...it can be captured, a little sink d'event and eau de toillette,
and we can change the
We've had a strange problem this week, maybe anybody has seen a similiar
thing before. We noticed Outlook clients starting to open Netbios sessions
over port 139 on two of our Exchange servers. Version used are 5.5 SP3 and
Outlook 2000.
Normally Outlook sends a request on port 135 and gets two
Hi Guys
Was wondering if anyone is aware of a way of finding out all our hosts MAC
addresses
from NT4 server. I can get a list of host names to IP addresses from
WINS/DHCP etc,
Anyone know of a way?
Thnx
David
CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE
This communication contains information which is confidential
Hello,
You cannot use Outlook's Net Folders feature if you are also connecting to an
Exchange server; it's either one or the other. If you aren't using Exchange,
then contact me off list. I had a lot of experience with them before
switching to using Exchange.
BTW: The Net Folders feature was
we have a dialup connection to our ISP for downloading mail, however its
been very flaky and intermittently connects and sometimes it doesnt. You
can hear teh moddem dialout fine and making a connection.
the errors we get are:
0x0318 Pop response -ERR authorization failed
0x033b Socket
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: 07 November 2002 18:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Computing issues like say... an RBL?
I meant lots of other computing issues as well as...
I applaud your amazing insight.
And
Ed,
JFYI It would seem in the EU that soon it might be a legal requirement for
companies to retain email forever, to stop the old 'well we have a policy
that says deleted old emails so you can't sue us for a dodgy email' excuse.
A whole new meaning to point 2 for us.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are
Yes,
When the original email placed into the PST didn't originate from Exchange
email address system.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:John.Bowles;celera.com]
Sent: 07 November 2002 19:37
IIRC, the only way to do that is to write a transport sink.
It *might* be possible to change the primary DNS domain of the Exchange
server, and have that perform the correct rejects, but I don't know what the
real implications of doing that are.
Public folders, with the exception of those with scripts associated to them,
never send mail - they only receive.
The Exchange model is that the primary mailbox is the default sending
address, unless specifically told otherwise (through the from: field).
I believe it is possible to do what you
You know, its not a great solution, but you could always block UDP packets
from the Exchange box back to the machine. IPSec filters should be able to
handle that. That would block the new mail notificaitons entirely, however.
--
Roger D.
get into. Regardless you can argue the fact that more competition only
creates better products
That's not a hard and fast economics law, Hummert. All one has to do is look
at local utility (telephone, gas, electricity) deregulation to see that
compettion isn't always what its cracked up to be.
Generally caused by a permissions error - the logged on account doesn't have
appropriate permissions to Exchange.
Alternately, I've seen that come back when your account isn't a local admin
on the box, because the Exchange admin needs write access to a file (can't
remember the name, though) to
Not entirely true. At least in Ex5.5, If you don't associate postmaster@
with a specific mailbox, it sends all postmaster@ to the administrators
mailbox set in the IMC
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly
Yeah. Stop using ports 1250 and 1251 and use something much higher.
TCP/IP outbound connects, of which there are a number during system booting
(for things like authentication connects, etc) all receive ephemeral ports
starting at 1024 and going up. I often see ports in the 1300's shortly after
Those are, IIRC, client side generated. Else, they wouldn't work while
working in offline mode.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From:
Roger,
I assume you are refering to send to unique emails addresses, as the PF
'folder assistant' will allow you to reply/forward or reply with template.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
Folder assistant is basically just an automated script creator, so I lumped
the two of them together mentally.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original
I was logging in with the domain administrator account.
Background:
Ghosted server from one machine to another. From IDE drive machine to scsi
raid. Had to Run W2K svr cd cause Boot Inaccess...
W2K svr.
Added machine back into domain. Got Exchange error
Unload exchange admin, regclean,
Yes she is.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 8:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Yeah, Baker is okay too.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the
Dear all,
How, using Exchange command-line import, can we set values in the
Permissions and Delivery Restrictions fields, and how can a single value
be removed from a multi-value field (such as Permissions or Members) ?
Exchange 5.5, NT4 sp6 etc.
Many thanks
Vanessa Watkins
Royal Holloway,
apparently so--you and others
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 7:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
*yawn*
-Original Message-
From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:JDillon;s-3.com]
Sent: Thursday, November
iNNERHOST - http://www.innerhost.com
-Original Message-
From: Henley, John K (Johnny), METRO [mailto:jkhenley;att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: somewhat OT
Who all is left in the Hosted E2K (asp-model) game?
USA.NET?
MI8?
Critical
Durkee, Peter wrote:
| Oh come on people, don't be deliberately thick. It's not that the word DVD is evil,
|it's just
that the topic holds a great deal
| of fascination among spammers. Not unlike, say, mortgages.
|
| -Peter
Not thick - funny. I get a kick out of these fun threads.
Speaking
HAHAHAHAHA - RIGHT! Because I can't count all the free sh*t I've been legitimately
offered! I'd
hate to miss out! [1]
;-)
Alex
[1] - Dripping sarcasm
Christopher Hummert wrote:
| Yea but what about the legitimate e-mails that contain DVD on them that
| their missing. Like say Microsoft
Nothing has ever improved through apathy.
Andy David wrote:
| *yawn*
|
|
| -Original Message-
| From: Dillon, Jeff [mailto:JDillon;s-3.com]
| Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 5:32 PM
| To: Exchange Discussions
| Subject: RE: RBL's
|
|
| The Republican Imperialist Evangelical Army
It's a new feature of DCMA and Palladium. References to copyrighted
material must be apropriately licensed from the entertaiment industry or
it's morally the same as emptying your Granny's bank account to buy and
!, don't you know...
Jim Helfer
::-Original Message-
::From:
Subject says it all.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List
Insane for McDonald's to have their coffee so hot... :P
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 07,
Go look at Power Tools from www.nemX.com . There are many more like Scan
mail from trend Micro, it's like AV, everyone will like or hate some brand.
I like Nemx because if didn't really have to change any DLL's or anything,
went in very smooth and slick.
-Original Message-
From: Kleciak,
And this relates to this discussion group and Exchange how?
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:David.Lloyd;which.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NT 4 resolution
Hi Guys
Was wondering if anyone is aware of a way
I'm pretty sure that the return address that it uses when it builds an
NDR is the Primary SMTP address in the default recipient policy. I don't
think you can customize it so that the postmaster domain changes
depending on the domain of the intended recipient.
A possible workaround may be to all
Try rebuilding the box and doing an online restore of all except the dir. Then use
the DS/IS consistency adjuster to rebuild the dir (Advanced tab in server's
properties). I'm pretty sure the E55 DR whitepaper discusses this.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill
I just want to change it once, I don't want it to be dynamic. For
instance, I want it to be from Domain2.com instead of domain1.com all
the time.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Hitchcock [mailto:hitchcock;berbee.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
I think it will end when spam ends and when pigs fly...
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Steven A. Christensen [mailto:hawkinoz;hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Will the RBL thread never end
Subject says it all.
Hmmm. . . nope. I don't think that's a good idea. It's just this one situation where
it's a problem. And they *want* the new mail notifications. Just not that silly
envelope in the task bar. If I blocked new mail notifications I'd have about 700
users screaming for my blood.
I've
Its not easy. I believe the easiest way to do it is to export the data,
massage it to remove what you don't want, then reimport it with the option
to overwrite rather than append for multivalued fields
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems
here's an easy way if you don't have many hosts:
ping four or five hosts
arp -a
ping the next four or five
arp -a
repeat
-Original Message-
From: David Lloyd [mailto:David.Lloyd;which.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NT 4 resolution
Hi
Yeah, like how MSDN is availble on DVD. Wouldn't want to get THOSE
emails...
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:DurkeeP;LanePowell.com]
Sent:
Except the ability to suppress the envelope icon. :P
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 6:07 PM
To:
yeah I know rebuilding the box will fix the comm issues it's having...
PS yes I could RPCping the exchange server OK from this machine...very weird
Im sure its some whacked reg thing'y or something..
I was hoping to figure out how to fix it...and not to rebuild it ...because
of all the other
That's been my experience. I've had several situations where I was changing DL
memberships via import, and the best option has always been to use overwrite if I
had to remove members.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com]
Sent: Friday,
Then I think you will need to change it on the default recipient policy.
Proceed with caution!!! This has the potential to change the address on
several system level objects such as the public information store and
I'm sure there are others. I've seen situations where the default
recipient
Has anyone on this list used Microsoft LONGHORN yet and if so is there a
link on microsofts website that you can sign up as a beta tester.
RIch
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
You can always go to betaplace.com and try to get in the program but
your chances are very slim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT:
Haven't seen it before. Is SP4 on your radar for the Exchange server in
question?
-Original Message-
From: Luck, Sönke [mailto:soenkeluck;kpmg.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
We've had a strange problem this week, maybe anybody has seen a
Looks like you are using a POP3 connector to retrieve mail rather than a
method like ETRN. I've never used a POP3 connector, but since it's really
nothing more than a POP3 client, it sounds like the user/pass combination is
failing for some reason.
-Original Message-
From: Kulwinder
If that happened, I'd imagine a large number of EU companies would take mail
away from all nonessential employees.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:Paul.Hurst;eu.sony.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 5:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Ed,
JFYI It would seem in the
I was logging in with the domain administrator account
My domain admin account doesn't have Exchange admin permissions, so it'd
create this error every time, however...
Check the following files.
How to determine if you are using 56bit or 128 bit encryption on
SECURITY.DLL , NTLMSSPS.DLL and
Just to let you all know one of our customer got hit with the
Friend-Greeting virus a little bit ago. From what I have learned Trend is
the only one talking about this now and are calling it FRIENDGRT.B.
The actions we are taking are blocking the following domain at the firewall
I'm still going to forward this to our Help Desk. I warned them, and our security and
network teams, about it when it first came around. A few days later our Security team
sent out a notice that it had made it in and infected some desktops.
HELLOOO!! Desktop support - I SENT YOU the FRIGGIN
Chris that's an idea..
Of course Ive wiped the machine now.
I could reload the ghost image for kicks and try it.
One Q: for kicks I checked my term W2K Pro (which has ech55 admin ..work
fine) ie.ethe SECURITY.DLL only shows me the version number not any of the
text you indicate.
Should I ref by
You've hit the major players. The entire email hosting business has pretty
much flopped and consolidated. Critical Path handed over its hosted
corporate messaging services to HP. United Messaging was acquired by
Agilera. Commtouch sold its hosted Exchange business to TeleComputing.
USA.NET and
Maybe they didnt notice the little envelope icon in the system tray...
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus heads up
I'm still going to forward this to our Help
I haven't heard of this one myself until today (does that make me a bad
admin - shoot no.) I did see info on the FriendGrt.A.
As for not being technically a virus my only answer to that is . . a rose
is a rose is a rose, or a virus is a virus is a virus. Whether that be a
chain letter or a
Funny, an AV rep just recently was quoted as saying
We don't call everything a virus because when you go to the doctor you
don't want him telling you that every illness you have is a broken leg.
--
be - MOS
It is better to give than to lend, and it costs about the same.
-Original
There are two (2) actually. Friend-Greeting.com and Friend-Greetings.com.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus heads up
Just to let you all know one of our
ROFL They really are pretty good folks, but sometimes you have to hit them with a
brick to get them to notice things.
What irked me about this was that well after I had alerted the department to this
problem, the security group issued a warning *after* a user managed to get infected
with
I forgot to provide attribution to those steps... it was Peter Peedu from MS
who suggested it in the public newsgroups. I don't know anything about it
other than it has worked for a couple of people.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:bmellott;SND.com]
Sent: Friday,
They upgraded to OL XP and had it turned off, of course!
::-Original Message-
::From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com]
::Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:26 PM
::To: Exchange Discussions
::Subject: RE: Virus heads up
::
::
::Maybe they didnt notice the little envelope icon in
From my perspective, such legal requirements are short sighted. We have
them in scattered places today, and it is usually a mistake.
Occasionally some good comes out of archiving such stuff, but it has to be
ok to use e-mail as an informal ad hoc communications tool. Setting it up
as a
Hmm. . .so, then what are the implications of the new Tablet PC's? All those meeting
notes in electronic form - another gold mine for the lawyers.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler;boeing.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:40 AM
To: Exchange
Hi. Of course.
No good can come from making it a legal requirement to same everything that
people want to throw away.
Dumpster diving is dumpster diving, and it always stinks - imho.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams;gettyimages.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08,
Very good point Geoff. Thanks for the correction.
--
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards
Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2002 11:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Virus heads up
There are two (2) actually. Friend-Greeting.com and
I was blocking them by the original subject line, but there's a new subject line
making the rounds this morning, which is possibly why it's popular gain. Previously
they all had the subject * you have an E-card from *, but now there's an
* you have a greeting card from *
You can use DHCPCMD from the resource kit to dump a list of DHCP assigned
IP's with their associated Names and MAC addresses to a text file...
Joe Pochedley
In the end, if you have cables like
spaghetti on the floor and things only
connect when you swear at them, your
network is perfectly normal.
I think theres also one www.friendgreetings.com
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Virus heads up
Very good point Geoff. Thanks for the correction.
--
From:
We provide Exchange for $9.95 per month per mailbox. We also provide Imail (POP3/IMAP)
as a part of Web hosting or SQL DB hosting package.
We do not split a customer's domain name between Exchange and Imail. To have a
seamless service, all mailboxes have to be either on Exchange or on Imail.
I don't think this marked has failed. We get new orders for Exchange hosting all the
time.
Shared Exchange hosting has some limitations compared to running in-house Exchange
server. So those who can run it in-house and do not want to deal with limitations,
choose to not host.
Although many of
We have a couple of system accounts that we send email to that no one has access to
send back to via delivery restricts. Well someone actually sent back and it go
through. Any idea's why?
Thank you,
Alex Gonzalez
Senior Systems Administrator
Handleman Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(248)
Simple. Its not cost effective to outsourse at the levels they target. They
missed the boat from day one.
There is a relative break even point for having your own IT staff,
generally in the 25-75 user range, depending on what your company actually
does. More than 100 or so, and you really need
Or use GETMAC from the NTRESKIT like this:
for /f tokens=1 skip=3 %%i in ('net view /domain:yourdomain') do getmac
%%i c:\macaddress.txt
-Original Message-
From: Joe Pochedley [mailto:JoePochedley;namfg.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Yes, I do rule and yes, the Cowboys do suck.
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:33 AM
Subject: RE: Postmaster reply address
The SMTP address exists as the from address for outbound
You hit the nail on the head on this answer. I would like to add one more word
to it. Control
If it is in-house you have (at least perceptional) better or more control
over what is happening with what has become a critical business application.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Roger
I really should have let someone else do this. Jeesh.. OS/SP/EX yada,
yada, yada.
Gèoff...
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Emails to clients that are
So Roger, does this mean that you are getting ready for the sobering
messages?
First, let me say that I am not privy to any advanced product planning in
what I am about to say, and am only speculating. I fully expect to see a
pure hardware version of an entry level Exchange Server within ten
Bandwidth, oh bandwidth where art thou...
Sliding to the heavens on a VSAT beam.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:sander;korbi.net]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:27 AM
To:
We are hitting a stumbling block in our plans to retire our old MSX 5.5
servers. Due to various reasons, we need to use OWA 5.5 to access E2K
mailboxes for the next 6 months or so. Normally, we don't see any issues
(well, very few) using OWA 5.5 (SP4) to access E2K mailboxes. However, if
the OWA
Guys,
I have done NT/E5.5 recovery. (the well known part1/part2 technet doc)
However, I have never done W2K/E5.5 recovery.
Currently need to do full server restore to recover deleted mail.
Could someone give me the link to the technet articles, if any...can't
find them..., on this topic. (need
To what server is OWA's directory pointing in the registry?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
We are hitting a stumbling block in our plans to retire our old MSX 5.5
servers. Due
I don't think the underlying OS changes the restore procedure as far as
Exchange is concerned.
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:llee;binaryinc.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Guys,
I have done NT/E5.5 recovery. (the well known
That would be cool. They could call it Qube or something. I hope it
gets to market before Sun thinks of it.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler;boeing.com]
Posted At: Friday, November 08, 2002 01:30 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation:
I don't disagree with that. That is, in fact, a bit of the tact that the
OpenExchange product of another thread follows - you drop the CD in a new
box and off it goes - OS, app, etc, all as a single install.
I fully expect the evolution of small business boxes to probably accelerate.
Things like
I anticipate the same thing, in less time.
I also expect it to be later than comparable products.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Exchange
Thanks Chris,
The information I have found supports your comment. I am glad to hear it
verified.
So, I imagine it goes something like this:
1. Bring up a W2K DC. Sync.
2. Bring offline. This will act as W2K AD (call this w2kdc).
3. Bring up another Server (call this w2kmail).
4. Restore
The first MSX5.5 server in site.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA 5.5 E2K mailboxes
To what server is OWA's directory pointing in the registry?
-Original
I like to know how other are doing their exchange server backup for the user
mailbox. We are running exchange5.5 and Arcserve with exchange agent.
Arcserve is running on a separate server then the Exchange server. We have
been getting a lots of unsuccessful backup for the mailboxes. Should we run
Just run regular backups. Brick-level = bad.
Or, upgrade to Ex2k, and use the restore deleted mailbox function.
Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit
-Original Message-
From: Tony Nguyen
Well everyone hates the other guy's backup :) We finally gave up on
ArcServe, it worked so poorly and they have horrible support. We used
Veritas competitive upgrade to replace and have been happy ever since. It's
a good product, I'm not aware of anyone dumping Veritas to go to Arcserve.
Make a
Is it successfully backing up the information store?
Logs purging after the backups?
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I am having a heck of a time configuring AutoDL to work. I can't seem
to locate much help besides the install.txt with the Resource Kit. I
have followed the instrcutions to the best of my ability and when I
login to the AutoDL main page I get an error DOMAIN\UserName is not
recognized by the
This is only for the mailboxes. The information store is successful.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: exchange backup
Is it successfully backing up the information
Excellent then. That's all I would do. :o)
I pretty much follow this:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm
Exmerge important mailboxes to .pst if you must every now and then.
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On
I don't have my disaster recovery notes in front of me. But if we're just
going after the mailboxes shouldn't you just be able to bring up a new
server (with the same name as the old Exchange server) on a new network, run
dcpromo and then install Exchange with the same site and org names. Stop the
If you change that to a GC does it help/hurt?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
The first MSX5.5 server in site.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff
Define your DL management requirements.
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Mailing List
[mailto:MSExchangeMailingList;seniortech.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I am having a heck of a time configuring AutoDL to work. I can't seem
to
Requirements: Web-Based, Easy to Use
From what I see in AutoDL, this has the funtionality I need. (if it
worked)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Posted At: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:33 PM
Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List
Conversation:
If we are going after mailboxes only, why not just install 5.5 to a member
server on the existing network, create a new site and org with the same
names as the existing Exch Server, restore an online backup of the info
store only to that server, run the Consistency Adjuster, assign an user
account
I didn't think it was a virus. I thought it was only social
engineering
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Couch, Nate
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus heads up
Just to
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
