RE: Using Connector for Lotus Notes for Co-Existence.
I can think of at least 4 Notes Connector installs for customers that I've done over the years, some of which have now been operational for well over 3 years. One company had multiple divisions all running their own mail system; they simply wanted a shared address book, hence the connector install. Supported users range from 200-500 Notes users, with the biggest synchronised GAL being around 6,000. Overall, I'm happy with the connector as a long-term coexistence tool. If there have been any serious problems, then none of the site contacts has informed me of them! Neil -Original Message- From: TWaweru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 07 September 2001 20:51 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Using Connector for Lotus Notes for Co-Existence. Subject: Using Connector for Lotus Notes for Co-Existence. Hi all, Is anyone using the Microsoft Exchange Connector for Lotus Notes for co-existence(as opposed to a migration tool) between the two mail systems? [XSRV 5.5 Notes 5.x] If so, kindly answer any or all of the following questions that am having difficulty getting answers for: - How long have you used it? What were your main reasons for electing to co-exist? How many users are you supporting on it? What kind of daily message volume? What has your general experience with the product been? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This eMail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this eMail in error please contact the Support Desk Immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or on eMail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup?
Hey, does this mean we will get a upgrade to our Compaq servers (a sticky badge with Compaq/HP to over sticker the current badge ;-), well this happened over here when ITV (television company) took over ON digital (digital arial transmitter company). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 September 2001 05:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? It's a pity Capellas didn't consult you prior to making his mind up. By the way, Mr. Savvy Business Expert, HP no longer makes medical and analytical measurement business. The company that has all that is now known as Agilent, having been spun off some time ago. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Ahh cmon Ed, it was a joke...besides...on a personal note...I think Compaq got nailed in this deal. If Michael Capellas (sp?) was the initiator then he should be shot. I read an article a while back that said he had a master plan underway to turn Compaq into a services giant? They already were. So he sold out to HP and that crummy I can't make a decent print driver for terminal services because it MS's fault) company is probably laughing. On top of it HP has always had bad relations with MS compared to Compaq. The whole board gets replaced with HP drivel. The only reason HP get valued higher is because of their medical and analytical measurement business. If you did a one to one comparison Compaq is the better company with better product. Now Carly Fiorina gets to save face when she lays off another 2 HP diehard workers (who already took no paid vacation) and can blame it on the restructuring and meshing process -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 5, 2001 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Just what I would have expected from you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? How about Whorepaq? We give you anything you want even if it doesn't work as advertised? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: September 5, 2001 4:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? How about Hewlett Compaqard? And all those Compaq people may have to put up with having an underscore in their SMTP address. Yuk. Neil -Original Message- From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 05 September 2001 09:48 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Crazy. Try telling your IT Director no such product exists. Cna't see anyone thinking of writing such a product anyway. Then you are into backing up growing PSTs on multiple remote machines where users may not log out causing open file problems, and users invariably cannot manage tape rotation. It's very rapidly going to go pear shaped as the PSTs corrupt too. Support nightmare. Suggest IT Director talks to consultant at Compaq (or is that HP), Hompaq, HPaq.com, there must be a good name comes out of the *merger* !! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2001 09:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? OK, so perhaps I should add a little more information here. Believe me, I KNOW .pst files are bad. And, in light of what follows, I have already started looking for another job. We are currently merging two companies. My IT director wants ALL remote Exchange servers removed from ALL offices across Europe and for ALL users to connect Outlook directly to central servers in the UK over VPN. Some of this work has been done and naturally, users are complaining about speed issues and performance. Especially those on a 256K link! :) So, rather than backing down, he wants ALL remote users to have RPC connectivity to the central servers and use .pst files for their mail. (ouch!) But...he doesn't want the whole .pst file backing up every time because...some users have 1Gb .pst files!!! Now you understand why I am looking for another job. My arms are not nearly long enough to keep this at
RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
Thanks a lot for the replies. Anyway, I decided to remove the server from behind the Proxy, and give it a public IP address. This way, I will not have to worry about this issue anymore. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Well, even if you succeed I'd suspect you'll run into more problems if you use MTA in SP3 and everything else on SP4. Why not call PSS? -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 The issue is that I do need sp4 somehow, as I am using Trend Micro ScanMail for Exchange v3.51, which seems to need a new version of store.exe (provided with sp4). Is it safe to keep sp4, yet restore only files related to the MTA from sp3 and below, since the problem is specific to the MTA only. And in this case, what are the files that I can replace without affecting Exchange functionality? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 SP4 modified the schema of the databases. You did make a backup before upgrading to SP4, right? - Original Message - From: Nizar El-Assaad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:04 PM Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thank you Serdar for the reply, and yes both sides are at sp4. Regarding reverting back to sp3, does it actually work to restore on sp3 whereas the latest backup was made after the upgrade to sp4? According to MS PSS, you should install the same service packs before restoring. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Did you upgrade both sides to SP4? Did you make any other changes after the SP4 upgrade? As far as falling back to SP3, I'm afraid you'll have to restore from backup. Exchange won't allow you to reinstall SP3 on top of SP4 or uninstall SP4. S/ -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Already did. I even tried to change it and assign a new port on both sides. There is no use. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 I'm assuming that the MTA static port assignment was done through a registry change. Verify that it's still there. SP4 may have overwritten it. S -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Hello all I have two Exchange 5.5 sites with one server in each site (Windows NT Server 4.0/sp6a, Exchange 5.5/sp3 on both servers). I am using Exchange behind Proxy 2.0 in one site, and in order to make inter-site communication possible, I had to assign a fixed TCP port for the MTA (I am using port 6000). It was working fine, until I upgraded from sp3 to sp4. Since then, messages are stuck in the MTA queue, and I get error messages every 10 minutes that say: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 4, NT/MTA error code: 1753. Comms error 1753, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name TOM [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) I had this same problem in the first place (with Exchange sp3) before I assigned a static TCP port for the MTA (because of MS Proxy), and the solution was to assign this static port. Is there a way to fix this problem? And if not, can I revert back to sp3? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Exchange 5.5 sp4
in my case 1. 30 mins is the average. Sp4 is fastest to install (fr my experience). 2. apply first on a test lab/server. then restore to previous state. simulate update and restore. 3. remember: backup before applying on prodn. 4. in case..., restore as mentioned by ms's whitepaper. I've always restored fr online backup... [a] [a] if not sure, do not restore right away, ask the list... tell them what is wrong, what is in the logs, etc... you might not need a restore :-) -Original Message- From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 sp4 I saw in a recent thread that exchange 5.5 service pack 4 updates the databases and cannot be removed. Can anyone advise how long this is likely to take (yes I know trhis a stupid question, but compared to other SPs, usually I'd get the service back within about half an hour say) Hours? Most of a day? restoring if anything goes wrong - if the server is upgraded to SP4, then the database conversion screws up , could I restore the online backup? Or would I have to rebuild the server? any advice welcome, thanks, Harriet _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Recommendations for .pst file backup?
Who knows. It is a possibility though, and they said that the specific product lines / branding hasn't been decided on. My view is that the Compaq Proliant servers will become a sub-brand of the HP brand (IF the merger happens), ie HP Compaq Proliant. As for the other product lines like Alpha, Himalaya, Storageworks etc I couldn't say. I think there is less synergy (geez I HATE that word) than is being touted, and consolidation of the product lines is a way off, with some very tough decisions ahead. The main product line that wont be affected during this is the HP Printing and Imaging, ie scanners and printers, since Compaq hasn't played in that space for a while. Dropping the Compaq name altogether is a move, that if done, would need to be handled quite delicately, so as not to alienate the existing Compaq customer base. Glenn (A damn proud Compaq employee) - Original Message - From: Hurst, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 6:54 PM Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Hey, does this mean we will get a upgrade to our Compaq servers (a sticky badge with Compaq/HP to over sticker the current badge ;-), well this happened over here when ITV (television company) took over ON digital (digital arial transmitter company). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 September 2001 05:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? It's a pity Capellas didn't consult you prior to making his mind up. By the way, Mr. Savvy Business Expert, HP no longer makes medical and analytical measurement business. The company that has all that is now known as Agilent, having been spun off some time ago. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Ahh cmon Ed, it was a joke...besides...on a personal note...I think Compaq got nailed in this deal. If Michael Capellas (sp?) was the initiator then he should be shot. I read an article a while back that said he had a master plan underway to turn Compaq into a services giant? They already were. So he sold out to HP and that crummy I can't make a decent print driver for terminal services because it MS's fault) company is probably laughing. On top of it HP has always had bad relations with MS compared to Compaq. The whole board gets replaced with HP drivel. The only reason HP get valued higher is because of their medical and analytical measurement business. If you did a one to one comparison Compaq is the better company with better product. Now Carly Fiorina gets to save face when she lays off another 2 HP diehard workers (who already took no paid vacation) and can blame it on the restructuring and meshing process -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 5, 2001 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Just what I would have expected from you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? How about Whorepaq? We give you anything you want even if it doesn't work as advertised? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: September 5, 2001 4:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? How about Hewlett Compaqard? And all those Compaq people may have to put up with having an underscore in their SMTP address. Yuk. Neil -Original Message- From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 05 September 2001 09:48 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Crazy. Try telling your IT Director no such product exists. Cna't see anyone thinking of writing such a product anyway. Then you are into backing up growing PSTs on multiple remote machines where users may not log out causing open file problems, and users invariably cannot manage tape rotation. It's very rapidly going to go pear shaped as the PSTs corrupt too. Support nightmare. Suggest IT Director talks to consultant at Compaq (or is that
RE: XCH 2000 OWA
No, you can't -Original Message- From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: XCH 2000 OWA Does anyone know if I can take a stand-alone IIS server and put XCH 2K OWA on it BUT connect to a XCH 5.5 backend? TIA . . . Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail
You can delete the relevant service from Outlook, and allow users to run only certain applications using Group Policy. -Original Message- From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Is there a way to prevent users from using (for example) AOL or any other 3rd party POP3 mail clients. We want to force our users to use only our exchange server for their e-mail. Can this be done? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: orphaned .ost files
You can use the ost2pst utility. If you need it email me privately. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: orphaned .ost files What utilitie or procedure can be used to extract mailbox data from an orphaned .ost file to a new mailbox? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 and Multiple Forests Question
In mixed mode you could try to use ADC and SRS to create contacts. A different workaround :setup LDAP service on the workstations to point to the other forest. -Original Message- From: Bloom, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 and Multiple Forests Question I've been asked to set up calendar/address list sharing between two Exchange 2000 organizations (two AD forests). I don't think this can be done but wanted to check with everybody to make sure. Is it possible? Tom Bloom Texas AM University _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q283/2/38.asp -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thank you Serdar for the reply, and yes both sides are at sp4. Regarding reverting back to sp3, does it actually work to restore on sp3 whereas the latest backup was made after the upgrade to sp4? According to MS PSS, you should install the same service packs before restoring. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Did you upgrade both sides to SP4? Did you make any other changes after the SP4 upgrade? As far as falling back to SP3, I'm afraid you'll have to restore from backup. Exchange won't allow you to reinstall SP3 on top of SP4 or uninstall SP4. S/ -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Already did. I even tried to change it and assign a new port on both sides. There is no use. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 I'm assuming that the MTA static port assignment was done through a registry change. Verify that it's still there. SP4 may have overwritten it. S -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4 Hello all I have two Exchange 5.5 sites with one server in each site (Windows NT Server 4.0/sp6a, Exchange 5.5/sp3 on both servers). I am using Exchange behind Proxy 2.0 in one site, and in order to make inter-site communication possible, I had to assign a fixed TCP port for the MTA (I am using port 6000). It was working fine, until I upgraded from sp3 to sp4. Since then, messages are stuck in the MTA queue, and I get error messages every 10 minutes that say: An RPC communications error occurred. Unable to bind over RPC. Locality Table (LTAB) index: 4, NT/MTA error code: 1753. Comms error 1753, Bind error 0, Remote Server Name TOM [MAIN BASE 1 500 %10] (14) I had this same problem in the first place (with Exchange sp3) before I assigned a static TCP port for the MTA (because of MS Proxy), and the solution was to assign this static port. Is there a way to fix this problem? And if not, can I revert back to sp3? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex 2000 new installation or migration in NT 4.0 DOmain
Thanks Kevin and Ed I will try to convince them to move the actual domain to AD. JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Backups?
What is the best way to make sure you can get data back? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex 2000 new installation or migration in NT 4.0 DOmain
Hi JF - I do a lot of work with Exchange for small companies and find that moving them onto W2K is generally a very simple operation as they usually are set up as a single domain and don't use DNS. Thus the general procedure is upgrade a DC to get AD, protect this with another DC, populate the directory with the ADC, add E2K on a stand alone server, move users onto it. You have to bite the bullet and move to a mixed mode environment otherwise you are creating an administrative nightmare by maintaining two directories which refer to the same user objects. If the company wishes to keep all other servers running NT4 then that's not a problem. Just live in mixed mode until they all move across. -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2001 05:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 2000 new installation or migration in NT 4.0 DOmain Because the customer want Ex2k and ex2k need AD Because the customer do not want to move the atual domain to AD I really appreciate the time and answers i'M getting from this list. But like the MS Exam, the level of your answers here seem for BIG ENTERPRISE HAVING A LOT OF $$ those answers sometimes do not aply to real life, or little companies. SO even if it's not the best way to go, I was wondering and it could work. Thanks again, I'm serious. I'M learning a lot from this list. JF -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: 9 septembre, 2001 23:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 2000 new installation or migration in NT 4.0 DOmain In a word WHY? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality: This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the addressee only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please advise the sender by replying to this e-mail immediately and then delete the original from your computer. Opinion: Any opinions expressed in this e-mail are entirely those of the author and, unless specifically stated to the contrary, are not necessarily those of Direct Select (192) Limited. Security Warning: Internet e-mail is not necessarily a secure communications medium and we advise that you understand and consider this fact when e-mailing us. Direct Select (192) Limited does not accept responsibility for any changes made to this message after it was sent. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments are free from all known viruses we advise that, in keeping with good computing practice, the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Backups?
Before everyone else jumps on this. It's best to read the FAQ found at the bottom of this message and search the archives for BACKUP as a topic. This message thread especially is asked at least twice a week, and trust me, I haven't seen ANY change in the answers in the two years I've followed this list. Bob -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Backups? What is the best way to make sure you can get data back? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arcserve and Exchange
Is Arcserve and exchange a good choice? Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Backups?
Umattempt a restore on an offline server? -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Backups? What is the best way to make sure you can get data back? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Arcserve and Exchange
Exchange is a good choice, Arcserve is a good choice if you don't care about your backups, or should I say your restores??? Honestly Arcserve sucks. PS.Adriaan have you visited the FAQ's yet? The link is at the bottom of this email... Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Arcserve and Exchange Is Arcserve and exchange a good choice? Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Backups?
Thanks -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 10:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Backups? Before everyone else jumps on this. It's best to read the FAQ found at the bottom of this message and search the archives for BACKUP as a topic. This message thread especially is asked at least twice a week, and trust me, I haven't seen ANY change in the answers in the two years I've followed this list. Bob -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Backups? What is the best way to make sure you can get data back? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet access to Exchange Server
Has any one used this? Is it any good? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need advice adding a new server...
We have another office that we want to get up on exchange 5.5. We have a single domain and a working Exchange 5.5 server locally here running on a PDC with OWA installed. The office connects to the network via an ISDN line that (recently at least) seems prone to downtime. We have already installed an exchange server at the office. We installed it on a BDC and made it a new server in our Existing Site. However I am beginning to think we may have gone about this wrong. A couple of reasons: 1. They need a different email address, but since it is in the same site the default site addressing can't be changed, without changing the site addressing for us, forcing the admin to manual change each mail box. 2. The MS knowledge base says that the ISDN connection speed is just barely adequate for two servers in the same site. My question is if we remove this server and create them as a different site will OWA still work for the new mailboxes over at the office? It does right now but I don't know how a site connector would affect things. We do NOT want to install IIS on there server unless we absolutely have to. We would like them to go to our main web page and get access to there mailboxes from there. Also Is there a way that if we keep the new server in the same site as our existing main server that we can set up a different default SMTP address for each server? For example are email is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the new office needs email address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you need me to clarify anything let me know. Thanks in advance -Rick Rick Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://grove.ufl.edu/~rickb Network Administrator: UF Dept. of Ob/Gyn _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need advice adding a new server...
What about using ADSL? -Original Message- From: Bean, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 10:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need advice adding a new server... We have another office that we want to get up on exchange 5.5. We have a single domain and a working Exchange 5.5 server locally here running on a PDC with OWA installed. The office connects to the network via an ISDN line that (recently at least) seems prone to downtime. We have already installed an exchange server at the office. We installed it on a BDC and made it a new server in our Existing Site. However I am beginning to think we may have gone about this wrong. A couple of reasons: 1. They need a different email address, but since it is in the same site the default site addressing can't be changed, without changing the site addressing for us, forcing the admin to manual change each mail box. 2. The MS knowledge base says that the ISDN connection speed is just barely adequate for two servers in the same site. My question is if we remove this server and create them as a different site will OWA still work for the new mailboxes over at the office? It does right now but I don't know how a site connector would affect things. We do NOT want to install IIS on there server unless we absolutely have to. We would like them to go to our main web page and get access to there mailboxes from there. Also Is there a way that if we keep the new server in the same site as our existing main server that we can set up a different default SMTP address for each server? For example are email is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the new office needs email address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you need me to clarify anything let me know. Thanks in advance -Rick Rick Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://grove.ufl.edu/~rickb Network Administrator: UF Dept. of Ob/Gyn _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need advice adding a new server...
Without speaking about your specific situation, yes OWA will work fine even if one server is in a different site, you shouldn't need another IIS/OWA server. Also, I'd investigate using an X400 connector instead of a site connector. Phil My question is if we remove this server and create them as a different site will OWA still work for the new mailboxes over at the office? It does right now but I don't know how a site connector would affect things. We do NOT want to install IIS on there server unless we absolutely have to. We would like them to go to our main web page and get access to there mailboxes from there. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet access to Exchange Server
Do you mean OWA? If you do, yes, we use this, yes it's very good. Bob -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet access to Exchange Server Has any one used this? Is it any good? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet access to Exchange Server
The correct answer would have being Yes!, (and) Yes!! Kuminda Chandimith Sr. Technical Consultant Ducont.com FZ-LLC Tel: + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237 Fax: +971-4-3913001 http://www.ducont.com -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2001 16:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet access to Exchange Server Do you mean OWA? If you do, yes, we use this, yes it's very good. Bob -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internet access to Exchange Server Has any one used this? Is it any good? Thanks Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Arcserve and Exchange
Arcserve and anything is not a good choice. Not true, Arcserve and a dumpster are a perfect fit... Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Arcserve and Exchange On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Van Huissteden, Adriaan wrote: Is Arcserve and exchange a good choice? Arcserve and anything is not a good choice. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar of user causes hanging
Try Q182112. Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: Vuyk, Wim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar of user causes hanging Hi everyone, I have one user in my organisation who has a problem on his calendar. When he, or any other user approaches his calendar through Outlook, Outlook will stop responding. Either directly through the authorised account, or indirectly through opening the calendar via opening the calendar via File, open, folder of another user. We expect this to be a problem of the server, because it happens to anyone approaching his calendar. We used EXMERGE to move the user to a test environment and tested if the problem would occur again in the test environment. Same problem again. We tried ISINTEG, but no troubling information came out of this run. We subsequently solved all the warnings (5) ISINTEG generated. The messages generated concerned mainly inconsistancies in counts. Problem with the calendar was still the same. We did run ESEUTIL, without any problems, and no result for this problem Ofcourse the user involved is a manager with a busy, busy busy schedule. I am running out of options here, who has a good suggestion for me to continue on? Our configuration: Exchange 5.5 SP 5.5 Outlook 98 8.5.5603.0 Windows 95/ 98 /2000 environment Any help will be appreciated!!! Wim Vuyk Wegener NV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using Connector for Lotus Notes for Co-Existence.
1.Since 7/2001 on this site, since 10/2000 at our European hub site. 2.We merged with a company that has 130+ notes sites, we have about the same amount of Exchange sites neither side could justify the cost to migrate, yet... 3.None, it's just a connector of sorts. Just connects the NJ Exchange Hub site with the OH Notes Hub site. 4.Lots...It chugs along all day...hell it doesn't have to do a damn thing, the Exchange box does all the conversions 5.Notes sucks. Notes client sucks more. I'd rather go back to MS Mail then migrate to Notes. With an adequately sized Notes server you should only have to reboot it every couple of months. Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 If so, kindly answer any or all of the following questions that am having difficulty getting answers for: - How long have you used it? What were your main reasons for electing to co-exist? How many users are you supporting on it? What kind of daily message volume? What has your general experience with the product been? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Server Rearchitecture
How many people at this remote site, and how heavy do you expect the traffic to be. I have three remote sites connected with point-to-point T-1's. They each have an Exchange box hosting about 150 mailboxes, 25% to 30% of which see moderate to heavy use. No separate Exchange site, no x-400 connector, and no IMS at those locations, with no observable ill effects. YMMV. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Server Rearchitecture Hi all: I have a few questions as I head out to install an Exchange 5.5 box in our remote office. First here is what we have going on: - HQ has 3 5.5 servers with IMS's pointed to a sendmail mail-hub - These three servers are all in the same site and org. I am going to be placing another Exchange server in a remote office on our WAN which is connected via a point-to-point t-1. With this connection and subsequent new Exchange server should I: 1.) Look at making another site, connecting via an x400 or 2.) Just setting it up with another IMS but I don't think that is the best thing. Also, if I do this connector and join up the two sites should I not do a connector through the three machines that are in the different site and have one IMS that routes to the sendmail host? Or should I just sit with three IMS's? I have not done an x400 connector before so I am leary about how to and what my concerns should be. Thank you, Erik L. Vesneski Internal Network Manager Epicentric, Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global signature
Kool-Aid anyone? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Karen Swart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Global signature Does anyone know how (if possible) to add a global signature to appear automatically at the bottom of e-mail messages sent from Exchange 5.5? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global signature
Karen, Without trying to sound too rude, did you just join the list today? Did you do any research into this question at all before posting it? This has been asked (and answered) at least three times in the last week. There is a link to the FAQ at the bottom of this (and every) message: please follow it to get your answer. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Karen Swart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Global signature Does anyone know how (if possible) to add a global signature to appear automatically at the bottom of e-mail messages sent from Exchange 5.5? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail
does it still re-write the boot record of the hard disk? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience. - -Original Message- From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Norton ANtivirus Corporate Edition Prevents the users from disabling it, they can't even turn off the service. If they to change my forced settings or disabling the antivirus service they are prompted for an administrative password. MUHAHAHHAHAHANAV has worked flawlessly from day one and I have never had to hardly touch it. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail How do you enforce scanning the desktops (I assume you mean something is loading like CA InoculateIt)? What's to keep Joe User from disabling it? - Original Message - From: Monahon, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:14 PM Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail We scan incoming and outgoing and the IMCs. We scan the desktops, servers, and the mail store. We'll catch it one way or the other. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Well, pop mail doesn't come in anywhere except the client. The client sends using SMTP and does this via relaying. So you're saying you can scan mail that is being bounced off the external IMS interface? - Original Message - From: Monahon, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:36 PM Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Okay, different management style here. We are scanning all our pop mail coming into the organization for viruses and spam content so it's not really a concern. We prefer to foster a healthy working relationship with our customers. We are winning our POP battle through attrition and the method I described below. IT is also gaining the respect of our users, something that was missing before the new regime was installed and changed the process. It depends what important to you, and maybe how big ones ego is. Cheers. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail I disagree. When your users are using external POP3 mail that's not under your control, it voids all of your virus/content filtering/etc. etc. protection you've employed. He's exactly right on what he wants to do. S. -Original Message- From: Monahon, Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail You may be going about it wrong. Instead of forcing users off POP and pissing off the user base, aggressively promote the advantages of Exchange combined with the Outlook for scheduling, calendaring, list services, OWA, backups etc. As the company and managers begin to realize the benefits of these value added solutions, you may begin to see some changes. When the POP users dwindle down to a cranky few, then you pull out the baseball bat. Revolutions usually begin quietly. Greg -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail And if you block POP3 in your firewall, it means your employees or administration can't pick up their email at home. Bob -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail But that is only about 25% of the battle, you also need to stop port 80 email as well, and there are only about a million of those. Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday,
RE: Calendar of user causes hanging
It's the corrupt meeting that's causing the problem. All you have to do is use OWA to access this person's calendar and delete the corrupt calendar item. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vuyk, Wim Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar of user causes hanging Hi everyone, I have one user in my organisation who has a problem on his calendar. When he, or any other user approaches his calendar through Outlook, Outlook will stop responding. Either directly through the authorised account, or indirectly through opening the calendar via opening the calendar via File, open, folder of another user. We expect this to be a problem of the server, because it happens to anyone approaching his calendar. We used EXMERGE to move the user to a test environment and tested if the problem would occur again in the test environment. Same problem again. We tried ISINTEG, but no troubling information came out of this run. We subsequently solved all the warnings (5) ISINTEG generated. The messages generated concerned mainly inconsistancies in counts. Problem with the calendar was still the same. We did run ESEUTIL, without any problems, and no result for this problem Ofcourse the user involved is a manager with a busy, busy busy schedule. I am running out of options here, who has a good suggestion for me to continue on? Our configuration: Exchange 5.5 SP 5.5 Outlook 98 8.5.5603.0 Windows 95/ 98 /2000 environment Any help will be appreciated!!! Wim Vuyk Wegener NV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Calendar of user causes hanging
its most likely a recurring meeting... and q281935 points to a hotfix that you should install (post SP4) to prevent it from happening again... this is the CDO 1.21 update Greg -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Calendar of user causes hanging It's the corrupt meeting that's causing the problem. All you have to do is use OWA to access this person's calendar and delete the corrupt calendar item. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vuyk, Wim Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Calendar of user causes hanging Hi everyone, I have one user in my organisation who has a problem on his calendar. When he, or any other user approaches his calendar through Outlook, Outlook will stop responding. Either directly through the authorised account, or indirectly through opening the calendar via opening the calendar via File, open, folder of another user. We expect this to be a problem of the server, because it happens to anyone approaching his calendar. We used EXMERGE to move the user to a test environment and tested if the problem would occur again in the test environment. Same problem again. We tried ISINTEG, but no troubling information came out of this run. We subsequently solved all the warnings (5) ISINTEG generated. The messages generated concerned mainly inconsistancies in counts. Problem with the calendar was still the same. We did run ESEUTIL, without any problems, and no result for this problem Ofcourse the user involved is a manager with a busy, busy busy schedule. I am running out of options here, who has a good suggestion for me to continue on? Our configuration: Exchange 5.5 SP 5.5 Outlook 98 8.5.5603.0 Windows 95/ 98 /2000 environment Any help will be appreciated!!! Wim Vuyk Wegener NV _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: office assistant
Hi When i enable out of office assistant. only for users with in that organisation are getting out of office reply , those mails which are sent from other domains are not getting the out of office reply. please help me in solving this issue thanks in advance A.U.Sankar _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Arcserve and Exchange
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Van Huissteden, Adriaan wrote: Is Arcserve and exchange a good choice? Arcserve and anything is not a good choice. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Another Outlook Web Access problem - Please help?
Hi there, Thanks for replying. I did not get to read the article you send yet. Thanks. The actual problem was with NT Authentication. The user was not in the group allowed to access it. He is part of a separate company. We only host their servers and let them use our Exchange Server. Thank you, Ghaleed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 September 2001 02:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another Outlook Web Access problem - Please help? have you read thru this? http://support.microsoft.com/support/exchange/content/whitepapers/owa_tshoo t.asp -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - And the donkeys frolicked with the waffles, joyously. - -Original Message- From: Ghaleed Nortje [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Another Outlook Web Access problem - Please help? Hi there, We are running Exchange Server 5.5 at our site. I have problems with users not being able to log on to their mailboxes using Outlook Web Access (trough Internet Browser). It has been setup for them to enter their domain logon details first to get to the Outlook Web Access logon Page. Some users cannot get access to the Outlook Logon Page (Internet Explorer). Yes, we have checked their domain logon details. We have even setup new user accounts to try and log on, but still we cannot. If I type in another user logon details it then works fine. I did check to see if they are setup to log on locally on the Exchange Server and they are. Can anybody please tell me what could be wrong or how to enable Web Access for the users. Thank you, Ghaleed . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5 .5)
Lawyers are never cheap, or easy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one. - Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5 .5) Fast, cheap, easy Pick two - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:03 PM Subject: RE: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5 .5) Since they're only lawyers, they probably don't have a lot of money to spend. =) On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:47:13 -0400 , Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So they want it free, and the want it quick. Let me guess. It has to be really really GOOD, too? I would search the net for a freeware PGP prgrams. Something might fit. -Jim -Original Message- From: James Barry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Secure Email over the Internet between to Exchange Servers (5.5) They don't want to spend the money and they don't need full access to all resources. I am getting some sporadic info that it can be done with the Internet Mail Service but IIS has to be installed and a Key has to be generated for each server. I am looking for some concrete info on how it can be done or if it can. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SOT: Looking for an Exchange Speaker
Hello All, We, the core group of Rubi-con, are looking for a speaker to talk about Exchange Administration and Security, as well as a few other topics. The conference is April 5th-7th, 2002 in Detroit, Michigan. If you are interested in speaking (or have questions), please e-mail me privately (OFF LIST) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and don't reply here, as this probably won't interest the others here. Thanks for the bandwidth... Denis Denis A. Baldwin (A+/MCP/I-Net+/Net+/CCA/CIW) Network Administrator, CAE, Inc. 810-231-9373, ext. 229 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: office assistant
Why do you want to send OOF messages to people in other domains? It's annoying. Ed has a couple of things to say about it from a security standpoint, too. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - If you must choose between two evils, pick the one you've never tried before. - -Original Message- From: Uthaya Sankar A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw: office assistant Hi When i enable out of office assistant. only for users with in that organisation are getting out of office reply , those mails which are sent from other domains are not getting the out of office reply. please help me in solving this issue thanks in advance A.U.Sankar _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: office assistant
my problem is say if you are sending mail to me, you won't get auto reply from my mail box, but who ever sending mails to me with in my office will get reply i think u will be able to help me now. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:44 PM Subject: RE: office assistant Why do you want to send OOF messages to people in other domains? It's annoying. Ed has a couple of things to say about it from a security standpoint, too. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - If you must choose between two evils, pick the one you've never tried before. - -Original Message- From: Uthaya Sankar A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw: office assistant Hi When i enable out of office assistant. only for users with in that organisation are getting out of office reply , those mails which are sent from other domains are not getting the out of office reply. please help me in solving this issue thanks in advance A.U.Sankar _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: office assistant
Oh, I understood what you were saying. I want to know WHY you want to do it? Read Mike's post. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may make you think you have mystical Kung Fu powers, resulting in you getting your ass kicked. - -Original Message- From: Uthaya Sankar A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: office assistant my problem is say if you are sending mail to me, you won't get auto reply from my mail box, but who ever sending mails to me with in my office will get reply i think u will be able to help me now. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:44 PM Subject: RE: office assistant Why do you want to send OOF messages to people in other domains? It's annoying. Ed has a couple of things to say about it from a security standpoint, too. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - If you must choose between two evils, pick the one you've never tried before. - -Original Message- From: Uthaya Sankar A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw: office assistant Hi When i enable out of office assistant. only for users with in that organisation are getting out of office reply , those mails which are sent from other domains are not getting the out of office reply. please help me in solving this issue thanks in advance A.U.Sankar _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-mail from a form
Yes but I would need to have a share on the Exchange server, accessible to the IIS server... There is no free lunch it seem!!! :o) Seem that using a local smtp server on the IIS server will be the way to go. -Message d'origine- De: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Date: 7 septembre, 2001 22:00 À: Exchange Discussions Objet: RE: E-mail from a form The easiest way to send SMTP mail with an Exchange server is to format an RFC822 message and drop it into the virtual server's Pickup directory. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bourque Daniel Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 6:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail from a form I remember reading some time ago that it was possible from a form in IIS to send an e-mail to a nearby Exchange/SMTP server, without having the SMTP service on the IIS server (and without the OWA setup). Any idea how to do it? ASP page? I had keep the messages but the expiration date on the public folder where it was located kick in a long time ago... Thank you Daniel Bourque _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail
I'm assuming that you might have gathered that I was being a complete smart a$$ in my reply. ;o) I agree with your sentiments exactly. D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail I'm running InoculateIT here and at work. It doesn't take much to figure out that right-clicking an object generally brings up a menu. Right-clicking InoculateIT does so and at the bottom it says Exit. Users aren't necessarily stupid ignoramuses; they usually know enough to get around and enough to get themselves in trouble yet not enough to get themselves out of trouble. - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:43 PM Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail What?!?!?! A user might actually be smart enough to do that? ;o) Golly gee... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail How do you enforce scanning the desktops (I assume you mean something is loading like CA InoculateIt)? What's to keep Joe User from disabling it? - Original Message - From: Monahon, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:14 PM Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail We scan incoming and outgoing and the IMCs. We scan the desktops, servers, and the mail store. We'll catch it one way or the other. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Well, pop mail doesn't come in anywhere except the client. The client sends using SMTP and does this via relaying. So you're saying you can scan mail that is being bounced off the external IMS interface? - Original Message - From: Monahon, Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:36 PM Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail Okay, different management style here. We are scanning all our pop mail coming into the organization for viruses and spam content so it's not really a concern. We prefer to foster a healthy working relationship with our customers. We are winning our POP battle through attrition and the method I described below. IT is also gaining the respect of our users, something that was missing before the new regime was installed and changed the process. It depends what important to you, and maybe how big ones ego is. Cheers. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail I disagree. When your users are using external POP3 mail that's not under your control, it voids all of your virus/content filtering/etc. etc. protection you've employed. He's exactly right on what he wants to do. S. -Original Message- From: Monahon, Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail You may be going about it wrong. Instead of forcing users off POP and pissing off the user base, aggressively promote the advantages of Exchange combined with the Outlook for scheduling, calendaring, list services, OWA, backups etc. As the company and managers begin to realize the benefits of these value added solutions, you may begin to see some changes. When the POP users dwindle down to a cranky few, then you pull out the baseball bat. Revolutions usually begin quietly. Greg -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail And if you block POP3 in your firewall, it means your employees or administration can't pick up their email at home. Bob -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forcing users to use only our exchange server for mail But that is only about 25% of the battle,
RE: Tricky restore problem on NT4 SP6a 5.5 Ent SP4
No, it was added after but I'm not sure that W002 was the first either. I just know that it was there before W001 and it is the oldest server in the site. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2001 18:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tricky restore problem on NT4 SP6a 5.5 Ent SP4 Was W001 the first server in the site? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Law #16: Any given program, when running, is obsolete. - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tricky restore problem on NT4 SP6a 5.5 Ent SP4 deep breath... I have a tricky problem that I need some advice on. I have two primary Exchange servers, w001 and w002, both in the same site. W002 has our IMS, public folders and most user mailboxes on it. W001 has about 20 mailboxes on it, no PF's and no IMS. A couple of days ago, W001 blue screened and died. Despite best efforts I have been unable to get it back up. The OS is on a RAID1 array, the log files are on a seperate RAID1 array and the stores on a RAID5 array. I have two problems here. One is the recovery of the data from the RAID 5 array. The other is this: If I reinstall the OS and Exchange, it won't let me connect the new server to the site with the server name W001. It wants me to delete the server W001 from the existing site first. Currently on W002 there is about 1000 items in the MTA waiting for the W001 server to come back on line. It is REALLY important that I don't lose this data. I suspect that if I delete W001 from the site, the stuff in the MTA on W002 will get binned also. So..any suggestions? Mark Hurst _ This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by Top Jobs on the Net for your protection and assurance using Star Internet services delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This inbound message has been checked for all known viruses by Top Jobs on The Net for your protection and assurance using Star Internet services delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp _ This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by Top Jobs on the Net for your protection and assurance using Star Internet services delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Exchange 55 to another nt4 domain
The article is still thereIt is referenced in the renaming a domain technet article. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 12:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Moving Exchange 55 to another nt4 domain It can be done. There used to be a Q article on this, but I don't know if it's still out there. Did you query TechNet? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bennett, Warren Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving Exchange 55 to another nt4 domain Hello - Having read some info about the pitfalls of moving an Exchange 5.5 server to another domain, and that it is not a good idea to do so. I would like to know if any of you have tried it and how did you do it. This particular server is a member of a site with a couple of other exchange servers. Thanks Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to use CDOEXM from VBSCRIPT on the client side
Hello all, this is my frist posting here, so I hope I am at the right place. I'm rather desparated! My colleques have programmed some very nice VBScripts to administrate an Exchange 2000 environment. The only drawback is these scripts run only at the server directly. From different informationen sources I got confirmed CDOEXM objects should also be useable from the client side but noone could describe the prerequisit to do so. Our milestones for delivering these scripts are comming closer and closer so please give me any information you have at hand. A very big Thank you in advance Michael PS: Excuse my poor english I am not a native speaker. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URGENT to Upgrade
Hi all, I have Exchange srver 5.5 Sp4 on WINDOWSNT 4.0 (Back office 4.5), NOW we are shifting the OS to Windows 2000 server and partitions will alsobe different. what are the best way to take the backup. *.edb and *.pat file i will take backup and what else I need to take care Thanks uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: messages lost in time
Any firewalls between the user's workstation and the Exchange server (specifically blocking UDP)? This can make it appear that mail is taking a long time to arrive, when the culprit is the PIX preventing Exchange from updating the client view. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:12:46 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an Exchange 2000 server SP1 running on win2k SP2. One user continually complains that they do not get internally generated messages for up to 24 hours after they have been sent. I have been through the usual how do you sort your messages with the end user as well as tracking the messages, and so far everything checks out. Has anyone else run into this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: third party client can't send email to external address!?
I added the IP where it says Hosts and Clients with these IP addresses I also have the Hosts and Clients that successfully authenticate enabled Did you add the IP as allowed or restricted? There is a whitepaper on MS' site on the IMS and relaying. - Original Message - From: Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:05 PM Subject: RE: third party client can't send email to external address!? We have an Exchange 5.5 and Microsoft Outlook as a client. We have a couple of users that uses Purchasing Net on their PC . This software has the ability to send out an email directly to our exchange server , then our email server should take care of the rest. It works internally ,but externally it doesn't . One suggested that to do Relaying which I did ,On the routing restritions page, which is located under the routing tab of the IMS properties page, I added the IP addresses of the client PC and server that has the third party software thats trying to send outside mail. . Stop and re-start Message Transfer Agent and Internet Mail Service. Tested it, now we are getting an error RELAYING is Prohibited on the log file on the client (Purchasing Net Server). I hope I provided enough info. Unfortunately I have to get this resolved without spending any companies money. to continue a thread please summarize the thought again or call p s s I know it sucks but hey WTH --steve I'm kind a desperate. Can somebody help me get this resolved. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT to Upgrade
this is outlined in the FAQ pretty well -Original Message- From: kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT to Upgrade Hi all, I have Exchange srver 5.5 Sp4 on WINDOWSNT 4.0 (Back office 4.5), NOW we are shifting the OS to Windows 2000 server and partitions will alsobe different. what are the best way to take the backup. *.edb and *.pat file i will take backup and what else I need to take care Thanks uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Public Folders
Exchange 5.5 SP4 Running OWA OWA works fine if I log in via the Log On form. If I use the Public Access hyperlink OWA opens an empty interface and pops up a dialog that says: Unable to render folder. There are no published folders. I have some public calendars but they must be published? Can someone help me? John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: URGENT to Upgrade
The easiest way would be to build a new server and follow FAQ Appendix A ,modifying it to meet the changes to Windows 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of kumar Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: URGENT to Upgrade Hi all, I have Exchange srver 5.5 Sp4 on WINDOWSNT 4.0 (Back office 4.5), NOW we are shifting the OS to Windows 2000 server and partitions will alsobe different. what are the best way to take the backup. *.edb and *.pat file i will take backup and what else I need to take care Thanks uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup?
My interpretation of the announcements and/or conjecture is that the server line would be HP ProLiant. But I am not speaking authoritatively here; I don't really know any more about this merger than you do. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Who knows. It is a possibility though, and they said that the specific product lines / branding hasn't been decided on. My view is that the Compaq Proliant servers will become a sub-brand of the HP brand (IF the merger happens), ie HP Compaq Proliant. As for the other product lines like Alpha, Himalaya, Storageworks etc I couldn't say. I think there is less synergy (geez I HATE that word) than is being touted, and consolidation of the product lines is a way off, with some very tough decisions ahead. The main product line that wont be affected during this is the HP Printing and Imaging, ie scanners and printers, since Compaq hasn't played in that space for a while. Dropping the Compaq name altogether is a move, that if done, would need to be handled quite delicately, so as not to alienate the existing Compaq customer base. Glenn (A damn proud Compaq employee) - Original Message - From: Hurst, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 6:54 PM Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Hey, does this mean we will get a upgrade to our Compaq servers (a sticky badge with Compaq/HP to over sticker the current badge ;-), well this happened over here when ITV (television company) took over ON digital (digital arial transmitter company). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 September 2001 05:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? It's a pity Capellas didn't consult you prior to making his mind up. By the way, Mr. Savvy Business Expert, HP no longer makes medical and analytical measurement business. The company that has all that is now known as Agilent, having been spun off some time ago. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Ahh cmon Ed, it was a joke...besides...on a personal note...I think Compaq got nailed in this deal. If Michael Capellas (sp?) was the initiator then he should be shot. I read an article a while back that said he had a master plan underway to turn Compaq into a services giant? They already were. So he sold out to HP and that crummy I can't make a decent print driver for terminal services because it MS's fault) company is probably laughing. On top of it HP has always had bad relations with MS compared to Compaq. The whole board gets replaced with HP drivel. The only reason HP get valued higher is because of their medical and analytical measurement business. If you did a one to one comparison Compaq is the better company with better product. Now Carly Fiorina gets to save face when she lays off another 2 HP diehard workers (who already took no paid vacation) and can blame it on the restructuring and meshing process -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: September 5, 2001 11:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? Just what I would have expected from you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? How about Whorepaq? We give you anything you want even if it doesn't work as advertised? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: September 5, 2001 4:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup? How about Hewlett Compaqard? And all those Compaq people may have to put up with having an underscore in their SMTP address. Yuk. Neil -Original Message- From: Ian Midgley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 05 September 2001 09:48 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
RE: How to use CDOEXM from VBSCRIPT on the client side
Probably all you need to do is install the Exchange 2000 Administration Tools on the Exchange 2000 Professional workstation or Exchange 2000 Server on which you want to run the scripts. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of mnk Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 3:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to use CDOEXM from VBSCRIPT on the client side Hello all, this is my frist posting here, so I hope I am at the right place. I'm rather desparated! My colleques have programmed some very nice VBScripts to administrate an Exchange 2000 environment. The only drawback is these scripts run only at the server directly. From different informationen sources I got confirmed CDOEXM objects should also be useable from the client side but noone could describe the prerequisit to do so. Our milestones for delivering these scripts are comming closer and closer so please give me any information you have at hand. A very big Thank you in advance Michael PS: Excuse my poor english I am not a native speaker. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to use CDOEXM from VBSCRIPT on the client side
Michael, First, your English is much better than my German, and better than that of 70% of the mouth breathers produced by the American educational system. As to your question, I'm not sure I have an answer directly, but I do have an implementation methodology question. Is there a reason that these scripts are to be run from the client side? Personally from an administrative and manageability perspective, I'd think I'd like to have the locations of these scripts centralized. In discussions with some of my peers I always worked from the base proposition that 3rd party management tools for Exchange are best designed to utilize a web based interface in which the scripts reside centrally and the ability for a user to execute a specific task is based on access permissions to the script or within a larger access control wrapper which encompasses the script options. Sorry for taking the discussion off topic, but I'm just interested in the design factors which led to one implementation methodology over another. Regards, Chris * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: mnk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 5:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to use CDOEXM from VBSCRIPT on the client side Hello all, this is my frist posting here, so I hope I am at the right place. I'm rather desparated! My colleques have programmed some very nice VBScripts to administrate an Exchange 2000 environment. The only drawback is these scripts run only at the server directly. From different informationen sources I got confirmed CDOEXM objects should also be useable from the client side but noone could describe the prerequisit to do so. Our milestones for delivering these scripts are comming closer and closer so please give me any information you have at hand. A very big Thank you in advance Michael PS: Excuse my poor english I am not a native speaker. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PSTUPG19
www.lostpassword.com -Original Message- From: Natacha Rivet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PSTUPG19 One of our user have a password protect his pst and don't remember it... If somebody have this tool (or another one) I'll really appreciated ! Regards Natacha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: O.O.O annoyances
Ask for your subscription fee back. or reply to the OOFs with the instructions for doing the PF thing -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Mark, you shouldn't post while on medication. - Ed Crowley, April 2001 - -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: O.O.O annoyances When is something going to be done regarding the people that won't/can't turn off OOO to the internet or subscribe themselves to a public folder so when people post they aren't spammed with these replies? John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Arcserve and Exchange
Hello, We ran Arcserve here for about 4 years until just recently. I stopped upgrading after the Y2K patches for ArcserveIT. Updates just seemed to provide less product functionality, and plunge you deeper into their milking of the product. Their default Raima database has problems if it grows too large. That is if you're backing up more than 3 servers, and you want to keep an on-line record of what has been backed up for more than 2 weeks you're probably going to have problems with it. I never had a problem with Restores. If it said it backed up the data, it did. This would be for general User files, as well as Exchange database restores. I'd restore Exchange to the lab every now and then, and as long as I'd go through the usual disaster recovery steps I never had a problem. We're now currently running Veritas the last couple months (BE 8.5/8.6). Product differentiation and annoying licensing baloney is just as strong here as it is with Computer Associates. Product support seems to be much better though. Given the prices they're charging for Backup software, drives, and media, if I were running a small shop I'd think about kludging together a server with a bunch of cheap IDE drives, and backup to disk. Swap the IDE drives like you would tape media. They cost about the same now, and might even have a better shelf life. Brent -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 5:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Arcserve and Exchange Is Arcserve and exchange a good choice? Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: O.O.O annoyances
I average about three to four OOO replies everytime I post to this list. Otherwise I don't see them. John -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances As long as we're on the topic, I have a question. If I've subscribed my Exchange mailbox to this, or any, list, and I turn on the OOOA, do the auto-replies go to the list itself, or do they go directly to the individuals who sent the messages? My suspicion is that Exchange based OOO replies will go to the list, rather than going to the original sender. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances Ask for your subscription fee back. or reply to the OOFs with the instructions for doing the PF thing -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Mark, you shouldn't post while on medication. - Ed Crowley, April 2001 - -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: O.O.O annoyances When is something going to be done regarding the people that won't/can't turn off OOO to the internet or subscribe themselves to a public folder so when people post they aren't spammed with these replies? John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PSTUPG19
Already search and nothings... - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:31 PM Subject: RE: PSTUPG19 Search google.com You will find it -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Natacha Rivet Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PSTUPG19 One of our user have a password protect his pst and don't remember it... If somebody have this tool (or another one) I'll really appreciated ! Regards Natacha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PSTUPG19
to see the password you need to have a valide license . - Original Message - From: Scharff, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:11 PM Subject: RE: PSTUPG19 www.lostpassword.com -Original Message- From: Natacha Rivet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PSTUPG19 One of our user have a password protect his pst and don't remember it... If somebody have this tool (or another one) I'll really appreciated ! Regards Natacha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: O.O.O annoyances
Original sender... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances As long as we're on the topic, I have a question. If I've subscribed my Exchange mailbox to this, or any, list, and I turn on the OOOA, do the auto-replies go to the list itself, or do they go directly to the individuals who sent the messages? My suspicion is that Exchange based OOO replies will go to the list, rather than going to the original sender. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances Ask for your subscription fee back. or reply to the OOFs with the instructions for doing the PF thing -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Mark, you shouldn't post while on medication. - Ed Crowley, April 2001 - -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: O.O.O annoyances When is something going to be done regarding the people that won't/can't turn off OOO to the internet or subscribe themselves to a public folder so when people post they aren't spammed with these replies? John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PSTUPG19
Not everyone works for free. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:40:30 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: to see the password you need to have a valide license . - Original Message - From: Scharff, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:11 PM Subject: RE: PSTUPG19 www.lostpassword.com -Original Message- From: Natacha Rivet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PSTUPG19 One of our user have a password protect his pst and don't remember it... If somebody have this tool (or another one) I'll really appreciated ! Regards Natacha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PSTUPG19
Thanks ! On www.google.com only 1 hit - a reference to the product... - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:40 PM Subject: Re: PSTUPG19 Not everyone works for free. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:40:30 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: to see the password you need to have a valide license . - Original Message - From: Scharff, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:11 PM Subject: RE: PSTUPG19 www.lostpassword.com -Original Message- From: Natacha Rivet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PSTUPG19 One of our user have a password protect his pst and don't remember it... If somebody have this tool (or another one) I'll really appreciated ! Regards Natacha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rejected SMTP mail
We're running Exchange 5.5 SP4. I have a problem with users from a certain domain not being able to successfully send mail to us. The ISP is the same for both of us and mail sent from this domain to us is forwarded by the ISP's Unix server running sendmail. In fact all our incoming mail is forwarded from this server and we don't have anyone else complaining of having delivery problems when sending mail to us. I have never seen any non-deliverable messages from this domain to ours in our logs or in the mailbox that NDR messages are sent to. The ISP claims our server is rejecting messages to users from this domain with a user unknown response based on their testing. I've turned up diagnostic logging on the IMC and MTA and don't see any evidence of any rejections. When mail is sent to my personal address the user at the other end and the ISP do not get an error message, however I never get any of the messages either. In fact a user at the other end says his server logs (Exchange 5.0) show that his messages were successfully delivered. Has anyone else seen behavior like this where messages are being rejected by the server but not being logged in anyway? Are there any other tools available to trace incoming messages sent from this domain to our server to verify that it is actually getting to our server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PSTUPG19
Sorry, I meant Deja.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Natacha Rivet Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: PSTUPG19 Already search and nothings... - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:31 PM Subject: RE: PSTUPG19 Search google.com You will find it -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Natacha Rivet Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PSTUPG19 One of our user have a password protect his pst and don't remember it... If somebody have this tool (or another one) I'll really appreciated ! Regards Natacha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PSTUPG19
FYI, here's a link I trust a bit more than earthlink.com/~some_guy/H4CKZ/ http://www.msexchange.org/how_to/passwords.htm -Original Message- From: Natacha Rivet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, September 10, 2001 01:49 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: PSTUPG19 Subject: Re: PSTUPG19 Thanks ! On www.google.com only 1 hit - a reference to the product... - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:40 PM Subject: Re: PSTUPG19 Not everyone works for free. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:40:30 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: to see the password you need to have a valide license . - Original Message - From: Scharff, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:11 PM Subject: RE: PSTUPG19 www.lostpassword.com -Original Message- From: Natacha Rivet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PSTUPG19 One of our user have a password protect his pst and don't remember it... If somebody have this tool (or another one) I'll really appreciated ! Regards Natacha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: O.O.O annoyances
It goes to the name in the FROM field. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? I think so, Brain, but pants with horizontal stripes make me look chubby. - -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances As long as we're on the topic, I have a question. If I've subscribed my Exchange mailbox to this, or any, list, and I turn on the OOOA, do the auto-replies go to the list itself, or do they go directly to the individuals who sent the messages? My suspicion is that Exchange based OOO replies will go to the list, rather than going to the original sender. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances Ask for your subscription fee back. or reply to the OOFs with the instructions for doing the PF thing -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Mark, you shouldn't post while on medication. - Ed Crowley, April 2001 - -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: O.O.O annoyances When is something going to be done regarding the people that won't/can't turn off OOO to the internet or subscribe themselves to a public folder so when people post they aren't spammed with these replies? John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rejected SMTP mail
Have they sent you (via fax or snail mail) transcripts of their SMTP sessions where your server allegedly returns an unknown user response? If not, ask them to do so, then analyze it. Try it yourself to see, if you have to. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - I'm not into working out. My philosophy: No pain, no pain. - -Original Message- From: Parker Race [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rejected SMTP mail We're running Exchange 5.5 SP4. I have a problem with users from a certain domain not being able to successfully send mail to us. The ISP is the same for both of us and mail sent from this domain to us is forwarded by the ISP's Unix server running sendmail. In fact all our incoming mail is forwarded from this server and we don't have anyone else complaining of having delivery problems when sending mail to us. I have never seen any non-deliverable messages from this domain to ours in our logs or in the mailbox that NDR messages are sent to. The ISP claims our server is rejecting messages to users from this domain with a user unknown response based on their testing. I've turned up diagnostic logging on the IMC and MTA and don't see any evidence of any rejections. When mail is sent to my personal address the user at the other end and the ISP do not get an error message, however I never get any of the messages either. In fact a user at the other end says his server logs (Exchange 5.0) show that his messages were successfully delivered. Has anyone else seen behavior like this where messages are being rejected by the server but not being logged in anyway? Are there any other tools available to trace incoming messages sent from this domain to our server to verify that it is actually getting to our server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tricky restore problem on NT4 SP6a 5.5 Ent SP4
What you need to do is to reinstall Exchange on the new W001 server, but choose to create a new site. Make sure you name the site exactly identical to the original site. Complete Exchange setup and disable the MTA on W001. Bring it to the same Service Pack level as your last successful backup. Then do a restore of both Directory and IS. Then enable the MTA and everything will be cool. S. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tricky restore problem on NT4 SP6a 5.5 Ent SP4 deep breath... I have a tricky problem that I need some advice on. I have two primary Exchange servers, w001 and w002, both in the same site. W002 has our IMS, public folders and most user mailboxes on it. W001 has about 20 mailboxes on it, no PF's and no IMS. A couple of days ago, W001 blue screened and died. Despite best efforts I have been unable to get it back up. The OS is on a RAID1 array, the log files are on a seperate RAID1 array and the stores on a RAID5 array. I have two problems here. One is the recovery of the data from the RAID 5 array. The other is this: If I reinstall the OS and Exchange, it won't let me connect the new server to the site with the server name W001. It wants me to delete the server W001 from the existing site first. Currently on W002 there is about 1000 items in the MTA waiting for the W001 server to come back on line. It is REALLY important that I don't lose this data. I suspect that if I delete W001 from the site, the stuff in the MTA on W002 will get binned also. So..any suggestions? Mark Hurst _ This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by Top Jobs on the Net for your protection and assurance using Star Internet services delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using Connector for Lotus Notes for Co-Existence.
Steve Bryant wrote an article on just this. Check it out. http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/stevebryant/bryant_c6p1.asp Matthew Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today! http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 -Original Message- From: TWaweru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using Connector for Lotus Notes for Co-Existence. Hi all, Is anyone using the Microsoft Exchange Connector for Lotus Notes for co-existence(as opposed to a migration tool) between the two mail systems? [XSRV 5.5 Notes 5.x] If so, kindly answer any or all of the following questions that am having difficulty getting answers for: - How long have you used it? What were your main reasons for electing to co-exist? How many users are you supporting on it? What kind of daily message volume? What has your general experience with the product been? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA personal DLs?
Hi List, Is there a way for users to access personal Distribution Lists from their Contacts folder via OWA without me having to write extra code? (Exchange 5.5 sp3, NT 4.0 sp6) I can only find references to Ex2K when searching TechNet for OWA / XWEB and DLs. Thanks, Will Grever _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send to no more than 25 at a time...
Exchange 2000 SP1, Windows 2000 SP2, GFI Mail Essentials 2000 (latest build), Dell PowerEdge 2550, dual P-III 733, 2GB RAM. Dear Exchange Gurus and Goddesses: Q: Is there a way to get Exchange to limit the number of recipients per message for a specific remote domain? More specifically, break a message with more than x number of recipients into multiple messages. If so, how? Explanation: This year, I allowed students to choose whether to use their own email address (mail enabled account) or an account on our system (mailbox enabled account). All students, regardless of their choice of accounts, are added to the All Students group, allowing the staff to send announcements as necessary. This works great except for one thing: messages sent to All Students always get an NDR with every Hotmail user listed. So, I ask Hotmail support why that might be happening and this is their reply: I understand how inconvenient it is on your part but I would like to inform you that we have only a limit of 25 recipients per messages. Great. If you try to include more than 25 Hotmail recipients in a single message, Hotmail will reject the entire message. So, I need a way to have Exchange break up the message into multiple messages with only 25 recipients per each when addressed to a Hotmail address. Any ideas? Other solutions? My only idea at this time is to create several Hotmail Users #x type groups, and then assign up to 25 Hotmail users per group to each of these groups, and add these groups to the All Students group. This is way more hands-on than I want to get on this; the rest of the process is completely automated. If I am to be FAQ'ed here, please point to a specific page. I have searched the FAQ, Slipstick, groups.google.com, northernlight.com, etc. and have found nothing that relates to this problem. Thank you, Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tricky restore problem on NT4 SP6a 5.5 Ent SP4
When you are restoring 5.5 you need to do the install as if it is going into a new site. Make sure you get the spelling of the old site and org exact including capitalization. Then run your restore. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tricky restore problem on NT4 SP6a 5.5 Ent SP4 No, it was added after but I'm not sure that W002 was the first either. I just know that it was there before W001 and it is the oldest server in the site. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2001 18:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tricky restore problem on NT4 SP6a 5.5 Ent SP4 Was W001 the first server in the site? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Law #16: Any given program, when running, is obsolete. - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tricky restore problem on NT4 SP6a 5.5 Ent SP4 deep breath... I have a tricky problem that I need some advice on. I have two primary Exchange servers, w001 and w002, both in the same site. W002 has our IMS, public folders and most user mailboxes on it. W001 has about 20 mailboxes on it, no PF's and no IMS. A couple of days ago, W001 blue screened and died. Despite best efforts I have been unable to get it back up. The OS is on a RAID1 array, the log files are on a seperate RAID1 array and the stores on a RAID5 array. I have two problems here. One is the recovery of the data from the RAID 5 array. The other is this: If I reinstall the OS and Exchange, it won't let me connect the new server to the site with the server name W001. It wants me to delete the server W001 from the existing site first. Currently on W002 there is about 1000 items in the MTA waiting for the W001 server to come back on line. It is REALLY important that I don't lose this data. I suspect that if I delete W001 from the site, the stuff in the MTA on W002 will get binned also. So..any suggestions? Mark Hurst _ This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by Top Jobs on the Net for your protection and assurance using Star Internet services delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This inbound message has been checked for all known viruses by Top Jobs on The Net for your protection and assurance using Star Internet services delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp _ This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by Top Jobs on the Net for your protection and assurance using Star Internet services delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS?
I don't think there is any such creature. Essentially you have 10% white space on your box. You are only going to reclaim 2GB of space by doing it now. What does he intend to do with this small amount of space? If you wait 3 months, is going to be better or worse, or what will it matter. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Derrick Stevenson Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS? Does anyone know the White Space:Data Ratio @ which Microsoft recommends running Defrag (eseutil /d) on your Exchange 5.5 Enterprise Server? Also, do you have a TechNet/KB article number that supports that figure? I have a 21GB Information Store which includes 2GB of white space on a 35GB RAID 5 partition, and would like to convince my manager that a defrag CAN POSITIVELY WAIT 'til our next scheduled maintenance period which is 3 months away. Thx in Advance! -Derrick __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
From my perspective, you're making this real hard. Inform the students that they can use any mailbox they want, but as far as the university is concerned official communications from staff and faculty are delivered to their Exchange mailbox. It is the student's responsibility to keep up with this information. Problem solved. If they complain let them know that this is how the real world works. Adjust. - Original Message - From: Greg Eytcheson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:41 PM Subject: Send to no more than 25 at a time... Exchange 2000 SP1, Windows 2000 SP2, GFI Mail Essentials 2000 (latest build), Dell PowerEdge 2550, dual P-III 733, 2GB RAM. Dear Exchange Guru's and Goddesses: Q: Is there a way to get Exchange to limit the number of recipients per message for a specific remote domain? More specifically, break a message with more than x number of recipients into multiple messages. If so, how? Explanation: This year, I allowed students to choose whether to use their own email address (mail enabled account) or an account on our system (mailbox enabled account). All students, regardless of their choice of accounts, are added to the All Students group, allowing the staff to send announcements as necessary. This works great except for one thing: messages sent to All Students always get an NDR with every Hotmail user listed. So, I ask Hotmail support why that might be happening and this is their reply: I understand how inconvenient it is on your part but I would like to inform you that we have only a limit of 25 recipients per messages. Great. If you try to include more than 25 Hotmail recipients in a single message, Hotmail will reject the entire message. So, I need a way to have Exchange break up the message into multiple messages with only 25 recipients per each when addressed to a Hotmail address. Any ideas? Other solutions? My only idea at this time is to create several Hotmail Users #x type groups, and then assign up to 25 Hotmail users per group to each of these groups, and add these groups to the All Students group. This is way more hands-on than I want to get on this; the rest of the process is completely automated. If I am to be FAQ'ed here, please point to a specific page. I have searched the FAQ, Slipstick, groups.google.com, northernlight.com, etc. and have found nothing that relates to this problem. Thank you, Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS?
There is no such Microsoft recommendation. The decision as to when to do an offline defrag is purely the customer's decision. - Original Message - From: Derrick Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:23 PM Subject: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS? Does anyone know the White Space:Data Ratio @ which Microsoft recommends running Defrag (eseutil /d) on your Exchange 5.5 Enterprise Server? Also, do you have a TechNet/KB article number that supports that figure? I have a 21GB Information Store which includes 2GB of white space on a 35GB RAID 5 partition, and would like to convince my manager that a defrag CAN POSITIVELY WAIT 'til our next scheduled maintenance period which is 3 months away. Thx in Advance! -Derrick __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA personal DLs?
My apologies if this was recently asked. I did not find it in the archives, and I've been out of town and did not thoroughly scan the conversation topics of the last few days. Will -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA personal DLs? Didn't we have the same question a couple of days ago? The answer is that neither Exchange 5.5 nor Exchange 2000 SP1 does provide this feature with OWA. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA personal DLs? Hi List, Is there a way for users to access personal Distribution Lists from their Contacts folder via OWA without me having to write extra code? (Exchange 5.5 sp3, NT 4.0 sp6) I can only find references to Ex2K when searching TechNet for OWA / XWEB and DLs. Thanks, Will Grever _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Atlanta/North Georgia Exchange Administrators
The South East Exchange Users Group (SEEUG) meeting will be held on 18 September starting at 6:00 P.M. Guest Speaker: A technical team from IXOS Software. Subject:Exchange Message Archiving (or, how to control/reduce your space requirements without resorting to Mailbox Size Limits) Location: Geac Enterprise Solutions headquarters building 66 Perimeter Center East (off of Ashford-Dunwoody Road) Atlanta, Georgia Take the I-285 perimeter highway to the Ashford-Dunwoody Exit. From I-285 East, turn Left at the top of the ramp From I-285 West, turn Right at the top of the ramp (Either way you are going OUTSIDE the Perimeter and towards Perimeter Mall.) At Perimeter Center East; Turn Right and proceed around to number 66. The Meeting will be held in the Presentation Room, First Floor, Executive Briefing Center. Refreshments will be provided. Please contact me directly/off list if you have questions. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Reduce your stress level; Resign as the General Manager of the Universe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
Can anyone in your org address the All Students DL? If it's just for administrative staff you could try training them to address this list in the BCC: field so the address info would not be sent along with the message. I agree with another post on this topic - I think you've gone too far to try and make your solution flexible for the student's benefit. Sometimes you need to draw the line - but as we all know (I've been reprimanded for arguing the point) sometimes technical justification and business justification standpoints just don't get along. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:41:47 -0500, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exchange 2000 SP1, Windows 2000 SP2, GFI Mail Essentials 2000 (latest build), Dell PowerEdge 2550, dual P-III 733, 2GB RAM. Dear Exchange Gurus and Goddesses: Q: Is there a way to get Exchange to limit the number of recipients per message for a specific remote domain? More specifically, break a message with more than x number of recipients into multiple messages. If so, how? Explanation: This year, I allowed students to choose whether to use their own email address (mail enabled account) or an account on our system (mailbox enabled account). All students, regardless of their choice of accounts, are added to the All Students group, allowing the staff to send announcements as necessary. This works great except for one thing: messages sent to All Students always get an NDR with every Hotmail user listed. So, I ask Hotmail support why that might be happening and this is their reply: I understand how inconvenient it is on your part but I would like to inform you that we have only a limit of 25 recipients per messages. Great. If you try to include more than 25 Hotmail recipients in a single message, Hotmail will reject the entire message. So, I need a way to have Exchange break up the message into multiple messages with only 25 recipients per each when addressed to a Hotmail address. Any ideas? Other solutions? My only idea at this time is to create several Hotmail Users #x type groups, and then assign up to 25 Hotmail users per group to each of these groups, and add these groups to the All Students group. This is way more hands-on than I want to get on this; the rest of the process is completely automated. If I am to be FAQ'ed here, please point to a specific page. I have searched the FAQ, Slipstick, groups.google.com, northernlight.com, etc. and have found nothing that relates to this problem. Thank you, Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS?
I don't know of a set ratio that MS recommends, I do believe the feedback that I remember seeing on this around here a while back was simply, why? I can say the only time in 3 years that I have ran a defrag was after our array went south, and that was only a matter of the DR procedures. Our DB is usually around 3-4 gig (small local gov) and our white space has ran anywhere from 50m to just over a gig. You are running just shy of 10%, where I usually run at about 15%. Again the question I would ask is why? Unless you need that extra 14gig of drive space for something else. Jeff Jeffrey R. Waters Senior Systems Engineer Information Technology, Hanover County -Original Message- From: Derrick Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS? Does anyone know the White Space:Data Ratio @ which Microsoft recommends running Defrag (eseutil /d) on your Exchange 5.5 Enterprise Server? Also, do you have a TechNet/KB article number that supports that figure? I have a 21GB Information Store which includes 2GB of white space on a 35GB RAID 5 partition, and would like to convince my manager that a defrag CAN POSITIVELY WAIT 'til our next scheduled maintenance period which is 3 months away. Thx in Advance! -Derrick __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS?
Derrick, just mention in your next conversation, in your most somber engineer voice, that the databases should be fluffy with white space rather than dense and defragged. fluffy is the word you're looking for. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derrick Stevenson Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS? To All That Replied: Thx 4 all the angles @ which I can approach my manager. I WILL use them in our next conversation. However, e-mail is a very sensitive subject for my CIO ever since an Internal Services survey was done and reported that of all IT services, e-mail is used by 99.9% of the client base. And since his boss preaches Customer Service 1st and above all other things, e-mail reliability is Paramount. So, my manager generally likes to see info from the manufacturer justifing what we engineers recommend should or should not be done, thus the quest for a TechNet/KB article. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS?
If E-mail reliability (aka - uptime) is paramount, the case is almost made for you. Do a simple cost/benefit analysis of taking the database off-line to defrag it. Cost = Downtime of Exchange server Benefit = 2Gb of additional free space (unless the server is low on space, benefit is almost 0) Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:44:15 -0500, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To All That Replied: Thx 4 all the angles @ which I can approach my manager. I WILL use them in our next conversation. However, e-mail is a very sensitive subject for my CIO ever since an Internal Services survey was done and reported that of all IT services, e-mail is used by 99.9% of the client base. And since his boss preaches Customer Service 1st and above all other things, e-mail reliability is Paramount. So, my manager generally likes to see info from the manufacturer justifing what we engineers recommend should or should not be done, thus the quest for a TechNet/KB article. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
Perhaps you could set each student up with an account on your mail server and then document for them how to pop it off into Hotmail. They'd still have to remember to click the Check other mail button (or however hotmail does that), but they wouldn't have to sign on to a seperate system. Joel K. Osborn Information Systems Technical Specialist Wisconsin Department of Transportation [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Send to no more than 25 at a time... From my perspective, you're making this real hard. Inform the students that they can use any mailbox they want, but as far as the university is concerned official communications from staff and faculty are delivered to their Exchange mailbox. It is the student's responsibility to keep up with this information. Problem solved. If they complain let them know that this is how the real world works. Adjust. - Original Message - From: Greg Eytcheson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:41 PM Subject: Send to no more than 25 at a time... Exchange 2000 SP1, Windows 2000 SP2, GFI Mail Essentials 2000 (latest build), Dell PowerEdge 2550, dual P-III 733, 2GB RAM. Dear Exchange Guru's and Goddesses: Q: Is there a way to get Exchange to limit the number of recipients per message for a specific remote domain? More specifically, break a message with more than x number of recipients into multiple messages. If so, how? Explanation: This year, I allowed students to choose whether to use their own email address (mail enabled account) or an account on our system (mailbox enabled account). All students, regardless of their choice of accounts, are added to the All Students group, allowing the staff to send announcements as necessary. This works great except for one thing: messages sent to All Students always get an NDR with every Hotmail user listed. So, I ask Hotmail support why that might be happening and this is their reply: I understand how inconvenient it is on your part but I would like to inform you that we have only a limit of 25 recipients per messages. Great. If you try to include more than 25 Hotmail recipients in a single message, Hotmail will reject the entire message. So, I need a way to have Exchange break up the message into multiple messages with only 25 recipients per each when addressed to a Hotmail address. Any ideas? Other solutions? My only idea at this time is to create several Hotmail Users #x type groups, and then assign up to 25 Hotmail users per group to each of these groups, and add these groups to the All Students group. This is way more hands-on than I want to get on this; the rest of the process is completely automated. If I am to be FAQ'ed here, please point to a specific page. I have searched the FAQ, Slipstick, groups.google.com, northernlight.com, etc. and have found nothing that relates to this problem. Thank you, Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS?
Wooho! -Original Message- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS? Derrick, I believe that the closest you will find a suggestion to be is if you delete a significant amount of content, therefore creating a significant amount of whitespace. When determining the amount of whitespace to delete at, it is probably much more important to look at trends instead of specific numbers. If you are staying well below the database size, and your transaction logs size don't indicate that your data transfer in and out of the store is that much, then I'd think about compacting the database. Note that defragmentation occurs nightly, is compaction that requires taking the server offline. 10% whitespace? No question that you do not need to compact your database. Ed -Original Message- From: Derrick Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:44 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS? Subject: RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS? To All That Replied: Thx 4 all the angles @ which I can approach my manager. I WILL use them in our next conversation. However, e-mail is a very sensitive subject for my CIO ever since an Internal Services survey was done and reported that of all IT services, e-mail is used by 99.9% of the client base. And since his boss preaches Customer Service 1st and above all other things, e-mail reliability is Paramount. So, my manager generally likes to see info from the manufacturer justifing what we engineers recommend should or should not be done, thus the quest for a TechNet/KB article. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
I'd think that the Hotmail User Groups scheme would only help if you could convince everyone to send separate messages to each of the Hotmail groups. The answer, as has been suggested below, is that hotmail users will have to get their messages from a regular Exchange account. It doesn't have to be that onerous though, as they can get both Exchange and Hotmail, either through the regular Hotmail web page, or through Outlook Express. -Peter -Original Message- From: Greg Eytcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 14:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time... No, only faculty and staff can send to All Students, but I'm not sure I understand how using BCC would help here. If I have 80 students with Hotmail accounts, and I BCC a message to my All Students group, isn't Exchange still going to just try to send a single message to Hotmail with 100 BCC recipients? Okay, never mind, I see you just answered that in another message -- As to yours and others replies about being too flexible/force them to use an Exchange account, etc: It -is- very flexible, it is completely automated and works perfectly (except for Hotmail). The students like it because they don't have to remember to check two accounts, the staff like it because students actually read their messages, the bloodsuckers ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Alumni/Development Office likes it because we get an address that will work after they leave the school and I like it because Yahoo, Hotmail, etc. take care of storing all of their .MP3's and pornography :-) Does anyone know if my idea of setting up Hotmail User Group #x is going to make any difference in how exchange chooses to send the message to Hotmail? If this will work, then I will just update the ISAPI dll to assign them randomly to one of these groups and be done with it. Thanks for all of the responses and suggestions so far! Greg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time... Can anyone in your org address the All Students DL? If it's just for administrative staff you could try training them to address this list in the BCC: field so the address info would not be sent along with the message. I agree with another post on this topic - I think you've gone too far to try and make your solution flexible for the student's benefit. Sometimes you need to draw the line - but as we all know (I've been reprimanded for arguing the point) sometimes technical justification and business justification standpoints just don't get along. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:41:47 -0500, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exchange 2000 SP1, Windows 2000 SP2, GFI Mail Essentials 2000 (latest build), Dell PowerEdge 2550, dual P-III 733, 2GB RAM. Dear Exchange Guru's and Goddesses: Q: Is there a way to get Exchange to limit the number of recipients per message for a specific remote domain? More specifically, break a message with more than x number of recipients into multiple messages. If so, how? Explanation: This year, I allowed students to choose whether to use their own email address (mail enabled account) or an account on our system (mailbox enabled account). All students, regardless of their choice of accounts, are added to the All Students group, allowing the staff to send announcements as necessary. This works great except for one thing: messages sent to All Students always get an NDR with every Hotmail user listed. So, I ask Hotmail support why that might be happening and this is their reply: I understand how inconvenient it is on your part but I would like to inform you that we have only a limit of 25 recipients per messages. Great. If you try to include more than 25 Hotmail recipients in a single message, Hotmail will reject the entire message. So, I need a way to have Exchange break up the message into multiple messages with only 25 recipients per each when addressed to a Hotmail address. Any ideas? Other solutions? My only idea at this time is to create several Hotmail Users #x type groups, and then assign up to 25 Hotmail users per group to each of these groups, and add these groups to the All Students group. This is way more hands-on than I want to get on this; the rest of the process is completely automated. If I am to be FAQ'ed here, please point to a specific page. I have searched the FAQ, Slipstick, groups.google.com, northernlight.com, etc. and have found nothing that relates to this problem. Thank you, Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
BCC results in a separate message sent to each non-Exchange recipient. If a single message were sent to all recipients at a domain, then each would know about the others, defeating the purpose of BCC. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time... Sorry - I think I spoke too soon (it's a very lethargic and overcast Monday here in SD). If more than 25 recipients were Hotmail addresses, BCC'ing wouldn't fix your problem since all the Hotmail addresses would still be sent using a single transmission. I'm not that familiar with GFI yet - but I'm getting ready to prototype and implement a Ex2k / GFI system for a smaller client. Have you considered trying to use GFI's content scanning mechanism to identify and re-address messages with large recipient lists? Does anyone know if there's a hook like this available out of the box? Just a thought. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:02:57 UT, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone in your org address the All Students DL? If it's just for administrative staff you could try training them to address this list in the BCC: field so the address info would not be sent along with the message. I agree with another post on this topic - I think you've gone too far to try and make your solution flexible for the student's benefit. Sometimes you need to draw the line - but as we all know (I've been reprimanded for arguing the point) sometimes technical justification and business justification standpoints just don't get along. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:41:47 -0500, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exchange 2000 SP1, Windows 2000 SP2, GFI Mail Essentials 2000 (latest build), Dell PowerEdge 2550, dual P-III 733, 2GB RAM. Dear Exchange Gurus and Goddesses: Q: Is there a way to get Exchange to limit the number of recipients per message for a specific remote domain? More specifically, break a message with more than x number of recipients into multiple messages. If so, how? Explanation: This year, I allowed students to choose whether to use their own email address (mail enabled account) or an account on our system (mailbox enabled account). All students, regardless of their choice of accounts, are added to the All Students group, allowing the staff to send announcements as necessary. This works great except for one thing: messages sent to All Students always get an NDR with every Hotmail user listed. So, I ask Hotmail support why that might be happening and this is their reply: I understand how inconvenient it is on your part but I would like to inform you that we have only a limit of 25 recipients per messages. Great. If you try to include more than 25 Hotmail recipients in a single message, Hotmail will reject the entire message. So, I need a way to have Exchange break up the message into multiple messages with only 25 recipients per each when addressed to a Hotmail address. Any ideas? Other solutions? My only idea at this time is to create several Hotmail Users #x type groups, and then assign up to 25 Hotmail users per group to each of these groups, and add these groups to the All Students group. This is way more hands-on than I want to get on this; the rest of the process is completely automated. If I am to be FAQ'ed here, please point to a specific page. I have searched the FAQ, Slipstick, groups.google.com, northernlight.com, etc. and have found nothing that relates to this problem. Thank you, Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 2000 Slow Logon from Windows 2000 Machines
Then my comment isn't much help. I think I said that, no? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 Slow Logon from Windows 2000 Machines what if you're not using SSL? -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Today is the difference between yesterday and tomorrow. - -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 12:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 Slow Logon from Windows 2000 Machines This may or may not help but be sure that if you're using SSL, the browser is not set to disable caching of encrypted stuff. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Taylor Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA 2000 Slow Logon from Windows 2000 Machines Can any give me an idea of why when my clients try and logon to OWA 2000 from a 2000 machine it will take at least 5 minutes to load the HTML page (even when there is only 2 new messages) but it will load very fast on a 98 or Millinium machine. If anyone could help me it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
At the risk of sounding stoopid (well, more stoopid) - this means that BCC'ing would solve his problem, yes? Hotmail wouldn't reject the messages because they'd be individually delivered. That's what I originally thought but my brain is working at around 40% capacity after this weekend and I didn't find anything solid when I did a quick search. If this is true, then Hotmail's anti-spam measures would serve nothing except to increase server traffic for these messages by 80 times (if there were 80 hotmail recipients). Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:15:17 -0700, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BCC results in a separate message sent to each non-Exchange recipient. If a single message were sent to all recipients at a domain, then each would know about the others, defeating the purpose of BCC. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time... Sorry - I think I spoke too soon (it's a very lethargic and overcast Monday here in SD). If more than 25 recipients were Hotmail addresses, BCC'ing wouldn't fix your problem since all the Hotmail addresses would still be sent using a single transmission. I'm not that familiar with GFI yet - but I'm getting ready to prototype and implement a Ex2k / GFI system for a smaller client. Have you considered trying to use GFI's content scanning mechanism to identify and re-address messages with large recipient lists? Does anyone know if there's a hook like this available out of the box? Just a thought. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:02:57 UT, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone in your org address the All Students DL? If it's just for administrative staff you could try training them to address this list in the BCC: field so the address info would not be sent along with the message. I agree with another post on this topic - I think you've gone too far to try and make your solution flexible for the student's benefit. Sometimes you need to draw the line - but as we all know (I've been reprimanded for arguing the point) sometimes technical justification and business justification standpoints just don't get along. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:41:47 -0500, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exchange 2000 SP1, Windows 2000 SP2, GFI Mail Essentials 2000 (latest build), Dell PowerEdge 2550, dual P-III 733, 2GB RAM. Dear Exchange Gurus and Goddesses: Q: Is there a way to get Exchange to limit the number of recipients per message for a specific remote domain? More specifically, break a message with more than x number of recipients into multiple messages. If so, how? Explanation: This year, I allowed students to choose whether to use their own email address (mail enabled account) or an account on our system (mailbox enabled account). All students, regardless of their choice of accounts, are added to the All Students group, allowing the staff to send announcements as necessary. This works great except for one thing: messages sent to All Students always get an NDR with every Hotmail user listed. So, I ask Hotmail support why that might be happening and this is their reply: I understand how inconvenient it is on your part but I would like to inform you that we have only a limit of 25 recipients per messages. Great. If you try to include more than 25 Hotmail recipients in a single message, Hotmail will reject the entire message. So, I need a way to have Exchange break up the message into multiple messages with only 25 recipients per each when addressed to a Hotmail address. Any ideas? Other solutions? My only idea at this time is to create several Hotmail Users #x type groups, and then assign up to 25 Hotmail users per group to each of these groups, and add these groups to the All Students group. This is way more hands-on than I want to get on this; the rest of the process is completely automated. If I am to be FAQ'ed here, please point to a specific page. I have searched the FAQ, Slipstick, groups.google.com, northernlight.com, etc. and have found nothing that relates to this problem. Thank you, Greg _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: O.O.O annoyances
It doesn't get sent to swynk.com - only the sender's E-mail address, so I don't think this will do anything. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:26:21 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time), Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Instead of the public folder thing, I specified not to send ooo to swynk.com. Internet Mail tab email domain add swynk.com advanced options. On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It goes to the name in the FROM field. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? I think so, Brain, but pants with horizontal stripes make me look chubby. - -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances As long as we're on the topic, I have a question. If I've subscribed my Exchange mailbox to this, or any, list, and I turn on the OOOA, do the auto-replies go to the list itself, or do they go directly to the individuals who sent the messages? My suspicion is that Exchange based OOO replies will go to the list, rather than going to the original sender. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances Ask for your subscription fee back. or reply to the OOFs with the instructions for doing the PF thing -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Mark, you shouldn't post while on medication. - Ed Crowley, April 2001 - -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: O.O.O annoyances When is something going to be done regarding the people that won't/can't turn off OOO to the internet or subscribe themselves to a public folder so when people post they aren't spammed with these replies? John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: O.O.O annoyances
But they don't go to swynk, they go to the user who sent the reply to a thread to swynk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances Instead of the public folder thing, I specified not to send ooo to swynk.com. Internet Mail tab email domain add swynk.com advanced options. On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It goes to the name in the FROM field. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? I think so, Brain, but pants with horizontal stripes make me look chubby. - -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances As long as we're on the topic, I have a question. If I've subscribed my Exchange mailbox to this, or any, list, and I turn on the OOOA, do the auto-replies go to the list itself, or do they go directly to the individuals who sent the messages? My suspicion is that Exchange based OOO replies will go to the list, rather than going to the original sender. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances Ask for your subscription fee back. or reply to the OOFs with the instructions for doing the PF thing -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Mark, you shouldn't post while on medication. - Ed Crowley, April 2001 - -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: O.O.O annoyances When is something going to be done regarding the people that won't/can't turn off OOO to the internet or subscribe themselves to a public folder so when people post they aren't spammed with these replies? John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information store limited to 16 GB ???
Store will stop and not start again. You cannot ignore it.. You must upgrade to enterprise to get past that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Laercio_SantosJr@Intervale Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information store limited to 16 GB ??? Is there a limitation of the information store database size ??? Is it 16Gb ??? What happens when I ignore it ??? Do I burn in hell till the end of time ??? Laercio Santos Jr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Information store limited to 16 GB ???
The standard has that limitation yes. (And prior to 5.5 , so did the Enterprise version) Don't ignore it. -Original Message- From: Laercio_SantosJr@Intervale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information store limited to 16 GB ??? Is there a limitation of the information store database size ??? Is it 16Gb ??? What happens when I ignore it ??? Do I burn in hell till the end of time ??? Laercio Santos Jr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Arcserve and Exchange
Yes, unless you want to do backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Van Huissteden, Adriaan Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Arcserve and Exchange Is Arcserve and exchange a good choice? Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send a meeting request to Internet
Exchange 5.5 SP4 I sent a meeting request to a user who works in a different company but using Exchange as well. The user received the meeting request and opened it. It showed up just as a plain text message. The user was not able to accept or reject it. I thought it was something to do with the IMS connector or SMTP/MIME stuf. How can I do something to allow an Internet user may see the meeting request in the Microsoft Meeting Request form format so that he can accept it? Thanks, Phillip Yan PMC-Sierra _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: O.O.O annoyances
um.. i knew that. 1. Open mouth. 2. insert foot. :whine Using a public folder doesn't work for my situation, since i use pine. :end On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Don Ely wrote: But they don't go to swynk, they go to the user who sent the reply to a thread to swynk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances Instead of the public folder thing, I specified not to send ooo to swynk.com. Internet Mail tab email domain add swynk.com advanced options. On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It goes to the name in the FROM field. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? I think so, Brain, but pants with horizontal stripes make me look chubby. - -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances As long as we're on the topic, I have a question. If I've subscribed my Exchange mailbox to this, or any, list, and I turn on the OOOA, do the auto-replies go to the list itself, or do they go directly to the individuals who sent the messages? My suspicion is that Exchange based OOO replies will go to the list, rather than going to the original sender. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances Ask for your subscription fee back. or reply to the OOFs with the instructions for doing the PF thing -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Mark, you shouldn't post while on medication. - Ed Crowley, April 2001 - -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: O.O.O annoyances When is something going to be done regarding the people that won't/can't turn off OOO to the internet or subscribe themselves to a public folder so when people post they aren't spammed with these replies? John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS?
Excellent approach Ed! For the past 2 months the white space has been in the 2-2.5GB range. So, there's no real danger of space consumption. Unless someone does find a TechNet article, I believe I now have plenty of reasoning points. These list serves are useful. :-) Thx All! _ Derrick Stevenson Sr. Technical Engineer Advisor mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] National Rural Electric Cooperative Association _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Send to no more than 25 at a time...
At 03:15 PM 9/10/2001 -0700, Ed Crowley wrote: BCC results in a separate message sent to each non-Exchange recipient. Actually, this appears to not be true. Watching the mail come from our 5.5 IMS to our sendmail relay, only one message comes out, with two different envelope recipients, same as normal, even when both recipients are specified as BCC: recipients. In my understanding, BCC: in SMTP is done by having the envelope recipients (required for mail routing) not appear in the *header* (visible by the end-user). A mail admin along the route may still see the envelope recipients broken down into chunks (usually by domain) as usual. Hope that helps, Joel Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: O.O.O annoyances
Nice to see everyone still whining about out of office messages. I'll be able to pick up right where I left off. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances It doesn't get sent to swynk.com - only the sender's E-mail address, so I don't think this will do anything. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:26:21 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time), Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Instead of the public folder thing, I specified not to send ooo to swynk.com. Internet Mail tab email domain add swynk.com advanced options. On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It goes to the name in the FROM field. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? I think so, Brain, but pants with horizontal stripes make me look chubby. - -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances As long as we're on the topic, I have a question. If I've subscribed my Exchange mailbox to this, or any, list, and I turn on the OOOA, do the auto-replies go to the list itself, or do they go directly to the individuals who sent the messages? My suspicion is that Exchange based OOO replies will go to the list, rather than going to the original sender. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances Ask for your subscription fee back. or reply to the OOFs with the instructions for doing the PF thing -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Mark, you shouldn't post while on medication. - Ed Crowley, April 2001 - -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: O.O.O annoyances When is something going to be done regarding the people that won't/can't turn off OOO to the internet or subscribe themselves to a public folder so when people post they aren't spammed with these replies? John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: O.O.O annoyances
So where ya been? Out OF the Office I'd guess... ;-) At 06:33 PM 9/10/2001 -0500, you wrote: Nice to see everyone still whining about out of office messages. I'll be able to pick up right where I left off. (:= Great Cthulhu Jones CEO, R'lyeh Consulting http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu http://www.bad-managers.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances It doesn't get sent to swynk.com - only the sender's E-mail address, so I don't think this will do anything. Eric On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:26:21 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time), Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Instead of the public folder thing, I specified not to send ooo to swynk.com. Internet Mail tab email domain add swynk.com advanced options. On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It goes to the name in the FROM field. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering? I think so, Brain, but pants with horizontal stripes make me look chubby. - -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances As long as we're on the topic, I have a question. If I've subscribed my Exchange mailbox to this, or any, list, and I turn on the OOOA, do the auto-replies go to the list itself, or do they go directly to the individuals who sent the messages? My suspicion is that Exchange based OOO replies will go to the list, rather than going to the original sender. -Peter -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances Ask for your subscription fee back. or reply to the OOFs with the instructions for doing the PF thing -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Mark, you shouldn't post while on medication. - Ed Crowley, April 2001 - -Original Message- From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: O.O.O annoyances When is something going to be done regarding the people that won't/can't turn off OOO to the internet or subscribe themselves to a public folder so when people post they aren't spammed with these replies? John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
