Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+
per day but had only 5 or 6 yesterday.
:-(
-Original Message-
From: Lloyd, D (Dave) (IT Systems) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 05:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Test
Really sorry to do
Ooh, I like horror books.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange clustering
I'm planning my first book, Exchange Clusters: Why Bother?
Ed Crowley
Compaq Computer
I'm waiting eagerly for publication :-)
-Original Message-
From: Amit Zinman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 09:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange clustering
Ooh, I like horror books.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL
Another good one is to let your IS and/or logfile space run out very rapidly
from a mail loop (use blat or the reskit simulation tools for the loop).
See if you really can get that server back up and running with some extra
disks within your SLA period the mail loop cleared up before it goes
In my experience, I just leave my house exchange server on for long
enough and that'll make it go splat :-)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 10:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup]
Hi all,
Just a few questions that I have.. Would appreciate input :-)
Firstly, is it unusual for the Exchange server to keep looking at the
floppy drive?
A few of the servers here do - and it's only since installing Exchange
2k. Seems to be only once every 5 minutes or so, and I can only
We had a similar problem - traced it to the offline folders, just delete
those and re-create and the problem went away.
For us it started after we moved people from one server to another.
HTH
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Chris T Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 October 2001
We are a small dept within the University - approx 100 users, NT4 Server and
Exchange 5.5 with latest service packs and patches, the user's workstations
are running Win98 and Outlook 2000.
Recently our HOD has had problems sending email to users within the
University, all other email functions
NDR? Error messages? Please post them.
-Original Message-
From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Send/Reply
We are a small dept within the University - approx 100
users, NT4 Server and Exchange 5.5 with
Are these 'problem' users in his personal address book - possibly with an
old invalid address ?
-Original Message-
From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 13:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Send/Reply
We are a small dept within the University - approx 100
Not familiar with your first issue, but your second problem is
consistent with a locked account/expired password... I could be miles
off, but it's identical behaviour to what I see with Exch 5.5
--
Jad Mouracadé
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, we call that the weekend.
-Original Message-
From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 04:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Oddly enough I'm hardly getting any mail either - Usually get about 150+ per
day but had only 5 or 6
Nah as in just mail from everywhere.
Must have been something going on that everyone in the world was invited
to, but I wasn't :-(
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 13:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Yeah, we call
ha ha hah aa ROFL :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: 29 October 2001 05:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Yeah, we call that the weekend.
-Original Message-
From: Joe D. Llewelyn
Here's a thought: If you think your Internet EMAIL is down, why not TEST
to a FREE webbased email system like HOTMAIL?
That way you only bother yourself, and not the 4000 people on this list.
Just a thought.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
This is an example of the message received, it's always the same format and
the last line MSEXCH: IMS always contains the same information.
I've tried looking in Technet for any of the numbers listed but can't seem
to find anything on this particular problem.
The users he's trying to send
I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how much you know,
despite your bigshot attitude!
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator
Thank you
Y'know Bob, he might even find that in the FAQ...
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 08:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Here's a thought: If you think your Internet EMAIL is down, why not TEST to
a FREE webbased
I believe that your HOD is being blocked somewhere externally (as the
message is going through the IMS). It looks as though his address is blocked
by your main servers (I assume that you route all other non-departmental
mail through to a central system). Speak to the mail admins for the rest of
administrative prohibition = he's being blocked. Try contacting the
Graham.Mcdonald2Strath.ac.uk, and find out why their email system is
blocking your user.
-Original Message-
From: Ty Bradley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Give them 'modify user attributes' on the mailbox container level. This
works in my
environment of Exchange 5.5 SP4 and IIS 4.0.
- Mort Billups
Crowley Maritime Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Saul Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:20 PM
To:
Well, I would scout around for configuration settings that point to your
floppy drive.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
I thought the biggest mistake KMart ever made was moving the popcorn machine
way back into the Little Caesars corner [1]. This is from someone whose mom
regularly took him to the S. S. Kresge luncheon counter.
[1] The second-biggest mistake.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq
I'll have to take your word for it on the gaelic - nice job!
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
Oiche na Samhna ann
Solas na gheallaigh thar bharr
Siuil an
This is obviously Scottish or French Gaelic or reeealy bad Irish Gael.
:)
E.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori
Sent: 29 October 2001 06:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Haiku Friday
I'll have to take your word
One MAPI public store. You can have more non-MAPI public stores as long as
they're within the one storage group.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071
-- Way to go
you wouldn't by chance have OL97 loaded on that server? look at q173564
-Original Message-
From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and various things about it..
Hi all,
Just a few questions
Or how about an AV product?
-Original Message-
From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and various things about it..
Hi all,
Just a few questions that I have.. Would appreciate input :-)
at the local Super K, the popcorn machine is right by the front door!
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Now, Pinky,
Well we did have a meeting of the Inner Circle. Perhaps you missed the
invitation, or maybe you weren't on the guest list?
Anyways, I hear Dean has started a new mail list for the Inner Circle[1]
that is hosted at zzzptm.com. If you have been nominated to participate then
an invitation will be
Two really good pieces of news today: 'Jedi knight' is officially recognised
as a religion in the UK (well it has been given a filing number by the
people @ the statistics bureau) as 10,000 people put it down as their
'practiced faith' in the census earlier on this year and.and there are
In OWA2000 there are three ways you get logged off. One is to close the
browser which closes the session and clears any cached authenticated pages
so no one else can use your session. Two is to wait for 4 minutes (Default
timeout setting for OWA2000). Or spend a bunch off money for
I've been looking through technet, but I can't seem to find out the
information regarding forms that I'm looking for.
Can someone tell me where I can find instructions on how to remove custom
forms from the forms library?
Thanks in advance.
Ah yes, the ability of a governmental body to recognize something as
legitimate just because there are enough ignorant/stupid/silly/mischievous
people that can write something on a form.
Of course, on a list that normally contains a lot of off topic eMail, at
least most of it tries to tie it
humph, how serious you are. Ah wellstill good news about Glastonbury for
those cool enough to know what that is.
I also ask you to notice that I sent the messages on a 'quite' mail day.
Poppies and bourbon biscuits (as in today I will be mostly eating~)
E.
-Original Message-
From:
yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
+44 (0)1392 459155
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 23:56
To: Exchange
Bit like what most of Sir Bonfield's speeches are like then..
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 16:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
yes. Completely Off topic and Completely Irrelevant.
Regards
Mr
Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for
being a smart arse :)
Here is the relevancy: Lots of techies like Star Wars and lots are cool
enough to know what Glastonbury is, lots of techies hang out on this
listmake the connection.
E.
-Original
Dear Anyone,
We have a dedicated Connector server (Exchange 5.5 SP2) set up which
connects an Exchange 5.5 environment to a Lotus Notes environment. This
server only houses a X400 Connector and a Connector for Lotus Notes (so no
Mailboxes). I know there isnt an anti-virus package that can scan
smart@ss
There are even some people here that can check out rumours before
repeating them to thousands of people on a mailing list.
/sm@rtass
http://www.snopes.com/religion/jedi.htm
Jim Helfer
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Elizabeth,
I have been to Glastonbury a few times. I also visited the washroom this
morning, I dont, however, feel the need to inform the other list members
about it.
And im afraid the connection is still crap and nothing to do with exchange
however you phrase it.
-Original Message-
I read it in the Independentwhich reported that Jedi Knight was given a
filing number. Are you calling the beloved national canon a liar?
E.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Helfer
Sent: 29 October 2001 08:28
To: Exchange
Heard about the Jedi thing two months ago.
On the radio whilst I was fiddling with my Exchange server.
So now it's sort-of relevant to the topic. Take it to a 1-2-1 email
session kidz.
:-(
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 October 2001
Having trouble with doing a reply to all or copying my self on a message
to be sent out. It goes to the other people but I don't get a message back
from CC or reply to all.. We are relaying from sendmail server into
Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 sp 6a. Using a aliases in the Linux world which
looks
Glastonbury is in Star Wars? Where?
:)
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 October 2001 00:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
Give the boy a million points for observation and a kick in the pants for
being a
How about next time you start the thread off with something
like I have
lots of silly users that are circulating an eMail about
writing in Jedi
knight as a religion because we have lots of dolts in the UK
government [1]
that will actually believe them. How can I filter out this
whats star wars?
Regards
James Johnston
BT Ignite Solutions, eCRM
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DDI : 01392 459076
Cell: 07771 738456
Fax : 01392 431025
Web : http://www.Ignite.Com/
British
Check the FAQ.
JDE
-Original Message-
From: .DL Helpdesk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: OT - Luke save the Queen
whats star wars?
Regards
James Johnston
BT Ignite Solutions, eCRM
Email
Hm.
Jedi Knight is on the list at number 896
After entry 700 - Other Religion
Lumped in the 800 category with Heathen and Atheist
Doesn't really count, does it? I suppose we could wait another ten years to
see if we can get Sith Lord in there as well - MWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
-Original
For managing Exchange 2000 from my W2k Prof. I must install Exchange System
Manager snap-in from the cd by selecting to only install the management
option.
Question: as in Exchange 5.5, also must I install in some way Exchange 2k
Service Packs or patches in the workstation ?
Thanks
Javier..
You need to configure your IMC to receive all of the host names used on the
Sendmail side. Along with that, you might consider rerouting all of the
extra hosts to your primary domain. Things will appear more seamless that
way.
D
-Original Message-
From: ronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I said there were dolts in government, not implying that those that support
the dolts are dolts. Nor did I imply that ALL public office holders are
dolts. However, if you want to align yourself with the dolts, then please
feel free to do so. :-)
I don't worry about users sending large multimedia
Our exchange 5.5 server with sp4 installed just froze up. It was not
responding to outlook clients and the cursor was not responsive. I had to
resort to the reset button to restart it. Is is possible that a malformed
mail message could have caused this? Is there a post SP4 patch that might
On the other hand, it has been a little slow today, now Rich T seems almost
to have learnt how to use Exchange.
Or at least to look in the FAQ.
Or at least not to bother asking any more :)
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29,
Check the event logs.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
+44 (0)1392 459155
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Thomas M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 16:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: EX5.5 Server just
Dollars to donuts your HD went belly-up[1].
At least that would be the first thing to check on a perfectly running
Exchange server that nobody's been monkeying with.
Check your event/RAID logs (whichever is appropriate).
--Andrew Duey, MCSE
[1] always wanted to use that phrase[2]
[2] and go
Okay Dean, I've sent out invitations for the new Secret Cabal mailing list
[1] to everyone that we identified and voted on. You should start seeing the
Join submissions very soon. Remember we need to make sure that all new
members understand that this list must remain a secret and it's
Doug Hampshire would like to recall the message, Secret Cabal mailing
list.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
In your IMS properties in Exchange, on the routing tab, add every additional
domain (host) name to the routing. I configure mine to reroute to my
primary domain name so all is seamless and is transparent to everyone.
Don't use the email address, just use your .com.
D
-Original
I'm sure he would.[1] 8-{)
...Joel
[1] Interesting that the secretary designate of the Secret Cabal doesn't
know enough about Exchange that he thought this would work.[2]
[2] Yes, I know he was kidding.[3]
[3] so am I, hence the bearded mustachioed smiley wearing glasses. [4]
[4] 8-{)
Hello! I am new to this subject, please bear with me.
Our users would like to access their emails from outside using our dial-up
connection with ATT. Once they dial to ATT they will be put on our
network via our T1 connection with ATT. We do not want to use OWA. Is
there any one using a
VPN...
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
Hello! I am new to this subject, please bear with me.
Our users would like to access their emails from
Yes, I'm still here I like Pauls Robichauxs book it help understand
exchange. Also reading the post is more fun than actually posting them. I
actually get to laugh with you guys instead of being laughed at. I also did
post something about exchange in this off topic. HEHE
-Original
I have RAS,VPN
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
Hello! I am new to this subject, please bear with me.
Our users would like to access their emails
I'd create a VPN over your existing public network.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Claude [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
I am not very familiar with RAS. Do you know whether RAS
what do you have 2000, NT4
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
Go to technet and type in article Q162847
-Original Message-
From:
Hello all,
I have run into the event entry below twice in the past month on two
different servers. Everything I find on this is specific to clusters and
I am not running any clusters. Q296073 states The event ID 9582
referenced in this article is only a concern for Active/Active cluster
LOL! Man that made my day!
S.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Quick Pole: How big is your ex5.5 IS?
Having shopped at KMart, I can say that the answer is probably yes.
Ed
If you don't have a .NET server, then there's not much need for the .NET
admin tools is there?
If you have an MSDN subscription, you may be able to get it. Otherwise the
standard channels of your Microsoft representative would be the next path.
In your case, you would want to do VPN.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jean-Claude
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Accessing mails via remote Dial-up
I am not very familiar with RAS. Do you
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP2
Outlook 2000 SP1
Hi all,
I am running the Auto Accept Script from exchangecode.com. I have a
secretary that did something that is forcing me to directly access the
Calendar for the resource running the script but whenever I try to access it
Outlook2000 just
Use OSTs to access the mail offline, after synching online.
OWA will be faster, you realise...
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who
want rain without thunder
I think you answered your own question:
we do not use DNS nor Hosts entry for @x2.abc.com as we just indicate
the IP of that host in the forward all messages to this domain..that Hosts
receives messages just from us so they do not have any presence on the
internet...other than its IP address
If
If there's no indication of problems with the disk, try checking the
transaction logs to see if a large number of logs were generated in a short
period of time corresponding to the hang. I've seen instances where 5.5 SP4
servers become unresponsive to clients as a result of someone attempting to
well that is not what is happening here...currently the queues of messages
is building up...and the settings are the same...but the ip is not
availableremember that we are instruicting Exchange directly to send
@x2.abc.com to specific IP...why do we need DNS in that scenario?
--er
Sounds like you might have corrupted meeting notice. See technet for post
sp4 fixes for CDO. CDO is what the auto-accept script uses.
Michael Semiglia
-Original Message-
From: John Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
OWA without SSL = BAD...
You can register the SSL cert under a generic name instead of the actual
server name, that way, it doesn't matter wether you are going to change
the server name later or not.
Andrew,
MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL
Just for my own edification, what was it?
-Original Message-
From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird message from System Administrator
I figured it out myself, Mr. Manners! That shows how
I am currently going through the same thing. I got the updated CDO.DLL but
it did not fix the problem. I will let you know what finally fixes it.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (360)
Or http.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Std exchange 2000 vs Enterprise
Have you checked the FAQ?
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Rich Gomes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 12:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Only Admins can
We had a similar problem where the system just locked. Console froze and
only resort was to power cycle the system. If the system totally locked up
it may indicate a hardware problem. At least in our case it was. Check to
see if you might have some bad memory in the system. We had a couple
oh-HO! I see. Must get copy of Exchange 2000 to play with at home...
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by
those who are dumber. - Plato
-Original
I'm about to set up a limit for my users for their mailboxes. I want to
edit the system administrator message that gets sent out. Is this
possible? If so, how do I edit it?
_
List posting FAQ:
I moved from a IMAP/SMTP mail server to using Exchange 2K and I have
some general questions about the setup and configuration. I have a small
home network with 5 servers and a few clients.
1. I want to connect to the Exchange server through my NAT router. I
read that I need to setup static ports
This may not be strictly an Exchange Server question, but I am interested in
how a message can fail to be delivered and no error message is received by
the sender.
We run ES 5.5 SP4 on NT4.0 SP6. There have been no recent configuration
changes apart from the installation of SP4. The system has
Hi,
I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following:
- search an Exchange 5.5 information store for a designated attachment
- search an Exchange 5.5 information store and provide detailed information
on each mailbox with the amount of attachments they have as well as their
size
Hi,
I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following:
- search an Exchange 5.5 information store for a designated attachment
- search an Exchange 5.5 information store and provide detailed information
on each mailbox with the amount of attachments they have as well as their
size
Hi,
I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following:
- search an Exchange 5.5 information store for a designated attachment
- search an Exchange 5.5 information store and provide detailed information
on each mailbox with the amount of attachments they have as well as their
size
I suggest, as have others, that you look at a possible hard disk failure.
The only time I have experienced this situation is following a scsi disk
failure. On first reset the disk showed up as failed, a power cycle luckily
got it started. It has now been replaced.
David
-Original
Symantec Security Response - W32.Nimda.D@mmSymantec Security Response
http://securityresponse.symantec.com
W32.Nimda.D@mm
Discovered on: October 29, 2001
Last Updated on: October 29, 2001 at 07:00:35 AM PST
W32.Nimda.D@mm is an new version of W32.Nimda.A@mm that contains
Have a look at:
http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/pressrel/uk/20011017mm.html
Let me know if you need any more info about Sophos from a user's viewpoint,
although I have not used the above.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Symantec Security Response - W32.Nimda.D@mmSymantec Security Response
http://securityresponse.symantec.com
W32.Nimda.D@mm
Discovered on: October 29, 2001
Last Updated on: October 29, 2001 at 07:00:35 AM PST
W32.Nimda.D@mm is an new version of W32.Nimda.A@mm that contains
Hi,
I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following:
- search an Exchange 5.5 information store for a designated attachment
- search an Exchange 5.5 information store and provide detailed information
on each mailbox with the amount of attachments they have as well as their
size
Youlose.
Assuming this to be Exchange5.5, this is hardcoded and not editable.
Section 3.35:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_sec3.htm
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 7:39 AM
To:
No.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox limit
I'm about to set up a limit for my users for their mailboxes. I want to
edit the system administrator message that gets
Click ye to FAQ 3.35
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox limit
I'm about to set up a limit for my users for their mailboxes. I want to
edit the system administrator
- Use ExMerge
- Write custom code
S.
-Original Message-
From: Treacy, Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: mailbox attachment utility
Hi,
I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following:
- search an
Mike,
1. The static ports are only if you want to connect to it from the Internet.
Since you also have your Exchange server configured as DC for your AD, it
won't be wise to open up access to it from the Internet. Why not deploy a
VPN solution for Internet access?
2. With 10 users the overhead
Im interested in a utility that prevents multiple posts on the same subject
within a 5 minute time span.
-Original Message-
From: Treacy, Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: utility to identify attachments
Hi,
I am
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
