Whenever I've partnered with Microsoft Consulting Services, they've agreed
with me that it isn't the best idea to put front-end servers in the DMZ.
But some organizations are hell-bent on doing it their way. It isn't that
it's the Microsoft Way, but if a customer demands it their way, Microsoft
There's a whitepaper on the Exchange 2000 web site about using ISA.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davinder Gupta
Sent:
Have you verified that permissions are properly set?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Lavoie
Sent: Tuesday, December 09,
Did you re-install the backup agents after installing the hotfixes to all
the servers?
-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
Boss says organization has probable cause. Wants best way to copy users data for
perusal by others (inbox, sent, and deleted folders).
Please assist.
TIA
Regards,
Orin
_
List posting FAQ:
Exmerge
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Snooping
Boss says organization has probable cause. Wants best way to copy users data
for perusal by others (inbox, sent, and deleted
Have you got an upgraded key from Veritas?
I had this same problem with a new Exchange installation a couple of
weeks ago. Putting the existing key for Exchange gave me the mailboxes
but didn't give me the Information stores option.
A quick call to Veritas customer support got me a new key and
Doesn't Exmerge still keep user permissions?
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:40 AM
To:
-Original Message-
From: Holt, Miles
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:49 AM
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
Yes. In the case of the 9.1 install (no hot fixes needed), I actually migrated the two
mailboxes on the
Not on a pst.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Snooping
Doesn't Exmerge still keep user permissions?
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
I have not tried that yet as I dread waiting on hold for an hour for a tech (if you
are forced to pay for support in the first place should you get to speak
with a tech without being on hold that long?). I guess that may be my next step but I
have no idea why I would need a new key for it other
Do'h! Sorry, brain freeze. I knew better.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:51 AM
To:
Ed,
It takes 7 ports from front end server for windows 2000 communication plus
the exchange ports to make it work. So my only argument is that if the front
end box gets compromised, hackers has access to those seven ports and
wherever they terminate. However my putting the front end server on the
Be sure to tell exmerge to recover items from dumpster
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Snooping
Do'h! Sorry, brain freeze. I knew better.
Eric
I didn't call Technical, I called sales to query my license, then they
put me through to Customer Services. They read my license information
from their computer and I was away.
The reason they told me was that it was for a different version and I
only could have it because I was under
Client has a laptop using XP Pro, Outlook XP and a DSL line using POP3 to
my remotely located Exch2ksp3 box. About a week ago, the 'enter network
password' message started coming up, even though she had not changed her
password (it's set so it doesn't expire and can't be changed). Today she
Exchange 5.5 SP4
Windows 2000 SP4
When I go into the permissions tab of one of my users and choose add I get
this message
Insufficient System resources exist to complete the requested service
Microsoft Windows NT
ID no: 0xc00205aa
Has anyone else seen this? I have loaded the exchange admin
I am pretty sure I saw this a few weeks ago. Fix was to stop and restart the
directory service.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua
(Greenville)
Sent: 10 December 2003 16:04
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Insufficient
Just tried that and it did not work...
Any other ideas?
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System
Any AV software running on the Exch Server?
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources
Just tried that and it did not work...
Any other
Ok guys, forget the complicated stuff, I figured all of the scripting
part out...now my problem is still syntax related I am sure, but I am
not getting the desired results. When I do a manual pull I get 15K some
odd mailboxes but when I do it with the script I only get about 7K. Now
looking at
Yes (sorry for got to add that) Groupshield for Exchange...
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System
Ed,
Your lack of professionalism is truly staggering.
Why are you asking here? We're all just Microsoft vendor whores.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeffry Where's my slippers?
_
John Bowles
Exchange Engineer
OIG/HHS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:36 AM
To: Exchange
Well, there ya go.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:35 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources
Yes (sorry for got to add that) Groupshield for Exchange...
Joshua
Ok now can you expand on that Groupshield has been on this machine
for over a year and we are just recently experiencing the problem
Joshua Morgan
AIMCO
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W. 864 239-1015
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Bad dat/update Who knows. Heck, I could be wrong. But I would start
looking there first.
-Original Message-
From: Morgan, Joshua (Greenville) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Insufficient System resources
Are you exporting the subcontainers as well?
Your export.ini should look something like this:
basepoint=/o=yourorgname
exportobject=mailbox
informationlevel=full
subcontainers=yes
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
In the help file it says basepoint default is null which means entire
organization, and subcontainers do not need to be selected if I can get
it to look at the GAL like the GUI does...at least that is my
understanding of it. I will try this...
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy
Checks MS website for Microsoft GroupWise Server
H... Seems to me this is an Exchange list.
Did you have a question pertaining to MICROSOFT Exchange Server?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:24 PM
To: Exchange
You also set the user's account to co-delivery to a second e-mail account as
a quick dirty way to journal the account.
under Delivery Options, be sure to check the delivery to both recipients.
This does not capture outbound mail, where most likely is the best evidence
your looking for. If they
In times like these, IRC commands like /pimp-slap user would be real
handy.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
You could always simply gain access to said users system and give perms that way as
well.
The simply open the needed folders accordingly from permissioned users outlook...
John Parker, MCSE
IS Admin.
Senior Technical Specialist
Alpha Display Systems.
Alpha Video
7711 Computer Ave.
Edina, MN.
I'd like to modify that a bit if I could... ;o)
pimp-slap decklertheheckler
You are aware that this is an Exchange list right?
/pimp-slap decklertheheckler
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange
Ed, thanks for your response.for troubleshooting purposes I've gone as far as to
give full control to everything in the security list for that object, including
granting full control to the everyone and authenticated users security groups.
I've also specifically added myself and and a
blatant sarcasm
Or... You could setup your own Echlon system and capture all the packets
that you want. I think that Carnegie Mellon University might be able to
help you out with that.
/blatant sarcasm
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel:
We are looking at Networker and NetBackup for
enterprise backup solutions. We would like to so the
usual mailbox backup and also snap backups from SAN
BCV's. I would like to hear from the members about
these two products before we actually go ahead with
the purchase. We are using 5.5 and will
Joshua, I had Groupshield running for over two years on a 5.5 box then one
day it started screwing things up. I spent weeks with their support to
try and figure it out but we never did. Once I removed it and went with
Trend, I haven't looked back since. It's definitely worth looking into as
a
However, if you absolutely must persist with this bloody stupid way of doing
things, here's a reghack for the server that'll do what you need it to do.
It was originally pointed to me by the below Mr. Webb's lovely wife... :)
Oh, the text below says HKLM. Put it in HKCU as well, same tree path.
I have all my PF's homed on an Exchange 5.5 server in the same site as my
first Exchange 2003 server.
I have added the ADC for PF and replicated all PF's to the Exchange 2003
server as well.
However, any mailbox moved to the Exchange 2003 server cannot see the Public
Folders. I have modified the
I just saw this Andy, you are so true that is what the legal group would
say. I did however turn this around here, we are subject to FOIA, I was
able to make the argument against .pst's under that in that we could never
show due diligence to giving FOIA access if we had 600 pst files running
That is exactly what I was looking for. We are running BES 2.1 now but I
am ready to switch over to 3.x very soon. I have already switched all my
rules back to the server because I was being flooded with Blackberry
messaages where it saw them before the rule kicked in. Does anyone have any
The first number you think of should be plenty.
Or if not a little bit more.
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 December 2003 19:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Race between client rules and BES server
That is exactly what I was looking
I'd like to know if anyone knows of a product that can export a public
folder calendar from Exchange 2000 as a web page, automatically at a
specified interval, that runs as a service. I have a school district that
has secretaries that update the school calendar that shows on the schools
web page.
May want to look at slipstick and see if anything fits the bill.
http://www.slipstick.com/calendar/olpubcal.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Public Folder Calendar
How do I allow Inbound SMTP traffic directed to an outside IP Address. In Exchange
5.5, it was done by adding the outside interface in the routing tab of the Internet
Mail Service Connection and then adding a SMTP address to the recipient with that
outside address as the domain.
Thanks,
Bob C.
Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2003 to access their mailbox on
Exchange 5.5 ?
i.e. can I interchange my outlook client between 2000 and 2003 to access my
own mailbox on Exchange 5.5 ?
Outlook will be installed on different workstations.
Cheers
Raji Arulambalam
Senior
Fuggetaboutmailboxbackup.
-Original Message-
From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Best backup software for Exchange
We are looking at Networker and NetBackup for
enterprise backup solutions. We would
You can, but you might find your rules acting funny if you use any of the
O2k3 rules...
I use OL2k3 most always, but I was recently relegated to dial-up on a
business trip and had to use Citrix instead where we have OL2k2 installed...
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam
Yes they can.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raji Arulambalam
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Hi
Can a user use both Outlook 2000 and Outlook 2003 to access their mailbox on
I have seen it screw up rules, and at times blow them completely out.
-Original Message-
From: Raji Arulambalam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Hi
Can a user use both
I had a blow out last night
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
I have seen it screw up rules, and at
Madre Del Dios!!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
I had a blow out last night
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Aye carumba!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ely, Don
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Outlook 2003 and Outlook 2000
Madre Del Dios!!
-Original Message-
From:
OK people, let me spell this out for you since you seem to be having a
brain seizure.
The subject Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 means that I am migrating a
client from GroupWise 6.5 to Exchange, specifically Exchange 2000. My
apologies, I thought that would be obvious given that this is an
Yer mah heeer...
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
OK people, let me spell this out for you since you seem to be having a brain
seizure.
The
So that would make you my comical and utterly inept sidekick?
Yer mah heeer...
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
OK people, let me
I can moonwalk.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
OK people, let me spell this out for you since you seem to be having a brain
seizure.
The
I give you one point for attention-to-detail, but none for originality.
If you had done that in Ada or COBOL, now THAT would have been funny.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original
I see dead people.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Sidekick? Nope, you're way outta my league bub. I like to hang with those
that contain more than two brain cells to rub together...
But please keep talking trash, it's not often we get to have a battle of
wits with an unarmed rock... :P
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler
starts doing the running man
You can't touch this!
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I can moonwalk.
-Original Message-
From: Greg
Didn't know I was talking trash. In terms of wits, you're the one that
couldn't figure out that Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 posted to an
EXCHANGE list means Migrating from GroupWise 6.5...TO EXCHANGE. I do not
need to talk trash, your posts speak for themselves.
Sidekick? Nope, you're way
Anything not from CA.
John Matteson
Geac Corporate ISS
(404) 239 - 2981
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tigue Williams
Posted At: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:42 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
OS and SP?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Didn't know I was talking trash. In terms of wits, you're the one that
couldn't figure out that
Funny you should say that. I love my CA Arcserve.
Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr.
Director of IT
Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C.
101 Eisenhower pky
Roseland NJ, 07068
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Matteson
Sent: Wednesday,
You are officially black listed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Mazzotta
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Best backup software for Exchange
Funny you should say that. I love my CA
I can hear the music from Rocky when Rocky enters the ring to do battle with
Apollo Creed
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Its more like Screech from Saved by the Bell VS Danny Partridge.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
I can hear the
What next? Fighting words will begin with, My Exchange server and kick
your Exchange server's a$$!?
What have we become?
Tomorrows news headline will read, When mail admins go bad.
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
Could be worse. It could be Mail Admins Go Wild!
-Original Message-
From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 5:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
What next? Fighting words will begin with, My Exchange server
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Didn't know I was talking trash. In terms of wits, you're the one that
couldn't figure out that Migrating from
David, if you used a Sendmail server (possibly problematic, as it would
add an extra layer in your mail delivery, you could write a very simple
procmail recipe to do this. Probably the simplest solution would be to
send [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and write in the first line
in the
EX55 environment...
Greetings,
Looking at some email headers on a message trying to determine where it was
hung up. Trying to reconcile different time zones. What time(s) does
outlook use as the Sent and Received times when it displays a message.
K
It uses the timezone that the PC claims to be in.
-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Kevin C. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 15:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Times...
EX55 environment...
Greetings,
Looking at some email headers on a
You might want to take a look at Commvault Galaxy:
Restores single messages. Finds lost message, note, contact and more on
key parameters via wildcards. Backs up and restores with single instance
store.
http://www.commvault.com/products.asp?pid=1
-Original Message-
From: Tigue
As you read the headers, you will see that each SMTP server that handled
the message puts its timestamp there. The timestamp is followed by a
number, for example (-0500) or (-0400) --- this number indicates what
timezone that particular SMTP server is in. For example (-0500) means
EST.
Turn on OPTION EXPLICIT :)
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
OK people, let me spell this out for you since you seem to be having a
brain
5.0 was not the beginning of beginnings. 4.0 ruled!
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL
Those are very powerful seven (your number--I haven't counted) ports.
You're pretty safe by allowing only SSL into OWA, enforcing a strong
password policy, and watching the traffic that passes through the firewall.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world
The user's password hasn't expired, has it?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Crista Murphy
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003
What are you expecting to see?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Lavoie
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:45 AM
To:
Practice your disaster recovery by restoring the entire system from the most
recent backup to a lab machine. Grant the snoop permissions to that mailbox
and invite him to come down to the lab to look at whatever he wants to see.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Please explan what you mean by cannot see.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:20 AM
Ruled what?
For those of you who haven't been around, Mr. Greg Deckler has repeatedly
broadcast his diatribes that those of us who are MVPs should be likened to
employees (his word) of Microsoft and anything we tell you should be
considered to be propaganda straight from Bill Gates. Well, my
Trouble you are not
A wise man you are
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Ruled what?
For those of you who haven't been around, Mr. Greg
I can confirm from experience that the higher client does not work. I had to
downgrade the client to get it to interact with the migration wizard (E2K3
version in my case).
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2003 10:03 a.m.
To:
Sorry to ask this question. But as I have learned in the past there is no
need to run Eseutil /d on the stores unless there are issues. I have an
Exchange admin who does this quarterly and I am gathering up information
to present my point.
On 5/5.5/2000 I have never run eseutil on the databases
This has been my experience as well with 6.x but I actually got things
working with 6.5 and the Exchange 2000 Migration Wizard. To be honest, I
am rather shocked and amazed. Everything in my experience and everything
that I have seen coming out of Microsoft contradicts this. More details to
follow
ESEUTIL /D only recovers unused disk space. If you don't have a lot of
white space in your store, and I mean a LOT, I would never run it.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
OK, I've only been onsight at the client for one day and this is my first
shot at migrating GroupWise 6.5 to Exchange 2000. I'm having some
different experiences with 6.5 than my experiences with other GW 6.x
migrations to Exchange and I'm having some different experiences than what
Microsoft
Yes, I have a fundamental, philosophical problem with the MVP program.
Regardless of any direct compensation in the form of nik naks, etc. the
bestowing of honorary titles is a perk and is more valuable to some than a
monetary reward. Hence, in my opinion, it is a conflict of interest and
not
93 matches
Mail list logo
