We use Legato here for backing up pretty much everything. It can be
infuriating when it doesn't work and their tech support is lousy. On the
other hand, if Legato says something is backed up, you can rest assured
you can recover it if need be.
Their BSM (business suite modules) for Exchange seem
Is anyone running outlook 2002 on NT4 terminal server? We are currently
piloting this and we are seeing terrible performance. With outlook 98,
we could easily run 80 users per box. With 2002, we see horrible
response problems even down to 35 users per box. It's almost as though
only one copy of
It's actually Good, Fast, Cheap, but you are close enough...
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Getting email addresses from Inbox
Most anything is possible so long as you
-
From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem
But it happens with external mail as well.
Our test systems have never shown this symptom.
Our production E2K system never
]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 11:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem
Then I'm not sure what you mean.
The only way SMTP gets into Kimball is via the checkpoint firewall, and it
is configured to send only to nts126 (the MSX5.5 IMS
this and escalating it when I still worked there. Was
told it's by design when SMTP mail is transferred within an organization.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header
Our E2K mailbox servers have recently developed a bad habit...
Many people here (myself included) create Outlook rules to move their
Internet email into a separate folder based on the SMTP headers. A couple of
days ago this stopped working. An quick examination of an incoming Internet
email's
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Weird SMTP header problem
Our E2K mailbox servers have recently developed a bad habit...
Many people here (myself included) create Outlook rules to move their
Internet email
Subject: RE: Weird SMTP header problem
That doesn't prove it to me.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent
This is the worst looking hat I've ever seen!
Oh! Looks good on you, though...
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins;amr-corp.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AutoDL
Kinda like the baby ruth in Caddyshack?
RFCs 821 and 822 (or the updated 2821 and 2822)
Read them.
Learn them.
Live them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rrivera;elnuevodia.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How did I receive this?
I just received an email
Is it just me, or does most of the links on the referenced page come up
Page not found.
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:mike.koch;ebgames.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AutoDL
Well, I found this so far:
The Ultimate Guide to
The link wraps.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002
5.5 E2K mailboxes
If you change that to a GC does it help/hurt?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
The first MSX5.5 server in site.
-Original Message-
From: Chris
I've got a Perl CGI program that lets users manage DLs they own (and have
permissions to). It's fairly simple, really, it just lets them add and
delete users from a DL, and change the OOF to sender flag as well.
It's yours if you want it...
For those that are wondering why, our user domain is in
Because our Internet hosting provider says they can't give us a setup where
we can make OWA2K work (at least in a supported configuration).
We are evaluating our options, and hope to have a solution for OWA2K over
the Internet in six months or so. Until then, we need to keep the existing
OWA 5.5,
We are hitting a stumbling block in our plans to retire our old MSX 5.5
servers. Due to various reasons, we need to use OWA 5.5 to access E2K
mailboxes for the next 6 months or so. Normally, we don't see any issues
(well, very few) using OWA 5.5 (SP4) to access E2K mailboxes. However, if
the OWA
Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:Ken.Cornetet;kimball.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
We are hitting a stumbling block in our plans to retire our old MSX
5.5 servers. Due to various reasons, we need to use OWA 5.5 to access
E2K mailboxes
Here's my take:
A quick peek a CDW shows SBS at $1277
http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.asp?EDC=274287. Microsoft is
offering a $500 rebate if you can read the SBS sales literature and answer
20 some-odd questions. That puts the price at $777.
I'm not familiar with the MCSP program, so I
The McDonalds coffee incident is typical of how the media grabs a story and
presents only the sensationalized aspect of it ( Insane law system gives
awards woman for being burned by hot coffee!).
There's quite a bit more to this story than what was ever presented.
Short version:
1. McDonalds
You know what they say: opinions are like, well never mind...
Personally, I think SBS is a fantastic product, provided you keep it's
limitations in mind up front. Yes, it would be a pain to upgrade, but my
guess is that the vast majority of SBS installations would never face that
task.
Most
Do E2K front-end servers have to be in the same domain as the back-end
servers? I've been through the FE/BE paper, but I don't see the answer...
Anyone running FE servers in a different domain than the BE? Problems?
Issues?
_
List
Not host it, but it can theoretically proxy the HTTP traffic to the Exchange
2000 server. I've never tried this - indeed, I've never used Apache's proxy
capabilities at all - so that's why I say theoretically.
You might even be able to use Apache to do the SSL encryption.
If you really don't
Naw, it's still there, you just can't backup Exchange directly - you have to
create a selection file for it.
The simplest way to see what you need is to run ntbackup, pick your Exchange
stores, then tell ntbackup to schedule the job instead of running it now.
Ntbackup will prompt you to save the
GCs doe not use 389. They use 3268
See
http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS2000/techinfo/reskit/en/Distrib/dsbc_nar_bsa
d.htm
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: LDAP Issues
Remember
It's free, but shipping and handling comes to about $30,000.
You have to sign up for X hours of consulting to get the product.
What you end up with is a proprietary database (that's going to be retired
soon) and a proprietary scripting engine. You have to write your own scripts
to sync to other
We are starting to move our MSX5.5 mailboxes to an E2K server. Oddly, we are
seeing eventlog warnings (not the old event 1016) whenever someone other
than the owner accesses the calendar of someone who's mailbox is on the E2K
server.
The eventlog entry claims the operation failed, but users are
Is there is a way to install the Exchange aware version of ADUC, but not the
rest of the Win2k adminpak or Exchange System Manager?
We are going to install ADUC on our help desk staff's computers, but we'd
prefer not to pollute their PCs with stuff they don't need.
nbtstat -a workstationname
Gives something like this (note IP address and MAC address):
E:\WINNTnbtstat -a nts51
\Device\NetBT_Tcpip_{EF089F68-2FA3-4D88-B995-489E72F64BBF}:
Node IpAddress: [0.0.0.0] Scope Id: []
Host not found.
Local Area Connection 2:
Node IpAddress: [167.178.70.30]
Here's the procedure for restoring Windows 2000 to different hardware that I
developed and tested fairly well. It was developed around Legato Networker,
but should work for any sort of backup/restore.
Windows 2000 Server Recovery to Different Hardware
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 This document describes
and email
rem * report
rem *
rem * Ken Cornetet - 06/10/2002
rem *
rem * Revision History
rem *
rem * WhenWhoWhat
rem * ---
rem * 06/10/2002 Ken Cornetet Original Issue
rem * 06/24/2002 Ken Cornetet Added RSM command per
Anyone seen this ADC error before?
Event Type: Warning
Event Source: MSADC
Event Category: Replication
Event ID: 8294
Date: 8/23/2002
Time: 9:49:24 AM
User: N/A
Computer: NTS336
Description:
The homeMTA attribute is not present on the import
If it's E2K, or if it's 5.5 and you have a two-way ADC with an AD domain, I
have some perl code that uses LDAP to manage DL (AD groups, really)
membership. Let me know if you'd like it...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29,
You've shown yours, now I'll show mine...
(Needs grep, recode, and blat)
rem *
rem *
rem * Perform fullback to whatever tape is in the drive and email
rem * report
rem *
rem * Ken Cornetet - 06/10/2002
rem *
rem * Revision History
There is already an excellent win32 port of the ntp daemon. See
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/ bottom left hand side of the page. I've been
using this for quite a bit to sync NT4 servers and workstations.
It probably would work on 2000 as well, but I just use the net /setsntp:
command for the DCs.
Has anyone on the list tried to use Apache or MS ISA server to proxy http
(and https) from a DMZ back into an E2K front end server? If so how did it
work out? Inquiring minds want to know!
_
List posting FAQ:
I recently wrote a perl program that takes an addusers export file and
populates it with passwords consisting of random characters. If you haven't
already created the user accounts, you can use my code along with
addusers.exe (NT4 resource kit, but works with AD too).
-Original Message-
I think this is the general route I'd take...
1. Buy new server
2. Install NT4 as a BDC of your current domain
3. Promote new server to PDC (which will simultaneously demote the old PDC).
4. Install win2k server on new server, converting domain to mixed mode AD
5. Install ADC, do forestprep and
There's another option that should work here: Microsoft ISA server in the
DMZ forwarding http and https to the internal Exchange server.
I've never tried this, but it was what our Microsoft tech guy recommended
for putting OWA2K on the Internet. If we can talk our Internet hosting
service into
On your E2K server, use Explorer to look at the M: drive [1]. The
subdirectory there reflects your default recipient policy SMTP address. To
use OWA, a user MUST have an SMTP address corresponding to this address.
For example, if your default recipient policy has an SMTP address of
We are running into some issues with our E2K migration plan.
We are creating an empty root NATIVE AD domain.
We are upgrading our NT4 master user domain to MIXED mode AD.
Original plan was to configure a DL connection agreement to create DLs as
universal security groups in the native AD domain,
I think you are on the right track. If you do anything different, add more
RAM.
BTW, With 3GB you will need to use the boot.ini switch /3GB, which requires
windows 2000 advance server. Otherwise, your apps (Exchange) will only get
2GB
See
Exchange 2000 Install
You don't need the /3GB if you aren't running advanced server. Normal server
will work fine with 3Gb.
But then you knew that :)
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 June 2002 15:15
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Exchange
...any
insight on the breakdown of storage groups (how many mailboxes per) etc.
thanks,
BOb C.
- Original Message -
From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:15 AM
Subject: RE: New Exchange 2000 Install
I think you
Do you have any unix/linux servers about? There is a free program out there
(name escapes me at the moment) that sends event log entries to syslog on a
unix box. On the unix side, it's pretty simple to configure syslog to send
email on receipt of given events.
If memory serves, there is also an
Unless things have changed, a C, or even (C) (which is very popular) is
NOT sufficient to explicitly show copyright. It has to be either the whole
word Copyright or the funky little c inside the circle, followed by the
year.
However, the Berne convention (to which the US signed up a few years
Boot from MSDOS floppy and do fdisk /mbr. That will re-write the master
boot record. However, I don't think that is your problem. The problem is
that the partition boot block (which is loaded by the MBR) can't find
ntloader.
If your system disk (which is the disk you boot from - as opposed to
We use NAV CE here (currently upgrading to 7.61) for workstation and server
protection. On the whole, I've been very impressed with the software. It has
caused zero compatibility problems (that I know of) on thousands of desktops
and hundreds of NT/2K servers. It also does not seem to sap
companies of any
software products recommended by this individual.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MacAfee or Symantec ?
We use NAV CE here (currently upgrading to 7.61
Subject: RE: MacAfee or Symantec ?
Ken...with the NAV Exch piece does it have the ability to say block LNK,
etc... at the IMC but let them thru for internal stuff.??
bill
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 1:12 PM
To: Exchange
You have turn on relaying, right?
-Original Message-
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: SMTP message
So yes all syntax is correct but I still get the undeliverable message.
-Original Message-
I'm testing our 5.5 - 2K migration plan in a test lab, and I've run into a
stumbling block. Q295922 says that ADC migrates 5.5 DLs to AD UDGs and that
the E2K store will convert these to USGs as needed. This is not what I'm
seeing, so obviously, I'm confused...
I have two AD domains: ADSTEST
Is your Windows 2000 domain in native mode?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002
My gut feel is that you'd have better luck promoting one of the BDCs to PDC
for backout.
-Original Message-
From: Martin, Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: NT to AD Backout Problem
More of an NT/AD than an Exchange
Is anyone on the list running E2K in a mixed mode AD domain? We are looking
at rolling out AD in mixed mode, and then migrating our MSX5.5 to E2K.
If I understand correctly, my MSX5.5 DLs will come across as Universal
Distribution groups as opposed to Universal Security groups. Since we don't
Yes good, but not Kevin Smith...
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Cerification question
Office Space
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
In OL98 the holidays.txt file only went up to just before Christmas 2000 (if
memory serves...)
Replace your holidays.txt with one from OL2K and then load holidays.
-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:00 AM
To: Exchange
If you are into Perl, I've got a script that I use to reboot our MSX55
servers (monthly for mailbox servers, twice monthly for IMS, weekly for
OWA). It could undoubtedly be tweaked for what you want.
It shuts down the MSX services before the reboot (and verifies that they do
indeed stop). After
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
But why are the reboots required?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
If you
, 2002 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
Sir,
How do you explain the folks who run this stuff everyday without any
(or little:-)) errors?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April
this stuff everyday without any
(or little:-)) errors?
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
Because ASP gets senile quickly. If we don't reboot
A small company (15 people) is asking me about installing Exchange. I've
been looking at Small Business Server and it looks almost too good to be
true. The obvious limitations (50 workstations, no trusts) are not a problem
for this company.
Am I missing something here? Has anyone had any
For each message you send, go to the send options and select binhex as
the method for sending attachments. Under OL98, it is File, Properties,
Send Options. I'm pretty sure it moved on OLXP so you'll have to hunt
around.
Really, can't this be added to the FAQ?
-Original Message-
From:
In their login scripts add lines like:
del %USERPROFILE%\local settings\file1
del %USERPROFILE%\local settings\file2
-Original Message-
From: Derrick Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic - Seeking
I'll have to agree. Up until fairly recently, whenever I called PSS, I got
the help I needed irregardless and the call would stay open until I was
happy. The last time I called, I was firmly told that once the problem
crossed from an E2K install issue to an AD issue, I'd have to open a new
call.
RFC822 and RFC823 (Or the RSV versions 2822 2823). Read them, learn them,
study them, love them, for they are the holy writ of the wise prophets who
bestowed upon the world the gift of Internet email (and in doing so, gives
us meaningful employment).
-Original Message-
From: James
Except that OL98 doesn't have the run rule now option. You need OL2K for
that.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT outlook ops
Create the rule and then check the tickbox at the
Corporation
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 5:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K OWA M: drive
I've got a question about Exchange 2k
Is there any way to export and import MSX 5.5 object permissions?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
In preparation for moving to E2K, we want to change all of our non-human
objects (shared mailboxes, conf rooms, etc.) so that they have their own NT
user ID.
I can export, create the NT4 user ID and re-import with the newly created ID
as the primary windows account, BUT I then need some way to
-
From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Export Import permissions?
Since I am the if its not a human, its a PF type of admin. Can I ask why
you are doing this?
-Original Message-
From: Ken
confused.
Your users need an SMTP address that matches that specified in the
default recipient policy. Period. M: drive will also reflect the
changes, but it's not the lead indicator.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Thursday, February 28
I've got a question about Exchange 2k. On my lab system where I'm testing
E2k, I initially could not get OWA to work. I then found that in order for
OWA to work, users must have an SMTP address corresponding to the
subdirectory name on the E2k server's M: drive.
After I added an E2K server to
I've got a question about Exchange 2k. On my lab system where I'm testing
E2k, I initially could not get OWA to work. I then found that in order for
OWA to work, users must have an SMTP address corresponding to the
subdirectory name on the E2k server's M: drive.
My MSX5.5 org and site are KIIX
containers )from a 5.5 server to a 2000 server ...
Thanks
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: last try? ex 5.5 ex 2k
No, but there does need to be a working[1] two-way trust
No, but there does need to be a working[1] two-way trust between your 5.5
domain and your Exchange domain. There also needs to be a 2-way connection
agreement between your 5.5 site and your AD.
[1] Verify that your trusts are working at the member servers. A poked trust
relationship gave me no
I see this about one out of every 50 times I start Outlook98. My desktop is
a 366MHz - the servers are quad 500Mhz machines, so it may not be related to
desktop/server speed ratio.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:24 AM
Wow! Deja Vu!
I just had *exactly* #1 and #2. Here's the fix:
1. Use the AD users and computers tool to move the mailboxes, not the E5.5
admin tool.
2. I stopped and restarted the World Wide Web Publishing service.
3. Ouch! I did not have this happen... Look in the event log and see if
EXIFS
First, your users need certificates. You can buy these, or you can roll your
own - read up on this.
Next, Have each user install their cert on their PC. The recipients' public
keys need to be somewhere where outlook can see them. You can set up an
Exchange KMS server and essentially put the
Nope, I got one too, and I didn't go to MEC2001. I was at 2000, though...
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
I did; I just assumed
I'm trying to set up E2k in a lab environment and have hit a snag.
I've got AD DNS up and running smooth (at least I think it is). ForestPrep
and DomainPrep ran without errors. I have an ADC CA replicating one MSX 5.5
server to AD. Replication works (objects created on the MSX 5.5 system show
]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Error installing E2K
I'm trying to set up E2k in a lab environment and have hit a snag.
I've got AD DNS up and running smooth (at least I think it is).
ForestPrep and DomainPrep ran without
I mean even more confused than normal...
I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my aforementioned
problem and ran across Q270143 which describes the limitations of running
exchange in mixed mode. The following is stated:
for example, all servers in the site must use a common
be running the same SA.
Walt
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: I'm confused now!
I mean even more confused than normal...
I've been searching Q articles trying to find a way to fix my
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I'm confused now!
My existing MSX 5.5 server is in an NT4 domain called EXCHANGEX. I'm
wanting to install an E2K server in kii.kimball.com (netbios name kii).
I want to join
I've set up a lab to test our AD migration plan, but I've ran into a problem
and was wondering if anyone out there knows the solution.
Short version:
How do you completely remove all information about a domain from AD if the
DC for that domain is not available?
Long version:
I created an AD
There are various tools available that boot an alternate OS from floppy (DOS
or Linux) and use some non-microsoft driver to allow write access to the
NTFS partition. These may work just fine, but for my tastes, I'd prefer not
to have anything other than NT twiddling bits on my NTFS partitions.
You can use the shutdown.exe program from the NT4 resource kit along with
the scheduling service.
I've got a perl program that I use to reboot servers. It takes a snapshot of
running services, reboots the machine, and verifies that all of the services
running prior to reboot are running after.
Having the mib isn't enough. You also need the MIB.BIN file and the
PERFMIB.INI files as well. And they are matched - they all must come from
the same build.
Enabling SNMP reading of perfmon variables (at least under NT4/MSX5.5) is an
ugly and somewhat convoluted process. I once tried to build a
You simply put your log files on a separate physical disk from the store.
-Original Message-
From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win2k backup and Exchange
As much as I appreciate multiple links
Didn't they do that to Jack Nicholson in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest?
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Some Problem Someplace, I think
Is one allowed to FDISK a user?
OK, OK, time for me to step in. 20 some odd years ago, I repaired TVs for
pocket money whilst in high school. In my junior senior year I took Radio
TV repair at vocational school (where they sent folks not deemed suitable
for college). After high school, I went on to earn a BS in electrical
Why would your wife's boyfriend object? :-)
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Format Preference
Personally I prefer to have Kelly dressed in her belly dancing outfit
Known (but apparently not documented well) bug in Checkpoint. It chokes
after so many bytes of RFC822 To: headers (and others?).
Supposedly fixed in CP4.1
-Original Message-
From: Paul Burton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Use SMTP to mail it in
If you are even a bit programming savvy, use Perl's text manipulation
features to slice dice the email files as desired, then use the Net::SMTP
module to send to the appropriate recipient.
You might be able to use NT's native batch file tools to do the text
manipulation
Hey, in the early 80's I wrote a mail system in FORTRAN on the HP/1000
series computers. It was fairly limited, but had a pretty slick user
interface (user name lookups based on soundex codes, check status of sent
mail, etc).
Then we bought a big HP unix mini (an 850 if memory serves) and we
We used to get this all the time, but it went away when we went to NT SP6a
and MSX SP4 (and a weekly reboot). You might try re-installing first NT
SP6a, then MSX SP4 just on the offhand chance something didn't get patched
right the first time around.
-Original Message-
From: Semiglia,
job to copy the hourly DHCP
backups that NT does off to another server. Feel free to use mine:
@echo off
rem
#
rem #
rem # Backup DHCP information on NTS57
rem #
rem # Ken Cornetet
rem #
rem # Revision History
rem
with 20-20 hindsight.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:52 AM
To: Exchange
Yeah, but is a 28MPH impact hard enough?
Ford's Lee Iacocca's $2000 limit for the Pinto caused at least 500 people
to burn to death needlessly.
See http://www.mojones.com/mother_jones/SO77/dowie.html for more
information.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
101 - 200 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
