I can think of at least 4 Notes Connector installs for customers that
I've done over the years, some of which have now been operational for
well over 3 years. One company had multiple divisions all running their
own mail system; they simply wanted a shared address book, hence the
connector
Hey, does this mean we will get a upgrade to our Compaq servers (a sticky
badge with Compaq/HP to over sticker the current badge ;-), well this
happened over here when ITV (television company) took over ON digital
(digital arial transmitter company).
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like
Thanks a lot for the replies. Anyway, I decided to remove the server from
behind the Proxy, and give it a public IP address. This way, I will not have
to worry about this issue anymore.
Best Regards
Nizar El-Assaad
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
in my case
1. 30 mins is the average. Sp4 is fastest to install (fr my experience).
2. apply first on a test lab/server. then restore to previous state.
simulate update and restore.
3. remember: backup before applying on prodn.
4. in case..., restore as mentioned by ms's whitepaper. I've always
Who knows.
It is a possibility though, and they said that the specific product lines /
branding hasn't been decided on.
My view is that the Compaq Proliant servers will become a sub-brand of the
HP brand (IF the merger happens), ie HP Compaq Proliant. As for the other
product lines like Alpha,
No, you can't
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: XCH 2000 OWA
Does anyone know if I can take a stand-alone IIS server and put XCH 2K
OWA
on it BUT connect to a XCH 5.5 backend?
TIA
You can delete the relevant service from Outlook, and allow users to run
only certain applications using Group Policy.
-Original Message-
From: James Casstevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Forcing users to use
You can use the ost2pst utility.
If you need it email me privately.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: orphaned .ost files
What utilitie or procedure can be used to extract
In mixed mode you could try to use ADC and SRS to create contacts.
A different workaround :setup LDAP service on the workstations to point
to the other forest.
-Original Message-
From: Bloom, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:15 PM
To: Exchange
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q283/2/38.asp
-Original Message-
From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MTA Problems with Exchange 5.5 sp4
Thank you Serdar for the reply, and yes
Thanks Kevin and Ed
I will try to convince them to move the actual domain to AD.
JF
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
What is the best way to make sure you can get data back?
Thanks
Adriaan Van Huissteden
Network Administrator
Connect Credit Union
Phone: (03) 6233 0660
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Hi JF - I do a lot of work with Exchange for small companies and find that
moving them onto W2K is generally a very simple operation as they usually
are set up as a single domain and don't use DNS. Thus the general procedure
is upgrade a DC to get AD, protect this with another DC, populate the
Before everyone else jumps on this. It's best to read the FAQ found at
the bottom of this message and search the archives for BACKUP as a
topic.
This message thread especially is asked at least twice a week, and trust
me, I haven't seen ANY change in the answers in the two years I've
followed
Is Arcserve and exchange a good choice?
Adriaan Van Huissteden
Network Administrator
Connect Credit Union
Phone: (03) 6233 0660
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Umattempt a restore on an offline server?
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange Backups?
What is the best way to make sure you can get data back?
Thanks
Exchange is a good choice,
Arcserve is a good choice if you don't care about your backups, or should I
say your restores???
Honestly Arcserve sucks.
PS.Adriaan have you visited the FAQ's yet? The link is at the bottom of
this email...
Matthew
Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 10:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Backups?
Before everyone else jumps on this. It's best to read the FAQ found at
the bottom of this message and search the
Has any one used this? Is it any good?
Thanks
Adriaan Van Huissteden
Network Administrator
Connect Credit Union
Phone: (03) 6233 0660
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
We have another office that we want to get up on exchange 5.5. We have a
single domain and a working Exchange 5.5 server locally here running on a
PDC with OWA installed. The office connects to the network via an ISDN line
that (recently at least) seems prone to downtime.
We have already
What about using ADSL?
-Original Message-
From: Bean, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 10:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Need advice adding a new server...
We have another office that we want to get up on exchange 5.5. We have a
single domain
Without speaking about your specific situation, yes OWA will work fine even
if one server is in a different site, you shouldn't need another IIS/OWA
server. Also, I'd investigate using an X400 connector instead of a site
connector.
Phil
My question is if we remove this server and create them
Do you mean OWA? If you do, yes, we use this, yes it's very good.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Internet access to Exchange Server
Has any one used this?
The correct answer would have being
Yes!, (and) Yes!!
Kuminda Chandimith
Sr. Technical Consultant
Ducont.com FZ-LLC
Tel: + 971-4-3913000 Ext 237
Fax: +971-4-3913001
http://www.ducont.com
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2001 16:42
Arcserve and anything is not a good choice.
Not true, Arcserve and a dumpster are a perfect fit...
Matthew
Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today!
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp
Besides the technical limitations on the
Try Q182112.
Matthew
Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today!
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp
Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P stands for
Personal, that means you're responsible not the mail admin)... Jim
1.Since 7/2001 on this site, since 10/2000 at our European hub site.
2.We merged with a company that has 130+ notes sites, we have about the same
amount of Exchange sites neither side could justify the cost to migrate,
yet...
3.None, it's just a connector of sorts. Just connects the NJ Exchange
How many people at this remote site, and how heavy do you expect the traffic
to be. I have three remote sites connected with point-to-point T-1's. They
each have an Exchange box hosting about 150 mailboxes, 25% to 30% of which
see moderate to heavy use. No separate Exchange site, no x-400
Kool-Aid anyone?
Andy David
J Muller International
-Original Message-
From: Karen Swart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Global signature
Does anyone know how (if possible) to add a global signature to appear
Karen,
Without trying to sound too rude, did you just join the list today? Did you
do any research into this question at all before posting it? This has been
asked (and answered) at least three times in the last week. There is a link
to the FAQ at the bottom of this (and every) message: please
does it still re-write the boot record of the hard disk?
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Never argue with an
It's the corrupt meeting that's causing the problem. All you have to do
is use OWA to access this person's calendar and delete the corrupt
calendar item.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vuyk, Wim
Sent: Monday, September 10,
its most likely a recurring meeting...
and q281935 points to a hotfix that you should install (post SP4) to prevent
it from happening again... this is the CDO 1.21 update
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 10:15 AM
To:
Hi
When i enable out of office assistant. only for users with in that
organisation are getting out of office reply , those mails which are sent
from other domains are not getting the out of office reply.
please help me in solving this issue
thanks in advance
A.U.Sankar
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Van Huissteden, Adriaan wrote:
Is Arcserve and exchange a good choice?
Arcserve and anything is not a good choice.
--
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or policy of
Hi there,
Thanks for replying.
I did not get to read the article you send yet. Thanks.
The actual problem was with NT Authentication. The user was not in the group
allowed to access it.
He is part of a separate company. We only host their servers and let them
use our Exchange Server.
Thank
Lawyers are never cheap, or easy.
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult
one. - Bruce Lee
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL
Hello All,
We, the core group of Rubi-con, are looking for a speaker to talk about
Exchange Administration and Security, as well as a few other topics. The
conference is April 5th-7th, 2002 in Detroit, Michigan. If you are
interested in speaking (or have questions), please e-mail me privately
Why do you want to send OOF messages to people in other domains? It's
annoying. Ed has a couple of things to say about it from a security
standpoint, too.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam:
my problem is say if you are sending mail to me, you won't get auto reply
from my mail box, but who ever sending mails to me with in my office will
get reply
i think u will be able to help me now.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh, I understood what you were saying. I want to know WHY you want to do
it? Read Mike's post.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
Yes but I would need to have a share on the Exchange server, accessible to
the IIS server...
There is no free lunch it seem!!! :o)
Seem that using a local smtp server on the IIS server will be the way to go.
-Message d'origine-
De: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: 7
I'm assuming that you might have gathered that I was being a complete
smart a$$ in my reply. ;o) I agree with your sentiments exactly.
D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel
Chenault
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 10:43 AM
To:
No, it was added after but I'm not sure that W002 was the first either. I
just know that it was there before W001 and it is the oldest server in the
site.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2001 18:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
The article is still thereIt is referenced in the renaming a domain
technet article.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 12:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE:
Hello all,
this is my frist posting here, so I hope I am at the right place. I'm
rather desparated! My colleques have programmed some very nice VBScripts
to administrate an Exchange 2000 environment. The only drawback is these
scripts run only at the server directly. From different informationen
Hi all,
I have Exchange srver 5.5 Sp4 on WINDOWSNT 4.0 (Back office 4.5), NOW we are
shifting the OS to Windows 2000 server and partitions will alsobe different.
what are the best way to take the backup.
*.edb and *.pat file i will take backup and what else I need to take care
Thanks
uk
Any firewalls between the user's workstation and the Exchange server (specifically
blocking UDP)? This can make it appear that mail is taking a long time to arrive,
when the culprit is the PIX preventing Exchange from updating the client view.
Eric
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:12:46 -0400,
I added the IP where it says Hosts and Clients with these IP addresses
I also have the Hosts and Clients that successfully authenticate enabled
Did you add the IP as allowed or restricted?
There is a whitepaper on MS' site on the IMS and relaying.
- Original Message -
From:
this is outlined in the FAQ pretty well
-Original Message-
From: kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: URGENT to Upgrade
Hi all,
I have Exchange srver 5.5 Sp4 on WINDOWSNT 4.0 (Back office 4.5), NOW we are
shifting
Exchange 5.5 SP4 Running OWA
OWA works fine if I log in via the Log On form. If I use the Public Access
hyperlink OWA opens an empty interface and pops up a dialog that says:
Unable to render folder. There are no published folders.
I have some public calendars but they must be published? Can
The easiest way would be to build a new server and follow FAQ Appendix A
,modifying it to meet the changes to Windows 2000.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
My interpretation of the announcements and/or conjecture is that the server
line would be HP ProLiant. But I am not speaking authoritatively here; I
don't really know any more about this merger than you do.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
Probably all you need to do is install the Exchange 2000 Administration
Tools on the Exchange 2000 Professional workstation or Exchange 2000 Server
on which you want to run the scripts.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are
Michael,
First, your English is much better than my German, and better than that of
70% of the mouth breathers produced by the American educational system.
As to your question, I'm not sure I have an answer directly, but I do have
an implementation methodology question. Is there a reason that
www.lostpassword.com
-Original Message-
From: Natacha Rivet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: PSTUPG19
One of our user have a password protect his pst and don't
remember it... If
somebody have this tool (or
Ask for your subscription fee back.
or reply to the OOFs with the instructions for doing the PF thing
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
Hello,
We ran Arcserve here for about 4 years until just recently. I stopped
upgrading after the Y2K patches for ArcserveIT. Updates just seemed to
provide less product functionality, and plunge you deeper into their milking
of the product.
Their default Raima database has problems if it
I average about three to four OOO replies everytime I post to this list.
Otherwise I don't see them.
John
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances
As long as we're
Already search and nothings...
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:31 PM
Subject: RE: PSTUPG19
Search google.com
You will find it
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
to see the password you need to have a valide license
.
- Original Message -
From: Scharff, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: PSTUPG19
www.lostpassword.com
-Original Message-
From:
Original sender...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances
As long as we're on the topic, I have a question. If I've subscribed my
Not everyone works for free.
Eric
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:40:30 -0400, Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
to see the password you need to have a valide license
.
- Original Message -
From: Scharff, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks !
On www.google.com only 1 hit - a reference to the product...
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: PSTUPG19
Not everyone works for free.
Eric
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001
We're running Exchange 5.5 SP4.
I have a problem with users from a certain domain not being able to
successfully send mail to us. The ISP is the same for both of us and mail
sent from this domain to us is forwarded by the ISP's Unix server running
sendmail. In fact all our incoming mail is
Sorry, I meant Deja.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Natacha Rivet
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: PSTUPG19
Already search and nothings...
- Original Message -
From: Martin
FYI, here's a link I trust a bit more than
earthlink.com/~some_guy/H4CKZ/
http://www.msexchange.org/how_to/passwords.htm
-Original Message-
From: Natacha Rivet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, September 10, 2001 01:49 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation:
It goes to the name in the FROM field.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Pinky, are you pondering what I'm
Have they sent you (via fax or snail mail) transcripts of their SMTP
sessions where your server allegedly returns an unknown user response? If
not, ask them to do so, then analyze it. Try it yourself to see, if you
have to.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new
What you need to do is to reinstall Exchange on the new W001 server, but
choose to create a new site. Make sure you name the site exactly identical
to the original site. Complete Exchange setup and disable the MTA on W001.
Bring it to the same Service Pack level as your last successful backup.
Steve Bryant wrote an article on just this. Check it out.
http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/stevebryant/bryant_c6p1.asp
Matthew
Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get yours today!
http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp
Besides the technical
Hi List,
Is there a way for users to access personal Distribution Lists from
their Contacts folder via OWA without me having to write extra code?
(Exchange 5.5 sp3, NT 4.0 sp6)
I can only find references to Ex2K when searching TechNet for OWA / XWEB
and DLs.
Thanks,
Will Grever
Exchange 2000 SP1, Windows 2000 SP2, GFI Mail Essentials 2000 (latest build), Dell
PowerEdge 2550, dual P-III 733, 2GB RAM.
Dear Exchange Gurus and Goddesses:
Q: Is there a way to get Exchange to limit the number of recipients per message for a
specific remote domain? More specifically,
When you are restoring 5.5 you need to do the install as if it is going
into a new site. Make sure you get the spelling of the old site and org
exact including capitalization. Then run your restore.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
I don't think there is any such creature.
Essentially you have 10% white space on your box. You are only going to
reclaim 2GB of space by doing it now. What does he intend to do with
this small amount of space?
If you wait 3 months, is going to be better or worse, or what will it
matter.
From my perspective, you're making this real hard.
Inform the students that they can use any mailbox they want, but as far as
the university is concerned official communications from staff and faculty
are delivered to their Exchange mailbox. It is the student's responsibility
to keep up with
There is no such Microsoft recommendation. The decision as to when to do an
offline defrag is purely the customer's decision.
- Original Message -
From: Derrick Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:23 PM
Subject: When
My apologies if this was recently asked.
I did not find it in the archives, and I've been out of town and did not
thoroughly scan the conversation topics of the last few days.
Will
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001
The South East Exchange Users Group (SEEUG) meeting will be held on 18
September starting at 6:00 P.M.
Guest Speaker: A technical team from IXOS Software.
Subject:Exchange Message Archiving (or, how to
control/reduce your space requirements without resorting to
Can anyone in your org address the All Students DL? If it's just for administrative
staff you could try training them to address this list in the BCC: field so the
address info would not be sent along with the message.
I agree with another post on this topic - I think you've gone too far to
I don't know of a set ratio that MS recommends, I do believe the feedback
that I remember seeing on this around here a while back was simply, why? I
can say the only time in 3 years that I have ran a defrag was after our
array went south, and that was only a matter of the DR procedures. Our DB
Derrick,
just mention in your next conversation, in your most somber engineer voice,
that the databases should be fluffy with white space rather than dense and
defragged. fluffy is the word you're looking for. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
If E-mail reliability (aka - uptime) is paramount, the case is almost made for you.
Do a simple cost/benefit analysis of taking the database off-line to defrag it.
Cost = Downtime of Exchange server
Benefit = 2Gb of additional free space (unless the server is low on space, benefit is
almost
Perhaps you could set each student up with an account on your mail server
and then document for them how to pop it off into Hotmail.
They'd still have to remember to click the Check other mail button (or
however hotmail does that), but they wouldn't have to sign on to a seperate
system.
Joel K.
Wooho!
-Original Message-
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: When Does Microsoft Recommend Defrag of Exchange IS?
Derrick,
I believe that the closest you will find a suggestion to be is
I'd think that the Hotmail User Groups scheme would only help if you could convince
everyone to send separate messages to each of the Hotmail groups.
The answer, as has been suggested below, is that hotmail users will have to get their
messages from a regular Exchange account. It doesn't have
BCC results in a separate message sent to each non-Exchange recipient. If a
single message were sent to all recipients at a domain, then each would know
about the others, defeating the purpose of BCC.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All
Then my comment isn't much help. I think I said that, no?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
At the risk of sounding stoopid (well, more stoopid) - this means that BCC'ing would
solve his problem, yes? Hotmail wouldn't reject the messages because they'd be
individually delivered. That's what I originally thought but my brain is working at
around 40% capacity after this weekend and I
It doesn't get sent to swynk.com - only the sender's E-mail address, so I don't think
this will do anything.
Eric
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:26:21 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time), Exchange Discussions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of the public folder thing, I specified not to send ooo to
But they don't go to swynk, they go to the user who sent the reply to a
thread to swynk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: O.O.O annoyances
Store will stop and not start again. You cannot ignore it.. You must
upgrade to enterprise to get past that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Laercio_SantosJr@Intervale
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
The standard has that limitation yes. (And prior to 5.5 , so did the
Enterprise version)
Don't ignore it.
-Original Message-
From: Laercio_SantosJr@Intervale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 7:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Information store limited
Yes, unless you want to do backups.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Van Huissteden,
Adriaan
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Arcserve and Exchange
Is Arcserve and exchange a good choice?
Exchange 5.5 SP4
I sent a meeting request to a user who works in a different company but using Exchange
as well. The user received the meeting request and opened it. It showed up just as a
plain text message. The user was not able to accept or reject it. I thought it was
something to do with
um.. i knew that.
1. Open mouth.
2. insert foot.
:whine
Using a public folder doesn't work for my situation, since i use pine.
:end
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Don Ely wrote:
But they don't go to swynk, they go to the user who sent the reply to a
thread to swynk.
-Original Message-
From:
Excellent approach Ed! For the past 2 months the white space has been in
the 2-2.5GB range. So, there's no real danger of space consumption. Unless
someone does find a TechNet article, I believe I now have plenty of
reasoning points. These list serves are useful. :-)
Thx All!
At 03:15 PM 9/10/2001 -0700, Ed Crowley wrote:
BCC results in a separate message sent to each non-Exchange recipient.
Actually, this appears to not be true.
Watching the mail come from our 5.5 IMS to our sendmail relay, only one
message comes out, with two different envelope recipients, same
Nice to see everyone still whining about out of office messages. I'll be
able to pick up right where I left off.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
So where ya been? Out OF the Office I'd guess... ;-)
At 06:33 PM 9/10/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Nice to see everyone still whining about out of office messages. I'll be
able to pick up right where I left off.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
