RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-25 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Thanks Tom That was doing one by one right? Not using exmerge. Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 September 2001 02:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Search the archives of this list, Ed Crowley a

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-25 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Sent: 25 September 2001 03:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate No, that was by selecting 850 mailboxes and moving them all. One by one? Heh. Someone's a glutton for punishment. > -Original Message----- > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PR

RE: outlook closed when moving mailboxes?

2001-09-26 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I think it is good practice to advise your end user about the move and hence this gives you the opportunity to ask him\her to close his\her outlook, "to prevent any loss of mail" is a smooth one to use...:-) Sander -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Se

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-26 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Thank you all for your response, I'll try the move mailbox. Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 September 2001 01:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate I agree with missy - Original Message - Fr

RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate

2001-09-26 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
-Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 08:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move Mailbox Transfer Rate Thank you all for your response, I'll try the move mailbox. Regards Sander -Original Message- From:

RE: How to add a Recipients Container

2001-09-27 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Bad plan, I used Address Book Views to separate users belonging to separate groups/towns/companies, worked like a dream. You can set their default view to their own group and they can go to GAL if they want to mail other users. Hope this make sense Sander -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: DOmain name and exchange

2001-09-27 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
How to make a new domain name? i.e. change your email domain or add another? Just accept mail on your IMC for that domain and make sure you have the corresponding MX record in your DNS Sander -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 September 2001 02:

RE: DOmain name and exchange

2001-09-27 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
it again. But After almost 24 hours of setting up the DNS I still cant recieve. Any Ideas anyone. Thanks Rich -Original Message----- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOmain name and exchange

RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K

2001-10-01 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Well with a general question like that, what did you expect? A yes/no poll? A washing list of problems that can/could occur? I wouldn't honestly know what to answer this fella. Sander -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2001 02:26 To: Excha

RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K

2001-10-01 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 Cell: 817-999-7703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 7:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K Well with a general question like

RE: IMC and DNS for outbound mail

2001-10-01 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I would suggest you use your ISP's SMTP as a smart host, remenber you are on dial-up (usually slower than LAN) so why try handle the additional resolving/retrying if your ISP can handle this for you. I set all my dial-up mail servers to do this. Sander -Original Message- From: Nizar El-

RE: HOW Outlook connects to Exchange

2001-10-04 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
How did you remove it? It looks to me that AD/GC still has a record of that server as an exchange server. Only when you get no response ( ie time lag on client side) from that server does it appear to go to the other server. I know you can fiddle a bit with your GC's to point it to preferred serve

RE: AV! a full time job?

2001-12-27 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Ya forgot to salute!! And stand on attention when ya speak to us...:-) -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: AV! a full time job? Motivated, Dedicated and True to the Anti-Virus R

RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question

2002-01-04 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
LOL! Spot on there ...:-) Oh no, spot is a dog (or troll in Richard's case) -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Was: Question from a troll to a Yoda - Now: RFC Question Someone expl

RE: changing port

2002-01-06 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Just a quick question Martin, why do you have MX 20 Exchange ? If Exchange listens on port 97 nobody is going to find it anyway (on port 25) if MX 10 goes down, or am I missing something really obvious here...:-) Sander -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: changing port

2002-01-08 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
's example, Exchange listens on port 25, Mailmarshall is installed on a separate box. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -Original Message- > Fro

RE: Ek2 SDK, client Meeting Auto accept

2002-01-10 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I think you should have a look at www.cdolive.com , they have sample codes (for those of us who aren't brilliant coders...:-) to do a lot of custom things on Exchange. Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Morten B. Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:4

RE: Problem with installation..

2002-01-10 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Have you checked what your logon credentials are? You (your logon account) need to be part of Schema Admins to make updates to the Active Directory Schema. Sander -Original Message- From: Dragan Debeljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Disc

RE: Auto BCC

2002-01-11 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Ed has this saying about fixing bad behaviour with technology. Check with HR first if this is acceptable company policy. You would probably have to script something to run on each each users computer to fill in that specific email address in the bcc field. Hell no, brrr don't go this way. Sander

RE: Better Version

2001-10-17 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
onstituent requirements (RG, CA, SG, ADC, MMC..hey wherez Admin?). The daunting reality of incorporating an moving to a new OS along with a new email server software gives some pause and reconsider the value-add that is compelling it. And rightfully so, I think. Tim. -Original Message- Fr

RE: Better Version

2001-10-18 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
email server software gives some pause and reconsider the value-add that is compelling it. And rightfully so, I think. Tim. -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 3:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Better

RE: Exchange clustering

2001-10-24 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Hi Joe Try this link for some info on Exchange 2000 Clusters. http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/SG246265.html Hope this helps Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Joe D. Llewelyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: NDR/Relaying behaviour

2001-10-24 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Is the @customerdomain your inbound one? If so, than the behavior seems correct to me as you are not relaying. You were authenticated as an user. Sander -Original Message- From: David Grimstone (DSLWN) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discu

RE: Problems sending mail

2001-10-25 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Hi Anthony Have a look at Q289553 re the second type of NDR. I looks to me you may need to look your SMTP connectors, you appear to be relaying/using a smart host that doesn't seem to work correctly. Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Attachments

2001-11-08 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
t everyone instead of the culprits. Hence why i asked if he had checked the individual mailbox settings instead. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Computer Support Analyst Network Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message----- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: Preferred setup of Exchange?

2001-11-08 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I use my Firewall as a smart host, my MX points there as well. My Firewall rules take care of the rest. My understanding of a DMZ is that no machine in it can initiate a connection, so I than fail to understand how a multihomed server in the DMZ is going to help you at all. I further believe you

RE: OWA in forgien country

2001-11-13 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Nice signaturethat Spanish too? -Original Message- From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: QA: OWA in forgien country I thought it was interesting as well, that at various places once signed

RE: FED UP!!!

2001-11-19 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Hi Andrey I had the same experience as you, my "original" white paper also said remove all. I have no experience with POP3 in the hosting environment, because we use Citix to deliver Outlook, so no POP3 is allowed ...:-)One less worry! Have you added any Distribution lists for each company? This

RE: Mirroring Exchange server

2001-11-19 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Hey! Plse don't start with the "finger-in-the-dyke" story:-) Sander -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 9:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mirroring Exchange server A Netherlands-based solution? William

RE: Mirroring Exchange server

2001-11-20 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
r happened ;) Martin 'who lives a few feet below sealevel also' Tuip Exchange 2000 list owner www.exchange-mail.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:16 AM To: Exchange Dis

RE: Mirroring Exchange server

2001-11-20 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
tell us that Dumbo wasnt real either! -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mirroring Exchange server Ja! Goede man die Walt Disney :-) -Original Message- From: M

RE: Mirroring Exchange server

2001-11-20 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
uestion by asking if there was "a simple low co(a)st . . ." I think the odds are more like 100:1 that this is one of those instances. Craig -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:16 PM To: Exchange Discussion

RE: Outlook Problem

2002-01-16 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Does the non-working Exchange server have a lmhost file with an old setting of sorts? I would check if that server can "see" the domain controller(s). Wins/DNS settings all ok and working? Sander -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 1

RE: 70-224 Study Materials

2002-01-21 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
That is why it looks so silly when a person puts the alphabet soup (esp. MCSE) after his/her name and asks the group why you need an MX record, why Exchange 5.5 Admin will not run on his Windows 98 workstation and my personal favorite, can I delete all these funny log files that take up so much sp

RE: CC:

2002-01-23 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
In Exchange 2000 you can limit the number of recipients on the Properties/Messages page of your virtual SMTP connector. That would mean the total number of recipients per message, not per TO: and per CC: Sander -Original Message- From: Irfan Malik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursd

RE: ports

2002-01-29 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
netbios-ns 137/tcpnbname #NETBIOS Name Service netbios-ns 137/udpnbname #NETBIOS Name Service 137/UDP -- NetBIOS Name Server The network basic input/output system (NetBIOS) Name Server (NBNS) protocol, which is part of the NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NetBT) family of protocols, prov

RE: DSAdiag

2002-01-29 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I got it from our TAM a while back when I was looking for it, so I presume you would contact your local PPS and they will post it to you. All documentation points to the resource kit for Exchange 2000, but I have never been able to find it in there-( Sander -Original Message- From:

RE: exchange digest: March 07, 2002

2002-03-11 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
LOL! (s'pose that means I'm in, otherwise I would be out, right?) Sander -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange digest: March 07, 2002 I'll be IN the office all next week, 'coz

RE: An Active/Active cluster installation of exchange

2002-03-11 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
fixes. Regards Sander Van Butzelaar, MCSA MCSE Administrator KORBI.NET http://www.korbi.net "Never let a human do the work of a machine" - The Matrix -Original Message- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Exchange 5.5 -> 2000 Upgrade grief

2002-03-13 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Ah Barry, but a little bit further it says: "Do not withhold good from those to whom it is due, when it is in your power to do so." Proverbs 3:27 So let the man have his messages, I think they are good:-) Sander -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Se

RE: Exchange getting bounced

2002-03-15 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
So what happens to the new emails when the real server is down, does the test server except them? This would result in a loss of emails when the real server comes back onb I agree with Louis here, get the test server on a different physical network. Sander -Original Message- From

RE: Auto Responder

2002-03-15 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Yep, make the original incoming address a D/L and one recipient of the D/L is a contact (you guessed itit, it will be the email address of your mdeamon, so it will get a copy of the incoming email) Have fun Sander Van Butzelaar, MCSA MCSE Administrator KORBI.NET http://www.korbi.net "Neve

RE: Auto Responder

2002-03-15 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
t presence). I want that my exchange 2000 server forward it locally, Is their a way to that. Regards, -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Auto Responder Yep

RE: Auto Responder

2002-03-15 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
-Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Auto Responder They only way Exchange is going to forward anything is through SMTP. So what do you mean by locally? You do not n

RE: Why?

2002-04-01 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Human Electric? Cool, so the Matrix is true! Humans running on electricity sorry got carried away here. So what was the question again? Sander -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Adebayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: Database and Drives size

2002-04-11 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Will depend on your local environment. Possible - yes. Acceptable - depends. I prefer a Raid set up, but again for 5 users IDE will do etc etc. Sander -Original Message- From: wade robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2002 01:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Database

RE: best practice

2002-04-18 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I like keeping Exchange logs at least until I run a full backup ...:-) Sander -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 April 2002 09:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: best practice Hi, looking for some advice on what to do with exchange logs,

WORM_KLEZ.G Sever Impact

2002-04-23 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Hi All This virus, although being detected and stripped off, still causes an enormous amount of email traffic. I currently receive about 50 to 60 warnings per hour. Is there anything one can do proactively here, no, I don't mean pull out the network cable:-) or should I just sit out the stor

RE: iis 5

2002-04-24 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
May they need to be paid? -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 April 2002 03:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: iis 5 upgrade isp services.. is there a wizard for that ? :-} -Original Message- From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: any news on sp3?

2002-04-29 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Without sounding too nasty:"Why do people care when it comes out? Unless you have a serious problem and than you should talk to PPS anyway" . Sander -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 April 2002 09:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: any news on

RE: any news on sp3?

2002-04-30 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
7;. We want the biggest car, fastest computer and the newest service packs. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: "Sander Van Butzelaar" <[EMA

RE: any news on sp3?

2002-05-02 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
September... any takers yes, no...Sold to the gent with the funny hat...Oh, sorry mam... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 02:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: any news on sp3? July -Original Message- From: Stephen Mynh

RE: SMTP retry queues

2002-10-16 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Waiting for a time out perhaps? Sander -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 October 2002 03:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP retry queues Hey all. I am looking for someone who is smarter than me :) to explain to me why Exchange 2000 is k

RE: RBL's

2002-10-23 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
May I recommend the following literature by Dale Carnegie..:-) http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0671723650/qid=1035442040/ sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-6532048-4852914?v=glance (Link wraps) Cheers Sander -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net]

RE: RBL's

2002-10-24 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
al Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's May I recommend the following literature by Dale Carnegie..:-) http://www.amazon.com

RE: Permissions

2002-10-25 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
What exactly do you mean by "edit containers" and what version of Exchange are you running. Regards Sander -Original Message- From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM@;trencor.net] Sent: 25 October 2002 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permissions Hi there all, Is there a way

RE: Permissions

2002-10-25 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
ainer Regards, Carlos Magalhaes -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:sander@;korbi.net] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permissions What exactly do you mean by "edit containers" and what version of E

RE: Permissions

2002-10-25 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
this permission and application. Don't you agree? Thanks for info and tips though I will use them! Regards, Carlos Magalhaes -Original Message----- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:sander@;korbi.net] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: P

RE: Quick SMTP cluster question

2002-11-06 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Logic would dictate that it can, otherwise you would need a dedicated server for that only. That sounds silly. I have however not tested this in real life. Sander -Original Message- From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:jwkelley@;qualcomm.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 05:46 To: Exchange Discussion

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their mailbox sizes. So they "move" to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure. Sander -Original

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-06 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
#x27; policy. I don't back up PSTs. Period. Either its in their mailbox or it is not that important. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49 To: Exchange Discu

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-07 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
@;entrysecurity.com] > Sent: 06 November 2002 13:01 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' > > > I do. They don't know they can save them up on their home > folder. They know I don't back up the workstations, but most >

RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'

2002-11-07 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I do. They don't know they can save them up on their home folder. They know I don't back up the workstations, but most think that you only can save PSTs on local drives ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai

RE: somewhat OT

2002-11-07 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
We are, we cover South Africa and some sub-Sahara African countries. You don't want to know how many people they stick on a 64 k line on this continent...:-) Bandwidth, oh bandwidth where art thou... Sander Korbi.net -Original Message- From: Henley, John K (Johnny), METRO [mailto:jkhenley

RE: Suppressing the "envelope"

2002-11-08 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Is it just the mail notifications that come via UDP? What about calendar reminders? Just curious. Sander -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: 08 November 2002 02:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Suppressing the "envelope" You know,

RE: DHCP Server on Exchange Server

2002-12-03 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I doubt you'll even see the impact at all. No problem with it. For an ASP customer I need to run Exchange 2000 and SQL 200 on one box, now that is a baddie. Those two apps both like mucho resources. Not impossible, but not first prise either. Cheers Sander -Original Message- From: Chris

OT: The lights went out..

2002-12-03 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Morning all Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just had a full eclipse and it went pitch black. Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: ht

RE: The lights went out..

2002-12-03 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
ssage- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Morning all Weird feeling went the sun disappears for a couple of minutes...we just had a full eclipse and it went pitch black. S

RE: The lights went out..

2002-12-03 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
menal experience to be treasured and respected. The real thing, that is. Exchange is still humming along, I bet... William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:46 PM To: Exchange Discus

RE: Odd ScanMail behaviour

2002-12-04 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Haven't seen that behaviour before. The functionality definitely works as we use it (mail to admin, sender and receiver). Maybe try re-installing Scanmail. Your service packs up-to-date? No other problems with mail going out, ie also getting stuck in the outbox? Sander -Original Message-

RE: Haiku Friday

2002-12-04 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Well yes, after that Australian disaster with sheep Sheila ...oh aussies originally also came from England -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2002 07:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Haiku Friday Yep leave it to the British to fi

RE: Very OT - txt handling

2002-12-11 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
"I came across your address on the net"??? Are you in sales or what? You either subscribe to this list or you don't. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 December 2002 02:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Very OT - txt handling Hi there, I came

RE: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.5, deleted item retention=0

2002-12-18 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
My vote goes with toast then..:-(. I know of no quick recovery if all those avenues have been tried without success. Sander -Original Message- From: Jan Novák [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December 2002 12:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: recover deleted mail items Exchange 5.

STM Question

2002-05-23 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Morning Admins I have appear to have lost (gone, no trace) a stm file for one of my Mailbox Stores. Needless to say, the Mailbox store does not mount, nor can I restore my backup bkf file as I get an error: Information Store (2264) Database recovery/restore failed with unexpected error -1811. I

RE: STM Question

2002-05-23 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Eseutil /p "databasename.edb" /createstm -Original Message----- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:06 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: STM Question Subject: STM Question

RE: STM Question

2002-05-23 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
here. Tks Sander -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 May 2002 03:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STM Question Did you lose any mail? -Original Message----- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 20

RE: STM Question

2002-05-23 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
been opened by a MAPI client would have been in the STM and not in the EDB as well. Mark > -Original Message- > From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 23 May 2002 14:28 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: STM Question > > > Not that

RE: Where is everyone?

2002-06-03 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Cape Town - South Africa, here the leased lines change into jungle beat concerts once you are outside the city. One bang is a 0 and two bangs a 1. You need a keen ear and a fast hand to type. Sander -Original Message- From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 June 2002 0

RE: Where is everyone?

2002-06-05 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Stuur drop asb!...:-) Sander - Kaapstad -Original Message- From: Willigen, Maarten van [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 June 2002 12:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I am in Amsterdam Holland Maarten -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:

RE: Exchange engineer needed!!!

2002-06-14 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
How much you are needed? How much work you really need to do or how many $$$'s they think you are worth:-) Sander -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 June 2002 09:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange engineer needed!!! how much?

Reported emails not available after STM recreation and EDB corruption

2002-06-26 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Good morning all Exchange 2000 SP1. I had a corruption on one of my EDB files and had to recreate the STM file. At the time it looked like no mail was lost, but alas, this was not true. Outlook now still reports mail items that can't be opened. Error: "Can not open this item" Checked Event logs -

RE: Reported emails not available after STM recreation and EDB corruption

2002-06-26 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
ix logical corruption. Run it until you get 0 errors, 0 warnings, and 0 fixes or the same results twice. Isinteg -s -fix -test alltests Jeff Beckham -Original Message----- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:49 AM Posted To: Exchange

RE: Reported emails not available after STM recreation and EDBcorruption

2002-06-27 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
ed Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reported emails not available after STM recreation and EDB corruption Good morning all Exchange 2000 SP

Usefull OOF !

2002-06-27 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
How nice, messaging support according to this OOF from Colin Camilleri. I hope Alan knows what's coming his way!...:-) "Hi, I am no longer working for HP. Please contact Alan Fraser for any Mail and Messaging issues. thanks and regards, Colin" __

RE: Fix reverse DNS (?)

2002-07-01 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Make sure you have a ptr record for your mail server in your DNS. Sander -Original Message- From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 July 2002 08:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fix reverse DNS (?) Dear All, Some of our customers do receive the following NDR when

RE: Public Folder Alerts

2003-06-03 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Nothing may have changed on your administrative side, but something surely changed on your user's side. Two people are editing the same items on your server. Same job roles perhaps? New person taking over a function from another person? I've seen this happen in a hand over period. Sander -Ori

RE: RUS

2003-06-09 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Both your DCs are GCs. Good for exchange but one of the FSMO roles (the Infrastructure Master) does not want to be on a GC. It doesn't update if it is run on a GC. Not sure if this applies in a single domain too. Q1971322: NOTE: The Infrastructure Master (IM) role should be held by a domain cont

RE: Change FQDN in Ex55

2003-06-09 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Do you want to have both .com and .loc as an email address, or only .loc? One way would be with a smart host that could rewrite your .loc to .com on outgoing mail. Sander -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 02:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions

Mailtraq question

2003-07-08 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
real life experience with this product? Any views? There doesn't appear to be much info on the actual inner workings of the product, nor any disaster recovery. Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager

RE: Originator

2003-07-15 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Originator <> means it's an NDR. Are you seeing a lot of activity? Mail relay? Virus spoofing attack perhaps? Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 July 2003 03:41 PM To: Exchange

RE: Originator

2003-07-15 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I wouldn't worry too much about it, unless volumes increase to thousands per day:-) You should get copies of mail delivery attempts in your administrator box. You can see which users don't or no longer exist on your system. Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadm

RE: Exchange upgrade

2003-07-31 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
many users and how much mail and public folders are you talking about? Regards, Sander Van Butzelaar MCSA, MCSE Sysadmin Manager Korbi.net -Original Message- From: David Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 July 2003 01:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange upgrad

RE: Exchange upgrade

2003-07-31 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
We may migrate to Exchange 2000 in timebut not at the moment due to costs. I only have a single PDC, and 10 clients. Stores are approx Pub.edb = 4Gb Priv.edb = 8Gb Thnx again David > -- > From: Sander Van Butzelaar[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply To: Exc

RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000

2003-08-06 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I also get way more then a Gig a minute when I backup using a custom script pointing to Dev0, restores are a bit of a problem though Sander -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 August 2003 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup Softwar

RE: Information Store Size Question

2003-11-11 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
You are looking in Explorer at your priv.edb with exchange running or stopped? Stop exchange and see the real file size. Sander -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 November 2003 08:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Information Store Size Questio

RE: Information Store Size Question

2003-11-11 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Information Store Size Question You are looking in Explorer at your priv.edb with exchange running or stopped? Stop exchange and see the real file

New Virus received in Details.zip

2003-11-27 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Hi All Just a heads up about a new virus (or possibly a variation of an existing one) we received. The virus executed when a user unzipped the the details.zip file. Furthermore there was a text file with what looks like a random letter generated name. We scan zip files, but nothing was picked up.

RE: New Virus received in Details.zip

2003-11-27 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Morning All The nasty fella is called: Worm_YAHA.AF and you need Trends pattern file 691 to pick it up. Enjoy your weekend. Sander -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: 27 November 2003 01:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New Virus received in Details.zip Hi

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

2003-12-11 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
Sorry, all out. I have one hallelujah left though ...:-) It's nearly Christmas! Sander -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 December 2003 03:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Can I get an "Amen"! Eric Fretz L-3

RE: Installing Service Pack 4

2003-01-21 Thread Sander Van Butzelaar
I have an idea it was the antivirus software that wasn't stopped while putting on SP4 that caused the failure in the first place (although he doesn't state that there was AV on before) Just a hunch ..:-) Sander -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 2

  1   2   >