At 17.47 19/10/2003, you wrote:
ftp://ftp.surfnet.nl/vol/1/mandrake-mandrake/9.2/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/kernel-source-2.4.22-10.mdk.i586.rpm
is what you're looking for (IIRC this was about kernel sources wasn't it?).
It's about 40Mb big which is a lot less to download than a complete iso image.
But
At 17.32 19/10/2003, you wrote:
There's nothing wrong with waiting a little bit but, since you would have
to have the 9.2 tree downloaded to make the isos, have you considered
doing an hd install from the tree?
Probably I will download the full tree (could someone tell me in advance
how much
At 04.33 20/10/2003, you wrote:
I did have dependency problems, but the CDs were made and boot and
install. It looks like most of the dependency issues were with apache2
(which I'm not running, anyway).
I need to know how to solve the dependency problems. I suppose Mandrakesoft
solved them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
October 24, 2003 03:05 am, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
At 17.32 19/10/2003, you wrote:
There's nothing wrong with waiting a little bit but, since you would have
to have the 9.2 tree downloaded to make the isos, have you considered
doing an hd install
isn't not supplying the
kernel source technically a violation of GPL?
It probably was not intentional.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Dave Seff schrieb am Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:10:49 -0400:
isn't not supplying the
kernel source technically a violation of GPL?
It probably was not intentional.
It is intentional and it is not a violation of the GPL. Period.
Time to move on.
wobo
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
You'll want to look at the urpmi --parallel switch. It's more fully
explianed in the urpmi HOWTO at http://www.urpmi.org.
The links returned a '404 - File Not Found' message. Anyplace else this could
be hosted?
Kat
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
On Sunday 19 Oct 2003 4:13 pm, kat wrote:
You'll want to look at the urpmi --parallel switch. It's more
fully explianed in the urpmi HOWTO at http://www.urpmi.org.
The links returned a '404 - File Not Found' message. Anyplace else
this could be hosted?
Kat
It might be worth trying
You'll want to look at the urpmi --parallel switch. It's more
fully explianed in the urpmi HOWTO at http://www.urpmi.org.
The links returned a '404 - File Not Found' message. Anyplace else
this could be hosted?
Kat
It might be worth trying again, Kat. It is working from here
At 00.02 19/10/2003, you wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:27, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
Ok, but I have to wait until 9.2 will be available for everyone.
Olaf
It already is and has been all along..check the mirrors. It's only the
9.2
iso's that aren't available allover (yet).
But I don't
Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
At 00.02 19/10/2003, you wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:27, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
Ok, but I have to wait until 9.2 will be available for everyone.
Olaf
It already is and has been all along..check the mirrors. It's only
the 9.2
iso's that aren't available
On Sunday 19 October 2003 17:23, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
At 00.02 19/10/2003, you wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:27, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
Ok, but I have to wait until 9.2 will be available for everyone.
Olaf
It already is and has been all along..check the mirrors. It's only
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, kat wrote:
The first few links work but when I go to the individual tools, such as
'urpmi,' the '404' message comes up.
Yes, it appears that the HOWTO links no longer work, as the tiscali.co.uk
site that held those pages is no longer valid; however, you can view the
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 08:44, kat wrote:
You'll want to look at the urpmi --parallel switch. It's more
fully explianed in the urpmi HOWTO at http://www.urpmi.org.
The links returned a '404 - File Not Found' message. Anyplace else
this could be hosted?
Kat
It might be
Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
At 00.02 19/10/2003, you wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:27, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
Ok, but I have to wait until 9.2 will be available for everyone.
Olaf
It already is and has been all along..check the mirrors. It's
only the 9.2
iso's that aren't available
On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 14:07, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2003 11:21 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2003 10:44 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
At 18.08 17/10/2003, you wrote:
and looking at 9.1 Prosuite Edition CDs+DVD ONLY,
they came with 8CD + 1DVD...
the same for 9.2 is 9 + 1DVD,
so that's 700MB of extra stuff between 9.1 and 9.2
ok, ok, you are right...
but if you can't download the extra stuff over your modem,
you could of course
On Saturday 18 Oct 2003 10:55 am, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
At 18.08 17/10/2003, you wrote:
and looking at 9.1 Prosuite Edition CDs+DVD ONLY,
they came with 8CD + 1DVD...
the same for 9.2 is 9 + 1DVD,
so that's 700MB of extra stuff between 9.1 and 9.2
ok, ok, you are right...
but if you
On Saturday 18 October 2003 05:55 am, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
I think that Mandrakesoft should explain somewhere how to build a forth
install CD: having the RPMs burned in a CD or having them in a CD added to
the urpmi (+GUI) sources is different... And to add the CD to the sources
there must
At 12.36 18/10/2003, you wrote:
Which is where the TWiki comes in. Why not write up how you did it
and make it available for everyone else?
But I didn't (yet): I'm not a club member and I son't have 9.2.
Furthermore, Steven explained me how to do, you should have received his
post as well.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Oct 2003 at 20:59, James Sparenberg wrote:
No, the violation would be if it wasn't available at all. Since it is
available via urpmi and or the web.
I couldn't find anything about obtaining the kernel sources for 9.2 in the
wiki. Perhaps
On Saturday 18 Oct 2003 12:14 pm, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
At 12.36 18/10/2003, you wrote:
Which is where the TWiki comes in. Why not write up how you did
it and make it available for everyone else?
But I didn't (yet): I'm not a club member and I son't have 9.2.
Furthermore, Steven explained
On Saturday 18 October 2003 13:48, Greg Meyer wrote:
Download the rpms you want from the mirrors, burn them to cd, then add cd
as urpmi source.
Which still calls for a hdlist.cz describing the packages on that CD. It will
not be accepted without!
Good luck,
HarM
--
Registered Linux User
It was mentioned in this thread that all of the Mandrake Packs will come
with the nVidia drivers. Anybody care to pass them along to the rest of
us? Or do I have to wait until Nvidia gets them onto their site?
- Theo
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 18 Oct 2003 12:14 pm, Olaf Marzocchi
H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 13:48, Greg Meyer wrote:
Download the rpms you want from the mirrors, burn them to cd, then add cd
as urpmi source.
Which still calls for a hdlist.cz describing the packages on that CD. It will
not be accepted without!
Good luck,
HarM
You can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
October 18, 2003 02:30 pm, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 13:48, Greg Meyer wrote:
Download the rpms you want from the mirrors, burn them to cd, then add cd
as urpmi source.
Which still calls for a hdlist.cz describing the
At 20.44 18/10/2003, you wrote:
2) Open Source is about sharing responsibility and labour. It is not
for me to learn in depth about a problem that you are solving in
order for me to write an article. I am asking you to pay back the
help you receive by helping someone else.
Ok, but I have to
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 16:31:03 -0400
Theo Brinkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was mentioned in this thread that all of the Mandrake Packs will come
with the nVidia drivers. Anybody care to pass them along to the rest of
us? Or do I have to wait until Nvidia gets them onto their site?
On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:46, Charlie M. wrote:
Are you sure about that HarM?
If you don't download all the rpm's in that directory, then the hdlist.cz will
not be valid anymoreyou'll have to generate a new one with the right
packages using the -f option.
If the gui does that by
On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 13:30, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 13:48, Greg Meyer wrote:
Download the rpms you want from the mirrors, burn them to cd, then add cd
as urpmi source.
Which still calls for a hdlist.cz describing the packages on that CD. It will
not be accepted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
October 18, 2003 03:16 pm, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:46, Charlie M. wrote:
Are you sure about that HarM?
If you don't download all the rpm's in that directory, then the hdlist.cz
will not be valid anymoreyou'll have
On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 13:30, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 13:48, Greg Meyer wrote:
Download the rpms you want from the mirrors, burn them to cd, then add cd
as urpmi source.
Which still calls for a hdlist.cz describing the packages on that CD. It will
not be accepted
On Saturday 18 October 2003 23:35, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 13:30, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 13:48, Greg Meyer wrote:
Download the rpms you want from the mirrors, burn them to cd, then add
cd as urpmi source.
Which still calls for a hdlist.cz
On Saturday 18 October 2003 22:27, Olaf Marzocchi wrote:
Ok, but I have to wait until 9.2 will be available for everyone.
Olaf
It already is and has been all along..check the mirrors. It's only the 9.2
iso's that aren't available allover (yet).
Good luck,
HarM
--
Registered Linux User
On Saturday 18 October 2003 05:42 pm, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
Here's a nice one to get your battered brain in gear:
Got any tips on an easy way to keep all the other PC's on the LAN in sync
without each and everyone ftp-ing and rsyncing over the www?
It just seems a waste of bandwidth to me
On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 14:42, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 23:35, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 13:30, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Saturday 18 October 2003 13:48, Greg Meyer wrote:
Download the rpms you want from the mirrors, burn them to cd, then add
cd
On Thursday, 16 October 2003 20:35, Thomas Backlund wrote:
From: Praedor Atrebates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A bit more information and I am no longer prepared to be T'd off when I
get my
CDs. I see that the bare-bones, 3CD iso download addition is what is
missing
the kernel source, not
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
compilations ?
Also, kernel2.4-marcelo could be dropped, there are also 4 kernel-doc
packages, one (or even none) would be sufficient. And maybe kernel-secure,
which is really for professional use ?
Eric
Want to buy your Pack
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 09:41, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Err, in following this thread my first thought is: isn't not supplying the
kernel source technically a violation of GPL? The HAVE to supply the source
and should make allowances
Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
compilations ?
been done for years.
I don't see a kernel-headers package since 9.0 (and maybe even before).
Am I mistaken ?
Eric
Want to buy your Pack or
At 20.35 16/10/2003, you wrote:
The reason for dropping kernel-source, was AFAIK to make room for all the
kde-i18n, koffice-i18n stuff... as you know mdk supports *many*
languages...
i18n and similar were in other MDK distro... so they added something else,
your explanation isn't an explanation.
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 07:46, Eric Fernandez wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
compilations ?
been done for years.
I don't see a kernel-headers package since 9.0 (and
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 11:29, Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 07:46, Eric Fernandez wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
compilations ?
been done for years.
From: Olaf Marzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 20.35 16/10/2003, you wrote:
The reason for dropping kernel-source, was AFAIK to make room for all the
kde-i18n, koffice-i18n stuff... as you know mdk supports *many*
languages...
i18n and similar were in other MDK distro... so they added something
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 08:34, ed tharp wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 11:29, Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 07:46, Eric Fernandez wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
compilations ?
Also, kernel2.4-marcelo could be dropped, there are also 4 kernel-doc
packages, one (or even none) would be sufficient. And maybe kernel-secure,
which is really for
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 07:46, Eric Fernandez wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
compilations ?
been done for years.
I don't see a kernel-headers package since 9.0 (and
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 08:29, Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 07:46, Eric Fernandez wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
compilations ?
been done for years.
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 08:34, ed tharp wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 11:29, Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 07:46, Eric Fernandez wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
compilations ?
Also, kernel2.4-marcelo could be dropped, there are also 4 kernel-doc
packages, one (or even none) would be sufficient. And maybe kernel-secure,
which is really for
On Friday 17 October 2003 10:44 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
compilations ?
Also, kernel2.4-marcelo could be dropped, there are also 4 kernel-doc
packages, one (or even none) would
On Friday 17 October 2003 11:21 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2003 10:44 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 02:52, ef2 wrote:
What about splitting the kernel into source and headers, for driver
compilations ?
Also, kernel2.4-marcelo could be dropped, there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Err, in following this thread my first thought is: isn't not supplying the
kernel source technically a violation of GPL? The HAVE to supply the source
and should make allowances (reductions in certain packages) if it is not
possible to put the
Praedor Atrebates kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Torstai 16 Lokakuu 2003
19:41):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Err, in following this thread my first thought is: isn't not supplying the
kernel source technically a violation of GPL? The HAVE to supply the
source and
kernels could have been on the powerpack CD or downloaded.
Joeb
-Original Message-
From: Praedor Atrebates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 16, 2003 11:41 AM
To: Mandrake Expert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] Missing kernel source from 9.2 isos...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, thanks for the clarification...that said however, I am now concerned that
I wasted my money by purchasing 9.2. I expect the CDs to arrive by the end
of the month and expect the source to be included as my Nvidia card is
essentially useless
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A bit more information and I am no longer prepared to be T'd off when I get my
CDs. I see that the bare-bones, 3CD iso download addition is what is missing
the kernel source, not what I ordered (nor what anyone paid for). Given
this, it is still
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:11:03 -0500
Praedor Atrebates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, thanks for the clarification...that said however, I am now
concerned that I wasted my money by purchasing 9.2. I expect the
CDs to arrive by the end of the month and expect the source to be
included as my
From: Praedor Atrebates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A bit more information and I am no longer prepared to be T'd off when I
get my
CDs. I see that the bare-bones, 3CD iso download addition is what is
missing
the kernel source, not what I ordered (nor what anyone paid for). Given
this, it is still not
59 matches
Mail list logo
