This statement made my informants in Texas laugh heartily:
I've probably posted 10,000 messages here without a response.
and nothing but net!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
One account - multiple aliases. No moderators. Who cares?
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:18 PM, salyavin808 mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Why has Willytex got more than one account? Isn't it bad enough we got 20
Richard, this one made me smile, thank you.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 6:44 PM, Pundit Sir wrote:
One account - multiple aliases. No moderators. Who cares?
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:18 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
>
>
>
>Why has Willytex got more than one account? Isn't it bad enough we
> Isn't it bad enough we got 200 posts a week from him anyway?
*>*
*The more messages, the better - that's what I think.*
*>*
You got zero messages from me - what you got was a choice to read my
messages or not to read them.
> Time for some moderation.
I agree, especially since he says the sa
One account - multiple aliases. No moderators. Who cares?
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:18 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
>
>
>
> Why has Willytex got more than one account? Isn't it bad enough we got 200
> posts a week from him anyway?
>
> Time for some moderation.
>
> ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
My informants report that it's a desperate attempt by Wilytex to make it all
about Wilytex. They say he's been stuck on repeat down on the cemetery where he
lives in Texas for many moons now and doesn't even make much sense anymore. Go
figure
My informants report that it's a desperate attempt by Wilytex to make it all
about Wilytex. They say he's been stuck on repeat down on the cemetery where he
lives in Texas for many moons now and doesn't even make much sense anymore. Go
figure.
Why has Willytex got more than one account? Is
Comments..
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Actually he doesn't have more than one account. The other handles are usually
due to logging in from email.
Oh, I assumed he was pulling a fast one from the good old days when you
exercised a bit of self control or took a week o
Actually he doesn't have more than one account. The other handles are
usually due to logging in from email. For instance in my case if I post
via email my handle is displayed as Bhairitu but when posting via the
web site it is bhairitu. It's a Yahoo Groups quirk or unresolved bug.
You may r
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Why has Willytex got more than one account? Isn't it bad enough we got 200
posts a week from him anyway?
Time for some moderation.
I agree, especially since he says the same three things over and over.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.c
Why has Willytex got more than one account? Isn't it bad enough we got 200
posts a week from him anyway?
Time for some moderation.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Apparently Judy is able to read some Latin, but not much Spanish; and she
cannot read one single word of Tibe
Apparently Judy is able to read some Latin, but not much Spanish; and she
cannot read one single word of Tibetan. LoL!
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Share Long wrote:
>
>
> Judy, it was a joke about your use of the word snicker. I'm sure you know
> lots of Latin. About joke:
> Latin *jocus;
> *And you know what? Richard is just as happy to lie to you as to anybody
else on FFL.*
*>*
So, you've never seen an episode of Dr. Who on TV - I'm sure this won't be
lost on Barry. LoL!
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:38 AM, wrote:
>
>
> Obviously it was an attempt at a joke. The point is, you can
Obviously it was an attempt at a joke. The point is, you can't even make up
meaningful jokes.
Judy, it was a joke about your use of the word snicker. I'm sure you know lots
of Latin. About joke: Latin jocus; perhaps akin to Old High German gehan to
say, Sanskrit yācati he asks
On Monday,
Judy, it was a joke about your use of the word snicker. I'm sure you know lots
of Latin. About joke:
Latin jocus; perhaps akin to Old High German gehan to say, Sanskrit yācati he
asks
On Monday, March 31, 2014 9:44 AM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Hey, Share, why don't you just make up
Hey, Share, why don't you just make up some stuff out of thin air and pretend
you're actually saying something meaningful? I guess that's the only way you
can convince yourself you look smart.
(BTW, apparently you aren't aware of this, but it's very difficult to speak
English without knowing
Ok, Richard, that's funny about running joke. Meanwhile, back at the ranch, it
appears that Judy doesn't know any words that are derived from Latin. Go figure!
On Monday, March 31, 2014 9:23 AM, Richard J. Williams
wrote:
On 3/30/2014 4:19 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Still at it...
>
On 3/30/2014 4:19 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Still at it...
>
Apparently Judy has never seen an episode of Dr. Who - if she had, she
would know that Dr. Who is constantly running to get to into tardy
TARDIS. Yes, it's kind of a running joke. LoL!
Richard, I was wondering if that's a
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Richard, I was wondering if that's a running joke in the show, which I've
never seen. I think that would be pretty funny to have a time machine that's
always tardy. Like, you ask to be sent to 1750 and instead you get sent to
1790. Thanks, alwa
Still at it...
Richard, I was wondering if that's a running joke in the show, which I've
never seen. I think that would be pretty funny to have a time machine that's
always tardy. Like, you ask to be sent to 1750 and instead you get sent to
1790. Thanks, always fun to learn the Latin too.
On 3/30/2014 10:30 AM, Share Long wrote:
> Richard, I was wondering if that's a running joke in the show, which
> I've never seen. I think that would be pretty funny to have a time
> machine that's always tardy. Like, you ask to be sent to 1750 and
> instead you get sent to 1790. Thanks, always
Richard, I was wondering if that's a running joke in the show, which I've never
seen. I think that would be pretty funny to have a time machine that's always
tardy. Like, you ask to be sent to 1750 and instead you get sent to 1790.
Thanks, always fun to learn the Latin too.
On Sunday, March 30
On 3/30/2014 6:28 AM, Share Long wrote:
Richard, good catch! What do you think would be a good solution to
that problem?
>
Thanks. Yes, I think a good solution to the problem might be for Barry,
or anyone else, not to post anymore claims about having witnessed
paranormal demonstrations in an e
On 3/30/2014 8:08 AM, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote:
> This particular thread is heading out in to the sea of needless mean
> unkindness.
>
So, you don't want to talk about the Post Count. Go figure.
On 3/30/2014 8:42 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Please stop this before it gets any worse.
>
This forum is not about "yogic flying", Buck, it's all about the Post
Count. It doesn't get any better than this.
On 3/29/2014 9:30 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
See what I mean?
>
No. What do you mean? In the TV show Dr.Who, the TARDIS is quite often
tardy. Go figure.
Origin of TARDY:
alteration of earlier tardif, from Anglo-French, from Vulgar Latin
*tardivus, from Latin tardus
First Known Use:
Buck, I will do penance today and pray for Sharon and for Richard and for Barry
and for you and for the rest of the FFL community. I have no intention to be
unkind; I was simply calling a spade a spade, given Sharon's unkind remarks to
me yesterday. They do not seem to be rooted in "knowledge"
Dear Dear FFL Moderators;
Please stop this before it gets any worse. This particular thread is heading
out in to the sea of needless mean unkindness. Could you please have these
people take their personal stuff off line. That would be nicer and more in line
with the Yahoo-groups guidelines. If
Sharon, I think I figured it out. You were jealous yesterday, weren't you?
Was I butting in on your guy? You like to feel like you are at the top of the
heap. This is why you took those gratuitous pot shots at me that had no
explanation or reason behind them. Just vacuous attack language from
Richard, good catch! What do you think would be a good solution to that problem?
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 2:53 PM, Richard J. Williams
wrote:
On 3/29/2014 12:58 PM, Share Long wrote:
> Watch out, Richard, endless rabbit hole dead ahead!
>
Yes, I think maybe, but I'm not sure, but it's s
See what I mean?
Name and form, Richard, name and form. Does one really want a time machine
whose name TARDIS evokes the idea of tardiness?!
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 5:07 PM, Richard J. Williams
wrote:
On 3/29/2014 4:27 PM, Share Long wrote:
> I'm still hung up on the fact that t
Name and form, Richard, name and form. Does one really want a time machine
whose name TARDIS evokes the idea of tardiness?!
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 5:07 PM, Richard J. Williams
wrote:
On 3/29/2014 4:27 PM, Share Long wrote:
> I'm still hung up on the fact that they call the time mach
She did look it up after her first response about Richard's "insight" didn't
quite make the grade. But she didn't read far enough.
Richard, I'm still hung up on the fact that they call the time machine Tardis,
you know, like tardy! You might wonder what's in a name. Then again, you might
n
On 3/29/2014 4:27 PM, Share Long wrote:
> I'm still hung up on the fact that they call the time machine Tardis,
> you know, like tardy!
>
Good one, Share!
TARDIS - Time and Relative Dimension in Space.
"A TARDIS is a product of the advanced technology of the Time Lords, an
extraterrestrial civ
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Richard, I'm still hung up on the fact that they call the time machine Tardis,
you know, like tardy! You might wonder what's in a name. Then again, you might
not!
No, not like tardy at all. Look it up.
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 2:51 PM, R
On 3/29/2014 2:38 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Have you picked up on any of the feedback I've been giving you?
>
Yes, and we thank you for that. It's just that when the cult members put
Fred up on a pedestal, and had him sit cross-legged up on that stage,
dressed in a suit and tie, and the
On 3/29/2014 2:50 PM, Share Long wrote:
> Richard, I admit I feel compassion for this Lenz fellow if he got into
> altering the perceptions of other people psychically. No wonder he
> ended up committing suicide.
>
Yes I agree, we all should feel compassion for Lenz. And for Barry too,
for goin
Richard, I'm still hung up on the fact that they call the time machine Tardis,
you know, like tardy! You might wonder what's in a name. Then again, you might
not!
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 2:51 PM, Richard J. Williams
wrote:
On 3/29/2014 12:56 PM, Share Long wrote:
> Emily, Richard's m
On 3/29/2014 12:58 PM, Share Long wrote:
> Watch out, Richard, endless rabbit hole dead ahead!
>
Yes, I think maybe, but I'm not sure, but it's starting to look like,
we've got a brain problem situation on our hands.
On 3/29/2014 12:56 PM, Share Long wrote:
> Emily, Richard's main insight, imo, is that he enjoys life and doesn't
> take FFL arguments seriously.
>
Share, we have to ask ourselves why somebody would want to levitate
themselves up into the air in front of a group of people when everyone
knows th
Richard, I admit I feel compassion for this Lenz fellow if he got into altering
the perceptions of other people psychically. No wonder he ended up committing
suicide.
Anyway, just in case you're still wondering as Emily suggests: I have not
experienced the 2nd stage of yogic flying. Go figure!
On 3/29/2014 12:55 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
> it all depends on how word "real" is defined and within what context
> it is defined within.
>
According to Barry, the levitation was not REAL - it was a psychic
siddhi-float with altered perceptions.
"I will also admit, for the same reason
On 3/29/2014 12:47 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Re: "We are thinking about buying us a little Tardis" HA HA HA HA.
SHARE, can you divine one of Richard's meaningful "insights" out of
this statement of his?
>
In some ways, things are smaller on the outside of the Tardis. Go figure.
On 3/29/2014 12:37 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
> And how many years ago was that?
>
Barry seemed to do a 180 just about the time he first got into a big
argument with Judy, some time back in 1999. Ever since then, if Judy is
for it, Barry is against it. But, before that, he was a TB defendi
Well Richard, it *is* hard to see ourselves for who we are, is it not? Have
you picked up on any of the feedback I've been giving you? Give it timeand
have a pleasant tomorrow.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/29/2014 12:36 PM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@...
Share, don't forget about this. It appears that you are scared of me, but with
the kind of adoration you lavish on Richard, I would think that you would be
thrilled to give him the courtesy of answering his question to you and engaging
in a meaningful conversation about said topic. Are you abl
On 3/29/2014 12:36 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Why are you asking all these questions here on FFL years after Fred is
> dead? Why do you want to know? Why don't you post to a Rama site?
> Why are you so obsessed with Fred?
>
Well, I guess I'm just curious why Barry is a True Believer,
Share, come on now. Why are you warning Richard about me? Why do you see an
"endless rabbit hole dead ahead?" Give me some feedback worth something; what
you've said is meaningless.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Emily, yes and yes.
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:30 PM, "
Emily, yes and yes.
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:30 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Share, what the heck do you mean by this? Try and be clear with me. Are you
warning Richard about me? Or are you alerting him to the fact he's about to
step into a rabbit hole that continues down th
On 3/29/2014 10:23 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
There was no issue of "stilling thoughts" sitting in those rooms with
him; the silence was so powerful that you simply *couldn't* have
thoughts.
>
So, for what purpose would anyone sit still with no thoughts? You've
already ruled out enlightenment. A
Translation: No, Emily, I can't. But I'll pretend I can, because that's how I
do things.
Emily, Richard's main insight, imo, is that he enjoys life and doesn't take
FFL arguments seriously.
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 12:47 PM, "emilymaenot@..."
wrote:
Re: "We are thinking about buyi
On 3/29/2014 10:21 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
according to Barry, he saw Lenz levitate in many different situations,
not just lecture halls or places where he might have had help staging
an illusion.
>
Not much credence needs to be given to a few former cult members in
their anonymous rep
Share, what the heck do you mean by this? Try and be clear with me. Are you
warning Richard about me? Or are you alerting him to the fact he's about to
step into a rabbit hole that continues down through the earth's core to the
other side of the planet and the space beyond?
---In Fairfiel
Share, do you care to answer Richard's direct question to you as stated below?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/29/2014 12:24 PM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
The question posed was "has anyone
heard of anyone reaching 2nd stage flying" - levitation?
> > According to Barry, the levitation was not REAL- it was
> > just a Rama SIDDHI thing. A magician can do a lot when
> > he is up on a stage in a dark lecture hall with assistants
> > mall around. It's not complicated. H.P Blavatsky apparently
> > used to do these kinds of parlor tricks all the
Share, you are "in love." Richard, the woman just can't get enough of your
"insights;" act like a gentleman and try not to lead her on.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Emily, I find the majority of Richard's posts delightful so even 300 would be
fine with me. Go figure!
Emily, I find the majority of Richard's posts delightful so even 300 would be
fine with me. Go figure!
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:05 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Do you think he needs almost or more than 200 posts a week to make this insight
clear to you? Do you think he could
Do you think he needs almost or more than 200 posts a week to make this insight
clear to you? Do you think he could communicate this in 10? After all, he
isn't the only one who says "enjoy life and don't take yourself too seriously."
Are you just learning this? In your case, my opinion is th
Watch out, Richard, endless rabbit hole dead ahead!
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 12:56 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Richard, if you would stop parsing my conversation with you, you wouldn't have
to keep repeating the answer I keep giving you. Do you disagree with me? Are
you talki
Richard, if you would stop parsing my conversation with you, you wouldn't have
to keep repeating the answer I keep giving you. Do you disagree with me? Are
you talking to me, or trying to have a conversation with Barry through me?
IMO, it all depends on how word "real" is defined and within w
Emily, Richard's main insight, imo, is that he enjoys life and doesn't take FFL
arguments seriously.
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 12:47 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Re: "We are thinking about buying us a little Tardis" HA HA HA HA. SHARE,
can you divine one of Richard's meaning
Re: "We are thinking about buying us a little Tardis" HA HA HA HA. SHARE,
can you divine one of Richard's meaningful "insights" out of this statement of
his?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/29/2014 12:24 PM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
The questio
On 3/29/2014 12:24 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
What is confusing for you?
>
Why did Barry feel the compulsion to tell us that DID see "real"
levitation when it is obvious that - even in his own words - what he
experienced was very far from what could be remotely described as
"real"? That
On 3/29/2014 12:24 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
The question posed was "has anyone
heard of anyone reaching 2nd stage flying" - levitation?
Are you still asking Barry or those invested in the TMSP, like Share?
Why don't you ask Share?
>
Asking anyone. Share, Judy, or anybody that knows ab
And how many years ago was that? Why do you give a rats ass? Why don't you
update the question and ask it of someone who is currently involved, like
Share, for example.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/29/2014 12:24 PM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
On
Why are you asking all these questions here on FFL years after Fred is dead?
Why do you want to know? Why don't you post to a Rama site? Why are you so
obsessed with Fred?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/29/2014 10:23 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
the reason I stuck around
On 3/29/2014 12:24 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Only to those invested in the TMSP.
Oh...well, that would be Barry, right?
>
Yeah, he said he gave the TMO $5,000 to learn the TMSP. So,I was just
wondering if he learned anything about that, and why he would then give
Lenz another $10,000
On 3/29/2014 10:23 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
the reason I stuck around with the Rama guy for so long was because of
what it was like to meditate with him (at least in the early years).
>
So, I wonder why after all those years and all those dollars spent on
Rama seminars, Lenz never transferred en
Below.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/29/2014 10:52 AM, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
> Is this relevant to anything or anybody?
>
Only to those invested in the TMSP.
Oh...well, that would be Barry, right?
The question posed was "has anyone
On 3/29/2014 10:23 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
Second, he keeps doing it in the hope he'll push my buttons and get a
rise out of me.
>
So, how are you going to rise up if you can't fly? Maybe you better pad
your room with foam so that when you fall down it won't hurt so bad. I
guess when you get u
On 3/29/2014 10:23 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
First, he's jealous of anyone who has had spiritual experiences he
hasn't,
>
Once, when I was down in Mexico, I saw God Almighty, His beautiful wife
Sophia, and their daughter Ashley, and their son, Baal, all levitating
right in front of me alongside
On 3/29/2014 10:52 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Is this relevant to anything or anybody?
>
Only to those invested in the TMSP. The question posed was "has anyone
heard of anyone reaching 2nd stage flying" - levitation?
The only respondent on FFL that answered yes was Barry, who claimed he
Below:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From: "emilymaenot@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Post Count Fri 21-Mar-14 00:15:03 UTC
Richard, is your point here that you believe Rama was
From: "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Post Count Fri 21-Mar-14 00:15:03 UTC
Richard, is your point here that you believe Rama was a magician? O.K. If this
brings you closure than
As you know, Richard--because you quoted Barry's post saying so--according to
Barry, he saw Lenz levitate in many different situations, not just lecture
halls or places where he might have had help staging an illusion. It's fine to
make Barry look foolish by questioning what it was that Barry sa
Richard, is your point here that you believe Rama was a magician? O.K. If this
brings you closure than go with it. Is this relevant to anything or anybody? I
made my point and I'm letting it go. Try to do the same. You might feel
better.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
O
On 3/28/2014 7:27 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
> The point I was making to you is that it is false to continue to
> state that Barry was the *only* person to have the experience of Rama
> levitating.
>
According to Barry, the levitation was not REAL- it was just a Rama
SIDDHI thing. A mag
I couldn't get to the interviews from those links. But from the links provided
a few months ago, I'd say that he came off better in print than he did on live
interviews.
Re: I try to remember the good parts of the ride.
Clearly, you've moved on. Richard, on the other hand, hasn't. Smile.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
wrote :
From: "emilymaenot@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mai
PM, wrote:
>
>
> Re: I try to remember the good parts of the ride.
> Clearly, you've moved on. Richard, on the other hand, hasn't. Smile.
>
>
> ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
>
> *From:* "emilymaenot@..."
>
> *To:* FairfieldLife
It was Harri Aalto, the Finnish fellow. Posted on March 27th. Rick sent FFL a
link as always. I haven't listened to the interview, but read the Intro - it
is pretty interesting.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
The latest interview was Menos Kafatos, and the one before that
The latest interview was Menos Kafatos, and the one before that was Jack
Petranker. Was it one of those, because I read the write ups, and nothing
jumped out at me.
Let me also say, that I haven't really read any books on spiritual
personalities in about 20 years. The Lenz interviews I read
6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Post Count Fri 21-Mar-14 00:15:03 UTC
I agree that there was definitely something about Rama. I don't really have
a theory and come from a place of ignorance on the topic of "enlightenment" -
having never studied, read about, or pursued such a st
On 3/28/2014 8:21 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ever seen Lenz on videotape?
>
Yes, but I have never seen a videotape of Lenz levitating.
Apparently this is because there is a certain Woo Woo that can be
employed making the images disappear off the tape. Several of the Lenz
talks about medi
From: "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Post Count Fri 21-Mar-14 00:15:03 UTC
I agree that there was definitely something about Rama. I don't really have a
theory and come
I agree that there was definitely something about Rama. I don't really have a
theory and come from a place of ignorance on the topic of "enlightenment" -
having never studied, read about, or pursued such a state. However, people are
born with different levels of sensitivity - that I believe, so
Re: which he claimed he witnessed on hundreds of occasions, but which nobody
else ever mentions. Not true Richardno need to keep falsifying this point.
http://www.imeditate.com/rama/docs/LastIncarnation.pdf
http://www.imeditate.com/rama/docs/LastIncarnation.pdf
---In FairfieldLife@yahoo
"For people attending Rama’s talks, witnessing levitation, disappearance,
beautiful colors and waves of golden light all around Rama and spreading
through the hall or room – were commonplace."
http://www.ramameditationsociety.org/rama-dr-frederick-lenz
http://www.ramameditationsociety.org/rama-
Ever seen Lenz on videotape? There are some very interesting clips of his
interview with John Hockenberry for Dateline NBC. Here's a post with a bunch of
URLs to those clips (some are just of Hockenberry talking to Lenz's former
followers):
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/co
As I said previously, I've read autobiographies, and biographies of people who
were said to be enlightened. A few that come to mind are Yogananda,
Muktananda, Ramakrishna, Vivekenanda, with a very notable mention for Elizibeth
Haich. I've read books by them, or about them, and I came way feeli
Re: I happen to be in the camp that thinks Fred had achieved a remarkable
level of consciousnesses.
I have no idea what that means, honestly"a remarkable level of
consciousness." My sense is that he had skills and abilities that not everyone
has...perhaps he was born with them, perhaps
Sure, I understand. I happen to be in the camp that thinks Fred had achieved a
remarkable level of consciousnesses. For me it is based on the transcripts of
two interviews he gave. Maybe going back, I might feel differently. But I've
read my share of books on, or about, supposed enlightened
Nope, I can't. But, I believe that Mark L. and others had the early
experiences they did with Fred. I am not weighing in on the how or why of it
all. Notice Steve, that I've left myself an enormous amount of wiggle room
here using the phrase "altered perception." Many things can create an
ex
Emily, can you elaborate on how this typically works?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Why Richard, whydo you continue to obsess on Fred Lenz? Why oh why oh
why? Rama had the ability to alter one's perception...well before the drugs
took over. He's not the only one who ha
On 3/25/2014 7:10 PM, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote:
So, what do you make of the first sentence on the page you linked to
at the bottom of your post. If Buddhism is all about enlightenment,
what does this experience represent? Does it indicate that all those
commentaries and books, which presumabl
On 3/25/2014 8:40 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/25/2014 1:54 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
It's like Judy has lost 20 or more IQ points by associating with
the only two followers she's got left, Jim and Ann.
>
Maybe you just don't rea
Why Richard, whydo you continue to obsess on Fred Lenz? Why oh why oh why?
Rama had the ability to alter one's perception...well before the drugs took
over. He's not the only one who had/has this ability. Get over it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
On 3/25/2014 8:44 AM,
On 3/25/2014 8:44 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
I have no interest in "engaging" with you, Jim, for any reason
whatsoever. You're a mental midget with psychological problems so
severe that you feel the need to pretend that you're enlightened. What
could there possibly be to talk about?
The only per
On 3/25/2014 8:38 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It *is* a viable question, n'est-ce pas? Especially for someone who
seems to never tire of telling people how enlightened he is, and so
perfectly in tune with the Laws Of Nature, and so much mor
fMRI is not used by the TMO for several reasons:
1) the equipment is darned expensive (a single state-of-the-art fMRI machine
would cost almost as much as MIU cost when it was bought, and the overhead for
running/maintaining it would be a substantial fraction of the entire MUM
operating budge
1 - 100 of 288 matches
Mail list logo