Bronte writes:
The following email, posted on the ex-amma website, is from a former insider
devotee who claims she was on the edge of Amma's inner circle for many years.
This is what she claims to have seen.
Jayson,
When I referred to her organization as being
masquerading I am
Bronte writes:
Here is a statement from Amma's former Joint Secretary in charge of accounts
about the fraudulent nature of Amma's charities.
Exerpt from Message 283 in files of ex-amma website:
Im enclosing below a statement that was emailed to the Amma satsang groups
by one of
The ex-amma website is closed to Amma proselytizers for the protection of its
members, most of whom consider themselves healing from involvement in a cult.
They come to the forum to share experiences and recovery, not to argue or
defend themselves against true believers. (See description below
Hi, gang -
I'm not receiving FFL emails anymore but am still officially signed in to
this forum, and I ran across something today too good not to share with
everybody. You can google this book and order it if you like what you read. I,
for one, plan to get it.
Best to all,
at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for letting me be a part of your intellectual life, one of the
richest levels of our human existence. I will remember you always.
Love,
Bronte Baxter
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has
Angela Mailander wrote:
Who's they is a good question, and I know for sure that I can't know what the
upper levels of the governing hierarchy are. I know for sure the Vatican was
very much involved in the creation of Hitler. And Wall Street was ultimately
responsible for the financing. In
Dear Turq, the world isn't bettered by merely noticing the sunshine and the
birds. As long as there is suffering in it, there are things that need worked
out. TM was a bliss-based movement, that taught us all to think positive
thoughts and life would be just groovey. Turned out that wasn't so.
His point, Angela, seems to be that your paralleling the TMO and Nazi Germany
is not to be taken seriously because, unlike the Nazis, the movement has never
committed violence. True. However, fiesty Feste, Angela did already address
this fact in her first or second post on the subject. She said
Hugh wrote:
If you are seriously interested in human origins a much better place
to start research would be the books of Richard Dawkins, try
the Blind Watchmaker or River out of Eden A good understanding of
evolution is an essential starting place before considering the tripe
tossed out by
do.rflx wrote:
I look at the quantity of people like myself in that seemingly
'unique' and 'special' time frame who were 'lost' in the darker side
of the hippie daze [days], or just plain 'lost' - and because of TM
became positive and hopeful for probably the first time in many of
their lives.
was the whole point of my it's free to all of us
post.
- Bronte
curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a fairly clear channel for my God
Double uh oh.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do.rflx wrote:
I look at the quantity
?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
brontebaxter8@ wrote:
His point, Angela, seems to be that your paralleling the TMO and
Nazi Germany is not to be taken seriously because, unlike the
Nazis,
the movement has never committed violence. True. However, fiesty
Feste
:
Bronte Baxter wrote:
snip
What I come up with is this. TM did deliver experience of the stillest states
of awareness, that most of us had been too outward-directed ever to have
noticed before. It pointed us toward home. That was fantastic. But just as a
bad product offer can include a really
I was thinking about this incredible poem by Rudyard Kipling today, which I
memorized in high school. It was written by a man who believed wholly in free
will and our power as individuals to create a better destiny, even a better
character, for ourselves. A pretty unpopular concept these days
From Angela of the Wednesday night satsang again: Note: forwarded to
Bronte and Posted
snip
Angela wrote about the Wednesday satsang group, on their forum:
Though I have seen some wisdom in this group, I have also seen too
much pompous shit, and with that, I am outa here.
Lurk wrote,
not
looking to deeply offend or start a war (I know our beliefs are held
to be sacred :) ) but if you're willing to look at this point, I would
enjoy continuing to discuss it with you and anyone else who wants to.
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note: forwarded
There are all kinds of misunderstandings that can slip into real-life
relationships, just as in cyber ones, if they aren't talked out at the time.
When this happens in real life, people build resentments, and in marriages, an
accumulation of enough of these leads to a divorce. It's hard on a
,
weight: 1, type: [shortcuts:/us/place/virtual/web_site], category:
[IDENTIFIER], context: a a Bronte Baxter brontebaxter8 yahoo.com wrote
From Angela of the }, lw_1192388050_2: { text: Play Monopoly Here and
Now, extended: 0, startchar: 5254, endchar: 5280, start: 5254, end:
5280
New Age and
Naziism, so we could discuss them. - Bronte
Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bronte Baxter wrote:
Another reason I left, though, was that they really were completely unwilling
to deal with the questions I, personally, have about the whole enlightenment
trip. I
Vaj wrote:
As you know, the Vedas depict many great demons, such as Ravana, as being
extremely charismatic, learned, and highly evolved. In some cases the story is
told that the demon had the choice of being born into a series of righteous
lives or one demonic life in which they would be
Flanegin wrote:
My friend's response was that that attitude was a cop-out which
allowed people to rationalize all sorts of mischief by gurus and
other leaders.
Thanks for sharing this-- Its a great piece of writing! I'd agree
that good and evil, light and dark, balance each other out in
Flanegin wrote:
My friend's response was that that attitude was a cop-out which
allowed people to rationalize all sorts of mischief by gurus and
other leaders.
Thanks for sharing this-- Its a great piece of writing! I'd agree
that good and evil, light and dark, balance each other out in
In what sense do you think Turq is like Nazi-like? He is devoted to complete
individual freedom, as far as I can tell. That's the opposite of Nazism. -
Bronte
off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote
Jim wrote:
That is Rory's business. I think he went on to add that he had been
with Hitler in a past life. Are you implying that because of Rory's
vision, this is irrefutable proof that Maharishi IS a hitler, or a
nazi? Again please refer to my earlier question about when he begins
amassing
Note: forwarded message attached.
-
Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings,
and more!---BeginMessage---
Dear Bronte Baxter,
Thanks for posting that passionate piece challenging basic assumptions on the
nature
Bronte wrote some weeks back:And where does it leave the new
visitors, often people disillusioned
or questioning TM, looking for a safe place to talk about and share
experiences? They can't do it at Fairfield Life, unless they want to
be fried and eaten for breakfast.
Judy wrote
Queenie wrote:
What I wrote is my truth. It is a private thing outside of the group that I
would never
otherwise share with anyone but my closest friends and relatives. I
was asked to expand on my truth, and I did. I would never post to FFL
anything like this because of the inability
She wrote:
An addendum: Also, a very salient point left out that I always stress to the
group and
others is that it is not the experience that we are looking for, it is what
it brings to us in the form of knowledge that matters. Focus on the
knowledge not the experience. When one finds
. a
Bronte Baxter brontebaxter8@ yahoo.com wrote:
Bronte wrote some weeks back: And where does it leave the new
visitors, often people disillusioned
or questioning TM, looking for a safe place to talk about and share
experiences? They can't do it at Fairfield Life, unless they want
PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bronte wrote some weeks back:
And where does it leave the new visitors, often people
disillusioned or questioning TM, looking for a safe place
to talk about and share experiences? They can't
:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jude darlin', if you want to see me as a hypocrite, that's your
right. I stand on what I wrote. If you can't see the difference
between telling a person they are dog's offel that has been eaten and
regurgitated
, obviously. I should have listened. All is lost
(enlightenment included) in a community in which you are not allowed to cream
someone for spouting pompous shit. Though I have seen some wisdom in this
group, I have also seen too much pompous shit, and with that, I am outa here. a
Bronte Baxter [EMAIL
I may be being inconsistent, Judy. I dont think hypocritical, because that
implies conscious adherence to ones inconsistency. Where I am wrong (and I
often am), I do want to change. I know something is wrong here, but I dont
know what.
You are clearly angry at me. I think I get why.
to
particular cases. On a lumber suit, you had people named Timber and Oakes. On
other cases you had lawyers named Swindle and Lyer.
TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I LOVED your Road Trip story! Talk
Edg, you have fallen off the white horse. Come on, buddy. This is just wrong.
You were one of the main forces on this forum for cleaning up the flaming. You
inspired us all. Now, you've let your inner devil out and given him a good kick
in the pants on top of it to really get him going.
And Edg, if Barry's worst critic says it, you know it's got to be true. You say
deal with the issues but you're questioning someone's personal integrity and
demanding they defend it, which it's not their job to do here. Barry is
avoiding getting triggered and drawn into a fight. He might have
Ron wrote:
When sincere seekers are there , the universe offers a choice. Probably when
the sincerety is kept up, more choices come along the way and the time frame is
eternity so no need to worry.
It looks like out of the 6 billion people on the planet, not many follow a
Guru, this is
Nabloss:
Might I suggest to get a checking ? ;-)
Bronte:
Your mantra, applied quite humorously here. Nabby, you crack me up.
nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 6, 2007, at 11:10 AM,
Turq:
I ran into Joni Mitchell a couple of times. Once is written up in one of the
stories in
Road Trip Mind. The other was at a gathering with Yaqui medicine man
Grandfather Cachora.
Bronte:
Joni MItchell was an icon of my youth. My idol. I memorized 90 percent of her
song
snip
But eventually, if you are to become enlightened yourself,
You have to take the final leap, yourself.
And if you have a good guru, he or she will push you, when you are
ready.
Well, nobody pushed Siddhartha. He broke with the gurus and found the flaw in
what they were teaching.
Good song. But kittens don't always figure out how to get down. Some of them do
starve in the tops of trees. Damsels sometimes are in distress, and heros
sometimes rescue them. Remember Pretty Woman? Great story. She and he rescued
each other.
As a woman who's been on my own a long time
Bronte wrote:
She came across in her songs as a lady of all heart yet great strength.
Turq wrote:
It's easier to see the strength these days. She tends to keep her heart a
little more hidden.
Bronte writes:
Yeah. That started around the time she turned from writing folk to
I empathize with all three of you guys. Did you read where Edg wrote about his
younger sister who at the age of 15 got seduced to run off with an older man
and marry him, a move that virtually wrecked her life? I think Edg's strong
feelings on this subject probably come from there. You aren't a
snip
Bingo. Edg must be reading from the same manual as Rick about how
damsels in distress need rescuing from relationships of their own
choosing.
Sal
Bronte writes;
I meant to add in my other post that I am with Edg on his desire to protect
young girls from the dangers. No, Sal, they
Great post. When I was a young girl, I thought my generation was superior
because our beliefs and ideas weren't all boxed in like our parents'. We were
willing to question basic assumptions -- like democracy, Christianity, the
purpose of life -- and often come up with new, fresh answers. That
My feeling about abortion is this: it is much more ethical if you do it without
causing pain. Aborting a fetus that is developed to the point where it has a
recognizable body is probably going to cause pain to a living thing. Aborting a
cluster of cells that's a few days or weeks old, where no
Wow, Curtis. This was brilliant. - Bronte
curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People who are insulted by Rick offering certain women's experiences
with their gurus, but are not insulted by the guru's reported behavior
strike me as value challenged...
Reporting what someone
How about this for a parable? A man met a man who told him about air. You
can't live without it, he was told. But I already have air, said the first man.
I am breathing every moment. No you aren't, said the second man. You can't
possibly be breathing if you haven't had a teacher show you
I think the domes have some effect, much as I have gripes against the movement.
I used to teach school at MIU Elementary, often missing the domes because I was
in rebellion at the time, or just plain busy correcting papers. Every day when
superradiance time came, I felt an intense calm, an
Of Bronte Baxter
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:32 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The fallacy is that a *Me* can Gain Realization
Christ said I and the Father are One where is the two in that?
They are one but they are also
? I'm
talking in a different way about the same thing.
- Bronte
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bronte Baxter
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:32 PM
Billy wrote:
I think in order for it to be stronger than the nuclear force as
Hagelin puts it, you have to be operating FROM the home of all the
laws of nature, pure consciousness, not somewhere in the vicinity.
Bronte writes:
I agree. You can't smash the atom if you smash right next to
Clip from the posted article (Bronte's commments in italitics):
1. Before you learned the language that you now think in, the background of
awareness was there.
So was the essence of my individuality, which is beyond language.
2. Then you learned the word I in
Stu, are you a script writer, a director, a cameraman or what? What is Pushing
Daisies about? Is it a comedy? - Bronte
Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stu wrote:
For anyone who cares, you may want to look at my latest work.
Pushing Daisies
Wednesday night 7c/8 pm ABC.
s.
You
Off-World, you're making some good points, I think. Insults can fall anywhere
on a line continuum, from a 1 to a 10, with sarcasm being a 1. So where do we
draw the line on the line? Well, sarcasm is considered a fair strategy in a
formal debate. Name-calling isn't. Implying that someone's
with the same
sick messages. IMO, of course, with all due respect to yours. - Bronte
authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
At the start of this thread, you quoted Ramana Maharishi on the
value of letting
Here's another email that I wrote way early this afternoon, and I don't see
that it posted. - Bronte
Note: forwarded message attached.
-
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel
and lay it on us.---BeginMessage---
David Spero quoted an article including this snip:
Or the crazy-as-fuck John Birch Society, to which Paul is more than
happy to grant the occasional interview and even speak at their
dinners ...
followed by a line calling Ron Paul a neo-Nazi. In a later post Spero says
Paul is the
] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That flaming Scottsman Off-World wrote:
It is clear what Ron Paul stands for, and that he will never be a
dictator as you are trying to make out. He does not have that sort of
energy, nor the charisma
Interesting article. Bronte's comments in italics. The article states:
1. Before you learned the language that you now think in, the background of
awareness was there.
So was the essence of my individuality, which is beyond language.
2. Then you learned the word I in
Gimminee critters, Ron. Here you go again. You are a nice, sincere guy, but
this proselytizing is a drag. Isn't it an edifice of the ego, that you are
always decrying?
Who are you to tell lurkers on this site that they are not welcome just to
read the posts, and what authority do you
Off-World:
I am saying those things in a totally calm voice...can' t you tell?
A flame is dropping bombs on people. Roughing a guy up verbally for
acting like a dumbass is the enlightened thing to do. An
unenlightened person would be all nice about it at all times. Though
I am not enlightened
Dear DS: Are you responding to Rick Archer or to Ron (Hridaya)? The comments
below don't sound like Rick, and unless he sent you these questions privately,
it isn't him, because such a post from him does not appear on the forum. You
misconstrued me, Bronte Baxter, as being New Morning
That flaming Scottsman Off-World wrote:
It is clear what Ron Paul stands for, and that he will never be a dictator as
you are trying to make out. He does not have that sort of energy, nor the
charisma, to be a dictator. You're fearmongering is laughable, and will go
nowhere. It is a joke
I would say, spiritualizing matter. Making it as perfect and free as the
Infinite itself. How would you answer this question, Suzie?
suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the greatest and most satisfying thing a person can accomplish
in the material, relative world?
Rick wrote:
Gurus are just people who are farther up the mountain, or perhaps sitting on
its summit.
Bronte writes:
If this is all they were, darlin', they wouldn't be intent on wearing crowns,
having us prostrate ourselves at their feet, call on them to marry us, give our
children
This was beautiful, Rick. I disagree with the devotional path and so many of
your beliefs, but there must be something you are doing right to have such
beautiful experiences. I feel the same about Flanegin. I learn from you guys at
the same time as I debate you. My understanding is an
Judy wrote:
I totally agree with you that the notions that the ego
doesn't exist or that enlightenment involves annihilating
one's individual consciousness are outlandish. I just
don't think anyone has been proposing such notions.
Bronte writes:
Okay, Judy. Thanks for clarifying your
Judy wrote:
I wonder if you missed a post I made a week or two ago
about the Everything is perfect just as it is idea, in
response to a post of yours about it. I've reproduced it
below:
Bronte writes:
Yes, Judy, I did miss it, and I'm very glad you re-sent it. It is very
Flanegin wrote:
Yep, from the standpoint of dualistic, relative life, multiple
problems are seen, and must be solved, as they should be, living a
dynamic and responsible life. From the non dual experience of Being
though, even the change is seen and embraced as perfect. The union
of the
Rick Archer contributed:
Repetition aloud of His name is better than praise. Better still is its
faint murmur. But the best is repetition within the mind -- and that is
meditation Better than such broken thought is its steady and continuous
flow like the flow of oil or of a
Yagyax wrote:
Aristotle arrived at the conclusion that life is Bliss (he used
the phrase Being-In-Itself ) on the basis of his own experience, as
does (who's the person you're speaking on behalf of, Byron Katie?)?
But I keep up on modern philosophical topics, and haven't seen one
Mathabrahman wrote:
Everything's perfect, including the desire to make things better.
Here, we could run into a genuine paradox; but we're dealing with
karma and Dharma, areas which are innately unfathomable.
Therefore, even Sages may fall short of expertise on the topic of
what's perfect
And you have zero logic or rationale or ANY argument whatsoever
behind anything you say, except to attack me. Pathetic little man
you are.
OffWorld
Bronte writes:
Uh-oh, Off-World, my dear kundulini wise man, the fire got a little too hot
for you, bro. You broke into A
I've read and heard great stuff about this method. For one thing, it was
used with clinically depressed patients in trials to see how it fared as
therapy compared to antidepressants. Turns out it had equal and similar effects
on brain chemistry!
IMO, this is one of the most
Pretty darn good questions again, New Morning. I think the various experiences
come from our varying expectations. I went to see Amma, got real close to her,
didn't do the hug thing. I was never impressed, felt no dharshan. Yet a friend
of mine swears by her -- the dharshan for him is intense.
Judy wrote:
I think the notion of free will is an artifact
of duality.
Bronte writes:
Wow, Judy. This statement of yours demonstrates that these aren't just
semantic distinctions between us. I assume you are saying that from your
perspective free will does not exist in higher
Judy wrote:
Who here has been claiming the ego doesn't exist?? Who has suggested
enlightenment involves annihilating your individual consciousness? ? I'm
increasingly coming to think, Bronte, that you're defending your position
against a big bunch of straw men.,___
Bronte
Peter wrote:
Ron, unfortuanately you're wasting your breath on
these mala covered samsarins who insist on
individuality and can not recognize the function of
the ego in this belief that somehow realization of
That includes individuality. Poor deluded bhogis.
Bronte:
I would say it's
I replied to this once. Somehow it never posted, so here goes again:
From Judy, quoting Bronte:
To claim that the ego is only a Me is to perceive only its limited
expression. Such limited expression certainly needs dissolving for cosmic
bliss to occur. But the Me only needs to
differs from the others. Thus, semantics enters into the picture,
true..
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
brontebaxter8@ wrote:
I
--- yagyax wrote:
Obviously, the
false I does vanish but this is only one component
of what makes up
a person, which distinguishes one person from
another: MMY is not
SSRS, etc.
-- Peter wrote:
What distinguishes MMY from SSRS are space/time
qualities. Of course these are different
the question of there being individuals or not. Of
course there are individuals!...but some think not.
If individuals didn't exist, there would be no point in having
Heaven on Earth.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, Yagyax. Never saw you
Hey, New Morning. I've been loving your posts on opinions that are 97.9 %
true, rules of engagement for dialoging, etc. Your observations are very
profound to me.
Regarding this question, I'm not sure what you are asking -- this is thorny
stuff to put into words, so abstract -- but
Replying to New Morning's excellent questions (below) on this thread:
It appears that all these people we hold up as enlightened masters wear the
shine off their halos the more we get to know them. I say the reason is our
concept of enlightenment. If all that means to us is that the
Bill wrote:
The soul is a pure reflection of God called the Jivatma, when in the
beginning when it was tempted by Lucifer (maya/avidya) in the Garden
of Eden (pure innocence) it was warned not to eat of the tree of
knowledge of Good and evil or surely it would die (be subject to the wheel of
Bill wrote:
The Divine is a mode of speech designed to shelter us from our frightful
picture of a horrible, wrathful God. However is also shelters us from having to
confront the Being at the heart of the most powerful experiences of deity
found in the western tradition - all-consuming
Christ said I and the Father are One where is the two in that?
They are one but they are also two, as a branch can say I am the tree and
still be a branch. You can experience being one with the Infinite yet an
individual at the same time.
-
Ron wrote:
I am not enlightened and can not say from direct experience - I can only pass
along what 3 people here say in my path- then again, the honesty of the
situation is unless it is known from direct experience, then it is a belief
system- so you have my beliefs presented.
:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
brontebaxter8@ wrote:
Off-World, this is absolutely exciting. I've always wanted to
talk to someone who was having red-hot, metal-melting kundulini on an
almost daily basis. I have so much I want to ask. So here goes, with
inserted questions below
About the fear and emptiness ... what is it that's empty? What is
the fear OF? That you will burn up? I
The fear is of anihilation. It seems like anihilation, like something
else could take over that is not me, but I have come to the point of
facing that very powerful sense, and not
?
authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Judy wrote:
Actually, that the earth is losing its magnetic field
*is* mainstream; see this article on CNN.com from 2003:
http://tinyurl. com/yzfv
[Bronte: The only guidance needed is one's own inner guidance. It's the
nature of the human spirit to wake up.]
Ron:
My comments, coming from my path will mirror that of Ramana Maharishi's
admonisions.
Bronte:
I disagree with almost everything of the philosophy of the
Judy:
Well, to start with, I think I was confused as to
what you meant by spinning. You mean spinning
*in place*, right? If so, isn't it the string it's
suspended by winding up and then unwinding that
causes the weight to stop spinning and change
direction?
Bronte:
The analogy isn't
uns_tressor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bronte:
I've wondered about that point myself, but how about
this angle? If you take a pendalum hanging from a string
and spin it, it goes a while in one direction. Then, to
my
Judy:
And here's one that was just discovered in
Michigan:
http://www.gullmead owfarms.com/
Bronte:
No, that is not a crop circle -- it's a corn maze -- a human-created pattern
in a field that customers are invited to pay a few dollars to come in and
explore, for fun and
Edg:
Bronte - you might find it helpful to google this issue. I'm thinking you
don't understand the difference between the magnetic poles switching and the
ball, that the earth is, suddenly switching the direction of its spinning.
Bronte:
Edg, it appears that you see me as
---Sure, one can get Enlightened without a Guru; likewise, one can
learn how to play the violin without a teacher. (as Borak would
sayNOT !).
Bronte:
Curious, I know lots of people who've taught themselves musical instruments.
-
I see. Okay, I bit. A good one on me.
- Bronte
curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy:
And here's one that was just discovered in
Michigan:
http://www.gullmead owfarms.com
Bronte: Edg, it appears that you see me as stupid.
Edg:
No! Lacking information, er, ya, but ain't nothing to do with
your IQ. I lack tons of information in every field.
Bronte:
It's just that when you question if a person can't see the difference
betweeen two obviously
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
