--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously though - if he says that all that matters is a building
of
the right type, then 'enlightenment' has a relative cause and the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The whole stress explaination isn't what we think it is.
Say more? What is it, then?
It's an intellectual justification for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The whole stress explaination isn't what we think it is.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My point is simply that in organizations where the
students are making regular progress in their spiritual
development, and such progress is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My point is simply that in organizations where the
students are
If you have to ask how people know these things, it really
doesn't speak very well of TM, does it?
Scientific research that this isn't moodmaking?
Some people haven't been trained to distrust their
own experience.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have to ask how people know these things, it really
doesn't speak very well of TM, does it?
Scientific research that this isn't moodmaking?
Some people haven't been trained to distrust their
own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have to ask how people know these things, it really
doesn't speak very well of TM, does it?
Scientific research that this isn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you have to ask how people know these things, it really
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Improved clarity of mind on a daily basis. Improved clarity
of meditation on a daily basis, with longer and longer periods
of samadhi (and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Improved clarity of mind on a daily basis. Improved clarity
of
The ocean can be in the drop but does the drop explain the nature
of the ocean?No difference.The
drop doesn't explain the nature of the ocean as vast, deep, mysterious, the
source of life, as destructive and chaotic, but also warm and compelling. It
doesn't explain the varieties of
- Original Message -
From: TurquoiseB
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 1:08 AM
My point is simply that in organizations where thestudents are
making regular progress in their spiritualdevelopment, and such progress is
easily discernible,no such
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Conceivably someone could become enlightened by eating MAK.
That's really,really rubbish. That's what Mother Meera told me one
day: You don't get enlightened by eating those pills.I answered that
they are not really claiming
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Conceivably someone could become enlightened by eating MAK.
That's really,really rubbish. That's what Mother Meera told me one
day: You don't get
On Aug 5, 2005, at 11:33 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
The ocean can be in the drop but does the drop explain the nature of
the ocean?
No difference.
A drop generally makes bad surfing.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
- Original Message -
From: TurquoiseB
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 5:53 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Donate money for Peace
Palaces
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"Llundrub" [EMAIL PROTECTED]... wrote:
- Origin
--- t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Conceivably someone could become enlightened by
eating MAK.
That's really,really rubbish. That's what Mother
Meera told me one
day: You don't get enlightened by eating those
on 8/6/05 1:46 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 5, 2005, at 11:33 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
The ocean can be in the drop but does the drop explain the nature
of
the ocean?
No difference.
A drop generally makes bad surfing.
Depends how big you are at the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The ocean can be in the drop but does the drop explain the
nature of
the ocean?
No difference.
The drop doesn't explain the nature of the ocean as vast,
deep, mysterious, the source of life, as destructive
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One simply realizes that within everything is emptiness,
clarity, and luminosity. Nothing more and nothing less.
Oh OK, makes sense. Thanks! reminds me of an experience doing tm on
wednesday where I was aware of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Conceivably someone could become enlightened by eating MAK.
That's really,really rubbish. That's what Mother Meera told me one
day: You don't get
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Conceivably someone could become enlightened by eating MAK.
Everything in existance is made up of the
five elements. In their most subtle forms they are colors of
awareness.cool! Thanks for that too. What are the colors and their
relative significance?-It's not so much relative
significance. The colors are the formless or empty aspect of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's already said that he missed this point for a very long time
(need for Vedic architecture).
when did he say that?
In what of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's already said that he missed this point for a very long
time
--- Well, maybe it's just that Maharishi seems to like to put all of
the emphasis on one thing at a time.
In the beginning, it was just do TM; then it was take SCI, and be a
teacher; then it was do the siddhis, then it was do the siddhis in
the dome, then it was Ayurveda, and Jyotish, and now
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Well, maybe it's just that Maharishi seems to like to put all of
the emphasis on one thing at a time.
I'd phrase it differently. He likes to focus his students'
attention on one thing at a time. He uses the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is exactly what I mean. The most important is what vibrations
you fill your homes with - not the buildings. The buildings is only
frames.
While I won't defend vastu, your attitude is wrong as well.
MMY makes hope. 3-4 years ago an old TM-Teacher called me, she was
listening to the Satellite Channel with News from MMY organisations
every day. And one day it was told that a day in June that Year (I
cannot remember the exact day) Heaven of Earth should rise. Pretty
much like what has been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
MMY makes hope.
I would say rather that Maharishi makes *up* hope, and
those who are desperate for hope buy it. Literally.
3-4 years ago an old TM-Teacher called me, she was
listening to the Satellite Channel with
---Well, it is good to doubt everything; that way you don't have to
put your faith in anything; that's ok, I guess.
Many people feel that way about everything these days, not just
Maharishi, but every level of society, religion, government, courts,
every level, is basically full of crap, right?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
---Well, it is good to doubt everything; that way you don't have to
put your faith in anything; that's ok, I guess.
Many people feel that way about everything these days, not just
Maharishi, but every level of
--- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The longer you preserve your faith in Maharishi and
hope
that maybe, maybe,things will work out as predicted
*this
time*, the longer you can keep from having to deal
with that
other possibility -- that your faith has been
misplaced, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I won't defend vastu, your attitude is wrong as well.
Otherwise, we should ignore any
and all physical issues like mold and mildew,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The longer you preserve your faith in Maharishi and
hope
that maybe, maybe,things will work out as predicted
*this
time*, the longer you can keep from having to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's already said that he missed this point for a very long time
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a study for you -- if the founder of a popular
technique of meditation (who promoted it for decades
by saying that it was the fastest
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---Well, it is good to doubt everything; that way you don't have to
put your faith in anything; that's ok, I guess.
Clinging to faith no matter what and rejecting
faith no matter what are both ways to avoid
having to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here's a study for you -- if the founder of a popular
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---Well, it is good to doubt everything; that way you don't have
to
put your faith in anything; that's ok, I guess.
Clinging to faith
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---Well, it is good to doubt everything; that way you don't have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I think I was being given the role of the potato
dumpling in Unc's formulation, actually.
Yes, but since we are one and all :-) ...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MMY makes hope. 3-4 years ago an old TM-Teacher called me, she was
listening to the Satellite Channel with News from MMY
organisations
every day. And one day it was told that a day in June that Year (I
cannot remember
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I was being given the role of the potato
dumpling in Unc's formulation, actually. But if
I don't have to be a *potato* dumpling, it could
be shiksa-kreplach-kishkas. (I can't even say that
*once*.)
Mmm.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's already said that he missed this point for a very long
time
I have been one of those true believers who really trusted every word
that MMY said, because I thought that he always speak the truth, was
honest and lived a life according to what he teach. My fault, because I
forgot that he is a Human Being, not the New Messiah. I could write a
book about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Well, maybe it's just that Maharishi seems to like to put all
of
the emphasis on one thing at a time.
In the beginning, it was just do TM; then it was take SCI, and be
a
teacher; then it was do the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
While I won't defend vastu, your attitude is wrong as well.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think I was being given the role of the potato
dumpling in Unc's formulation, actually. But if
I don't have to be a *potato*
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On my one visit to Paris many years ago, I went with
some friends to the Jewish quarter and was astonished
to hear the residents speaking French with the very
same accent and characteristic intonation. I didn't
realize it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On my one visit to Paris many years ago, I went with
some friends to the Jewish quarter and was astonished
to hear the residents speaking French
On Aug 5, 2005, at 11:48 AM, Jeff Fischer wrote:
Speaks to me of the importance of values and
integrity.
Or as a friend who is an Orthodox Kabbalist pointed out, in order for a
Jewish mystic to attain Union with God, one has to maintain strict
purity and observance of the
If you have already inaugurated the Age of Enlightenment (30 years
ago), Heaven on Earth (20 years ago), and neither of these are exactly
what one would expect, and now Sat Yuga is inaugurated with no noticeable
changes (as yet anyway), what is left to inaugurate.??. Has MMY given
any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If you have already inaugurated the Age of Enlightenment (30 years
ago), Heaven on Earth (20 years ago), and neither of these are
exactly what one would expect, and now Sat Yuga is inaugurated
with
no noticeable
I am curious- How is unfoldment with Dzogchen
non-dual? Not a trick question, I am interested in how the process is
explained to be non-dual, i'e. no perceived movement from 'here' to 'there'
during unfoldment.One simply realizes that within
everything is emptiness, clarity, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Well, maybe it's just that Maharishi seems to like to put all
of
the emphasis on one thing at a time.
I'd phrase it differently.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---Well, it is good to doubt everything; that way you don't have to
put your faith in anything; that's ok, I guess.
Clinging to faith no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Well, maybe it's just that Maharishi seems to like to put all
of
the emphasis on one thing at a time.
In the beginning, it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Well, maybe it's just that Maharishi seems to like to put
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The whole stress explaination isn't what we think it is.
Say more? What is it, then?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The whole stress explaination isn't what we think it is.
Say more? What is it, then?
Uh-OH! stuck my foot in it didn't I ;-)
A
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The whole stress explaination isn't what we think it is.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am curious- How is unfoldment with Dzogchen non-dual? Not a trick
question, I am interested in how the process is explained to be non-
dual, i'e. no perceived movement from 'here' to 'there' during
unfoldment.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's a good expalination of maya but it can only make sense at a
point of recognition, before that a finite amount of stress that is
released makes sense. But I don't think that's how it really is.
I agree --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A dualistic explaination to satisfy a mind stuck in duality. Let me
think about it some. Something is only stressful when it overshadows
being. How can the ocean be compressed into a drop... it's a circular
argument it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's a good expalination of maya but it can only make sense at a
point of recognition, before that a finite amount of stress that is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The longer you preserve your faith in Maharishi and
hope
that maybe, maybe,things will work out as predicted
*this
time*, the longer you can keep from having to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrfishey2001
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A dualistic explaination to satisfy a mind stuck in duality. Let me
think about it some. Something is only stressful when it
One simply realizes that within
everything is emptiness, clarity, and luminosity. Nothing more and nothing
less.Oh OK, makes sense. Thanks! reminds me of an experience doing tm on
wednesday where I was aware of these intense yellows and golds coming
into focus, suddenly resolving
That's a good expalination of maya but it can only make sense at
a point of recognition, before that a finite amount of stress that
is released makes sense. But I don't think that's how it really
is. I agree -- there is not really "Being" and "stress," for how
could there be anything
"A dualistic explaination to satisfy a mind stuck in duality. Let
me think about it some. Something is only stressful when it
overshadows being. How can the ocean be compressed into a drop... it's a
circular argument it doesn't compute ..."
JohnY
The ocean can be in the drop but does
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A dualistic explaination to satisfy a mind stuck in duality. Let
me
think about it some. Something is only stressful when it
overshadows
being. How can the ocean be compressed into a drop... it's a
circular
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A dualistic explaination to satisfy a mind stuck in duality. Let me
think about it some. Something is only stressful when it overshadows
being. How can the ocean be compressed into a drop... it's a
circular
argument
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A dualistic explaination to satisfy a mind stuck in duality. Let
me
think about it some. Something is only stressful when it
overshadows
being. How can the ocean be compressed into a drop... it's a
circular
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Global Country of World Peace
- FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE -
_
, this week launched a program for the reconstruction of the entire world.
Everywhere, we find that people are not
The subject heading chosen by this poster, Donate Money for Peace
Palaces is interesting, because in the press release there is not a
single
request for donations. Not one. I guess people see and read what they
want
to read.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The subject heading chosen by this poster, Donate Money for Peace
Palaces is interesting, because in the press release there is not a
single
request for donations. Not one. I guess people see and read what they
want
to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The subject heading chosen by this poster, Donate Money for Peace
Palaces is interesting, because in the press release there is not a
single
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So although you are both correct that the specific phrase
donate money for peace palaces is not in the press
release, that is its message. The TMO is not going to put
a penny into these buildings. It's going to get
Does anyone actually read this and realize how it
sounds?JohnY
It sounds alot like the Book of David and all other old
and new covenential prophecies which foretell doom and gloom and the
restructuring of life in accordance with God's will as shewn by his Chosen One
the Lord of Zion, the
- Original Message -
From: feste37
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:44 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Donate money for Peace
Palaces
The subject heading chosen by this poster, "Donate Money for Peace
Palaces" is interestin
In Scientology we have something called an "obnosis" (observing the
obvious) drill. When you look at something, you have to tell the other
person what you see. "I see her left ear" will be flunked when what is
really "seen" is an ear lobe due to the fact that the "rest of the ear"
is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's all Maya, my Friend.
Then what's the problem w/ wasps and rats?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo!
Well, I read it - and once more I draw a comparison between Guru Devs
teaching and his clerks teaching. And once more I feel more and more
close to the Veda and a more and more distance to MMY. These press
releases are just bizarre.
Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000
Yup that's how it has been working for some time. Ayurvedic
Centers/hotels, Age of E Centers, World Peace Assembly Buildings,
and the bought land to build such. Veda Land in FL - just or in the
process of being sold, old hotels, skyscrappers in NYC, land for
highways in TX. The only ones that have
It's all Maya, my Friend. Then what's
the problem w/ wasps and rats?The problem is
me. I want to feel good about myself and not have to kill things. I don't care to be the judge, jury and executioner. Call me
a pussy, but I just don't care to be the judge of whether something is right
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 9:47 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Donate money for Peace
Palaces
Well, I read it - and once more I draw a comparison between
Guru Devs teaching and his clerks teaching. And once more I feel more and
more close to the Veda and a more and more distance
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Global Country of World Peace
- FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE -
_
, this week launched a program for
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo