Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
george_deforest wrote: Their commitment is to Save N. America from some terrible event or series of events. Even eliminating the stress of earthquakes ... We had an earthquake in Berkeley, California today (Wednesday) around 7:15 PM local time. i definitely felt the shake, centered only about a mile from my apt. The quake measured 3.7 on the scale -- not enough to do real damage. more details: http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Quakes/nc51177042.htm Did you feel the one last night (the 22nd) at 10:47 PM also in the same spot and same magnitude? The Hayward fault seems to be waking up. Oh boy!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: george_deforest wrote: Their commitment is to Save N. America from some terrible event or series of events. Even eliminating the stress of earthquakes ... We had an earthquake in Berkeley, California today (Wednesday) around 7:15 PM local time. i definitely felt the shake, centered only about a mile from my apt. The quake measured 3.7 on the scale -- not enough to do real damage. more details: http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Quakes/nc51177042.htm Did you feel the one last night (the 22nd) at 10:47 PM also in the same spot and same magnitude? The Hayward fault seems to be waking up. Oh boy! i missed the one yesterday, (xmas shopping the new mall in SF), and would you believe, another one this morning too: 3.7 on Wed, 3.7 Friday eve, and 3.5 Sat morn (today) all from the same spot...Go Hayward Fault! much better three little quakes than one big one. my sister was almost hit in the last big one, when the section of freeway came crashing down, she was driving more or less right there right then! http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Quakes/quakes.big.htm
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info earth quakes small ones R OK, bring on lots of small1's
lots many small ones release the stress in a not to destructive manor they are relieving the bigger stresses hopefully . They are the good news, as are the Pundits doing there jobs.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: george_deforest wrote: Their commitment is to Save N. America from some terrible event or series of events. Even eliminating the stress of earthquakes ... We had an earthquake in Berkeley, California today (Wednesday) around 7:15 PM local time. i definitely felt the shake, centered only about a mile from my apt. The quake measured 3.7 on the scale -- not enough to do real damage. more details: http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Quakes/nc51177042.htm Did you feel the one last night (the 22nd) at 10:47 PM also in the same spot and same magnitude? The Hayward fault seems to be waking up. Oh boy! i missed the one yesterday, (xmas shopping the new mall in SF), and would you believe, another one this morning too: 3.7 on Wed, 3.7 Friday eve, and 3.5 Sat morn (today) all from the same spot...Go Hayward Fault! much better three little quakes than one big one. my sister was almost hit in the last big one, when the section of freeway came crashing down, she was driving more or less right there right then! http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Quakes/quakes.big.htm * Yeah, well, we're just as quaky here in SoCal as you are up there -- note the 319 quakes in the last week on this map: http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/recenteqs/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
Their commitment is to Save N. America from some terrible event or series of events. Even eliminating the stress of earthquakes ... We had an earthquake in Berkeley, California today (Wednesday) around 7:15 PM local time. i definitely felt the shake, centered only about a mile from my apt. The quake measured 3.7 on the scale -- not enough to do real damage. more details: http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Quakes/nc51177042.htm
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info earth quakes losts of small ones OK
Lots of minor ones frequently do relieve there built up stresses so larger ones may not then occur etc.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
george_deforest wrote: Their commitment is to Save N. America from some terrible event or series of events. Even eliminating the stress of earthquakes ... We had an earthquake in Berkeley, California today (Wednesday) around 7:15 PM local time. i definitely felt the shake, centered only about a mile from my apt. The quake measured 3.7 on the scale -- not enough to do real damage. more details: http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Quakes/nc51177042.htm I noticed it rolled quite a bit longer than the one we had a few months back. I'm about 15 miles from the epicenter.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: george_deforest wrote: Their commitment is to Save N. America from some terrible event or series of events. Even eliminating the stress of earthquakes ... We had an earthquake in Berkeley, California today (Wednesday) around 7:15 PM local time. i definitely felt the shake, centered only about a mile from my apt. The quake measured 3.7 on the scale -- not enough to do real damage. more details: http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Quakes/nc51177042.htm I noticed it rolled quite a bit longer than the one we had a few months back. I'm about 15 miles from the epicenter. I didn't feel it in Santa Clara, but can sometimes feel the ones from the Hayward fault here.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
jstein wrote: Dance, Barry, dance! It's all about Barry, isn't it?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:49 AM, jim_flanegin wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see. Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both the Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to TM, Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom in Austria and the Netherlands. Regarding the Dalai Lama: From Questions Pertaining to Tibet (1969-1972)-- http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/70146.pdf During the first Nixon administration (19691972), the U.S. Government continued its decade-long support of the Dalai Lama and his followers, including political action, propaganda, and paramilitary activity... Funds also were provided to the Dalai Lama for his propaganda efforts ...This operation began during the second Eisenhower administration(19571961) and continued through the Kennedy and Johnson administrations... The total cost of the Tibetan program ...was approximately $2.5 million per year with $500,000 of that figure for non-guerrilla political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. ...CIA Tibetan activities, utilizing followers of the Dalai Lama, have included in addition to guerrilla support a program of political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. Interesting that Maharishi claims the CIA opposes him, but for Tibetan Buddhists, the CIA was an ally. I imagine that there is still active espionage going on or it is so controversial there will be some time till it is released. It's not surprising that any radical religious zealot would be a target of CIA activities--esp. one bent on world domination like M. re: world domination- well, you gotta start somewhere...:-) Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
On Dec 14, 2006, at 3:04 AM, Rory Goff wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:49 AM, jim_flanegin wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see. Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both the Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to TM, Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom in Austria and the Netherlands. Regarding the Dalai Lama: From Questions Pertaining to Tibet (1969-1972)-- http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/70146.pdf During the first Nixon administration (1969–1972), the U.S. Government continued its decade-long support of the Dalai Lama and his followers, including political action, propaganda, and paramilitary activity... Funds also were provided to the Dalai Lama for his propaganda efforts ...This operation began during the second Eisenhower administration(1957–1961) and continued through the Kennedy and Johnson administrations... The total cost of the Tibetan program ...was approximately $2.5 million per year with $500,000 of that figure for non-guerrilla political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. ...CIA Tibetan activities, utilizing followers of the Dalai Lama, have included in addition to guerrilla support a program of political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. Interesting that Maharishi claims the CIA opposes him, but for Tibetan Buddhists, the CIA was an ally. I imagine that there is still active espionage going on or it is so controversial there will be some time till it is released. It's not surprising that any radical religious zealot would be a target of CIA activities--esp. one bent on world domination like M. re: world domination- well, you gotta start somewhere...:-) Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm The Trimondi's are Opus Dei fronts and were originally deployed by the then head of the inquisition, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger--now known as Pope Benedict XVI. They specialize in spreading disinformation regarding Tibetan Buddhism. Some of it is pretty hilarious. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm Hi Rory, Thanks- looks interesting. Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 14, 2006, at 3:04 AM, Rory Goff wrote: snip-- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm The Trimondi's are Opus Dei fronts and were originally deployed by the then head of the inquisition, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger--now known as Pope Benedict XVI. They specialize in spreading disinformation regarding Tibetan Buddhism. Some of it is pretty hilarious. Now *that's* a little one sided, don't you think? Accepting much of the drivel written about Maharishi at face value, yet when solid facts are presented for the *greater* transgressions regarding Tibetan Buddhism, you blithely explain them away as 'disinformation'. How does that work?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm Hi Rory, Thanks- looks interesting. Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-) Jim, with all due respect, I don't think you're fooling anyone. This has nothing to do with Tibetan Buddhism *or* your pretend claim that some people here are... uh...TB TBs. It's all about having made a fool of yourself a couple of days ago by posting some *really* stupid stuff, and about the fact that you're still pissed with yourself about having done that. I don't think it's helping to convince anyone here that you have achieved any kind of realization for you to act like an obsessed fuck. In fact, I suspect it's helping to convince them that you and realization are not quite on the friendly terms you have been hinting you are. This is just a suggestion. You can keep on trying to dig up and post as much dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism as you like. He ain't my teacher, and it's not my tradition, so it's not like it affects me one way or another. But I really do think you're off the deep end on this one, Jim, 'way out in the Injured Ego Gotta Get Revenge Zone, and that rarely works out the way you think it will when you're caught up in the middle of the obsession. Signing off now...you do what you think is right. But if you decide to keep this stuff up and it winds up comin' back on ya in ways you didn't foresee, don't say I didn't try to warn you.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) What?! I thought that was the agenda for the Jews and the homosexuals, or maybe it was Jewish homosexuals. Glad to hear that others are also with the program, though. Those on the front lines will surely appreciate the help. :) Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm Hi Rory, Thanks- looks interesting. Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-) Jim, with all due respect, I don't think you're fooling anyone. This has nothing to do with Tibetan Buddhism *or* your pretend claim that some people here are... uh...TB TBs. It's all about having made a fool of yourself a couple of days ago by posting some *really* stupid stuff, and about the fact that you're still pissed with yourself about having done that. And boy, Barry should know, because he does this all the time: says something utterly idiotic, then spends the next few days attacking everyone in sight in an attempt to salvage his bruised ego and divert attention from his embarrassing goof. It's absolutely fascinating to watch Barry and Vaj's reactions to being given a taste of their own medicine, totally oblivious to what their behavior reveals about their own character, completely blind to their massive hypocrisy. I don't think it's helping to convince anyone here that you have achieved any kind of realization for you to act like an obsessed fuck. In fact, I suspect it's helping to convince them that you and realization are not quite on the friendly terms you have been hinting you are. Says Barry hopefully... This is just a suggestion. Oh, super, now that Barry has told us all how we are to think about Jim, Barry's going to help him figure out how to restore the credibility Barry has been doing his level best to try to destroy. You can keep on trying to dig up and post as much dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism as you like. I'm sure Jim is *so* grateful that Barry has condescended to give him permission. He ain't my teacher, and it's not my tradition, so it's not like it affects me one way or another. And as we all know, *nothing* ever affects Barry. He's attacking Jim here out of the purest goodness of his compassionate heart, not because his little toesies got stepped on. But I really do think you're off the deep end on this one, Jim, 'way out in the Injured Ego Gotta Get Revenge Zone, and that rarely works out the way you think it will when you're caught up in the middle of the obsession. As Barry knows from *very* long personal experience, of course. Signing off now...you do what you think is right. But if you decide to keep this stuff up and it winds up comin' back on ya in ways you didn't foresee, don't say I didn't try to warn you. ROTFL!! Jeez, this is just hilarious. Dance, Barry, dance!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm Hi Rory, Thanks- looks interesting. Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-) Jim, with all due respect, I don't think you're fooling anyone. This has nothing to do with Tibetan Buddhism *or* your pretend claim that some people here are... uh...TB TBs. It's all about having made a fool of yourself a couple of days ago by posting some *really* stupid stuff, and about the fact that you're still pissed with yourself about having done that. And boy, Barry should know, because he does this all the time: says something utterly idiotic, then spends the next few days attacking everyone in sight in an attempt to salvage his bruised ego and divert attention from his embarrassing goof. It's absolutely fascinating to watch Barry and Vaj's reactions to being given a taste of their own medicine, totally oblivious to what their behavior reveals about their own character, completely blind to their massive hypocrisy. I don't think it's helping to convince anyone here that you have achieved any kind of realization for you to act like an obsessed fuck. In fact, I suspect it's helping to convince them that you and realization are not quite on the friendly terms you have been hinting you are. Says Barry hopefully... This is just a suggestion. Oh, super, now that Barry has told us all how we are to think about Jim, Barry's going to help him figure out how to restore the credibility Barry has been doing his level best to try to destroy. You can keep on trying to dig up and post as much dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism as you like. I'm sure Jim is *so* grateful that Barry has condescended to give him permission. He ain't my teacher, and it's not my tradition, so it's not like it affects me one way or another. And as we all know, *nothing* ever affects Barry. He's attacking Jim here out of the purest goodness of his compassionate heart, not because his little toesies got stepped on. But I really do think you're off the deep end on this one, Jim, 'way out in the Injured Ego Gotta Get Revenge Zone, and that rarely works out the way you think it will when you're caught up in the middle of the obsession. As Barry knows from *very* long personal experience, of course. Signing off now...you do what you think is right. But if you decide to keep this stuff up and it winds up comin' back on ya in ways you didn't foresee, don't say I didn't try to warn you. ROTFL!! Jeez, this is just hilarious. Dance, Barry, dance! Dancing naked...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) What?! I thought that was the agenda for the Jews and the homosexuals, or maybe it was Jewish homosexuals. Glad to hear that others are also with the program, though. Those on the front lines will surely appreciate the help. :) Actually, Sal, this theory comes from the folks at MICROSOFT, who really *are* set on world domination. It's their reaction to the release, one April day a few years ago, of a competitor to Windoze, Yellow Hat GNU/Linux: http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=03/03/23/213251 :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
On Dec 14, 2006, at 10:34 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: Actually, Sal, this theory comes from the folks at MICROSOFT, who really *are* set on world domination. Really? I didn't know Bill Gates was Jewish. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm Hi Rory, Thanks- looks interesting. Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-) Jim, with all due respect, I don't think you're fooling anyone. This is just a suggestion. You can keep on trying to dig up and post as much dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism as you like. Hi, Actually it was *Rory* who dug up and posted the last bit of dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism, without any prompting from me I should add. (Even taking the paradox of Brahman into account, he and I continue to operate as seperate heads on the same body.) :-) Anyway, you reminded me. So here's more dirt: From 10-17-1994 Best-selling Buddhist author accused of sexual abuse www.well.com/conf/media/SF_Free_Press/nov11/guru.html $10 million civil suit filed in Santa Cruz by a woman who says Sogyal Rinpoche, author of the Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, coerced her into an intimate relationship By Don Lattin Special to the Free Press SAN FRANCISCO -- a group of American Buddhist women have launched a campaign to expose the alleged sexual misconduct of a prominent Tibetan lama and best-selling author. Sogyal Rinpoche, author of the Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, is accused of physical, mental and sexual abuse in a $10 million civil suit filed last week in Santa Cruz County Superior Court. According to the lawsuit, an anonymous woman identified only as Janice Doe came to Rinpoche for spiritual guidance last year at a retreat sponsored by the Rigpa Fellowship meditation center in Santa Cruz, but was coerced into an intimate relationship with the Tibetan guru. Sogyal claimed (she) would be strengthened and healed by having sex with him and that to be hit by a lama was a blessing, the lawsuit states. The suit -- which accuses Rinpoche of fraud, assault and battery, infliction of emotional distress and breach of fiduciary duty -- also charges that the Tibetan lama has seduced many other female students for his own sexual gratification. Sandra Pawula, spokeswoman for the Rigpa Fellowship of Santa Cruz, one of many meditation centers in the United States, Europe and Australia, declined to comment about the allegations, but said that Rinpoche is not married and does not claim to be a celibate monk. Rinpoche, who lives abroad, could not be reached for comment. The lawsuit follows a letter-writing campaign to the Dalai Lama by American women concerned about alleged sexual exploitation by Rinpoche and several lesser-known Tibetan lamas. What some of these students have experienced is terrible and most unfortunate, said Tenzin Geyche Tethong, the Dharamsala-based secretary to the Dalai Lama. In a letter sent earlier this year to one of the women, Tethong said Tibetan Buddhist leaders have been aware of these (allegations) for some years now. Jack Kornfield, founder of Spirit Rock Meditation Center in Marin County, was among a group of two dozen Western teachers who discussed the sexual misconduct of Buddhist teachers with the Dalai Lama last year in India. According to Kornfield, the Tibetan Buddhist leader told the Americans to always let people know when things are wrong. Put it in the newspapers if you must do so. Another woman allegedly abused by Rinpoche, Victoria Barlow of New York City, said she is disgusted by the way the Tibetans have manipulated the reverence Westerners have for the Buddhist path. Barlow, 40, said she first met Rinpoche in the mid-1970s, when she was 21, and that she was sexually exploited by him during meditation retreats in New York and Berkeley. I went to an apartment to see a highly esteemed lama and discuss religion, she said in an interview with the Free Press. He opened the door without a shirt on and with a beer in his hand. Once they were on the sofa, Barlow said, the Tibetan lunged at me with sloppy kisses and groping. I thought I should take it as the deepest compliment that he was interested and basically surrender to him, she said. Sources say the Tibetan Buddhists were trying to handle this issue within their community but decided, especially after the Dalai Lama made the comment about going to the press, to go public now. The Dalai Lama has known about this for years and done nothing. There is a real code of secrecy and silence, said Barlow. http://www.anandainfo.com/tantric_robes.html An excerpt from The Emperor's Tantric Robes This article appeared in the Winter 1996 issue of Tricycle magazine; An Interview with June Campbell on Codes of
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm Hi Rory, Thanks- looks interesting. Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-) Jim, with all due respect, I don't think you're fooling anyone. This is just a suggestion. You can keep on trying to dig up and post as much dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism as you like. Hi, Actually it was *Rory* who dug up and posted the last bit of dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism, without any prompting from me I should add. (Even taking the paradox of Brahman into account, he and I continue to operate as seperate heads on the same body.) :-) Anyway, you reminded me. So here's more dirt: From 10-17-1994 Best-selling Buddhist author accused of sexual abuse www.well.com/conf/media/SF_Free_Press/nov11/guru.html $10 million civil suit filed in Santa Cruz by a woman who says Sogyal Rinpoche, author of the Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, coerced her into an intimate relationship By Don Lattin Special to the Free Press SAN FRANCISCO -- a group of American Buddhist women have launched a campaign to expose the alleged sexual misconduct of a prominent Tibetan lama and best-selling author. Sogyal Rinpoche, author of the Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, is accused of physical, mental and sexual abuse in a $10 million civil suit filed last week in Santa Cruz County Superior Court. According to the lawsuit, an anonymous woman identified only as Janice Doe came to Rinpoche for spiritual guidance last year at a retreat sponsored by the Rigpa Fellowship meditation center in Santa Cruz, but was coerced into an intimate relationship with the Tibetan guru. Sogyal claimed (she) would be strengthened and healed by having sex with him and that to be hit by a lama was a blessing, the lawsuit states. The suit -- which accuses Rinpoche of fraud, assault and battery, infliction of emotional distress and breach of fiduciary duty -- also charges that the Tibetan lama has seduced many other female students for his own sexual gratification. Sandra Pawula, spokeswoman for the Rigpa Fellowship of Santa Cruz, one of many meditation centers in the United States, Europe and Australia, declined to comment about the allegations, but said that Rinpoche is not married and does not claim to be a celibate monk. Rinpoche, who lives abroad, could not be reached for comment. The lawsuit follows a letter-writing campaign to the Dalai Lama by American women concerned about alleged sexual exploitation by Rinpoche and several lesser-known Tibetan lamas. What some of these students have experienced is terrible and most unfortunate, said Tenzin Geyche Tethong, the Dharamsala-based secretary to the Dalai Lama. In a letter sent earlier this year to one of the women, Tethong said Tibetan Buddhist leaders have been aware of these (allegations) for some years now. Jack Kornfield, founder of Spirit Rock Meditation Center in Marin County, was among a group of two dozen Western teachers who discussed the sexual misconduct of Buddhist teachers with the Dalai Lama last year in India. According to Kornfield, the Tibetan Buddhist leader told the Americans to always let people know when things are wrong. Put it in the newspapers if you must do so. Another woman allegedly abused by Rinpoche, Victoria Barlow of New York City, said she is disgusted by the way the Tibetans have manipulated the reverence Westerners have for the Buddhist path. Barlow, 40, said she first met Rinpoche in the mid-1970s, when she was 21, and that she was sexually exploited by him during meditation retreats in New York and Berkeley. I went to an apartment to see a highly esteemed lama and discuss religion, she said in an interview with the Free Press. He opened the door without a shirt on and with a beer in his hand. Once they were on the sofa, Barlow said, the Tibetan lunged at me with sloppy kisses and groping. I thought I should take it as the deepest compliment that he was interested and basically surrender to him, she said. Sources say the Tibetan Buddhists were trying to handle this issue within their community but decided, especially after the Dalai Lama made the comment about going to the press, to go public now. The Dalai Lama has known about this for years and done nothing. There is a real code of secrecy and silence, said Barlow.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
On Dec 14, 2006, at 12:01 PM, jim_flanegin wrote: Jack Kornfield, founder of Spirit Rock Meditation Center in Marin County, was among a group of two dozen Western teachers who discussed the sexual misconduct of Buddhist teachers with the Dalai Lama last year in India. According to Kornfield, the Tibetan Buddhist leader told the Americans to always let people know when things are wrong. Put it in the newspapers if you must do so. Amen.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You forgot to mention that Tibetan Buddhists are funny-looking: http://www.tibetanculture.org/img/photos/dance.gif Judging from the picture, it sure looks like the Tibetan Buddhists beat the TMO to the punch regarding wearing silly stuff on their heads. I guess those TM Rajas don't look so weird after all? :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm Hi Rory, Thanks- looks interesting. Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-) *lol* Mine is rather similar -- to point out that what we see is what we BE; our sensorium or drama-field out there is essentially a brilliant manifestation of our own consciousness playing through our own physiology -- our own devata-particles -- and there is only One of Us, and We Love All of Us, and so on and so on...:-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm Hi Rory, Thanks- looks interesting. Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-) *lol* Mine is rather similar -- to point out that what we see is what we BE; our sensorium or drama-field out there is essentially a brilliant manifestation of our own consciousness playing through our own physiology -- our own devata-particles -- and there is only One of Us, and We Love All of Us, and so on and so on...:-) I'm *being* good these days! lol! What do you mean by devata- particles, and why do you equate that to the physiology? What do they look like?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
On Dec 14, 2006, at 11:47 AM, jim_flanegin wrote: Judging from the picture, it sure looks like the Tibetan Buddhists beat the TMO to the punch regarding wearing silly stuff on their heads. I guess those TM Rajas don't look so weird after all? :-) Pretty low bar you've set there. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 14, 2006, at 11:47 AM, jim_flanegin wrote: Judging from the picture, it sure looks like the Tibetan Buddhists beat the TMO to the punch regarding wearing silly stuff on their heads. I guess those TM Rajas don't look so weird after all? :-) Pretty low bar you've set there. Sal Bar, belle?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
On Dec 14, 2006, at 12:38 PM, jim_flanegin wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 14, 2006, at 11:47 AM, jim_flanegin wrote: Judging from the picture, it sure looks like the Tibetan Buddhists beat the TMO to the punch regarding wearing silly stuff on their heads. I guess those TM Rajas don't look so weird after all? :-) Pretty low bar you've set there. Sal Bar, belle? Better than a dumbelle, I guess. :)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
Why do you have to be such a fucking idiot? Leave Tibetan Buddhism alone. It is only bothering me, and I am not even part of your stupid conversation. If you guys keep at this shit I will leave the group as I cannot belong to a place of people slandering my religion. A follower of the Dalai lama gave me 20,000 bucks after Katrina to help me. Not one of you silly fuckers helped me for shit. So back the fuck off. - Original Message - From: jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 11:01 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm Hi Rory, Thanks- looks interesting. Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-) Jim, with all due respect, I don't think you're fooling anyone. This is just a suggestion. You can keep on trying to dig up and post as much dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism as you like. Hi, Actually it was *Rory* who dug up and posted the last bit of dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism, without any prompting from me I should add. (Even taking the paradox of Brahman into account, he and I continue to operate as seperate heads on the same body.) :-) Anyway, you reminded me. So here's more dirt: From 10-17-1994 Best-selling Buddhist author accused of sexual abuse www.well.com/conf/media/SF_Free_Press/nov11/guru.html $10 million civil suit filed in Santa Cruz by a woman who says Sogyal Rinpoche, author of the Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, coerced her into an intimate relationship By Don Lattin Special to the Free Press SAN FRANCISCO -- .a group of American Buddhist women have launched a campaign to expose the alleged sexual misconduct of a prominent Tibetan lama and best-selling author. Sogyal Rinpoche, author of the Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, is accused of physical, mental and sexual abuse in a $10 million civil suit filed last week in Santa Cruz County Superior Court. According to the lawsuit, an anonymous woman identified only as Janice Doe came to Rinpoche for spiritual guidance last year at a retreat sponsored by the Rigpa Fellowship meditation center in Santa Cruz, but was coerced into an intimate relationship with the Tibetan guru. Sogyal claimed (she) would be strengthened and healed by having sex with him and that to be hit by a lama was a blessing, the lawsuit states. The suit -- which accuses Rinpoche of fraud, assault and battery, infliction of emotional distress and breach of fiduciary duty -- also charges that the Tibetan lama has seduced many other female students for his own sexual gratification. Sandra Pawula, spokeswoman for the Rigpa Fellowship of Santa Cruz, one of many meditation centers in the United States, Europe and Australia, declined to comment about the allegations, but said that Rinpoche is not married and does not claim to be a celibate monk. Rinpoche, who lives abroad, could not be reached for comment. The lawsuit follows a letter-writing campaign to the Dalai Lama by American women concerned about alleged sexual exploitation by Rinpoche and several lesser-known Tibetan lamas. What some of these students have experienced is terrible and most unfortunate, said Tenzin Geyche Tethong, the Dharamsala-based secretary to the Dalai Lama. In a letter sent earlier this year to one of the women, Tethong said Tibetan Buddhist leaders have been aware of these (allegations) for some years now. Jack Kornfield, founder of Spirit Rock Meditation Center in Marin County, was among a group of two dozen Western teachers who discussed the sexual misconduct of Buddhist teachers with the Dalai Lama last year in India. According to Kornfield, the Tibetan Buddhist leader told the Americans to always let people know when things are wrong. Put it in the newspapers if you must do so. Another woman allegedly abused by Rinpoche, Victoria Barlow of New York City, said she is disgusted by the way the Tibetans have manipulated the reverence Westerners have for the Buddhist path. Barlow, 40, said she first met Rinpoche in the mid-1970s, when she was 21, and that she was sexually exploited by him during meditation retreats in New York and Berkeley. I went to an apartment to see a highly esteemed lama and discuss religion, she said in an interview with the Free Press. He opened the door without a shirt on and with a beer in his hand. Once they were on the sofa, Barlow said, the Tibetan lunged at me with sloppy kisses and groping. I thought I should take it as the deepest compliment that he was interested and basically surrender to him
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-) R: *lol* Mine is rather similar -- to point out that what we see is what we BE; our sensorium or drama-field out there is essentially a brilliant manifestation of our own consciousness playing through our own physiology -- our own devata-particles -- and there is only One of Us, and We Love All of Us, and so on and so on...:-) J: I'm *being* good these days! lol! R: Yes, I am! :-) J:What do you mean by devata- particles, and why do you equate that to the physiology? What do they look like? They may appear as point-selves -- localizations or collapsings of All-that-IS into intense bliss-points or I-selves -- which upon closer look may resolve into specific classical devata-forms, angel- forms, god-forms, demon-forms, whatever. They are each and all upon heart-embrace nothing other than Us. We are continually creating them, sustaining them, and reabsorbing them. I equate them to the physiology because that is what they are -- the intermediaries through which consciousness (Rishi) creates creation (Chandas). Upon closer look and fuller heart-embrace, there is nothing other than Us... Your glass-houses analogy is a good one, for as the intellect clarifies and clarifies, it gradually melts into translucence and transparency, becomes more and more glass-like, more and more heart- filled, surrenders its I-thou distinctions more and more, until as always has ever been, only our Self remains :-) Anything we see out there is a projection of our consciousness through our physiology; as these devata-particles clarify, the out there must of necessity also clarify. The world is as we are, and our devata-particles are those portions of Ourself which both separate Us from the world, and reunite Us All... A rough analogy would be our consciousness as the projector-light, the devatas as the film, and the out there as the movie-screen. However, in actuality, paying attention to the light interacting with the film actually clarifies the film so that it and the screen are also seen to be nothing but light, and actually not even that -- nothing but Us, the Unqualified, emptiful, pure potential to BE :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 14, 2006, at 12:38 PM, jim_flanegin wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote: On Dec 14, 2006, at 11:47 AM, jim_flanegin wrote: Judging from the picture, it sure looks like the Tibetan Buddhists beat the TMO to the punch regarding wearing silly stuff on their heads. I guess those TM Rajas don't look so weird after all? :- ) Pretty low bar you've set there. Sal Bar, belle? Better than a dumbelle, I guess. :) Bellissimo! :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do you have to be such a fucking idiot? Leave Tibetan Buddhism alone. It is only bothering me, and I am not even part of your stupid conversation. If you guys keep at this shit I will leave the group as I cannot belong to a place of people slandering my religion. A follower of the Dalai lama gave me 20,000 bucks after Katrina to help me. Not one of you silly fuckers helped me for shit. So back the fuck off. Geez, who pissed in *your* coffee this morning??
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-) R: *lol* Mine is rather similar -- to point out that what we see is what we BE; our sensorium or drama-field out there is essentially a brilliant manifestation of our own consciousness playing through our own physiology -- our own devata-particles -- and there is only One of Us, and We Love All of Us, and so on and so on...:-) J: I'm *being* good these days! lol! R: Yes, I am! :-) J:What do you mean by devata- particles, and why do you equate that to the physiology? What do they look like? They may appear as point-selves -- localizations or collapsings of All-that-IS into intense bliss-points or I-selves -- which upon closer look may resolve into specific classical devata-forms, angel- forms, god-forms, demon-forms, whatever. They are each and all upon heart-embrace nothing other than Us. We are continually creating them, sustaining them, and reabsorbing them. I equate them to the physiology because that is what they are -- the intermediaries through which consciousness (Rishi) creates creation (Chandas). Upon closer look and fuller heart-embrace, there is nothing other than Us... Your glass-houses analogy is a good one, for as the intellect clarifies and clarifies, it gradually melts into translucence and transparency, becomes more and more glass-like, more and more heart- filled, surrenders its I-thou distinctions more and more, until as always has ever been, only our Self remains :-) Anything we see out there is a projection of our consciousness through our physiology; as these devata-particles clarify, the out there must of necessity also clarify. The world is as we are, and our devata-particles are those portions of Ourself which both separate Us from the world, and reunite Us All... A rough analogy would be our consciousness as the projector-light, the devatas as the film, and the out there as the movie-screen. However, in actuality, paying attention to the light interacting with the film actually clarifies the film so that it and the screen are also seen to be nothing but light, and actually not even that -- nothing but Us, the Unqualified, emptiful, pure potential to BE :-) Thank you for this- I am familiar with all of the experiential dynamics you are describing here, but still don't get the context of the devata-particles. Are they beings that become visible within the localized body (Jim's two arms, legs, etc.), when we choose to look for them there, or viewed in our consciousness, though appearing external to ourselves?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do you have to be such a fucking idiot? Why ask why? At this moment I am apparently a fucking idiot. What IS, IS :-) Leave Tibetan Buddhism alone. You are missing the point, I think. MMY, the TMO, Tibetan Buddhism, George Bush, the Dalai Lama -- It is all a perfectly pure unqualified movie-screen of US upon which we project Our various dramas. It is only bothering me, and I am not even part of your stupid conversation. You are now :-) If you guys keep at this shit I will leave the group as I cannot belong to a place of people slandering my religion. Hmmm I think you are now experiencing deep compassion for those (illusory) TM True Believers! A follower of the Dalai lama gave me 20,000 bucks after Katrina to help me. Not one of you silly fuckers helped me for shit. So back the fuck off. I am very happy he gave you 20K! But on the other hand I am very sorry if you feel this silly fucker has not helped you for shit. But on the other hand, are we absolutely sure that this is true? How do we know it to be true? How do we feel when we hold that thought in our bodymind? How would our bodymind feel if it didn't believe this particular thought as the absolute truth? Are various reflections of this statement equally true? You haven't helped me... ? You haven't helped you...? How about if we see that thought as a wounded particle-self, struggling to come back Home, and we give it some loving attention, some help? Love, Light and Laughter to You/Me/All of Us Always...:-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for this- I am familiar with all of the experiential dynamics you are describing here, but still don't get the context of the devata-particles. Are they beings that become visible within the localized body (Jim's two arms, legs, etc.), when we choose to look for them there, or viewed in our consciousness, though appearing external to ourselves? I am not sure I get the distinction ... Is your body not viewed in your consciousness, though appearing external to yourself? :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: Thank you for this- I am familiar with all of the experiential dynamics you are describing here, but still don't get the context of the devata-particles. Are they beings that become visible within the localized body (Jim's two arms, legs, etc.), when we choose to look for them there, or viewed in our consciousness, though appearing external to ourselves? I am not sure I get the distinction ... Is your body not viewed in your consciousness, though appearing external to yourself? :-) It figures. Thanks Rory- Always a pleasure to interact with you!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: Jim, with all due respect, I don't think you're fooling anyone. This has nothing to do with Tibetan Buddhism *or* your pretend claim that some people here are... uh...TB TBs. It's all about having made a fool of yourself a couple of days ago by posting some *really* stupid stuff, and about the fact that you're still pissed with yourself about having done that. I don't think it's helping to convince anyone here that you have achieved any kind of realization for you to act like an obsessed fuck. In fact, I suspect it's helping to convince them that you and realization are not quite on the friendly terms you have been hinting you are. This is just a suggestion. You can keep on trying to dig up and post as much dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism as you like. He ain't my teacher, and it's not my tradition, so it's not like it affects me one way or another. But I really do think you're off the deep end on this one, Jim, 'way out in the Injured Ego Gotta Get Revenge Zone, and that rarely works out the way you think it will when you're caught up in the middle of the obsession. Signing off now...you do what you think is right. But if you decide to keep this stuff up and it winds up comin' back on ya in ways you didn't foresee, don't say I didn't try to warn you. Lol! Quite a script you have going here! Sweet dreams. Thats certainly 1 angre Barry. Now, what is this warning all about, will he send the CIA after you ? LOL
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
Geez, who pissed in *your* coffee this morning?? All you people who have no greater thing to do than sit around and badspeak holy people.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
Fuck it, you're on spam list Jim. Later. Maybe next life I'll read you again. Useless, waste of reading you are. - Original Message - From: jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 2:21 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: Thank you for this- I am familiar with all of the experiential dynamics you are describing here, but still don't get the context of the devata-particles. Are they beings that become visible within the localized body (Jim's two arms, legs, etc.), when we choose to look for them there, or viewed in our consciousness, though appearing external to ourselves? I am not sure I get the distinction ... Is your body not viewed in your consciousness, though appearing external to yourself? :-) It figures. Thanks Rory- Always a pleasure to interact with you! To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do you have to be such a fucking idiot? Leave Tibetan Buddhism alone. It is only bothering me, and I am not even part of your stupid conversation. If you guys keep at this shit I will leave the group as I cannot belong to a place of people slandering my religion. A follower of the Dalai lama gave me 20,000 bucks after Katrina to help me. Not one of you silly fuckers helped me for shit. So back the fuck off. - Original Message - From: jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 11:01 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/Kalachakra/dec.eng..htm Hi Rory, Thanks- looks interesting. Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL neighborhood. :-) Jim, with all due respect, I don't think you're fooling anyone. This is just a suggestion. You can keep on trying to dig up and post as much dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism as you like. Hi, Actually it was *Rory* who dug up and posted the last bit of dirt about the Dalai Lama and about Tibetan Buddhism, without any prompting from me I should add. (Even taking the paradox of Brahman into account, he and I continue to operate as seperate heads on the same body.) :-) Anyway, you reminded me. So here's more dirt: From 10-17-1994 Best-selling Buddhist author accused of sexual abuse www.well.com/conf/media/SF_Free_Press/nov11/guru.html $10 million civil suit filed in Santa Cruz by a woman who says Sogyal Rinpoche, author of the Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, coerced her into an intimate relationship By Don Lattin Special to the Free Press SAN FRANCISCO -- .a group of American Buddhist women have launched a campaign to expose the alleged sexual misconduct of a prominent Tibetan lama and best-selling author. Sogyal Rinpoche, author of the Tibetan Book of Living and Dying, is accused of physical, mental and sexual abuse in a $10 million civil suit filed last week in Santa Cruz County Superior Court. According to the lawsuit, an anonymous woman identified only as Janice Doe came to Rinpoche for spiritual guidance last year at a retreat sponsored by the Rigpa Fellowship meditation center in Santa Cruz, but was coerced into an intimate relationship with the Tibetan guru. Sogyal claimed (she) would be strengthened and healed by having sex with him and that to be hit by a lama was a blessing, the lawsuit states. The suit -- which accuses Rinpoche of fraud, assault and battery, infliction of emotional distress and breach of fiduciary duty -- also charges that the Tibetan lama has seduced many other female students for his own sexual gratification. Sandra Pawula, spokeswoman for the Rigpa Fellowship of Santa Cruz, one of many meditation centers in the United States, Europe and Australia, declined to comment about the allegations, but said that Rinpoche is not married and does not claim to be a celibate monk. Rinpoche, who lives abroad, could not be reached for comment. The lawsuit follows a letter-writing campaign to the Dalai Lama by American women concerned about alleged sexual exploitation by Rinpoche and several lesser-known Tibetan lamas. What some of these students have experienced is terrible and most unfortunate, said Tenzin Geyche Tethong, the Dharamsala-based secretary to the Dalai Lama. In a letter sent earlier this year to one of the women, Tethong said Tibetan Buddhist leaders have been aware of these (allegations) for some years now. Jack Kornfield, founder of Spirit Rock Meditation Center in Marin County, was among a group of two dozen Western teachers who discussed the sexual misconduct of Buddhist teachers with the Dalai Lama last year in India. According to Kornfield, the Tibetan Buddhist leader told the Americans to always let people know when things are wrong. Put it in the newspapers if you must do so. Another woman allegedly abused by Rinpoche, Victoria Barlow of New York City, said she is disgusted by the way the Tibetans have manipulated the reverence Westerners have for the Buddhist path. Barlow, 40, said she first met Rinpoche in the mid-1970s, when she was 21, and that she was sexually exploited by him during meditation retreats in New York and Berkeley. I went to an apartment to see a highly esteemed lama and discuss religion, she said in an interview with the Free Press. He opened the door without a shirt on and with a beer in his hand. Once they were
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Careful now Mr. Flanegin; you could end up with both the CIA and funny looking Tibetans at your door ! How will I tell the difference? ;-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geez, who pissed in *your* coffee this morning?? All you people who have no greater thing to do than sit around and badspeak holy people. One of my faves: Is a bear Catholic?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fuck it, you're on spam list Jim. Later. Maybe next life I'll read you again. Useless, waste of reading you are. *** from NYT Tech columnist 1. From the Desk of David Pogue: Whatever Happened to Online Etiquette? == Dear David, first off i would like to tell you that you are full of and did not research the zune enough to know your facts. The following are incorrect, and not limited to: podcasts, giftcards, looks(which is an oppinion), controls, and content. Also i would like to inform you that on the day of the launch(nov 14) there is a sceduled firmware upgrade which will most likely disband the 3 by 3 rule [which limits songs beamed between Zunes to three playbacks within three days], and the zune marketplace is also to offer video content about one month after launch. In my oppinion you should be fired for wrighting such a biast article in a (somewhat)professional newspaper. Oh and in case you think i work for microsoft or have bad grammar, or something, you should know that im 15! The deeper we sail into the new online world of communications, the sadder I get about its future. I'm OK with criticism, I'm fine with disagreement, I'm perfectly capable of handling angry mail. That's not the issue here (although my teenage correspondent above was, in fact, wrong about every single one of his points). I've even accepted personal attacks as part of the job. I'm a columnist; the heat comes with the kitchen. But what's really stunning is how hostile *ordinary* people are to each other online these days. Slashdot and Digg.com are extremely popular sites for tech fans. Each discussion begins with the presentation of an article or Web page--and then opens up the floor for discussion. Lately, an increasing number of the discussions devolve into name-calling and bickering. Someone might submit, say, this item to Digg: 685 diggs. AWESOME astronomy poem. (posted by MetsFan 3 days ago) Twinkle, twinkle, little star, how I wonder what you are. Up above the world so high, like a diamond in the sky, Twinkle, twinkle, little star, how I wonder what you are. Before long, the people's feedback begins, like this: by baddude on 12/11/06 What's yr problem, moron. You already said it's a star, why would you then wonder what it is. Get a clue, or a life. by neverland2 on 12/11/06 Dugg down as inaccurate. Stars do not twinkle. It's the shifting atmosphere that causes an apparent twinkle. Or were you stoned all through science class? by mrobe on 12/11/06 yo neverland2--It's a poem, idiot. Nobody's claiming that stars twinkle. Ever heard of poetic license? Honestly, the intellectual level of you people is right up there with a gnat's. ..and so on. What's worse is that the concentration of the nasty people increases as the civil ones get fed up and leave. What's going on here? My current theories: * On the Internet, you're anonymous. Since you don't have to face the person you're dumping on, you don't see any reason to display courtesy. * On the Internet, you're anonymous. You worry that your comments might get lost in the shuffle, so you lay it on thick to enhance your noticeability. * The open toxicity is all part of the political climate. We've learned from the Red state-Blue state talking heads that open hostility can pass for meaningful conversation. * Young people who spend lots of time online are, in essence, replacing in-person social interactions with these online exchanges. With so much less experience conversing in the real world, they haven't picked up on the value of treating people civilly. That is, they haven't yet hit the stage of life when getting things like friends, a spouse and a job depend on what kind of person you are. * Many parents haven't been teaching social skills (or haven't been around to teach them) for years, but Web 2.0 is suddenly making it apparent for the first time. (Web 2.0 describes sites like Digg and Slashdot, where the audience itself provides material for the Web site.) I'd give just about anything to hear what 15-year-old Josh's parents would say if they knew how little respect he holds for adults (let alone the English language). Then again, maybe they wouldn't be surprised a bit. The real shame, though, is that the kneejerk everyone else is an idiot tenor is poisoning the potential the Internet once had. People used to dream of a global village, where maybe we can work out our differences, where direct communication might make us realize that we have a lot in common after all, no matter where we live or what our beliefs. But instead of finding common ground, we're finding new ways to spit on the other guy, to push them away. The Internet is making it easier to attack, not to embrace. Maybe as the Internet becomes as predominant as air, somebody
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting David Pogue of NY Times: Maybe as the Internet becomes as predominant as air, somebody will realize that online behavior isn't just an afterthought. Maybe, along with HTML and how to gauge a Web site's credibility, schools and colleges will one day realize that there's something else to teach about the Internet: Civility 101. Here, here!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote: Quoting David Pogue of NY Times: Maybe as the Internet becomes as predominant as air, somebody will realize that online behavior isn't just an afterthought. Maybe, along with HTML and how to gauge a Web site's credibility, schools and colleges will one day realize that there's something else to teach about the Internet: Civility 101. Here, here! What's the difference between hear! hear! and here, here!? :0
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the difference between hear! hear! and here, here!? :0 http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=19980304
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:44:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info The Trimondi's are Opus Dei fronts and were originally deployed by the then head of the inquisition, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger--now known as Pope Benedict XVI. They specialize in spreading disinformation regarding Tibetan Buddhism. Some of it is pretty hilarious. - Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: Thank you for this- I am familiar with all of the experiential dynamics you are describing here, but still don't get the context of the devata-particles. Are they beings that become visible within the localized body (Jim's two arms, legs, etc.), when we choose to look for them there, or viewed in our consciousness, though appearing external to ourselves? I am not sure I get the distinction ... Is your body not viewed in your consciousness, though appearing external to yourself? :-) It figures. Thanks Rory- Always a pleasure to interact with you! My pleasure, Jim! :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
---Thanks for the inside info on the Tibetans! Here's my Tibetan Guru, Lama Wangdu Rinpoche. Somehow, I don't feel he's the type to carry on with sexual abuse...(I've met Sogyal Rinpoche and Kalu Rinpoche. This news about them is surprising). Lama Wangdu: http://www.lamawangdu.org/photos.html In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 nablusos108@ wrote: Careful now Mr. Flanegin; you could end up with both the CIA and funny looking Tibetans at your door ! How will I tell the difference? ;-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote: Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama Tibetan Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-) What?! I thought that was the agenda for the Jews and the homosexuals, or maybe it was Jewish homosexuals. Glad to hear that others are also with the program, though. Those on the front lines will surely appreciate the help. :) Actually, Sal, this theory comes from the folks at MICROSOFT, who really *are* set on world domination. It's their reaction to the release, one April day a few years ago, of a competitor to Windoze, Yellow Hat GNU/Linux: http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=03/03/23/213251 Have you tried Microsoft's distro? http://mslinux.org/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote: This Vaj/llundrup team, what payroll are they on ? Nablus, I notice that you say this from time to time. Do you really believe that there are people on this list that are getting paid by some sort of organization to sow disent and discord? Yes I do. The question is, who pays Nablus to be such an ignorant bigot? Must be Benjamin Creme, because TMers do it for free. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 nablusos108@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote: This Vaj/llundrup team, what payroll are they on ? Nablus, I notice that you say this from time to time. Do you really believe that there are people on this list that are getting paid by some sort of organization to sow disent and discord? Yes I do. The question is, who pays Nablus to be such an ignorant bigot? Must be Benjamin Creme, because TMers do it for free. Thats your claim, and certainly your ignorance. 1 armed american caught on the bridge between Sonnenberg and the Kulm, Maharishis DC3 blown upp on an airport in Switzerland 20 minutes before scheduled takeoff. That and other incidents certainly involved more resources than having a couple of souls exposing their ignorance on FFL. The times are changing.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 nablusos108@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote: This Vaj/llundrup team, what payroll are they on ? Nablus, I notice that you say this from time to time. Do you really believe that there are people on this list that are getting paid by some sort of organization to sow disent and discord? Yes I do. The question is, who pays Nablus to be such an ignorant bigot? Must be Benjamin Creme, because TMers do it for free. Thats your claim, and certainly your ignorance. 1 armed american caught on the bridge between Sonnenberg and the Kulm, Maharishis DC3 blown upp on an airport in Switzerland 20 minutes before scheduled takeoff. That and other incidents certainly involved more resources than having a couple of souls exposing their ignorance on FFL. The times are changing. The times are changing, and yet the insane stay insane. :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thats your claim, and certainly your ignorance. 1 armed american caught on the bridge between Sonnenberg and the Kulm, Maharishis DC3 blown upp on an airport in Switzerland 20 minutes before scheduled takeoff. That and other incidents certainly involved more resources than having a couple of souls exposing their ignorance on FFL. The times are changing. I never heard of these before. Did you have a trustworthy source for these alleged events? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
On Dec 13, 2006, at 9:08 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 nablusos108@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote: This Vaj/llundrup team, what payroll are they on ? Nablus, I notice that you say this from time to time. Do you really believe that there are people on this list that are getting paid by some sort of organization to sow disent and discord? Yes I do. The question is, who pays Nablus to be such an ignorant bigot? Must be Benjamin Creme, because TMers do it for free. Thats your claim, and certainly your ignorance. 1 armed american caught on the bridge between Sonnenberg and the Kulm, Maharishis DC3 blown upp on an airport in Switzerland 20 minutes before scheduled takeoff. That and other incidents certainly involved more resources than having a couple of souls exposing their ignorance on FFL. The times are changing. The times are changing, and yet the insane stay insane. :-) I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thats your claim, and certainly your ignorance. 1 armed american caught on the bridge between Sonnenberg and the Kulm, Maharishis DC3 blown upp on an airport in Switzerland 20 minutes before scheduled takeoff. That and other incidents certainly involved more resources than having a couple of souls exposing their ignorance on FFL. The times are changing. I never heard of these before. Did you have a trustworthy source for these alleged events? I would not post it here if I did not trust the sources. 10 minutes before the bomb went off an asiansounding fellow called the airport and told them to get the pilotes out of the plane. In Seelisberg there where several instances involving armed men, all aborted. Rather quickly afterwards WYMS became responsible for security, with metaldetectors and all that. Many have tried to get rid of Maharishi. As we know without success. Maharishi simply did not show up for the planned events. There most probably will be made atempts on Maitreya also when He starts His open work. Those will also be unsuccessful. Anyone who challenges established truths in a big way, involving many people, could be faced with these energies in some form or another.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see. Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both the Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to TM, Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom in Austria and the Netherlands. Regarding the Dalai Lama: From Questions Pertaining to Tibet (1969-1972)-- http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/70146.pdf During the first Nixon administration (19691972), the U.S. Government continued its decade-long support of the Dalai Lama and his followers, including political action, propaganda, and paramilitary activity... Funds also were provided to the Dalai Lama for his propaganda efforts ...This operation began during the second Eisenhower administration(19571961) and continued through the Kennedy and Johnson administrations... The total cost of the Tibetan program ...was approximately $2.5 million per year with $500,000 of that figure for non-guerrilla political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. ...CIA Tibetan activities, utilizing followers of the Dalai Lama, have included in addition to guerrilla support a program of political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. Interesting that Maharishi claims the CIA opposes him, but for Tibetan Buddhists, the CIA was an ally.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:49 AM, jim_flanegin wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see. Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both the Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to TM, Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom in Austria and the Netherlands. Isn't this the religious party M. backs? If so, no wonder the CIA has their eyes on him! Perhaps the TMO is just a front org for milking the cash-laden untouchables of the west. http://www.proxsa.org/politics/hindutva/partha.html
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snipPerhaps the TMO is just a front org for milking the cash-laden untouchables of the west. Gotta agree with you there- That is certainly one of its attributes; a co-dependent sort of relationship, between those thinking themselves untouchables out of a false sense of humility, their cash, and the TMO on the milking stool! Lol!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see. Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both the Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to TM, Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom in Austria and the Netherlands. Regarding the Dalai Lama: From Questions Pertaining to Tibet (1969-1972)-- http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/70146.pdf During the first Nixon administration (19691972), the U.S. Government continued its decade-long support of the Dalai Lama and his followers, including political action, propaganda, and paramilitary activity... Funds also were provided to the Dalai Lama for his propaganda efforts ...This operation began during the second Eisenhower administration(19571961) and continued through the Kennedy and Johnson administrations... The total cost of the Tibetan program ...was approximately $2.5 million per year with $500,000 of that figure for non-guerrilla political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. ...CIA Tibetan activities, utilizing followers of the Dalai Lama, have included in addition to guerrilla support a program of political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. Interesting that Maharishi claims the CIA opposes him, but for Tibetan Buddhists, the CIA was an ally. Enemy of my enemy... Playing them off against China. And China is STILL an enemy, according to the neocons. The most important long-term reason to invade Iraq was to create military bases there in order to have a friendly place to position American troops in order to bring pressure to bear on China, or so the PNAC white paper, signed off by everybody who was anybody in the first BW administration, says, including Brother Jeb.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusos108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote: --- nablusos108 nablusos108@ wrote: Thats your claim, and certainly your ignorance. 1 armed american caught on the bridge between Sonnenberg and the Kulm, Maharishis DC3 blown upp on an airport in Switzerland 20 minutes before scheduled takeoff. That and other incidents certainly involved more resources than having a couple of souls exposing their ignorance on FFL. The times are changing. I never heard of these before. Did you have a trustworthy source for these alleged events? I would not post it here if I did not trust the sources. 10 minutes before the bomb went off an asiansounding fellow called the airport and told them to get the pilotes out of the plane. In Seelisberg there where several instances involving armed men, all aborted. Rather quickly afterwards WYMS became responsible for security, with metaldetectors and all that. Many have tried to get rid of Maharishi. As we know without success. Maharishi simply did not show up for the planned events. There most probably will be made atempts on Maitreya also when He starts His open work. Those will also be unsuccessful. Anyone who challenges established truths in a big way, involving many people, could be faced with these energies in some form or another. If these incidents happened, they were likely due to spriitual politics back in India, not the actions of theCIA.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:49 AM, jim_flanegin wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see. Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both the Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to TM, Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom in Austria and the Netherlands. Regarding the Dalai Lama: From Questions Pertaining to Tibet (1969-1972)-- http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/70146.pdf During the first Nixon administration (1969–1972), the U.S. Government continued its decade-long support of the Dalai Lama and his followers, including political action, propaganda, and paramilitary activity... Funds also were provided to the Dalai Lama for his propaganda efforts ...This operation began during the second Eisenhower administration(1957–1961) and continued through the Kennedy and Johnson administrations... The total cost of the Tibetan program ...was approximately $2.5 million per year with $500,000 of that figure for non-guerrilla political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. ...CIA Tibetan activities, utilizing followers of the Dalai Lama, have included in addition to guerrilla support a program of political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. Interesting that Maharishi claims the CIA opposes him, but for Tibetan Buddhists, the CIA was an ally. I imagine that there is still active espionage going on or it is so controversial there will be some time till it is released. It's not surprising that any radical religious zealot would be a target of CIA activities--esp. one bent on world domination like M.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:49 AM, jim_flanegin wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see. Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both the Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to TM, Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom in Austria and the Netherlands. Isn't this the religious party M. backs? If so, no wonder the CIA has their eyes on him! Perhaps the TMO is just a front org for milking the cash-laden untouchables of the west. http://www.proxsa.org/politics/hindutva/partha.html Don't think so. The ABP disbanded, but I don't think it joined one of the major parties.Think it merged with another minor party some time ago. http://www.allstates-flag.com/fotw/flags/in%7D.html#abp Ajeya Bharat Party Ajeya Bharat Party has been founded with the pure and pious intention to establish life in happiness, peace, unprecedented prosperity, equality, health, invincibility, and wholeness for all time to come. As an aside, Vasudevananda is with the VHP though it is not affiliated with any specific part and has support from at least some of the BJP. Swaroopananda is anti-VHP and his association with the BJP appears to go up and down Incidentally, Swaroopananda was a close friend of one of the Gandhis, which could explain a lot of the political maneuvering in his favor over Swaroopananda. Here's a fun little news item: Hindu News Today's Headlines Six hurt as followers of two seers clash 2005-02-09 Published by The Hindu Gathered by Press Trust of India ALLAHABAD,FEBRUARY 9: At least six people were injured in a clash between followers of two seers at the Magh Mela area near here, police said on wednesday. Trouble erupted last night when devotees of Dwarka Sharda Peeth Shankaracharya Swaroopananda Saraswati barged into the camp of Jyotishpeeth Badrikashram Pontiff Vasudevananda Saraswati to serve a court order to the latter, Circle Officer Rajesh Yadav, told PTI here. The followers of both camps came to blows and the situation was brought under control only after a police party reached the site and used mild force to quell the mob. Police lodged an FIR on behalf of Swami Vasudevananda accusing Swami Sswaroopananda and his followers of creating disturbance at his camp and assaulting his devotees, Yadav said. Tension has been brewing for some time between the two seers over the issue of control of the Jyotishpeeth Badrikashram, which is at present controlled by Swami Vasudevananda.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As an aside, Vasudevananda is with the VHP though it is not affiliated with any specific part and has support from at least some of the BJP. Swaroopananda is anti-VHP and his association with the BJP appears to go up and down Incidentally, Swaroopananda was a close friend of one of the Gandhis, which could explain a lot of the political maneuvering in his favor over Swaroopananda. should read: over VASUdevananda...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see. Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both the Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to TM, Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom in Austria and the Netherlands. Regarding the Dalai Lama: From Questions Pertaining to Tibet (1969-1972)-- http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/70146.pdf During the first Nixon administration (19691972), the U.S. Government continued its decade-long support of the Dalai Lama and his followers, including political action, propaganda, and paramilitary activity... Funds also were provided to the Dalai Lama for his propaganda efforts ...This operation began during the second Eisenhower administration(19571961) and continued through the Kennedy and Johnson administrations... The total cost of the Tibetan program ...was approximately $2.5 million per year with $500,000 of that figure for non-guerrilla political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. ...CIA Tibetan activities, utilizing followers of the Dalai Lama, have included in addition to guerrilla support a program of political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. Interesting that Maharishi claims the CIA opposes him, but for Tibetan Buddhists, the CIA was an ally. Enemy of my enemy... Playing them off against China. And China is STILL an enemy, according to the neocons. The most important long-term reason to invade Iraq was to create military bases there in order to have a friendly place to position American troops in order to bring pressure to bear on China, or so the PNAC white paper, signed off by everybody who was anybody in the first BW administration, says, including Brother Jeb. I heard oil control as well to China, Europe and Japan.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 13, 2006, at 10:49 AM, jim_flanegin wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see. Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both the Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to TM, Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom in Austria and the Netherlands. Regarding the Dalai Lama: From Questions Pertaining to Tibet (1969-1972)-- http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/70146.pdf During the first Nixon administration (19691972), the U.S. Government continued its decade-long support of the Dalai Lama and his followers, including political action, propaganda, and paramilitary activity... Funds also were provided to the Dalai Lama for his propaganda efforts ...This operation began during the second Eisenhower administration(19571961) and continued through the Kennedy and Johnson administrations... The total cost of the Tibetan program ...was approximately $2.5 million per year with $500,000 of that figure for non-guerrilla political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. ...CIA Tibetan activities, utilizing followers of the Dalai Lama, have included in addition to guerrilla support a program of political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. Interesting that Maharishi claims the CIA opposes him, but for Tibetan Buddhists, the CIA was an ally. I imagine that there is still active espionage going on or it is so controversial there will be some time till it is released. It's not surprising that any radical religious zealot would be a target of CIA activities--esp. one bent on world domination like M. re: world domination- well, you gotta start somewhere...:-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
This sort of guru bashing leads to hell. - Original Message - From: jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:35 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see. Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both the Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to TM, Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom in Austria and the Netherlands. Regarding the Dalai Lama: From Questions Pertaining to Tibet (1969-1972)-- http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/70146.pdf During the first Nixon administration (1969-1972), the U.S. Government continued its decade-long support of the Dalai Lama and his followers, including political action, propaganda, and paramilitary activity... Funds also were provided to the Dalai Lama for his propaganda efforts ...This operation began during the second Eisenhower administration(1957-1961) and continued through the Kennedy and Johnson administrations... The total cost of the Tibetan program ...was approximately $2.5 million per year with $500,000 of that figure for non-guerrilla political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. ...CIA Tibetan activities, utilizing followers of the Dalai Lama, have included in addition to guerrilla support a program of political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. Interesting that Maharishi claims the CIA opposes him, but for Tibetan Buddhists, the CIA was an ally. Enemy of my enemy... Playing them off against China. And China is STILL an enemy, according to the neocons. The most important long-term reason to invade Iraq was to create military bases there in order to have a friendly place to position American troops in order to bring pressure to bear on China, or so the PNAC white paper, signed off by everybody who was anybody in the first BW administration, says, including Brother Jeb. I heard oil control as well to China, Europe and Japan. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This sort of guru bashing leads to hell. Oh, is that where we are? :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
No, that's the result of doubting the source of the path you're on or have been on. To bash the way is to bash oneself. - Original Message - From: jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 4:13 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This sort of guru bashing leads to hell. Oh, is that where we are? :-) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, that's the result of doubting the source of the path you're on or have been on. To bash the way is to bash oneself. Sounds like walking backwards into the future.:-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: I wonder if anyone has ever tried to get the CIA reports on Mahesh via the Freedom of Information Act? That would be interesting to see. Interesting point- Prompted by your remark, I was searching both the Department of State and CIA websites just now for references to TM, Maharishi, and the Dalai Lama. Not much on TM- A couple of references on the State Dept. website regarding relgious freedom in Austria and the Netherlands. Regarding the Dalai Lama: From Questions Pertaining to Tibet (1969-1972)-- http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/70146.pdf During the first Nixon administration (19691972), the U.S. Government continued its decade-long support of the Dalai Lama and his followers, including political action, propaganda, and paramilitary activity... Funds also were provided to the Dalai Lama for his propaganda efforts ...This operation began during the second Eisenhower administration(19571961) and continued through the Kennedy and Johnson administrations... The total cost of the Tibetan program ...was approximately $2.5 million per year with $500,000 of that figure for non-guerrilla political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. ...CIA Tibetan activities, utilizing followers of the Dalai Lama, have included in addition to guerrilla support a program of political, propaganda, and intelligence operations. Interesting that Maharishi claims the CIA opposes him, but for Tibetan Buddhists, the CIA was an ally. Enemy of my enemy... Playing them off against China. And China is STILL an enemy, according to the neocons. The most important long-term reason to invade Iraq was to create military bases there in order to have a friendly place to position American troops in order to bring pressure to bear on China, or so the PNAC white paper, signed off by everybody who was anybody in the first BW administration, says, including Brother Jeb. I heard oil control as well to China, Europe and Japan. That's a mid-term consideration. They were thinking of the needs of a post-oil world...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, that's the result of doubting the source of the path you're on or have been on. To bash the way is to bash oneself. That's a great recipe for being manipulated by cult leaders, if I ever heard one. Sounds like bhakti turned on its head.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You just seem angry to me. -Rather petulant and childish to me.,___ Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds like the Maharishi Gulag program. I think 60 Minutes might want to do a story. Looks a little more like the Warsaw ghetto, confined inside and life going on outside. *** To a householder, the recluse life looks impoverished, but to the recluses like these pundits, householder life is just mud... Bob, you *really* need to see Khyentse Norbu's brilliant film The Cup. Recluses are just people, no matter how those outside the fence want to imagine them as something else. It sounds as if these perticular people long for warm clothes and to be treated as if they were human beings, not imported slave labor. They have my best wishes, because it looks as if they're going to need them...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub llundrub@ wrote: You just seem angry to me. -Rather petulant and childish to me.,___ Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. Obviously something is still bothering you...I remain cheerful and unaffected, same as yesterday. It was very interesting to watch your behavior and Vaj's once the shoe was on the other foot though- Looking a lot like True Believers! :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub llundrub@ wrote: You just seem angry to me. -Rather petulant and childish to me.,___ Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. The other remark I have about my challenges to you and Vaj yesterday was that here you sit day after day after day, challenging much of what TM is and who Maharishi is, and all who respond do so in the context of evaluating TM and Maharishi. So yesterday, understanding that I apply merciless rigor to TM and Maharishi and the TMO with regard to my acceptance or not of them, I decided why should Turq and Vaj be getting a free ride out of all of this? Why not apply the same rigor and scrutiny to their practices as I do to my own? And the results were very eye opening, you True Believers you!...Lol! :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
It sounds as if these perticular people long for warm clothes and to be treated as if they were human beings, not imported slave labor. They have my best wishes, because it looks as if they're going to need them... -If your ultimate usefulness is your consciousness then it's as if you have your whole life ordered to that, just as the whole orange tree is squeezed into containers for your juicy pleasure. If some pundit grows a pair of balls they can escape. It would make a great movie. These persons in the US to bring enlightenment who don't know how to do anything. Great irony. I guess it already was made into movies before like the Garp flick and so onSeems to be a continuum that those who think they're smartest do the stupidest things. God is an irone. Isn't that what someone said recently?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. -Frankly, his lack of understanding, wish to trample my religion (whether he was right or not), and wish to beat Vaj at some game have lowered my estimation of him. I didn't know he was such a putz.This is why people that take pictures with gurus and post them on the internet as if they mean something are not to be trusted. I had thought Jim was a wiser, smarter person. I guess one expects more maturity from others as they all get older.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. -Frankly, his lack of understanding, wish to trample my religion (whether he was right or not), and wish to beat Vaj at some game have lowered my estimation of him. I didn't know he was such a putz.This is why people that take pictures with gurus and post them on the internet as if they mean something are not to be trusted. I had thought Jim was a wiser, smarter person. I guess one expects more maturity from others as they all get older. I am sorry but your sentimental recount of my actions yesterday is incorrect. And I don't get the reference to taking pictures with gurus above. You are not referring to me. You've heard the ewxpression, If you can't take the heat Own it please.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
On Dec 12, 2006, at 10:49 AM, llundrub wrote: It sounds as if these perticular people long for warm clothes and to be treated as if they were human beings, not imported slave labor. They have my best wishes, because it looks as if they're going to need them... -If your ultimate usefulness is your consciousness then it's as if you have your whole life ordered to that, just as the whole orange tree is squeezed into containers for your juicy pleasure. If some pundit grows a pair of balls they can escape. It would make a great movie. These persons in the US to bring enlightenment who don't know how to do anything. Great irony. I guess it already was made into movies before like the Garp flick and so onSeems to be a continuum that those who think they're smartest do the stupidest things. God is an irone. Isn't that what someone said recently? My biggest surprise was that no one seemed concerned that the TMer's cleaning their toilets could do so because they were viewed as untouchables. It also should give some insight into how M. views his western followers. Time to call Amnesty International?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 12, 2006, at 10:49 AM, llundrub wrote: It sounds as if these perticular people long for warm clothes and to be treated as if they were human beings, not imported slave labor. They have my best wishes, because it looks as if they're going to need them... -If your ultimate usefulness is your consciousness then it's as if you have your whole life ordered to that, just as the whole orange tree is squeezed into containers for your juicy pleasure. If some pundit grows a pair of balls they can escape. It would make a great movie. These persons in the US to bring enlightenment who don't know how to do anything. Great irony. I guess it already was made into movies before like the Garp flick and so onSeems to be a continuum that those who think they're smartest do the stupidest things. God is an irone. Isn't that what someone said recently? My biggest surprise was that no one seemed concerned that the TMer's cleaning their toilets could do so because they were viewed as untouchables. That's how you interpret Some western staff men are allowed in daily to clean the things reserved for 'dalits' - untouchable?? It also should give some insight into how M. views his western followers. Time to call Amnesty International? Pathological.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub llundrub@ wrote: You just seem angry to me. -Rather petulant and childish to me.,___ Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. The other remark I have about my challenges to you and Vaj yesterday was that here you sit day after day after day, challenging much of what TM is and who Maharishi is, and all who respond do so in the context of evaluating TM and Maharishi. So yesterday, understanding that I apply merciless rigor to TM and Maharishi and the TMO with regard to my acceptance or not of them, I decided why should Turq and Vaj be getting a free ride out of all of this? Why not apply the same rigor and scrutiny to their practices as I do to my own? And the results were very eye opening, you True Believers you!...Lol! :-) Please produce anything in either my posts of Vaj's that sounded True Believer like to you. My entire exchange with you yesterday was to help you realize how much of a solipsist you are -- you just make pronouncements, as if the fact that you have come to believe something makes it an actual fact. Each time I did that, you refused to respond. *Then* you started in with the stuff about Tibetan Buddhism, which I don't think *anyone* here believes was any- thing but anger on your part. I didn't deal with it per se -- it ain't my job to defend Tibetan Buddhism, especially because I'm technically not a Tibetan Buddhist :-) -- and concentrated on pointing out the utter stupidity of some of the things you were saying. And you see that as True Believerism. Ok. Whatever floats your boat. :-) In the light of the next day (and, as opposed to yesterday, sobriety), do you *really* stand behind your claim that TM eliminates suffering and creates world peace, the way you originally presented it, as an indisuputable fact? That was clearly one of the stupidest things I've ever heard *any* TMer say, and you still haven't addressed it. I'd love to hear you try.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 12, 2006, at 10:49 AM, llundrub wrote: It sounds as if these perticular people long for warm clothes and to be treated as if they were human beings, not imported slave labor. They have my best wishes, because it looks as if they're going to need them... -If your ultimate usefulness is your consciousness then it's as if you have your whole life ordered to that, just as the whole orange tree is squeezed into containers for your juicy pleasure. If some pundit grows a pair of balls they can escape. It would make a great movie. These persons in the US to bring enlightenment who don't know how to do anything. Great irony. I guess it already was made into movies before like the Garp flick and so onSeems to be a continuum that those who think they're smartest do the stupidest things. God is an irone. Isn't that what someone said recently? My biggest surprise was that no one seemed concerned that the TMer's cleaning their toilets could do so because they were viewed as untouchables. It also should give some insight into how M. views his western followers. Time to call Amnesty International? For the TM volunteers playing at being untouchables for a bunch of over-privleged brhamin pundits with personal chefs?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub llundrub@ wrote: You just seem angry to me. -Rather petulant and childish to me.,___ Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. The other remark I have about my challenges to you and Vaj yesterday was that here you sit day after day after day, challenging much of what TM is and who Maharishi is, and all who respond do so in the context of evaluating TM and Maharishi. So yesterday, understanding that I apply merciless rigor to TM and Maharishi and the TMO with regard to my acceptance or not of them, I decided why should Turq and Vaj be getting a free ride out of all of this? Why not apply the same rigor and scrutiny to their practices as I do to my own? And the results were very eye opening, you True Believers you!...Lol! :-) Please produce anything in either my posts of Vaj's that sounded True Believer like to you. My entire exchange with you yesterday was to help you realize how much of a solipsist you are -- you just make pronouncements, as if the fact that you have come to believe something makes it an actual fact. You have your opinions and I have mine. I thought we had cleared that up yesterday. I will continue to think of both you and Vaj as True Believers, which I define as those willing to be less critical of their own beliefs than they are those of others. Tibetan Buddhism ain't all its cracked up to be. *IMO*.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub llundrub@ wrote: You just seem angry to me. -Rather petulant and childish to me.,___ Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. The other remark I have about my challenges to you and Vaj yesterday was that here you sit day after day after day, challenging much of what TM is and who Maharishi is, and all who respond do so in the context of evaluating TM and Maharishi. So yesterday, understanding that I apply merciless rigor to TM and Maharishi and the TMO with regard to my acceptance or not of them, I decided why should Turq and Vaj be getting a free ride out of all of this? Why not apply the same rigor and scrutiny to their practices as I do to my own? And the results were very eye opening, you True Believers you!...Lol! :-) Please produce anything in either my posts of Vaj's that sounded True Believer like to you. The thing I find humorous about all of this is you first agreed with me yesterday that all was opinion; your stuff, my stuff, Vaj's stuff, traditions' stuff, Everyone's stuff, and then you keep asking me for evidence. Of what? My opinions? Lol!!! So what if I present them as facts? You've got an easy out- Don't Believe Me! Start learning to live with some of that ambiguity and paradox you talk about.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You have your opinions and I have mine. I thought we had cleared that up yesterday. I will continue to think of both you and Vaj as True Believers, which I define as those willing to be less critical of their own beliefs than they are those of others. Tibetan Buddhism ain't all its cracked up to be. *IMO*. Fair enough. Good to see you sober again.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub llundrub@ wrote: You just seem angry to me. -Rather petulant and childish to me.,___ Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. The other remark I have about my challenges to you and Vaj yesterday was that here you sit day after day after day, challenging much of what TM is and who Maharishi is, and all who respond do so in the context of evaluating TM and Maharishi. So yesterday, understanding that I apply merciless rigor to TM and Maharishi and the TMO with regard to my acceptance or not of them, I decided why should Turq and Vaj be getting a free ride out of all of this? Why not apply the same rigor and scrutiny to their practices as I do to my own? And the results were very eye opening, you True Believers you!...Lol! :-) Please produce anything in either my posts of Vaj's that sounded True Believer like to you. My entire exchange with you yesterday was to help you realize how much of a solipsist you are -- you just make pronouncements, as if the fact that you have come to believe something makes it an actual fact. You have your opinions and I have mine. I thought we had cleared that up yesterday. I will continue to think of both you and Vaj as True Believers, which I define as those willing to be less critical of their own beliefs than they are those of others. Tibetan Buddhism ain't all its cracked up to be. *IMO*. If you think Vaj is a TB, I guess you never really talked to him or heard his talk on Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic by nature...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you think Vaj is a TB, I guess you never really talked to him or heard his talk on Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic by nature... Kind of funny to say someone that calls himself Vajranatha is a spiritual anarchist, don't you think? That name sounds very much aligned with organized religion, probably Tibetan Buddhism. Oh well, one person's spiritual anarchist is another's religous shill, eh?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: snip Please produce anything in either my posts of Vaj's that sounded True Believer like to you. The thing I find humorous about all of this is you first agreed with me yesterday that all was opinion; your stuff, my stuff, Vaj's stuff, traditions' stuff, Everyone's stuff, and then you keep asking me for evidence. Of what? My opinions? Lol!!! So what if I present them as facts? You've got an easy out- Don't Believe Me! Start learning to live with some of that ambiguity and paradox you talk about. A little self-knowledge wouldn't hurt either. I think Barry's complaint about your purported solipsism is *the* funniest thing I've read from him both here and in over 10 years on alt.m.t, and that's saying something. It's just astonishing that those words could issue from his keyboard without burning his fingers.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 no_reply@ wrote: If you think Vaj is a TB, I guess you never really talked to him or heard his talk on Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic by nature... Kind of funny to say someone that calls himself Vajranatha is a spiritual anarchist, don't you think? That name sounds very much aligned with organized religion, probably Tibetan Buddhism. Oh well, one person's spiritual anarchist is another's religous shill, eh? Don't know much about the Naths do ya Jim?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 no_reply@ wrote: If you think Vaj is a TB, I guess you never really talked to him or heard his talk on Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic by nature... Kind of funny to say someone that calls himself Vajranatha is a spiritual anarchist, don't you think? That name sounds very much aligned with organized religion, probably Tibetan Buddhism. Oh well, one person's spiritual anarchist is another's religous shill, eh? It's official. Jim has become Judy. Must be the soybeans. :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
On Dec 12, 2006, at 2:00 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 no_reply@ wrote: If you think Vaj is a TB, I guess you never really talked to him or heard his talk on Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic by nature... Kind of funny to say someone that calls himself Vajranatha is a spiritual anarchist, don't you think? That name sounds very much aligned with organized religion, probably Tibetan Buddhism. Oh well, one person's spiritual anarchist is another's religous shill, eh? It's official. Jim has become Judy. Must be the soybeans. :-) I always just assumed he was holding his quartz crystal too tightly. They are very similar. He doesn't even realize that the basic precepts of spiritual anarchy are actually on the FFL front page: Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings -- that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide. ~ Dharma-pada, Buddha Shakyamuni I can recommend no less.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 no_reply@ wrote: If you think Vaj is a TB, I guess you never really talked to him or heard his talk on Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic by nature... Kind of funny to say someone that calls himself Vajranatha is a spiritual anarchist, don't you think? That name sounds very much aligned with organized religion, probably Tibetan Buddhism. Oh well, one person's spiritual anarchist is another's religous shill, eh? Don't know much about the Naths do ya Jim? Please explain.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 no_reply@ wrote: If you think Vaj is a TB, I guess you never really talked to him or heard his talk on Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic by nature... Kind of funny to say someone that calls himself Vajranatha is a spiritual anarchist, don't you think? That name sounds very much aligned with organized religion, probably Tibetan Buddhism. Oh well, one person's spiritual anarchist is another's religous shill, eh? It's official. Jim has become Judy. Must be the soybeans. :-) :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 12, 2006, at 2:00 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 no_reply@ wrote: If you think Vaj is a TB, I guess you never really talked to him or heard his talk on Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic by nature... Kind of funny to say someone that calls himself Vajranatha is a spiritual anarchist, don't you think? That name sounds very much aligned with organized religion, probably Tibetan Buddhism. Oh well, one person's spiritual anarchist is another's religous shill, eh? It's official. Jim has become Judy. Must be the soybeans. :-) I always just assumed he was holding his quartz crystal too tightly. They are very similar. He doesn't even realize that the basic precepts of spiritual anarchy are actually on the FFL front page: Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings -- that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide. ~ Dharma-pada, Buddha Shakyamuni I can recommend no less. Got it, Ken.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. The other remark I have about my challenges to you and Vaj yesterday was that here you sit day after day after day, challenging much of what TM is and who Maharishi is, and all who respond do so in the context of evaluating TM and Maharishi. So yesterday, understanding that I apply merciless rigor to TM and Maharishi and the TMO with regard to my acceptance or not of them, I decided why should Turq and Vaj be getting a free ride out of all of this? Why not apply the same rigor and scrutiny to their practices as I do to my own? And the results were very eye opening, you True Believers you!...Lol! :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. -Frankly, his lack of understanding, wish to trample my religion (whether he was right or not), and wish to beat Vaj at some game have lowered my estimation of him. I didn't know he was such a putz.This is why people that take pictures with gurus and post them on the internet as if they mean something are not to be trusted. I had thought Jim was a wiser, smarter person. I guess one expects more maturity from others as they all get older. This Vaj/llundrup team, what payroll are they on ?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
- Original Message - From: jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1:39 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info Surprisingly so. It's unlike Jim to be this angry. He must have had a twist in his panties yesterday. The other remark I have about my challenges to you and Vaj yesterday was that here you sit day after day after day, challenging much of what TM is and who Maharishi is, and all who respond do so in the context of evaluating TM and Maharishi. So yesterday, understanding that I apply merciless rigor to TM and Maharishi and the TMO with regard to my acceptance or not of them, I decided why should Turq and Vaj be getting a free ride out of all of this? Why not apply the same rigor and scrutiny to their practices as I do to my own? And the results were very eye opening, you True Believers you!...Lol! :-) Om mani peme hung
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
This Vaj/llundrup team, what payroll are they on ? We're not on a team, we're merely up your tight ass.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside Pundit Info
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 12, 2006, at 2:00 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 no_reply@ wrote: If you think Vaj is a TB, I guess you never really talked to him or heard his talk on Spiritual Anarchy and how genuine spirituality is anarchistic by nature... Kind of funny to say someone that calls himself Vajranatha is a spiritual anarchist, don't you think? That name sounds very much aligned with organized religion, probably Tibetan Buddhism. Oh well, one person's spiritual anarchist is another's religous shill, eh? It's official. Jim has become Judy. Must be the soybeans. :-) I always just assumed he was holding his quartz crystal too tightly. They are very similar. He doesn't even realize that the basic precepts of spiritual anarchy are actually on the FFL front page: Believe nothing merely because you have been told it. Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. But whatsoever, after due examination and analysis, you find to be kind, conducive to the good, the benefit, the welfare of all beings -- that doctrine believe and cling to, and take it as your guide. ~ Dharma-pada, Buddha Shakyamuni I can recommend no less. How about putting those nice words into practise Vaj ? Which is the problem with all organized religion, including Tibetan Buddism, they love words, prayers and cermonies, but is has little or no transformative power. Unlike TM I might add.