--- Dean M. Estabrook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good explanation Tyler ... now, how do you feel
about the GPO sounds?
Are they as good as the samples provided on the MM
site, or not? And
if not, what gives? Also, I've just received the
following message:
Dear Finale Macintosh
I finally saved one of my Finale files as a SmartMusicAccompaniment
file, since I had installed SmartMusic as part of the upgrade.
Then I ran SmartMusic to see how well my file worked within SmartMusic.
Imagine my shock when I was confronted with a message informing me that
I needed to
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 29 Jul 2005 at 15:46, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
This kind of comment confuses me enormously.
Isn't GPO being driven by MIDI data?
Don't you really mean that you can't drive but the one synthesizer at
a time if you're using GPO?
Its an Audio
Paul Witney wrote:
HI,
I know this topic has been around before, but I wanted to get opinions
as to what is the best printer to buy for Finale scores? I have Finale
2005, and am using windows XP.
Thank you in advance !
Do you want 11x17 printing capability?
Do you want to be able to
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Totally agree. I really think the GPO thing is fluff. I'd rather see
Finale get better at importing Midi files. I hate when a Midi that I've
done in Digital Performer does not come across correctly in Finale. It
happens all the time. It's frustrating, and wastes time.
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 29 Jul 2005, at 8:13 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
Since the Kontakt Player only shows eight instruments, I've been
having a hell of a time trying to load GPO patches for channels 9-16.
I suspect it's something easy, but I've just not found it.
Brad,
You can't.
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 29 Jul 2005, at 8:03 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
If HP works with any GM synthesizer, what's the advantage of GPO,
then?
1) Apparently opinions differ here, but I think GPO sounds are clearly
*far* superior to the Finale SoundFont, especially the wind, ensemble
David W. Fenton wrote:
[snip]
And does anyone fear that MakeMusic may have placed their bets on the
wrong horse in the sound samples race?
I'll raise my hand on this one.
I'll go further and say that I think MakeMusic has made a huge mistake
in including any such playback device.
I have
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 29 Jul 2005, at 9:06 PM, John Hughes wrote:
Mine sound just awful. I bought Fin2006 purely on the promise that I
could at last hear my work sound something like real. But I'm afraid I
was very disappointed. The same with Finale's HP. I could never use it.
You
Tyler Turner wrote:
Hi Craig,
Darcy mentioned it, but I just want to make sure you
caught it. For new compositions that you create with
the setup wizard, you don't have to do any GPO setup.
It's automatically done (and that's a major part of
the integration). For older files, yes, you will
ronan wrote:
I admit I was somewhat disappointed with the Finale/GPO instruments. To me
they didn't sound much better than the Softsynths. But I just got the patch
so I can use the full GPO and I've got all those wonderful sounds back.
There is a huge difference between the generic solo violin
Darcy James Argue wrote:
[snip]
Some people seem to have wildly unrealistic expectations of what GPO
is. It is *not* a massive, high-end sample library suitable for
professional film scoring. It will *not* fool anybody (or at least, not
anybody on this list) into thinking that they are
At 06:56 AM 7/30/05 -0400, dhbailey wrote:
I'll go further and say that I think MakeMusic has made a huge mistake
in including any such playback device.
I agree with you.
The production of 'human playback' Midi was worthwhile, because it pretty
much covers the ground of how effective production
At 06:35 AM 07/30/2005, dhbailey wrote:
Do you mean to tell us that we can only load 8 GPO instruments at a time?
No, you can load 8 instruments into each of 8 instances of the
player, for a total of 64. The (confusing) point was that it looks
like you *should* be able to load 16 instruments
At 06:56 AM 07/30/2005, dhbailey wrote:
we have to prepare THREE files -- one for printing, one for playback via
GPO and another playback file to share with others who don't have
machines powerful enough to use GPO.)
This does seem like sort of a problem.
For example, for my own use, I will
I have played around some more with the GPO and I will admit that its
sounds really are an improvement over the soundfont. A large
improvement? No. But an improvement nonetheless.
Worth the majority of the upgrade development effort? No.
Does anybody else notice that the green playback
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 06:35 AM 07/30/2005, dhbailey wrote:
Do you mean to tell us that we can only load 8 GPO instruments at a time?
No, you can load 8 instruments into each of 8 instances of the player,
for a total of 64. The (confusing) point was that it looks like you
*should* be able
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 06:56 AM 07/30/2005, dhbailey wrote:
we have to prepare THREE files -- one for printing, one for playback via
GPO and another playback file to share with others who don't have
machines powerful enough to use GPO.)
This does seem like sort of a problem.
For example,
At 08:25 AM 07/30/2005, dhbailey wrote:
powerful enough to load 8 instances of the player. I wonder why the
MakeMusic developers felt it incumbent on them to list those 8 instances
for the VST player as 1-16 instead of 1-8? Would different
NI-compatible soundsets actually allow use of all 16
I use the HP 5100 dtn (duplexing) on WinXP and there's no difference from
what Ken reports. It has a parallel port built in so you can use it with Mac
if you want (which I do, occasionally).
Cecil Rigby
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal)
www.harrockhall.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ken Durling [EMAIL
On Jul 29, 2005, at 7:29 PM, Paul Witney wrote:
x-tad-biggerHI,/x-tad-bigger
x-tad-bigger /x-tad-bigger
x-tad-biggerI know this topic has been around before, but I wanted to get opinions as to what is the best printer to buy for Finale scores? I have Finale 2005, and am using windows
Tyler Turner wrote:
Hi Craig,
Darcy mentioned it, but I just want to make sure you
caught it. For new compositions that you create with
the setup wizard, you don't have to do any GPO setup.
It's automatically done (and that's a major part of
the integration). For older files, yes, you will
I know this topic has been around before, but I wanted to get
opinions as to what is the best printer to buy for Finale scores? I
have Finale 2005, and am using windows XP.
I've been using an HP LaserJet 5100 for a few years now, and I simply
can't imagine anything better.
I have an HP
On 30/07/05, dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still waiting to be shown why GPO/Kontakt playback is superior. A
kind member of this list has offered to work on a file of mine to show
me how to get improved playback via GPO. I am eager to see what the
result is.
Jari has just put up
Indeed. They should have included a couple of demos. Everyone who uses
GPO says it takes some learning to get the best out of it. And,
MakeMusic of course documented how to do itnot!
I'd rather have had more improvements than GPO included. I seriously
think this update sucks. It seems
Which is totally an oversight by MakeMusic. I don't know about VST
(don't really use it), but I use GPO (full version) with Digital
Performer, and I can easily have my cake (Audio Units) and eat it too
(and Midi).
It doesn't make sense that you can't mix it. You can get a max of 8
Ha! Welcome to Smartmusic. Please leave your credit card with MakeMusic.
I think you can get around actually buying a subscription. Or you used
to. You just won't be able to access the library of smart music.
Perhaps they changed this
dhbailey wrote:
I finally saved one of my Finale
After talking about the features and drawbacks I have straightforward
workflow questions. Reading all that's be written to date, I have
some basic questions about how to use the program that I haven't
heard addressed yet.
What is the best way to start a new project in Finale? I can imagine
Despite my lack of enthusiasm for the wisdom of
doing so, I frequently need to prepare demosin CD format of new
compositions or arrangements for a few of the younger members of my
orchestra. Can anyone tell me if saving as an audio file (in '06)
offers the choice ofsoftsynth HP OR GPO
Thank you ... I found this most helpful.
Dean
On Jul 30, 2005, at 8:40 AM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On 30/07/05, dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still waiting to be shown why GPO/Kontakt playback is superior.
A
kind member of this list has offered to work on a file of mine to show
me
- Original Message -
From: Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale2006 and GPO
On 29 Jul 2005, at 9:06 PM, John Hughes wrote:
Mine sound just awful. I bought Fin2006 purely on the promise that I
could
You can get a max of 8 instruments with the GPO version that comes
with Finale 2006? So, if you happen to do an arrangement that has
more than 8 instruments, you are out of luck in using GPO. You'd have
to use the soundfonts or Midi.
I seem to be able to address 8 banks or 8 instruments (64
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Which is totally an oversight by MakeMusic. I don't know about VST
(don't really use it), but I use GPO (full version) with Digital
Performer, and I can easily have my cake (Audio Units) and eat it
too (and Midi).
It doesn't make sense that you can't mix it. You can
Thanks.
Dean
On Jul 30, 2005, at 12:29 AM, Tyler Turner wrote:
--- Dean M. Estabrook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good explanation Tyler ... now, how do you feel
about the GPO sounds?
Are they as good as the samples provided on the MM
site, or not? And
if not, what gives? Also, I've just
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Totally agree. I really think the GPO thing is fluff. I'd rather see
Finale get better at importing Midi files. I hate when a Midi that
I've
done in Digital Performer does not come across correctly in Finale. It
happens all the time. It's frustrating, and wastes time.
DAVID, YOU'RE A PRINCE.
Your suggestion worked. I can't tell you how much I appreciate your
willingness to help fellow Finale strugglers. It must happen so often to
members on the list who sometimes reach the point of desperation, when a
shining light reaches out to them from another member
The sound of full GPO compared to Finale/GPO is 100% better. Finale used
generic sounding instruments, while in Garritan's GPO you get instruments
with character. Frankly, I can't tell the difference between Softsynths and
the Finale/GPO instruments, but I don't have the best of hearing.
Ron
No, you can load up to 64 instruments at a time. There are 8 instances of
the Kontakt player that can be loaded under Midi set up.
Ron
Ronald J Brown
PO Box 138
Newboro ON K0G 1P0
(613) 272-3181
http://www.RonaldJBrown.com
-Original Message-
From: dhbailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 05:56 PM 7/29/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
Well, you won't encounter the problems unless you persist in using
your optical drives like removable disks, i.e., the way you could in
all previous versions of Windows.
Here's the scenario that reveals the problems:
Use commandline XCOPY to
In the Kontakt player, in the box underneath the CPO Usage box is a happy
face? cat? (it's so small I can't make out what it's suppose to be.) Click
that and you can assign an input channel to the instrument you have
selected. So, yes, you can have Finale write to Channels 9-16, the have your
I read in another site that Save as
Audio will be in a maintenance release.
Ron
Ronald J Brown
PO Box
138
Newboro ON K0G 1P0
(613) 272-3181
http://www.RonaldJBrown.com
From: Mariposa
Symphony Orchestra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 30, 2005 12:12 PM
To:
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:27 PM, John Hughes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Darcy James Argue
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mine sound just awful. I bought Fin2006 purely on the promise that I
could at last hear my work sound something like real. But I'm afraid
I was very disappointed. The same
On 30 Jul 2005, at 7:06 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Tyler Turner wrote:
Hi Craig,
Darcy mentioned it, but I just want to make sure you
caught it. For new compositions that you create with
the setup wizard, you don't have to do any GPO setup.
It's automatically done (and that's a major part of
the
Stephen Peters / 2005/07/29 / 01:38 PM wrote:
But this is a matter of testing *other* applications to make
sure that they still worked after the procedure, which I strongly
doubt is part of their test suite.
Address Book is a part of OSX, which is not other application in this
context. Look,
On 30 Jul 2005, at 6:56 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I have an enormous problem with the fact that the majority of my
upgrade dollars have gone to something which is problematic to use at
best (now we have to prepare THREE files -- one for printing, one for
playback via GPO and another playback file
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:02 PM, Andrew Levin wrote:
What is the best way to start a new project in Finale?
Setup Wizard.
*There are times when I know I'll need GPO, so I'll start up with the
GPO wizard
There is no GPO Wizard. There is an option in the Setup Wizard to
use GPO Finale Edition
On 30 Jul 2005, at 11:46 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
You can get a max of 8 instruments with the GPO version that comes
with Finale 2006?
No. Max 64 channels (and many are keyswitching, so no need to use up
separate channels for arco violins and pizz violins.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 30 Jul 2005, at 11:40 AM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On 30/07/05, dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still waiting to be shown why GPO/Kontakt playback is superior.
A
kind member of this list has offered to work on a file of mine to show
me how to get improved playback via GPO. I am eager
On 30 Jul 2005, at 1:26 PM, ronan wrote:
In the Kontakt player, in the box underneath the CPO Usage box is a
happy
face? cat? (it's so small I can't make out what it's suppose to be.)
Click
that and you can assign an input channel to the instrument you have
selected. So, yes, you can have
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:11 PM, Mariposa Symphony Orchestra wrote:
Can anyone tell me if saving as an audio file (in '06) offers the
choice of softsynth HP OR GPO playback - MY choice? Or is it a
default over which I'd have no control?
Save as Audio for GPO is not hooked up yet. Yes,
Details here:
http://tinyurl.com/d4wrm
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Disappointing: yes. Surprising:
no.
But thanks very much
for the info, Darcy --
Best,
Les
Les MarsdenFounding Music Director and Conductor, The Mariposa
Symphony OrchestraMusic and Mariposa? Ah, Paradise!!!
Ok ... just installed 2006 w/out any problems I can detect. Messed
around with a couple of instruments in GPO (Eng. Hrn. and Cl.) in a
little duet I wrote. I think the quality of the sounds and human
playback are excellent, as promised. However, when I added a couple of
more instruments, as
At 11:46 AM 07/30/2005, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
You can get a max of 8
instruments with the GPO version that comes with Finale 2006?
This has been said elsewhere, but just to be clear: You can get 64
instruments. You can instantiate 8 Kontakt players, and each player
can have 8 instruments.
At 12:34 PM 07/30/2005, Simon Troup wrote:
It looks like I should be able to address 8 banks of 16 instruments,
but I can't figure out how to access, for example, the second tier of
the the first bank (9 to 16).
You can't. For whatever reason, and whatever limitation, you can only
access the
At 02:11 PM 07/30/2005, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Save as Audio for GPO is not hooked up yet.
Well, that's really stupid. I would assume that most people who are
using GPO want it to produce demo CDs for others, not just for their
own in-house enjoyment.
I know there are workarounds and ways
- Original Message -
From: Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale2006 and GPO
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:27 PM, John Hughes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 30 Jul 2005, at 3:02 PM, John Hughes wrote:
The trumpet, for a start, sounds absolutely nothing like a trumpet. I
am a trumpet player and the sound I hear really offends me.
Everyone's always biased towards their own instrument. Johannes has
said that the solo violins sound nothing like
Of course you'd like it to work with MusicXML. Isn't that YOUR company?
Where is the guess work in MIDI files? Example, I can do something in
Digital Performer, load it into Logic, and it looks the same. Triplets
come out as triplets. Etc. But I load the same file into Finale, and the
triplet
My Dear Listfriends,
As one who (wisely?) sprang for GPO prior to MakeMusic's (MM) 2006
announcement, I would like to add my two cents to what I've read so far.
1. GPO is a lovely set of sounds with really terrible documentation. I
know how the percussion works now, I simply cannot imagine how
Where is the guess work in MIDI files? Example, I can do something in
Digital Performer, load it into Logic, and it looks the same.
Triplets come out as triplets. Etc. But I load the same file into
Finale, and the triplet comes out wrong.
Hi eric
I'm intrigued, if you have a moment send me a
Where is the setting for Ambiance Reverb? I've missed it somehow.
MIDI Native Instruments AU SetUp Ambience Reverb Edit
It's at the bottom of the dialog box.
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
dennis c. wrote:
dhbailey wrote:
In any event, the plug-ins for mid-measure repeats work fine, the
automatic adjustment of measure numbers when deleting a measure is
very nice, but hardly worth the $100 upgrade fee.
One wonders why you were in such a hurry to spend these 100 bucks. After
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Ha! Welcome to Smartmusic. Please leave your credit card with MakeMusic.
I think you can get around actually buying a subscription. Or you used
to. You just won't be able to access the library of smart music.
Perhaps they changed this
They've apparently
On 30 Jul 2005 at 7:37, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 06:56 AM 7/30/05 -0400, dhbailey wrote:
I'll go further and say that I think MakeMusic has made a huge
mistake in including any such playback device.
I agree with you.
The production of 'human playback' Midi was worthwhile, because
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 30 Jul 2005, at 6:56 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I have an enormous problem with the fact that the majority of my
upgrade dollars have gone to something which is problematic to use at
best (now we have to prepare THREE files -- one for printing, one for
playback via GPO
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Ok ... just installed 2006 w/out any problems I can detect. Messed
around with a couple of instruments in GPO (Eng. Hrn. and Cl.) in a
little duet I wrote. I think the quality of the sounds and human
playback are excellent, as promised. However, when I added a
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 02:11 PM 07/30/2005, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Save as Audio for GPO is not hooked up yet.
Well, that's really stupid. I would assume that most people who are
using GPO want it to produce demo CDs for others, not just for their own
in-house enjoyment.
I know there
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 11:46 AM 07/30/2005, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
You can get a max of 8
instruments with the GPO version that comes with Finale 2006?
This has been said elsewhere, but just to be clear: You can get 64
instruments. You can instantiate 8 Kontakt players, and each player can
On 30 Jul 2005 at 8:40, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On 30/07/05, dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still waiting to be shown why GPO/Kontakt playback is superior.
A kind member of this list has offered to work on a file of mine to
show me how to get improved playback via GPO. I am eager
- Original Message -
From: Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Finale2006 and GPO
On 30 Jul 2005, at 3:02 PM, John Hughes wrote:
The trumpet, for a start, sounds absolutely nothing like a trumpet. I am
On 30 Jul 2005 at 13:10, Phil Daley wrote:
At 05:56 PM 7/29/2005, David W. Fenton wrote:
Well, you won't encounter the problems unless you persist in using
your optical drives like removable disks, i.e., the way you could in
all previous versions of Windows.
Here's the scenario that
I thought so myself, and it is on channel 10, but still the piano
sounds. Now, interestingly enough, when I tried Hyperscrive in GPO,
the countoff and click sound was automatically a percussion sound (kind
of like a triangle, I think).
H ..
Dean
On Jul 30, 2005, at 3:08 PM, dhbailey
On 30 Jul 2005 at 13:56, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 30 Jul 2005, at 12:02 PM, Andrew Levin wrote:
[]
One other marginally related question: I read here (or Jari's
review, or the Finale web site -- sorry that I can't remember) that
GPO output is only for the sound that comes out of your
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Of course you'd like it to work with MusicXML. Isn't that YOUR company?
Where is the guess work in MIDI files? Example, I can do something in
Digital Performer, load it into Logic, and it looks the same. Triplets
come out as triplets. Etc. But I load the same file into
Has anyone noticed that Finale 2006 seems slower on a lot of things than
2005 was. For example, if I highlight a bar, then hold shift, then go to
another bar, there is a lag. I didn't have that with Finale 2005.
I see the lag big time on my 933 G4, and a little on my Mini Mac. I have
yet to
On 30 Jul 2005 at 15:27, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
I thought so myself, and it is on channel 10, but still the piano
sounds. Now, interestingly enough, when I tried Hyperscrive in GPO,
the countoff and click sound was automatically a percussion sound
(kind of like a triangle, I think). H
Indeed. I seriously think this update blows. I don't see any speed
improvements, in fact, I see a lot of things that seem slower, like
highlighting stuff using Mass Mover.
dhbailey wrote:
Timetables, Aaron, timetables. Deadlines doth make compromisers of us
all.
Better a product which
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Darcy:
Where is the setting for Ambiance Reverb? I've missed it somehow.
Under Midi, click on Native Instruments VST Setup. There is a checkbox
at the bottom called Ambiance Reverb. There is an edit button next to
it. Click the EDIT button and you can then
That really sucks. I have an active subscription to SmartMusic (as the
schools around here use it in their music program).
Too bad they don't have a standalone player.
dhbailey wrote:
They've apparently changed this because when I try to play my own
music, entered into Finale and saved
Just to have a break from GPO issues, here's something a little odd I just
noticed.
I have a passage with 16th-note 6-tuples in some parts, 8th-note triplets in
others, and various mixed duple and other rhythms in others. In the tuple
rhythms, the tuple number is on the beam side, with no
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Has anyone noticed that Finale 2006 seems slower on a lot of things than
2005 was. For example, if I highlight a bar, then hold shift, then go to
another bar, there is a lag. I didn't have that with Finale 2005.
I see the lag big time on my 933 G4, and a little on my
On Jul 30, 2005, at 2:44 PM, dhbailey wrote:n the past, even when there hasn't been much of great import touted in the upgrades, I have found each one I have purchased (every one since I started using version 3.5) to have had significant numbers of small improvements all through the program. I
Yes, I could ... not a problem. It's just that when inputting in
soundfont, via Hyperscribe, it's easier to deal with a percussive
sound, which I haven't been able to get yet. If I understand your
question correctly.
Thanks,
Dean
On Jul 30, 2005, at 3:46 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On
Yes, I have noticed. Please make sure you send your complaints to
Macsupport immediately.
Johannes
Eric Dannewitz schrieb:
Has anyone noticed that Finale 2006 seems slower on a lot of things than
2005 was. For example, if I highlight a bar, then hold shift, then go to
another bar, there is a
I stand corrected.
Ron
Ronald J Brown
PO Box 138
Newboro ON K0G 1P0
(613) 272-3181
http://www.RonaldJBrown.com
-Original Message-
From: Darcy James Argue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 30, 2005 2:09 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] GPO instrument loading
On 30 Jul
Got it,
Thanks,
Dean
On Jul 30, 2005, at 3:46 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Darcy:
Where is the setting for Ambiance Reverb? I've missed it somehow.
Under Midi, click on Native Instruments VST Setup. There is a
checkbox at the bottom called Ambiance Reverb. There is an
At 06:11 PM 07/30/2005, dhbailey wrote:
Better a product which doesn't work as it should but is shipped when
promised than a product which excels but may be late.
Hogwash.
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
On Jul 30, 2005, at 2:44 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:If you're going to use a different file for playback, why not just save your printable score as MIDI then use a sequencer to tweak playback? Why use Finale at all for creating a playback file if you're going to fork your playback from the
At 06:40 PM 07/30/2005, dhbailey wrote:
Which brings up the question as to why the Ambience Reverb doesn't give
us Room Sizes to choose from, at least on the Windows side of things?
Is that something to be expected in the maintenance release as well?
Yes, according to Winsupport.
Aaron.
David,
HALLELUJAH! At least someone understands what I am getting at.
Many thanks for the kind suggestions you put forth in your previous email.
Constructive help is so much nicer than sniping. I shall now go forth and
put them into practice.
In my own defence, I would like to explain
I just finished setting up a symphonic score with 40 instruments, using
Finale with the full version of GPO. I have each percussion instrument set
to a different channel. Eg, Snare: 67; tamtam = 68, etc. They play back
beautifully.
BTW, I didn't bother with midi assignments. I left all of them
Hi Eric,
Where is the guess work in MIDI files?
If MIDI was good enough for music notation, there would have been no
need to invent MusicXML. We invented MusicXML because there was no
adequate way to transfer music notation between applications.
MIDI's inadequacy for music notation is hardly
On 30 Jul 2005 at 16:44, Michael Good wrote:
Hi Eric,
Where is the guess work in MIDI files?
If MIDI was good enough for music notation, there would have been no
need to invent MusicXML. We invented MusicXML because there was no
adequate way to transfer music notation between
Sent! I am amazed at the low quality of this release. Seriously.
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Yes, I have noticed. Please make sure you send your complaints to
Macsupport immediately.
Johannes
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Thank you!
David W. Fenton wrote:
I think you're missing the point.
The problems Eric was having with MIDI import have *nothing* to do
with notational elements that cannot be included in MIDI files. They
have everything to do with Finale's obtuse transcription of MIDI data
into notation.
This has been said elsewhere, but just to be clear: You can get 64
instruments. You can instantiate 8 Kontakt players, and each player
can have 8 instruments. That makes 64.
If your computer can handle all 8 instances of the Kontakt player.
True, but you're going to run into this with
No to be rude, but I really don't care about MusicXML. I'm dealing with
MIDI files. The way most professional sequencers (Digital
Performer/Protools/Logic) can shuttle things back and forth. I don't see
studio's MusicXML to get stuff out of Digital Performer into Sibelius or
Finale.
All
I see the lag big time on my 933 G4, and a little on my Mini Mac. I
have yet to try the PC version. Both Macs are maxed out with ram, and
running 10.4.2
Maybe you're not getting the benefit from CoreGraphics? What graphics card do
you have?
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
Indeed. I seriously think this update blows. I don't see any speed
improvements, in fact, I see a lot of things that seem slower, like
highlighting stuff using Mass Mover.
I've got speed parity or improvement.
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
___
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
