Owain Sutton wrote:
Ken Moore wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] David W.
Fenton writes:
On the other hand, notating it as a full measure with a rest would
tend to obscure the upbeatness of the entire measure.
Do you have a view on Elgar's Cockaigne overture, the first bar of
which starts
Owain Sutton wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
Or they aren't even trying.
I think Finale, with its unlinked templates and unlinked libaries, is
terribly flawed at a basic conceptual level
My bet is the first notation software which does that (Sibelius,
Finale or the newly developping Notion
Owain Sutton wrote:
Harold Owen wrote:
On Mar 19, 2005, at 6:31 AM, dhbailey wrote:
I've also played from published music where only half of the parts
had measure numbers (actual counting numbers) and the other half
didn't have anything.
I am currently rehearsing for a performance of the
Load slot 1 with player one -- then hold shift and load player 2 into
same slot.
Jerry
On 19-Mar-05, at 11:13 PM, John Bell wrote:
On 15 Mar 2005, at 14:23, Gerald Berg wrote:
John
You're in the game now -- the hunt begins in earnest. At this point
you have your strings on channels 33-36
Midi
Hi David,
You do have to run the plug-in following part extraction, but it's
still much more automated than editing all the staff name headers by
hand. You need only run it once, and it will fill in the staff name
headers for all open documents.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On
Don,
Put the playback notes in a layer with Affects Music Spacing turned
off.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 20 Mar 2005, at 1:15 PM, Don Hart wrote:
Hi folks,
I would love to hide the notes of a harp gliss written out for playback
purposes (smart shape gliss and chord symbol to
Thanks, Darcy.
Silly me, I was looking in Music Spacing Options. ;-)
Don
on 3/20/05 12:18 PM, Darcy James Argue at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don,
Put the playback notes in a layer with Affects Music Spacing turned
off.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 20 Mar
In any case, where's the first downbeat of Beethoven 5? If it's
impossible to determine, then what should be notated?
___
This reminds me of a point RE that symphony: it's earliest listeners
would have had no idea, upon hearing the opening notes,
On Mar 19, 2005, at 7:24 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
There's a break in the third bar of A. I
That brings up another source of confusion: is 3 after A the same
measure as the third bar of A, or is it a bar later?
It's a rhetorical question, so for heaven's sake, don't answer! I'm
just
I currently own:
Power Mac G4 (500 MHz)
OS X 10.3.5
Finale 2004c
EPS export on this system takes forever, which is one of the reasons
I'm going to get a new Power Mac G5 soon. I have an orchestral score
and parts due September 1, 2005, for which I'd like to use the new
Power Mac G5.
If anyone
on 3/20/05 2:34 PM, Paul Hayden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I currently own:
Power Mac G4 (500 MHz)
OS X 10.3.5
Finale 2004c
EPS export on this system takes forever, which is one of the reasons
I'm going to get a new Power Mac G5 soon. I have an orchestral score
and parts due September
Is it possible, in Win Fin 2001 to put a Small note
cue melody line above a drum part which is largely staff style measure or
double measure repeats.
I have no prob putting a cue line over a drum part, but how do
I do it over staff style measure repeats.
Cheers, Keith in OZ
On 20 Mar 2005, at 3:34 PM, Paul Hayden wrote:
1. Finale 2005 will probably not work with Tiger, correct?
I would be very surprised if it did not. Finale 2004 and 2005 both
work on Mac OS X 10.2.x and newer -- there's no reason why anyone
should expect that 10.4 will break compatibility with
On 20 Mar 2005, at 6:06 PM, Eric Dussault wrote:
EPS export takes forever on ANY system. I have a PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8
GHz with 1 GB of Ram, and it doesn't make any difference.
I think you'd find otherwise if you actually did timed benchmarks of
your system versus Paul's system (500 MHz G4).
EPS export takes forever on ANY system. I have a PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8
GHz with 1 GB of Ram, and it doesn't make any difference. If you have a
big score with all the parts to link with eps, prepare yourself for the
worst, it will take a huge amount of your precious time, not even
considering
On Mar 20, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Keith Helgesen wrote:
x-tad-bigger/x-tad-bigger
x-tad-biggerIs it possible, in Win Fin 2001 to put a Small note cue melody line above a drum part which is largely staff style measure or double measure repeats./x-tad-bigger
x-tad-bigger/x-tad-bigger
x-tad-biggerI
Le 05-03-20, à 18:18, Darcy James Argue a écrit :
On 20 Mar 2005, at 6:06 PM, Eric Dussault wrote:
EPS export takes forever on ANY system. I have a PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8
GHz with 1 GB of Ram, and it doesn't make any difference.
I think you'd find otherwise if you actually did timed benchmarks of
on 3/20/05 2:34 PM, Paul Hayden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I currently own:
Power Mac G4 (500 MHz)
OS X 10.3.5
Finale 2004c
EPS export on this system takes forever, which is one of the reasons
I'm going to get a new Power Mac G5 soon. I have an orchestral score
and parts due September 1, 2005,
Thanks you Christopher. My rationale is I
have a two bar bolero rhythm going on and the melodic cue is merely to advise
the drummer as to where he is up to- not for him to ever play the cue.
Thanks for info!
Cheers K in OZ
Keith Helgesen.
Director of Music, Canberra City Band.
Hey Keith,
One thing I forgot to mention -- no matter if you use slashes or
two-bar repeats, you should label the ensemble cues with CUE ONLY -
DON'T PLAY.
The first time through, the drummer will still try to play them, but at
least you will have something to point to on his part when you
Keith,
The standard solution in this case -- which I would really recommend
you adopt instead of two-bar repeats -- is to write out two bars of the
bolero rhythm, then use slash notation after that, with a cont. sim.
indication, and ensemble cues above the staff.
There are all kinds of
Darcy James Argue / 05.3.20 / 05:37 PM wrote:
No, that's actually a very bad idea, because then you will have to pay
an extra $129 for Tiger when it is released. If you hold off buying
your new Mac until 10.4 is released, you will get 10.4 for free -- it
will be preinstalled on your computer.
Hi Hiro,
Paul said he wanted Tiger (OS X 10.4). I understand your reasons for
*not* wanting to install Tiger right away, but Paul said he wants it.
And if you did want Tiger, it would be a bad idea to buy a new computer
now instead of after Tiger is released, because you'll end up having to
23 matches
Mail list logo
