[Fink-devel] 10.2 Testing/Bindist/Etc?

2002-09-22 Thread Kyle Moffett
I now have a fresh 10.2 Fink install on a brand new Dual Ghz machine. What can I do to help? Kyle Moffett --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [Fink-devel] cleaner Fink environment?

2002-06-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
dded to the InstallScript by Fink to modify the .sh file, then go on to recreate the .csh file from it. Then, right before a compile, in the same shell that the compile will take place in, run 'env -i' and 'source /se/fink/cleanenv.cs

[Fink-devel] Bug in System Preferences is not a bug!!!

2002-06-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
m System Preferences, otherwise they couldn't be changed from there after being created in Server Admin. So the bug in System Preferences, that it sees UIDs below 500 is not really a bug at all!!! Sorry for being OT, Kyle Moffett ___ D

Re: [Fink-devel] Badly behaved packages

2002-06-05 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 04:49 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: > These need to be fixed: > pil > windowmaker-shlibs > > Both depend on libpng instead of libpng-shlibs or libpng3-shlibs > > Thanks, >

[Fink-devel] Badly behaved packages

2002-06-05 Thread Kyle Moffett
These need to be fixed: pil windowmaker-shlibs Both depend on libpng instead of libpng-shlibs or libpng3-shlibs Thanks, Kyle Moffett ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference Au

Re: [Fink-devel] KDE-Base-SSL Compile Error

2002-06-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
I do have links equivalent to X11->/usr/X11R6/lib/X11 and > X11->/usr/X11R6/include/X11 > in /usr/local/{lib,include}/ . > Do you have equivalent links ? No I don't, what version/revision of xfree86-base and xfree86-rootless are you using? > JF Mertens Thanks for the hel

Re: [Fink-devel] KDE-Base-SSL Compile Error

2002-06-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
I think that it is the presence of gcc as well as cc that is causing the problem. Perhaps the cc portions were patched, but for gcc some additional flag gets passed, etc. Thanks, Kyle Moffett On Sunday, June 2, 2002, at 07:42 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > On Sunday, June 2, 2002, at

[Fink-devel] /sw/include/apt-pkg docs?

2002-06-01 Thread Kyle Moffett
Does anybody know where I can find docs or reference stuff or file descriptions of the apt headers in /sw/include/apt-pkg? Thanks, Kyle Moffett ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference Augus

Re: [Fink-devel] KDE-Base-SSL Compile Error

2002-06-01 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Saturday, June 1, 2002, at 09:59 PM, Ben Hines wrote: > At 6:20 PM -0700 6/1/02, Torrey T. Lyons wrote: >> At 7:35 PM -0400 6/1/02, Kyle Moffett wrote: >>> >>> /usr/bin/ld: .libs/XftConfig.o illegal reference to symbol: >>> _XftConfigLexFile defined in i

[Fink-devel] KDE-Base-SSL Compile Error

2002-06-01 Thread Kyle Moffett
Does anybody know how to fix this? April 2002 Dev Tools Mac OS X 10.1.4 Thanks In Advance, Kyle Moffett ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintp

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiled libraries for fink

2002-05-29 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Wednesday, May 29, 2002, at 05:42 PM, Max Horn wrote: > At 16:47 Uhr -0400 29.05.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> The most frequently occurring problem is the lack of Fink >> implementation of the Conflicts field. It is currently only >> implemented by dpkg. Here is an

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiled libraries for fink

2002-05-29 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, May 28, 2002, at 08:14 PM, Max Horn wrote: At 18:26 Uhr -0400 28.05.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: I have been extensively looking at the Fink coding and Perl scripts/libraries, and I think I have an idea. I believe that much of the Fink code needs an overhaul. The whole dependancy

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiled libraries for fink

2002-05-28 Thread Kyle Moffett
to bed sometime before school starts) Sorry for the confusion, Kyle Moffett

[Fink-devel] Compiled libraries for fink

2002-05-28 Thread Kyle Moffett
I have been extensively looking at the Fink coding and Perl scripts/libraries, and I think I have an idea. I believe that much of the Fink code needs an overhaul. The whole dependancy system is starting to break down. (See recent threads involving splitoff/shared libs problems) Also, a prop

Re: [Fink-devel] XFree86-Rootless is borked

2002-05-23 Thread Kyle Moffett
Darn, that should be fixed. Does anybody know exactly what fails? I'm gonna use the binary, but I'd like to fix the source too (For Jaguar, since it uses an updated version of the April dev tools). Thanks anyway, Kyle Moffett On Thursday, May 23, 2002, at 07:38 AM, Jeff Whit

[Fink-devel] XFree86-Rootless is borked

2002-05-23 Thread Kyle Moffett
at is created is the binary. Has anyone else had this problem? Thanks in advance, Kyle Moffett ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.co

Re: [Fink-devel] http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/x11/index.php update?

2002-05-20 Thread Kyle Moffett
problem (It adds extra type & creator codes to many files) I recommend using OmniWeb (Free: www.omnigroup.com) Here is the solution: Force format fix by pressing Cmd-Shift-T until it changes to a blocky monospaced type Run "File->Save As..." and replace the older file.

Re: [Fink-devel] Hmm. I wonder what this means?

2002-04-25 Thread Kyle Moffett
gt; /Volumes/Software/Darwin/usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps > /Volumes/Software/Darwin/usr/bin/dpkg-source > /Volumes/Software/Darwin/usr/bin/dpkg-split > > -- > Martin Thanks, I just wasn't sure what that was. Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Hmm. I wonder what this means?

2002-04-24 Thread Kyle Moffett
, text-cmds I wonder if Apple is using/planning to use dpkg? Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Problems with templates in C++

2002-04-19 Thread Kyle Moffett
ance, Kyle Moffett

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiling Apache 2.0

2002-04-17 Thread Kyle Moffett
only be the case for modules built at the same time as the server. (AKA the server's build process is slightly messed up) I'm gonna get that worked out, then work on fixing it for Fink, if I get the time, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel ma

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink 0.4.0 released

2002-04-17 Thread Kyle Moffett
it, installing the (free) upgrade to 10.1 is strongly recommeded. Free? I had to pay 29.99 USD to replace my scratched 10.1 update CD. Hope you didn't send this to fink-users too! Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https:

[Fink-devel] Compiling Apache 2.0

2002-04-17 Thread Kyle Moffett
f the compile, 'touch mod_echo.slo' should be 'touch mod_echo.so' Can somebody please help! If this is a bug in the build process, I can send it to the Apache group. Thanks in advance, Kyle Moffett

[Fink-devel] Problems with the Fink expat package

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
building expat, and that directory (root-expat-1.95.1-1) does not exist, I can only assume that something still points to it somewhere, and that is a problem with the expat package. Thanks in advance, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Max Horn wrote: > At 17:54 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Max Horn wrote: >>> At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: >>>> I feel kind of stupid now, but ma

[Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
hine, overwriting Apple's version 1.3. Thanks in advance, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Max Horn wrote: > At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> I feel kind of stupid now, but maybe something where Fink could update >> itself to the latest cvs would be helpful > > "fink selfupdate-cvs" > &

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 10:44 PM, Ben Hines wrote: > At 10:32 PM -0400 4/15/02, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> I have a proposal to make: >> >> Fink packages in unstable-cvs and stable-cvs requiring a package >> manager newer than the latest bindist should include a Fin

[Fink-devel] Fink Package Version Checking

2002-04-15 Thread Kyle Moffett
and (Optionally) install the latest package manager from cvs. Thoughts? Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Ideas for stuff outside the Fink tree (Was: Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [ fink-Package Submissions-543612 ] FinkCommander package)

2002-04-14 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Sunday, April 14, 2002, at 07:17 PM, Max Horn wrote: > Not really. I understand what you explain above. But it doesn't justify > packaging the .app in the first place, it only describes an ugly (no > offense meant) way to hack around a problem that stems from the fact > that we abuse Fink/

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
ut references to us in their CDs We all turn out happy, however, we would need to communicate with them first, but before that we need to decide a plan of action among ourselves. Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 09:40 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: > All we have to do is make it better than OpenOSX's CD and give a free > copy to MacWorld :) That I like! Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
like you. > Maybe we should tell those projects that OpenOSX is screwing them? I like that idea, I like it alot Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
n a single CD!) Creating the > content for such a CD is easy, maybe we could do it after the 0.4.0 > release. Producing and marketing the CD, though, is something which I > don't think any of the fink developers have time for. Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 07:56 PM, Chris Devers wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: > >> Additionally, they fail to provide the source code for any of the >> packages they distribute, and some, including the ones listed above, >> they fail to pr

[Fink-devel] What is the current state of the OpenOSX Installer SW?

2002-04-09 Thread Kyle Moffett
I have been seeing some disturbing articles lately, and based on previous relations with OpenOSX.com, they may be getting publicity that's rightfully ours. Today I recieved a MacWorld magazine. The macbeat article talked about OpenOSX Office, a CD from OpenOSX with Abiword, gnumeric, The Gim

Re: [Fink-devel] foo-bin (con.)

2002-02-26 Thread Kyle Moffett
n be revised to say "Depends: foo-shlibs". I agree with this, that for the interim period, that should happen, but I think that BuildDepends would be better for foo-bin, because that way, foo-shlibs gets built and installed, then foo-bin, then foo. After all are built, the user co

Re: [Fink-devel] foo-bin (con.)

2002-02-25 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 07:58 , David R. Morrison wrote: > Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 11:20 , David R. Morrison wrote: >>> Packages containing both binary files and libraries >>> > [snip] >&

Re: [Fink-devel] foo-bin (con.)

2002-02-25 Thread Kyle Moffett
BuildDepends, that way the binaries get built with the header files, but they are removable afterwards. > ___ > Fink-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel JMHO, Kyle Moffett

Re: [Fink-devel] control-center problem solved

2002-02-25 Thread Kyle Moffett
Version: 4.2.1 Depends: (anything it needs to compile) foo: Version: 4.2.1 Depends: foo4-shlibs, foo-bin (== 4.2.1) JMHO, Kyle Moffett > Max > -- --- > Max Horn > Software Developer > > email: <mailto:[E

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-02-24 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Sunday, February 24, 2002, at 08:20 , David R. Morrison wrote: > Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sunday, February 24, 2002, at 07:25 , Jeff Whitaker wrote: >>>> >>>> the .so for A::R and A::C both statically link to libapreq, which &g

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-02-24 Thread Kyle Moffett
able > DYLD_FORCE_FLAT_NAMESPACE may fix this. At least it has for me in > similar > situations with the python interpreter. Unfortunately, this tends to break other packages that need the two level namespace (Grrr.) Oh well, Kyle Moffett

Re: [Fink-devel] (Long) Fwd: Design Award for Best Mac OS X Open Source Port

2002-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 09:48 , Alexander Strange wrote: > Ack! Four copies of the same mail! I have had that problem too, today I even got a couple of extra copies of month old fink-devel mail from SourceForge. They must be trying something new.

Re: [Fink-devel] (Long) Fwd: Design Award for Best Mac OS X Open Source Port

2002-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
t of work, just look at the pure quantity of patches we have made to get stuff to work, then look at the package count (500 some last time I looked). We have done a heck of a lot! -Ben -- http://homepage.mac.com/bhines/ Kyle Moffett

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
> The problem is that both Apache::Request and Apache::Cookie link in > libapreq (statically). You can "use" one *or* the other in a given > mod_perl-enabled process, but if you try to "use" both, they both > publish the same libapreq's symbols, and you get a symbol clash. That is kind of weird,

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-02-21 Thread Kyle Moffett
re details. [...] > > On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 08:49 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> Therefore: The instability in Apache::Request (A part of mod_perl) >> may be due to the fact that mod_perl was unstable itself in the .so lib > > I wouldn't say so. I've had

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-02-19 Thread Kyle Moffett
te: > > On Sunday, January 27, 2002, at 03:55 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> In using Apache::ASP, I need to use Apache::Request, I think, and I >> think that is the cause for this error: >> >> parse_file_count check failed at T.pm line 33. <--> , >> b

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-02-19 Thread Kyle Moffett
ree packages to CVS (on the tracker) Thanks, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] new module help

2002-02-17 Thread Kyle Moffett
inline), I'll try to figure out what it is, then tell you why. Usually stuff like that is OSI-Approved, but i really can't tell till i've looked at it. > Thanks in advance for your help, You are very welcome > George Madrid > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kyle Moffett [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] On multi-target packages and how to implement them

2002-02-14 Thread Kyle Moffett
What I think is that instead of all this files business, we ought to simply allow InstallScript in SplitOffs, then all that would be needed is a few different install scripts, and very little extra perl code ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Fink-devel] Shared Libraries Policy, round 2

2002-02-13 Thread Kyle Moffett
rtain dependencies. Then the package would be built, and the seperate __variant installscripts would be run. Once finished, dpkg would be called several times (once for each __v ) to build the packages then one last time to install them all. IMHO, Kyle Moffett On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, at

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink and max. no. of inodes

2002-02-12 Thread Kyle Moffett
titions Maybe you should try this: 1. Reboot the computer and immediately hold down Cmd-Opt-S 2. Type fsck -y and press enter 3. Wait until done 4. Repeat steps 2-3 until no more problems show up ( I have seen some cases with errors so serious that one round didn't get them al

[Fink-devel] Problems compiling courier-imap

2002-02-06 Thread Kyle Moffett
g if wait3 function is broken... yes configure: error: I give up -- neither wait nor wait3 works properly configure: error: ./configure failed for waitlib Thanks, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/list

[Fink-devel] Link problems with bonobo

2002-02-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
Bonobo warns of multiple symbols for zlib stuff, and links with apple's version. Could we fix it so it always uses one version and doesn't look for/find the other. Our version is preferred over apple's version. Just curious, Kyle Moffett _

Re: [Fink-devel] XFree86 4.2/XDarwin installation failure

2002-02-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
Try this, at the terminal: % sudo fsck -y then a bunch of errors will get fixed and repair your installation. If it doesn't say FILESYSTEM MODIFIED, or if it still doesn't work, then something else is wrong other than a corrupt filesystem. HTH, Kyle Moffett On Monday, February 4

Re: [Fink-devel] XFree86 4.2/XDarwin installation failure

2002-02-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
t the chance, with your base partition HFS+ and your /sw on a UNIX. But Apple REALLY ought to fix the stability on that Just MHO, Kyle Moffett On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 09:06 , Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >>>>>> "Alexander" == Alexander Strange <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposing an XML Format

2002-02-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
lude", ldflags => "-L/sw/lib/bar/lib", [...] }, nox => { cppflags => "", ldflags => "", [...] }, }, [...] } Though ideally, xwindows support would be added (like variant xwin) instead of subtracted (like variant nox). Kyle Moffett

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposing an XML Format

2002-02-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Saturday, February 2, 2002, at 05:11 , Max Horn wrote: At 16:50 Uhr -0500 02.02.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: I would like to propose a format for XML info documents for Fink. [snip] Actually, in my mind, there is no difference at all - even the "final" format would be parsed into the

[Fink-devel] Proposing an XML Format

2002-02-02 Thread Kyle Moffett
Blah blah blah http://www.myhome.net/"/> Again, please comment on anything and everything you feel like! Thanks, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] shlibs (was: libpng)

2002-02-01 Thread Kyle Moffett
this. Agreed, though implementation should be done at about the same time, since both require XML or some derivative. > > Max Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] shlibs (was: libpng)

2002-01-31 Thread Kyle Moffett
used to customize the creation of those packages, even configure their dependancies automatically, have foo depend on one of libfoo or libfoo-dev, accordingly. > And maybe also take a look at this: > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html > > > Cheers, > > M

Re: [Fink-devel] Dpkg deleted my /etc directory

2002-01-30 Thread Kyle Moffett
careful about what > goes in the .deb file. When I am testing a new package, I always > build it before installing, and then run "dpkg --contents foo.deb" to > see what is there before I install. I am never going to break that advice ever again! > > -- Dave > K

[Fink-devel] Dpkg deleted my /etc directory

2002-01-30 Thread Kyle Moffett
nfig file, and a few other things. Darn!!! I'll be on for maybe another hour, so if anybody wants to suggest anything... Stupid computer! But at least it isn't Microsoft, it would have killed my HD at the driver level. Kyle Moffett ___ Fin

Re: [Fink-devel] -lcrypto

2002-01-29 Thread Kyle Moffett
we can't > simply require "Depends: openssl" because that will force gimp into > the crypto tree. We might need to figure out how to get gimp to compile without /usr/lib/libcrypto.dylib for the package 'gimp' > Any other thoughts or opinions about this? > >

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-01-27 Thread Kyle Moffett
In using Apache::ASP, I need to use Apache::Request, I think, and I think that is the cause for this error: parse_file_count check failed at T.pm line 33. <--> , blib/lib/Apache/ASP.pm line 1556 FAILED before any test output arrived What a HEADACHE!!! *:

Fwd: [Fink-devel] Net::SMTP conflicts

2002-01-27 Thread Kyle Moffett
t Net::SMTP module than is included in > libnet, If you check on CPAN, there are three available. First of all, > is there any way to use both or all three? I'd kind of like to send > email from ASP scripts. Also, do we have a BuildConflicts field

[Fink-devel] Net::SMTP conflicts

2002-01-27 Thread Kyle Moffett
from ASP scripts. Also, do we have a BuildConflicts field yet? Thanks, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-01-27 Thread Kyle Moffett
g work, or just packaging so that you can > have the benefits of the package management system? As above, so far all I have done is package stuff for Fink. > -Ken Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-01-24 Thread Kyle Moffett
Sure, will do as soon as I get everything done. Kyle Moffett On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 09:29 , David R. Morrison wrote: > At the very least, you could create all 15 .info files, wrap them up > into > a single .tar file, and put the .tar file onto the package submission

Re: [Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-01-24 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 09:20 , Jeremy Higgs wrote: > On 25/1/02 1:15 PM, "Kyle Moffett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I am attempting to create a slew of packages for Apache::ASP and all >> its >> dependancies, should I create them all, the

[Fink-devel] Perl Packages & Diff usage

2002-01-24 Thread Kyle Moffett
did it once successfully, but I have been having problems repeating the thing. Thanks, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] How to represent package variants

2002-01-22 Thread Kyle Moffett
removed) for variants Kyle Moffett On Monday, January 21, 2002, at 06:22 , Alexander Strange wrote: > I mean, would we have 'apt-get install xchat-ssl-nognome' or what? > On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 04:59 AM, Max Horn wrote: > >> At 9:42 Uhr + 19.01.2002, Fi

Re: [Fink-devel] plan

2002-01-20 Thread Kyle Moffett
.yinfo, though that would force everybody to know both formats. Just my two cents, Kyle Moffett On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 06:07 , Max Horn wrote: > At 9:43 Uhr +1100 21.01.2002, Matt Stephenson wrote: >> If we moved to a new package format I vote for XML, but I would also >&

Re: [Fink-devel] Functions in Fink::Services.pm

2002-01-20 Thread Kyle Moffett
le > values for a single key. It is mainly used to read in the list of > mirrors, where multiple mirros can be located on the same > continent/country. OK, Thanks! Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Functions in Fink::Services.pm

2002-01-20 Thread Kyle Moffett
I was looking through the fink perlmods, and I came across another function: read_properties_multival. Can someone (Max? Finlay?) please tell me what the difference and usage is between read_properties and read_properties_multival in Services.pm? Thanks, Kyle Moffett

Re: [Fink-devel] Basic XML Processor for .info Files is Done!

2002-01-19 Thread Kyle Moffett
gt; > Daniel None taken :-) Oh, and by the way, a good primer on xml, dtds, and xsl is available from O'Reilly books "XML Pocket Reference," ISBN 1-56592-709-5, though you might look to see if they have any newer/better/bigger books available, the one I have is a couple of year

Re: [Fink-devel] Basic XML Processor for .info Files is Done!

2002-01-19 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 05:22 , Max Horn wrote: > At 1:30 Uhr -0800 19.01.2002, Daniel Parks wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 07:06 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> >>> &g

[Fink-devel] Basic XML Processor for .info Files is Done!

2002-01-18 Thread Kyle Moffett
equest tracker shortly. requires the XML::DOM module Just doin my part, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] question about sub filename in Services.pm

2002-01-18 Thread Kyle Moffett
? Just want to help, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] How to represent package variants

2002-01-18 Thread Kyle Moffett
Just had another idea, for stuff like emacs-alpha, add an alpha variant, with a different version number, and make it non-default , so: if default is true, ask user if they want to install dependencies. if default is undef, install if all dependencies are already installed. if default is false,

Re: [Fink-devel] How to represent package variants

2002-01-18 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 06:04 , Max Horn wrote: At 17:08 Uhr -0500 18.01.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: I was originally looking at something like this and I have thought a lot about it, one of the main reasons to use xml for a new format was the necessary complexity. On Friday, January 18

Re: [Fink-devel] How to represent package variants

2002-01-18 Thread Kyle Moffett
I was originally looking at something like this and I have thought a lot about it, one of the main reasons to use xml for a new format was the necessary complexity. On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 02:48 , Max Horn wrote: > So, regardless which format we choose, we want to support package > va

Re: [Fink-devel] Initial 0.3.2a complete

2002-01-17 Thread Kyle Moffett
I actually use hdiutil much more frequently than anything else, it even has a decent command line interface. I worked out the options in 5 mins from `man hdiutil` It even gives example usages. On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 09:18 , Max Horn wrote: >> Curious: How do you make .dmg files?

Re: [Fink-devel] Optional usage of Storable.pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
, and blah-macosx, could be put into the same file. New logic for sorting out dependancies would be needed, but this is sort of a long term goal. Any comments are welcome! Just some ideas, Kyle Moffett On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 08:17 , Max Horn wrote: > Thanks, Kyle and Randal! I rea

Re: [Fink-devel] Optional usage of Storable.pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
Moffett On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 06:58 , Randal L. Schwartz wrote: >>>>>> "Kyle" == Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Kyle> I found a way to detect if Storable.pm exists, at runtime. Pulled > Kyle> this from the xml-simple

Re: [Fink-devel] xml-simple-pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
probably, though I might be wrong. On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 06:16 , Justin Hallett wrote: > you think it's an env problem? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> I think that this is one of the problems we are going to have more and >> more. The user's environments are not being cleaned for

Re: [Fink-devel] xml-simple-pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
Oh, and another weird thing, several -pm packages I have built were erroring like crazy, then I tried building in a clean shell, and they suddenly worked, oh and I did try that for this one, too, but I will try again. On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 06:13 , Justin Hallett wrote: > you seem

Re: [Fink-devel] xml-simple-pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
I think that this is one of the problems we are going to have more and more. The user's environments are not being cleaned for the make, make test, and make install. Without a clean environment, everything just about flies out the window. On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 06:13 , Justin Hal

Re: [Fink-devel] xml-simple-pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
[localhost:~] kyle% fink list pm Reading package info... Information about 664 packages read in 5 seconds. appconfig-pm1.52-1 Perl5 modules for reading configuration fil... i compress-zlib-p 1.16-1 Part of the info-zip zlib compression library data-showtable- 3.3-1

Re: [Fink-devel] xml-simple-pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
If I remove storable-pm, here's the error I get: t/4_MemShare2:DataCompare: expected 2 key(s) (one, two), got: 1 (server) 4:DataCompare: expected 2 key(s) (one, two), got: 1 (server) Use of uninitialized value in string ne at t/4_MemShare.t line 33. 1..7 not ok 1 not ok 2 ok 3 not ok 4 o

Re: [Fink-devel] xml-simple-pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
I got this error after I installed Storable.pm. The earlier error talked about Storable, so I installed it, but I don't think that fixed the underlying problem, because I then got the error I sent you. On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 05:52 , Justin Hallett wrote: > all this was after or be

Re: [Fink-devel] xml-simple-pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
that it depends on the Storable.pm module, aka >> storable-pm in fink. I verified this by running verbosely, several >> things aren't bothered, but the test t/4_MemShare.t fails without >> Storable.pm (As above, this was verified verbosely). Can you please >> add >>

Re: [Fink-devel] xml-simple-pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
t fails without >> Storable.pm (As above, this was verified verbosely). Can you please >> add >> that dependency? >> >> Thanks, >> Kyle Moffett > > ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., > Justin F. Hallett > CAIS

[Fink-devel] xml-simple-pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
m (As above, this was verified verbosely). Can you please add that dependency? Thanks, Kyle Moffett ___ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

[Fink-devel] Optional usage of Storable.pm

2002-01-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
"1..0\n"; exit 0; } # Potential Fink usage. eval ( require Storable; }; if ($INC{'Storable.pm'}) $somevar{'storable'} = 'True'; # or sub Storable { eval ( require Storable; ); $INC{'Storable.pm} } I thought that with this we coul

<    1   2