Re: [Fink-devel] Build fails for sdl-ttf

Am 16.07.2006 um 12:13 schrieb Martin Costabel: > Jens Noeckel wrote: >> Hi, >> With an-up-to-date fink (unstable) on both PPC and intel machines, >> I tried to install sdl-ttf but got the following linker error (on >> both systems): >> gcc -g -O2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include/f

Re: [Fink-devel] switch to fink.cvs.sourceforge.net

Am 13.05.2006 um 12:23 schrieb Martin Costabel: Now that cvs is up again, I guess everybody is reinventing the wheel in the form of a little one-liner to convert their local CVS repository to the new style. To save others the time for testing, here is one that worked for me (cut in four

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.4 unstable static?

Am 21.04.2006 um 04:53 schrieb David Fang: Jack Howarth wrote: Has work on the 10.4 branch stalled? I have noticed for the past several weeks that 'fink selfupdate' from the cvs doesn't seem to pull down any new updates. Only the messages about... cvs update: -m wrapper option is not s

Re: [Fink-devel] Good way for testing stable-readiness?

Am 07.04.2006 um 09:41 schrieb Daniel Macks: On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:32:10AM +0200, Max Horn wrote: Am 06.04.2006 um 18:35 schrieb Dave Vasilevsky: [...] Pretending that status is empty (nothing installed) is probably ok here. Maybe just assume that the current essential is

Re: [Fink-devel] Good way for testing stable-readiness?

Am 06.04.2006 um 18:35 schrieb Dave Vasilevsky: [...] Pretending that status is empty (nothing installed) is probably ok here. Maybe just assume that the current essential is installed? I'm not sure what's better. Should the status really be completely empty? What about virtual pac

Re: [Fink-devel] Good way for testing stable-readiness?

Am 05.04.2006 um 21:46 schrieb Dave Vasilevsky: On Apr 5, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: fink --trees=stable/main,stable/crypto,virtual rebuild foo Note that this is equivalent to fink --trees=stable,virtual rebuild foo Just to save you all some typing. :-) Yeah, but neither

[Fink-devel] Good way for testing stable-readiness?

Hi folks, I just wanted to move my gaim/gaim-ssl package in the 10.4* trees to stable. But then I stopped, and wondered: Can I? Problem is, in the recent past I did some moves to stable which turned out to be bad because I missed the fact that some of my deps weren't in stable yet. Now, o

[Fink-devel] Merge fink ChangeLogs?

While looking through the fink codebase in CVS, I noticed that we still use a separate ChangeLog for each directory. To be frank, I do not know why we ever made this separation (it simply existed from day one), but now that I have some distance from the code (not having worked on it for a v

Re: [Fink-devel] Common splitoff for a package with variants

Am 28.03.2006 um 13:28 schrieb Martin Costabel: Max Horn wrote: [] As a solution, I currently think of this setup: Add another splitoff FOO-common to FOO. Move all the common stuff there. Leave FOO itself mostly empty. Add "Depends: FOO-common" to the PMs, and add Depends on

Re: [Fink-devel] Common splitoff for a package with variants

Thanks for the reply Daniel. This was about what I expected :-). The current way the package is setup is as follows: The "FOO" (i.e. "polymake") package has a typed splitoff (i.e. really multiple ones), one for "each" perl version (5.8.1 and 5.8.6 at this point). They can co-exist. The mai

[Fink-devel] Common splitoff for a package with variants

Hi folks, I was wondering: Is there any sane way to specify a "common" splitoff for a package with variants? The background for this questions it the polymake package on our package submission tracker sourceforge.net/tracker/? func=detail&atid=414256&aid=1114201&group_id=17203>, but I am now

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: FYI: SDL change

Am 22.03.2006 um 01:13 schrieb David R. Morrison: Max, I've just expanded the message which fink gives to users upon a compile failure. If the user is on intel hardware, after the suggestion to email the maintainer appears the sentence: "Note that many fink package maintainers do not (y

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: FYI: SDL change

Am 21.03.2006 um 15:59 schrieb David R. Morrison: On Mar 20, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Max Horn wrote: Well, in my eyes, those "rights" were already severely cut when those packages where moved to the intel tree, without the maintainers being involved in anyway. Again, I unde

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: FYI: SDL change

Am 21.03.2006 um 04:08 schrieb Koen van der Drift: Sometimes one of the core maintainers is doing a batch update of many packages. Would it be required in such a situation to contact the maintainers first? That could take many weeks in the worst case. And mostly it is a change that is not

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: FYI: SDL change

Am 21.03.2006 um 02:45 schrieb Alexander K. Hansen: [...] I think we can all agree that fixing typos requires no particular expertise with the package in question (and saves the maintainer from being inundated with messages about the problem). Indeed, fully agreed. That is, as long as the p

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: FYI: SDL change

Am 19.03.2006 um 23:10 schrieb Trevor Harmon: On Mar 19, 2006, at 1:04 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: [...] It makes sense to, by default, defer to the person who understands that software well enough to package it, when questions arise. But this can still be the default in the model I pro

[Fink-devel] Re: FYI: SDL change

Am 17.03.2006 um 20:27 schrieb Benjamin Reed: I've updated SDL so that sdl-config uses the -Wl, format for passing framework args (ie, turn "-framework Foo" into "-Wl,-framework,Foo") Otherwise some versions of libtool will try to reorder them, or render the 2nd part of the argument to the rel

Re: [Fink-devel] SDL-mixer patch for fink

Am 14.03.2006 um 03:31 schrieb David R. Morrison: On Mar 12, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Max Horn wrote: [...] Max, I'd like to move this to stable pretty soon. Please let me know if you are aware of any problems with doing so. I can't really comment on this. I have no Intel syste

Re: [Fink-devel] SDL-mixer patch for fink

Am 12.03.2006 um 02:22 schrieb David R. Morrison: On Mar 11, 2006, at 3:51 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: On Mar 10, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Keith Conger wrote: Hi Max, A couple packages of mine depend on SDL_mixer so I decided to try to fix on 10.4 intel. Looks like the fixes were in SDL_mixer cv

Re: [Fink-devel] SDL-mixer patch for fink

Am 12.03.2006 um 00:51 schrieb Daniel Johnson: On Mar 10, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Keith Conger wrote: Hi Max, A couple packages of mine depend on SDL_mixer so I decided to try to fix on 10.4 intel. Looks like the fixes were in SDL_mixer cvs already. So I've include a patch and update info fil

[Fink-devel] ethereal in 0.8.0 bindist

Hi there, I was wondering if we still can't upload fixed packages for the 0.8.0 bin dist... in particular, I am recently again swamped by mails complaining about ethereal-0.10.9-11 problems (besides other things it is missing a dep on gtk+2). I fixed those ages ago, but I still keep getti

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink cocoa tool

Am 09.01.2006 um 02:25 schrieb Koen van der Drift: On Jan 7, 2006, at 6:38 PM, Kevin Horton wrote: As far as build/rebuild goes, it would be good to be able to set/ unset the -k and -K flags. Buttons or menu items to open the build and install directories in the Finder would be nice too.

[Fink-devel] ethereal in bindist back to old version?

Hi folks, the ethereal 0.10.9-11 package in the bindist used to be broken (in several ways). Hence I replaced it in stable by version 0.10.12, and somebody (I think drm) updated the bindist with a new .deb made from that version. From this point on, whenever people mailed me about problem

Re: [Fink-devel] pdb.finkproject.org seems unreachable

Am 18.11.2005 um 14:26 schrieb Freek Dijkstra: Hi, The "Packages" page as linked on fink.sf.net, points to http:// pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/index.php?phpLang=en But that URL is unreachable for me. A short investigation showed that none of it's name servers (ns1.middle--earth.org. and ns2.m

Re: [Fink-devel] [OTAnn] Feedback

Am 07.11.2005 um 22:11 schrieb shenanigans: I was interested in getting feedback from current mail group users. We have mirrored your mail list in a new application that provides a more aggregated and safe environment which utilizes the power of broadband. Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01

[Fink-devel] Fink bin installer issue / improvement

Hi folks, once again a university colleague of mine attempted to install Fink on his OS X machine (and iBook with OS X 10.4.3), and once again, an issue occurred. This time, the installer refused to work with this error message: "Fink Installer: Macintosh HD does not support symlinks" T

Re: [Fink-devel] Binary Installer (0.8.0) not very usable on a non-dev system

Am 05.10.2005 um 09:25 schrieb Martin Costabel: Max Horn wrote: [] He then got an error message by the installer, telling him about a problem setting up his .profile. Luckily I was around and he knew that I was somehow affiliated with this "Fink thingy". And indeed I manag

[Fink-devel] Binary Installer (0.8.0) not very usable on a non-dev system

Yo folks, in the following I'd like to tell you a little story that happened to me today... it is, unfortunately, kind of a sad story, but I hope we can turn it into one with a happy ending eventually :-) A friend of mine (a fellow student) recently acquired an iBook, and now wanted to i

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Maximum redirects followed

An alternate approach would be to just tell curl to follow redirects. From the curl manpage: -L/--location (HTTP/HTTPS) If the server reports that the requested page has a different location (indicated with the header line Location:) this

Re: [Fink-devel] aqua native software

Am 14.08.2005 um 15:43 schrieb David R. Morrison: [...] Actually, Max, while you were away we had agreed that packaging aqua .apps was OK. Sure. That doesn't change what I said in my last mail, though -- only what I then (incorrectly, apparatnely) said in my first mail. I still strongly

Re: [Fink-devel] aqua native software

Am 14.08.2005 um 10:17 schrieb Martin Costabel: Max Horn wrote: Am 14.08.2005 um 07:45 schrieb Ben Willmore: [Sorry if these are FAQs. Gmane archive search seems to be broken] 1. Some of my favourite unix programs ((x)emacs, unison) now have good aqua-native versions. I notice these

Re: [Fink-devel] aqua native software

Am 14.08.2005 um 07:45 schrieb Ben Willmore: [Sorry if these are FAQs. Gmane archive search seems to be broken] 1. Some of my favourite unix programs ((x)emacs, unison) now have good aqua-native versions. I notice these are not available through Fink. Are aqua ports against Fink policy, o

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink documentation: Quite a sorry affair :-/

Am 30.07.2005 um 21:16 schrieb Alexander Hansen: Blanket commentary--I'm seemingly the only one working extensively with the general docs, and lets face it, when I spend 65 hours a week at work or in transit (and now I'm working on work-related stuff on the train more often than I have bee

Re: [Fink-devel] libggetext3

Am 04.08.2005 um 13:22 schrieb Dave Vasilevsky: On Aug 4, 2005, at 6:05 AM, Max Horn wrote: Alas, libggetext3 isn't in stable (yet). My question: Are there plans to move it to stable soon? Max, Because libgettext3 and gettext-dev conflict, the Fink dependency engine has to be ab

Re: [Fink-devel] Source that requires registration and its license

Am 05.08.2005 um 07:08 schrieb BABA Yoshihiko: Hi all, I wnat to make a package of ECW (http://www.ermapper.com/downloads/default.aspx#1) and have several issues. Is there any packaging guideline for the programmes that require user registeration for download (see URL above) ? No. I am not

[Fink-devel] SF.net dev CVS will be offline 2005-08-09

FYI: Max --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-D

[Fink-devel] libggetext3

Hi folks, I recently moved the latest xchat to stable, but now I notice that this was a mistake : The package depends on libgettext3 these days (my attempt to contribute to the transition). Alas, libggetext3 isn't in stable (yet). My question: Are there plans to move it to stable soon?

[Fink-devel] Fink documentation: Quite a sorry affair :-/

Yo folks, I was tending to many old open bug reports on our tracker for the past two weeks. During this time, I had to advice people several times on how to properly upgrade their fink/Fink, X11 and other things. This lead me to consult our docs. What I saw was somewhat saddening :-/. I

[Fink-devel] Treatment of virtual packages, Version 2

I am sorry, I accidentally hit the sent button so you got a garbled message! Anyway: With this mail I'd like to point to an inconsistency in fink's usage, and want to give everybody a chance to comment on proposed plans on how to resolve this... For the "historic" background of this, pleas

[Fink-devel] Treatment of virtual packages

[For the "historic" background of this, please refer to sourceforge.net/tracker/? func=detail&atid=117203&aid=755128&group_id=17203>] Hi there, currently, Fink supports two kind of "virtual packages": * runtime virtuals, created by fink. Th

Re: [Fink-devel] gfortran package

Am 28.07.2005 um 19:48 schrieb Jack Howarth: Still one has to ask exactly which compilers in the gcc4 package we should be focusing on? The gfortran compiler specifically is making really good progress. With patches to be added today, it should pass almost all of the NIST Fortran validation

Re: [Fink-devel] ethereal in bindist broken

In addition to the 10.3 binary being broken (thanks to Alexander K. Hansen for verifying this), it seems that the 0.10.9-11 binary has some missing dependencies. All of those are fixed in the current stable version. So if possible it would be nice if that could be used for the bindist inste

[Fink-devel] ethereal in bindist broken

Hi there, I got some reports which indicate that the ethereal binary in the 10.3 bindist is broken (the .deb is missing the ethereal binary itself). I haven't confirmed this yet, but despite this, I wonder: What exactly would be the process these days to get a broken .deb in the bindist r

[Fink-devel] sed package

Hi Sylvain, I've contacted you about this before but unfortunately didn't get any reply (I guess your job is keeping you busy). The sed package which you maintain is currently at version 4.1. The latest version is 4.1.4. That wouldn't be a problem, but 4.1 contains some pretty nasty bugs,

Re: [Fink-devel] Web site: How to use 'include' correctly

Am 14.06.2005 um 06:31 schrieb BABA Yoshihiko: Hi, I opened fink.sourceforge.net/index.php and still got the include error. Simply reloading fixed it. No surprise :-). As I mentioned, the include directive is still used incorrectly in various places. I recommend grepping for "include" throu

[Fink-devel] Web site: How to use 'include' correctly

Hi there, not sure if this is best place to direct it, but for those working on the website: Please be careful about how you use the PHP "include" command, and related commands. In this specific case, the hostlogo.inc file was included incorrectly: namely, just like this: include "hostlog

[Fink-devel] PDB broken?

To quote : "The database was last updated at 04:17 GMT on Monday, June 06 and currently lists 180 packages in 23 sections." Max --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. How far can you sho

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Faster installation of fink systems - a proposal

Am 23.05.2005 um 23:32 schrieb Chris Zubrzycki: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On May 23, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Benn Newman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I know of something used in Debian GNU+Linux that sounds is somewhat (it is a little of a stretch) w

[Fink-devel] Fwd: Fink SDL error on 10.4

Hi, I just got yet another bug report on the SDL package on 10.4. The problem is, that apparently the stable package doesn't compile on OS X, despite our homepage claiming this: "The stable tree contains substantially fewer packages than in 10.3, but all of them should compile." Now, I do

[Fink-devel] Test, trying to reach fink-devel

It seems I can't send any mails to fink mailing lists anymore -- sorry if you get this testmail multiple times. Cheers, Max --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 grea

[Fink-devel] Re: [fink-seed] findutils problem

[Apparently I can't send to fink-seed, so I am now resending this to fink-devel. sorry if anybody gest this multiple times] Am 19.04.2005 um 19:36 schrieb Chris Zubrzycki: On Apr 19, 2005, at 12:51 PM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: When I run updatedb from findutils in fink, I get this error: Does /usr

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

Am 07.02.2005 um 14:22 schrieb Peter O'Gorman: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Peter, Daniel Macks wrote: | | That raises an interesting question: are we going to bump %r on each | package we change to this new SHLIB_DEPS form? I am obviously missing something by skim reading this

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

To clarify this once more (Justin just left IRC when I talked to him about this right now, it seems I am touching the feelings of some people here): The Depends field *always* implied both a install time and a compile time dependency. This has been so from day 1 of Fink's existence. It has alw

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

Am 06.02.2005 um 23:56 schrieb TheSin: On 6-Feb-05, at 3:43 PM, Max Horn wrote: The whole discussion is not new of course -- this was discussed years ago. My suggestion back then was to add an explicit "RuntimeDepends" field for this, and migrate over to that. I don't really s

Re: [Fink-devel] Proposed Policy Change for all Maintainers IMPORTANT

Am 05.02.2005 um 17:01 schrieb TheSin: With the upcoming shlibs change, the packaging engine needs to be changed a little and this will break many packages. first let me explain the shlibs change. Basically fink will beable to automatically insert all share library deps to the Depends line by

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: GCC field

Am 10.12.2004 um 08:11 schrieb D. Höhn: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Peter O'Gorman wrote: | Daniel E. Macks wrote: | |> David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: |> |>> I thus propose to rename the GCC field, calling it GCC-ABI instead. |> |> |> |> Sounds good to me. | | |

Re: [Fink-devel] Safari crashes on fink secure login?

Am 30.08.2004 um 20:04 schrieb David R. Morrison: On Aug 29, 2004, at 12:59 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: On Aug 29, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: I wanted to check that I'm not the only one seeing this. Under MacOS X 10.3.5, I find that Safari crashes whenever I try to login to the secur

Re: [Fink-devel] fink gcc?

Am 25.08.2004 um 19:40 schrieb David R. Morrison: The troubles with g++ under XCode 1.5 and the lack of any quick response from Apple, combined with earlier incidents of an analogous nature, lead me to ask: would we be better off with a fink gcc package in place of the Developer Tools? As I und

Re: [Fink-devel] Security issues in ethereal

Am 08.08.2004 um 09:23 schrieb Peter O'Gorman: Max Horn wrote: Fixing this is non-trivial, I am afraid . I have tried to do it back when 0.10.4 came out, but so far didn't have success, and also lack time. If somebody wants to do the work and send me the .info files, fine, I can lo

Re: [Fink-devel] Security issues in ethereal

Am 06.08.2004 um 17:20 schrieb Blair Zajac: Hi Max, Saw this security issue for ethereal from my RedHat alert emails: http://www.ethereal.com/appnotes/enpa-sa-00015.html According to this page, they gave it a high security warning and "It may be possible to make Ethereal crash or run arbitrary cod

Re: [Fink-devel] cvs-1.11.17-1 woes

Am 20.06.2004 um 18:48 schrieb rand: curl doesn't accept self signed certs i think, is their one self signed? Nobody really accepts self signed certs. E.g. surf to the page via Safari, and you'll also get a warning/error message. After all, if I show you a piece of paper on which is written "I

[Fink-devel] cvs-1.11.17-1 woes

Hi there, when trying to update to cvs-1.11.17-1, I get the error following below. Given that this is meant to be a security update of CVS, the error is extremely unnerving... Maybe it's just that they have their web site setup incorrectly; or maybe they were hacked. In either case, maybe you c

Re: [Fink-devel] dosbox and -noprebind

Am 24.04.2004 um 15:01 schrieb Martin Costabel: This has come up a couple of times on fink-users and on fink-beginners. No ideas have come forward so far and the maintainer (Max) seems unresponsive: I already fixed it. Regarding being "unresponsive", I got the first mail about this subject a f

[Fink-devel] Re: make (3.80) update required

Am 07.04.2004 um 16:03 schrieb Khairulmizam Samsudin: Hi, I'm compiling an osx->i386 cross compiler using crosstool-0.28-rc1 [1] and i'm having a problem with the current make (3.79) in fink. I came across the error when compiling glibc.The error is something like below. (Sorry i dont have the

Re: [Fink-devel] mirror:sourceforge:/

Am 08.04.2004 um 13:56 schrieb Peter O'Gorman: Max Horn wrote: Am 08.04.2004 um 06:16 schrieb Peter O'Gorman: Hi, I just committed a change to every package which had specified 'Source: mirror:sourceforge:/foo/foo.tar.gz' because they fail to fetch from sourceforge, as Mart

Re: [Fink-devel] mirror:sourceforge:/

Am 08.04.2004 um 06:16 schrieb Peter O'Gorman: Hi, I just committed a change to every package which had specified 'Source: mirror:sourceforge:/foo/foo.tar.gz' because they fail to fetch from sourceforge, as Martin reported recently. HUm, OK. But is the proper fix underway as well? That is, fixi

Re: [Fink-devel] aolserver

Am 24.03.2004 um 02:01 schrieb David Chin: Hi, I am attempting to package up aolserver, and have a couple of questions: 1. installation prefix -- aolserver is much less hairy to deal with if it were installed in /sw/aolserver. But, that goes against the recommendations in the devel FAQ. O

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: unclear how to truly set up a package =/

Am 24.03.2004 um 00:33 schrieb Peter O'Gorman: Daniel E. Macks wrote: Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:47:46PM -0500, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: Set these variables: export CPPFLAGS=-I/sw/include export LDFLAGS=-L/sw/lib export LD_PREBIND=1

Re: [Fink-devel] ieeefp.h library missing in 10.3!!!

Am 22.03.2004 um 11:02 schrieb David Ruau: Hello, I am trying to install a software witch require the ieeefp.h library. That's not a library, it's merely a header file (possibly there exists a related library, though). Does anyone know where I can find this library. Or witch package should I i

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/net xchat.info,1.3,1.4

Am 22.03.2004 um 23:18 schrieb TheSin: Won't that change the deb file ? No. BuildDepends are of course still there, if you care to take a look. Only the run time dep on python was removed. Bye, Max --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM

Re: [Fink-devel] sources.list

Am 20.03.2004 um 17:08 schrieb Peter O'Gorman: David R. Morrison wrote: My idea was that fink should actually write (or modify) the sources.list file. If you update the mirror choices, fink would write the correct entry into sources.list. In order to allow users to include unofficial binary d

[Fink-devel] Changed Direct Download URLs for Fink - HELP!

modifying the "sources.list" files to point at an URL of our own choice and under our own control. This then can forward to the SF.net download URL, and can be updated in the future if you have to make other URL changes. And if we ever get our own servers/mirrors, we can switch all ou

Re: [Fink-devel] bindist URLs dead

Am 20.03.2004 um 11:09 schrieb Martin Costabel: It seems the sourceforge clowns did it again: They changed the download directory names so that apt-get is running into "404 not found" errors. Their timing is also perfect, synchronized with the appearance of the new Fink bindist, so that the new

Re: [Fink-devel] mpeg2dec vs. libmpeg2

Am 15.03.2004 um 00:39 schrieb Keith Conger: Oh forgot, maybe this should be done to a52dec also? Indeed! Same story there, it should really be called liba52, with a52dec a splitoff Cheers, Max --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Li

Re: [Fink-devel] mpeg2dec vs. libmpeg2

Am 15.03.2004 um 00:35 schrieb Keith Conger: Hi Max, I've been trying to contact Matt for awhile now, I actually updated the package to the latest version and committed to unstable. I'd also like to move it to stable for GNOME. Should we make these changes first? Definitely better to do it wh

Re: [Fink-devel] Zsh Broke init.sh Again

Am 13.03.2004 um 10:31 schrieb James Devenish: Hi, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:43:49AM -0500, Gary Kerbaugh wrote: The latest version of zsh breaks the append_path() and prepend_path() functions in the /sw/bin/init.sh script. They still add elements to the path but t

[Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-i18n] Last chance to vote/suggest the new i18n domain

Am 10.03.2004 um 22:57 schrieb David H.: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 fink-i18n.info finki18n.info fink-i18n.org finki18n.org Please vote for only one. Please put down any better domain names you can come up with. I want this done by Monday, so expect a fast moving decision

[Fink-devel] mpeg2dec vs. libmpeg2

[I am CC'ing this to fink-devel so that other people get a chance to point out potential problems with this] Hi Matt, I was wondering if you think it's possible to rename mpeg2dec (partially) to libmpeg2. Lemme first explain the why, and then the how (as I imagine it) :-) Why --- * The proje

[Fink-devel] Re: web/xml/users-guide uguide.cn.xml,NONE,1.1

Am 29.02.2004 um 12:41 schrieb Darian Lanx: Update of /cvsroot/fink/web/xml/users-guide In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv7872 Added Files: uguide.cn.xml Log Message: Added Chinese, thanks to Jeff Ye (is your first name really Jeff? ) This is incorrect. "cn" is not the

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: web fink.css,1.15,1.16

Am 28.02.2004 um 19:57 schrieb Darian Lanx: Max Horn wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/web In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv19012 Modified Files: fink.css Log Message: make legal.php look less ugly It was intended for legal.php NOT to span the whole page for a very

[Fink-devel] Reminder: Always use update.sh when working on the shell server!

Just a reminder to all of you (and we really should put this into some kind of documentation on the webpage eventually): whenever you work on something on the shell server (be it the web pages, be it the PDB), don't forget that others on the team must be able to modify what you did, too. So in

[Fink-devel] Updating the online web site

Yo folks, this is just a reminder: if you are modifying the web site, and want to make your changes online, please *always* use the "update.sh" script we provide for this purpose. Otherwise the file permissions get screwed up and your fellow team members won't be able to modify the website pro

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: ERR: web website : Sections: Packages : 141

Am 04.02.2004 um 02:53 schrieb Ben Hines: [...] I believe this is not our fault. SF's SQL server is simply hosed today. This has happened in the past, nothing unusual. Indeed, all other projects are affected, too. SF.net staff is looking into it - seems some project is doing something improper

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: ERR: web website : Sections: Packages : 141

Am 03.02.2004 um 11:14 schrieb Darian Lanx: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Daniel E. Macks wrote: Okay, what's the situation with indexing? In the past 10 minutes it's gone from 270ish to 540ish. That makes fink look pretty crappy and/or the PDB essentially worthless. I don't

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/perlmods getopt-long-pm.info,1.1,1.2 getopt-long-pm581.info,1.1,1.2

Am 03.02.2004 um 05:13 schrieb TheSin: damnit...it really doesn't affect anything other then I have to reversion things from their original versionswhy is this bad...can anyone tell, I did lots of test and dpkg doesn't give a crap about it. BTW Dan I'm not mad at you, just I don't agree wit

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: ERR: web website : Sections: Packages : 141

Am 02.02.2004 um 22:34 schrieb Daniel E. Macks: Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Lloyd Budd wrote: The search is not working "well" on the fink Sourceforge website. Maybe because it only knows about 141 packages: http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/list.php Might have gotten it in the middle of

Re: [Fink-devel] Ethereal/GTK still broke?

Am 30.01.2004 um 00:09 schrieb Zach Berke: Hi, I see a thread from about 1 1/2 months ago regarding a new version of GTK breaking ethereal. Is it still broke? I'm getting the same errors people were reporting a while ago. What's the fix? How do I apply the patch that was posted and stil

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/rubymods imlib2-rb.info,NONE,1.1 imlib2-rb18.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb18.info,NONE,1.1 opengl-rb18.patch,NONE,1.1

Am 15.01.2004 um 12:34 schrieb Daniel Macks: Matthias Neeracher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/libs/rubymods Added Files: imlib2-rb.info imlib2-rb18.info opengl-rb.info opengl-rb18.info opengl-rb18.patch Log Message: Committing inaugural ruby

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-gnome-core black hole

Am 12.01.2004 um 16:23 schrieb Martin Costabel: I think it was a bad idea to advise people to use the gnome-core mailing list as a write-only list. This would work only under the condition that Keith is sitting there and answering all messages (which he obviously can't, even supposing he knew a

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.518,1.518.2.1 Engine.pm,1.156,1.156.2.1 PkgVersion.pm,1.209,1.209.2.1 SourceItem.pm,1.1,1.1.2.1

Am 11.01.2004 um 23:31 schrieb Ben Hines: If there is anything we don't need it is to slow down indexing. I don't care how much cleaner it makes the code, we need to index constantly. It needs to be fast. -Ben On Jan 11, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: Switch to an object-oriented and c

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS conflict detection

Am 11.01.2004 um 00:21 schrieb Ben Hines: Fink should be able to realize what this is: WARNING: Unable to parse the line "<<< libbonobo2.info" in "/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/libbonobo2.info". WARNING: Unable to parse the line "===" in "/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finki

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-maintainer-gaim :: gaim >= 0.71 please

Am 09.01.2004 um 01:37 schrieb Lloyd Budd: Hi Max, Thank you for all the amazing work you do for all of us Fink users! I am wondering if we can get GAIM >= 0.71 in to stable (0.6.2) ? We can't get anything into 0.6.2 - that's a fixed release :-). As for gaim, look at http://fink.sourceforge.ne

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.509,1.510 Validation.pm,1.93,1.94

Am 08.01.2004 um 16:06 schrieb TheSin: not sure I wanted a Co-Maintainer field but was told to list them both, and just cause the PDB ignores it, doesn't make it wrong, maybe the docs sure be revised along with the pdb? So packages need more then one maintainer IMHO Having two maintainer for a

Re: [Fink-devel] Hey there, folks, it's tracker time again

Am 08.01.2004 um 04:39 schrieb Daniel Macks: On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:16:02PM -0500, Kevin Horton wrote: At 20:35 -0500 7/1/04, you wrote: How about subscribing to the fink trackers mailing list and have procmail call a script that updates your thing based on that? Given that the messages are in

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.18.0

I commited some more fixes for the dep code to CVS, please try. One thing I just spent an hour researching turned out to be not a bug: I currently have freetype-hinting-shlibs installed. When doing a "fink install freetype", it says: The following package will be installed or updated: freetyp

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.505,1.506 Engine.pm,1.152,1.153

Am 06.01.2004 um 22:36 schrieb TheSin: okay then I'll wait to split it out...I'm only half done anyhow. By the way, you still didn't answer my question - namely what exactly are you "splitting", and in what way? Max --- This SF.net email is

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.505,1.506 Engine.pm,1.152,1.153

Am 06.01.2004 um 20:13 schrieb TheSin: this is exactly where I was before I changed it. I'll look deeper into now that I have it separated it's easier for me to track it. I already see the cause of this. I'll work on a fix a bit later. I'll try to clean up resolve_depends() while I am at it (it

[Fink-devel] Re: fink/perlmod/Fink ChangeLog,1.505,1.506 Engine.pm,1.152,1.153

Am 06.01.2004 um 19:50 schrieb Daniel Macks: In gmane.os.apple.fink.cvs, you said: Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink/perlmod/Fink In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv28331 Modified Files: ChangeLog Engine.pm Log Message: fix regression I reported on fink-devel (with swi-prolog as example). Relative

Re: [Fink-devel] fink builds twice

Am 06.01.2004 um 17:01 schrieb TheSin: break it how, the 0-2 switch ? Cause I just explained that, i didn't want to change it, Clef and drm and other where upset that some depends had to be present in builddepends as well. But in my mind that is correct, they disagreed with me so I changed it

Re: [Fink-devel] fink builds twice

Am 06.01.2004 um 16:04 schrieb jfm: On Jan 6, 2004, at 12:05 PM, Max Horn wrote: After all, relatives of a package can't (and mustn't) be build dependencies of the package, since they are built at *exactly the same time*. So it wouldn't even make sense to have such a dependency

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >