an understand
> what you are saying?
>
>
> Sung
>
>
> --
> *From:* Fis on behalf of Francesco Rizzo <
> 13francesco.ri...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 21, 2018 6:11 AM
> *To:* y...@pku.edu.cn
> *Cc:* FIS Group
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Fi
tual leap from networks, information,
> communication, and language to sound?
>
> Koichiro: Focusing upon languaging comes to shed light on the
> communication in time between whatever parties.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Xueshan
>
>
>
> *From:* Stanley N Sa
inghamton.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 11:44 PM
To: y...@pku.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [Fis] The unification of the theories of information based on the
cateogry theory
Xueshan -- My {language {signal {information}}} is meant apply only to a system
that has language. That is, my assertion would be
olar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJ&hl=en
-- Original Message --
From: "Koichiro Matsuno"
To: "Fis,"
Sent: 2/15/2018 5:53:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Fis] The unification of the theories of information based
on the cateogry theory
On 8 Feb 2018 at 4:05 PM, Loet
On 8 Feb 2018 at 4:05 PM, Loet Leydesdorff wrote:
>From a biological perspective, not language itself, but “languaging” behavior
>is considered the system of reference.
On 13 Feb 2018 at 7:01 PM, Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic wrote:
As in biology thre are different kinds of organisms there are also
tion Science Information Science
Cc : Terry Deacon; Christophe Menant
Objet : Re: [Fis] The unification of the theories of information based on the
cateogry theory
Hi All,
I want to pick on Christophe’s post to make a general plea about FIS posting.
This is not a comment on meaning generation by agents.
] The unification of the theories of information based on the
cateogry theory
Hi All,
I want to pick on Christophe’s post to make a general plea about FIS posting.
This is not a comment on meaning generation by agents. Christophe wrote:
"Keeping in mind that communications exist only be
; Terrence W. DEACON
Cc : FIS Group
Objet : RE: [Fis] The unification of the theories of information based on the
cateogry theory
Dear Christophé
I think you hit on a most interesting problem of how to establish
interpretation and agency in a philosophical framework that is compatible trans
: 13. februar 2018 14:20
To: Terrence W. DEACON
Cc: FIS Group
Subject: Re: [Fis] The unification of the theories of information based on the
cateogry theory
Dear Terry and FISers,
It looks indeed reasonable to position the term 'language' as ‘simply referring
to the necessity of a sha
Hi All,
I want to pick on Christophe’s post to make a general plea about FIS posting.
This is not a comment on meaning generation by agents. Christophe wrote:
"Keeping in mind that communications exist only because agents need to manage
meanings for given purposes”.
This seems to imply that
vero
Objet : Re: [Fis] The unification of the theories of information based on the
cateogry theory
To claim that:
"without a language, no communication would be possible"
one must be using the term "language" in a highly metaphoric sense.
Is scent marking a language?
s, pleae let me know.
All the best.
Sung
(My time is out. I am signing out in a hurry.)
From: Fis mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es>>
on behalf of Xueshan Yan
mailto:y...@pku.edu.cn>>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 6:31 AM
To: FIS Group
Cc: 'Jose Javier Blan
ef931e64057ce6142b1f2f7b919612d2b3f42c07f559f5be33be0881613ccfbf5b43c4b&data=02%7C01%7Csji%40pharmacy.rutgers.edu%7Cd21bd1ad9ddf46d01a3e08d5720c681d%7Cb92d2b234d35447093ff69aca6632ffe%7C1%7C0%7C636540320007030420&sdata=2buOZeZpeC9UCNIIuY6bVfAr%2B4yOET6l35UU6ZwMhdU%3D&reserved=0>）
t;>> As for any information transmission system, if we pay more attention to
>>>> its transmission carrier instead of its transmission content, we are used
>>>> to employing "signal transmission" instead of "signal transduction". From
>>>> the tradit
o.ri...@gmail.com>
13francesco.ri...@gmail.com>; Terrence W. DEACON < <mailto:dea...@berkeley.edu>
dea...@berkeley.edu>
Cc: Fis, < <mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es> fis@listas.unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [Fis] The unification of the theories of information based on the
cateogry t
t;> 1. Do Plants Think? (June 5, 2012, *Scientific American*)
>>>
>>> (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-plants-think-d
>>> aniel-chamovitz/#rd?sukey=fc78a68049a14bb24ce82efd8ef931e640
>>> 57ce6142b1f2f7b919612d2b3f42c07f559f5be33be0881613ccfbf5b43c4b）
>>>
>>> 2. Pla
Sungchul-Ji,
What about information theories that belong to different categories,
i.e. other than the category of sets,
and which, equally have different Omega Structures
in their corresponding Topos?
Best wishes,
Alex
On 7 February 2018 at 19:16, Sungchul Ji wrote:
> Hi FISers,
>
>
> On 10
Space Society. Founding Board Member: Epic of Evolution Society. Founding Board
Member, The Darwin Project.
-Original Message-
From: Xueshan Yan
To: FIS Group
Sent: Sat, Feb 10, 2018 3:23 am
Subject: Re: [Fis] The unification of the theories of information based on the
cateogry theory
k-feel-and-learn
> > > )
> > >
> > > From which we can judge whether or not a plants informatics
> > > can exists.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > &
e0881613ccfbf5b43c4b）
>>
>> 2. Plants Can Think, Feel and Learn (December 3, 2014, *New Scientist*)
>>
>> (http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22429980-400-root-int
>> elligence-plants-can-think-feel-and-learn)
>>
>> From which we can judge whether or not a
we can judge whether or not a plants informatics can exists.
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Xueshan
>
>
>
> *From:* fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es]
> *On Behalf Of *Sungchul Ji
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 8, 2018 9:10 PM
> *To:* Fra
judge whether or not a plants informatics can exists.
Best wishes,
Xueshan
From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On
Behalf Of Sungchul Ji
Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 9:10 PM
To: Francesco Rizzo <13francesco.ri...@gmail.com>; Terrence W. DEACON
Cc: Fis
;
Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 2:56:11 AM
To: Terrence W. DEACON
Cc: Fis,; Sungchul Ji
Subject: Re: [Fis] The unification of the theories of information based on the
cateogry theory
Caro Terry estensibile a tutti,
è sempre un piacere leggerTi e capirTi. La general theory of information è
Caro Terry estensibile a tutti,
è sempre un piacere leggerTi e capirTi. La general theory of information è
preceduta da un sistema (o semiotica) di significazione e seguita da un
sistema (o semiotica ) di comunicazione. Tranne che quando si ha un
processo comunicativo come il passaggio di un Segna
Dear Terry and colleagues,
In the Biology of Language and Knowledge, Maturana (1978, pp. 56 ff.)
considered the biologist using biological discourse a super-observer,
analytically to be distinguished from the languaging animals under
study. He formulated as follows:
Human beings can talk a
Dear FISers,
In previous posts I have disparaged using language as the base model for
building a general theory of information.
Though I realize that this may seem almost heretical, it is not a claim
that all those who use linguistic analogies are wrong, only that it can be
causally misleading.
I
In principle I agree with Terry. I have been thinking of this, though I am
still not able to make a sound formulation of the idea. Still I am afraid
that if I miss the chance to make at least a brief formulation of it I will
lose the opportunity to make a brainstorming with you. So, here it comes:
tion of the theories of information based on the
cateogry theory
Hi FISers,
On 10/8/2017, Terry wrote:
" So basically, I am advocating an effort to broaden our discussions and
recognize that the term information applies in diverse ways to many different
contexts. And because of this it is impor
Hi FISers,
On 10/8/2017, Terry wrote:
" So basically, I am advocating an effort to broaden our discussions and
recognize that the term information applies in diverse ways to many different
contexts. And because of this it is important to indicate the framing, whether
physical, formal, biolo
29 matches
Mail list logo
