transmission sites.
For more info I suggest Jane's.
Patrick AF5CK
-Original Message-
From: Jim Barber
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 7:14 PM
Cc: Flex Radio
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Eham review - K1EL VLF Converter and its Use with
FlexRadios
Interesting.
Probably lots of silence and nav
Now if only someone comes out with a transverter (Elecraft would be nice) once
we get the VLF allocation things would get very interesting.
Zack
N8FNR
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
K0od has used both the Palomar and the Heros VLF converter.
I would like to see a side by side comparision of the two converters. Also a
YouTube video of the two in a side by side comparison on a Flex.
--
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 10:45 AM PST vtnn...@comcast.net wrote:
, March 09, 2013 12:45 PM
Subject: [Flexradio] Eham review - K1EL VLF Converter and its Use with
FlexRadios
Found an interesting review by K0OD about using the K1EL systems VLF
converter with a Flex-5000.
http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/5541
K1EL http://www.k1el.com/
73
Zack
N8FNR
...@execulink.com
To: Lee Mushel herbe...@centurytel.net
Cc: vtnn...@comcast.net; Flex Radio flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 4:20:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Eham review - K1EL VLF Converter and its Use with
FlexRadios
Interesting, comments on the K1EL converter and its use
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Eham review - K1EL VLF Converter and its Use with
FlexRadios
Interesting, comments on the K1EL converter and its use with the Flex radios.
A question for those who have listened on the VLF bands. Is there much in the
way of activity there, other than beacons? I know
Found an interesting review by K0OD about using the K1EL systems VLF converter
with a Flex-5000.
http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/5541
K1EL http://www.k1el.com/
73
Zack
N8FNR
___
FlexRadio Systems Mailing List
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
!
73
Lee K9WRUWD2XSH-32
- Original Message -
From: vtnn...@comcast.net
To: Flex Radio flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 12:45 PM
Subject: [Flexradio] Eham review - K1EL VLF Converter and its Use with
FlexRadios
Found an interesting review by K0OD about using
Lee,
Well, you have a point with the VOX problem as that shouldn't require a
minimum delay system to run. I suspect the VOX will soon or has been
solved. I don't use VOX as I can't think or talk fast enough to keep it
pulled in without an inordinate hang time.
PINs: Come to think of it I
Jim Lux wrote (of my dream):
Why not have it spit out on Ethernet?
I thought about this at length. I think it is better and more flexible
for the hypothetical new SDR (even with the added USB/micro in between
us and the current rig) to be a USB 2.0 appliance rather than a network
Ah. Thanks for clearing this up. Mine ALL had the linear regulator,
and we did in fact have to remove those and replace them with the
regulator on the other side of the board to mount to the heat sink. I
was wondering which of us had lost their minds. WHile it wasn't that,
I am clearly
If a decision is made to abandon the serial port protocol I would go for
ethernet so that the radio *can* be put on a network.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
---
www.sysgem.com, www.hb9drv.ch, www.laax.ch
---
- Original Message -
From: Larry Loen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought about this at
That can be done right now if someone wants to take up integrating the
Socket Utilities Library and TCPListener Class that I wrote into the
current PowerSDR source code. I added it to a test version of
PowerSDR 1.3.12 (see blog entry for Tuesday, June 28, 2005 at
Of course I should note that you will still have to have a PC
connected to the SDR-1000 but that can be easily done with a mini-itx
board. Better, yet it would be cool to strip most or all of the GUI
stuff out of PowerSDR except for the setup forms (to make setting
changes to the database - this
Simon Brown wrote:
If a decision is made to abandon the serial port protocol I would go for
ethernet so that the radio *can* be put on a network.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
---
www.sysgem.com, www.hb9drv.ch, www.laax.ch
---
And, under my scheme, nothing whatever would stop you from doing so. It
Lee A Crocker wrote:
When I
read the QST review and I see this kind of report:
Although I could not altogether
eliminate the delay, I was able to
train my brain to work with it.
And then I look at the CW waveform and there are 2 key
closures before the first dit is transmitted, it make
me very
John Sielke:
The CW question is what keeps me from throwing in my money. Is there any
chance we will see QSK, or even true semi-break-in CW with the FLEX? I
fear some may say, why make new technology accomodate an obsolete
mode? If that is the case, and CW will remain an orphan in the
: [Flexradio] Eham Review
At the risk of being antagonistic, I would like to
hear an accurate analysis from users about the
problems with this design. I see a lot of apologetics
and denial regarding the this review:
Eham is stupid
The problem is the antenna
The guy has old boards
yada yada
Let me address a few more concerns:
RFI: Most of us are aware that a radiating
feedline could cause RFI in the shack.
I definitely have a problem here. Alan Davis, N2WS, helped explain why.
Basically, I built a cheapo G5RV without the balun at the feedpoint (based
on bad advise, many field
Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
radio.biz] On Behalf Of W2AGN
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:52 AM
To: Lee A Crocker
Cc: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Eham Review
The CW question is what keeps me
Subject: [Flexradio] Eham Review
http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/4108#42946
Not a nice review - yet is buying another!
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Here's the post that I plan to put on Eham
I’ve had my SDR1000
since the beginning of the year. It is my 3,018 radio-yes I’ve owned over 3000
rigs during 45 plus years of hamming. The only rig I’ve not used is the Yaesu
FT9000.
In the beginning,
pre-Delta 44 sound card, I had to deal
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of VA3MA - Dan
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 11:16 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Eham Review
http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/4108#42946
Not a nice review - yet is buying another
Well, let’s look at the complaints.
“RF suppression is inadequate. The SDR has little to
NO RF shielding. This means if you run an external
amplifier...GOOD LUCK! If you run the internal 100W PA...
you will need some luck as well. This radio was
originally designed as a QRP 1 watt
At 08:34 AM 10/6/2005, Gerald Youngblood wrote:
Hi Tim,
I am afraid I must chime in on this topic because of some misperceptions
that may arise from the exam review.
One thing that has been different about this radio is that the
purchaser of serial number uno over two years ago has had the
t the risk of over beating a dead horse, I've got get this off my chest. I'm
sorry Chris had some issues, hopefully they will be resolved through the proper
channels. It certainly looks like Gerald is trying on his end.
But you know..what amazes me about Eham Reviews, is the disparity
At 12:08 PM 10/6/2005, Robert McGwier wrote:
ALL of my three SDR-1000's are Mark I radios and they all have all of the
ECO's.
Bob
N4HY
I have not observed this. Note: by applying the Engineering
Change Orders and updating the software, you have the latest
version of the transceiver.
: [Flexradio] Eham Review
t the risk of over beating a dead horse, I've got get this off my chest. I'm
sorry Chris had some issues, hopefully they will be resolved through the
proper channels. It certainly looks like Gerald is trying on his end.
But you know..what amazes me about Eham Reviews
At 01:31 PM 10/6/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 07:40 AM 10/6/2005, Dale Boresz wrote:
I have often advocated that, someday, we minimize/get rid of this
altogether with some sort of true USB interface to a small microprocessor,
possibly sending in the I and Q stream as integers or IEEE
At 06:26 PM 10/6/2005, ecellison wrote:
Bill
This was the last message on the topic that I read. Kill the horse,
since
you hit on the MOST important of all facts which make this radio
different
than others, in your last paragraph. The many comments about the
'review'
hit on many aspects which
http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/4108#42946
Not a nice review - yet is buying another!
31 matches
Mail list logo
