Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:58:16 +0100, Mat wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mamaloucos.com>:
I just rang Europress publishers of the Getmapping "high in the sky"
series (reminded by Boris's question). I spoke to Richard
Charge their head of Sales. To be very clear this is dif
Boris Koenig wrote:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:58:16 +0100, Mat wrote in message
I have been asking Getmapping if it is permissible use for people to
buy their CDs and then use the exported image in FG in a personal
flight sim.
..wrong question; IMHO you should have said "_GPL_ fl
Sorry for all those typos in that other posting...
I'm simply not yet entirely awake :-)
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
If we are to do something similar, it will probably be a better idea to find
several open source ATC-simulator development groups
Well, I am not aware of *any* popular ATC simulator
If you combine calc-tile.pl and find-elevation.pl the end result is
something rather useful. Feed a list like this:
# Ferrybridge C
SE47522459:0:ferrybridgechimney.ac
SE47622464:0:ferrybridgechimney.ac
SE47752467:0:coolingtower.ac
SE47792478:0:coolingtower.ac
SE47672481:0:coolingtower.ac
SE477224
Boris Koenig wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Generating a dynamic menu structure might be harder than you think,
As you didn't yet reply to the ideas that I mentioned in this thread,
I simply tried the approach that I described.
And everything seems to work somewhat now - with the small exception
that I
Boris Koenig wrote:
Boris Koenig wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
Generating a dynamic menu structure might be harder than you think,
As you didn't yet reply to the ideas that I mentioned in this thread,
I simply tried the approach that I described.
Good, I am not always able to respond quickly.
I have
Erik Hofman writes:
>
> Boris Koenig wrote:
>
> > Also, I as an additional feature I was thinking of adding
> > the funcitonality to "auto-hide" the menu after a pre-defined
> > amount of time, so that it disappears automatically if the
> > mouse is not in that area, and appears again when I move
Erik Hofman wrote:
Boris Koenig wrote:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:58:16 +0100, Mat wrote in message
I have been asking Getmapping if it is permissible use for people to
buy their CDs and then use the exported image in FG in a personal
flight sim.
..wrong question; IMHO you should
Hello,
Jon Stockill wrote:
If you combine calc-tile.pl and find-elevation.pl the end result is
something rather useful. Feed a list like this:
(1) I'm just making a few perl modules and I would like to use
the coding in "calc-tile.pl". Is this ok???
(2) Is it possible to store the elevation for o
Horst J. Wobig wrote:
Hello,
Jon Stockill wrote:
If you combine calc-tile.pl and find-elevation.pl the end result is
something rather useful. Feed a list like this:
(1) I'm just making a few perl modules and I would like to use
the coding in "calc-tile.pl". Is this ok???
That's not my code - it c
Boris Koenig wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
This is really great from the publishers and should be taken for granted!
...not... ?
Eh, yes.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Boris Koenig wrote:
Anyway, I am going to give this also a shot and contact some companies
that provide aerial/satellite image data, could anybody here provide the
details concerning the requirements that need to be met for an image
to be suitable to be used as a texture for FlightGear ?
One meter
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:52:06 +0200, Boris wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> browse sf.net and find efforts like:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/atcj/
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/airtraffic/
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jatcsimdata/
> http://sourcefor
On 9/23/04 at 7:13 PM Erik Hofman wrote:
>Boris Koenig wrote:
>
>> Anyway, I am going to give this also a shot and contact some companies
>> that provide aerial/satellite image data, could anybody here provide the
>> details concerning the requirements that need to be met for an image
>> to be s
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:52:06 +0200, Boris wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
browse sf.net and find efforts like:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/atcj/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/airtraffic/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jatcsimdata/
Hello Jon,
Jon Stockill wrote:
Horst J. Wobig wrote:
(2) Is it possible to store the elevation for objects in stg files
*relative* to ground level at a given longitude/latitude?
I looked at tileentry.cxx, but I'm not familiar enough with
the FG sources/internals to say how this could be done.
The
Erik Hofman wrote:
Boris Koenig wrote:
Anyway, I am going to give this also a shot and contact some companies
that provide aerial/satellite image data, could anybody here provide the
details concerning the requirements that need to be met for an image
to be suitable to be used as a texture for Flig
Boris Koenig wrote:
> The mentioned sourceforge projects are certainly not "popular",
> if I remember correctly, only one of these does actually interface
> with the existing ivao/vatsim infrastructure, [...]
BTW, do you know enough about these two networks to provide a short
summary. I know the
Martin Spott wrote:
Boris Koenig wrote:
The mentioned sourceforge projects are certainly not "popular",
if I remember correctly, only one of these does actually interface
with the existing ivao/vatsim infrastructure, [...]
BTW, do you know enough about these two networks to provide a short
summa
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:56:50 +0200, Boris wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And there are many more hits regarding the IVAO vs. VATSIM debate.
>
> Personally, I consider this ridiculous: combining their efforts and
> creating ONE BIG network would benefit EVERYBODY - everything would
> be
Beware being like Sony. Invent a new protocol that is better and more
efficient and flexible, and still nobody will use it, though, on the
other hand, nobody uses Sony's protocols (ATRAC-3, Betamax), because
they are eyeballed with patents.
Giles Robertson
-Original Message-
From: Arnt Ka
John writes:
> >Thinking a bit about the folks playing in the virtual ATC world. Would be
> >nice if FG could be included, might obviate the need for an AI system.
> >Conversely, developing an AI/ATC system is good exercise for the brain
> >muscle and provides a nice alternative for network-challen
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:56:50 +0200, Boris wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
And there are many more hits regarding the IVAO vs. VATSIM debate.
Personally, I consider this ridiculous: combining their efforts and
creating ONE BIG network would benefit EVERYBODY - everything
May be you weren't guiding enough aircrafts. ;-)
Ampere
On September 23, 2004 03:56 pm, Boris Koenig wrote:
> once I even started it myself in
> order to see "where's the fun stuff" - but actually it seemed quite
> boring, so maybe that was simply a bad day or I'm simply too easily
> bored ;-)
_
Giles Robertson wrote:
Beware being like Sony. Invent a new protocol that is better and more
efficient and flexible, and still nobody will use it, though, on the
other hand, nobody uses Sony's protocols (ATRAC-3, Betamax), because
they are eyeballed with patents.
and despite from that: this would
But there's also some good news in this whole discussion: this morning I
had an eMail in my inbox from "Richard Smith" who told me he would have
written a linux based version of IVAO's ProController some time ago
because he didn't want to run Windows just for playing with IVAO - he
called it 'xATC'
John Wojnaroski wrote:
John writes:
Thinking a bit about the folks playing in the virtual ATC world. Would be
nice if FG could be included, might obviate the need for an AI system.
Conversely, developing an AI/ATC system is good exercise for the brain
muscle and provides a nice alternative for netw
This is what Richard's README file says:
8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-8>-
This is the first release of XAtc.
It has been developed under NetBSD 1.5 / 1.6
It has been tested on a remote Linux system, and it
compiled/worked (very
Richard just informed me that I posted the wrong link ...
I downloaded the oldest version that I could find :-)
The new one seems even to be configured using XML files.
So, this one should be the latest:
http://www.theforest.plus.com/software/xatc-1.3b.tar.gz
Also, like I just told Richard - I've p
29 matches
Mail list logo
