Martin Spott schreef:
Well, we've been driving two 'external' displays on last years LinuxTag
exhibition using the 'generic' protocol. We were surprised to encounter
a significant performance hit on the master machine serving two clients
at 20 Hz. Throttling the thing down to 10 Hz made the
Curtis Olson wrote:
3. I'll just toss in this unrelated item ... a week ago I got to fly
on a NWA A330. This aircraft had individual movie/music/game/map
displays for each seat. I managed to hang/lock mine up ... apparently
because the map wasn't working on this flight for some reason.
Ralf Gerlich wrote:
I don't know whether this should be termed a good thing. Or why should
Linux-advocates be proud of their operating system being seen rebooting
on two independent instances? ;-)
Cheers,
Ralf
They would be more concerned about what was happening BEFORE the reboot.
The
Bill Galbraith wrote:
Okay, that looks really good.
Now, let's make it more challenging. Let's see circles to get me back to the
squares in a reasonable amount of time ;-}
Bill
Does the line geometry run through OSG? Might be a very good starting
point of converting the HUD to an
On ven 12 octobre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
On 12/10/2007, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can have your aircraft any way you want, but don't force it on other
designers without some real thought. Start the Spitfire and forget to
zero the throttle, you will start on your nose.
On sam 13 octobre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Tim Moore -- Saturday 13 October 2007:
If I had received only objections, I wouldn't have checked it in.
I and AJ objected. Andy suggested an alternative (trying .osg and
.ac on objects with no explicit extension), which I don't exactly
On sam 13 octobre 2007, Forums Virgin Net wrote:
Hi,
OK I know people are getting impatient so here is a semi final version
the last 4 minutes or so has to be finalised yet.
http://stage6.divx.com/user/Ortorea/video/1736096/OLegs-Adventure-3-Teaser-
--This-is-a-Semi-Final-Release
For
Hello,
I had in my hangar that old (very old) model Piasecki H-21c which had not
any valuable FDM.
That troups transport was the ancestor of the ch47.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piasecki_H-21
I have not any specifications data ( but the rotor diameter and engine power).
After a quick and
Hello,
I am getting trouble with typeblend/type when i use it in a (SUB)model
which is part of a (MAIN)model.
For instance i have a (MAIN)model (Helicopter) which does not include the
Rotor. That rotor is defined in a separate model with animations.
With FG PLIB that typeblend/type animation
Hello,
In order to please to the old time helicopter lover
Sikorsky S-51 Dragonfly and the Piasecki flying banana H-21C Shawnee,
are now available on CVS.
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/S-51-Dragonfly.jpg
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/S-51-img1.jpg
AND
On dim 4 novembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
SydSandy schrieb:
Thank for the encouraging reviews ...
According to the documentation I read , it is very sensitive to control
inputs ... but Im afraid I haven't found airfoil numbers , so I'm relying
on Maik (again) to fix it :) (Sorry Maik
On mer 7 novembre 2007, Thomas wrote:
On 11/5/07, SydSandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Haven't figured out how to stop the ground sliding yet ... but the FDM
comes first
It's almost definitely a YASim problem and is especially troublesome for
helicopters. I did a fair amount of tweaking of
On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
I just moved tailwheel-lock from lowercase 'l' to uppercase 'L', and
reassigned lowercase 'l' to toggle lighting (for easy night starts
without searching for switches). I assigned lighting to the lowercase
'l' because I think it would be much
On sam 10 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
L is used to engage in the aircraft carrier's catapult
(see $FG_ROOT/Input/Keyboard/carrier-bindings.xml). So
around 10 aircraft will overwrite the new lighting binding
anyway.
err ... the
On sam 10 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* alexis bory -- Saturday 10 November 2007:
Vivian Meazza a écrit :
Sounds reasonable to me.
I Agree too.
Umm ... it's only that I had forgotten that Ctrl-c is
toggle clickable panel hotspots. So the plan doesn't
work out exactly like
On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv32383
Modified Files:
keyboard.xml
Log Message:
Reassign tail-wheel locking from 'l' to 'L' (previously unused), and
use 'l' to toggle lighting.
Index:
On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
On 10/11/2007, gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can notice the update has been done , before we could give any opinion
on the topic.
Does it mean , that there is not any other alternative, and the CHOICE is
that way nothing else
On sam 10 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
gerard robin
Sent: 10 November 2007 18:37
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS:
data keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
wonder if it would not have been better to find a global
On dim 11 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
gerard robin
Sent: 11 November 2007 13:18
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS:
data keyboard.xml,1.99, 1.100
On sam 10 novembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
gerard robin
Hello
An other model of an ancestor helicopter, the HUP Retriever ,which was
developed by Piasecki, is available on CVS.
It was a rescue helicopter, with To provide rescue without crew assistance, a
door (under the copilot seat) , available after folding the copilot’s seat
forward, opened
On lun 12 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the suggestions so far. Just to get back on
track, we have to start by seeing if we can come up with a short,
priority list of stuff that's (a) applicable to most aircraft, and (b)
important enough to have a key
On lun 12 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
On 12/11/2007, gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to say first which mains features will not have an
official KEY dedicated ?
I think it's shorter to decide which ones *will* have an official key
dedicated -- that's
On lun 12 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
On 12/11/2007, gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean wait and see ?
No, just that it makes sense to decide *what* functions need
keybindings before we decide *where* to bind them.
Oh, right ,
probably i misunderstood the rule
On lun 12 novembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
Hi gérard,
Great helicopter. Nice addon to flightgear.
By the way: Watching the HUP I got aware, that there is a problem with
the animation of the flapping angle of the blades. The problem is the
missing documentation of the output of the the rotor
On mar 13 novembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
Hello Gerard,
it's generic. I need to check, which helicopters are doing it correct
and which helicopters are doing it as one would expect (0 deg =
forward) and which helicopters do not depend on this flapping angle (you
can use cone-deg, roll-deg
On mar 13 novembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
Hi Maik,
now as we have several tandem-rotor helicopters I would like to ask
wheather the yaw-axis treatment of the helo flightmodel is satisfying or
has to be polished up a little. Or if this is just up to the creator of
such a helo how to
On mar 13 novembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
Hi Gérard,
although your H 21 flies very nice (and has an exellent 3D-model,
eye-candy!) I have the same yaw-problem - reaction is very slow and
damped. This makes procedures nearly impossible like going down to
your selected
On mar 13 novembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
On lun 12 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
I haven't thought much about the whole matter, but here are
some of my thoughts anyway. :-)
(1) A complete reorganization shouldn't be done before the
0.9.11 release, but I don't assume
On mar 13 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
On 12/11/2007, gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
probably i misunderstood the rule, didn't you modify cvs before getting
decision about *what* functions need keybindings.
I promised to put it back if there were objections -- there were
Hello,
If you wants a tool which help to make any OSG object, here the very last
version of OSGEdit which is usable
http://osgedit.sourceforge.net/.
It looks to be better than the previous version, with a lot of improvements.
Regards
BTW: you could notice on that page the name of
On jeu 22 novembre 2007, SydSandy wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:47:29 +0100
AnMaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
AndersG He might have remapped PgUp/Down to..
AndersG Yep.. that is what's up..
AndersG Hmm.. that means (AFAIKS) there is no
On ven 23 novembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
On ven 23 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
SNIP
But why then does some code still not use var, even code written
by Andy? Because the keyword didn't exist from the beginning. It was
added after I had run into weird error messages when
On ven 23 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Most people seem to think that var in Nasal is a kind of
redundant decoration, and really just noise. It isn't.
In fact, I consider Nasal code *not* using it broken.
var makes a variable guaranteed to be local. And note that
functions assigned
On ven 23 novembre 2007, Jon Stockill wrote:
Durk Talsma wrote:
This is a quick note to everybody: I'm planning to build an official
FlightGear pre-release tonight. I did a full dress rehearsal last sunday
and that all seemed to work well, but I still needed Curt's okay for a
few
On sam 24 novembre 2007, SydSandy wrote:
Hello all,
While I'm in the process of updating nasal and other files , is there a
naming style we should stick to in the set files for cold and idle startup
modes ? I have a b1900d-set and a b1900d-quickstart-set , which is too long
, IMHO. Im
On mar 27 novembre 2007, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Hi,
I think we should merge the latest JSBSim code into fg before releasing
0.9.11. There are many fixes since the last merge and I'd love to have them
in fg, too.
Torsten
Me, Too, I'd love to have them:)
--
Gérard
On mer 28 novembre 2007, Markus Zojer wrote:
Hi all!
Major B-1B update, please apply the whole folder since almost all files
are updated.
B-1B file is located in subfolder;
http://homepage.univie.ac.at/markus.zojer/fgfs/B-1B0011.tar.gz
Thanks,
markus
Hello, Markus
With only few free
On mer 28 novembre 2007, Markus Zojer wrote:
SydSandy wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:07:13 +0100
gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On mer 28 novembre 2007, Markus Zojer wrote:
Hi all!
Thanks gerard! Check out also the breaking smoke(120 kts) and flares
(ctrl d)!
Oh yes
On jeu 29 novembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
LeeE wrote:
Re the secondary flight controls, we need to allow for separate ground
steering and rudder control, in addition to differential braking - with
tandem and quadracycle landing gear you need to steer independently in
cross-winds -
.
It might take some time. I'm learning as I go.
Best Regards,
Paul B
gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On mer 21 novembre 2007, Mike Schuh wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
1) I think splitting the dialog into two - one for AI/ATC and one for
carrier settings would
On jeu 29 novembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Georg Vollnhals -- Thursday 29 November 2007:
Could you imagine to put this nasal file into the Nasal folder of the
upcoming release *deactivated*, ie. named gstunnel.nas.off or
something like that?
Better fix the problems that can be fixed
Hello,
Looking at the nice new helicopter Alouette-II, lead me to remember that i had
in my hangar (among a lot of others models :) )
that Alouette-III, which was made to be a Pedro for the carrier Foch the
model is high poly (missing some externals details).
On ven 30 novembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
why do you ask?
We need helicopters! :-)
And the Alouette III is very common and wrote a big
part of the history of helicopters!
Regards
HHS
Oh, right, i have others which could come,
the Puma AS330
On ven 30 novembre 2007, Thomas Förster wrote:
Am Freitag 30 November 2007 schrieb Curtis Olson:
...[lots of version number discussion]...
I say it's go time. :-)
If it comes down to marketing and a reasonable version number scheme (i.e.
one that correlates with the major feature
Hi,
why do you ask?
We need helicopters! :-)
And the Alouette III is very common and wrote a big
part of the history of helicopters!
Regards
HHS
Hi Gérard,
these helicopters are not only of interest for the French:
Alouette III (=ask Melchior, the Austrian Army use(d) it), Puma
On lun 3 décembre 2007, Melchior Franz wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/SimGear/simgear/scene/model
In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv27750
Modified Files:
Tag: PRE_OSG_PLIB_20061029
shadowvolume.cxx
Log Message:
let use of deprecated noshadow prefix cause error message
On lun 3 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
For those who want to avoid the message already now, here's a list
of models still using the noshadow prefix. Note that some objects
use a noshadow *postfix*. This doesn't cause error messages, but
it will also not discard shadows. Never has.
On lun 3 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Monday 03 December 2007:
On lun 3 décembre 2007, Melchior Franz wrote:
Log Message:
let use of deprecated noshadow prefix cause error message
Will that message remain permanently, ?
Only in the next (plib based) release
On lun 3 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Monday 03 December 2007:
Yes SG_WARN, would be the best, that message isn't it for
FG developer , who could want a help, to keep their models compatible ?
Err ... but if I see that right, there's only one file concerned
On jeu 2 août 2007, Ron Jensen wrote:
Been working on the stork, so I updated my safety copy.
- Added a rattling chain sound to the flap movement.
- Started detailing nose area
There's some quicky screen caps here, too:
http://www.jentronics.com/fgfs/storch-001.jpg
Hello,
To follow the previous topic about some helicopters which are in my private
hangar , Alouette III, Lynx, and Puma,
Alouette III is now available on cvs,
That model will need:
a good FDM, the Maik know how will be very useful :)
a cockpit witht instruments and animations , i
On mar 4 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Durk Talsma -- Tuesday 04 December 2007:
data/Aircraft/737-300 \
Yes, I'd swap that with the 787. A flat panel that disappears
when you look left/right is hard to bear. (Though I miss a VOR
display on the 787. Need to search
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
I believe recent enhancements and fixes in JSBSim may have
fixed the F-16, but I'm not sure.
Well, not in FlightGear's CVS, though it may have improved
a bit. BTW: I reported that problem a least
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
I wonder if it is a platform-specific issue?
Extremely unlikely.
But this could play a role: my js has the centering spring
deactivated. So, when I have the f16 parked, this is often
with elevator
On mar 4 décembre 2007, Ron Jensen wrote:
I haven't made much time lately for this project... If someone with
write access would like to put this aircraft into CVS, they have my
permission. I'm been meaning to have it put in...
Ron Jensen
Because i love it (and i have cvs access), I
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Ron Jensen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 14:50 +0100, gerard robin wrote:
On mar 4 décembre 2007, Ron Jensen wrote:
I haven't made much time lately for this project... If someone with
write access would like to put this aircraft into CVS, they have my
permission
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
Don't we have to take care, and to keep a balance like it was before ?
You mean, we have to ship FlightGear v1.0 with as many broken aircraft
as working ones, for balancing reasons? :-}
m.
Broken
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Berndt, Jon S wrote:
There has been some discussion of the F-16 working badly. I took another
look at it over lunch. I think I have found one bug (which is not to
say, the only bug). There are several integrators used in the control
laws. These should have wind-up
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
You mean, we have to ship FlightGear v1.0 with as many broken aircraft
as working ones, for balancing reasons? :-}
Broken ???
I don't understand
this aircraft belongs to (let's say:
small high-powered jet powered and highy manouvreable) is a bit
overrepresented (with the A10, [f16/lightning], and [Hunter/SeaHawk] being
present.
Gerard Robin suggested adding the concorde, and there are some aspects of
this proposal I like, asit
On jeu 6 décembre 2007, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
--- gerard robin wrote:
Nobody (but me) has talked about the Concorde which is highly
elaborated why ?
Probably because few people on the -dev list take the time to fully get to
grips with it.
As you say - it is a very complicated aircraft
On jeu 6 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi
A screenshot here:
http://www.hoerbird.net/boeing737-300.3dcockpit1.jpg
I have still trouble with perfomance, but I have a
too old pc anyway ...
That's why the developement is very slow and now cause
of looking for a new job I will not
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Hans Fugal wrote:
The aircraft discussion has been interesting. One stumbling block I've
come across when deciding which aircraft to download before is the
quality guessing game. The web site lists the author's assessment, but
I've found that to be less useful than it
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
--- Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Friday 07 December 2007:
- avoiding really difficult to fly aircraft in the default aircraft
collection doesn't make fgfs a toy, and
Oh, and to take some pressure from the bf109, I declare
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Yes we must not talk about artistic competences
(here the msfs models are
better :( ), only to answer the question: does the
model simulate the real
one ?which degree of simulation ?
Right I think- eye candies are only one small part
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Jon Stockill wrote:
I've got a Chipmunk T-10 planned when the grob g115 is more complete -
was the standard RAF trainer a long time ago, and is still in service
for pilots training to fly with the BBMF - would that be suitable?
Jon
that one ?
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
Goorg, and Melchir,
Thanks for your report and opinion.
On Dec 8, 2007, at 1:09 AM, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
Hi Tat,
tested this on OpenSUSE 10.2 86_64 with FG 9.11 Prerelease
S76 Helicopter
1. DList stack overflow
(snip)
NEGATIVE
On ven 7 décembre 2007, AJ MacLeod wrote:
On Friday 07 December 2007 14:40:34 gerard robin wrote:
Making the 3D model shape is the easiest (5% of the work, more or less
24 hours of work, but very complicated shape)
There is a lot of stuff to do:
=the cockpit must completed (versus the A10
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Gerard robin wrote
Sent: 07 December 2007 15:44
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Aircraft Downloading and Quality
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Yes we must not talk about artistic
On sam 8 décembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
AnMaster
Sent: 08 December 2007 11:55
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] multiplayer generic properties
SNIP
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
After Maik has clued me up about multiplayer properties --
that
On sam 8 décembre 2007, Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi there,
Based on all the input sofar, I'd like to propose the following list of
aircraft for inclusion in the next release:
787
A-10
bf109
bo105
c172
c172p
SenecaII
Beaver
B1900d
Lightning
j3cub
seahawk
p51d
pa28-161
Bocian
choice
On ven 7 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Friday 07 December 2007:
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/StampeSV4.jpg
Wow, that's a nice one!
Unfortunately it will not be available before FG stable will
be released :(
We can postpone the release for it. ;-)
m
On sam 8 décembre 2007, Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi there,
Based on all the input sofar, I'd like to propose the following list of
aircraft for inclusion in the next release:
787
A-10
bf109
bo105
c172
c172p
SenecaII
Beaver
B1900d
Lightning
j3cub
seahawk
p51d
pa28-161
Bocian
choice
On sam 8 décembre 2007, Ralf Gerlich wrote:
Hi Gerard!
gerard robin wrote:
Thanks , but NO
Catalina and Blackbird are on only under construction.
There is a lot of stuff to do , cockpit and FDM (mainly Blackbird which
is wrong),
My to do list is long like the bible :)
Nothing
On dim 9 décembre 2007, Tim Moore wrote:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Sunday 09 December 2007:
glut in fg/plib or fg/osg?
Disregard. I see from the diff that it's fg/osg. In that
case the patch shouldn't be applied. Tim, can you check if
your last change to the glut
On sam 8 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Durk Talsma -- Saturday 08 December 2007:
Based on all the input sofar, I'd like to propose the following list of
aircraft for inclusion in the next release:
Looks good. Not trying to say anything particular -- just FYI:
20M 787
20M
On mar 11 décembre 2007, SydSandy wrote:
I think I finally found out why the b1900d is still running at startup...
The condition lever is set to 1 in the TurbineEngine.cpp file , so it
appears to override anything in the set file. Ive forced it to 0 in the
system.nas file during fdm
On mar 11 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
On mar 11 décembre 2007, SydSandy wrote:
I think I finally found out why the b1900d is still running at startup...
The condition lever is set to 1 in the TurbineEngine.cpp file , so it
appears to override anything in the set file. Ive forced
On mar 11 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Durk Talsma -- Tuesday 11 December 2007:
As it looks right now, either tonight, or Thursday evening will
be my two windows of opportunity this week.
I would rather go for Thursday, then. It's only known for a short
time which aircraft are
On mar 11 décembre 2007, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Quoting gerard robin :
I am coming back on something which could be a bug (may be i am wrong).
As said previously, with YASim, i try to give an init value within the
Aircraft-set.xml file
controls
engines
On mar 11 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Tuesday 11 December 2007:
[...] with YASim, i try to give an init value within the
Aircraft-set.xml file
controls
engines
engine n=0
magnetos0/magnetos
On mar 11 décembre 2007, dave perry wrote:
gerard robin wrote:
SNIP
The bleriot is very nice, much nicer than the wright. But its FDM
is a bit ... ummm ... well, the engine is quite powerful and the
aircraft allows some aerobatics, which the real one probably didn't ;-)
m.
About
Hello,
About helicopter, i told that i will deliver one of my old models Lynx-WG13,
however i had not any snapshot to show you, after some cleaning and update,
here the rough result.
I will commit it by the end of that week.
Later on, It will want:
=A good FDM ( fortunately Maik is there
On mar 11 décembre 2007, LeeE wrote:
I couldn't resist having a quick look at it:)
I've attached a config for you to have a look at (tarred gzip'd)
I took your revised config and changed:
approach aoa - now set to 3 deg - 15 deg value seemed much too high
and just wouldn't have worked
On mer 12 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Durk Talsma -- Saturday 08 December 2007:
Based on all the input sofar, I'd like to propose the following
list of aircraft for inclusion in the next release:
BTW: one of these lacks a texture file. I just don't want to
diktate that it be
On mer 12 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 12 December 2007:
And, what, about the Bleriot FDM done by David and Lee ?
Oh, I don't want to diktate about this either. But I think with
the current FDM it would put us into a glasshouse, from which
throwing stones
On mer 12 décembre 2007, Stewart Andreason wrote:
gerard robin wrote:
or,
I can wonder, How does that aircraft look and fly?, and then get a
segfault with gdb backtrace...
Conditions to reproduce: turn on Aircraft shadow, bump clouds, and 3d
clouds, before starting this aircraft
On ven 14 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
On ven 14 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
For a new release, especially one with version number 1.0, we
should provide some new screenshots for the website. Normally,
Curt would ask for that, but as he is/was away for a few days,
I start
On ven 14 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
For a new release, especially one with version number 1.0, we
should provide some new screenshots for the website. Normally,
Curt would ask for that, but as he is/was away for a few days,
I start with this reminder. Screenshots should ...
SNIP
On ven 14 décembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
gerard robin
Sent: 14 December 2007 15:31
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] screenshots (and snapshots)
On ven 14 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
For a new release, especially one with version
On sam 15 décembre 2007, AJ MacLeod wrote:
This could give an idea for an other snapshot.
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Noratlas-Para.jpg
That one has a wrong definition ( missing aliasing )
Regards
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
On sam 15 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
..and a pity that the parachutes are nor really
round...
but this are the shots are needed!
Regards
HHS
--- AJ MacLeod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
schrieb:
On Saturday 15 December 2007 14:34:19 gerard robin
wrote:
This could give an idea
On sam 15 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
On sam 15 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
..and a pity that the parachutes are nor really
round...
but this are the shots are needed!
Regards
HHS
--- AJ MacLeod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
schrieb:
On Saturday 15 December 2007 14:34:19
On sam 15 décembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
Very nice!
Have you commited the nicer parachutes to cvs? I would like to try some
screenshots with them too. :) Also where is that screenshot taken? What is
the local airport?
Regards,
Arvid Norlander
Hello Arvid,
Sorry, for the delayed answer.
On dim 16 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
Here a lot of photos about Blackbird-A with aar and Blackbird-B
with chute.
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Blackbird-aar_1.jpg
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Blackbird-aar_2.jpg
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Blackbird-aar_3.jpg
I guess
to test again ,it's
probably my fault.
Just wondering if anyone else is having this problem
.
Cheers
--
SydSandy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only in the moment with SR 71 by Gerad Robin :-(
I don't know why...
Regards
HHS
Here, with FG 1.0 both, Bravo and Blackbird are right,
I get
On dim 16 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Here, with FG 1.0 both, Bravo and Blackbird are
right,
I get mainly problems with OSG.
Regards
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
FGFS 12/13/2007 windows precompiled
May be something different with Windows.
I run FG
On dim 16 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
On dim 16 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
Here a lot of photos about Blackbird-A with aar and Blackbird-B
with chute.
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Blackbird-aar_1.jpg
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Blackbird-aar_2.jpg
http
On lun 17 décembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
gerard robin schrieb:
On lun 17 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Rescue_1.jpg
Is the winch a trick? Never noticed...
Great pic - it has my vote!
Regards
HHS
No it is not a trick, only
On lun 17 décembre 2007, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi Gérard,
do I understand this right that you managed (with
some Nasal code?) that
one can catch an object (ie the poor pilot) with
the winch tow and get
it (him) out of the water to the carrier?
This would be spectacular - or just a
1 - 100 of 630 matches
Mail list logo
