Hi,
I checked out xml-fop from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic (actually
using Eclipse), and tried to build the version.
The following error messages are displayed:
hyphenation:
[serHyph] Processing .\hyph\cs.xml
[serHyph] Can't load
On 26.11.2002 11:14:21 Thilo Schwidurski wrote:
Hi,
I checked out xml-fop from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic (actually
using Eclipse), and tried to build the version.
The following error messages are displayed:
hyphenation:
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 23:52, Victor Mote wrote:
Keiron Liddle wrote (on about 11-19, in a different thread):
Currently the document updating process is manual (but a lot easier than
before).
Now that current cvs fop can handle the documents a lot better I will do
an update once the
- Original Message -
From: Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Current CVS version won't build
[build problems...]
I've just checked and I can build on the command line.
I see, I can build on the command line
Thilo,
would you like to help me find out what the problem is? If yes, could
you change your local
org.apache.fop.tools.anttasks.SerializeHyphPattern.java so it displays
the absolute path instead of the relative one? That way we can find out
what's different in the Eclipse environment.
Here's a
- Original Message -
From: Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: Current CVS version won't build
Thilo,
would you like to help me find out what the problem is?
Sure (right after lunch;-).
If yes, could you
- Original Message -
From: Thilo Schwidurski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: Current CVS version won't build
- Original Message -
From: Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
(Warning: this mail starts slowly and is getting mean at the end...)
Oleg and I wonder what we should do with the fact that the FOP servlet
exists in docs/examples/embedding and contrib/servlet. Joerg seems to
have some ideas about this, so I hope he tells us when he's back from
holidays. But the
On 26.11.2002 13:19:54 Thilo Schwidurski wrote:
The pathes look like this: c:\[...]\xml-fop\.\hyph\cs.xml
It would think it is the PatternParser that has a problem with the \.\
(perhaps only under Windows?)
Well, that looks ok to me. The . should not be a problem IMO. Have you
been able to
Responses below.
-Original Message-
From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alt-Design status: XML handling
This is not a problem for at least the maintenance version of the code.
All of the processing
- Original Message -
From: Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: Current CVS version won't build
On 26.11.2002 13:19:54 Thilo Schwidurski wrote:
The pathes look like this: c:\[...]\xml-fop\.\hyph\cs.xml
It
Art Welch, out PCL expert, is not around so I'll try to help you as good
as I can. Disclaimer: I'm no PCL expert. I've had a look at the
programmer's manual for my Brother HL-1250 which is a PCL printer. It
doesn't support ZapfDingbats. Looking at PCLRenderer.java there's code
that should trigger
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8391.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9113.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thilo, Jeremias,
After reading Thilo's first message my understanding is that the reason for
getting unexpected output in the resulting PDF is that he checked out the
Trunk, and not the maintenance branch.
Thilo, if you want to get 0.20.5cvs, then you need to check out using the
branch label
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9379.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10846.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Actually, the hyphenation stuff is the same for the maintenance branch
and the trunk and does not generate any error messages during build in
either codebase when done on the command line. It might of course be
that Thilo is on the wrong branch but he will experience this particular
problem
Jeremias,
it could well be that there is a problem with hypenation. The messages I get
seem to relate to just 2/3 files out of 22.
It was just that you seemed to be putting a lot of effort into solving this,
when I thought Thilo's original question was just about getting and building
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11839.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: Current CVS version won't build
Thilo, Jeremias,
After reading Thilo's first message my understanding is that the reason
for
getting unexpected
On 26.11.2002 16:01:57 Chris Bowditch wrote:
it could well be that there is a problem with hypenation. The messages I get
seem to relate to just 2/3 files out of 22.
As far as I can tell hyphenation works file with the maintenance branch
in CVS. docs/examples/fo/hyphen.fo looks good.
It was
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12164.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12610.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14013.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6638.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: Current CVS version won't build
On 26.11.2002 16:01:57 Chris Bowditch wrote:
it could well be that there is a problem with hypenation. The
Apologies...
I saw the original message, but have not had time to look into it.
Just to back Jeremias up, I believe that his answer is correct.
First thing to do is to print the font list for your printer. This should
(at least most PCL printers do) give the control codes to invoke the font.
If
chrisg 2002/11/26 10:15:19
Modified:.Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain CHANGES
src/org/apache/fop/render/pcl Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain
PCLRenderer.java
Log:
Added autoselecting portrait/landscape on PCL Renderer (see bug #6638)
Submitted by:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6638.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
is any one implementing keep properties? If so i need
some information about keep properties.
Thanks
sri
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
-Original Message-
From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: November 26, 2002 3:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alt-Design status: XML handling
Rhett,
To comment on only two aspects of your posting.
Rhett Aultman wrote:
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks a lot Art and Jeremias, I will look at the fonts installed at the
printer.I am trying to send the FOP generated PCL through Infoprint server
at the mainframe for distributed printing to remote printers ( HP laserjet 4
and 5). As suggested by Art, I am opting for the [x] option time being. .
pbwest 2002/11/26 18:43:59
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/properties Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
ActiveState.java AlignmentAdjust.java
AlignmentBaseline.java BorderCommonStyle.java
BreakCommon.java CaptionSide.java
pbwest 2002/11/26 18:52:08
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/properties Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
BorderColor.java
Log:
Now extends ColorTransparent.
Extracted processList() from refineParsing().
Fixed getColor() to try enumerated color before logging
pbwest 2002/11/26 18:54:12
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/properties Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
Property.java
Log:
Added Numeric hadling to processEdgeList().
Changed MessageHandler.log to MessageHandler.logln.
Revision ChangesPath
No
pbwest 2002/11/26 19:02:01
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/flow Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
FoTableBody.java
Log:
Generalised getEndElement() calls.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
pbwest 2002/11/26 19:04:02
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/apps Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design Fop.java
Log:
Added some instrumentation.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.6.2.2 +32 -1
Responses below.
-Original Message-
From: Arved Sandstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 11/26/2002 6:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: Alt-Design status: XML handling
Actually, it really
pbwest 2002/11/26 19:24:36
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/xml Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
FoXMLEvent.java
Log:
Added clearFo(). Modified clear().
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.1.2.3
pbwest 2002/11/26 19:25:18
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/xml Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
XMLEvent.java
Log:
Modified clear() to return the event.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
pbwest 2002/11/26 19:27:11
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/xml Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
XMLEventPool.java
Log:
Changed pool from a LinkedList to an ArrayList.
Changed surrenderXMLEvent() to surrenderEvent().
Revision ChangesPath
No
pbwest 2002/11/26 19:31:16
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/xml Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
FoXMLEventPool.java
Log:
Changed acquireFoXMLEvent() to extend XMLEventPool.acquireEvent() and clear the
FoType field.
Added two-arg constructor with initialSize arg.
Guys,
I finally got myself out from under my grad school apps long enough to employ a patch
that helps nerf certain kinds of infinite loops in the maintenance branch of FOP. I'd
like to see it go into the final release of the maintenance branch, but I don't know
if I'll have time to give
45 matches
Mail list logo
