J.Pietschmann wrote:
Victor Mote wrote:
Yes, without some sort of regression testing mechanism,
We should have that now, see
test/java/org/apache/fop/GenericFOPTestCase.java
I deliberatly went for a self containg test scheme, which
means not even external XML files. Add tests at will
--- Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to control the document name when
printing from the
command line (fop-0.20.5, java 1.4.1_01-b01 running
under Windows XP
Pro).
I'm unsure what you mean--are you referring to the
-print render type? I don't think so here...
Glen
gmazza 2003/10/07 13:06:17
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/apps XSLTInputHandler.java
Log:
Removed nonfunctional setParameter() function from XSLTInputHandler. (Bug 23624,
submitted by Julien Cervelle).
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +0 -9
J.Pietschmann wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
public class CharUtilities {
...
+public static int getWordWidth(String word, Font fs) {
That's ugly. Shouldn't this be a method of Font?
Although I don't recognize it as ugly, I have no objection to your proposal.
I was making it
gmazza 2003/10/07 13:38:33
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/apps Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain Driver.java
Log:
Porting from trunk back to maintenance a check for a null class loader while loading
ElementMappings; code originally done by Keiron
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23480.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Galluzzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clay Leeds wrote:
Is there any way to control the document name when printing from the
command line (fop-0.20.5, java 1.4.1_01-b01 running under Windows XP
Pro).
snip/
Any ideas that don't involve getting
gmazza 2003/10/07 14:19:30
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/apps Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain
PrintStarter.java
Log:
Printer Job name specified as FOP Document instead of default Java Printing
(thanks to Eric Galuzzo for help on this.)
Revision Changes
gmazza 2003/10/07 14:22:04
Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/render/awt AWTPrintRenderer.java
Log:
Document name switched from default Java Printing text to FOP Document.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +2 -2
--- Eric Galluzzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The name of a printer job can be set via the
java.awt.print.PrinterJob.setJobName( String )
method. This would need
to be done within whatever class creates the printer
job and prints it.
snip/
Hmmm, this is probably a really unhelpful
-Original Message-
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip/
[...] I have been browsing around in the
source, and pinpointed *the* class which needs to be modified (maintenance
branch, but seems to be the same for HEAD, if I'm correct):
-Original Message-
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
( I see Glen, in the meantime has beaten me to it :) )
Just tried the following:
- added a member variable to PrintStarter:
line 90 - private String pjname;
^^^
Sorry, too fast ;)
Glen Mazza wrote:
Not at all-just updated maintenance and trunk to state
FOP Document instead of Java Printing. Thanks for
the quick pointer on how to do so.
File names are not presently available within the
AWTPrintRenderer in order to display them--OTOH, I
don't think we want to get into
-Original Message-
From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be great if there were a flag/arg that could be added to the
COMMAND LINE to enable some type of identification to be appended (like
the date/time stamp like '200310061500' might be good--or since it's a
--- Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be great if there were a flag/arg that
could be added to the
COMMAND LINE to enable some type of identification
to be appended (like
the date/time stamp like '200310061500' might be
good--or since it's a
flag/arg, append the filename if
Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be great if there were a flag/arg that
could be added to the
COMMAND LINE to enable some type of identification
to be appended (like
the date/time stamp like '200310061500' might be
good--or since it's a
flag/arg, append the
-Original Message-
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Glen judges that it would hardly be worth the effort, I can understand
perfectly that there are more important issues... So if need be, I'll just
enter a patch one of the coming days.
On second thought, I
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks again for all of your collective (not to mention quick!) help on
this.
Maestro,
If mine is included, you're welcome of course. (No replies? Admittedly,
perhaps I do leave little to add ;) )
Don't worry... I don't think
18 matches
Mail list logo
