DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13450.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12630.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13451.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Why not a fast, flexible and reliable solution? 3 things are needed:
o Java routines to calculate barcode rectangles and label areas depending
from barcode type and its parameters. Possibly such routines are freely
available. Otherwise: give me the specs, I will write the code (the nowadays
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13450.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
here is an interesting link:
http://www-sp.iti.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/software/ppower4/
It seems that the pdf format allows also to create some
interesting effects usefull when doing presentations. Take a look at the
examples in that link. It would be interesting to add the capacity of
When last updated, on the 10th of June 2002, it was stated that the
development effort is roughly 35% towards a developers release.
May I ask, four months later, if the baby is growing well ?
P. Andries
-
To unsubscribe,
Me:
So what I was hoping for is a suggestion for something that I can work
on that might be useful, but not critical to any immediate plans,
ideally something that overlaps little with currently active portions of
the project.
There were no replies yesterday.
Does anyone have a
Hi Scott,
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 16:20, Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote:
Does anyone have a suggestion about something I could look at fixing /
enhancing which is not mission-critical, but which might give me a chance
to look at a fair bit of the code?
The integration of jfor
Hello FOP contributors,
I am conducting a survey about the way bugs are handled in open source
software projects. The survey includes questions that can be answered by
developers,testers, bug fixers, project managers, and owners of defect
databases. It is only and only for research purposes and
Hi,
I wanted to let you know that I successfully registered a
FO-editor-project at Sourceforge yesterday. I'm _not_ trying to compete
with Paul's ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I just thought there might have
been some problems with his registration. My request was approved within
4 hours. I have
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4002.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm talking mainly about font metrics at the moment. There are several
areas to the whole discussion though:
- font metrics (has an effect on the layout/appearance)
- available fonts (different font types and sources, different quality
of information)
- font
I am jumping straight in...let me know how to gt into the project and start
contributing
-Original Message-
From: Marc D. Migge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FO WYSIWYG-Editor
I'm willing to help (slowly) implementing the bidi support
(contextualisation and bidi algorithms). Is someone else busy doing it ? Is
the time ripe to do so ?
- Message d'origine -
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(See attached file: example.fo)
(See attached file: fo.gif)
hi pat,
Mark Malone wrote:
where do I sign-up!?
People, don't take it wrong, but you know, it's *fop*-dev list actually :)
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn International, Israel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Message d'origine -
De : Oleg Tkachenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 12:53
Objet : Re: FO WYSIWYG-Editor Project launched @ Sourceforge
Mark Malone wrote:
where do I sign-up!?
People, don't take it wrong, but you know, it's *fop*-dev list actually
patrick andries wrote:
where do I sign-up!?
People, don't take it wrong, but you know, it's *fop*-dev list actually :)
Well, where should they go ?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/prettypress I presume. It's now different
project with own maillists etc.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13464.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
patrick andries wrote:
I'm willing to help (slowly) implementing the bidi support
(contextualisation and bidi algorithms). Is someone else busy doing it ? Is
the time ripe to do so ?
Implementation of bidi algorithm itself is not a problem as java has already
bidi support since jdk1.3 (it's
Hi Scott
Your offer is highly appreciated even if the feedback to your initial
mail was a bit sparse. :-) We're all struggling for time to work on FOP
and gladly take any helping hand.
On 09.10.2002 17:15:21 Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote:
= Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
= Scott
I think struggling might be understating it, at least for me. Kull Wahad! Why does
the work come in faster than time? I think I smell the secret to hyperspace here...
-Original Message-
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:07 PM
To:
Good, no need to help thus.
- Message d'origine -
De : Oleg Tkachenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 13:51
Objet : Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP
patrick andries wrote:
I'm willing to help (slowly) implementing the bidi support
(contextualisation
patrick andries wrote:
Good, no need to help thus.
I didn't say that! Volunteers are desperately needed, they are blood of fop
project, so if you are willing - you are welcome. Look at today's New
Developer Suggestion thread, for example.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn
- Message d'origine -
De : Oleg Tkachenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
patrick andries wrote:
Good, no need to help thus.
I didn't say that! Volunteers are desperately needed, they are blood of
fop
project, so if you are willing - you are welcome. Look at today's New
Developer Suggestion
patrick andries wrote:
When last updated, on the 10th of June 2002, it was stated that the
development effort is roughly 35% towards a developers release.
May I ask, four months later, if the baby is growing well ?
Well, some important parts have been done but it is still
perhaps 39% or
patrick andries wrote:
(*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatures (see the
substitution feature in Opentype) should be selected from fo ? I believe
there is currently no such mechanism. Should we wait until another version of
XSL-FO? Extensions ?
IIRC the spec mentions it's
pietsch 2002/10/09 12:30:21
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/render/ps Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain
PSRenderer.java
Log:
Fixed sloppy passing of StringBuffer which causes problems if
debug information is generated.
PR:13433
Submitted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6243.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8698.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6243.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Patrick Andries wrote:
(*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatures (see the
substitution feature in Opentype) should be selected from fo ? I believe
there is currently no such mechanism. Should we wait until another version
of XSL-FO? Extensions ?
If I understand the OpenType
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13464.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sauyet, Scott wrote:
Does anyone have a suggestion about something I could look at fixing /
enhancing which is not mission-critical, but which might give me a chance
to look at a fair bit of the code?
There are some documents in the trunk docs/design directory that have a list
of things that
- Message d'origine -
De : J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 15:30
Objet : Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP
patrick andries wrote:
(*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatures (see the
substitution feature in Opentype) should
- Message d'origine -
De : Victor Mote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 15:39
Objet : RE: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP
Patrick Andries wrote:
(*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatures (see the
substitution feature in Opentype) should be
Hi Scott,
On Wednesday 09 October 2002 17:15, Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote:
. . .
So is integrating other renderers something that the group
would eventually like to do?
. . .
Yes, we've been talking about structure-based renderers (like RTF and MIF)
vs. layout-based ones (PDF being the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13464.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13464.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
patrick andries wrote:
There are also various code points assigned
to ligatures and presentation forms, for example U+FB01, which
could be used in the FO source (at the risk of confusing
hyphenation, spell checkers and others).
Not a good idea, these code points are deprecated. Ligatures are
- Message d'origine -
De : J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 17:27
Objet : Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP
patrick andries wrote:
There are also various code points assigned
to ligatures and presentation forms, for example U+FB01, which
Victor Mote schrieb:
FOP Developers:
I submitted a patch (through Bugzilla, for trunk) that fixes some problems
in the pdfdoc build. I realize that Joerg is doing some work in that area as
well, and I don't mean to step on any of that, but I am not sure exactly
what that work involves, so
Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote:
So what I was hoping for is a suggestion for something that I can work
on that might be useful, but not critical to any immediate plans,
ideally something that overlaps little with currently active portions of
the project.
There were no replies yesterday.
Christian Geisert wrote:
Ok. IMHO the next step should be the migration of the current docs
to forrest (Joerg?)
Migration to forrest DTDs. I seem to have lost track of recent changes,
and I'm still unwilling to force everyone to use forrest, which includes
Cocoon, simply to build the docs,
J.Pietschmann wrote:
...
For working on HEAD, pick an area:
- layout core
- a renderer
- the font subsystem
- API and configuration
- parsing and property resolution
Don't pick this one. There is definitely a lot of work going on in this
area, which will at least be relevant to HEAD.
Oleg,
Thanks for this. I just had a look at java.text.Bidi, and was led
inexorably into java.awt.font, and from there back to bedrock -
java.lang.Character. It's Wonderland in there, and I haven't had time
to digest it, but it looks as though all of the attributes from the
Unicode
Patrick,
It remains to be seen how the 1.4 BIDI handling can be integrated with
FOP's layout, and how BIDI processing can be gracefully declined for
users not running 1.4. As Unicode and i18n are your strengths, I think
your input on this would be very valuable. Perhaps Oleg is already
pbwest 2002/10/09 20:16:12
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
FOAttributes.java
Log:
Remove xmlns attributes before processing.
Delete Attributes object from event after processing.
Revision ChangesPath
No
pbwest 2002/10/09 20:27:01
Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/expr Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design
PropertyParser.java
Log:
Allow IntegerType PropertyValues as arguments to parseAdditiveExpr() and
parseUnaryExpr().
Restructure parseMultiplicativeExpr() to include
50 matches
Mail list logo
